Impact of Livelihood Assets on Farmland-Transferred Households’ Willingness to Urbanism and Policies Implications for Farmland Transfer: Evidence from Zhejiang, China

Table 4

Reliability of the manifest variables.

Latent variables	Manifest variables	Loadings	Cronbach’s α	AVE	CR
Farmland transfer
BFT	TI	0.88	0.630	0.538	0.690
	TA	0.55
OFT	TF	0.76	0.759	0.617	0.763
	FT	0.81
Willingness to urbanism
UI	UT	0.83	0.682	0.569	0.723
	MR	0.67
Livelihood assets
HC	HC1	0.99	0.724	0.561	0.768
	HC2	0.33
	HC3	0.77
PC	PC1	0.40	0.702	0.511	0.739
	PC2	0.94
	PC3	0.70
FC	FC1	0.90	0.638	0.545	0.700
	FC2	0.53
SC	SC1	0.65	0.792	0.579	0.803
	SC2	0.79
	SC3	0.83

Cronbach’s α is Cronbach’s alpha. AVE is average variance extracted. CR is construct reliability.
Abbreviations: BFT, Benefit of farmland transfer; OFT, Openness in farmland transfer; TI, Transfer income; TA, Transfer area; TF, Transferee; FT, Farmland transfer tenure; UI, Willingness to urbanism; UT, Urbanization type; MR, Migration region; NC, Natural capital; NC1, Farmland area; NC2, High quality farmland; HC, Human capital; HC1, Education level; HC2, Labour force; HC3, Health status; PC, Physical capital; PC1, Residential quantity; PC2, Residential quality; PC3, Public transportation; FC, Financial capital; FC1, Nonagricultural income; FC2, Capacity to borrow; SC, Social capital; SC1, Relationship with friends; SC2, Relationship with relatives; SC3, Relationship with village cadres.