Environmental Risk Assessment of Subway Station Construction to Achieve Sustainability Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Set Pair Analysis

Table 7

The importance levels of the corrected evaluation indicators and weighting results.

Indicator	E1	E2	E3	E4	E5	E6	E7
E1	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.400, 0.450)	(0.212, 0.645)	(0.188, 0.688)	(0.291, 0.526)	(0.403, 0.390)	(0.678, 0.190)
E2	(0.517, 0.329)	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.300, 0.600)	(0.255, 0.573)	(0.395, 0.383)	(0.544, 0.251)	(0.743, 0.151)
E3	(0.673, 0.187)	(0.646, 0.253)	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.400, 0.450)	(0.544, 0.230)	(0.673, 0.158)	(0.876, 0.079)
E4	(0.713, 0.166)	(0.619, 0.211)	(0.517, 0.329)	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.600, 0.250)	(0.696, 0.137)	(0.875, 0.073)
E5	(0.576, 0.243)	(0.446, 0.324)	(0.285, 0.478)	(0.311, 0.535)	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.600, 0.250)	(0.788, 0.104)
E6	(0.452, 0.335)	(0.311, 0.478)	(0.192, 0.628)	(0.168, 0.652)	(0.311, 0.535)	(0.500, 0.300)	(0.700, 0.200)
E7	(0.228, 0.634)	(0.184, 0.702)	(0.075, 0.874)	(0.075, 0.874)	(0.122, 0.767)	(0.241, 0.658)	(0.500, 0.300)
	(0.0893, 0.829)	(0.109, 0.802)	(0.145, 0.761)	(0.151, 0.752)	(0.117, 0.787)	(0.088, 0.827)	(0.048, 0.902)
	0.158	0.182	0.219	0.226	0.195	0.160	0.093
	0.128	0.148	0.178	0.183	0.158	0.130	0.075
Ranking	6	4	2	1	3	5	7