Research Article

Evaluation of Health Resource Allocation Efficiency Based on Data Envelopment Analysis 2014–2018 in Two Dimensions of Time-Region

Table 3

DEA effectiveness of health resource allocation efficiency in 31 provinces and cities across the country in 2018.

RegionsComprehensive efficiencyPure technical efficiencyScale efficiencyReturn to scaleRelative effectiveness

Beijing1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Tianjin0.9650.9700.995irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Hebei1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Shanxi1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Inner Mongolia0.9891.0000.990irsWeak-DEA effectiveness
Liaoning0.9751.0000.975irsWeak-DEA effectiveness
Jilin0.8720.9000.970irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Heilongjiang1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Shanghai0.8901.0000.890drsWeak-DEA effectiveness
Jiangsu0.8470.8780.964irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Zhejiang1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Anhui1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Fujian1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Jiangxi1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Shandong0.8420.8430.999drsNon-DEA effectiveness
Henan0.8751.0000.875drsWeak-DEA effectiveness
Hubei0.9420.9650.976irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Hunan0.9730.9760.996drsNon-DEA effectiveness
Guangdong1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Guangxi0.7670.7900.971irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Hainan1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Chongqing0.8960.9010.995irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Sichuan0.9070.9390.966irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Guizhou1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness
Yunnan0.8671.0000.867drsWeak-DEA effectiveness
Tibet0.9010.9900.910irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Shaanxi0.7650.8580.892irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Gansu0.7180.8150.881irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Qinghai0.8350.8890.939irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Ningxia0.8690.9510.914irsNon-DEA effectiveness
Xinjiang1.0001.0001.000Effectiveness