Research Article

Taming the Factor Zoo: New Evidence from China

Table 5

Comparison of models in explaining anomalies. This table reports some statistics derived from using various factor models to explain 104 anomalies. We display results of the Fama–French 6-factor model [10], the Hou–Xue–Zhang q5-factor model [2], the Stambaugh–Yuan 4-factor model [21], the Daniel–Hirshleifer–Sun 3-factor model [22], and the Liu–Stambaugh–Yuan 4-factor model [15], in columns “FF6,” “Q5,” “SY4,” “DHS3,” and “LSY4,” respectively. Average alpha and Average t are the absolute mean of alphas and corresponding t-statistics over 104 anomalies. ∆ is the cross-sectional pricing error with respect to each model, which is computed as formula (1). GRS is the statistic of well-known GRS test proposed by Shanken et al. [24].

FF6Q5SY4DHS3LSY4

Average alpha (%)0.550.460.620.520.31
Average t2.211.642.291.551
Δ3.913.614.293.933.65
GRS4.263.595.114.333.28