Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Disease Markers
Volume 2014, Article ID 541709, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541709
Research Article

Assessment of Lipocalin 2, Clusterin, Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-1, Interleukin-6, Homocysteine, and Uric Acid Levels in Patients with Psoriasis

1Department of Dermatology, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Meram, 42023 Konya, Turkey
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyon, Turkey
3Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Sutcu Imam University, 46050 Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Received 31 January 2014; Accepted 12 March 2014; Published 2 April 2014

Academic Editor: Silvia Persichilli

Copyright © 2014 Arzu Ataseven et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Chronic inflammation may play a role in psoriasis pathogenesis. Lipocalin 2, clusterin, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR-1), interleukin-6, homocysteine, and uric acid are inflammatory and/or biochemical markers. However, both the roles of these markers and the pathogenesis of psoriasis are unknown. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate serum levels of lipocalin 2, clusterin, sTNFR-1, interleukin-6, homocysteine, and uric acid in patients and controls groups. Methods. Fifty-six patients with psoriasis and 33 healthy controls were included in the study. Serum concentrations of the markers were evaluated by ELISA. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was evaluated in all psoriasis patients. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by height (m) squared. Results. The serum value of lipocalin and sTNFR-1 were significantly higher in psoriasis patients than in controls (resp., , ). The others showed no significant differences between psoriasis and the control groups (all of them ). The mean PASI score in the patient group was . Conclusions. These findings suggest that lipocalin 2 and sTNFR-1 might play a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and can be used as markers of the disease.

1. Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic recurrent autoimmune skin disease which shows multifactorial etiology and polygenic genetic transmission. It is considered that numerous proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-alpha, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12, have the main role on the pathogenesis and they are secreted by T cells infiltrated to the skin, in response to unspecified antigenic stimulus. On the other hand, keratinocyte proliferation is a secondary biological phenomenon [1].

Lipocalin 2 (LCN2), also known as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, is a 25 kDa protein. LCN2 has been defined as an adipokine. It is expressed in liver, lungs, and kidneys, as well as adipocytes, macrophages, and epithelial cells [2]. LCN2 is an antimicrobial protein [3]. It is stored in specific granules of the human neutrophil and functions as a modulator of inflammation [4]. LCN2 has been demonstrated to be a proinflammatory molecule causing some to call it a cytokine. LCN2 expression is upregulated in various acute and chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis, eczema, periodontitis, and myocarditis [5].

Clusterin (CLU), also known as apolipoprotein J, is encoded on chromosome 8 in humans. It is excreted from various tissues, such as the brain, neural tissue, liver, adrenal glands, and testes. It can be found in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, mother’s milk, semen, and urine [6, 7]. CLU has important functions in a number of physiological processes. Moreover, CLU may play a role in numerous processes, including autoimmunity, inflammation, and immunological activities [8].

Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR-1): tumor necrosis factor (TNF) plays an important role in various events, such as the induction of other cytokines, cell proliferation, and differentiation [9]. There are two receptors for TNF: tumor necrosis factor receptor- (TNFR-) 1 and TNFR-2. TNFR-1 is expressed ubiquitously and is the major receptor. It mediates the effects of soluble TNF-α on cells [10]. TNF plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, but its mechanism of action is not fully understood [11].

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is one of the most important inflammatory cytokines. It is a component of normal human skin and it has been immunologically detected in basal keratinocytes, endothelial cells, mononuclear cells, and fibroblasts [12]. IL-6 plays a central role in a variety of host defense mechanisms, such as the immune response, hematopoiesis, and acute-phase reactions [13]. The human IL-6 gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 7 [14]. IL-6-knockout mice exhibit impaired immune and acute-phase responses [15].

Homocysteineis an α-amino acid [16]. It is not obtained from the diet; it is biosynthesized from methionine [17]. A high level of homocysteine increases susceptibility to endothelial injury, which leads to vascular inflammation. This in turn may lead to atherogenesis, which can result in ischemic injury [18]. Hyperhomocysteinemia represents an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [19]. Psoriasis is a systemic, chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

Uric acid (UA) is a product of the metabolic breakdown of purine nucleotides [20].

The aim of this study is to investigate the possible roles of LCN2, an inflammatory adipocytokine; CLU, an enigmatic protein associated with inflammation; sTNFR-1 and IL-6, which are among the proinflammatory cytokines; homocysteine and UA in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, that is, an inflammatory skin disorder.

2. Materials and Methods

Fifty-six patients and 33 age- and sex-matched healty controls were prospectively enrolled in this study. Participants gave their informed consent before enrollment. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. Medical history and clinical examinations were performed in both psoriasis and control groups. Clinically and/or histopathologically diagnosed psoriasis was evaluated. PASI scores of the patients with psoriasis were recorded. BMI was calculated as weight/height2 (kg/m2).

2.1. Exclusion Criteria of Patients and Control Groups

Patients who received systemic medication and/or phototherapy were excluded from the study. Other exclusion factors were as follows: BMI ≥ 35, psoriatic arthritis, pregnancy, age < 18 years, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, liver and cardiac failure, acute and chronic infections, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.

2.2. Laboratory Investigations

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from the study and control groups using blood collector tubes. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation (3500 rpm, 4 min) and were stored in a deep freezer (−80°C) until use. LCN2, CLU, sTNFR-1, IL-6, homocysteine, and UA levels were measured in serum samples from patients and controls. ELISA kits for LCN2 (LCN2 NGAL/Human ELISA Kit, BioVendor R&D Laboratorni Medicina a.s., Karasek, Czech Republic), CLU (CLU (apolipoprotein J) Human ELISA Kit, BioVendor R&D), sTNFR-1 (Human sTNFR (60 kDa) Platinum ELISA Kit, eBioscience, Bender MedSystems GmbH, Vienna, Austria), IL-6 (Human IL-6 (interferon-beta 2, B-cell stimulatory factor 2, and HGF) Platinum ELISA Kit, eBioscience), and a microplate reader (BioTek ELx 800, BioTek Instrumentations, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) were used.

Absorbances for all four tests were read at a wavelength of 450 nm. Assay units were ng/mL for LCN2, CLU, and sTNFR, and pg/mL for IL-6. The limit of detection for LCN-2 was 0.02 ng/mL, the standard curve range was 0.3–10 ng/mL, and the calculated overall intra-assay (within-run) coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.7%. The limit of detection for CLU was 0.5 ng/mL, the detection range was 5–160 ng/mL, and the intra-assay CV was 6.2%. The sensitivity for sTNFR-1 was 0.05 ng/mL, the detection range was 0.08–5 ng/mL, and the intra-assay CV was 1.9%. The sensitivity for IL-6 was 0.92 pg/mL, the detection range was 1.56–100 pg/mL, and the intra-assay CV was 3.4%. Six standards and one blank were used for each of the four tests. Homocysteine assays (Homocysteine, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Marburg, Germany) were performed by a chemiluminescence method using an automated immunoassay device (Immulite 2000 XPi Immunoassay System, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA), and uric acid assays were performed by a photometric method (Dimension EXL, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Tarrytown, NY, USA) using an automated immunochemistry analyzer manufactured by the same company.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS Portable PASW Statistics 18. Student’s -test and the chi-squared test were used for group comparisions. Correlations between LCN2, CLU, TNFR-1, IL-6, homocysteine, and UA levels were evaluated by Pearson’s correlation test. values < 0.05 were considered to indicate significance.

3. Results

The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients and control subjects are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning age, sex, or BMI ().

tab1
Table 1: Demographic and laboratory findings of psoriasis and healthy control groups.

The mean LCN2 level was  ng/mL in the patient group and  ng/mL in the control group. The mean CLU level was  ng/mL in the patients and  ng/mL in the controls. The mean sTNFR-1 level was  ng/mL in the patient group and  ng/mL in the control group. Comparisons of the serum LCN2 and sTNFR-1 levels of the patient and the control groups revealed statistically significant difference (, , resp.) (Figures 1 and 2). The mean IL-6 level was  pg/mL in patients and  pg/mL in the control group. The mean homocysteine level was μmol/mL in patients and μmol/mL in the control group. The mean UA level was  mg/dL in patients and  mg/dL in the control group. There were no significant differences in CLU, IL-6, homocysteine, or UA levels between psoriasis patients and the control group (). The mean PASI score in the patient group was . Mean BMI was in patients and in the control group (). PASI showed significant positive correlations with homocysteine (: 0.334; : 0.013) and UA (: 0.268; : 0.046) levels (Figures 3 and 4). BMI showed significant positive correlations with UA (: 0.258; : 0.016) and IL-6 (: 0.331; : 0.002) levels (Figures 5 and 6). Other parameters were not correlated with PASI and BMI.

541709.fig.001
Figure 1: Lipocalin 2 levels in psoriasis and control groups.
541709.fig.002
Figure 2: sTNFR-1 levels in psoriasis and control groups.
541709.fig.003
Figure 3: Positive correlation of uric acid levels and PASI.
541709.fig.004
Figure 4: Positive correlation of homocysteine levels and PASI.
541709.fig.005
Figure 5: Positive correlation of IL-6 levels and BMI.
541709.fig.006
Figure 6: Positive correlation of uric acid levels and BMI.

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that serum LCN2 levels were significantly increased in patients with psoriasis compared with healty controls. There are a limited number of previous studies of LCN2 in psoriasis. Kamata et al. [2] found that serum LCN2 levels were significantly higher compared to those in healthy controls. Romani et al. [21] also found significantly higher levels of serum LCN2 compared to healthy controls. These two studies were similar to ours and demonstrated high levels of LCN2. However, a study by El-Hadidi et al. [22] did not show significant differences in LCN2 levels compared to controls. Despite this, the authors noted that tissue LCN2 levels were significantly higher [23]. Another study showed that LCN2 gene expression is induced by IL-17 [24]. Lee et al. investigated psoriasis-like diseases and found that in vitro LCN2 expression was highly increased in calcium-induced keratinocyte differentiation [25]. Other researchers also detected increased levels of tissue LCN2 expression using in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and immunohistochemical methods [26, 27]. Similar to our findings, the previous studies demonstrated that serum and/or tissue levels of LCN2 were generally increased. There are conflicting results regarding the correlation between LCN2 and PASI [24, 21]. These differences can be attributed to several factors. One of the main causes is the fact that LCN2 is secreted from various tissues, such as liver, lungs, and kidneys, as well as adipocytes, macrophages, and epithelial cells. Other factors, such as the diversity of patient groups consisting of individuals with different disease durations and severities, past medical history, and medical therapies, may also explain the conflicting results. LCN2 may not completely reflect the degree of skin inflammation of all patients with psoriasis.

Despite LCN2 being an adipokine, we found no significant correlation between LCN2 levels and BMI in either patients with psoriasis or in controls. Kamata et al. [2] also found no relationship between LCN2 and BMI in psoriasis patients and controls. Stejskal et al. [28] also reported no correlation between LCN2 and BMI in patients with metabolic syndrome. However, other studies reported different results [22]. Also in psoriasis, LCN2 has been investigated in metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, obesity, and diabetes mellitus [22, 29, 30]. There was no significant difference in the serum CLU levels in psoriasis patients compared to healthy controls in our study. To our knowledge, this is the second study to assess CLU levels in psoriasis patients. The first was conducted in 21 psoriasis patients and 11 healthy controls by Garcia-Rodriguez et al. [31], who found lower plasma CLU levels in psoriasis patients. Recent studies found that CLU has anti-iflammatory properties. The severity of autoimmune myocarditis was increased in CLU-deficient mice, and inflammation progressed rapidly [32]. Similarly, CLU was highly expressed in the synovia of patients with rheumatoid arthritis [33].

The findings concerning CLU levels are contradictory. Its level is increased in some cancers, including prostate, ovary, and bladder cancers, and this increase was associated with a poor prognosis [34]. Fandridis et al. [35] determined that sCLU is involved in both inflammatory and apoptotic molecular processes and noted a high sCLU concentration in human serum and synovial fluid. Wang et al. [36] concluded that decreased CLU levels affect the pathogenesis of SLE due to the diminished protective effects.

Tobisawa et al. [37] retrospectively performed immunostaining in the patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. They claimed that CLU expression could be used as a prognostic marker in early-stage mycosis fungoides to determine the progression to a poor prognosis. Serum CLU levels were found to be higher in patients with systemic sclerosis by Yanaba et al. [38], who noted that the patients with higher CLU levels experienced digital ulcer and pulmonary arterial hypertension less frequently. CLU has a protective role in pulmonary arterial hypertension and digital ulcer. Although the various biological functions of CLU have long been investigated, it remains an enigmatic protein [39]. Hence, additional studies are required to understand the role of CLU as a novel molecule in psoriasis.

In the present study, the soluble TNFR-1 level was higher in psoriasis patients than in controls. There are conflicting results in the literature. Serwin et al. [40] found that serum TNFR-1 levels were significantly increased in patients with psoriasis compared with those in controls. Brotas et al. [41] reported that TNF-α has various effects on the cellular level in psoriasis. Coimbra et al. [42] found no differences in TNF levels between patients and controls. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that TNFR-1 level plays a role in the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis.

The serum IL-6 levels did not differ between the psoriasis patients and controls in this study. Increased serum levels of IL-6 have been reported in psoriasis patients [4345]. As in our study, Kaur et al. [46] reported a statistically significant elevation of IL-6 concentration in obese psoriasis patients. However, in psoriasis patients with normal body weights, the increase was not significant. One possible explanation for the absence of high IL-6 levels in our patients is their lower BMI than those in the study of Kaur et al.

In our study, there were no significant differences in serum homocysteine levels between psoriasis patients and healthy controls. Serum homocysteine levels in patients with psoriasis were positively correlated with PASI. Several researchers have demonstrated significantly increased homocsyteine levels in the psoriasis patients compared with controls [19, 4752]. However, Cakmak et al. [53] in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey, the same region as in our study, reported no significant difference in homocysteine levels between psoriasis patients and controls, although serum homocysteine levels correlated with PASI, in agreement with our findings. The difference in findings may be related to regional and/or genetic differences between psoriasis patients. Few studies have shown a relationship between homocysteine levels and PASI [48, 52, 53]. The increased cardiovascular risk with increasing psoriasis severity might be due to homocysteine.

In the present study, serum UA levels did not differ significantly between psoriasis patients and controls. However, serum UA levels were correlated with PASI and BMI. According to previous reports, serum UA levels can be higher in up to 30–50% of psoriasis patients. This can be attributed to the increased epidermal proliferation and associated DNA destruction in psoriasis [54]. Some studies have reported increased UA levels in psoriasis [5557]. A positive correlation between UA levels and PASI and BMI has been reported [58].

After 12 weeks of therapy, a significant reduction of mean UA level was observed in psoriasis patients. Moreover, increased UA levels were accompanied by increased serum C-reactive protein levels [59]. In agreement with our findings, Kwon et al. [58] did not find high UA levels in patients with psoriasis. High UA levels might be associated with disease severity; another explanation is nutrition-related factors [60], such as obesity and metabolic syndrome. The absence of increased UA levels in our study might be due to the lower disease severity (the mean PASI score was not high) and BMI values of our patients.

In conclusion, LCN2 and sTNFR-1 likely play meaningful roles in the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis. CLU, IL-6, homocysteine, and UA levels did not differ between the patient and healthy control groups. However, in psoriasis patients, the homocysteine and UA levels were correlated with the PASI score, an index of disease severity. The increased cardiovascular risk with increasing psoriasis severity might be caused by homocysteine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. A. M. Ceyhan, M. Yildirim, B. M. Ceyhan, and R. Sütçü, “Serum neopterin and TNF-α levels in psoriasis and their correlation with disease severity,” Turkderm Deri Hastaliklari ve Frengi Arsivi, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Kamata, Y. Tada, A. Tatsuta et al., “Serum lipocalin-2 levels are increased in patients with psoriasis,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 296–299, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. H. Flo, K. D. Smith, S. Sato et al., “Lipocalin 2 mediates an innate immune response to bacterial infection by sequestrating iron,” Nature, vol. 432, no. 7019, pp. 917–921, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. B. Cowland and N. Borregaard, “Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans,” Genomics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Chakraborty, S. Kaur, S. Guha, and S. K. Batra, “The multifaceted roles of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) in inflammation and cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1826, no. 1, pp. 129–169, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Calero, A. Rostagno, B. Frangione, and J. Ghiso, “Clusterin and Alzheimer's disease,” Sub-Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 38, pp. 273–298, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Nuutinen, T. Suuronen, A. Kauppinen, and A. Salminen, “Valproic acid stimulates clusterin expression in human astrocytes: Implications for Alzheimer's disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 475, no. 2, pp. 64–68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Falgarone and G. Chiocchia, “Chapter 8: clusterin: a multifacet protein at the crossroad of inflammation and autoimmunity,” Advances in Cancer Research, vol. 104, pp. 139–170, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Rothe, G. Gehr, H. Loetscher, and W. Lesslauer, “Tumor necrosis factor receptors-structure and function,” Immunologic Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81–90, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. D. Kinloch, C. M. Lee, N. van Rooijen, and E. T. Morgan, “Selective role for tumor necrosis factor-α, but not interleukin-1 or Kupffer cells, in down-regulation of CYP3A11 and CYP3A25 in livers of mice infected with a noninvasive intestinal pathogen,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 312–321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Kumari, M. C. Bonnet, M. H. Ulvmar et al., “Tumor necrosis factor receptor signaling in keratinocytes triggers interleukin-24-dependent psoriasis like skin inflammation in mice,” Immunity, vol. 39, pp. 899–911, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Castells-Rodellas, J. V. Castell, A. Ramirez-Bosca, J. F. Nicolas, F. Valcuende-Cavero, and J. Thivolet, “Interleukin-6 in normal skin and psoriasis,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 165–168, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. van Snick, “Interleukin-6: An overview,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 8, pp. 253–278, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. B. Sehgal, “Interleukin-6: molecular pathophysiology,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 94, pp. 2S–6S, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Fattori, M. Cappelletti, P. Costa et al., “Defective inflammatory response in interleukin 6-deficient mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 4, pp. 1243–1250, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. J. Martí-Carvajal, I. Solà, D. Lathyris, and G. Salanti, “Homocysteine lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Selhub, “Homocysteine metabolism,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 19, pp. 217–246, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Brian Boudi, “Noncoronary atherosclerosis overview of atherosclerosis,” Medscape, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. V. Brazzelli, V. Grasso, L. Fornara et al., “Homocysteine, vitamin B12 and folic acid levels in psoriatic patients and correlation with disease severity,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 911–916, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. H. McCrudden, Uric Acid, BiblioBazaar, 2008.
  21. J. Romani, A. Caixas, V. Ceperuelo-Mallafre et al., “Circulating levels of lipocalin-2 and retinol-binding protein-4 are increased in psoriatic patients and correlated with baseline PASI,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 305, pp. 105–112, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. El-Hadidi, N. Samir, O. G. Shaker, and S. Otb, “Estimation of tissue and serum lipocalin-2 in psoriasis vulgaris and its relation to metabolic syndrome,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. 239–45, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Guttman-Yassky, M. A. Lowes, J. Fuentes-Duculan et al., “Low expression of the IL-23/Th17 pathway in atopic dermatitis compared to psoriasis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 10, pp. 7420–7427, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Shen, Z. Hu, J. Goswami, and S. L. Gaffen, “Identification of common transcriptional regulatory elements in interleukin-17 target genes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 34, pp. 24138–24148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. H. Lee, K. C. Kye, E. Y. Seo et al., “Expression of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in calcium-induced keratinocyte differentiation,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 302–306, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. J. Seo, J. Y. Ahn, C. K. Hong et al., “Expression of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in skin epidermis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 510–512, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Mallbris, K. P. O'Brien, A. Hulthén et al., “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a marker for dysregulated keratinocyte differentiation in human skin,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 584–591, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Stejskal, M. Karpíšek, V. Humenanska et al., “Lipocalin-2: development, analytical characterization, and clinical testing of a new ELISA,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 381–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Wu, H. Li, M. Zhou et al., “Mechanism and clinical evidence of lipocalin-2 and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein linking obesity and atherosclerosis,” Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. Y. Xiao, A. Xu, X. Hui et al., “Circulating lipocalin-2 and retinol-binding protein 4 are associated with intima-media thickness and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, Article ID e66607, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Garcia-Rodriguez, S. Arias-Santiago, R. Perandres-Lopez et al., “Decreased plasma levels of clusterin in patients with psoriasis,” Actas Dermosifiliogr, vol. 104, pp. 497–503, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  32. L. McLaughlin, G. Zhu, M. Mistry et al., “Apolipoprotein J/clusterin limits the severity of murine autoimmune myocarditis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 1105–1113, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. V. Devauchelle, A. Essabbani, G. de Pinieux et al., “Characterization and functional consequences of underexpression of clusterin in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 9, pp. 6471–6479, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Blumenstein, F. Saad, S. Hotte et al., “Reduction in serum clusterin is a potential therapeutic biomarker in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with custirsen,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 2, pp. 468–477, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. E. Fandridis, G. Apergis, D. S. Korres et al., “Increased expression levels of apolipoprotein J/clusterin during primary osteoarthritis,” In Vivo, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 745–749, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Wang, P. Erling, A. A. Bengtsson, L. Truedsson, G. Sturfelt, and D. Erlinge, “Transcriptional down-regulation of the platelet ADP receptor P2Y12 and clusterin in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1436–1442, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Tobisawa, M. Honna, A. Ishida-Yamamoto, Y. Saijo, and H. lizuka, “Prognostic factors in 105 Japanese cases of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: clusterin expression as a novel prognostic factor,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 71, pp. 160–166, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  38. K. Yanaba, Y. Asano, Y. Tada, M. Sugaya, T. Kadono, and S. Sato, “A possible contribution of elevated serum clusterin levels to the inhibition of digital ulcers and pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 304, pp. 459–463, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Bettuzzi, “Chapter 1: introduction,” Advances in cancer research, vol. 104, pp. 1–8, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. B. Serwin, M. Sokolowska, and B. Chodynicka, “Soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor type 1 in psoriasis patients treated with narrowband ultraviolet B,” Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 210–211, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. M. Brotas, J. M. Cunha, E. H. Lago, C. C. Machado, and S. C. Carneiro, “Tumor necrosis factoralpha and the cytokine network in psoriasis.,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, vol. 87, pp. 673–681, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. S. Coimbra, H. Oliveira, F. Reis et al., “Interleukin (IL)-22, IL-17, IL-23, IL-8, vascular endothelial growth factor and tumour necrosis factor-α levels in patients with psoriasis before, during and after psoralen-ultraviolet A and narrowband ultraviolet B therapy,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 1282–1290, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G.-M. Alenius, C. Eriksson, and S. R. Dahlqvist, “Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha—Markers of inflammation in patients with psoriatic arthritis?” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 120–123, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. H. Koliadenko and P. V. Chernyshov, “Interleukin-6 as a marker of the activity of a pathological process in patients with psoriasis,” Likars'ka Sprava, no. 5-6, pp. 80–82, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. O. Arican, M. Aral, S. Sasmaz, and P. Ciragil, “Serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-17, and IL-18 in patients with active psoriasis and correlation with disease severity,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2005, no. 5, pp. 273–279, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Kaur, K. Zilmer, C. Kairane, M. Kals, and M. Zilmer, “Clear differences in adiponectin level and glutathione redox status revealed in obese and normal-weight patients with psoriasis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1364–1367, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. M. Tobin, R. Hughes, E. B. Hand, T. Leong, I. M. Graham, and B. Kirby, “Homocysteine status and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis: a case-control study,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Malerba, P. Gisondi, A. Radaeli, R. Sala, P. G. Calzavara Pinton, and G. Girolomoni, “Plasma homocysteine and folate levels in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 1165–1169, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. B. Vanizor Kural, A. Örem, G. Çimşit, H. A. Uydu, Y. E. Yandi, and A. Alver, “Plasma homocysteine and its relationships with atherothrombotic markers in psoriatic patients,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 332, no. 1-2, pp. 23–30, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. Refsum, S. Helland, and P. M. Ueland, “Fasting plasma homocysteine as a sensitive parameter of antifolate effect: a study of psoriasis patients receiving low-dose methotrexate treatment,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 510–520, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. O. Karabudak, R. Eralp Ulusoy, A. Akyol Erikci, E. Solmazgul, B. Dogan, and Y. Harmanyeri, “Inflammation and hypercoagulable state in adult psoriatic men,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 337–340, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. G. Richetta, C. Mattozzi, L. Macaluso et al., “Homocysteine plasmatic status in patients with psoriasis,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 621–623, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. K. Cakmak, U. Gul, C. Kilic, M. Gonul, S. Soylu, and A. Kilic, “Homocysteine, vitamin B12 and folic acid levels in psoriasis patients,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 23, pp. 300–303, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  54. E. Christophers and U. Mrowietz, “Psoriasis,” in Dermatology in General Medicine, T. B. Fitzpatrick, I. M. Freedberg, A. Z. Eisen et al., Eds., pp. 407–427, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  55. P. Gisondi, G. Targher, A. Cagalli, and G. Girolomoni, “Hyperuricemia in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 70, pp. 127–130, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  56. G. Grzybowski, I. Fafara, R. Zaba, and B. Wierusz-Wysocka, “Evaluation of glucose, insulin, C-peptide uric acid serum levels in patients with psoriasis,” Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski, vol. 11, no. 66, pp. 495–498, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Severin, B. Nave, M. Ständer, R. Ott, and H. Traupe, “Total antioxidative capacity is normal in sera from psoriasis patients despite elevated bilirubin, tocopherol and urate levels,” Dermatology, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 336–339, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. H. Kwon, I. H. Kwon, J. W. Choi, and J. I. Youn, “Cross-sectional study on the correlation of serum uric acid with disease severity in Korean patients with psoriasis,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. I. Isha, V. K. Jain, and H. Lal, “C-reactive protein and uric acid levels in patients with psoriasis,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 309–311, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. T. J. Angelopoulos, J. Lowndes, L. Zukley et al., “The effect of high-fructose corn syrup consumption on triglycerides and uric acid,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, pp. 1242S–1245S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus