Research Article
The Prognostic Value of Pyrosequencing-Detected MGMT Promoter Hypermethylation in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Glioblastoma
Table 4
Cox proportional hazard models predicting overall survival (dependent variable).
| | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | | HR | 95% CIs | value | HR | 95% CIs | value |
| Gender (men versus women) | 0.79 | 0.84–1.83 | 0.59 | | | | Age (each year) | 1.08 | 1.03–1.12 | 0.0008 | | | | Surgery (done versus not done) | 0.31 | 0.11–0.96 | 0.0439 | | | | Radiotherapy (done versus not done) | 0.08 | 0.02–0.24 | <0.0001 | 0.10 | 0.02–0.42 | 0.0021 | Chemotherapy (done versus not done) | 0.26 | 0.07–1.01 | 0.052 | 0.15 | 0.03–0.86 | 0.033 | MGMT methylation (each unit increase) | 0.99 | 0.97–1.03 | 0.96 | | | |
| MGMT methylation (>13% versus ≤13%) | 0.57 | 0.24–1.31 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.12–0.92 | 0.035 |
|
|
95% CIs: 95% confidence intervals; HR: hazard ratio.
|