Research Article

OGG1 Mutations and Risk of Female Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis and Experimental Data

Table 3

Mutations in OGG1 gene in breast cancer patients with conservation score, SIFT score, Align GVGD score, Grantham distance, and Mutation Taster prediction.

Change in nucleotide
with its conservation level PhyloP score [−14.1; 6.4]
Change in codonAmino acid change
with its conservation level (up to 13 species)
SIFT score
(median)
Align GVGD score
(C0–C65)
Grantham dist. (for physicochemical difference b/w amino acids)
(0–215)
Mutation Taster (p value)

g.9793544T>G
Highly conserved nucleotide phyloP: 4.97
GTG to GGGVal159Gly
Moderately conserved amino acid
Deleterious 0.01 (2.95)C0 (GV: 197.52-GD: 72.75)109 (moderate) Disease causing
()

g.9796483G>A
Moderately conserved nucleotide phyloP: 2.38
GGG to AGGGly221Arg
Moderately conserved amino acid
Tolerated 0.28 (2.95)C0 (GV: 161.50-GD: 19.25125 (moderate)Disease causing
()

g.9798773C>G
Not conserved nucleotide phyloP: 0.28
TCC to TGCSer326Cys
Weakly conserved amino acid
Tolerated 0.19 (2.95) C0 (GV: 353.86-GD: 0.00)112 (moderate) Polymorphism
()

g.9807669G>A
Weakly conserved nucleotide phyloP: 0.12
TGG to TGATrp375STOP
Moderately conserved amino acid
Deleterious 0.01 (2.95)C0 (GV: 197.52-GD: 72.75)170 (large)
Protein truncation
Disease causing
()

PhyloP was used as a conservation score rating the nucleotides from “not conserved” (−14.1) to “highly conserved” (6.4). Align GVGD score: most likely deleterious (C65) to least likely deleterious (C0) GV (Grantham variation) and GD (Grantham deviation). The Grantham distance was used to evaluate physicochemical changes in amino acids (0 = no physicochemical changes; 215 = large changes). In silico predictions were performed using PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping-2), SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant) score: <0.05 deleterious, >0.05 tolerated, and Mutation Taster: disease causing variants (p value = 1.0), might not be disease causing (p value <0.99).