Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Disease Markers
Volume 2015, Article ID 857108, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/857108
Research Article

First-Trimester Serum Acylcarnitine Levels to Predict Preeclampsia: A Metabolomics Approach

1Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), 3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
2Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Analytical Biosciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
3Discovery & Exploratory BA, Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics & Metabolism, Discovery Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium
4Centre for Infectious Diseases Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
5Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, 3501 DE Utrecht, Netherlands
6Centre for Health Protection (GZB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands

Received 13 April 2015; Accepted 27 May 2015

Academic Editor: Vincent Sapin

Copyright © 2015 Maria P. H. Koster et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Geographic variation in the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy. World Health Organization international collaborative study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 80–83, 1988.
  2. J. A. Hutcheon, S. Lisonkova, and K. S. Joseph, “Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 391–403, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Visser, B. B. Van Rijn, G. T. Rijkers, A. Franx, and H. W. Bruinse, “Inflammatory changes in preeclampsia: current understanding of the maternal innate and adaptive immune response,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 191–201, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Huppertz, “Placental origins of preeclampsia: challenging the current hypothesis,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 970–975, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. A. P. Steegers, P. von Dadelszen, J. J. Duvekot, and R. Pijnenborg, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9741, pp. 631–644, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Kuc, E. J. Wortelboer, B. B. van Rijn, A. Franx, G. H. A. Visser, and P. C. J. I. Schielen, “Evaluation of 7 serum biomarkers and uterine artery doppler ultrasound for first-trimester prediction of preeclampsia: a systematic review,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 225–239, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Herraiz, D. Escribano, P. I. Gómez-Arriaga, J. M. Hernández-García, M. A. Herraiz, and A. Galindo, “Predictive value of sequential models of uterine artery Doppler in pregnancies at high risk for pre-eclampsia,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Kuc, M. P. Koster, J. L. Pennings et al., “Metabolomics profiling for identification of novel potential markers in early prediction of preeclampsia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e98540, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Austdal, R. B. Skrastad, A. S. Gundersen, R. Austgulen, A.-C. Iversen, and T. F. Bathen, “Metabolomic biomarkers in serum and urine in women with preeclampsia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e91923, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Sattar, A. Gaw, C. J. Packard, and I. A. Greer, “Potential pathogenic roles of aberrant lipoprotein and fatty acid metabolism in pre-eclampsia,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 614–620, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Rakheja, M. J. Bennett, B. M. Foster, R. Domiati-Saad, and B. B. Rogers, “Evidence for fatty acid oxidation in human placenta, and the relationship of fatty acid oxidation enzyme activities with gestational age,” Placenta, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 447–450, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. G. I. Thiele, K. E. Niezen-Koning, A. H. van Gennip, and J. G. Aarnoudse, “Increased plasma carnitine concentrations in preeclampsia,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 5, part 1, pp. 876–880, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Kuc, M. P. H. Koster, A. Franx, P. C. J. I. Schielen, and G. H. A. Visser, “Maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure and serum markers in early prediction of preeclampsia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e63546, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. A. Brown, M. D. Lindheimer, M. de Swiet, A. van Assche, and J.-M. Moutquin, “The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP),” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Zhang, H. Sun, and X. Wang, “Serum metabolomics as a novel diagnostic approach for disease: a systematic review,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 404, no. 4, pp. 1239–1245, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. O. Odibo, K. R. Goetzinger, L. Odibo et al., “First-trimester prediction of preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers: a discovery phase study,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 990–994, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. C. Kenny, D. I. Broadhurst, W. Dunn et al., “Robust early pregnancy prediction of later preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers,” Hypertension, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 741–749, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus