Review Article

A Significant Statistical Advancement on the Predictive Values of ERCC1 Polymorphisms for Clinical Outcomes of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Summary data on associations between ERCC1 polymorphisms and ORR, OS, and PFS of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Study (cases)TotalStudy (cases)AsianStudy (cases)Caucasian

ERCC1 C118T
 ORR
  CT + TT versus CC23 (3272)0.82 [0.71, 0.96]14 (2361)0.80 [0.67, 0.94]9 (911)0.93 [0.66, 1.30]
= 48.9%, = 61.9%, = 5.6%,
  CT versus CC16 (2023)0.73 [0.61, 0.89]9 (1499)0.69 [0.55, 0.85]7 (524)0.93 [0.62, 1.38]
= 9%, = 0%, = 16%,
  TT versus CC16 (1314)0.63 [0.47, 0.85]9 (985)0.64 [0.44, 0.93]7 (329)0.63 [0.39, 1.01]
= 19%, = 20%, = 30%,
 OS
  CT + TT versus CC16 (2734)1.25 [1.05, 1.50]8 (1949)1.24 [1.01, 1.53]8 (785)1.27 [0.88, 1.85]
= 69.2%, = 79.2%, = 53.4%,
  CT versus CC5 (1276)1.09 [0.86, 1.38]5 (1276)1.09 [0.86, 1.38]0
= 50%, = 50%,
  TT versus CC5 (1276)1.49 [1.18, 1.88]5 (1276)1.49 [1.18, 1.88]0
= 48%, = 48%,
 PFS
  CT + TT versus CC9 (943)1.11 [0.84, 1.47]3 (367)1.15 [0.86, 1.54]6 (576)1.06 [0.64, 1.75]
= 61.2%, = 50.4%, = 69.7%,
  CT versus CC1 (137)1.47 [0.91, 2.36]1 (137)1.47 [0.91, 2.36]0
  TT versus CC1 (137)1.86 [1.13, 3.07]1 (137)1.86 [1.13, 3.07]0
ERCC1C8092A
 ORR
  CA + AA versus CC11 (1607)0.87 [0.71, 1.07]8 (1279)0.76 [0.60, 0.96]3 (328)1.51 [0.95, 2.39]
= 56.1%, = 56.1%, = 0%,
  CA versus CC6 (793)0.71 [0.53, 0.96]6 (793)0.71 [0.53, 0.96]0
= 57%, = 57%,
  AA versus CC6 (529)0.42 [0.26, 0.70]6 (529)0.42 [0.26, 0.70]0
= 0%, = 0%,
 OS
  CA + AA versus CC5 (824)1.18 [0.77, 1.79]4 (705)1.37 [1.06, 1.75]1 (119)0.50 [0.33, 0.84]
= 77.6%, = 26.4%,
  CA versus CC4 (569)1.38 [1.03, 1.86]4 (569)1.38 [1.03, 1.86]0
= 0%, = 0%,
  AA versus CC4 (569)2.03 [1.19, 3.47]4 (569)2.03 [1.19, 3.47]0
= 54%, = 54%,
 PFS
  CA + AA versus CC1 (90)1.08 [0.72, 1.63]1 (90)1.08 [0.72, 1.63]