Review Article

Can the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Be Used to Determine Gastric Cancer Treatment Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Summary of the meta analysis results.

AnalysisReferencesFixed-effect modelRandom-effect modelHeterogeneityMeta regression
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)

Subgroup analysis for OS
 Subgroup: treatments
  Surgery12[13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 3032]2.01 (1.71–2.37)<0.0012.11 (1.72–2.57)<0.00126%0.190.207
  Chemotherapy4[20, 23, 29, 34]1.95 (1.83–2.08)<0.0011.84 (1.48–2.28)<0.00186%<0.001
  Mutlitherapy3[26, 27, 33]2.39 (1.84–3.11)<0.0012.39 (1.84–3.11)<0.0011%0.37
 Subgroup: region
  Western3[19, 21, 26]2.26 (1.74–2.94)<0.0012.10 (1.42–3.10)<0.00144%0.170.543
  Eastern16[13, 14, 18, 20, 2225, 2734]1.96 (1.85–2.08)<0.0011.96 (1.71–2.24)<0.00156%0.004
 Subgroup: sample size
  Sample size ≥ 2009[13, 14, 20, 24, 26, 30, 3234]1.69 (1.53–1.86)<0.0011.82 (1.55–2.13)<0.00145%0.070.034
  Sample size < 20010[18, 19, 2123, 25, 2729, 31]2.15 (2.00–2.31)<0.0012.15 (2.00–2.31)<0.0010%0.43
 Subgroup: cutoff value
  (1) Cutoff ≤ 2.25[13, 24, 28, 30, 33]1.80 (1.43–2.26)<0.0011.80 (1.43–2.26)<0.0010%0.430.112
  (2) 2.2 < cutoff ≤ 37[19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 34]1.96 (1.84–2.08)<0.0011.88 (1.56–2.26)<0.0010%0.47
  (3) 3 < cutoff ≤ 43[18, 26, 32]2.32 (1.85–2.89)<0.0012.31 (1.81–2.94)<0.00141%0.13
  (4) 4 < cutoff ≤ 54[14, 21, 27, 31]2.27 (1.59–3.26)<0.0012.36 (1.38–4.03)0.00254%0.09
 Subgroup: stage IV
  Resection2[30, 32]1.75 (1.30–2.36)<0.0011.73 (0.85–3.54)0.1383%0.02
  Chemotherapy3[18, 20, 26, 29, 34]1.94 (1.81–2.07)<0.0011.83 (1.49–2.24)<0.00190%<0.001

Clinicopathological parametersOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

TNM stage (I + II vs. III + IV)4[13, 19, 24, 31]2.59 (1.91–3.50)<0.0012.76 (1.36–5.61)0.00580%0.002
Tumor differentiation
(well versus poor)
3[13, 20, 30]1.05 (0.77–1.43)0.751.05 (0.77–1.44)0.740%0.38
CEA (<5 ng mL−1 versus ≥5 ng mL−1)2[23, 24]1.43 (0.64–3.21)0.381.31 (0.77–2.25)0.3252%0.15