Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Bladder Cancer

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8205836 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8205836

Molecular Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: Novel Potential Indicators of Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes

Academic Editor: Ja Hyeon Ku
Received17 Sep 2015
Revised29 Dec 2015
Accepted29 Dec 2015
Published26 Jan 2016


Although many clinical and molecular markers for predicting outcomes in bladder cancer (BC) have been reported, their application in clinical practice remains unclear. Bladder carcinogenesis has two distinct molecular pathways that direct the development of BC. FGFR3 mutations are common in low-grade BC, while TP53 mutation or loss of RB1 is associated with muscle-invasive BC. However, no tissue-based gene markers confirmed by prospective large-scale trials in BC have been used in clinical practice. Micro-RNA analyses of BC tissue revealed that miR-145 and miR- function as tumor suppressors, whereas miR-183 and miR-17-5p function as oncogenic miRNAs. In liquid biopsy, circulating tumor cells (CTC), exosomes, or cell-free RNA is extracted from the peripheral blood samples of cancer patients to analyze cancer prognosis. It was reported that detection of CTC was associated with poor prognostic factors. However, application of liquid biopsy in BC treatment is yet to be explored. Although several cell-free RNAs, such as miR-497 in plasma or miR-214 in urine, could be promising novel circulating biomarkers, they are used only for diagnosing BC as the case that now stands. Here, we discuss the application of novel biomarkers in evaluating and measuring BC outcomes.

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer is the most common cancer of the urinary tract, with an incidence rate of 350,000~380,000 cases being reported per year worldwide [1, 2]. Its main histological type is urothelial carcinoma. There are two clinical phenotypes of bladder cancer: (1) non-muscle- invasive bladder cancer and (2) muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Non-muscle-invasive cancers frequently recur at approximate rate of 50~70% and progress to muscle-invasive disease at rate of 1~2% and ~45% in low-grade and high-grade tumors, respectively [35]. Muscle-invasive cancers have a 5-year survival rate of <50% [6, 7]. As it stands now, treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is chiefly total cystectomy. Therapeutic methods against advanced bladder cancer are chemotherapies that mainly use cisplatin as the first-line treatment and have still not made significant progress for more than 20 years.

A set of clinical and pathological parameters are used for risk stratification in bladder cancer, such as number of tumors, size of the tumor, prior recurrence rate, T-stage, presence of carcinoma in situ, tumor grade, lymph node status, and variant histology. However, they are only limited to predicting clinical outcomes [8]. Novel therapies for advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer and established predictive biomarkers on response to them are yet to be identified. Hence, predictive biomarkers for the development of target therapy and novel therapies for advanced bladder cancer must be identified.

Here, we discuss the application of molecular predictive biomarkers in advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer as well as molecular markers of poor prognosis in postcystectomy patients. Moreover, we discuss the current findings of liquid biopsy in patients with advanced bladder cancer as well as those of histopathological analyses of primary bladder cancer.

2. Gene Abnormalities in Primary Bladder Cancer

Some theories on the putative molecular mechanism underlying bladder cancer have been demonstrated. Firstly, it is important to understand the molecular pathway of carcinogenesis in bladder cancer before exploring prognostic and predictive molecular markers of advanced bladder cancer. The concept of “field cancerization” was introduced in 1953, which is the theory of multicentric cancer origins [9]. A population of cells in morphologically normal epithelium possessed common genetic or epigenetic aberrations, similar to that observed in bladder cancer, which might provide a ground for multiple tumorigenesis [10]. On the other hand, the “clonal origin” theory states that bladder tumors arise from the uncontrolled spread of a single transformed cell that can grow independently with variable subsequent genetic alterations [11]. Since recent molecular biological approach showed various samples from metachronous and synchro-allopatric tumors could arise from monoclonal origin by analyses according to the pattern of X-chromosome inactivation, TP53 mutation, and loss of heterozygosity, “clonal origin” theory is currently supported on bladder cancer [1113]. Then, a family of genes has been characterized that follows this “two-hit” model including the two prototype suppressor genes: the retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) and TP53 genes [14]. It is now well established that accumulation of genetic alterations forms the basis for progression from a normal cell to a cancer cell, referred to as the process of multistep carcinogenesis [15, 16]. Recent analyses demonstrated that non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancers have distinct pathways in carcinogenesis. One pathway involves mutation of FGF receptor 3, thereby giving rise to low-grade non-muscle-invasive papillary tumors that frequently recur but seldom invade. In contrast, muscle-invasive bladder cancer and carcinoma in situ exhibit deletions or mutations of the TP53, RB1, ERBB2, or PTEN [16].

Originally, the HRAS gene was the first human oncogene identified from a human bladder cancer cell line. A point mutation alters the 12th amino acid of the HRAS oncogene product p21 [17]. It was reported that HRAS was frequently overexpressed in non-muscle-invasive cancer [18]. However, recent reports showed that the RAS genes mutations are present in only 1–13% of bladder cancer and less frequent in muscle-invasive cancer [1921]. Moreover, the RAS gene mutation was not a predictor for disease-specific survival [22].

FGFR3 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 3), a receptor tyrosine kinase, is one of the most frequently mutated genes in bladder cancer. The rate of mutation in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is 60–70% [2325]. FGFR3 plays a critical role in bladder cancer from low-grade stage [26], which is characterized by low levels of protein synthesis and high cell cycle gene activity [27]. However, its mutation is comparatively less common in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer at the time of diagnosis and has not been established to be as a prognostic biomarker in advanced bladder cancer.

TP53, a transcription factor, has many functions, such as induction of apoptosis, inhibition of cell proliferation, and arrest of the cell cycle. Nuclear accumulation of TP53 is a predicting factor of poor prognosis in advanced bladder cancer [28, 29]. In multivariable analyses of 692 patients with invasive cancer treated with radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy, TP53 expression was independently associated with disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality [30]. However, the authors mentioned that assessing TP53 expression has limited utility in patients with lymph node-positive bladder cancer. In addition, the TP53 gene alteration, which is a poor prognostic factor, is found in 53% of patients who underwent cystectomy [31].

The RB1, a tumor suppressor gene, is a negative regulator of the cell cycle, and its alterations are related to carcinogenesis in several cancers. Loss of RB1 expression is an adverse prognostic biomarker in muscle-invasive bladder cancer [32]. Bladder cancer with mutation of the RB1 gene exhibits low FGFR3 levels and is associated with significantly poor disease-specific survival [33]. The TSC1 is a tumor suppressor gene, located on chromosome 9q34. TSC1 is a negative regulator of mTOR signaling in complex with TSC2. Deletions of the long arm of chromosome 9 are the most common genetic alteration in bladder cancer. TSC1, and TSC2, which constitute the mTOR regulatory tuberous sclerosis complex, are mutated at a combined frequency of 15% [34]. Thus, everolimus might have activity in metastatic urothelial cancer patients who harbor the TSC1 mutation. The TSC1 mutation possibly has a causative role in the progression and this process is possibly related to the functional loss of p27 [35].

Other genes, such as the ERBB2/HER2 [36, 37] and PTEN [38], have been reported to be involved in the progression of advanced bladder cancer. Thus, the signaling pathway from receptors of tyrosine kinase to AKT/PI3K would definitely play a role in carcinogenesis and development of bladder cancer and other cancers. However, only analysis of promising single gene predictive biomarker in bladder cancer has limitations to apply to clinical practice. Further prospective evaluation would be required.

3. MicroRNA Expression in Primary Bladder Cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 18–24-nucleotide-long noncoding RNA that inhibit gene function by endogenous blocking. Several miRNAs are involved in carcinogenesis as tumor suppressor or oncogenic molecules.

miR-145, miR-143, and miR-125b are tumor suppressors that are downregulated in bladder cancer tissue, whereas miR-183, miR-96, miR-17-5p, and miR-20a are oncogenic miRNAs that are upregulated in bladder cancer tissue [39]. miR-145 is one of the most recurrently downregulated miRNAs in bladder cancer. miR-141 and miR-205 are poor prognostic biomarkers of overall survival in bladder cancer [40]. miR- expression is severely decreased in advanced cancer. Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (50%) with low miR- expression subsequently progressed, whereas 94% of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers with high expression did not progress [41].

4. “Liquid Biopsy” with Patients’ Blood Samples: Circulating Tumor Cells, Exosomes, and miRNAs (Figure 1)

Advanced technology uses patients’ blood or urine as samples instead of primary bladder cancer tissue to analyze bladder cancer prognosis and to explore novel prognostic or predictive biomarkers. Liquid biopsy involves the analyses of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, and circulating miRNAs in patients’ blood or urine in human cancers [42]. In the CORRECT analysis for advanced colorectal cancer, a high concordance was observed between plasma circulating DNA and tumor tissue for the KRAS and PIK3CA mutations [43]. We have been able to select the most effective drug to treat patients with advanced prostate cancer by the CTC assay, using patients’ peripheral blood samples. Detection of AR-V7 (Androgen-Receptor splice Variant 7 messenger RNA) in CTCs from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer may be associated with resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone [44].

The CTC assay has a potential role in the management of bladder cancer. Next-generation sequencing analysis showed somatic variant detection in 50% of patients with neoadjuvant bladder cancer [45]. At an early stage of diagnosis for bladder cancer, quantitation of CTC from blood and urine by FRα (folate receptor α) ligand-targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could be a promising method for diagnosis [46]. In addition, it was reported that detection of CTC was associated with poor prognostic factors. CTCs were detected in 20% of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and effectively predicted both time-to-recurrence and progression-free survival [47]. Another study showed that the presence of CTC in patients with metastatic bladder cancer was associated with poor survival. However, there was no difference in survival between the CTC-positive and CTC-negative patients with localized bladder cancer [48]. Preoperative CTCs in peripheral blood are detected in 23% of non-metastatic advanced bladder cancer. There was concordance between HER2 expression on CTC and the HER2 gene amplification status of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases in CTC-positive cases [49]. Their studies had limitations in the small sample size.

Exosomes are small (30–100 nm) membrane vesicles released into the extracellular environment on fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane [50]. Exosomes play several physiological roles, such as immune response modulation, presentation of antigens to immune cells, intercellular communication through transfer of proteins, mRNA, and miRNA. However, no in vivo research on exosomes has been reported for bladder cancer. Exosomes isolated from the urine of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in urothelial cells [51]. A new insight into the role of exosomes in transition of bladder cancer into muscle-invasive cancer was provided. Thus, exosome research in advanced bladder cancer could be a new platform for predicting progression and innovating targeted therapy.

miRNAs are found within cells and in serum and other body fluids. The function of these extracellular circulating miRNAs is not well understood. Extracellular miRNAs embedded in circulating exosomes serve as prognostic biomarkers in cancer. A number of plasma exosomal RNAs are reported as being diagnostic, prognostic, or even therapeutic biomarkers in cancer patients [52]. Circulating exosomal RNAs contain various RNA species and changes in exosomal RNA contents are robust candidates as clinical biomarkers for advanced prostate cancer [53, 54]. Circulating miR-497 and miR-663b in plasma were expressed with significant difference in bladder cancer [55]. Although these miRNAs could be promising novel circulating biomarkers, they are used for only diagnosing bladder cancer as the case now stands. Thus, circulating miRNAs in blood or urine could be biomarkers at several clinical stages, such as detection of bladder cancer, prediction of transition to muscle-invasive disease, or prediction of outcomes. However, urinary cell-free miR-214 or miR-155 has been reported to be used only as a diagnostic biomarker [56, 57], and few studies have reported the relationship between circulating miRNAs and bladder cancer.

In the near future, liquid biopsy detecting CTCs, exosomes, and miRNAs will serve as a tool to predict outcomes and to select effective targeted therapies. Although circulating cells and DNA analyses would be promising because of their convenient and minimally invasive procedures, they are limited by their sample collection methods, lack of sensitivity and specificity, or high costs.

5. Conclusions

Despite the impressive development of recent research on CTC, microRNA, and exosomes, our knowledge pertaining to the biology of bladder cancer lags behind that pertaining to other solid cancers. Therapeutic methods against advanced bladder cancer have still not made significant progress for more than 20 years, since chemotherapies mainly use cisplatin as the first-line treatment of choice for advanced bladder cancer. One of the reasons for this could be the dramatically different mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive high-grade cancer, which could complicate molecular research on bladder cancer. Establishment of molecular profiling from the context of large clinical trials is required to stratify patients before treatment with conventional chemotherapy. However, currently available data suggest that single biomarkers are inadequate for the surveillance of high-risk patients. Owing to this new angle, combinations of considerably different approaches, such as the use of epigenetic and genetic biomarkers, primary tissue and CTC samples, and genomics and proteomics, are being proposed for successful validation of a robust prediction tool for bladder cancer. Moreover, novel effective agents with the ability to increase the overall survival rate of bladder cancer need to be identified for clinical use.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


All authors thank Mitsuji Yoshida for his assistance with drawing the scheme.


  1. J. Ferlay, H.-R. Shin, F. Bray, D. Forman, C. Mathers, and D. M. Parkin, “Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 2893–2917, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. R. L. Griffiths, “Current perspectives in bladder cancer management,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 435–448, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. R. Prout Jr., B. A. Barton, P. P. Griffin et al., “Treated history of noninvasive grade 1 transitional cell carcinoma,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 148, no. 5 I, pp. 1413–1419, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. W. Herr, “Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome,” Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. J. Sylvester, A. P. van der Meijden, W. Oosterlinck et al., “Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 466–467, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. S. Soloway, “Bladder cancer: lack of progress in bladder cancer—what are the obstacles?” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–6, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Türkölmez, H. Tokgöz, B. Reşorlu, K. Köse, and Y. Bedük, “Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: predictive factors and prognostic difference between primary and progressive tumors,” Urology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 477–481, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Sapre, P. Herle, P. D. Anderson, N. M. Corcoran, and C. M. Hovens, “Molecular biomarkers for predicting outcomes in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder,” Pathology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 274–282, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. P. Slaughter, H. W. Southwick, and W. Smejkal, “‘Field cancerization’ in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Clinical implications of multicentric origin,” Cancer, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 963–968, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Muto, S. Horie, S. Takahashi, K. Tomita, and T. Kitamura, “Genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal bladder epithelium in patients with metachronous bladder cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 15, pp. 4021–4025, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  11. D. Sidransky, P. Frost, A. Von Eschenbach, R. Oyasu, A. C. Preisinger, and B. Vogelstein, “Clonal origin of bladder cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 326, no. 11, pp. 737–740, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Habuchi, R. Takahashi, H. Yamada, Y. Kakehi, T. Sugiyama, and O. Yoshida, “Metachronous multifocal development of urothelial cancers by intraluminal seeding,” The Lancet, vol. 342, no. 8879, pp. 1087–1088, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Takahashi, T. Habuchi, Y. Kakehi et al., “Clonal and chronological genetic analysis of multifocal cancers of the bladder and upper urinary tract,” Cancer Research, vol. 58, no. 24, pp. 5835–5841, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Cordon-Cardo and V. E. Reuter, “Alterations of tumor suppressor genes in bladder cancer,” Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  15. E. R. Fearon and B. Vogelstein, “A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis,” Cell, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 759–767, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. A. Knowles and C. D. Hurst, “Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. P. Feinberg, B. Vogelstein, M. J. Droller, S. B. Baylin, and B. D. Nelkin, “Mutation affecting the 12th amino acid of the c-Ha-ras oncogene product occurs infrequently in human cancer,” Science, vol. 220, no. 4602, pp. 1175–1177, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. Czerniak, G. L. Cohen, P. Etkind et al., “Concurrent mutations of coding and regulatory sequences of the Ha-ras gene in urinary bladder carcinomas,” Human Pathology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1199–1204, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. H. Jebar, C. D. Hurst, D. C. Tomlinson, C. Johnston, C. F. Taylor, and M. A. Knowles, “FGFR3 and Ras gene mutations are mutually exclusive genetic events in urothelial cell carcinoma,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 33, pp. 5218–5225, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Ouerhani and A. B. A. Elgaaied, “The mutational spectrum of HRAS, KRAS, NRAS and FGFR3 genes in bladder cancer,” Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 259–266, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. P. Sfakianos, E. K. Cha, G. Iyer et al., “Genomic characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma,” European Urology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 970–977, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. C. Kompier, I. Lurkin, M. N. M. van der Aa, B. W. G. van Rhijn, T. H. van der Kwast, and E. C. Zwarthoff, “FGFR3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS AND PIK3CA mutations in bladder cancer and their potential as biomarkers for surveillance and therapy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 11, Article ID e13821, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Billerey, D. Chopin, M.-H. Aubriot-Lorton et al., “Frequent FGFR3 mutations in papillary non-invasive bladder (pTa) tumors,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 1955–1959, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. W. G. van Rhijn, I. Lurkin, F. Radvanyi, W. J. Kirkels, T. H. Van der Kwast, and E. C. Zwarthoff, “The fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation is a strong indicator of superficial bladder cancer with low recurrence rate,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1265–1268, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. Bourdin, X. Sastre-Garau, D. Chopin, J. P. Thiery, and F. Radvanyi, “Frequent activating mutations of FGFR3 in human bladder and cervix carcinomas,” Nature Genetics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 18–20, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. W. G. van Rhijn, T. H. van der Kwast, L. Liu et al., “The FGFR3 mutation is related to favorable pT1 bladder cancer,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 310–314, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Lindgren, F. Liedberg, A. Andersson et al., “Molecular characterization of early-stage bladder carcinomas by expression profiles, FGFR3 mutation status, and loss of 9q,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 2685–2696, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Esrig, D. Elmajian, S. Groshen et al., “Accumulation of nuclear p53 and tumor progression in bladder cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 331, no. 19, pp. 1259–1264, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. Malats, A. Bustos, C. M. Nascimento et al., “P53 as a prognostic marker for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis and review,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 678–686, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. F. Shariat, C. Bolenz, P. I. Karakiewicz et al., “p53 expression in patients with advanced urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder,” BJU International, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 489–495, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. A. Karam, Y. Lotan, P. I. Karakiewicz et al., “Use of combined apoptosis biomarkers for prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. F. Shariat, H. Tokunaga, J. Zhou et al., “p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1014–1024, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Lindgren, G. Sjödahl, M. Lauss et al., “Integrated genomic and gene expression profiling identifies two major genomic circuits in urothelial carcinoma,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 6, Article ID e38863, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Sjödahl, M. Lauss, S. Gudjonsson et al., “A systematic study of gene mutations in urothelial carcinoma; inactivating mutations in tsc2 and pik3r1,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e18583, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Adachi, M. Igawa, H. Shiina, S. Urakami, K. Shigeno, and O. Hino, “Human bladder tumors with 2-hit mutations of the tumor suppressor gene TSC1 and decreased expression of p27,” Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 601–604, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Eissa, H. S. Ali, A. H. Al Tonsi, A. Zaglol, and O. El Ahmady, “HER2/neu expression in bladder cancer: relationship to cell cycle kinetics,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 142–148, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. Bolenz, S. F. Shariat, P. I. Karakiewicz et al., “Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression status provides independent prognostic information in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder,” BJU International, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1216–1222, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. M. Platt, C. D. Hurst, C. F. Taylor, W. M. Gregory, P. Harnden, and M. A. Knowles, “Spectrum of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene alterations in bladder cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 6008–6017, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Yoshino, N. Seki, T. Itesako, T. Chiyomaru, M. Nakagawa, and H. Enokida, “Aberrant expression of microRNAs in bladder cancer,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 396–404, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Ratert, H.-A. Meyer, M. Jung et al., “miRNA profiling identifies candidate mirnas for bladder cancer diagnosis and clinical outcome,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 695–705, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. E. Rosenberg, J. Baniel, Y. Spector et al., “Predicting progression of bladder urothelial carcinoma using microRNA expression,” BJU International, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 1027–1034, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Hong and Y. Zu, “Detecting circulating tumor cells: current challenges and new trends,” Theranostics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 377–394, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. R. Thierry, F. Mouliere, S. El Messaoudi et al., “Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA,” Nature Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 430–435, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. S. Antonarakis, C. Lu, H. Wang et al., “AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 371, no. 11, pp. 1028–1038, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Alva, T. Friedlander, M. Clark et al., “Circulating tumor cells as potential biomarkers in bladder cancer,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 790–798, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. Qi, Y. Liu, R. Zhao et al., “Quantitation of rare circulating tumor cells by folate receptor α ligand-targeted PCR in bladder transitional cell carcinoma and its potential diagnostic significance,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 7217–7223, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. P. Gazzaniga, E. De Berardinis, C. Raimondi et al., “Circulating tumor cells detection has independent prognostic impact in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 1978–1982, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. T. W. Flaig, S. Wilson, A. van Bokhoven et al., “Detection of circulating tumor cells in metastatic and clinically localized urothelial carcinoma,” Urology, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 863–867, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Rink, F. K. Chun, R. Dahlem et al., “Prognostic role and HER2 expression of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients prior to radical cystectomy: a prospective study,” European Urology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 810–817, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. van Niel, I. Porto-Carreiro, S. Simoes, and G. Raposo, “Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. A. Franzen, R. H. Blackwell, V. Todorovic et al., “Urothelial cells undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition after exposure to muscle invasive bladder cancer exosomes,” Oncogenesis, vol. 4, article e163, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. X. Huang, M. Liang, R. Dittmar, and L. Wang, “Extracellular microRNAs in urologic malignancies: chances and challenges,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 14785–14799, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. X. Huang, T. Yuan, M. Liang et al., “Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer,” European Urology, vol. 67, pp. 33–41, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. S. Haflidadóttir and Y. Ceder, “Exosomal microRNAs as potential biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer,” European Urology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 42–43, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Du, D. Shi, L. Yuan et al., “Circulating miR-497 and miR-663b in plasma are potential novel biomarkers for bladder cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 10437, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Wang et al., “Downregulation of urinary cell-free microRNA-214 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 992–999, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu et al., “Direct quantitative detection for cell-free miR-155 in urine: a potential role in diagnosis and prognosis for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” Oncotarget, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Masayoshi Nagata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

3427 Views | 1464 Downloads | 31 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.