Review Article

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width: A Novel Predictive Indicator for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Table 3

Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and myocardial infarction (MI).

First author, journal, yearStudy designStudy populationMean follow-upMajor outcomesMajor limitations

(i) Tonelli et al. [20]
(ii) Circulation
(iii) 2008
Post hoc analysis4111 participants with hyperlipidemia and a history of myocardial infarction, age 21–75 yearsA median of 59.7 monthsThe top RDW quartile had a 56% increased risk of fatal coronary disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction when compared to subjects in the lowest quartile (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17–2.08)(i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
(ii) The samples cannot not be representative of the general population
(i) Chen et al. [51]
(ii) American Journal of Epidemiology
(iii) 2010
Prospective cohort3226 participants without history of stroke, coronary heart disease, or cancer, age>35 yearsA median of 15.9 yearsThe highest RDW quartile was 1.46 for all-cause mortality compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI: 1.17–1.81)(i) Few cases met the anemia criteria, which resulted in fairly wide confidence intervals
(ii) Not reported data on specific causes of non-CVD death
(iii) Only measured the RDW values once
(i) Zalawadiya et al. [52]
(ii) American Journal of Cardiology
(iii) 2010
Multiethnic cohort7556 participants, age 41.5–15.8 years10 yearsThe risk of being classified in the intermediate risk category of coronary heart disease was 53% greater (95% CI: 1.38–1.69, ) with each unit increase in RDW value(i) Actual cardiovascular events during a set follow-up period was unavailable
(i) Lee et al. [53]
(ii) Clinical Cardiology
(iii) 2013
Retrospective analysis1596 patients with acute myocardial infarction, mean age, 64.5 ± 11.9 years1634 ± 342 daysThe RDW levels were significantly higher in patients with 12-month major adverse cardiac events (13.8 ± 1.3% versus 13.3 ± 1.2%, )(i) Cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding factors
(ii) Not adjusted the RDW for nutrients (such as iron, folate, and vitamin B12)
(i) Arbel et al. [54]
(ii) Thrombosis and Haemostasis
(iii) 2014
Registry-based, retrospective cohort225,006 subjects from health registry, age ≥ 40 years5 yearsCompared to patients with a RDW of 13% or lower, patients with RDW > 17% had a HR of 3.83 (95% CI: 3.12–4.69, ) for all-cause mortality and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.04–1.42, ) for major adverse cardiac events(i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
(ii) Not reported data on specific causes of non-CVD death
(i) Skjelbakken et al. [125]
(ii) Journal of the American Heart Association
(iii) 2014
Prospective cohort25,612 participants with no previous myocardial infarction, mean age 40.2–52.8 years15.8 yearsThere was a linear association between RDW and risk of myocardial infarction, for which a 1% increment in RDW was associated with a 13% increased risk (HR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07–1.19)(i) The RDW measure was not repeated, there remained random measurement error
(ii) Participants may underestimate the true prevalence of diabetes
(i) Sun et al. [22]
(ii) Cardiology
(iii) 2014
Prospective cohort691 patients with STEMI, free of heart failure41.8 monthsHigh RDW was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.17–8.32; )(i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
(ii) The sample size was relatively small
(i) Sahin et al. [126]
(ii) Medical Principles and Practice
(iii) 2015
Cross-sectional study335 patients with NSTEMI, age 50–79 yearsA median of 18 ± 11 monthsThe RDW levels of patients were significantly higher in the high SYNTAX group than in the low SYNTAX group (15.2 ± 1.8 versus 14.2 ± 1.2, )(i) The sample size was relatively small
(ii) Only measured hemoglobin levels, but not other factors such as iron, vitamin B12 and folate
(i) Sahin et al. [126]
(ii) Clinics
(iii) 2015
Cross-sectional study251 adult patients with NSTEMI over a 1-year period, age >50 yearsThe RDW was higher in the group with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with the patient group with unstable angina (14.6 ± 1.0 versus 13.06 ± 1.7, resp., )(i) The sample size was relatively small
(ii) Only Hb levels were measured in the study