Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 8583121 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8583121

Alexander Koch, Eray Yagmur, Janine Linka, Fabienne Schumacher, Jan Bruensing, Lukas Buendgens, Ulf Herbers, Ger H. Koek, Ralf Weiskirchen, Christian Trautwein, Frank Tacke, "High Circulating Caspase-Cleaved Keratin 18 Fragments (M30) Indicate Short-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Patients", Disease Markers, vol. 2018, Article ID 8583121, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8583121

High Circulating Caspase-Cleaved Keratin 18 Fragments (M30) Indicate Short-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Academic Editor: Emilia Hadziyannis
Received21 Mar 2018
Accepted06 Jun 2018
Published08 Jul 2018


Caspase-cleaved fragments of the intermediate filament protein keratin 18 (cytokeratin-18 (CK18)) can be detected in serum as M30 levels and may serve as a circulating biomarker indicating apoptosis of epithelial and parenchymal cells. In order to evaluate M30 as a biomarker in critical illness, we analyzed circulating M30 levels in 243 critically ill patients (156 with sepsis, 87 without sepsis) at admission to the medical intensive care unit (ICU), in comparison to healthy controls (). M30 levels were significantly elevated in ICU patients compared with healthy controls. Circulating M30 was closely associated with disease severity but did not differ between patients with sepsis and ICU patients without sepsis. M30 serum levels were correlated with biomarkers of inflammation, cell injury, renal failure, and liver failure in critically ill patients. Patients that died at the ICU showed increased M30 levels at admission, compared with surviving patients. A similar trend was observed for the overall survival. Regression analyses confirmed that M30 levels are associated with mortality, and patients with M30 levels above 250.8 U/L displayed an excessive short-term mortality. Thus, our data support the utility of circulating levels of the apoptosis-related keratin fragment M30 as a prognostic biomarker at ICU admission.

1. Background

Excessive systemic inflammation as a consequence of massive innate immune cell activation is a key characteristic in critically ill patients. This is triggered by infection-related molecules, termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and by the release of endogenous immunogenic signals, termed danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [1]. Activated innate immune cells release abundant inflammatory cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor and interleukins) that initiate inflammatory and also cell death signaling cascades in immune cells and parenchymal cells [2]. While excessive systemic inflammation is well recognized as a major driver of multiple organ failure and mortality in critical illness [3], the resulting mode of cell death, such as necrosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, or ferroptosis, is incompletely understood [4]. Nonetheless, targeting apoptotic pathways has been suggested as a potential novel therapeutic approach in sepsis therapy [57].

The systemic release of caspase-cleaved fragments of keratin 18 (K18), a major type I intermediate filament protein of the cytoskeleton, has been identified as a specific biomarker reflecting apoptotic cell death. K18 occurs in all single-layer epithelial cells such as the gut, urinary tract, or respiratory tract and in parenchymal cells like hepatocytes or cholangiocytes [8]. The caspase-cleaved K18 fragment exposes a circulating neoepitope that is recognized by the specific monoclonal antibody M30, which has been widely described as a valid biomarker in the context of acute and chronic liver diseases [8, 9]. Few data exist on M30 levels in critical illness. Four independent observational studies in patients with sepsis, two of them conducted in small patient cohorts, reported consistently elevated M30 levels compared with controls as well as an association with adverse clinical outcome [1013]. However, it is currently less well defined if the clinical utility and prognostic relevance of M30 as a biomarker can be extrapolated to heterogeneous cohorts of critically ill patients, in which not only infectious threats (PAMPs) but also sterile inflammation (DAMPs) trigger cell death mechanisms [1]. We therefore studied circulating M30 in a large cohort of 243 critically ill patients at a medical intensive care unit (ICU), in comparison to healthy controls, and assessed its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in medical ICU patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Characteristics

In our single-center prospective observational trial, we serially gathered data and blood samples of consecutive patients upon admission to the medical ICU in the University Hospital Aachen, Germany. We excluded patients who had an elective procedure or were admitted for postinterventional observational stays [14]. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee and undertaken in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki (ethics committee of the University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, reference number EK 150/06). We secured written informed consent from the patient, the spouse, or the legal guardian according to the German civil code BGB §1896. The patients were categorized as sepsis and nonsepsis according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [15] and were treated following the current guidelines for treatment of sepsis (Surviving Sepsis Campaign) [16]. As a control cohort, we included healthy blood donors with normal blood count, normal values of liver enzymes, and a negative serology for viral hepatitis and HIV.

To assess the patients’ outcome, we defined the ICU mortality as well as overall mortality, which was based on contacting the patients, relatives, and/or their general practitioners in approximately 6-month intervals after discharge from hospital for two years [17]. Short-term mortality was defined as mortality within 30 days after admission to the ICU, independent from whether the patients died at the ICU, in the hospital, or outside the hospital.

2.2. M30 Measurements

We obtained blood samples immediately at the time of admission to avoid influence of any therapeutic procedures. After centrifugation, serum was stored at −80°C. M30 was analyzed with a commercial enzyme immunoassay (M30 Apoptosense® ELISA, cat. number 10011, TECOmedical Group, Sissach, Germany).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Because most samples were not normally distributed, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to test for statistically significant differences between two groups. Correlations were assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation method. All values, including outside values as well as far-out values, were included. values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

The Cox regression model was employed to evaluate the prognostic value of M30 on the outcome. Furthermore, the survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a M30 cut-off level that had been calculated via the Youden Index [18]. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (SPSS; Chicago, Illinois).

3. Results

3.1. M30 Levels Are Significantly Elevated in ICU Patients Compared with Healthy Controls but Are Not Related to Sepsis

Circulating M30 levels were significantly increased in critically ill patients (, median 178.3 U/L, range 16.7–1001 U/L, Table 1) compared to the healthy control group (, median 107.1 U/L, range 48.3–217.1 U/L, , Figure 1(a)). A total of patients fulfilled the sepsis criteria, mostly with a pulmonary focus (). Nonsepsis patients () were admitted due to cardiopulmonary disorders (), decompensated liver cirrhosis (), acute pancreatitis (), and other conditions (Table 2). M30 levels did not differ between patients with sepsis (median 161.8 U/L, range 21.6–1000 U/L) and critical illness without sepsis (median 193.6 U/L, range 16.7–1001 U/L, Table 1, Figure 1(b)).

ParameterAll patientsNonsepsisSepsis

Sex (male/female)154/8955/3299/57
Age median (range) (years)64 (18–90)61 (18–85)65 (21–90)
APACHE II score median (range)18 (2–43)17 (2–34)19 (3–43)
ICU days median (range)7 (1–70)5 (1–44)10 (1–70)
Death during ICU n (%)64 (26%)15 (17%)49 (31%)
Death during follow-up (total) n (%)115 (47%)29 (33%)86 (55%)
Mechanical ventilation n (%)168 (69%)55 (63%)113 (72%)
Preexisting diabetes n (%)73 (30%)30 (35%)43 (28%)
Preexisting cirrhosis n (%)25 (10%)16 (18%)9 (6%)
BMI median (range) (m2/kg)25.9 (15.3–86.5)25.4 (15.9–53.3)26.0 (15.3–86.5)
WBC median (range) (×103/μL)12.8 (0–208)11.9 (2.5–27.7)13.1 (0–208)
CRP median (range) (mg/dL)93 (0–230)18 (5–230)153.3 (0–230)
Procalcitonin median (range) (μg/L)1.2 (0–207.5)0.35 (0.03–100)3.4 (0–207.5)
Creatinine median (range) (mg/dL)1.3 (0–21.6)1.0 (0.2–15)1.6 (0–21.6)
INR median (range)1.17 (0–133)1.15 (0.9–6.73)1.18 (0–133)
M30 median (range) (U/L)178.3 (16.7–1001)161.8 (21.6–1000)193.6 (16.7–1001)

For quantitative variables, median and range (in parenthesis) are given.


Etiology of sepsis critical illness
Site of infection n (%)
 Pulmonary84 (54%)
 Abdominal27 (17%)
 Urogenital10 (6%)
 Other35 (23%)
Etiology of nonsepsis critical illness n (%)
Cardiopulmonary disorder29 (33%)
Exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3 (3.5%)
Acute pancreatitis11 (13%)
Acute liver failure2 (2%)
Decompensated liver cirrhosis13 (15%)
Severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage7 (8%)
Neurological diseases4 (4.5%)
Intoxication3 (3.5%)
Ketoacidosis/diabetic coma5 (6%)
Vasculitis3 (3.5%)
Nonsepsis other7 (8%)

3.2. M30 Serum Concentrations Are Associated with Disease Severity

To identify critical factors that impact M30 levels, we conducted correlation analyses with scoring systems for disease severity as well as with clinically established laboratory parameters representing disease severity (Table 3). We observed significant correlations between circulating M30 levels at admission and clinical scores for disease severity such as the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health II (APACHE II) (, , Figure 1(c)), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), or Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) (Table 3). A positive association was also observed between M30 levels and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR, Figure 1(d)), which had been identified as a marker of systemic inflammation and poor prognosis in critically ill patients [19].

ParametersICU patients

Disease severity
APACHE II score0.311<0.001
SOFA score0.390<0.001
SAPS2 score0.2900.018
Renal function
GFR (creatinine)−0.2240.003
Cystatin C0.292<0.001
GFR (cystatin C)−0.285<0.001
Uric acid0.1580.027
Liver function
Bilirubin (conjugated)0.515<0.001
Gamma GT0.337<0.001
Alkaline phosphatase0.300<0.001
Prothrombin time−0.391<0.001
Antithrombin III−0.420<0.001

Nonsignificant correlations were noted for M30 levels with blood count, sodium, potassium, magnesium, amylase, lipase, creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D, parameters of mechanical ventilation, and central venous pressure.
3.3. M30 Levels Are Correlated with Biomarkers of Liver Failure, Renal Failure, Inflammation, and Cell Injury in Critically Ill Patients

Furthermore, we found strong correlations between M30 levels and biomarkers that reflect hepatic and renal dysfunction (Table 3). More precisely, circulating M30 levels correlated with markers indicating the hepatic biosynthetic capacity (e.g., international normalized ratio (INR), antithrombin III, and pseudocholinesterase), parenchymal damage (e.g., glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase) and parameters indicating cholestasis (e.g., gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin, Figure 1(e)) as well as markers tracing renal dysfunction (e.g., creatinine, cystatin C, and glomerular filtration rate). In addition, circulating M30 levels showed to correlate with parameters of systemic inflammation (e.g., tumor necrosis factor, interleukins 6 and 10, and procalcitonin) and to the general cell injury marker lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, , ).

3.4. Patients with Underlying Liver Cirrhosis Have Significantly Elevated M30 Levels

M30 was indicated to be increased in patients with hepatic dysfunction [11, 20]. In accordance, patients admitted to the ICU with liver cirrhosis (, median 391.4 U/L, range 19.4–1000) had significantly increased M30 levels compared to critically ill patients without cirrhosis (, median 171 U/L, range 16.7–1001, , Figure 1(f)). Although M30 levels had been specifically linked to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [9], M30 serum concentrations in our study were not associated with obesity (M30 in patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2 median 155.7 U/L versus BMI < 30 kg/m2 median 177.8 U/L, not significant).

3.5. High M30 Serum Concentrations Are Associated with Excessive Short-Term Mortality

We found increased M30 levels at admission in those patients who died at the ICU (, median 324.9 U/L, range 16.7–1000 U/L), compared with surviving patients (, median 166.5 U/L, range 21.6–1001 U/L, ; Figure 2(a)). Using Cox regression analysis, high M30 levels significantly predicted ICU mortality (). Kaplan-Meyer curves were generated by applying the optimal cut-off value (M30 of 250.8 U/L) for the best ratio of sensitivity and specificity for mortality using the Youden index, displaying the prognostic value of high M30 levels for short-term mortality (Figure 2(b)). We detected a trend but no significant difference in M30 levels regarding the overall mortality (nonsurvivors , median 251 U/L, range 16.7–1000 U/L versus survivors , median 166.5 U/L, range 21.6–1001 U/L, ; Figure 2(c)). However, Cox regression analysis remained significant for predicting overall survival as well (), and Kaplan-Meier curves displayed a separation between patients with high versus low M30 levels in their overall survival (Figure 2(d)). The validity and performance of M30 as a biomarker to predict ICU or overall survival in critically ill patients are summarized in Table 4.

ICU mortalityOverall mortality

M30 (U/L) optimal cut-off250.8250.8
Positive predictive value0.410.63
Negative predictive value0.830.59
Youden index0.290.21
Diagnostic odds ratio3.342.79

LHR: likelihood ratio.

As visible from the Kaplan-Meier curve analyses, the majority of deaths that separated patients with high from low M30 levels occurred within the first 30 days. In fact, patients that died within the first 30 days had significantly higher M30 levels (, median 294.6 U/L, range 16.7–1000 U/L) than patients that survived (, median 166.5 U/L, range 21.6–1001 U/L, ). This difference remained significant at later time points (e.g., 60 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 360 days mortality) but was mainly driven by the difference within the first 30 days (detailed data not shown). In addition, this difference regarding M30 levels and 30 days mortality was significant also in the subgroup of sepsis patients (), while the smaller subgroup of nonsepsis patients showed a clear trend towards higher M30 levels in patients that died within 30 days after ICU admission ().

4. Discussion

During the apoptotic mode of cell death, caspases, intracellular proteases that cleave aspartate residues, become activated either via the intrinsic (mitochondrial release of cytochrome C) or the extrinsic (inflammatory cytokines and death receptors) pathway. The caspases 3, 7, and 9 mediate the early cleavage of the intermediate filament protein cytokeratin 18 in position 396DALD-S, which results in a neoepitope formation that can be detected in serum by the M30 antibody [8]. Our study revealed significantly elevated M30 serum levels in a heterogeneous cohort of critically ill medical patients in close association with disease severity, indicating that apoptosis is a common feature in critical illness and impacts prognosis. As expected, M30 levels correlated with biomarkers reflecting systemic inflammation, supporting that excessive innate immune cell activation is a main driver of programmed cell death. Our study clearly demonstrates that the serum apoptosis marker M30 is independent from the concomitant presence of sepsis. This contrasts previous reports from ICU patients, which have uniformly linked elevated M30 to the clinical course of sepsis [1013]. Independent from an infectious or noninfectious origin of critical illness, M30 levels correlated with markers of organ dysfunction and disease severity in our study. While these data suggest that hepatocyte apoptosis contributes to circulating M30 in critical illness [2], additional cellular sources might include other epithelial cells, the kidney [21, 22], or the gastrointestinal epithelium [23]. As demonstrated in mouse models [24], a substantial quantity of apoptosis in critical illness proceeds in the gut [25], supporting a role of the gut in critical illness by translocation of bacteria through a disrupted intestinal epithelial barrier, alteration of intestinal immune tissue, and changes in intestinal microflora [23, 26]. Altogether, our data emphasize that not only hypoxia- or hypoperfusion-triggered necroses determine the prognosis in critically ill patients but also apoptotic pathways that are being boosted by systemic inflammation.

Notably, M30 levels are already quite widely used as a biomarker in chronic liver disorders, especially in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [8]. In our study, we observed the highest M30 levels in patients with hepatic dysfunction and/or liver cirrhosis. This is well in line with previous studies reporting massively elevated M30 levels in patients with acute liver failure [27], acute-on-chronic liver failure [20], and decompensated liver cirrhosis [9]. These associations emphasize the crucial role of the hepatic function for the prognosis in critical illness, as the assessment of liver failure is already included in several prognostic ICU scores such as the SOFA score [2].

In our study, circulating M30 was an early predictor of adverse outcome upon admission of medical patients to the ICU. M30 levels are correlated to disease severity, organ failure, and short-term mortality at the ICU, independent of the presence of sepsis. Our findings indicate a broad clinical relevance of apoptosis in critically ill patients and give impulses for further research. With its strong prognostic value already at ICU admission, M30 is likely to improve risk assessment, if included in novel multimarker panels or clinical scoring systems.

Furthermore, the association between high circulating M30 and increased mortality at the ICU in our study implies that a transient inhibition of apoptotic pathways could potentially reduce the excessive short-term mortality in these patients. While no such clinical trials, stratified by M30 levels, are available in critically ill patients, experimental evidence from animal models suggests that prevention of apoptosis might improve survival in endotoxemia and sepsis [7]. A selective caspase 3 as well as a pan-caspase inhibitor reduced mortality in a mouse model of polymicrobial sepsis, but this effect has been primarily linked to apoptosis of lymphocytes [28]. Similarly, hydrodynamic injection of small interfering RNA (siRNA) against either the Fas death receptor or caspase-8, which effectively targets hepatocytes, reduced mortality in septic mice [29]. On the other hand, apoptosis is a physiological process essential for tissue regeneration as well as a crucial regulator preventing persistent (over-) activation of immune cells, making it challenging to therapeutically interfere with this complex and incompletely understood network [5, 30].

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that circulating levels of the apoptosis-related keratin fragment M30 are significantly elevated in critically ill patients as compared with healthy controls, independent of the presence of sepsis. M30 levels are correlated with clinical scoring systems for disease severity as well as biomarkers indicating organ dysfunction and inflammation. The remarkably high levels in patients with cirrhosis and the association with liver function tests indicate that hepatocyte apoptosis might contribute substantially to high circulating M30 in critically ill patients. M30 levels above 250.8 U/L at admission to the ICU indicate an unfavourable short-term prognosis. Further research may explore how this biomarker could be implemented in a multimarker risk assessment panel at the ICU or help in guiding interventional strategies targeting apoptotic pathways in critical illness.

Data Availability

All data are available upon request to the corresponding author, except for data that could possibly link individual patients to the experimental measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The M30 ELISA kits were a kind gift from the TECOmedical Group. The authors disclose no further competing interests.


This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Ta434/5-1 and SFB/TRR57) and the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen.


  1. K. C. Ma, E. J. Schenck, M. A. Pabon, and A. M. K. Choi, “The role of danger signals in the pathogenesis and perpetuation of critical illness,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 300–309, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. Strnad, F. Tacke, A. Koch, and C. Trautwein, “Liver—guardian, modifier and target of sepsis,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. G. Chousterman, F. K. Swirski, and G. F. Weber, “Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 517–528, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Aziz, A. Jacob, and P. Wang, “Revisiting caspases in sepsis,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 5, no. 11, article e1526, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. E. Wesche-Soldato, R. Z. Swan, C. S. Chung, and A. Ayala, “The apoptotic pathway as a therapeutic target in sepsis,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 493–500, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Huttunen and J. Aittoniemi, “New concepts in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia and sepsis,” The Journal of Infection, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 407–419, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Harjai, J. Bogra, M. Kohli, and A. B. Pant, “Is suppression of apoptosis a new therapeutic target in sepsis?” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  8. N. O. Ku, P. Strnad, H. Bantel, and M. B. Omary, “Keratins: biomarkers and modulators of apoptotic and necrotic cell death in the liver,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 966–976, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Mazzolini, J. P. Sowa, and A. Canbay, “Cell death mechanisms in human chronic liver diseases: a far cry from clinical applicability,” Clinical Science, vol. 130, no. 23, pp. 2121–2138, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. A. Roth, C. Krenn, M. Brunner et al., “Elevated serum levels of epithelial cell apoptosis-specific cytokeratin 18 neoepitope m30 in critically ill patients,” Shock, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 218–220, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Hofer, T. Brenner, C. Bopp et al., “Cell death serum biomarkers are early predictors for survival in severe septic patients with hepatic dysfunction,” Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 3, article R93, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Lorente, M. M. Martín, A. F. González-Rivero et al., “Serum levels of caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 and mortality are associated in severe septic patients: pilot study,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, article e109618, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. J. Moore, A. Greystoke, F. Butt et al., “A pilot study assessing the prognostic value of CK18 and nDNA biomarkers in severe sepsis patients,” Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 179–187, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Koch, R. Weiskirchen, J. Kunze et al., “Elevated asymmetric dimethylarginine levels predict short- and long-term mortality risk in critically ill patients,” Journal of Critical Care, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 947–953, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Singer, C. S. Deutschman, C. W. Seymour et al., “The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3),” JAMA, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 801–810, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Rhodes, L. E. Evans, W. Alhazzani et al., “Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 304–377, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Koch, S. Voigt, C. Kruschinski et al., “Circulating soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is stably elevated during the first week of treatment in the intensive care unit and predicts mortality in critically ill patients,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 1, article R63, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Buendgens, E. Yagmur, J. Bruensing et al., “C-terminal proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) is associated with organ failure and predicts mortality in critically ill patients,” Journal of Intensive Care, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 25, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Backes, K. F. van der Sluijs, D. P. Mackie et al., “Usefulness of suPAR as a biological marker in patients with systemic inflammation or infection: a systematic review,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1418–1428, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Adebayo, V. Morabito, F. Andreola et al., “Mechanism of cell death in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a clinico-pathologic-biomarker study,” Liver International, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2564–2574, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. G. Chu and L. M. Weiss, “Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms,” Histopathology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 403–439, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. A. Roth, D. Lebherz-Eichinger, H. J. Ankersmit et al., “Increased total cytokeratin-18 serum and urine levels in chronic kidney disease,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 412, no. 9-10, pp. 713–717, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. S. Hotchkiss, R. E. Schmieg Jr., P. E. Swanson et al., “Rapid onset of intestinal epithelial and lymphocyte apoptotic cell death in patients with trauma and shock,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 3207–3217, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Hiramatsu, R. S. Hotchkiss, I. E. Karl, and T. G. Buchman, “Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) induces apoptosis in thymus, spleen, lung, and gut by an endotoxin and TNF-independent pathway,” Shock, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 247–253, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. A. Clark and C. M. Coopersmith, “Intestinal crosstalk: a new paradigm for understanding the gut as the "motor" of critical illness,” Shock, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 384–393, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. W. Haak and W. J. Wiersinga, “The role of the gut microbiota in sepsis,” The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. P. Bechmann, C. Jochum, P. Kocabayoglu et al., “Cytokeratin 18-based modification of the MELD score improves prediction of spontaneous survival after acute liver injury,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 639–647, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. S. Hotchkiss, K. C. Chang, P. E. Swanson et al., “Caspase inhibitors improve survival in sepsis: a critical role of the lymphocyte,” Nature Immunology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 496–501, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. E. Wesche-Soldato, C. S. Chung, J. Lomas-Neira, L. A. Doughty, S. H. Gregory, and A. Ayala, “In vivo delivery of caspase-8 or Fas siRNA improves the survival of septic mice,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2295–2301, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. S. Hotchkiss and D. W. Nicholson, “Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 813–822, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Alexander Koch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.