Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 2696173 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2696173

Mattia Bellan, Arnaldo Dimagli, Cristina Piccinino, Ailia Giubertoni, Aurora Ianniello, Federico Grimoldi, Maurizio Sguazzotti, Alessandra Nerviani, Michela Barini, Alessandro Carriero, Carlo Smirne, Michela Emma Burlone, Cristina Rigamonti, Rosalba Minisini, Livia Salmi, Matteo Nazzareno Barbaglia, Luigi Mario Castello, Daniele Sola, Paolo Marino, Gian Carlo Avanzi, Mario Pirisi, Pier Paolo Sainaghi, "Role of Gas6 and TAM Receptors in the Identification of Cardiopulmonary Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis and Scleroderma Spectrum Disorders", Disease Markers, vol. 2020, Article ID 2696173, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2696173

Role of Gas6 and TAM Receptors in the Identification of Cardiopulmonary Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis and Scleroderma Spectrum Disorders

Academic Editor: Roberta Rizzo
Received03 Aug 2019
Accepted24 Apr 2020
Published12 May 2020


Background. Few biomarkers are available for early identification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SS) and scleroderma spectrum disorders (SSD). Aims. To evaluate Gas6, sAxl, and sMer as biomarkers for cardiopulmonary complications of SS and SSD. Methods. In a cross-sectional observational study, we recruited 125 consecutive patients, affected by SS and SSD and referred to a tertiary-level pulmonary hypertension outpatient clinic. All patients underwent a comprehensive evaluation for identification of PAH and ILD. Gas6, sMer, and sAxl concentrations were measured with ELISA protocols, and concentrations were compared according to PAH or ILD. Results. Nineteen subjects had pulmonary hypertension (PH) (14 PAH), and 39 had ILD (6 severe). Plasma sMer was increased in PAH (18.6 ng/ml IQR [11.7-20.3]) with respect to the absence (12.4 [8.0-15.8]) or other form of pulmonary hypertension (9.6 [7.4-12.5]; K–W variance ). Conversely, Gas6 and sAxl levels were slightly increased in mild ILD (25.8 ng/ml [19.5-32.1] and 24.6 [20.1-32.5]) and reduced in severe ILD (16.6 [15.0-22.1] and 15.5 [14.9-22.4]) in comparison to no evidence of ILD (23.4 [18.8-28.1] and 21.6 [18.1-28.4]; K–W, ). Plasma has 50% sensitivity and 92% specificity in PAH identification (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.697, ). Values of and of have 100% and 67% sensitivity and 47% and 86% specificity, respectively, in identifying severe ILD (Gas6 AUC 0.787, ; sAxl AUC 0.705, ). Conclusions. The assay of Gas6 sAxl and sMer may be useful to help in the identification of PAH and ILD in SS and SSD patients. The Gas6/TAM system seems to be relevant in cardiopulmonary complications of SS and SSD and merits further investigations.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are severe and potentially life-threatening complications of systemic sclerosis (SS) and scleroderma spectrum disorders (SSD), as mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD) and SS overlap with other connective tissue diseases (CTDs) [1].

PAH is defined by the presence of a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) equal to or greater than 25 mmHg and a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) equal to or less than 15 mmHg, assessed during invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest [2]. PAH associated with CTD (CTD-PAH) has been reported from 20% to 30% in SS and SSD [3], and its prognosis is even poorer than that of the idiopathic form of PAH (IPAH) [4]. Indeed, an early diagnosis and a well-timed treatment are able to improve the prognosis in this setting [5]. Currently, the two-step algorithm (DETECT) is the most widely used screening tool for SS patients [6], but the search for novel biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic significance is still warranted.

Connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) are a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by chronic inflammation and/or parenchymal fibrosis within the contest of CTD [7, 8]. The complex diagnostic approach and the faintness of diagnostic criteria make the estimation of CTD-ILD prevalence very difficult, ranging from 15% to 90% according to different series [911]. The presence of a severe ILD is one of the most prominent negative prognostic factor in the clinical course of a CTD, being the most frequent cause of death in SS [12]. As for PAH, the early detection of lung involvement and the stratification of the risk of fibrosis progression are quintessential for modifying prognosis with early, appropriate treatment.

Growth arrest specific 6 (Gas6) is a vitamin K-dependent protein, identified as ligand for a tyrosine-kinase receptors family, collectively named TAM (acronym of Tyro3, Axl, and Mer) [13]. TAM receptors are variably expressed in many tissues and can be found as a soluble form in the bloodstream (sTyro3, sAxl, and sMer, respectively) [14]. These soluble forms are the result of the proteolytic cleavage by two metalloproteinases, ADAMTS 17 and ADMATS 10, and probably act as decoy receptors for the ligands [13, 15]. The Gas6/TAM system is highly pleiotropic and involved in several functions: among them, it seems to have a relevant role in the regulation of inflammatory response [16, 17], tissue repair and fibrosis development [14], and vascular integrity [18, 19]. Consistently, an impairment of the Gas6/TAM system has been associated with the development of autoimmune diseases, as demonstrated by the murine model of triple knock-out for the TAM receptors [20].

On these bases, Gas6 and its soluble receptors have been proposed as biomarkers in different human conditions [21, 22], specifically in autoimmune diseases [2326]. In the present study, we aim to evaluate Gas6 and sAxl and sMer as potential biomarkers for cardiopulmonary complications of SS and SSD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We performed a cross-sectional observational study. From October 1, 2016, to April 20, 2018, we recruited one hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients, affected by SS and SSD and referred to the Pulmonary Hypertension Outpatient Clinic of the Cardiology Department, A.O.U. “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee and conducted in strict accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

We included all the consecutive patients willing to participate, with one of the following diagnoses: (i)SS according to 2013 ACR/Eular classification criteria [27], including overlap with other rheumatic diseases(ii)MCTD according to Kasukawa criteria [28]

We applied the following exclusion criteria: (a)(b)Impossibility to undergo the required cardiopulmonary assessment

The design of the present cross-sectional observational study and part of the methods were already been described elsewhere [29].

2.2. Procedures

All patients underwent a comprehensive medical history, including the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, rheumatologic disease, and drug history. A physical examination was performed by an experienced clinician; anthropometric data were recorded.

The patients underwent an appropriate biochemistry panel. The serological profile of autoantibodies was recorded.

The assessment of each patient consisted of (i)12-lead electrocardiogram with 6-limb and 6 precordial leads with paper speed set at the standard rate of 25 mm/s(ii)Posteroanterior and lateral chest X rays(iii)Pulmonary function tests (PFTs): the test was performed using a standardized equipment and technique with a spirometer. The device was connected to a computer employing the software “Medisoft Expair 1.28.20”. The following standardized measurements were evaluated: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC% (also known as the Tiffeneau index). We also evaluated the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), measured with the single-breath Jones-Meade protocol. Once the mouthpiece and the nose clip were in place, the subject made a maximal expiration and then, with a maximal inspiration inhaled a gas blend containing carbon monoxide (0.3%) and other inert gases (0.3% CH4). Then, the patient was asked to hold his/her breath for about 10 seconds and exhale afterward. During the expiration, alveolar air was analyzed: the ratio between carbon monoxide in inspired gas and carbon monoxide in exhalated air determined the diffusion of carbon monoxide. Predicted DLCO was corrected for hemoglobin, and alveolar volume was assessed(iv)Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed using the Vivid 7 or E9 cardiovascular ultrasound machine by GE Medical Systems (Horten, Norway) with a 1.7/3.4 MHz tissue harmonic transducer. All data were obtained in standardized patient positions, according to the standards of the American Society of Echocardiography. The test was performed by an expert, pulmonary hypertension echocardiographer. The following parameters were generated [30]: systolic pulmonary pressure (sPAP), right atrium area (RAA), right ventricle diameter (RVD), and ejection fraction (EF). Right ventricle systolic function was evaluated by estimating the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE).

According to the application of international guidelines [2], those patients with a suspected PAH underwent right heart catherization (RHC, ). PAH was defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure , pulmonary capillary wedge , and pulmonary vascular wood units. Whenever contraindications to RHC occurred, pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed based on echocardiography-estimated and additional high probability criteria, according to 2015 ESC/ESR guidelines. [2].

Those patients with a clinical and instrumental suspicion of CTD-ILD underwent a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) () assessed by an expert, ILD radiologist. ILD was defined by the presence of ground glass opacities (GGO) and/or reticular pattern. Moreover, the extension of pulmonary fibrosis was measured with the Goh score [31] and a modified Kazerooni score [32]. When applying the Goh score, five thin-section CT slices were considered (level of origin of great vessels, tracheal carina, superior pulmonary veins, immediately above the right hemidiaphragm, and one halfway between the third and the fifth slices) and for each one, a quantitative assessment of fibrosis was performed. A mean value from the five sections was obtained. Following these assessments, patients were divided into two categories: limited ILD (fibrosis less than 10% or ranging from 10% to 30% with an FVC greater than 70%) and severe ILD (fibrosis greater than 30% or ranging from 10% to 30% with an FVC less than 70%) [31].

The modified Kazerooni score semiquantitatively evaluated the severity of fibrosis in each out of five slices, instead of three as described in the original paper, as follows: (0) no fibrosis, (1) , (2) , (3) fibrosis from 25% to 49%, (4) fibrosis from 50% to 75%, and (5) [32].

Gas6, sMer, and sAxl plasmatic concentrations were measured. Blood sample was drawn from each patient and collected in a 4 ml Vacutainer lavender K2-EDTA tube. Within an hour, the blood sample was centrifuged and then stored at -80°C.

Plasma sAxl concentration was measured using the DuoSet® ELISA R&D Systems DY154 commercial kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The aliquots were diluted 1 : 75 in PBS and bovine serum albumin 1% (reagent diluent). The dilution factor was chosen according to the previous experience of our laboratory.

Plasma sMer concentration was measured using the DuoSet® ELISA R&D Systems DY6488 commercial kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The samples were diluted 1 : 5 in reagent diluent, according to previous analysis in our laboratory.

Plasma Gas6 concentration was measured according to the protocol described by Alciato et al. for plasma [33] and other body fluids [34]. A 96-well plate (NUNC Products, Thermo Scientific Inc. MA, USA) was coated with the primary antibody, Goat-IgG anti-human Gas6 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA), and left incubated overnight at room temperature. The antigen was detected using a Goat-IgG biotinylated anti-human Gas6 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA), streptavidin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the chromogen tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The reaction was blocked with sulfuric acid 2N, and absorbance detected at 450 with a reference wavelength set at 570 nm. Optical density was fitted versus nominal concentration by applying a four-parameter logistic regression to the calibration curve prepared in BSA (bovine serum albumin, further purified fraction V, ≥98%, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical data were recorded in a database and analyzed by the statistical software package MedCalc v.18.10.2 (MedCalc Software, Broekstraat 52, 9030, Mariakerke, Belgium). The normality of Gas6, sMer, and sAxl distribution was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test; following the nonnormal distribution observed, we performed a nonparametrical analysis.

The measures of centrality and dispersion of data chosen were medians and interquartile range (IQR). Medians were compared between groups by the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis (K–W) and post hoc tests. Correlations between continuous variables were performed by Spearman’s rank test. To test the diagnostic performance of the studied biomarkers, receiver operating characteristics curves were built, with calculation of the respective areas under the curve (AUC). The level of significance chosen for all statistical analysis was 0.05 (two-tailed).

3. Results

Table 1 reports general features of the 125 patients enrolled; among patients affected by SS or SS overlap, 78% showed a limited cutaneous involvement. After evaluation of cardiopulmonary workup, 19 (15%) subjects received a diagnosis of PH, of whom 14 CTD-PAH, 2 PH due to the left heart, and 3 due to lung disease. Additionally, 39 (31%) patients were affected by ILD, which was characterized by a severe functional impairment in 6 (5%) of them.

Age, years66 [56-75]
Gender, F/M113/12
Disease duration, years8 [3-13]
Smoking status, no/past smoker/active smoker87(70)/20(16)/18(14)
Arterial hypertension66 (57)
COPD14 (11)
Cardiac disease21 (17)
Liver disease/liver cirrhosis18 (14)/0(0)
SS/MCTD/SS overlap94(75)/13(10)/18(15)
Digital ulcer (past/active)64(51)/13(10)
Arterial vasodilators: ERA/PDE5-I/iloprost18(14)/7(6)/60(48)

Abbreviations: F: female; M: male; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SS: systemic sclerosis; MCTD: mixed connective tissue disease; SSD: scleroderma spectrum disorder; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; ERA: endothelin receptor antagonist; PDE5-I: phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor; PDN: prednisone; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; MTX: methotrexate. Chronic heart failure and/or coronary artery disease.

Gas6, sAxl, and sMer median plasma levels were not different according to the extent of cutaneous involvement (limited vs diffuse), sex, disease duration (<5 vs ≥5 years), smoking status, liver disease, and immunosuppressive and vasodilator treatments ().

We compared the median values of Gas6, sAxl, and sMer according to the presence of pulmonary hypertension. Data are reported in Table 2. As evident, sMer plasma levels are increased in CTD-PAH, while Gas6 and sAxl were similar among groups. No significant correlation was observed between sMer and PAP either assessed by echocardiography or by RHC ().

ILDK–WPost hoc
No ()Mild ()Severe ()
Gas6 (ng/ml)23.4 [18.8-28.1]25.8 [19.5-32.1]16.6 [15.0-22.1]6.12, No vs mild
Mild vs severe
sAxl (ng/ml)21.6 [18.1-28.4]24.6 [20.1-32.5]15.5 [14.9-22.4]5.73, n.s.
sMer (ng/ml)12.9 [8.5-16.0]12.3 [8.1-16.6]7.4 [5.4-17.1]n.s.n.s.

PHK–WPost hoc
No ()CTD-PAH ()Other PH ()
Gas6 (ng/ml)23.3 [18.5-28.1]24.9 [18.8-33.9]23.5 [23.3-31.9]n.s.n.s.
sAxl (ng/ml)22.1 [18.2-30.1]24.8 [20.0-28.2]21.1 [15.6-23.3]n.s.n.s.
sMer (ng/ml)12.4 [8.0-15.8]18.6 [11.7-20.3]9.6 [7.4-12.5]6.44, No vs CTD-PAH

Abbreviations: ILD: interstitial lung disease; CTD-PAH: connective tissue disease-related pulmonary arterial hypertension; PH: pulmonary hypertension; K–W, Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance.

With respect to biomarker variations according to the presence of CTD-ILD, we observed a trend towards a slight increase of Gas6 and sAxl in mild ILD. Conversely, we observed a more evident reduction for both in severe ILD. sMer concentrations were similar among groups (also see Table 2). Notably, Gas6 and sAxl were related to the extent of ILD at CT scan measured with the modified Kazerooni score; in fact, a significant negative correlation with the extent of fibrosis is evident both for Gas6 (r: -0.46, ) and sAxl (r: -0.45, ).

We finally evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of sMer in diagnosing PAH; a sMer has a 50% sensitivity and a 92% specificity in diagnosing PAH (Figure 1(a)) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 44% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. Moreover, we evaluated Gas6 and sAxl diagnostic accuracy in the identification of ILD; a Gas6 has a 100% sensitivity, 47% specificity, 46% PPV, and 100% NPV; is 67% sensitive and 86% specific in identifying severe ILD in our population (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)) with 67% and 85% PPV and NPV, respectively.

4. Discussion

Patients affected by SS and/or SSD have a reduced life expectancy than age- and sex-related population; this is mainly determined by two severe cardiopulmonary complications, CTD-PAH and CTD-ILD [12]. Since a timely diagnosis is a sdeterminant to implement appropriate treatments to obtain better outcomes [5], a combination of biomarkers is warranted to increase the ability to screen patients at risk in addition to current methods.

We designed the present study to investigate the role of the measurement of Gas6 protein and of the soluble forms of its receptors Axl and Mer in plasma of patients with SS and SSD to identify either CTD-PAH or CTD-ILD; our data support the assay of sMer as biomarker of PAH in CTD patients. Conversely, Gas6 and sAxl determination might contribute to the identification of CTD-ILD. These results need to be discussed looking at the current literature evidences.

In our population, sMER concentration in plasma was increased in CTD-PAH, while neither that of Gas6 nor of sAxl was different according to this complication. Endothelial dysfunction is known to be a key impairment of CTD-PAH sustained by a mismatch of mediators acting as vasodilators in favour of vasoconstrictors; this process evolves with the activation of vascular remodelling towards an increase of vascular tone mediated by the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) activation [35]. Gas6/TAM interplay is known to be involved in vessel wall homeostasis: Gas6 was isolated from aortic endothelial cells, and it has a trophic effect on vessel walls; additionally, the Gas6/TAM system is activated in case of vessel damage or in human atherosclerotic plaque formation [14, 36]. Possibly, sMER increase in these patients could be an expression of endothelial stress and dysfunction, typical of PAH. One additional possible explanation comes from the other mainstay of the pathogenesis of CTD-PAH, the presence of persistent inflammation of pulmonary vessel walls [35]. TAM receptors, indeed, are involved in regulation of innate immunity, being upregulated in activated antigen-presenting cells (APCs) through type I interferon (IFN) signalling that determines the activation of suppressor of cytokine signalling proteins (SOCS1 and SOCS3) which, in turn, dampens the inflammatory response [37, 38]. Additionally, Gas6, through TAM receptors, limits proinflammatory cytokine production of APCs, through the inhibition of toll-like receptor (TLR) downstream signal [17]. In particular, Mer seems to be more relevant than Axl in apoptotic bodies’ recognition favouring phagocytosis/efferocytosis and in the reduction of proinflammatory cytokine production in vitro and in vivo models [39, 40]. Therefore, the elevation of sMer in these patients may be the combination of a dysfunction of the endothelium and VSMCs and of an impairment of mechanisms that dampen inflammation of the pulmonary artery vessel wall. Since soluble TAM receptors seem to act as decoy receptors [15, 41], an increment of sMer can be considered an indirect evidence of an impairment of Mer receptorial function. In any case, this pathophysiological discussion is merely speculative and merits an ad hoc investigation.

In the population studied, both Gas6 and sAxl plasma values were significantly reduced in patients with severe ILD; additionally, a mild increment is observed in milder forms; in contrast to patients with CTD-PAH, sMer is not changed. There are several evidences of the role of the Gas6/Axl system in the modulation of fibrotic evolution of tissues affected by chronic inflammation; in particular, Gas6 is relevant in the modulation of inflammation and fibrosis of the liver and it marks the evolution to cirrhosis [42]. Gas6-/- mice shows an increased damage of the liver and an impairment in healing after carbon tetrachloride administration; rGas6 administration limits this damage but in turn favours fibrotic repair [4345]. Consistently, Gas6 enhances survival of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and of HSCs activated into myofibroblastic cells (HSCs/MFBs) which are involved in the production of cytokines and matrix protein during liver injury [46]. The relevance of the Gas6/Axl axis in liver fibrosis has also been described in humans. In fact, plasma Gas6 concentrations are increased in hepatic cirrhosis and correlate with disease evolution [47] and with liver elastography measures, helping to identify severe complications as oesophageal varices [48, 49]. Accordingly, the slight increase of plasma Gas6 and sAxl in mild CTD-ILD can be the expression of evolution of chronic inflammation into interstitial fibrosis in the lung, either as a marker of the fibrosis progression or as the indicator of an impairment of the Gas6/Axl system in the control of inflammation; this interpretation is in line with recent reports where Gas6 was observed to increase peribronchial fibrosis in allergic airway disease [50, 51]. Additionally, Gas6 and Axl expressions were observed to increase in lung tissues and fibroblasts obtained from patients affected by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a severe chronic fibrotic disease of the lung which shares several clinical and pathophysiological features with CTD-ILD [52]. Our finding of a reduction of Gas6 and sAxl in patients with severe ILD is only in apparent contrast with this explanation. In fact, on one hand, it may derive from a reduction of the lung tissue due to severe fibrosis or to the fact that in advanced ILD, the fibrotic evolution becomes independent from the initial chronic inflammation trigger. Anyway, also in this case, our pathophysiological discussion is merely speculative and merits further specific investigations.

4.1. Clinical Scenario

Moving to a more clinical point of view, the early detection of CTD-PAH is still a clinical challenge being this complication burdened with a high morbidity and mortality and an early diagnosis related to a better prognosis [1, 5]. The current screening strategy for PAH in these patients includes PFTs with DLCO, TTE and measurement of NT-proBNP, and the referral for RHC if positive results are obtained [53]. The recently proposed DETECT algorithm, which has been validated to stratify patients at risk to be referred to RHC, includes clinical, laboratory, and instrumental variables [6]. The two biomarkers included in the algorithm are NT-proBNP and urate are nonspecific for CTD-PAH [6]; in this contest, the measurement of sMER, which displayed a good diagnostic accuracy for PAH in SS and SSD patients, could be an additional tool to improve PAH detection algorithms.

Similarly, very few biomarkers have been proposed up till now for ILD detection in patients with SS, mainly proteins associated with damage and turnover of alveolar epithelial cells as lung epithelium-derived surfactant protein (SP-D), glycoprotein Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), CCL18, and soluble OX40 [54]. Recently, in a large cohort study of patients with SS, it was observed that SP-D was the most accurate for diagnosis, while KL-6 was related to severity of SSc-ILD; finally, CCL18 was the best prognostic factor for ILD progression [55]. It should be pointed out that both Gas6 and sAxl displayed a good accuracy in ILD identification in our cohort (AUC of 0.787 and 0.705, respectively) similar to that reported for KL-6 (0.689) [55]; if direct comparisons are inappropriate due to differences in study design, we can propose the sAxl/Gas6 assay as an additional tool for identification of ILD in patients affected by SS and SSD.

It is worth to be underlined that the Gas6/TAM system seems to be relevant for both complications of SS and SSD patients highlighting its possible pathogenetic role and utility in the diagnostic process.

4.2. Limitations

Some limitations of our study may interfere with the interpretations of the results: firstly, many patients were already receiving a treatment either for PAH or for CTD-ILD and this fact could have influenced the biomarker values measured in plasma; in second instance, the present study has a cross-sectional design that can limit interpretation of results in particular in terms of confounding factors, and a longitudinal cohort is needed for confirmation; our aim is to build a prospective cohort to evaluate Gas6/sAxl/sMer in comparison with other biomarkers at the development of CTD and PAH and during follow-up to establish a prognostic role. Additionally, a control group of healthy subjects would have been desirable; however, since our aim was not to evaluate the performance of such molecules in diagnosing SS and SSD but if these molecules are candidate biomarkers for cardiopulmonary complications, the importance of a control group may somewhat be lessened. In third instance, the number of cases of CTD and PAH was limited in number but in line to the expected prevalence. Finally, the lack of histopathological evaluations of analytes in pathological tissues further limits pathophysiological interpretations.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the assay of Gas6 and its receptors sAxl and sMer is a useful tool to help to establish if a patient affected by SS or SSD has developed either PAH or ILD; sMer displayed a good diagnostic accuracy for PAH while Gas6 and sAxl for ILD. Our results have also possible pathophysiological implications since the Gas6/TAM receptors system seems to be relevant in both PAH and ILD evolutions of SS and SSD patients and merits further investigations.

Data Availability

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.


This research is original and has a financial support from the Università del Piemonte Orientale.


  1. H. Jawad, S. R. McWilliams, and S. Bhalla, “Cardiopulmonary Manifestations of Collagen Vascular Diseases,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 19, no. 11, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. Galiè, M. Humbert, J. L. Vachiery et al., “2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension,” European Heart Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 67–119, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Avouac, P. Airò, C. Meune et al., “Prevalence of Pulmonary Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis in European Caucasians and Metaanalysis of 5 studies,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2290–2298, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Ruiz-Cano, P. Escribano, R. Alonso et al., “Comparison of Baseline Characteristics and Survival between Patients with Idiopathic and Connective Tissue Disease–related Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension,” The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 621–627, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. Galiè, L. J. Rubin, M. M. Hoeper et al., “Treatment of patients with mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension with bosentan (EARLY study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9630, pp. 2093–2100, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. G. Coghlan, C. P. Denton, E. Grünig et al., “Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1340–1349, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. J. Ryerson and H. R. Collard, “Update on the diagnosis and classification of ILD,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 453–459, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. D. Travis, U. Costabel, D. M. Hansell et al., “An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Update of the International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 733–748, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Steele, M. Hudson, E. Lo, M. Baron, and Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, “Clinical decision rule to predict the presence of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 519–524, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Reiseter, R. Gunnarsson, T. Mogens Aaløkken et al., “Progression and mortality of interstitial lung disease in mixed connective tissue disease: a long-term observational nationwide cohort study,” Rheumatology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. C. Mathai and S. K. Danoff, “Management of interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease,” BMJ, vol. 352, p. h6819, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. D. Steen and T. A. Medsger, “Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972-2002,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 940–944, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. V. Rothlin, E. A. Carrera-Silva, L. Bosurgi, and S. Ghosh, “TAM Receptor Signaling in Immune Homeostasis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 355–391, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Lemke, “Biology of the TAM Receptors,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Sather, K. D. Kenyon, J. B. Lefkowitz et al., “A soluble form of the Mer receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits macrophage clearance of apoptotic cells and platelet aggregation,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 1026–1033, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Bellan, M. Pirisi, and P. P. Sainaghi, “The Gas6/TAM system and multiple sclerosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 1807, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Alciato, P. P. Sainaghi, D. Sola, L. Castello, and G. C. Avanzi, “TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1 expression is inhibited by GAS6 in monocytes/macrophages,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 869–875, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Angelillo-Scherrer, L. Burnier, N. Flores et al., “Role of Gas6 receptors in platelet signaling during thrombus stabilization and implications for antithrombotic therapy,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 237–246, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Melaragno, Y. W. Fridell, and B. C. Berk, “The Gas6/Axl System: A Novel Regulator of Vascular Cell Function,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 250–253, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q. Lu and G. Lemke, “Homeostatic Regulation of the Immune System by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases of the Tyro 3 Family,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5528, pp. 306–311, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. P. Sainaghi, F. Alciato, S. Carnieletto et al., “Gas6 evaluation in patients with acute dyspnea due to suspected pulmonary embolism,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 589–594, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. P. Sainaghi, M. Bellan, F. Lombino et al., “Growth Arrest Specific 6 Concentration is Increased in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. P. Sainaghi, L. Collimedaglia, F. Alciato et al., “Growth Arrest Specific Gene 6 Protein Concentration in Cerebrospinal Fluid Correlates with Relapse Severity in Multiple Sclerosis,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2013, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C.-H. Chen, H.-C. Chen, C.-C. Chang et al., “Growth Arrest-Specific 6 Protein in Patients with Sjögren Syndrome: Determination of the Plasma Level and Expression in the Labial Salivary Gland,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e0139955, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Ekman, A. Jönsen, G. Sturfelt, A. A. Bengtsson, and B. Dahlbäck, “Plasma concentrations of Gas6 and sAxl correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Rheumatology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1064–1069, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Gong, Z. Xu, Y. Liu et al., “Plasma sMer, sAxl and GAS6 levels correlate with disease activity and severity in lupus nephritis,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 49, no. 3, p. e13064, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. van den Hoogen, D. Khanna, J. Fransen et al., “2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 1747–1755, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Kasukawa, T. Tojo, and S. Miyawaki, “Preliminary diagnostic criteria for classification of mixed connective tissue disease,” in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease and Antinuclear Antibodies, G. Sharp, Ed., p. 41, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Bellan, A. Giubertoni, C. Piccinino et al., “Red Cell Distribution Width and Platelet Count as Biomarkers of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients with Connective Tissue Disorders,” Disease Markers, vol. 2019, 7 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. G. Rudski, W. W. Lai, J. Afilalo et al., “Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Heart in Adults: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography: Endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 685–713, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. S. L. Goh, S. R. Desai, S. Veeraraghavan et al., “Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis A Simple Staging System,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 1248–1254, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. A. Kazerooni, F. J. Martinez, A. Flint et al., “Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 977–983, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Alciato, P. P. Sainaghi, L. Castello, L. Bergamasco, S. Carnieletto, and G. C. Avanzi, “Development and Validation of an ELISA Method for Detection of Growth Arrest Specific 6 (GAS6) Protein in Human Plasma,” Journal of Immunoassay & Immunochemistry, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 167–180, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. P. Sainaghi, L. Collimedaglia, F. Alciato et al., “Elevation of Gas6 protein concentration in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP),” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 269, no. 1-2, pp. 138–142, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Zanatta, P. Polito, G. Famoso et al., “Pulmonary arterial hypertension in connective tissue disorders: Pathophysiology and treatment,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 120–131, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. T. N. Stitt, G. Conn, M. Gore et al., “The anticoagulation factor protein S and its relative, Gas6, are ligands for the Tyro 3/Axl family of receptor tyrosine kinases,” Cell, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 661–670, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. V. Rothlin, S. Ghosh, E. I. Zuniga, M. B. Oldstone, and G. Lemke, “TAM receptors are Pleiotropic Inhibitors of the Innate immune Response,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1124–1136, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. N. Sharif, D. Sosic, C. V. Rothlin et al., “Twist mediates suppression of inflammation by type I IFNs and Axl,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 8, pp. 1891–1901, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Cabezón, E. A. Carrera-Silva, G. Flórez-Grau et al., “MERTK as negative regulator of human T cell activation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 751–760, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. N. Khan, E. B. Wong, C. Soni, and Z. S. M. Rahman, “Prolonged Apoptotic Cell Accumulation in Germinal Centers of Mer-Deficient Mice Causes Elevated B Cell and CD4+ Th Cell Responses Leading to Autoantibody Production,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 1433–1446, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. Ekman, J. Stenhoff, and B. Dahlback, “Gas6 is complexed to the soluble tyrosine kinase receptor Axl in human blood,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 838–844, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Bellan, L. M. Castello, and M. Pirisi, “Candidate Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis: A Concise, Pathophysiology-oriented Review,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. F. Lafdil, M.-N. Chobert, V. Deveaux et al., “Growth arrest-specific protein 6 deficiency impairs liver tissue repair after acute toxic hepatitis in mice,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Llacuna, C. Bárcena, L. Bellido-Martín et al., “Growth arrest-specific protein 6 is hepatoprotective against murine ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1371–1379, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Fourcot, D. Couchie, M.-N. Chobert et al., “Gas6 deficiency prevents liver inflammation, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis in mice,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 300, no. 6, pp. G1043–G1053, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. Lafdil, M. N. Chobert, D. Couchie et al., “Induction of Gas6 protein in CCl4-induced rat liver injury and anti-apoptotic effect on hepatic stellate cells,” Hepatology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 228–239, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Bárcena, M. Stefanovic, A. Tutusaus et al., “Gas6/Axl pathway is activated in chronic liver disease and its targeting reduces fibrosis via hepatic stellate cell inactivation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 670–678, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Bellan, G. Pogliani, C. Marconi et al., “Gas6 as a putative noninvasive biomarker of hepatic fibrosis,” Biomarkers in Medicine, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1241–1249, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Bellan, P. P. Sainaghi, M. T. Minh et al., “Gas6 as a predictor of esophageal varices in patients affected by hepatitis C virus related-chronic liver disease,” Biomarkers in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. Shibata, D. M. Habiel, A. L. Coelho, S. L. Kunkel, N. W. Lukacs, and C. M. Hogaboam, “Axl Receptor Blockade Ameliorates Pulmonary Pathology Resulting from Primary Viral Infection and Viral Exacerbation of Asthma,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 8, pp. 3569–3581, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Shibata, U. B. Ismailoglu, N. A. Kittan et al., “Role of Growth Arrest–Specific Gene 6 in the Development of Fungal Allergic Airway Disease in Mice,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 615–625, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. S. Espindola, D. M. Habiel, R. Narayanan et al., “Targeting of TAM Receptors Ameliorates Fibrotic Mechanisms in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 197, no. 11, pp. 1443–1456, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. D. Khanna, H. Gladue, R. Channick et al., “Recommendations for Screening and Detection of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 3194–3201, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. Khanna, J. Seibold, J. Goldin, D. P. Tashkin, D. E. Furst, and A. Wells, “Interstitial lung disease points to consider for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis,” Rheumatology, vol. 56, suppl_5, pp. v27–v32, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Elhai, A. M. Hoffmann-Vold, J. Avouac et al., “Performance of Candidate Serum Biomarkers for Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease,” Arthritis & Rhematology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 972–982, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mattia Bellan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.