Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 4652483 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4652483

Tinghua Hu, LiBang Qiao, Hong Li, Hui Ren, Qian Ning, Hong Zhou, Xue Chen, Zhongmin Sun, Liangrong Shen, "Pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) Levels in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid as a Lung Cancer Biomarker", Disease Markers, vol. 2020, Article ID 4652483, 6 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4652483

Pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) Levels in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid as a Lung Cancer Biomarker

Academic Editor: Silvia Angeletti
Received17 Jan 2020
Accepted02 May 2020
Published10 Jun 2020

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the utility of pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) as lung cancer (LCa) diagnostic. A total of 89 LCa patients and 84 non-LCa patients who received bronchoscopy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from December 2014 to February 2015 were enrolled. LCa was subdivided according to pathological type (scale, gland, and small cell lung cancer). BALF samples were obtained during bronchoscopy and PTX-3 levels assayed by ELISA. -tests, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed for the comparison of PTX-3 levels between the different groups. Correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to analyze clinical data. The levels of PTX-3 increased in the LCa groups. PTX-3 levels were higher in the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) compared to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) groups. In LCa patients, obstructive pneumonia could upregulate the expression of PTX-3 in BALF. The area under the ROC curve of PTX-3 in BALF during LCa diagnosis, SCLC, and LCa with obstructive pneumonia was 0.949 (), 0.672 (), and 0.838 (), respectively. In conclusion, PTX-3 in BALF has a potential value as an LCa biomarker, particularly in cases of SCLC and LCa with obstructive pneumonia.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer (LCa) is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally [1]. Due to poor LCa detection methods, only ~10-20% of patients with LCa can be treated at the time of diagnosis [2] leading to 5-year survival rates of ~14% [3]. Current LCa markers include carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cancer antigen 125, and cytokeratin 19 fragment, but all lack the sensitivity and specificity to act as early LCa diagnostics [4].

Pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) is a long pentraxin [5, 6] produced locally at sites of inflammation by an array of immune cells in response to inflammatory signals including IL-1, TNFα, toll-like receptor, and LPS [7, 8]. The induction of PTX-3 is fast and short-lived, peaking 4–6 hours poststimulation [9], but can be trapped by neutrophils to enhance its capability to eliminate pathogens and prevent necrosis and apoptosis [10]. PTX-3 also participates in an array of biological effects, including immune defenses, inflammation, and apoptosis [11]. In recent years, it has been reported that PTX-3 played an important role in respiratory diseases, such as cigarette-induced pulmonary emphysema [12], lung infections [13, 14], severe acute respiratory syndrome [15], and pulmonary arterial hypertension [16].

Previous studies on the expression of PTX-3 have focused on serum and lung tissue [17, 18]. However, studies on the expression of PTX-3 in alveolar lavage are sparse. In this study, through the detection of PTX-3 expression in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients suffering from LCa, we explored its role in the early diagnosis of LCa.

2. Methods

2.1. Patient Cohort

Patients receiving bronchoscopy at our institute from December 2014 to February 2015 were selected. All of the preoperative preparations were improved, including informed consent for bronchoscopy and anesthesia.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged ≥18 years; (2) undergoing bronchoscopy; and (3) pathological diagnosis of LCa.

Exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) long-term oral intake of corticosteroids; (2) adrenal; (3) unqualified bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; and (4) patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria.

2.2. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) Collection

Through electrocardiograph monitoring, blood oxygen saturation, and anesthesia, electronic bronchoscopes (BF260, FF260, BF240, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used to collect the BALFs, with all stages performed according to the conventional bronchoscopy process [19]. The bronchoscope entered the lung segments or subsegments near the lesions (chest CT suggestive of exudation, new infections, and so on). Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed on the collected BALF with recovery rates of 40%-60%. BALF samples were centrifuged (10 min at 3000 rpm); the supernatants were collected and all samples were stored at -80°C.

2.3. PTX-3 Detection

PTX-3 levels in BALF were detected by ELISA as per the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Company, USA).

2.4. General Information and Laboratory Parameters

General clinical data and laboratory parameters were obtained from clinical records, laboratory assessments, biochemical rooms, and imaging analysis. Times between chest CT scans and bronchoscope examinations did not exceed 1 week. Blood biochemical specimens and bronchoscope examinations lasted no more than 3 days.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data conformed to a normal distribution and are shown as the . Quantitative data belonging to abnormal distributions was presented as the median and quartile range. Groups were compared via -tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis. Spearman’s tests were used for correlation analysis. The diagnostic values of PTX-3 in BALF were analyzed by ROC curves. values < 0.05 were deemed significant differences.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Data

A total of 173 BALF samples were collected by bronchoscopy. A total of 89 patients had LCa, amongst which 67 were male and 22 were female, with an average age of years. A total of 84 patients were LCa negative, amongst which 50 were male and 33 were female, with an average age of years. Table 1 shows all patient characteristics.


ItemPatients with lung cancerPatients without lung cancer value

Number ()8984
Sexuality (male/female)67/2250/33
Age (year)
(°C)36.75 (36.50-37.40)36.87 (36.50-37.05)
Pause (per/min)82 (76-87.5)80 (78-88)
Respiration (per/min)20 (19-21)20 (20-20)
SBP (mmHg)120 (110-132)120 (110-130)
DBP (mmHg)78 (70-80)73 (70-80)
WBC count (×109/L)6.75 (5.79-8.17)7.15 (4.76-8.76)
Neutrophil count (×109/L)4.74 (3.73-6.03)5.04 (3.46-6.78)
Neutrophil percentage (%)72.36 (64.7-78.6)73.11 (67.54-80.20)
Monocyte count (×109/L)0.42 (0.30-0.55)0.35 (0.24-0.52)
Monocyte percentage (%)5.75 (4.47-7.20)5.10 (4.20-6.60)
Pulmonary complications
 COPD ()98
 Bronchiectasis ()22
 Interstitial disease ()30
 Pleural effusion ()2212

3.2. PTX-3 Expression in BALF in LCa vs. Non-LCa Patients

LCa groups showed higher levels of PTX-3 in BALF (Figure 1 and Table 2). Of the patients, 30 had scale cancer, 24 had gland cancer, 21 had SCLC, and 14 had no pathological diagnosis (Table 3). As shown in Figure 2, PTX-3 expression significantly differed across the groups (), particularly in cases of gland lung cancer vs. SLCC (). No significant differences were observed between scale cancer and gland LCa or scale LCa and SCLC ().


Patients with lung cancerPatients without lung cancer value

PTX-3 level (pg/mL)1947.9774 (1904.0944-1979.7761)1825.0369 (1776.8666-1859.9526)≤0.000

.

ItemsScale cancerGland cancerSmall cell lung cancerUndiagnosed value

Number ()30242114
Sexuality (male/female)(29/1)(14/10)(16/5)(8/6)
Age (year)63 (59-71)58 (53-62.5)62 (53-68)62 (53-67)
(°C)36.7 (36.5-37.4)36.7 (36.45-38)36.8 (36.5-37.1)36.8 (36.6-37)
Pause (per/min)82 (76-86)84 (76-90)81 (74-84)81 (78-84)
Respiration (per/min)20 (19-20)20 (19.5-21.5)20 (18-20)20 (19-21)
SBP (mmHg)125 (110-132)126 (118-137)114 (110-130)111 (110-130)
DBP (mmHg)78 (70-80)78 (72-80)80 (70-80)70 (70-80)
WBC count (×109/L)6.31 (6.02-7.52)7.08 (6.41-8.34)6.16 (5.36-7.6)7.17 (5.18-10.77)
Neutrophil count (×109/L)4.64 (3.92-5.76)4.96 (4.06-6.40)4.61 (3.42-5.93)5.20 (3.7-8.88)
Neutrophil percentage (%)76.94 (66.5-81.84)74.2 (61.2-79.1)70.97 (65.05-74.2)70.2 (65.5-75.51)
Monocyte count (×109/L)0.41 (0.31-0.58)0.42 (0.29-0.56)0.45 (0.34-0.49)0.32 (0.26-0.52)
Monocyte percentage (%)6.00 (4.7-7.2)0.42 (0.29-0.55)0.45 (0.34-0.49)0.32 (0.26-0.52)

3.3. PTX-3 Expression in BALF with or without Obstructive Pneumonia

Obstructive pneumonia is the main X-ray feature of LCa that was judged according to the following criteria [20]: patchy infiltration in chest CT and at least 2 of the following 4 items: temperature is more than 38°C; or ; purulent secretions in the respiratory tract; and positive bacterial cultures of respiratory secretions. The LCa group was subdivided into two groups: namely, those with and without obstructive pneumonia. Group comparisons showed significant differences () in PTX-3 in BALF groups (Table 4, Figure 3).


GroupMedian (interquartile range) value

Patients associated with obstructive pneumonia1977.8666 (31.1316)≤0.000
Patients without obstructive pneumonia1912.0813 (55.4708)

, .
3.4. Correlation between PTX-3 in BALF and Specific Clinical Indicators

Spearman correlation analysis was performed to compare PTX-3 levels in BALF and serum CEA, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 and the smoking index, respectively. The results showed that CEA, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 positively correlated with PTX-3 levels in BALF with no statistical significance, whilst for the smoking index, a negative correlation was observed (Table 5).


ItemsThe Spearman correlation coefficient
value value

WBC count (×109/L)0.0940.385
Neutrophil count (×109/L)0.1700.113
Monocyte count (×109/L)0.0030.976
CRP (mg/L)0.1980.073
ESR (mm/L)0.2300.035
CEA (ng/mL)0.0030.975
NSE (ng/mL)0.0160.884
CYFRA 21-1 (ng/mL)0.1700.120
The smoking index-0.2890.006

, .
3.5. Diagnostic Values of PTX-3 in BALF and Serum CEA, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 for LCa

We applied ROC curve analysis to assess the diagnostic value of PTX-3 in BALF. Serum CEA, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 for LCa are shown in Figure 4 and Table 6. The PTX-3 in BALF showed a diagnostic advantage in lung cancer diagnosed with a larger area under the curve (0.949). When taking the cutoff point of 1889.8286 pg/mL for PTX-3 level, the sensitivity for LCa diagnosis was 88.8%, and the specificity was 96.4%.


The biomarkersArea under the curve (AUC)95% confidence interval value
Lower limitUpper limit

The PTX-3 level in BALF0.9490.9090.989<0.001
CEA in serum0.7670.6960.839<0.001
NSE in serum0.6890.6090.768<0.001
CYFRA 21-1 in serum0.7900.7190.861<0.001

3.6. Diagnostic Value of PTX-3 in BALF for SCLC

The AUC of the ROC curves (Figure 5) indicated that the diagnostic value of PTX-3 for BALF in SCLC was 0.672 (95% CI; 0.543, 0.801, ). When taking the cutoff point of 1933.0837 pg/mL for PTX-3 level, the sensitivity for the diagnosis of SCLC was 81.00%, and the specificity was 61.10%. This suggested that the PTX-3 levels in BALF can distinguish SCLC and NSCLC.

3.7. Diagnostic Value of PTX-3 in BALF for LCa Patients with Obstructive Pneumonia

Figure 6 shows that the AUC of ROC for PTX-3 in BALF for LCa with obstructive pneumonia was 0.838 (95% CI; 0.747, 0.928; ). At the cutoff point of 1952.3828 pg/mL for PTX-3 levels, the sensitivity for the diagnosis of lung cancer with obstructive pneumonia was 88.00% and the specificity was 80.00%. Thus, PTX-3 levels in BALF had a diagnostic value for LCa with obstructive pneumonia.

4. Discussion

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), also termed liquid biopsy, has great importance and significance in early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, judgment of curative effects, and the prognostic evaluation of respiratory disease.

Known as one type of soluble pattern recognition receptor, PTX-3 plays a key role in immune defenses. It can be produced from various cell types including immunocytes and histiocytes and participants in (TLR) responses, inflammation, and physical and chemical injuries [21]. Compared to common pentraxins such as CRP, PTX-3 differs in terms of source, distribution, identifiable ligands, and induction signals. In addition, PTX-3 is long lasting, has a stable genetic structure, and is not easily influenced by gender, body weight, and liver or kidney function. PTX-3 thus shows significant advantages over CRP for local inflammatory reactions [22].

PTX-3 is an inflammatory indicator often considered as a modulator of tumor-associated inflammation [23], with important roles in an array of cancers [2426]. The cutoff value of PTX-3 in the serum is 8.03 ng/mL and can be used as a diagnostic for LCa, with a sensitivity of 72.8% and a specificity of 77.3% [4]. We investigated the levels of PTX-3 levels in lung tissues and serum from the lower respiratory tract and found that PTX-3 levels in the BALF of patients with LCa were significantly higher than those of patients without LCa.

PTX-3 is a biomarker for various inflammatory conditions including febrile neutropenia [27]. We found that the PTX-3 levels in the BALF of patients suffering from LCa with obstructive pneumonia were much higher. Upon comparison of scale lung cancer, gland lung cancer, and SCLC, PTX-3 levels in the BALF of patients suffering from small cell lung cancer were drastically increased (cutoff value: 1933.0837 pg/mL; sensitivity for diagnosis: 81.00%; specificity: 61.10%). This prompted us to conclude that PTX-3 levels in BALF have diagnostic values for these LCa subtypes, which was consistent with other studies [28].

A range of tumor markers has been adopted for LCa in the clinic including CA19.9 CA125, TAG-72.3, CA15.3, CEA, SCC, SNSE, and CYFRA 21-1. However, due to their lack of sensitivity and specificity, particularly in patients with renal failure and hepatic diseases, false positives and negative are frequently encountered, limiting their applicability for mass screening or auxiliary diagnosis. PTX-3 levels in BALF are largely unaffected by gender, age, basic vital signs, peripheral blood leukocyte count, or neutrophil counts. Compared to classical serum LCa biomarkers, PTX-3 in BALF was superior with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

In conclusion, the expression of PTX-3 in BALF is a clinical indicator for the diagnosis of LCa prior to obtaining pathological data.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication.

Authors’ Contributions

Tinghua Hu and LiBang Qiao contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81170073).

References

  1. A. Jemal, F. Bray, M. M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward, and D. Forman, “Global cancer statistics,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 69–90, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. A. Groome, V. Bolejack, J. J. Crowley et al., “The IASLC lung cancer staging project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 694–705, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Ferlay, H. R. Shin, F. Bray, D. Forman, C. Mathers, and D. M. Parkin, “Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 2893–2917, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Zhang, W. H. Ren, Y. Gao, N. Y. Wang, and W. J. Wu, “Clinical significance and prognostic value of pentraxin-3 as serologic biomarker for lung cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 4215–4221, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. V. Alles, B. Bottazzi, G. Peri, J. Golay, M. Introna, and A. Mantovani, “Inducible expression of ptx3, a new member of the pentraxin family, in human mononuclear phagocytes,” Blood, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 3483–3493, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. D. Norata, C. Garlanda, and A. L. Catapano, “The long pentraxin ptx3: a modulator of the immunoinflammatory response in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 35–40, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Deban, S. Jaillon, C. Garlanda, B. Bottazzi, and A. Mantovani, “Pentraxins in innate immunity: lessons from ptx3,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 343, no. 1, pp. 237–249, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Presta, M. Camozzi, G. Salvatori, and M. Rusnati, “Role of the soluble pattern recognition receptor ptx3 in vascular biology,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 723–738, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Inforzato, B. Bottazzi, C. Garlanda, S. Valentino, and A. Mantovani, “Pentraxins in humoral innate immunity,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 946, pp. 1–20, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Daigo and T. Hamakubo, “Host-protective effect of circulating pentraxin 3 (ptx3) and complex formation with neutrophil extracellular traps,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 3, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Garlanda, B. Bottazzi, A. Bastone, and A. Mantovani, “Pentraxins at the crossroads between innate immunity, inflammation, matrix deposition, and female fertility,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 337–366, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. S. Pauwels, K. R. Bracke, T. Maes et al., “Cigarette smoke induces PTX3 expression in pulmonary veins of mice in an IL-1 dependent manner,” Respiratory Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Moalli, M. Paroni, T. Véliz Rodriguez et al., “The therapeutic potential of the humoral pattern recognition molecule PTX3 in chronic lung infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 9, pp. 5425–5434, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Marra, V. L. Sousa, R. Gaziano et al., “Efficacy of PTX3 and posaconazole combination in a rat model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 6284–6286, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Han, X. Ma, J. Zhang et al., “Protective effects of long pentraxin PTX3 on lung injury in a severe acute respiratory syndrome model in mice,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 1285–1296, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Tamura, T. Ono, M. Kuwana et al., “Human pentraxin 3 (PTX3) as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. J. Kao, H. W. Yang, S. M. Tsao et al., “Plasma long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) concentration is a novel marker of disease activity in patients with community-acquired pneumonia,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 907–913, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Hamon, S. Jaillon, C. Person et al., “Proteolytic cleavage of the long pentraxin PTX3 in the airways of cystic fibrosis patients,” Innate Immunity, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 611–622, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Srinivasan, L. L. Wolfenden, X. Song, T. M. Perl, and E. F. Haponik, “Bronchoscope reprocessing and infection prevention and control: bronchoscopy-specific guidelines are needed,” Chest, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 307–314, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. H. Choi, S. B. Hong, G. B. Ko et al., “Viral infection in patients with severe pneumonia requiring intensive care unit admission,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 325–332, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. W. Du Clos, “Pentraxins: structure, function, and role in inflammation,” ISRN inflammation, vol. 2013, Article ID 379040, 22 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. J. Ma, A. Doni, L. Romani et al., “Ficolin-1–PTX3 complex formation promotes clearance of altered self-cells and modulates IL-8 production,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 1324–1333, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Locatelli, S. Ferrero, F. Martinelli Boneschi et al., “The long pentraxin ptx3 as a correlate of cancer-related inflammation and prognosis of malignancy in gliomas,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 260, no. 1-2, pp. 99–106, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Choi, E. J. Lee, D. H. Song et al., “Elevated pentraxin 3 in bone metastatic breast cancer is correlated with osteolytic function,” Oncotarget, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 481–492, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Infante, P. Allavena, C. Garlanda et al., “Prognostic and diagnostic potential of local and circulating levels of pentraxin 3 in lung cancer patients,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 983–991, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Stallone, L. Cormio, G. S. Netti et al., “Pentraxin 3: a novel biomarker for predicting progression from prostatic inflammation to prostate cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, no. 16, pp. 4230–4238, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. Takeda, K. Asai, N. Ijiri et al., “Pentraxin-3 as a biomarker for febrile neutropenia in patients with lung cancer,” Osaka City Medical Journal, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  28. C. Liu, Y. Yao, and W. Wang, “Pentraxin-3 as a prognostic marker in patients with small-cell lung cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 10, p. 207, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Tinghua Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views124
Downloads129
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.