Review Article
Predictive and Prognostic Role of PD-L1 in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Characteristics of the included studies on PD-L1 status predicting the prognosis in UC patients after cystectomy.
| Study | Boorjian et al. (2008) [4] | Wang et al. (2009) [18] | Xylinas et al. (2014) [19] |
| Country | USA | China | USA | Study interval | 1990-1994 | 2000-2002 | 1988-2003 | Age (years) | 69 (37-90) | 62 (42-78) | 66 (61-72) | Male/female | 259/59 | 40/10 | 244/58 | Management | RC | RC | RC | PD-L1 expression | Tumour cells | Tumour cells | Tumour cells | Detection method | IHC | IHC | IHC | Cut-off value | 5% | 10% | 5% | Follow-up (mons.) | 164 (1-210) | 28 (6-52) | 120 (78-125) | Clinical outcomes | Receipt of BCG, tumour stage, TIL | Tumour grade, tumour stage, recurrent UC | None | All UC patients | | | | PD-L1+ | 12.4% | 72.0% | 25.2% | PD-L1+/- | 39/275 | 36/14 | 76/226 | OS, HR(95% CI) | 1.06(0.71-1.58) | 2.24(1.16-4.38) | 0.98(0.73-1.31) | value | 0.88 | 0.01 | 0.79 | CSS, HR(95% CI) | 0.82(0.42-1.63) | na | 0.79(0.53-1.61) | value | 0.23 | na | 0.58 | DFS, HR(95% CI) | 0.83(0.43-1.58) | na | 0.74(0.50-1.11) | value | 0.15 | na | 0.56 | Organ-confined disease | na | | PD-L1+ | 16.2% | na | 25.0% | PD-L1+/- | 27/140 | na | 24/72 | OS, HR(95% CI) | 2.18(1.26-3.77) | na | 1.93(1.09-3.43) | value | 0.02 | na | 0.005 | CSS, HR(95% CI) | 1.59(0.56-4.49) | na | 1.21(0.47-3.13) | value | 0.68 | na | 0.38 | DFS, HR(95% CI) | 1.24(0.44-3.45) | na | 1.27(0.50-3.26) | value | 0.62 | na | 0.69 |
|
|
UC: urothelial carcinoma; PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1; +/-: positive/negative; RC: radical cystectomy; TIL: tumour-inflating lymphocyte; IHC: immunohistochemistry; BCG: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; DFS: disease-free survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; na: data not available. No association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathologic features. |