Research Article

Association of Polymorphisms in Vitamin D-Metabolizing Enzymes DHCR7 and CYP2R1 with Cancer Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 4

The results of Begg’s and Egger’s test for the publication bias.

Comparison typeBegg’s testEgger’s test
value value value value

CYP2R1 rs10741657 (G/A)
Heterozygote vs. homozygote wild01-0.70.521
Homozygote variant vs. homozygote wild0.380.707-0.730.503
Dominant model01-0.530.627
Recessive model01-0.290.787
Allelic model0.750.452-0.380.722
CYP2R1 rs12794714 (G/A)
Heterozygote vs. homozygote wild0.340.7340.210.851
Homozygote variant vs. homozygote wild1.020.308-2.840.105
Dominant model0.340.734-0.010.994
Recessive model1.70.089-9.450.011
Allelic model0.340.734-1.120.38
CYP2R1 rs2060793 (G/A)
Heterozygote vs. homozygote wild01NANA
Homozygote variant vs. homozygote wild01NANA
Dominant model01NANA
Recessive model01NANA
Allelic model01NANA
DHCR7 rs12785878 (T/G)
Heterozygote vs. homozygote wild0.240.806-1.640.2
Homozygote variant vs. homozygote wild-0.241-1.760.177
Dominant model-0.241-1.740.18
Recessive model0.240.806-1.150.332
Allelic model0.240.806-1.560.217
DHCR7 rs1790349 (A/G)
Heterozygote vs. homozygote wild010.180.884
Homozygote variant vs. homozygote wild010.130.92
Dominant model01-0.440.737
Recessive model01-2.340.257
Allelic model1.040.296-0.90.532

Note: the results are in bold if .