Serum Levels of BDNF in Patients with Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer

Wang, Zhe; Wang, Shuang; Liu, Yu; Gao, Shan; Yu, Yunqing; Hu, Zhaolan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8867368

Disease Markers

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8867368 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8867368

Serum Levels of BDNF in Patients with Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer

Zhe Wang,¹Shuang Wang,²Yu Liu,³Shan Gao,¹Yunqing Yu,¹and Zhaolan Hu¹

Academic Editor: Yuzhen Xu

Received30 Mar 2020

Revised18 Jan 2021

Accepted28 Jan 2021

Published12 Feb 2021

Abstract

The present study is aimed at examining the serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and investigating its role in differential diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods. In a Chinese population, we conducted a case-control study to compare the diagnostic performance of serum levels of BDNF and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for CRC. We enrolled 61 healthy controls, 31 patients with adenomas, and 81 patients with CRC. We explored the correlation between serum levels of BDNF and several pathological features, such as tumor differentiation and TNM staging. Results. The serum levels of BDNF were significantly () higher in patients with CRC (, ) than in the healthy controls (, ). Serum BDNF also correlated with tumor size, tumor differentiation, and TNM staging (). For early diagnosis, the combination of BDNF (AUC 0.719; 95% CI, 0.621–0.816) and CEA (AUC 0.733; 95% CI, 0.632–0.909) slightly improved the diagnostic performance for CRC (AUC 0.823; 95% CI, 0.737-0.909). Conclusions. Combined detection of serum BDNF and CEA may thus have the potential to become a new laboratory method for the early clinical diagnosis of CRC.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most common malignancies in western countries, is a frequent cause of death, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide [1]. The progression of the disease is slow, and the prospect for a reduction in mortality by early detection is much better than for most other forms of cancer [2]. Clinical screening of CRC relies mainly on a guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), which is limited, and the need for stool sampling may restrict acceptance and compliance [3, 4]. Moreover, intensive efforts have been made to identify blood-based biomarkers that may provide a promising alternative for noninvasive CRC screening [5]. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is currently the most commonly used serum tumor marker for CRC [6]. However, it is not recommended as a screening or diagnostic tool for this neoplasm, especially in the early stages, because of low sensitivity [7]. Thus, it is important to search for new serum markers for colorectal cancer.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the neurotrophin family, is known to play a critical role in the modulation of cell survival, differentiation, and apoptosis in the nervous system [8], and it is also widely expressed in nonneuronal tissues [9]. Besides its distribution in healthy tissue, BDNF has also been found in tumors, such as neuroblastoma [10], breast cancer [11], lung cancer [12], hepatocellular cancer [13], and others. Interestingly, the binding of BDNF to its receptor, tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB), promotes the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells and induces tumor immunosuppression [14, 15]. A study assessing the mRNA and protein levels of BDNF and TrkB reported significantly higher levels in neoplastic tissue compared to adjacent nonneoplastic tissue from the same individual [16], suggesting that BDNF may play an intricate role in CRC. Previous studies have reported that the BDNF/TrkB pathway enhances several key biological processes in CRC cell lines, including proliferation, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, as well as resistance to apoptosis [16–18].

Despite its emerging role in tumorigenesis, few reports mention BDNF as a potential diagnostic marker in CRC. Here we describe a retrospective study utilizing an ELISA-based immunoassay to measure the protein concentration of serum BDNF in adenomas and patients with CRC and to investigate its potential usefulness as a blood-based biomarker for the diagnosis of CRC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Healthy Controls

The subjects were chosen from among patients with CRC and adenoma admitted into the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, from November 2018 to November 2019. All disease diagnoses were verified by pathological and cytological methods. None of the subjects were receiving radiation chemotherapy and other immunotherapy. Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging was based on the Criteria of Colorectal Cancer Staging from the 8th edition of the Cancer Staging Manual from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [19]. The healthy controls (HC) were selected randomly from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

2.2. Processing of Serum Samples

Fasting blood work was collected from each patient on the morning of the second day after hospitalization. The serum was obtained by centrifugation at for 10 min at 4°C. 500 μL of samples were stored per tube at -80°C. Similarly, serum samples were collected from healthy control subjects on the morning of a routine examination.

2.3. Clinical Parameters and Laboratory Results

The clinical parameters of eligible patients, including age, sex, tumor location, TNM classification, tumor grade, and treatment type were retrieved from the patient’s medical records. CEA measured by electrochemiluminescence using an Elecsys 2010 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were also collected from the medical records. The serum level of mature BDNF was measured by an ELISA-based method, as described previously [20], using the human BDNF ELISA Kit (cat no. ab99978, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The optical density of each well was measured using an automated microplate reader (Epoch BioTek Instruments, Winooski, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (SPSS version 22.0, IBM, USA). A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were presented as and were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Variables displaying nonnormal distribution were logarithmically transformed (natural logarithm) before use in parametric analyses. The correlations between the serum levels of BDNF and CEA and clinicopathological tumor parameters, such as infiltration, metastasis, and differentiation, were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. Specificity and sensitivity of serum BDNF and CEA expression levels for CRC patients with control of follow-up were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers was also determined by obtaining the largest possible area under the curve (AUC) in ROC analysis. Bonferroni data were analyzed using SPSS v.23.0 software. For all comparisons, was considered statistically significant. Graphs were plotted using GraphPad Prism v.6.0 software (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants

A total of 173 serum samples were collected, including 81 patients with CRC, 31 patients with adenomas, and 61 HC. The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The mean age in the patient cohort was 54 years (IQR 47-63 years). The gender distribution was 60.4% males and 39.5% females. Since the measurement of serum BDNF is influenced by the total serum protein concentration and the number of platelets [21], we measured these serum parameters in the patients and the HC and found no differences between the two groups. We also observed no significant difference in gender and age between the patient cohort and the HC.

The histological type of CRC and adenomas were defined according to the pathological diagnosis. TNM staging was based on the eighth edition of the TNM staging system (8-TNM) [19]. Patients did not receive chemotherapy or radiation before admission. The category and staging of TNM in patients with CRC are shown in Table 2.

3.2. Serum Level of BDNF in Patients with CRC

Analysis of the serum levels of BDNF revealed that the serum level of BDNF in patients with CRC () was significantly higher than the level in HC (; ) and patients with adenomas (; ) (Figure 1(a)). Moreover, the mean serum level of CEA in patients with CRC was significantly higher () than the level in HC (; ) and patients with adenomas (; ) (Figure 1(b)). Moreover, we identified a slightly significant association between the serum level of BDNF and other biomarkers, such as CEA (; ) in patients with CRC (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

3.3. Correlation between Serum Level of BDNF or CEA and the Clinicopathological Parameters of CRC

The correlations between serum levels of BDNF or CEA and clinicopathologic features are summarized in Table 3. There was no significant correlation between BDNF () or CEA () expression and tumor location. However, high serum levels of BDNF () were significantly correlated with tumor differentiation (Table 3). Serum levels of BDNF () were also significantly correlated with tumor masses (Table 3), while CEA () levels were not (Table 3). Serum levels of BDNF were significantly higher in patients with CRC with metastasis () compared to patients without metastasis () (, Table 3), suggesting that BDNF was related to tumor progression and metastasis in CRC.

3.4. Assessment of Tumor and Adenoma by ROC Analysis

To evaluate the potential of using serum levels of BDNF as CRC biomarkers, we analyzed the ROC curve and area under the curve (AUC). The cutoff values for BDNF and CEA in patients with recrudescent CRC were 7.36 ng/mL and 4.59 ng/mL, respectively (Figure 3). The sensitivity and specificity of these cutoff values were 92.6% and 4.19% for CEA (AUC 0.733; 95% CI, 0.632–0.909), respectively, and 60.5% and 80.6% for BDNF (AUC 0.719; 95% CI, 0.621–0.816), respectively. Combining CEA and BDNF, the sensitivity and specificity reached 85.2% and 67.7% (AUC 0.823; 95% CI, 0.737-0.909), respectively (Table 4). These results suggest that designating BDNF as an additional biomarker might be useful for the early detection of CRC. In particular, combining BDNF with CEA may enhance the sensitivity and specificity of CRC diagnoses.

4. Discussion

The early screening and diagnosis of CRC can help guide clinical measures for targeted treatment, as colorectal cancer progresses slowly and has a long incubation period. Over 90% of colorectal cancers originate from adenomas (a precancerous lesion), and it takes 5-7 years to transition from adenoma to cancer [22]. Thus, early detection that distinguishes the occurrence of colorectal adenoma is an important guarantee for the survival of patients. At present, research has not found that it is 100% sensitive and specific as tumor biomarkers. So, the combination of multiple biomarkers to diagnose tumors is a clinical trend in the future.

BDNF is the most abundant neurotrophin in brain tissue, and the serum level of BDNF has been suggested to function as a biomarker in some psychiatric and neurological diseases [23–25]. BDNF has also been found in a wide range of healthy nonneuronal tissues in adult humans [9]. For example, Shibayama and Koizumi [9] reported the existence of BDNF in the small intestine and colon.

However, high levels of BDNF are thought to be associated with more aggressive malignant behavior and a poor prognosis in human cancer [26]. Additionally, local progression, nodal and distant metastases, clinical stage, and poor prognosis are associated with increased TrkB levels, the high-affinity receptor of BDNF [27]. It has been shown that suppression of the BDNF/TrkB pathway could overcome resistance to therapy [28]. Moreover, reports indicate that BDNF is abnormally expressed in human CRC cells [18, 29]. Although serum levels of BDNF have been considered to have diagnostic value in several human cancers, there is a deficiency in its application for the diagnosis of CRC.

We found that the levels of BDNF in the serum of CRC patients were higher than those of HC, which was different from Brierley et al.’s research [30]. An explanation for this is that tumor staging and metastasis may affect the serum BDNF level. It has been shown that the level of BDNF is positively correlated with tumor metastasis and poor prognosis [27], and binding of BDNF to its receptor TrkB can promote the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of tumors [14, 15, 27]. In addition, sample size, race, and individual differences may lead to different results.

Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of BDNF for the diagnosis of CRC and explored the relationship between BDNF and different clinicopathologic features. Our analysis revealed that the serum levels of BDNF were significantly higher in patients with CRC compared with those of HC, which were consistent with the upregulation of its expression in CRC tumor tissues. Our analysis also showed that the serum levels of BDNF performed better than CEA in distinguishing patients with CRC from patients with nonmalignant disease. We further analyzed the correlations between serum BDNF and clinicopathologic features of CRC and found that BDNF overexpression was closely associated with tumor differentiation, tumor size, and metastasis, but not with gender or age.

ROC analysis revealed that when CRC is compared with adenomas, the serum levels of BDNF provided a diagnostic efficacy with an AUC of 0.719, indicating that serum BDNF may likely have a potential role in the early diagnosis of CRC. The combination of the levels of BDNF and CEA could compensate for the deficiency of a single biomarker, and could increase the specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of CRC. Additionally, with different clinicopathologic features, such as differentiation and T stage, the diagnostic performance of BDNF was still better than CEA.

There are some limitations to this study. First, we are aware that the sample size in this cohort is rather small, which limits the power of multivariate analyses. Additionally, we failed to exclude patients with cirrhosis, which may interfere with the experimental results [31]. Therefore, further validation by larger-scale prospective trials is needed. Second, this study is a retrospective study and a prospective study is needed to examine the changes in serum levels of BDNF in high-risk populations, such as those with a family history of CRC, and the changes in stool properties to assess the applicability of BDNF in CRC monitoring.

5. Conclusion

Elevated serum levels of BDNF may play a critical role in the development and progression of CRC. Serum BDNF may serve as a convenient diagnostic biomarker with high efficiency, both alone and in combination with the level of CEA, to improve early diagnosis of CRC.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhe Wang performed the statistical analysis and prepared the manuscript. Zhaolan Hu was responsible for the study design and coordination and guided the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. Shuang Wang and Yu Liu were responsible for the study design and coordination and reviewed the manuscript critically. Yunqing Yu and Shan Gao collected the data and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Central South University postgraduate independent exploration and innovation project (No. 2019zzts202 to ZW), the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (No. 81901231 to ZLH), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M672516 to ZLH), and the Hunan Province Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (No. 2018JJ3864 to SW; No. 2020JJ5809 to ZLH). The authors thank AiMi Academic Services (http://www.aimieditor.com) for English language editing and review services.

References

M. Arnold, M. S. Sierra, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal, and F. Bray, “Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality,” Gut, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 683–691, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tao, S. Hundt, U. Haug, and H. Brenner, “Sensitivity estimates of blood-based tests for colorectal cancer detection: impact of overrepresentation of advanced stage disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 242–253, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Fenton, J. G. Elmore, D. S. M. Buist, R. J. Reid, D. J. Tancredi, and L. M. Baldwin, “Longitudinal adherence with fecal occult blood test screening in community practice,” The Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 397–401, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. F. Gellad, K. M. Stechuchak, D. A. Fisher et al., “Longitudinal adherence to fecal occult blood testing impacts colorectal cancer screening quality,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1125–1134, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hundt, U. Haug, and H. Brenner, “Blood markers for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1935–1953, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Sahlmann, K. Homayounfar, M. Niessner et al., “Repeated adjuvant anti-CEA radioimmunotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases: safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy results of a prospective phase 2 study,” Cancer, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 638–649, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Y. Locker, S. Hamilton, J. Harris et al., “ASCO 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 33, pp. 5313–5327, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Arévalo and S. Wu, “Neurotrophin signaling: many exciting surprises!,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS, vol. 63, no. 13, pp. 1523–1537, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Shibayama and H. Koizumi, “Cellular localization of the Trk neurotrophin receptor family in human non-neuronal tissues,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 148, no. 6, article 1807, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Jaboin, C. J. Kim, D. R. Kaplan, and C. J. Thiele, “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor activation of TrkB protects neuroblastoma cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis via phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase pathway,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 6756–6763, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Descamps, R. A. Toillon, E. Adriaenssens et al., “Nerve Growth Factor Stimulates Proliferation and Survival of Human Breast Cancer Cells through Two Distinct Signaling Pathways,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 21, pp. 17864–17870, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Okamura, T. Harada, S. Wang et al., “Expression of TrkB and BDNF is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer,” Lung Cancer, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 100–106, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Guo, X. Hou, H. Zhang et al., “More expressions of BDNF and TrkB in multiple hepatocellular carcinoma and anti-BDNF or K252a induced apoptosis, suppressed invasion of HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Roesler, C. B. De Farias, A. L. Abujamra, A. L. Brunetto, and G. Schwartsmann, “BDNF/TrkB signaling as an anti-tumor target,” Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1473–1475, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. J. Thiele, Z. Li, and A. E. Mckee, “On Trk—the TrkB signal transduction pathway is an increasingly important target in cancer biology,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 5962–5967, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. De Farias, D. B. Rosemberg, T. E. Heinen et al., “BDNF/TrkB content and interaction with gastrin-releasing peptide receptor blockade in colorectal cancer,” Oncology, vol. 79, no. 5-6, pp. 430–439, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tanaka, Y. Okugawa, Y. Toiyama et al., “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-induced tropomyosin-related kinase B (Trk B) signaling is a potential therapeutic target for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, article e96410, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. de Farias, T. E. Heinen, R. P. dos Santos, A. L. Abujamra, G. Schwartsmann, and R. Roesler, “BDNF/TrkB signaling protects HT-29 human colon cancer cells from EGFR inhibition,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 425, no. 2, pp. 328–332, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Weiser, “AJCC 8th edition: colorectal cancer,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1454-1455, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Wang, C. Li, F. Zhang, X. Ma, and X. Gai, “Clinical value of combined determination of serum B7-H4 with carcinoembryonic antigen, osteopontin, or tissue polypeptide-specific antigen for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer,” Disease Markers, vol. 2018, Article ID 4310790, 9 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Karege, G. Bondolfi, N. Gervasoni, M. Schwald, J.-M. Aubry, and G. Bertschy, “Low brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum of depressed patients probably results from lowered platelet BDNF release unrelated to platelet reactivity,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1068–1072, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. C. Noshirwani, R. U. Van Stolk, L. A. Rybicki, and G. J. Beck, “Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 51, 4, Part 1, pp. 433–437, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polyakova, K. Stuke, K. Schuemberg, K. Mueller, P. Schoenknecht, and M. L. Schroeter, “BDNF as a biomarker for successful treatment of mood disorders: a systematic & quantitative meta-analysis,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 174, pp. 432–440, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Suchanek-Raif, P. Raif, M. Kowalczyk et al., “An analysis of five TrkB gene polymorphisms in schizophrenia and the interaction of its haplotype with rs6265 BDNF gene polymorphism,” Disease Markers, vol. 2020, Article ID 4789806, 7 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Skilleter, C. S. Weickert, A. Vercammen, R. Lenroot, and T. W. Weickert, “Peripheral BDNF: a candidate biomarker of healthy neural activity during learning is disrupted in schizophrenia,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 841–854, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Brodeur, “Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 203–216, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Akil, A. Perraud, M. O. Jauberteau, and M. Mathonnet, “Tropomyosin-related kinase B/brain derived-neurotrophic factor signaling pathway as a potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 490–500, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ho, A. Eggert, T. Hishiki et al., “Resistance to chemotherapy mediated by TrkB in neuroblastomas,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 6462–6466, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Huang, C. Lin, H. Y. Lin et al., “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates cell motility in human colon cancer,” Endocrine Related Cancer, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 455–464, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. V. Brierley, I. K. Priebe, L. Purins et al., “Serum concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are decreased in colorectal cancer patients,” Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 67–73, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Milovanovic Alempijevic, M. Stojkovic Lalosevic, I. Dumic et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of platelet count and platelet indices in noninvasive assessment of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients,” Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2017, Article ID 6070135, 5 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Zhe Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

468

Downloads

873

Citations