Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 8884229 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8884229

Neda M. Bogari, Amr A. Amin, Husni H. Rayes, Ahmed Abdelmotelb, Mohiuddin M. Taher, Faisal A. Al-Allaf, Abdellatif Bouazzaoui, Luke O’Gorman, John W. Holloway, "Next Generation Exome Sequencing of Pediatric Asthma Identifies Rare and Novel Variants in Candidate Genes", Disease Markers, vol. 2021, Article ID 8884229, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8884229

Next Generation Exome Sequencing of Pediatric Asthma Identifies Rare and Novel Variants in Candidate Genes

Academic Editor: Peng fei Li
Received17 Aug 2020
Revised21 Jan 2021
Accepted03 Feb 2021
Published09 Feb 2021


Multiple genes have been implicated to have a role in asthma predisposition by association studies. Pediatric patients often manifest a more extensive form of this disease and a particularly severe disease course. It is likely that genetic predisposition could play a more substantial role in this group. This study is aimed at identifying the spectrum of rare and novel variation in known pediatric asthma susceptibility genes using whole exome sequencing analysis in nine individual cases of childhood onset allergic asthma. DNA samples from the nine children with a history of bronchial asthma diagnosis underwent whole exome sequencing on Ion Proton. For each patient, the entire complement of rare variation within strongly associated candidate genes was catalogued. The analysis showed 21 variants in the subjects, 13 had been previously identified, and 8 were novel. Also, among of which, nineteen were nonsynonymous and 2 were nonsense. With regard to the novel variants, the 2 nonsynonymous variants in the PRKG1 gene (PRKG1: p.C519W and PRKG1: p.G520W) were presented in 4 cases, and a nonsynonymous variant in the MAVS gene (MAVS: p.A45V) was identified in 3 cases. The variants we found in this study will enrich the variant spectrum and build up the database in the Saudi population. Novel eight variants were identified in the study which provides more evidence in the genetic susceptibility in asthma among Saudi children, providing a genetic screening map for the molecular genetic determinants of allergic disease in Saudi children, with the goal of reducing the impact of chronic diseases on the health and the economy. We believe that the advanced specified statistical filtration/annotation programs used in this study succeeded to release such results in a preliminary study, exploring the genetic map of that disease in Saudi children.

1. Introduction

Asthma and other allergic diseases, including allergic rhinitis, eczema, and food allergy, cause a substantial burden of disease in childhood. Although a rapid increase in asthma and allergies has been identified over the latter part of the 20th century, the reasons for this are still unknown [1]. Recent changes in environmental factors and their interactions with genetic profiles have been suggested as major factors responsible for the increase in asthma and allergic diseases [2].

Asthma, a chronic inflammatory respiratory condition characterized by hyperresponsive airways and reversible airflow obstruction, is a substantial public health problem that affects nearly 155 million individuals worldwide with the prevalence of current asthma and is higher in children compared than adults [35]. Although environmental factors are important, there are strong genetic predispositions for the development of allergic diseases. It has been reported that there are more than 100 candidate genes in every chromosome which are identified to have a linkage with asthma and the strength of association of these single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with asthma varieties in different parts of the world [35]. A better knowledge of asthma susceptibility will hold promise for a better understanding of the pathology, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and management of this increasingly frequent disease.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, in particular exome sequencing, currently represents the most powerful and cost effective approach to identifying variation in the human genome and has already been shown to uncover important disease-causing variation missed by GWAS studies [613]. Previous studies have implicated rare variants in asthma and asthma-related traits for a number of relevant genes [14, 15], suggesting that rare variants may indeed play an important role in asthma susceptibility.

Chromosome 17q21 was the first asthma susceptibility locus discovered by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [10, 14, 1619]. However, none of the genes within the locus had previously been implicated in asthma pathogenesis. SNPs in17q21 showing highly significant associations with childhood asthma correlated with the expression of ORMDL3 transcripts, suggesting ORMDL3 was a plausible asthma candidate gene in the locus [1]. Later, allele-specific gene expression was also observed for other genes in the 17q21 locus [20].

At least twelve GWAS of asthma have been conducted and have yielded numerous associations, with the most significant (and in most cases replicated) associations occurring in or near the following genes: ORMDL3 [1, 2], PDE4D [21], HLADRB1 [2], HLA-DQ [2, 3], RAD50-IL13 [3], DENND1B [4], TLE4 [5], SMAD3 [2], IL1RL1 [22], IL18R1 [2], IL33 [2], IL2RB [2], RORA [2], and SLC22A5 [2]. These findings have greatly expanded our understanding of the disease, having identified several novel genetic loci that had never previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma (e.g., ORMDL3, RAD50, DENND1B, and TLE4). Despite these successes, no definitive causal variants have been identified in any of these genes. It is asserted that the associated variants are in LD with the causal variants in these genes, but more effort must be made to identify causal variants so that the biology of these genes in the etiology of asthma can be better understood.

Despite the success of GWAS in identifying the associated genetic variants for complex diseases and more than 1000 studies in the past few years conducted to identify the genetic complexity of many immune diseases including asthma, this approach still could—in part—explains the heritability of asthma regarding the clinical prediction of phenotypic heritability and immunological pathways [23].

This study is aimed at revealing the genetic determinants for pediatric asthma in Saudi Arabia using whole exome sequencing technique, reviewing the results with similar international studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Recruitment of Pediatric Asthma Cohort of Patients

Seventy-nine children included in this study were initially selected from the Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic, Maternity Children Hospital Makkah, KSA, between Jan 2014 and Oct 2015. All children had been diagnosed with asthma after clinical evaluation in addition to both physiological assessment including pulmonary function tests (PFT) and the use of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire (modified for the population) (note that PFT was not considered for young age who was not able to perform the test properly). They were aged between 5 and 14 years at the time of recruitment. Written informed consent was obtained from the attending parents of all the children. In the initial recruitment interview, clinical data and venous blood samples (3 ml of whole blood for CBC and DNA extraction and 3 ml for plasma separation) were collected.

Additional comprehensive clinical data were extracted from their medical records with their consent. For each patient, the information gathered included gender, dates of birth and initial diagnosis, laboratory investigations, physiological assessment, disease history, parents’ history for any allergic and/or other autoimmune diseases, medication history (use of steroids, immunomodulators, and biological therapies), and history of potential allergen such as carpet, plants, and/or animal exposure.

2.2. Selection of Samples for Whole Exome Analysis

Nine asthmatic patients submitted for NGS were recruited based on both clinical evaluation and phenotypic criteria using the following: (i)Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines [24] in addition to the use of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire (modified for the recruited patients) as initial identification with considerations of medications used (β-agonists and steroids)(ii)A history of respiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheezing, and coughing that varies in intensity over time, as well as variable expiratory airflow limitation(iii)Physiological tests including both PFT and the spirometry measurements(iv)Only the patients not recorded with any other allergy symptoms—like skin or food allergy—who were submitted to whole exome sequencing (see (Table 1))

IDDiagnosisGenderAge at diagnosis (year)Blood eosinophil (%)PFTTreatment
FEV1 %

1BAM5.10.289%β-Agonists and steroids
2BAF5.90.2290%β-Agonists and steroids
3BA/obeseM80.2689%β-Agonists and steroids
4BAM60.1892%β-Agonists and steroids
5BAM5.50.4183%β-Agonists and steroids
6BAM6.50.2987%β-Agonists and steroids
7BAM67.57%NAβ-Agonists and antihistaminic
8BA (uncontrolled)M7.510.6%NAβ-Agonists and steroids
9BAM50.3287%β-Agonists and steroids

Table legend: phenotypic data of the patients (in addition to clinical and physiological assessment data including pulmonary function test, blood eosinophil percent, and the treatment used. PFT not performed for both samples 7 and 8). Note 1: sample 9 was selected but removed after Qc of genomic data. Note 2: the ID column includes the code number of the sample between brackets. BA: bronchial asthma; PFT: pulmonary function test.

This study will be extended by performing genotyping for all selected patients for measuring the incidence of the identified variants.

2.3. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA anticoagulated peripheral venous blood samples using a spin column method using the recommended Applied Biosystem DNA extraction kit (catalogue number: K182001). All genomic DNA was quantified using a Nano-Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The DNA quality was assessed by the 260/280 ratio (1.8-2.0). For the library preparations, DNA was measured again using Qubit (Invitrogen) fluorometers, for adjusting all samples to 100 ng equally (accepted concentration was above 50 ng/μl). Then, the libraries were purified using a magnetic plate and subsequently quantified using Ion Library TaqMan quantitation kit by real-time PCR.

2.4. Whole Exome Sequencing

Whole exome sequencing was performed for nine patients’ DNA samples using Ion Torrent technology (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Libraries were prepared following the protocol described in Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY library preparation user guide (Publication number MAN0010084) using Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit Plus (Cat. No. 4488990). One hundred nanograms of genomic DNA was used in library preparation with Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY Kit 1×8 (Cat. No. A38262); then, the libraries were purified using a magnetic plate and subsequently quantified using Ion Library TaqMan quantitation kit (Part number 4468802) and Real-time PCR instrument 7500 Fast (Life Technologies, USA). Each sample was assigned a distinct barcode using an IonXpress barcode adapters 1–16 kit (Cat. No. 4471250). Barcoded libraries were diluted to 100 pM; three libraries were pooled and subjected to template preparation on Ion Sphere Particles (ISP) using the Ion OneTouch 2 System and the Ion PI Template OT2 Hi-Q Kit. Each templated ISP was loaded on the Ion PI v3 chip and sequenced on the Ion Proton instrument (Life Technologies, USA) using Ion PI Hi-Q sequencing Kit. Base calling and alignment were performed on a Torrent Suite v4.2 Server.

2.5. Informatic Analysis

Filtering low quality reads and removal of adapters were followed by alignment against the human reference genome (hg19 build). GATK v3.7 [25] was used to call SNPs and short indels in a multisample VCF file. GATK v3.7 variant quality score recalibration (VQSR) was applied to the dataset. Annotation was performed using AnnoVar [26] with a database of RefSeq transcripts [27], the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) [28] and pathogenicity scores including Sort Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [29], PhyloP, Phast Cons [30], Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP++) [31], and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) [32].

Verify BamID v1.1.13 software was used to estimate possible contamination, and a “free mix” value threshold of 0.02 was applied [33]. Gene coverage was determined using SAM tools v1.3.1 [34] and BED tools v2.17.0 [35]. Variants with GATK quality score recalibration (VQSR) tranche >99% were excluded. Synonymous variants and variants which were found in were also excluded from the analysis. Variants were prioritized by damaging pathogenicity scores (, [36], and ).

2.6. Selection of a Panel of Known Asthma Target Genes

All studies in the GWAS catalogue with “asthma” as a phenotype or keyword till 28 March 2017 were reviewed, and studies identifying asthma susceptibility variants that included pediatric subjects were identified and the significant loci retrieved. Following this, 16 additional genes from four studies were added following manual review of the literature. For a list of studies contributing to the candidate gene list (see Supplementary Table 3-3). In a total of twenty loci encompassing 131 potential candidate genes among which 110 genes were covered in this analysis.

3. Results

Verified BamIDf remix values for eight samples were below the 0.02 threshold and did not indicate substantial levels of contamination. One sample (subject 9) showed evidence for contamination and was excluded from further analysis. The minimum mean read depth was 47.7x, and the minimum coverage at 10x depth was 86.6% across the eight samples (Supplementary Table 2-3).

In a total of 8 subjects, 21 variants were identified following filtering for potential functionality, among which 13 had previously been identified in dbSNP and 8 were novel (Table 2). Nineteen of the 21 variants were non-synonymous and 2 were nonsense (stop gain). Among the 13 nonsynonymous variants in dbSNP, 2 variants have been previously studied. The rs3923647 was reported to be associated with increased production of the Th1 cytokines, IFN-γ and IL-2, following BCG vaccination [37]. The variant rs16889462 was identified and encoded for SLC30A8 gene reported for many functions in T2D pathophysiology involving the lowering of T2D risk in case of reduced SLC30A8 gene activity [38]. With regard to the novel variants, the 2 nonsynonymous variants in the PRKG1 gene (54041969 and 5404970) were present in 4 cases (1, 3, 4, and 5), and a nonsynonymous variant in the MAVS gene (3842992) was identified in 3 cases (4, 5, and 9).

ChromosomeLocation hg19REFALTGeneExonic. FuncAmino aciddbSNP144Allele frequencyNovel1-siftCADD phredGerp++12345678

chr1152488110GACRCT1Nonsynonymous SNVp.R84K.Yes.22.84.73Het
chr1158908886CTPYHIN1Nonsynonymous SNVp.S143Frs1478275240.01070.00723.11.27Het
chr1180651520GCXPR1Nonsynonymous SNVp.A32P.Yes0.013305.71Het
chr2218683301CTTNS1Nonsynonymous SNVp.D1127Nrs1844517580.00060.01325.74.74Het
chr438799539TATLR1Nonsynonymous SNVp.H305Lrs39236470.02960.00221.14.79Het
chr4119952527CTSYNPO2Nonsynonymous SNVp.P866Lrs7459757782.47E-050.04229.85.76Het
chr4119978796CTSYNPO2Nonsynonymous SNVp.R1134Wrs615296350.0057026.23.99Het
chr632946010GTBRD2Nonsynonymous SNVp.K562N.Yes0.12822.82.29Het
chr632946011CABRD2Nonsynonymous SNVp.H563N.Yes0.30420.55.24Het
chr6165703388ATC6orf118Nonsynonymous SNVp.I430Nrs2022219044.97E-050.03722.81.26Het
chr8118184784GASLC30A8Nonsynonymous SNVp.R325Qrs168894620.01630.09919.95-2.29Het
chr935704426CTTLN1Nonsynonymous SNVp.A1984Trs356422900.0033120.95Het
chr1053822301AGPRKG1Nonsynonymous SNVp.N267Srs349974940.04450.05323.35.76Het
chr1054041969TGPRKG1Nonsynonymous SNVp.C519W.Yes029.15.49HetHetHetHet
chr1054041970GTPRKG1Nonsynonymous SNVp.G520W.Yes0345.49HetHetHetHet
chr1280645886GAOTOGLNonsynonymous SNVp.R388Qrs7471862653.81E-050.064355.95
chr197267725CAINSRNonsynonymous SNVp.G95W.Yes0335.19HetHet
chr197267726ACINSRStop gainp.Y94.Yes.32-8.95HetHet
chr1935434582GTZNF30Nonsynonymous SNVp.G239Wrs1422998230.02140.00426.12.12HetHet
chr1958213743GAZNF154Stop gainp.R192rs749395050.0088.24.9-2.67HetHet
chr203842992CTMAVSNonsynonymous SNVp.A45Vrs7792341238.27E-06026.93.22HetHetHet

Chrom: chromosome; Location hg19: location of 5 base of variant in hg19; REF: reference allele; ALT: alternative allele; Gene: gene symbol; Exonic. Func: consequence of the variant; Amino acid: amino acid change; dbSNP144: rsID in dbSNP144; Allele frequency: alternate allele frequency from ExAC database (all populations); Novel; 1-sift: sort intolerant from tolerant; CADD phred: Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score (Phred scale); GERP++: Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling; sample IDs: “het” indicates a heterozygous genotype. Note: sample number 9 primarily selected was removed after Qc of genomic data.

4. Discussion

This report describes the results of a first study of exome sequencing in Saudi children diagnosed with asthma. Exome sequencing of eight children in this study has identified 21 potentially deleterious SNPs in known asthma genes; among them, eight novel variants and 13 variants previously deposited in dbSNP.

In this study, the genetic association was not repeated in the selected samples because this study was not designed as a family-based study. Our study was presented to define—for the first time in KSA—the genetic variants that are mostly associated with the asthma development in pediatric age in Makkah region through a large asthma GWAS cohort study, recognizing the possible genetic causes that implicated in asthma and perhaps also suggesting related biological pathways that play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma. Using advanced filtration and annotation programs, the total resulted variants were reduced to only 28 candidate genetic variants on 10 loci which were associated with childhood-onset disease.

On chromosome 1, three genetic variants were identified in three different samples (cases 3, 4, and 7) with two novel variants. One was reported previously, rs147827524, encoded for pyrin and HIN domain family member 1 gene (PYHIN1) that has been accounted for HIN200 proteins which are primarily nuclear proteins involved in transcriptional regulation of genes important for cell cycle control, differentiation, and apoptosis in addition to a surprisingly large proportion of asthma risk in people of African descent [39]. The two novel SNPs were discovered, rs152488110 and rs180651520, encoded for both cysteine-rich C-terminal 1 gene (CRCT1) and xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 gene (XPR1), respectively. The CRCT1 SNP is located near the end of the exon region in the gene and among many nonsynonymous reported SNPs. Hence, we supposed that it will be of nonsignificant effect on the protein function. However, the second variant, XPR1, has already been mentioned to play a role in modulating human airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction, cell growth, and proinflammatory cytokine production that promote bronchoconstriction, airway inflammation, and remodeling in asthma [40]. On chromosome 2, only one variant was identified that was reported before, rs184451758, encoded for tensin 1 gene (TNS-1), the gene that has been accounted essentially for myofibroblast differentiation and extracellular matrix formation. The polymorphism in that gene is reported to be significantly associated with full form COPD risk [41]. On chromosome 4, three polymorphic variants were identified, one previously reported, rs3923647, encoded to Toll-like receptors1 (TLR1) polymorphisms that seems to play a role in susceptibility to asthma, atopic eczema, and allergic rhinitis [42]. The other two polymorphisms identified, rs745975778 and rs61529635, were reported for the same gene, synaptopodin 2 (SYNPO2), that was reported to be associated with total serum IgE in asthmatics in an independent GWAS, suggesting roles for this gene in asthma [43]. On chromosome 6, two closed sequentially novel variants were identified, rs32946010 and rs32946011, encoded for the same transcription factor element gene, bromodomain (BRD2), located on exon 8 (of 12 exons for that gene) where its protein has been shown to modulate transcription, in particular, in cell cycle-induced transcriptional activation. It has been reported recently that BRD2 protein inhibition attenuates neutrophil-dominant allergic airway disease in mice models [44]. On chromosome 8, one nonsynonymous polymorphic variant was identified, rs16889462, that was reported previously encoding one of the zinc efflux transporters, solute carrier family 30 member 8 (SLC30A8), which has been classified as one of the major components for providing zinc to insulin maturation and/or storage processes in insulin-secreting pancreatic β-cells. Five genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified SLC30A8 polymorphism rs13266634 among Asian and European but not African populations [45]. On chromosome 9, only one reported polymorphism was identified, rs35642290, encoded for the cytoskeletal protein, talin 1 (TLN-1), which is considered one of the genes that might be associated with total IgE in asthmatics [46]. On chromosome 10, surprisingly, three variants in the same gene were identified including one previously reported SNP and two sequential novel ones, rs54041969 and rs54041970, identified in 50% of samples (cases 1, 3, 4, and 5) located on exon 14 (of 18 exons reported for that gene). All three variants encode the same protein kinase c GMP-dependent 1 gene (PRKG-1). All PRKG protein isoforms act as key mediators of the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway and are important components of many signal transduction processes in diverse cell types [47]. It was reported that asthma is typically associated with high levels of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) which reduce the normal levels of S-nitrosothiols, which act as a bronchodilator in the airway [47].

On chromosome 12, one previously reported SNP, rs747186265, was identified—in only one sample (case number 6)—encoded for the otogelin-like gene/protein, which has been accounted to be expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage. No significant ear complications were recorded for that child in our study. We suppose that this variant was not significantly involved in the pathophysiology of asthma development. Also, we suppose that this SNP does not affect the protein structure and function even if it is classified as nonsynonymous, and/or we recommend performing further studies for those particular SNP effects. On chromosome 19, four polymorphisms were identified in our study including two previously reported SNPs, rs142299823 and rs74939505, encoded for both genes of zinc finger protein family, ZNF30 and ZNF154, respectively, involved in the process of DNA binding transcription factor activity. Additionally, two novel variants were identified both in two children in the analysis (cases 4 and 5), nonsynonymous (rs7267725) and stop gain (rs7267726). Both variants were encoded for the insulin receptor (INSR) gene region that was suggestively associated with asthma risk [48]. On chromosome 20, only one nonsynonymous previously reported variant, rs779234123, was identified—in three samples (cases 4, 5, and 8)—encoded for mitochondrial antiviral-signaling gene (MAVS), which expresses the protein required for protein kinase activity which is essential for gene expression. Impaired antiviral interferon expression may be involved in asthma exacerbations commonly caused by rhinovirus infections in asthmatic patients [49].

Numerous genetic and molecular studies have been carried out in the field of asthma in both the children and adults previously [5060]. Among genetic studies, exome/NG sequencing studies have been documented throughout the global populations [61, 62]. The confirmed observations along with the genetic conclusions confirm the attractive genetic susceptibility factors in asthma patients. It is possible that genetic and nongenetic novel and documented variants might play a major role in the Saudi asthma patients. However, the limited patient’s number and missing the screening of novel variants present a limitation of this study.

Not only genetic factors but also environmental, racial, and ethnic factors are associated with the asthma etiology; also, the dietary factors may have an active and direct impact on asthma symptoms [6365]. Asthma can be triggered by exposure to many environmental factors [66]. Allergic asthma which is caused by allergens like pet dander, pests, dust mites, and mold is more common in children than nonallergic asthma. Nonallergic asthma can be caused by certain factors such as viruses, anxiety, stress, cold or dry air, and smoke. The incidence of allergic asthma is highest in childhood, while the incidence of nonallergic asthma is peaks in late adulthood [67]. It is reported that the African American and Hispanics are more susceptible to asthma, and the morbidity is high in this category [68, 69]. Children living in single-parent households are twice likely to be diagnosed with compared to children living of married parents [70]. However, to our knowledge, how these factors are contributing in the Arab population to asthma etiology is not fully understood, because limited studies are available regarding this disease from Middle Eastern countries.

4.1. Study Strengths and Limitations

The results of this study are unique genetic analyses of children with asthma in Saudi Arabia, identifying novel nonsynonymous polymorphisms that may correlate with severe asthma and weak response to treatment in children. This study will form the basis of future research in the field and would be of archival and perhaps diagnostic purposes.

This study has a limitation in terms of sample size also. Although we have initially recruited 79 cases with asthma in this study, due to budget constraints, we could do only 9 cases analysis by whole exome sequencing. This study has a limited number of patients and would benefit from larger sample size and perhaps comparison with genetic profiles in different countries.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the initial exome sequenced study implemented in the Saudi children diagnosed with asthma. Based on early studies and the results we found in this study, we assume that genetic variants might play a role in the increased susceptibility for the development of asthma. Other variants present in this study cannot be avoided considering the high number of loci and its specific genetic role involved within the disease in the global population. Future studies recommend to screen more patients for novel variants within the Saudi population to rule out its role in the asthma disease.


DNA:Deoxyribonucleic acid
EDTA:Ethylene Diamine tetra acetic acid
SNP:Single-nucleotide polymorphism
QC:Quality control
KSA:Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability

Data are available in the Supplementary Materials provided.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by both the Medical Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University (Ethical Approval Certificate No. 18 dated 8/2/1435H) and the Committee of Ethics and Medical Research in the Maternity & Children Hospital Makkah (Certificate of Approval No. 47/25/107862 dated 11/12/2013).

Conflicts of Interest

All investigators have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

Neda M. Bogari and Ahmed Abdelmotelb are responsible for the conceptualization. Husni H. Rayes curated the data. Neda M. Bogari acquired funding. Husni H. Rayes and Amr A. Amin did the investigation. Mohiuddin M. Taher, Amr A. Amin, and Hosni El-Rayes are responsible for the methodology. Neda M. Bogari is responsible for the resources. John W. Holloway and Neda M. Bogari did the supervision. Luke O’Gorman and Neda M. Bogari analyzed the data. Amr A. Amin and Husni H. Rayes wrote the original draft. Amr A. Amin, Abdellatif Bouazzaoui, and Faisal A. Al-Allaf did the review and editing. Neda M. Bogari, Amr A. Amin, and John W. Holloway did the validation.


The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code 20UQU0069DSR. We are thankful to Dr. Ahmed Shawky and the staff of the Science and Technology Unit (STU) and Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah, for their continuous support. The authors also acknowledge the support of Mr. Abdulmoniem Gowda and Mr. Mohammad Adil of Integrated Gulf Biosystems as well as Dr. Muhmmed Noor and Mr. Soud Abdulraof A. Khogeer from the Department of Biochemistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Table 1-3: mean depth, coverage at 10x depth across the target region and VerifyBamID freemix values for each sample.

Supplementary 2. Table 2-3: gene coverage for 107 genes from the asthma gene panel.

Supplementary 3. Table 3-3: list of selected genes associated with asthma.


  1. S. S. Braman, “The global burden of asthma,” Chest, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 4s–12s, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. K. Huang, Q. Zhang, Z. Qiu, and K. F. Chung, “Mechanistic impact of outdoor air pollution on asthma and allergic diseases,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. H. Liu, J. D. Spahn, and L. DYM, Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, Elsevier, New Delhi, 2004.
  4. G. Malerba and P. F. Pignatti, “A review of asthma genetics: gene expression studies and recent candidates,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. Vercelli, “Discovering susceptibility genes for asthma and allergy,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 169–182, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. A. Cusanovich, C. Billstrand, X. Zhou et al., “The combination of a genome-wide association study of lymphocyte count and analysis of gene expression data reveals novel asthma candidate genes,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2111–2123, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. T. Johansen, J. Wang, M. B. Lanktree et al., “Excess of rare variants in genes identified by genome-wide association study of hypertriglyceridemia,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 684–687, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. W. Holloway, P. R. Dunbar, G. A. Riley et al., “Association of β2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms with severe asthma,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1097–1103, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. The International Lung Cancer Consortium, GIANT consortium, M. S. Artigas et al., “Genome-wide association and large-scale follow up identifies 16 new loci influencing lung function,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1082–1090, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. I. Wan, D. P. Strachan, D. M. Evans et al., “A genome-wide association study to identify genetic determinants of atopy in subjects from the United Kingdom,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 223–231.e3, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. C. Yao, M. L. Kuo, L. C. See et al., “The RANTES promoter polymorphism: a genetic risk factor for near-fatal asthma in Chinese children,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 1285–1292, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Kabesch, “Next generation genetics in allergy,” Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 407, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. G. Lohr, P. Stojanov, M. S. Lawrence et al., “Discovery and prioritization of somatic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by whole-exome sequencing,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 3879–3884, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. F. Moffatt, I. G. Gut, F. Demenais et al., “A large-scale, consortium-based genomewide association study of asthma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 13, pp. 1211–1221, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. T. Schroer, J. M. Biagini Myers, P. H. Ryan et al., “Associations between multiple environmental exposures and glutathione S-transferase P1 on persistent wheezing in a birth cohort,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 401–408.e1, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Akhabir and A. J. Sandford, “Genome-wide association studies for discovery of genes involved in asthma,” Respirology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 396–406, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. F. Moffatt, M. Kabesch, L. Liang et al., “Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 470–473, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. J. Verlaan, S. Berlivet, G. M. Hunninghake et al., “Allele-Specific Chromatin Remodeling in the _ZPBP2/GSDMB/ORMDL3_ Locus Associated with the Risk of Asthma and Autoimmune Disease,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 377–393, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Lluis, M. Schedel, J. Liu et al., “Asthma-associated polymorphisms in 17q21 influence cord blood _ORMDL3_ and _GSDMA_ gene expression and IL-17 secretion,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1587–1594.e6, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Q. Lu and W. Liao, “Screening and functional pathway analysis of genes associated with pediatric allergic asthma using a DNA microarray,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 4197–4203, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Haagerup, T. Bjerke, P. O. Schiotz, H. G. Binderup, R. Dahl, and T. A. Kruse, “Asthma and atopy - a total genome scan for susceptibility genes,” Allergy, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 680–686, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. T. Salam, P. C. Lin, E. L. Avol, W. J. Gauderman, and F. D. Gilliland, “Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, glutathione S-transferase P1, traffic and childhood asthma,” Thorax, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1050–1057, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. J. Hebbring, “The challenges, advantages and future of phenome-wide association studies,” Immunology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. O'Byrne, “Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention,” Tech. Rep., 2020, http://www.ginasthma.org. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. McKenna, M. Hanna, E. Banks et al., “The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data,” Genome Research, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1297–1303, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Wang, M. Li, and H. Hakonarson, “ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 16, article e164, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. D. Pruitt, T. Tatusova, and D. R. Maglott, “NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, pp. D501–D504, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Exome Aggregation Consortium, M. Lek, K. J. Karczewski et al., “Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans,” Nature, vol. 536, no. 7616, pp. 285–291, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. C. Ng and S. Henikoff, “SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 3812–3814, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Siepel, G. Bejerano, J. S. Pedersen et al., “Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1034–1050, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. V. Davydov, D. L. Goode, M. Sirota, G. M. Cooper, A. Sidow, and S. Batzoglou, “Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, article e1001025, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Kircher, D. M. Witten, P. Jain, B. J. O'Roak, G. M. Cooper, and J. Shendure, “A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants,” Nature Genetics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 310–315, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. Jun, M. Flickinger, K. N. Hetrick et al., “Detecting and estimating contamination of human DNA samples in sequencing and array-based genotype data,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 839–848, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker et al., “The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2078-2079, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. R. Quinlan and I. M. Hall, “BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features,” Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 841-842, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Dong, P. Wei, X. Jian et al., “Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2125–2137, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. K. Randhawa, M. S. Shey, A. Keyser et al., “Association of human TLR1 and TLR6 deficiency with altered immune responses to BCG vaccination in South African infants,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 7, no. 8, article e1002174, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Go-T2D Consortium, T2D-GENES Consortium, J. Flannick et al., “Loss-of-function mutations in _SLC30A8_ protect against type 2 diabetes,” Nature Genetics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 357–363, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. C. Barnes, A. V. Grant, N. N. Hansel, P. Gao, and G. M. Dunston, “African Americans with asthma: genetic insights,” Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. J. Ammit, A. T. Hastie, L. C. Edsall et al., “Sphingosine 1-phosphate modulates human airway smooth muscle cell functions that promote inflammation and airway remodeling in asthma,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1212–1214, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. J. Castaldi, M. H. Cho, A. A. Litonjua et al., “The association of genome-wide significant spirometric loci with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1147–1153, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Törmänen, M. Korppi, J. Teräsjärvi et al., “Polymorphism in the gene encoding toll-like receptor 10 may be associated with asthma after bronchiolitis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2956, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Bunyavanich and E. E. Schadt, “Systems biology of asthma and allergic diseases: a multiscale approach,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. L. Manni, S. Mandalapu, A. Salmeron, J. M. Lora, J. K. Kolls, and J. F. Alcorn, “Bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibition attenuates neutrophil-dominant allergic airway disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 43139, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. Cheng, D. Zhang, L. Zhou, J. Zhao, and B. Chen, “Association between SLC30A8 rs13266634 polymorphism and type 2 diabetes risk: a meta-analysis,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 21, p. 2178, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  46. J.-H. Kim, H. S. Cheong, J. S. Park et al., “A genome-wide association study of total serum and mite-specific IgEs in asthma patients,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, article e71958, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Ghosh and S. C. Erzurum, “Modulation of asthma pathogenesis by nitric oxide pathways and therapeutic opportunities,” Drug Discovery Today: Disease Mechanisms, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. e89–e94, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. J. White, O. Risse-Adams, P. Goddard et al., “Novel genetic risk factors for asthma in African American children: precision medicine and the SAGE II study,” Immunogenetics, vol. 68, no. 6-7, pp. 391–400, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. Akbarshahi, M. Menzel, S. Ramu, I. Mahmutovic Persson, L. Bjermer, and L. Uller, “House dust mite impairs antiviral response in asthma exacerbation models through its effects on TLR 3,” Allergy, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1053–1063, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. Al-Herz, “A systematic review of the prevalence of atopic diseases in children on the Arabian peninsula,” Medical Principles and Practice, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 436–442, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Cao, L. Tian, Z. Li et al., “Interleukin-7 gene polymorphism rs766736182 associates with the risk of asthma in children,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 33, no. 2, p. e22675, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Charrad, W. Kaabachi, A. Rafrafi, A. Berraies, K. Hamzaoui, and A. Hamzaoui, “IL-8 gene variants and expression in childhood asthma,” Lung, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 749–757, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. Fu, L. Fu, Y. Cai, H. Zhao, and W. Fu, “Association between polymorphisms of glucocorticoid receptor genes and asthma: a meta-analysis,” Cellular and Molecular Biology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 13–23, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. H. Kim, S. Y. Lee, M. J. Kang et al., “Association of genetic polymorphisms with atopic dermatitis, clinical severity and total IgE: a replication and extended study,” Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 397–405, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. L. Lee, J. H. Chen, C. M. Wang, M. L. Chen, and B. F. Hwang, “Association of air pollution exposure and interleukin-13 haplotype with the risk of aggregate bronchitic symptoms in children,” eBioMedicine, vol. 29, pp. 70–77, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Z. Liu, J. Li, K. Wang, Q. Tan, W. Tan, and G. Guo, “Association between TGF-β1 polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility among the Chinese: a meta-analysis,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 433–442, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Q. Mei and J. Qu, “Interleukin-13 +2044 G/A and +1923C/T polymorphisms are associated with asthma susceptibility in Asians: a meta-analysis,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 51, article e9203, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. J. Sun, L. Y. Zou, D. M. Tong, X. Y. Lu, J. Li, and C. B. Deng, “Association between ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 gene polymorphism and risk of childhood asthma: a meta-analysis,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 50, no. 10, article e6148, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Y. Zheng, H. Wang, L. Luo et al., “A meta-analysis of the association between CTLA-4 genetic polymorphism and susceptibility of asthma,” Medicine, vol. 97, no. 28, article e11380, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y. Zhu, X. Yan, C. Zhai, L. Yang, and M. Li, “Association between risk of asthma and gene polymorphisms in CHI3L1 and CHIA: a systematic meta-analysis,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 193, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. C. Dannemiller, M. J. Mendell, J. M. Macher et al., “Next-generation DNA sequencing reveals that low fungal diversity in house dust is associated with childhood asthma development,” Indoor Air, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 236–247, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. T. DeWan, K. B. Egan, K. Hellenbrand et al., “Whole-exome sequencing of a pedigree segregating asthma,” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 95, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. T. Holgate, “Asthma: a simple concept but in reality a complex disease,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1339–1352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. A. Aligne, P. Auinger, R. S. Byrd, and M. Weitzman, “Risk factors for pediatric asthma,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 873–877, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. E. Vassilopoulou, G. N. Konstantinou, A. Dimitriou, Y. Manios, L. Koumbi, and N. G. Papadopoulos, “The impact of food histamine intake on asthma activity: a pilot study,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 3402, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Wilhelm, Y. Y. Meng, R. P. Rull, P. English, J. Balmes, and B. Ritz, “Environmental public health tracking of childhood asthma using California health interview survey, traffic, and outdoor air pollution data,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 1254–1260, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Pakkasela, P. Ilmarinen, J. Honkamäki et al., “Age-specific incidence of allergic and non-allergic asthma,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 9, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. J. Mitchell, A. L. Bilderback, and S. O. Okelo, “Racial disparities in asthma morbidity among pediatric patients seeking asthma specialist care,” Academic Pediatrics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 64–67, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. H. K. Hughes, E. C. Matsui, M. M. Tschudy, C. E. Pollack, and C. A. Keet, “Pediatric asthma health disparities: race, hardship, housing, and asthma in a national survey,” Academic Pediatrics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. T. Moncrief, A. F. Beck, J. M. Simmons, B. Huang, and R. S. Kahn, “Single parent households and increased child asthma morbidity,” The Journal of Asthma, vol. 51, pp. 260–266, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Neda M. Bogari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles