New Therapeutic Targets of Non-Small Cell Lung CancerView this Special Issue
Lower Expression of TWEAK is Associated with Poor Survival and Dysregulate TIICs in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Background. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and the most subtype is lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) greatly impact the prognosis of LUAD. Tumor necrosis factor–like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), signal via its receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14), dysregulates immune cell recruitment within tumor environment, thus promoting the progression of autoimmune diseases and cancer. We aimed to explore its role in LUAD. Methods. The expression level of TWEAK was explored in Tumor Immune Estimation Resource 2.0 (TIMER2.0) and Oncomine databases. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and Lung Cancer Explorer (LCE) databases were applied to evaluate the survival in correlation to TWEAK expression. TIICs were assessed with TIMER2.0 and TIDE datasets. The expression of TWEAK protein was detected in LUAD cell lines and also in tissue samples from LUAD patients via western blotting or combination with immunochemistry. Results. Our results showed that TWEAK was downregulated in LUAD tumors compared to normal tissues in TIMER2.0, Oncomine, cell lines, and clinical specimens. Poor survival was uncovered in lower TWEAK expression of LUAD patients in LCE ( [95% CI, 0.76-0.92]) and TCGA (, ) and [email protected] (, ) in TIDE. Multiple tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) were found closely correlated with TWEAK expression in LUAD, especially hematopoietic stem cell (, ), common lymphoid progenitor (, ), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) (, ). Conclusion. Lower level of TWEAK was linked with poor survival and aberrant recruitment and phenotype of TIICs in LUAD, which might motivate immune escape and weaken the effects of immunotherapy.
Lung cancer is a deadly cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality around the world, among which lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common pathological type. Currently, the prognosis of LUAD is still not satisfying, and the traditional treatments (including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) are limited to a subset of patients with partial remission. The emerging immunotherapy has achieved encouraging results in certain patients, but the prognosis of LUAD treated with immunotherapy was still varied even in the same TNM (Tumor, regional lymph Node, Metastasis) stage.
Tumor necrosis factor–related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), also termed TNFSF12, is located in chromosomal 17p13.1. TWEAK encodes many cytokines which is widely distributed in normal tissues and produces a variety of functions in cancer through combing with Fn14 (TNFRSF12A) such as angiogenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, fibrosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transform (EMT) [1–3]. Tumor necrosis factor-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), also known as TNFSF12, is located on chromosome 17p13.1 and is a member of the TNF superfamily. TWEAK encodes a variety of cytokines, is widely distributed in normal tissues, and binds in cancer by binding to a type I transmembrane protein whose unique receptor, fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14, TNFRSF12A), has so far been reported producing multiple functions by activating the tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor (TRAF) signaling pathway and the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway, such as angiogenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, fibrosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [1–3]. TWEAK is also the only ligand that binds to Fn14. Recent studies indicate that the aberrant TWEAK/FN14 pathway was engaged in some autoimmune diseases. TWEAK inhibits T helper 1 cells in the innate immune system by hindering IFN-γ and IL-12. Mutant TWEAK causes the lack of antibody by inhibiting the survival of B cells, and TWEAK inhibition can produce an antitumor effect through its regulation on macrophages [4, 5]. Therefore, TWEAK mediates crucial innate and adaptive immune pathways by modulating the function of various TIICs and shows an impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy and compound the prognosis of cancer patients [6–8].
In the present study, we investigated the TWEAK expression in LUAD in TIMER2.0 and TIDE databases and assessed the effect of TWEAK on the survival via TIDE and LCE databases. The relation between TWEAK and TIICs was explored in TIMER2.0 and TIDE. The results shown that low TWEAK expression indicates poor prognosis in LUAD and correlated with various TIICs, possibly due to the defective TWEAK/FN14 pathway.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. The Expression Profiles of TWEAK
The expression levels of TWEAK in cancers were explored from Tumor Immune Estimation Resource 2.0 (TIMER2.0) and Oncomine databases. TIMER2.0 (https://timer.cistrome.org) which based on a deconvolution method is a comprehensive web server which provides tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TIIC) information from gene expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [9–11]. Oncomine (https://www.oncomine.org/resource/login.html) is an integrated tool to analyze and validate gene expression and targets .
2.2. Prognostic Features of TWEAK
The survey of survival information of LUAD patients was carried out though Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and Lung Cancer Explorer (LCE) databases. The TIDE database was used to speculate on the functions of genes regulating LUAD immunity and to comprehensively analyze the immune evasion mechanism of immune dysfunction and rejection to LUAD, so as to effectively predict the effect of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy . LCE (https://lce.biohpc.swmed.edu/) is a powerful website to analyze gene expression and related clinical features in lung cancer .
2.3. The Correlation between TWEAK and TIICs
To analyze the association between TWEAK and TIICs, TIMER2.0 and TIDE databases were analyzed in this study. The relevance to TIICs (such as B cell, CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, neutrophil, macrophage, and dendritic cell) was carried out via the immune-gene module in TIMER2.0 and query gene module in TIDE (Cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CTL), and all the results from TIMER2.0 were adjusted with purity.
2.4. PPI Network Analysis
To analyze the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of TWEAK, the STING database was utilized. The STING database (https://string-db.org/) is a database including PPI networks from more than 24584628 proteins of 5090 organisms .
2.5. Cell Lines and Cell Culture
The human normal lung epithelial cell line HBE and NSCLC cell lines A549, H1299, H358, SPCA1, PC9, HCC827, and H1993 were purchased from the Cell Biology of Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (BIOIND, Israel), 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin (Gibco, USA) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2. The cells were passaged every 2-3 days by 0.25% trypsin (Gibco) and not cultured for more than 3 months.
2.6. Western Blotting
TWEAK and GAPDH were purchased from ImmunoWay (ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company, Plano, TX). The cells and tissue samples (Department of Thoracic, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University) were harvested and lysed with RIPA protein extraction reagent (Thermo Scientific, USA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail. Approval by the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Institutional Research Ethics Committee was obtained prior to collecting the archived tissue The protein concentrations were measured using the BCA assay (Pierce, CA, USA). Equal protein amounts were extracts and loaded per well and separated by electrophoresis on 8-10% SDS-PAGE and transferred on to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA). The membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% (wt/vol) nonfat milk and then incubated with primary antibodies in TBST containing 5% (wt/vol) nonfat milk at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with an appropriate secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase 1 h at 37°C, and the proteins were detected by Luminata Forte western HRP substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Anti-GAPDH levels were detected for normalization.
Protein expression detected by IHC was performed on LUAD pathological sections. We obtained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded recurrent LUAD specimens (40 patients) from the Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and prepared tissue sections (5 μm). Patient characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The specimens were immunostained using the UltraVision Quanto horseradish peroxidase detection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After routine deparaffinization with a series of xylene and alcohols, antigen retrieval was performed using 90% formic acid. Slides were then rinsed with distilled H2O and wash buffer. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with H2O2 solution (TA-125-HP, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 min prior to incubation with a rabbit anti-TWEAK monoclonal antibody (ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company, Plano, TX) at 1 : 100 for 60 min at room temperature. The primary antibody signal was developed with Quanto detection reagents and 3,3-diaminobenzidine chromogen as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Virtual slides were produced by scanning the immunohistochemical (IHC) glass slides using the Aperio CS2 digital pathology scanner (Leica Biosystems). Digital quantitative analysis of TWEAK immunoreactivity in cells was performed by an experienced pathologist in a blinded manner with Aperio ImageScope software v220.127.116.1115 (Leica Biosystems) using a customized positive pixel count algorithm. Stain intensity values are provided as a scoring system for each chromophore comprised of staining intensity and extensiveness captured the outcome: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2 moderate; and 3, strong.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
The expression of TWEAK was calculated by the Wilcoxon test, and the purity-adjusted Rho between TWEAK and TIICs was computed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient in TIMER2.0. For the TWEAK IHC staining and the western blot signal quantitation results, statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA and test. values <0.05 were considered significant.
3.1. The Expression of TWEAK Was Decreased in Tumor Area
To explore the expression of TWEAK in LUAD, TIMER2.0 and Oncomine databases were used. From TIMER2.0, TWEAK expression was drownregulated in LUAD than normal tissues (Figure 1(a)). Similar results were obtained in 15/16(93.75%) datasets from Oncomine (Figure 1(b)).
3.2. Lower Level of TWEAK Correlated to Shorter OS
In order to explore the overall survival (OS) of LUAD patients according to TWEAK expression, the TIDE and LCE databases were analyzed. From TIDE, poorer OS was greatly relevant to lower TWEAK in TCGA (, ) (Figure 2(a)) and [email protected] (, ) (Figure 2(b)). Besides, similar outcomes were obtained from the meta-analysis part of LCE ( [95% CI, 0.76-0.92]) (Figure 2(c)).
3.3. TWEAK Was Highly Related to TIICs
To explore the relationship between TWEAK expressive and TIICs, the TIMER2.0 and TIDE databases were explored (Figure 3). It was revealed from the TIMER2.0 that TWEAK was negatively associated with common lymphoid progenitor, MDSC, mast cell resting, and T cell CD4+Th2, while it was positively related to hematopoietic stem cell, granulocyte-monocyte progenitor, cancer-associated fibroblast, cancer-switched memory B cell, common myeloid progenitor, T cell NK, endothelial cell, monocyte, eosinophil, and macrophage/monocyte. Besides, by analyzing in TIDE, CTLs also were positively correlated with TWEAK in TCGA (, ) and [email protected] (, ). Among these TIICs, hematopoietic stem cell, common lymphoid progenitor, and MDSC were the most closed TIICs ().
3.4. The PPI Network of TWEAK
To explore the downstream targets of TWEAK, the STRING database was applied (Figure 4). From STRING analyses, we found that many genes had intertwined relationships with TWEAK, including TNFRSF12A, TNFRSF25, TNFSF13B, TNFSF11, BIRC2, TRAF2, TNF, TNFRSF1B, TNFRSF13C, and CASP8.
3.5. The Expression of TWEAK in LUAD Cell Lines and Tissues
In order to study the expression of TWEAK in LUAD, first, we tested the expression of TWEAK in fresh lung cancer tissues and normal adjacent tissues (See Supplementary Figure S1 for original results). We found that in 6 pairs of samples, TWEAK was strongly positive in 3 pairs of normal lung tissues (Figure 5(a)). Subsequently, we used western blot analysis to detect normal lung epithelial cell lines HBE and NSCLC cell lines A549, H1299, H358, SPCA1, PC9, HCC827, and H1993, among which lung adenocarcinoma cell lines are A549, H1299, SPCA1, and H1993. The results show that the expression of TWEAK in normal lung epithelial cell lines is relatively higher than its expression in lung adenocarcinoma cell lines, but the expression of TWEAK in other nonsmall cell lung cancers (non-LUAD) is higher than that in normal lung epithelial cell lines (Figure 5(b)). At the same time, we found that the TWEAK protein expression of H1299 is higher than that of HBE. Because the characteristic of the H1299 cell line is p53(-), we speculate that the expression of TWEAK may be related to lymphocyte infiltration and lymph node metastasis. However, more research is needed to explain this issue in the future.
Next, we reviewed 40 LUAD pathological specimens and used IHC analysis to detect the expression of TWEAK in the specimens. The clinicopathological characteristics of the LUAD patients are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. There were 26 female and 14 male patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 36-77 years). Histopathologic diagnosis included the following: well differentiated (, 17.5%), moderately differentiated (, 67.5%), and poorly differentiated (, 15%) tumors. Postoperative staging evaluation demonstrated stage I disease in 14 patients, stage II disease in 6 patients, stage III disease in 19 patients, and stage IV disease in 1 patient. We further detect the TWEAK protein expression in LUAD and the correlation with clinicopathological parameters. In the present study, all of the tumor sections were classified as TWEAK-positive as detected by IHC and positive staining was mainly located in the nucleus (Figure 5(c)). In addition, we found that TWEAK stains deeply (+++) in normal lung epithelial cells, while staining is relatively light (+) in LUAD epithelium. Deep staining of nuclei also appeared in the inflammatory cells of LUAD, suggesting that the expression of TWEAK is also related to inflammation . The correlation of TWEAK expression with clinicopathological parameters was then investigated. TWEAK expression was significantly associated with differentiation, pTNM stage, primary tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and tumor location. No significant relationship was noted between TWEAK 19 expression and gender, age, smoking history, and histological type (Table 1).
Lung cancer is still the most severe threat to the population around the world due to its high mortality . LUAD is the majority subtype among lung cancer. Immunotherapy has opened a new field for LUAD treatment because of its comparatively higher tolerance and prolonged effectiveness with possible tumor clearance compared with traditional chemotherapy administration. But the act of immunotherapy somewhat depends on the function of immune cells within tumor itself or around tumor microenvironment.
TWEAK is a type II transmembrane protein, belonging to the member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) ligands. It plays an important role in the development of cancer through multiple ways including TRAF and NFĸB pathways by combining with FN14 , such as inflammation , proliferation and/or apoptosis of cancer cells, angiogenesis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transform (EMT) .
Our study revealed that lower expression of TWEAK was connected with worse prognosis. In TIMER2.0 and Oncomine databases, the results showed the decreased TWEAK expression in LUAD tumors compared to normal tissues. Further investigation based on TIDE and LCE suggested that shorter survival appeared in poorer expression of TWEAK in LUA. Therefore, low TWEAK expression was an inferior prognostic biomarker of LUAD.
Besides, less TWEAK is likely to be related with the infiltrations of TIICs in LUAD. According to the TIDE, the CTL was positively related with TWEAK in TIDE. Furthermore, in TIMER2.0, we found that TWEAK shown up in a subtractive relevance to common lymphoid progenitor, MDSC, mast cell resting, and T cell CD4+ Th2 and in a positive correlation with hematopoietic stem cell, granulocyte-monocyte progenitor, cancer-associated fibroblast, cancer-switched memory B cell, common myeloid progenitor, T cell NK, endothelial cell, monocyte, eosinophil, and macrophage/monocyte, especially hematopoietic stem cell, common lymphoid progenitor, and MDSC.
Existing researches can be used to help decipher our findings of the role of TWEAK. Although TWEAK is upregulated in many tumors, lower TWEAK level was reported in squamous cervical carcinoma , endometrial cancer , NSCLS , and glioblastoma . Furthermore, poor survival with downregulated TWEAK was proved in head and neck cancer and squamous cervical carcinoma [20, 24]. However, it has not been observed that TWEAK had an impact on the survival in NSCLC.
The poor survival of low TWEAK expression patients might connect with various TIICs. Previous studies found that TWEAK tends to be expressed in a variety of immune cell regions (including dendritic cells, circulating NK cells, and resting and activated monocytes ). Many studies have confirmed that TWEAK could induce the death of cancer cells through TWEAK/FN14 pathways, such as apoptosis, necrosis, and indirect cell death [4, 26]. TIICs could also inhibit the survival of cancer cells by surveillance and cytotoxicity  of the immune system via TWEAK. For example, macrophages could induce apoptosis by motivating CD4+T Cell through TWEAK pathways , whereas longtime of immune infiltrating may transform lesions into the status of chronic inflammation  and induce the apoptosis of TIICs themselves , which may arouse an environment of immune escape and failure to immunotherapy . On the other hand, the increased inhibitory TIICs could also contribute to the progression of LUAD patients. For instance, MDSCs help cancer cells escape from the immune system and resistant to immunotherapy . In short, the death of cancer cells which might be derived from TIICs and TWEAK/FN14 could account for the difference of prognosis in LUAD.
In addition, it was discovered that TWEAK is positively related with its receptors (FN14, Figure 6(a), and CD163, Figure 6(b)) in TIMER2.0. However, FN14 could accelerate the progression of cancer without the participant of TWEAK , which is eccentric to the effects of TWEAK in this study. The reported another receptor, CD163, which appeared on the macrophages and monocytes which could promote cell proliferation , was also observed with poor survival in cancer . These erratic phenomena need to be clarified and verified.
Since TWEAK is expressed in many types of solid tumors, it exhibits unprecedented potential clinical application value. A new type of human TWEAK receptor antibody (TweakR, Fn14, TNFRSF12A, and CD266) PDL192 was found to directly inhibit tumor cell growth and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity in a variety of mouse xenograft models, showing strong antitumor effects active . Another TWEAK receptor antibody, RG7212, moved from the laboratory to clinical trials. RG7212 inhibits tumor growth by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and survival signals, enhancing the host’s antitumor immune response, but depends on the positive expression of Fn14 [37–39].
We found from the Kaplan-Meier database that the high expression of TweakR (Fn14) suggested poor OS (, ), but the expression of TWEAK was not significantly correlated with OS in LUAD patients (, ). Lab evidence suggests that low serum levels of TWEAK may be one of the characteristics of NSCLC , and TWEAK/Fn14 induce NSCLC survival rate and treatment response by Mcl-1mediated . Interestingly, among LUAD patients receiving chemotherapy, those with high TWEAK expression levels had poorer OS (, ), suggesting that TWEAK is related to chemotherapy resistance. In the study of ovarian cancer, Fn14 seems to be able to overcome the resistance of chemotherapy drugs  and in gliomas, it is highly expressed in PDX of resistant patients . This seemingly contradictory phenomenon undoubtedly indicates that TWEAK has potentially more unique and unexpected functions.
TWEAK is a type II transmembrane protein, but it can be cleaved by furin to produce soluble cytokines. Therefore, both membrane-anchored and soluble TWEAK can bind to Fn14 [44–46]. TWEAK is a glycoprotein with three parts, including a C-terminal extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and an N-terminal intracellular domain. Fn14 contains an extracellular domain that binds to TWEAK and a cytoplasmic tail necessary for signal transduction [47, 48]. Activation of TWEAK/Fn14 signaling triggers intracellular signaling cascades that include regulation of cell death (apoptosis or necrosis), proliferation, differentiation and migration, triggering of angiogenesis, and induction of inflammatory cytokine expression.
TWEAK/Fn14 signaling pathway is involved in tumor pathogenesis. It plays an important role in the growth, invasion, and migration of tumor cells. Furthermore, TWEAK/Fn14 activation triggers downstream signaling to regulate several key events related to tumor inflammation, angiogenesis, and EMT. Given their high tumor-related expression and multiple roles, TWEAK and Fn14 are considered two attractive targets for tumor therapy. Therefore, many drugs targeting TWEAK or Fn14 have been developed by researchers around the world in recent years (Table 2), and some TWEAK and Fn14 targeting drugs have been tested in preclinical trials and showed effective results. They exert antitumor effects through three pathways: neutralize soluble TWEAK, block Fn14 signaling, and directly kill Fn14-positive tumor cells. In the future, we should focus on basic and translational research on the TWEAK-Fn14 axis, which will be a suitable molecular target for the development of new tumor therapies; at the same time, more preclinical studies are needed to explore the safety of TWEAK/Fn14 in clinical practice effective treatment.
In this study, we found that lower TWEAK was related to poor prognosis and TIICs in LUAD. And decreased TWEAK was correlated with multiple immune cells in the tumor region. Intimate relationship between FN14 and TWEAK indicated that TWEAK/FN14 pathway possibly plays an important role in the survival of LUAD, but the underlying mechanism needs to be further explored.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Zhengxi He and Wang Sai are responsible for the experiments and writing, Jinchun Wu is responsible for data collection and sorting, and Yangchun Xie is responsible for proofreading. Zhengxi He and Bin Li are both the corresponding authors. Zhengxi He and Sai Wang, contributed equally to this work and co-First authors.
This work was supported by the Project 2021JJ31069 and 2020JJ5898 supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (for Youths) which supports Xiangya Hospital.
Figure S1: the original data of TWEAK and GAPDH expression in (A, B) normal lung epithelium tissue (C, D) and normal lung epithelium cell line and LUAD cell line (detected by WB). Table S1: characteristics of LUAD patients. (Supplementary Materials)
X. Wang, S. Xiao, and Y. Xia, “Tumor necrosis factor receptor mediates fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 signaling,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 579–588, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Hu, W. Zeng, and Y. Xia, “TWEAK/Fn14 signaling in tumors,” Tumour Biology, vol. 39, no. 6, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, W. Zeng, and Y. Xia, “TWEAK/Fn14 axis is an important player in fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 236, no. 5, pp. 3304–3316, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kaduka, K. Takeda, M. Nakayama, K. Kinoshita, H. Yagita, and K. Okumura, “TWEAK mediates anti-tumor effect of tumor-infiltrating macrophage,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 384–390, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, S. Wu, Y. Yang, M. Zhao, G. Zhu, and Z. Hou, “The prognostic landscape of tumor-infiltrating immune cell and immunomodulators in lung cancer,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 95, pp. 55–61, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Maecker, E. Varfolomeev, F. Kischkel et al., “TWEAK attenuates the transition from innate to adaptive immunity,” Cell, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 931–944, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ye, M. I. Fox, N. A. Belmar et al., “Enavatuzumab, a humanized anti-tweak receptor monoclonal antibody, exerts antitumor activity through attracting and activating innate immune effector cells,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2017, Article ID 5737159, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yin, L. Luistro, H. Zhong et al., “RG7212 anti-TWEAK mAb inhibits tumor growth through inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and survival signaling and by enhancing the host antitumor immune response,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 5686–5698, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, J. Fan, B. Wang et al., “TIMER: a web server for comprehensive analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 21, pp. e108–e110, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Li, E. Severson, J. C. Pignon et al., “Comprehensive analyses of tumor immunity: implications for cancer immunotherapy,” Genome Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 174, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, J. Fu, Z. Zeng et al., “TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 48, no. W1, pp. W509–W514, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Rhodes, S. Kalyana-Sundaram, V. Mahavisno et al., “Oncomine 3.0: genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles,” Neoplasia, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 166–180, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Jiang, S. Gu, D. Pan et al., “Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response,” Nature Medicine, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1550–1558, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Cai, S. Lin, L. Girard et al., “LCE: an open web portal to explore gene expression and clinical associations in lung cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 2551–2564, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Szklarczyk, A. L. Gable, D. Lyon et al., “STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D607–D613, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sidler, P. Wu, R. Herro et al., “TWEAK mediates inflammation in experimental atopic dermatitis and psoriasis,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, article 15395, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
M. Bhattacharjee, R. Raju, A. Radhakrishnan et al., “A bioinformatics resource for TWEAK-Fn14 signaling pathway,” Journal of Signal Transduction, vol. 2012, Article ID 376470, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Itoigawa, N. Harada, S. Harada et al., “TWEAK enhances TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human bronchial epithelial cells,” Respiratory Research, vol. 16, no. 1, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zou, D. Wang, X. Gan et al., “Low TWEAK expression is correlated to the progression of squamous cervical carcinoma,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 123–128, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wang, J. N. T. Fung, Y. Tuo, L. Hu, and C. Chen, “TWEAK/Fn14 promotes apoptosis of human endometrial cancer cells via caspase pathway,” Cancer Letters, vol. 294, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Chang, M. C. Yen, J. Y. HuNg et al., “Investigation of the role of tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 573–581, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. L. Tran, W. S. McDonough, P. J. Donohue et al., “The human Fn14 receptor gene is up-regulated in migrating glioma cells in vitro and overexpressed in advanced glial tumors,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1313–1321, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. X. Avilés-Jurado, X. Terra, D. Gómez et al., “Low blood levels of sTWEAK are related to locoregional failure in head and neck cancer,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 272, no. 7, pp. 1733–1741, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Qi, M. Lei, L. Qin, M. Xie, D. Zhao, and J. Wang, “Endogenous TWEAK is critical for regulating the function of mouse uterine natural killer cells in an immunological model of pregnancy loss,” Immunology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 70–82, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ikner and A. Ashkenazi, “TWEAK induces apoptosis through a death-signaling complex comprising receptor- interacting protein 1 (RIP1), Fas-associated death domain (FADD), and caspase-8,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 24, pp. 21546–21554, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Petitbarat, M. Rahmati, V. Sérazin et al., “TWEAK appears as a modulator of endometrial IL-18 related cytotoxic activity of uterine natural killers,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 1, article e14497, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Kaplan, D. Ray, R. R. Mo, R. L. Yung, and B. C. Richardson, “TRAIL (Apo2 ligand) and TWEAK (Apo3 ligand) mediate CD4+T cell killing of antigen-presenting macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 2897–2904, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Son, T. Oshio, Y. I. Kawamura et al., “TWEAK/Fn14 pathway promotes a T helper 2-type chronic colitis with fibrosis in mice,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1131–1142, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhu, P. F. Petit, and B. J. Van Den Eynde, “Apoptosis of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes: a new immune checkpoint mechanism,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 835–847, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Gun, S. W. L. Lee, J. L. Sieow, and S. C. Wong, “Targeting immune cells for cancer therapy,” Redox Biology, vol. 25, article 101174, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Tesi, “MDSC; the most important cell you have never heard of,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 4–7, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, F. Liu, C. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Tang, and Z. Jiang, “Src promotes metastasis of human non-small cell lung cancer cells through Fn14-mediated NF-κB signaling,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 1282–1294, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Akahori, V. Karmali, R. Polavarapu et al., “CD163 interacts with TWEAK to regulate tissue regeneration after ischaemic injury,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7792, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yang, F. Wang, L. Wang et al., “CD163+ tumor-associated macrophage is a prognostic biomarker and is associated with therapeutic effect on malignant pleural effusion of lung cancer patients,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 10592–10603, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Michaelson and L. Burkly, “Therapeutic targeting of TWEAK/Fn14 in cancer: exploiting the intrinsic tumor cell killing capacity of the pathway,” Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol. 49, pp. 145–160, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. G. Whitsett, S. P. Fortin Ensign, and H. D. Dhruv, “FN14 expression correlates with MET in NSCLC and promotes MET-driven cell invasion,” Clinical & experimental metastasis, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 613–623, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
D. Meulendijks, U. N. Lassen, L. L. Siu et al., “Exposure and tumor Fn14 expression as determinants of pharmacodynamics of the anti-TWEAK monoclonal antibody RG7212 in patients with Fn14-positive solid tumors,” Clinical Cancer Research : an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 858–867, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. N. Lassen, D. Meulendijks, L. L. Siu et al., “A phase I monotherapy study of RG7212, a first-in-class monoclonal antibody targeting TWEAK signaling in patients with advanced cancers,” Clinical Cancer Research : an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 258–266, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Cheng, T. G. Whitsett, N. L. Tran, and J. A. Winkles, “The TWEAK receptor Fn14 is an Src-inducible protein and a positive regulator of Src-driven cell invasion,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 575–583, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. G. Whitsett, I. T. Mathews, M. H. Cardone et al., “Mcl-1 mediates TWEAK/Fn14-induced non-small cell lung cancer survival and therapeutic response,” Molecular Cancer Research : MCR, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 550–559, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Y. Wu, L. Y. Gu, W. Cang et al., “Fn14 overcomes cisplatin resistance of high-grade serous ovarian cancer by promoting Mdm2-mediated p53-R248Q ubiquitination and degradation,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 176, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Hersh, B. G. Harder, A. Roos et al., “The TNF receptor family member Fn14 is highly expressed in recurrent glioblastoma and in GBM patient-derived xenografts with acquired temozolomide resistance,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1321–1330, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bossen, K. Ingold, A. Tardivel et al., “Interactions of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor family members in the mouse and human,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 20, pp. 13964–13971, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Brown, A. Ghosh, and J. A. Winkles, “Full-length, membrane-anchored TWEAK can function as a juxtacrine signaling molecule and activate the NF-κB pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 23, pp. 17432–17441, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Roos, A. Wicovsky, N. Müller et al., “Soluble and transmembrane TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis differentially activate the classical and noncanonical NF-κB pathway,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 1593–1605, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Winkles, N. L. Tran, S. A. Brown, N. Stains, H. E. Cunliffe, and M. E. Berens, “Role of TWEAK and Fn14 in tumor biology,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2761–2771, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Tajrishi, T. S. Zheng, L. C. Burkly, and A. Kumar, “The TWEAK-Fn14 pathway: a potent regulator of skeletal muscle biology in health and disease,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 215–225, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Dong, L. Yang, and P. Li, “Quercetin inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of human non-small cell lung cancer cell line: the key role of Src-mediated fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14)/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway,” Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, vol. 26, Article ID e920537, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
N. Wisniacki, L. Amaravadi, G. R. Galluppi et al., “Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of anti-TWEAK monoclonal antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical therapeutics, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1137–1149, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
W D. Xu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Liu, “Role of the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway in autoimmune diseases,” Immunologic Research, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
A. Aronin, S. Amsili, T. B. Prigozhina et al., “Fn14Trail effectively inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, article e77050, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Michaelson, R. Kelly, L. Yang, X. Zhang, K. Wortham, and I. B. Joseph, “The anti-Fn14 antibody BIIB036 inhibits tumor growth in xenografts and patient derived primary tumor models and enhances efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents in multiple xenograft models,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 812–821, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Michaelson, A. Amatucci, R. Kelly et al., “Development of an Fn14 agonistic antibody as an anti-tumor agent,” MAbs, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 362–375, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Trebing, I. Lang, M. Chopra et al., “A novel llama antibody targeting Fn14 exhibits anti-metastatic activity in vivo,” MAbs, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 297–308, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. de Plater, A. Vincent-Salomon, F. Berger et al., “Predictive gene signature of response to the anti-TweakR mAb PDL192 in patient-derived breast cancer xenografts,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, article e104227, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhou, S. Ekmekcioglu, J. W. Marks et al., “The TWEAK receptor Fn14 is a therapeutic target in melanoma: immunotoxins targeting Fn14 receptor for malignant melanoma treatment,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 1052–1062, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhou, W. N. Hittelman, H. Yagita et al., “Antitumor activity of a humanized, bivalent immunotoxin targeting Fn14-positive solid tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 14, pp. 4439–4450, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhou, J. W. Marks, W. N. Hittelman et al., “Development and characterization of a potent immunoconjugate targeting the Fn14 receptor on solid tumor cells,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1276–1288, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhou, K. A. Mohamedali, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo et al., “Development of human serine protease-based therapeutics targeting Fn14 and identification of Fn14 as a new target overexpressed in TNBC,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2688–2705, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
C. S. Schneider, J. G. Perez, E. Cheng et al., “Minimizing the non-specific binding of nanoparticles to the brain enables active targeting of Fn14-positive glioblastoma cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 42, pp. 42–51, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar