Dermatology Research and Practice

Dermatology Research and Practice / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 272376 |

Vikram K. Mahajan, "Sporotrichosis: An Overview and Therapeutic Options", Dermatology Research and Practice, vol. 2014, Article ID 272376, 13 pages, 2014.

Sporotrichosis: An Overview and Therapeutic Options

Academic Editor: Craig G. Burkhart
Received30 Jul 2014
Accepted12 Dec 2014
Published29 Dec 2014


Sporotrichosis is a chronic granulomatous mycotic infection caused by Sporothrix schenckii, a common saprophyte of soil, decaying wood, hay, and sphagnum moss, that is endemic in tropical/subtropical areas. The recent phylogenetic studies have delineated the geographic distribution of multiple distinct Sporothrix species causing sporotrichosis. It characteristically involves the skin and subcutaneous tissue following traumatic inoculation of the pathogen. After a variable incubation period, progressively enlarging papulo-nodule at the inoculation site develops that may ulcerate (fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis) or multiple nodules appear proximally along lymphatics (lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis). Osteoarticular sporotrichosis or primary pulmonary sporotrichosis are rare and occur from direct inoculation or inhalation of conidia, respectively. Disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis or involvement of multiple visceral organs, particularly the central nervous system, occurs most commonly in persons with immunosuppression. Saturated solution of potassium iodide remains a first line treatment choice for uncomplicated cutaneous sporotrichosis in resource poor countries but itraconazole is currently used/recommended for the treatment of all forms of sporotrichosis. Terbinafine has been observed to be effective in the treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis. Amphotericin B is used initially for the treatment of severe, systemic disease, during pregnancy and in immunosuppressed patients until recovery, then followed by itraconazole for the rest of the therapy.

1. Introduction

Deep mycoses involving the skin and/or subcutaneous tissue (subcutaneous mycoses), fascial planes and bones, and/or various organs systems (deep mycoses) account for almost 1% of the total mycoses cases. In most instances of subcutaneous mycoses, infection occurs following traumatic implantation of the etiologic fungi that are saprophytes to the soil and plant detritus. Although once considered endemic in tropical countries, these opportunistic infections are being increasingly observed across populations following accidental exposure to pathogen especially among returning travelers/workers. Current era of immunosuppression due to HIV infection, immunosuppressive therapy for cancers, autoimmune diseases, or organ transplantation has further contributed towards their increased prevalence. While chromoblastomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis, mycetomas, subcutaneous zygomycosis (entomophthoromycosis and mucormycosis), hyalohyphomycosis, and lobomycosis have limited area-specific presence, sporotrichosis, a subcutaneous mycotic infection from Sporothrix schenckii species complex, perhaps remains the most reported subcutaneous mycosis worldwide. The heterogeneous morphology of lesions (nodules, plaques, noduloulcerative, ulcerative, nodulocystic or warty lesions, discharging sinuses, and subcutaneous swellings or masses) often makes the clinical diagnosis difficult particularly in nonendemic areas leading to delayed treatment and protracted clinical course causing significant morbidity and impact on public health. In majority, treatment becomes imperative as spontaneous resolution occurs as an exception [1]. Extracutaneous sporotrichosis is also an emerging mycosis in HIV infected patients [2, 3]. This paper presents an overview of sporotrichosis and therapeutic options.

2. Epidemiology

This chronic granulomatous subcutaneous mycotic infection is caused by Sporothrix schenckii species complex, a common saprophyte of soil, decaying wood, hay, and sphagnum moss. Recent molecular studies have demonstrated that S. schenckii is a complex of at least six clinicoepidemiologically important species with significant differences in geographical distribution, biochemical properties (dextrose, sucrose, and raffinose assimilation), degree of virulence, different disease patterns, and response to therapy. These include S. albicans, S. brasiliensis (in Brazil), S. mexicana (in Mexico), S. globosa (in UK, Spain, Italy, China, Japan, USA, and India), and S. schenckii sensu stricto [49]. Hence, the nomenclature “Sporothrix schenckii species complex” is preferred to earlier “Sporothrix schenckii” that was used to describe the strains from all over the world. According to Marimon et al. [7] human infections are mainly associated with S. schenckii sensu stricto, Sporothrix brasiliensis, and Sporothrix globosa while Sporothrix mexicana have only been identified among isolates of environmental origin with occasional exception [8, 10]. Henceforth, the nomenclature “Sporothrix schenckii” is used to represent the “Sporothrix schenckii species complex.”

Sporotrichosis occurs worldwide with focal areas of hyperendemicity. It is particularly common in tropical/subtropical areas and temperate zones with warm and humid climate favoring the growth of saprophytic fungus but large outbreaks have occurred in other parts as well [11, 12]. Its worldwide incidence is unknown but Japan, China, Australia, Central and South America (Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru), and India (along the Sub-Himalayan region) account for most frequent occurrences [1316]. Approximately, one case occur per 1000 people in Peru and in US 200–250 cases (1-2 cases per million) occur annually.

No age, gender, or race is spared of this infection as its occurrence depends upon the fungus in the environment and the portal of entry. The preponderance of males in most reported cases is attributed to their higher exposure risk than gender susceptibility. The traumatic inoculation is the obvious reason that exposed body parts, the extremities in particular, are involved most frequently; the upper limbs are affected twice as commonly as the lower limbs and involvement is infrequent [14, 17, 18].

The disease is almost endemic in rural areas and professionals handling plants or plant material such as farmers, gardeners, florists, foresters, and nursery workers are particularly at higher risk. The majority of these patients are between 20 and 50 years of age; the most active years of life when the individual is probably exposed maximally to injuries [14]. S. schenckii gains entry into the skin by traumatic implantation from contaminated thorns, hay stalks, barbs, soil, splinters, and bizarre/roadside injuries leading to cutaneous infection [14]. However, only 10–62% of patients recall any history of trauma as it is usually innocuous, occurs few weeks earlier, and is mostly forgotten [1, 14]. Although animals are not significant source of infection in humans, zoonotic transmission has been reported from insect bites, fish handling, and bites of cats, birds, dogs, rats, reptiles, and horses [19, 20]. Cats have been found to be important vehicle in dissemination of S. schenckii in a long-lasting epidemic of sporotrichosis in Brazil diagnosed by isolation of S. schenckii (S. brasiliensis in 97% isolates) from different types of samples, both from humans and from feline, indicating the emergence of another set of at-risk personnel [2024]. Human-to-human spread, mostly from wound contamination from infected dressings or indigenous/herbal topical medication, interestingly remains underestimated [14, 25].

3. Clinical Presentations

Its exact incubation period remains unknown and may range from a few days to a few months, the average being 3 weeks [26]. The skin and the surrounding lymphatics are involved primarily leading to development of a small, indurated, progressively enlarging papulo-nodule at the inoculation site that may ulcerate (sporotrichotic chancre) without causing systemic symptoms. It may remain as such, or develops multiple lesions. Thereafter, sporotrichosis is presented in three main clinical types: lymphocutaneous, fixed cutaneous, and multifocal or disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis. Extracutaneous or systemic sporotrichosis occurs from hematogenous spread from the primary inoculation site, the lymph node, or more usually from pulmonary disease in immunosuppressed patients. In children clinical profile is almost similar but facial involvement is more frequent accounting for 40–60% or as high 97% in some series [13, 17, 27]. It is also interesting to know that Brazilian isolates present a distinct clinical picture with immune manifestations (erythema multiforme), disseminated cutaneous lesions, and atypical forms [28, 29]. Such a varied disease spectrum has been attributed to factors like the mode of inoculation, the size and depth of the traumatic inoculum, the host immunity (fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis is considered to occur in patients with certain immunity against the fungus), and the virulence and thermotolerance of the fungus (the strains growing best at 35°C purportedly cause fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis and strains that grow both at 35°C and 37°C have been implicated for lymphocutaneous and extracutaneous disease) [12, 15, 30, 31]. However, the concept of thermosensitive strains of S. schenckii causing different clinical forms of the disease remains unsubstantiated [32]. Similarly, whether climate influences predominance of one or the other form also needs validation [33, 34].

3.1. Lymphocutaneous Sporotrichosis

It is the most common variety and accounts for 70–80% of the cases of cutaneous sporotrichosis [15, 35]. The extremities are affected most frequently. A noduloulcerative lesion (sporotrichotic chancre) at inoculation site and a string of similar nodules along the proximal lymphatics, with or without transient satellite adenopathy, characterizes this form (Figure 1). These secondary lesions appearing along lymphatics have varied morphology of erythematous papules, nodules, or plaques, having smooth or warty surface, and may soften and ulcerate discharging seropurulent material. They are mostly asymptomatic, may itch or become painful, and have indolent clinical course similar to that of the primary lesions.

3.2. Fixed Cutaneous Sporotrichosis

It occurs less commonly and is characterized by localized lesions at the inoculation site (Figure 2). Facial involvement occurs more frequently in fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis than in lymphocutaneous variety. The lesions are asymptomatic, erythematous, papules, papulopustules, nodules, or verrucous plaques and occasionally nonhealing ulcers or small abscesses. The lesions may resemble keratoacanthoma, facial cellulitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, prurigo nodularis, soft tissue sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, erysipeloid, or rosacea [14, 36, 37]. This form is considered to occur usually among hosts having high resistance wherein minimal lesions may subside spontaneously or persist exceptionally if not treated, and responds better to treatment [15, 38].

3.3. Multifocal or Disseminated Cutaneous Sporotrichosis

This rarely described variety means ≥3 lesions involving 2 different anatomical sites implies cutaneous dissemination following multiple traumatic implantations of the fungus or rarely from hematogenous spread in individuals apparently having no predisposing factors for immunosuppression [15, 39, 40].

3.4. Extracutaneous Sporotrichosis

This form of the disease usually occurs in the setting of immunosuppression as from alcoholism, diabetes, AIDS, underlying malignancy, use of corticosteroids, or other immunosuppressive drugs [1, 41, 42]. Although sinusitis, pulmonary, ocular or central nervous system disease, meningitis, and endophthalmitis are the usual manifestations, osteoarticular sporotrichosis remains the most common systemic manifestation both in immunocompetent and in immunocompromised individuals that is often confused with other chronic inflammatory arthritis until destruction of adjacent bones or draining sinuses develop [14, 4345]. Cutaneous lesions are uncommon in osteoarticular sporotrichosis and it usually begins as monoarticular disease without systemic illness. The pain is usually less severe than the bacterial arthritis but functional impairment may become severe in untreated cases. Sporotrichotic osteoarthritis usually affects knee, wrist, elbow, and ankle joints in order of frequency manifesting initially with tenosynovitis, joint effusion, bursitis, and synovial cyst formation [44]. Extensive destructive changes often occur in the affected joints because of delayed diagnosis that is very common owing to lack of clinical suspicion. Radiographs of involved joint usually show soft tissue swelling and osteoporosis of contiguous bones or show no abnormality. Parasynovial swelling, subchondral erosions, and narrowing of joint space are uncommon.

Pulmonary disease from inhalation of conidia is rare and characterized by cough, low-grade fever, weight loss, mediastinal lymphadenitis, cavitation mimicking tuberculosis, fibrosis, and rarely massive hemoptysis [46, 47]. Apical lesions resembling pulmonary tuberculosis may occur in 85% of these cases [1]. Most patients usually have underlying severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and may present with subacute/chronic pneumonia. Involvement of central nervous system/meningeal in immunocompromised patients usually has subtle changes in mental status as the only symptom.

4. Diagnosis

Clinical suspicion is the key for early diagnosis and cutaneous lesions need to be differentiated from cutaneous tuberculosis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, nocardiosis, chromoblastomycosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, and atypical mycobacteriosis [15, 16, 48]. Ulcerating lesions can mimic pyoderma gangrenosum [49].

Direct smear examination of pus or biopsy specimen for causative fungus is not diagnostic because of paucity of fungal cells. Fine needle aspiration cytology from a lesion, particularly in extracutaneous or disseminated forms, may occasionally show epithelioid cell granuloma, asteroid bodies, and/or yeast cells and cigar shaped bodies when stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) or Gomori-methenamine silver (GMS) stains [1, 14, 50]. Civila et al. [51] could demonstrate asteroid bodies of S. schenckii in almost 86% cases comprising 36 patients of lymphocutaneous and 6 patients of fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis; nearly 95% of these cases also yielded positive cultures. However, the sensitivity/specificity of direct microscopic examination of tissue sample remains understudied as most researchers consider it unhelpful diagnostic tool due to paucity of fungal cells. The culture of S. schenckii in artificial media remains gold standard in diagnosis. The animal inoculation studies are usually not needed for diagnosis.

4.1. Histopathology

Histopathology is usually nonspecific and mimics other granulomatous diseases (deep fungal infections, cutaneous tuberculosis, leprosy, sarcoidosis, and foreign body granulomas). The histologic features varies from acute on chronic inflammation with characteristic zonation to chronic epithelioid cell granuloma with foreign body or Langhans’ giant cells at both ends and nonspecific chronic granulomatous inflammatory cell infiltration of the dermis in the middle of the spectrum [14]. The major histopathologic features of fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis include central ulceration of epidermis, hyperkeratosis at the edge, acanthosis, and epidermal hyperplasia that may vary to the extent of pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. Neutrophilic abscesses may be seen in the dermis and/or epidermis. There is usually dense cellular infiltrate comprising lymphocytes plasma cells and variable number of epithelioid histiocytes, giant cells, and eosinophils (mixed granulomatous cellular infiltrate) in upper- and middermis with or without fibrocapillary proliferation [52, 53]. Nodules of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis characteristically show 3 concentric zones; the central necrotic zone contains amorphous debris and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (zone of chronic suppuration); the middle tuberculoid zone is composed of epithelioid cells, giant cells (predominantly Langhans’ type), and the outer zone comprising numerous plasma cells, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts with prominent capillary hyperplasia and proliferation (syphiloid zone) [14, 52]. However, this zonation becomes indistinct in older lesions. The fungal elements, when present, are visualized within these zones in PAS or GMS stained histologic sections. They appear globose, budding yeast-like cells measuring 3–8 μm in diameter (in 84% cases), cigar shaped cells sized 1-2 × 4-5 μm (in 33% cases) or oval to round or single budding forms of the yeast within the cytoplasm of giant cells or in the centre of asteroid bodies [1, 17, 54]. Asteroid bodies, sized 15–35 μm in diameter, are usually seen in 40–85% of chronic sporotrichosis cases as extracellular and within the abscesses [1, 16, 17, 54]. Although observed more frequently in the lymphocutaneous variety, they do not differ morphologically from those seen in fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis. Their demonstration by direct immunofluorescence and specific immunohistochemical techniques is considered more sensitive and specific [55, 56]. Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon, wherein one of the several fungal elements enveloped by an eosinophilic material radiating centrifugally in a sunburst fashion with its central portion reacting immunohistochemically with an anti-Sporothrix schenckii antibody, perhaps represents an immunologic interaction between the host and the pathogen [5052]. However, the presence of asteroid bodies or Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon is not pathognomonic and may be observed often in other granulomatous and/or infectious diseases as well; at best, they can aid in the diagnosis [51].

4.2. Culture and Identification of Causative Fungus

The various Sporothrix species appear similar in morphology, but only S. schenckii is pathogenic to humans. S. schenckii can be grown from skin biopsy or other clinical samples (sputum, pus, synovial fluid/biopsy, bone drainage/biopsy, and cerebrospinal fluid) on Sabouraud’s glucose agar (SDA), brain heart infusion agar, or Mycosel at 25°C and the growth is visible in 3–5 days to 2 weeks [1]. Incubation of cultures at 37°C in blood glucose-cysteine agar or brain-heart infusion broth will produce its yeast form. The initial cream-colored colonies grown on SDA at 25°C are smooth and moist but turn brown/black after a few weeks due to melanin production that protects it from phagocytosis and killing by human monocytes and macrophages and extracellular proteinases (Figure 3) [57].

Microscopically, in lactophenol cotton blue mounts, S. schenckii appears as delicate branching septate hyphae with slender, short, conidiophores with tapering tips and surrounding pyriform conidia in a flower-like arrangement or as individual thick-walled, dark brown conidia attached directly to the hypha often in dense sleeve-like pattern (Figure 4(a)). In practice, S. schenckii is usually identified by its characteristic colony morphology, microscopic appearance and temperature dimorphism that is, its ability to exist as a mold at 25°C (room temperature) and as yeast at 37°C (in host tissues) (Figure 4(b)) [1, 58].

4.3. Intradermal Testing, Molecular and Other Diagnostic Techniques

The diagnostic value of all these tests is not reliable for diagnosis of sporotrichosis in view of significant variations in their specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, these tests remain to be of limited value in view of their unavailability for routine diagnostic use. Nevertheless, they are useful to raise a diagnostic suspicion prompting more aggressive diagnostic workup.

The diagnostic significance of intradermal tests to detect delayed hypersensitivity using sporotrichin or peptide-rhamnomannan (PRM) antigen remains ambiguous. They are negative in severe or disseminated sporotrichosis cases and are often positive in cured patients or in healthy people living in endemic areas [14, 15].

Analysis of antibody responses by immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), agglutination, compliment-fixation tests, immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence, immunodiffusion, and immunoelectrophoresis techniques and detection of S. schenckii by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of calmodulin gene are useful in diagnosing rarer extracutaneous and disseminated forms [15, 5961]. For instance, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibody titers higher than serum antibody titers may be indicative of sporotrichotic meningitis. The ELISA has a reported sensitivity of 90% with 86% overall efficacy when tested against sera obtained from patients with any form of sporotrichosis [62]. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of mitochondrial DNA is reportedly useful for identification, taxonomy, typing, and epidemiology of S. Schenckii [63]. Serological testing using antigenic fraction of the S. schenckii that binds concanavalin-A represents a more recent diagnostic tool [64].

4.4. Imaging Studies

Routine radio-imaging studies are usually not needed for the diagnosis of sporotrichosis unless specific systemic involvement is suspected. For instance, conventional X-rays or CT scan for the chest (pulmonary sporotrichosis) or other involved areas (osteoarticular sporotrichosis) will be supportive in the management but not specifically diagnostic of sporotrichosis.

5. Treatment Options

Spontaneous resolution is extremely rare and majority of the patients will require treatment. There are no well-controlled studies for the treatment of sporotrichosis and various treatment schedules recommended by Infectious Diseases Society of America are empirical and primarily based on case reports, retrospective reviews, and nonrandomized trials (Table 1) [65]. Low cost, ease of administration, safety profile, and the site of infection (localized or disseminated) often dictate the choice of therapy. Severe and systemic infection will require treatment that is more aggressive despite concern for drug-associated toxicities. Resolution of active infection and eradication of S. Schenckii from tissues remain the desired outcome of all treatments. The duration of 3–6 months for treatment of sporotrichosis remains arbitrary but any treatment must be continued for at least a period of 4 to 6 weeks after complete clinical remission to achieve mycological cure. Although treatment is prolonged and expensive, complete recovery without scarring is expected in cutaneous sporotrichosis following appropriate therapy. However, compromised pulmonary functions in pulmonary disease, severe disability from chronic osteoarticular sporotrichosis, or occasional scarring may result [36, 47, 66]. Patients with immunosuppression usually require life-long suppressive therapy.

Sr. number Clinical manifestationsPreferred treatment [dose] Alternative treatmentRemarks

1Uncomplicated cutaneous sporotrichosisItraconazole [200 mg/day]Itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.] or terbinafine [500 mg b.i.d.] or SSKI [increasing doses] or fluconazole [400–800 mg/day] or local hyperthermiaTreatment for 2–4 weeks after lesions have resolved

2Osteoarticular sporotrichosisItraconazole [200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)]Liposomal amphotericin B (3–5 mg/kg/day) or deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day] until resolutionSwitching to itraconazole after resolution and treatment for a total of 12 months

3Pulmonary sporotrichosisLiposomal amphotericin B [3–5 mg/kg/day] and then itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day] until recovery and then itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Treating less severe disease with itraconazole. Treatment for at least 12 months

4Meningeal sporotrichosisLiposomal Amphotericin B [3–5 mg/kg/day] and then itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day] until recovery and then itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Length of therapy with amphotericin B is not established. Treatment for 4–6 weeks and total of 12 months. Suppressive therapy with itraconazole is needed

5Disseminated sporotrichosisLiposomal amphotericin B [3–5 mg/kg/day] and then itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day] until recovery and then Itraconazole [200 mg b.i.d.]Treatment with amphotericin B until objective improvement and for at least 12 months. Suppressive therapy with itraconazole is needed

6Sporotrichosis in pregnant women Treating only severe sporotrichosis with liposomal amphotericin B [3–5 mg/kg/day] or deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day].
Treatment with local hyperthermia [approx. 45°C] for uncomplicated cutaneous sporotrichosis
Preferably, defer treatment for uncomplicated cases

7Sporotrichosis in childrenItraconazole [6–10 mg/kg/d or maximum of 400 mg/day] for mild disease, deoxycholate amphotericin B [0.7–1 mg/kg/day] for severe diseaseSSKI with increasing doses equivalent to half the adult dose for a duration as in adultsTreating severe disease with an amphotericin B formulation

Modified after Kauffman et al. [65].

Until recently and before the availability/approval of itraconazole, saturated solution of potassium iodide had been the standard treatment since the time it was introduced in 19th century and yet remains a first choice to treat uncomplicated disease in resource poor countries.

5.1. Saturated Solution of Potassium Iodide

Saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) administered orally remains the low cost, first choice of the treatment for uncomplicated cutaneous sporotrichosis especially when high cost of itraconazole is precluding. However, it is not effective in extracutaneous form of sporotrichosis. The exact mechanism of its action against S. Schenckii remains poorly elucidated. Possibly, it inhibits granuloma formation through some immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms thereby exposing the fungus to the host defenses or other antifungal agents used concurrently [67]. However, it does not appear to increase monocyte or neutrophil killing of S. Schenckii. Interestingly, S. Schenckii can grow when plated with 10% SSKI suggesting that it has no fungistatic or fungicidal activity. It has been suggested that it gets converted to iodine in-vivo by myeloperoxidase, a hydrogen peroxide system of polymorphonuclear cells, and exerts its cidal effect as has been demonstrated from its inhibitory effect on germination of cells and their direct destruction on ultrastructure examination of S. Schenckii exposed to iodine-potassium-iodine solution [68].

SSKI is the most extensively used mode of treatment in both fixed cutaneous and lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis across countries especially from developing world where most cases occur and that too is without specific treatment trials. Failure of therapy unrelated to compliance is reported exceptionally [69, 70] and most reports delineate its efficacy to an extent that a favorable therapeutic response is considered nearly diagnostic in the absence of mycologic support [1, 13, 14, 17, 18, 39, 58, 71, 72]. It has been found effective even in cases not responding to itraconazole [73, 74]. However, no specific recommendations/guidelines or treatment schedules are available. SSKI, containing 1 g/mL of potassium iodide, is usually prescribed in a starting dose of 5 drops (using a standard eye dropper) three times a day (t.i.d.), taken orally mixed with fruit juice or milk to mask its unpalatable taste. The dose is increased daily by 5 drops t.i.d. up to a maximum dose of 30 to 40 drops t.i.d. until complete healing. The response becomes evident within 2 weeks and healing occurs in 4–32 weeks [14, 72]. However, this schedule remains incomprehensive particularly for patients working outdoors for long hours resulting in poor compliance. Cabezas et al. [75] compared the safety and efficacy of once-daily versus 3-times daily dosing in a randomized nonblinded clinical trial on 57 pediatric patients with culture confirmed fixed cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. The starting dose of SSKI 150 mg/day was increased to maximum of 160 mg/day in both groups. Although, adverse events were higher (61% versus 42%) with once-daily dose, the cure rates were comparable in both groups.

Adverse effects such as metallic taste, flu-like syndrome, excessive lacrimation, gastrointestinal upsets, parotid swelling, acneiform or papulopustular eruptions, exacerbation of dermatitis herpetiformis, and lesional pain and inflammation in rare instances may lead to noncompliance in as high as 60% cases but rarely need discontinuation of treatment [13, 15, 17, 39]. Metallic taste signifies threshold of maximum tolerable dose and the dosage is adjusted at a lower level. Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, iododerma, cardiac irritability, vasculitis, pustular psoriasis, pulmonary edema, urticaria and angioedema, myalgia, lymphadenopathy, and eosinophilia are some potential adverse reactions [14, 76]. Hypothyroidism associated with SSKI therapy is usually precipitated in patients already having defective (partial) autoregulation mechanism (as from Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, surgery, or radioactive iodide therapy for Graves’ disease) that maintains thyroid hormone synthesis. Thyroid gland stops producing thyroid hormone by negative feedback mechanism when excess quantities of iodine exist (Wolff-Chaikoff effect). Inbuilt autoregulation mechanism maintains a storage pool of organic iodine in the thyroid gland and ensures that it produces enough thyroid hormone for the patient to remain euthyroid (escape phenomenon) [76]. In the complete absence of autoregulation mechanism (as in patients from areas of iodine deficiency having long-standing goiter) due to presence of autonomous thyroid foci the thyroid synthesizes excess thyroid hormone leading to thyrotoxicosis (Jod-Basedow disease). However, unless preexisting thyroid disease is suspected baseline thyroid function studies are not required as the therapeutic effect usually occurs in few weeks and within the period of “escape phenomenon.” Discontinuation of SSKI will usually restore normal thyroid functioning within a month in case of iatrogenic hypothyroidism. Patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, potassium-sparing diuretics, or with renal impairment may develop potassium toxicity and need careful monitoring during SSKI therapy. SSKI is currently pregnancy category D drug. Therapy with SSKI should not be reinstituted in patients developing “flu-like syndrome”/hypersensitivity to SSKI as they will suffer adverse reactions even at low doses.

5.2. Azoles (Itraconazole, Fluconazole, and Ketoconazole)

All azoles inhibit cytochrome P450 enzyme system and concomitant administration of drugs metabolized by this enzyme system (digoxin, warfarin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbitone, rifampicin, cisapride, astemizole, triazolam, midazolam, lovastatin/simvastatin, H-2 antagonists, and oral hypoglycemic agents) remains contraindicated because of potential serious toxicities. They are also contraindicated in pregnancy and hypersensitivity to azoles.

Itraconazole, the oral antifungal agent from azoles, in a dose of 100–200 mg daily is effective and well-tolerated and has largely replaced SSKI and amphotericin B with its 90–100% efficacy rates in cutaneous as well as extracutaneous sporotrichosis [77]. It inhibits enzyme cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14α-demethylase that converts lanosterol to ergosterol, the main sterol in fungal cell wall. Its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.1–1.0 mg/L for the yeast form is well achieved with the recommended therapeutic doses and has concentration in stratum corneum that is nearly 10-fold higher than the plasma levels. Itraconazole is also used in pulse regimens as it persists in the stratum corneum for 3-4 weeks (for 6–12 months in nails) after discontinuation. Despite its high cost it has become the drug of choice for treating both cutaneous (fixed and lymphocutaneous) and osteoarticular varieties of sporotrichosis with success rates varying between 90 and 100% (60%–80% for osteoarticular sporotrichosis) [60, 75]. It is administered orally in a dose of 200–400 mg/day (minimum dose 200 mg/day) for a period of 3 to 6 months (1 year for osteoarticular and disseminated forms) as per current guidelines from Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [65]. Adequate response without recurrences or adverse effects has been observed in both fixed and lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis even at 100 mg daily given for a mean duration of 18 weeks but higher doses between 150 and 200 mg daily are generally favored [26, 78, 79]. It is an acceptable alternative in patients who are intolerant to SSKI or when itraconazole is easily available/affordable despite reported relapses or therapeutic failure [73, 74, 79]. Fixed cutaneous variety responds at lesser duration than lymphocutaneous form. However, higher doses are generally recommended for poor responders or relapsed cases but are associated with adverse drug reactions [80]. Bonifaz et al. [81] by using oral itraconazole 400 mg/day for one week with a 3-week break (pulse therapy) achieved clinical and mycological cure in their 4 of 5 patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis (one of four patient with lymphocutaneous variety was lost to follow-up, and one patient had fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis). Thereafter, the drug was administered as pulses until clinical and mycological cure that was achieved after 2 (for fixed cutaneous variety) to 5 pulses. Song et al. [82] further compared oral itraconazole pulse therapy (200 mg b.i.d. for 1 week and off for 3 weeks, average pulses ) with daily dosing (100 mg b.i.d., mean duration months) in prospective, randomized, evaluator blinded study comprising 25 patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis in each group. Although more patients receiving continuous therapy showed cure (95.8%) than those receiving pulse therapy (81.8%) at 48 weeks, the results were not statistically significant. However, not many studies are available on this mode of treatment for making any recommendation. It was moderately effective in osteoarticular sporotrichosis with a cure rate of 73% in a small series of 11 patients who had relapsed after initial cure [75]. However, all 6 patients of osteoarticular sporotrichosis responded to itraconazole in another study [83]. Nevertheless, relapses have occurred 1–7 months after treatment duration of 6–18 months or even after repeated treatment with itraconazole [79]. Nausea and epigastric pain, hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia, altered liver function tests (rarely serious hepatotoxicity), headache, and peripheral edema are some of its reported adverse effects observed more frequently with higher doses. Variable therapeutic outcome is another limitation for its use. No dosage adjustment is usually needed in patients with hepatorenal dysfunction.

Fluconazole is a synthetic broad-spectrum bistriazole antifungal agent that selectively inhibits fungal cytochrome P-450 that is necessary for sterol C-14 alpha-demethylation to ergosterol, an essential for fungal cytoplasmic membrane integrity. This leads to abnormal permeability, membrane bound enzyme activity, and coordination of chitin synthesis. Used orally alone or in combination with SSKI, fluconazole provides another useful therapeutic option. It has been used to treat both fixed and lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis in doses between 150 mg once a week and 200 mg daily [84, 85]. However, higher doses between 400 and 600 mg/day are generally recommended especially for treating visceral and osteoarticular sporotrichosis but the response generally remains poor [36, 72, 86, 87]. Prolonged therapy with doses of 400–800 mg/day given for several months has been associated with alopecia [86]. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, abdomen pain, headache, and abnormal liver enzymes observed commonly rarely necessitate discontinuation of treatment. It is contraindicated in pregnancy because of its teratogenic potential [88]. As the experience with fluconazole therapy in sporotrichosis is limited, it remains a second-line treatment option for patients intolerant to itraconazole for being moderately effective.

Response to Ketoconazole remains discouraging and it is not recommended to treat sporotrichosis [14, 79, 89]. Sharkey-Mathis et al. [79] observed complete failure of treatment with ketoconazole at doses as high as 400–600 mg given daily for 7–9 months. Apart from low efficacy, even lower than fluconazole, hepatotoxicity is another limitation for its use.

5.3. Allylamines (Terbinafine)

Terbinafine is another alternative agent to treat cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis that is unresponsive to itraconazole or when itraconazole is not tolerated. It is well absorbed following oral administration, has low binding to microsomal cytochrome P450 enzyme, and has no effect on bioavailability of other drugs metabolized by this enzyme system. Being highly lipophilic its antifungal activity is maintained from adipose tissue depots few weeks after discontinuation of treatment. It inhibits ergosterol synthesis by inhibiting squalene epoxidase for exerting its fungicidal effect. It is effective against most dermatophytes, Aspergillus species, blastomycosis, histoplasmosis, and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis and other fungi including S. schenckii. It has a long half-life and has been shown to have good in vitro activity against S. schenckii (MIC range of 0.007–0.5 μg/mL) [90]. However, there is no consensus for optimal dosage and duration schedule for terbinafine. It has been used alone or in combination with SSKI to treat few patients in doses ranging from 125 to 1000 mg/day given for 4–37 weeks to achieve clinical cure in small series or case reports [90, 91]. Francesconi et al. [90] achieved cure with terbinafine 250 mg daily without recurrences in 96% of 50 patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis being on simultaneous treatment for other comorbidities like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemias, arrhythmia, and so forth. Its efficacy in a dose of 250 mg/day is reportedly comparable with itraconazole 100 mg/day (92.7% versus 92%) administered for mean duration of 11.5 and 11.8 weeks, respectively [92]. However, terbinafine regimens using higher doses have shown superior efficacy. Terbinafine 500 mg b.i.d. administered for a mean of weeks cured 87% of 35 patients as compared to 52% of 28 patients receiving 250 mg b.i.d. for a mean of weeks in a multicenter, double blind, randomized clinical trial [93]. It is currently a pregnancy category B drug.

5.4. Polyenes (Amphotericin B)

Amphotericin B (deoxycholate), a lipophilic polyene macrolide antibiotics synthesized from Streptomyces nodosus, is available mainly for intravenous or topical use as an antifungal agent. It binds to ergosterol or other sterols in the fungal cytoplasmic membrane causing mechanical interruption enhancing permeability of fungal cell membrane for monovalent ions (sodium, potassium) and other molecules and cell death. However, its main fungicidal activity has been attributed to its ability to cause autooxidation of the cytoplasmic membrane and release of lethal free radicals. It is safe during pregnancy and is a drug of choice for treating severely recalcitrant and disseminated cutaneous and/or pulmonary/meningeal sporotrichosis or HIV-associated disease. It may also be indicated in patients with extensive osteoarticular sporotrichosis or who are not responding to adequate itraconazole therapy but its intra-articular use is considered unwarranted [75]. After initial 1 mg intravenous testing dose, the recommended adult dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day is increased to achieve the targeted dose of 2-3 gm [26]. Fever, chills, headache, malaise, and vomiting that may occur during drug administration can be ameliorated by premedication with sedatives, antipyretics, and corticosteroids. Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, nephrotoxicity, and reversible normochromic normocytic anemia are common adverse effect and require regular once-weekly monitoring. Cardiovascular and bone marrow toxicity occurs rarely [26]. Availability of new lipid formulations of amphotericin B has improved its safety profile by delivering higher concentrations of the drug and decreased nephrotoxicity. It is usually used in a dose of 3–5 mg/kg of lipid formulation or 0.7 to 1.0 mg/kg/day of amphotericin B deoxycholate depending upon the severity of the disease [65]. Although there are no guidelines in view of variable therapeutic response from amphotericin B, it is usually recommended in the initial phase of therapy, until a favorable response is achieved, followed by itraconazole for rest of the treatment course [65].

5.5. Flucytosine

This synthetic fluorinated pyrimidine acts synergistically with amphotericin B to reduce its dose to lessen its toxicity. Amphotericin B enhances permeability of fungal cell wall and facilitates penetration of flucytosine. Its deamination occurs within fungal cells to fluorouracil that disrupts fungal RNA and DNA metabolism. The usual dose is 50–150 mg/kg/day given four times daily for 6–12 weeks [26]. Cure has been achieved for disseminated sporotrichosis of skin and bone with a combination of amphotericin B (4.8 gm) and 5-fluorocytosine (8 gm/day, 100 mg/kg/day) in 6 months [94]. However, its use is no longer recommended due to serious adverse reactions (gastrointestinal intolerance, bone marrow toxicity, and photosensitivity) and availability of better alternatives.

5.6. Newer Antifungals

The use of posaconazole or ravuconazole in patients with sporotrichosis remains understudied. Posaconazole has shown good activity against all the five species of S. schenckii complex and activity of ravuconazole is limited to only against S. brasiliensis in in vitro studies [83]. Echinocandins has shown no activity against S. schenckii and voriconazole is not recommended for treatment of sporotrichosis due to its limited in vitro activity against Sporothrix spp. [9597].

5.7. Antifungal Susceptibility Profile

The variability in therapeutic efficacy and in vitro activity demonstrated in different studies is attributed to the fact that S. schenckii is a complex of different species. For instance, itraconazole has shown good in vitro activity against S. brasiliensis whereas the drug showed high minimum inhibitory concentrations when tested for the other species [95]. Terbinafine was the most active drug in in vitro studies as compared to itraconazole, ketoconazole, or posaconazole against human and animal isolates of S. schenckii while S. brasiliensis showed the best response to antifungals and S. mexicana had the worst response [95, 98]. S. globosa and S. schenckii were found to be itraconazole-resistant strains while terbinafine was the most active drug, followed by ketoconazole and itraconazole, and fluconazole and voriconazole were less effective in a recent in vitro study from Brazil [99]. In a similar study from Sao Paulo (Brazil), itraconazole and posaconazole were moderately effective against S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis while flucytosine, caspofungin, and fluconazole showed no in vitro antifungal activity against any of Sporothrix species (S. schenckii, S. brasiliensis, and S. mexicana) in another study [100]. Posaconazole has shown efficacy for S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii sensu stricto infections in experimental murine models [101]. Voriconazole had not shown antifungal activity against S. brasiliensis and had only fungistatic effect in mice infected with S. schenckii sensu stricto [102].

5.8. Thermotherapy

Temperatures above 38.5°C are detrimental to the growth of Sporothrix and directly damage the pathogen and, in addition, local hyperthermia is considered to enhance intracellular killing capability of neutrophils [103]. The daily application of local heat (42°-43°C) to the lesion for weeks using heat compresses or hand held pocket warmer, infrared or far infrared heater is recommended for treating small lesions in fixed cutaneous variety or cutaneous sporotrichosis in pregnant women pending specific therapy. Its reported cure rate is 71% among 14 patients in a study by using different modes of thermotherapy but in general its efficacy remains largely unevaluated [65, 71, 104]. Nonetheless, it can best be combined with SSKI or itraconazole for adjunctive benefit. The heat is usually applied for 15–60 minutes several times daily until the lesions heal or specific therapy is instituted [71].

5.9. Surgical Interventions

Surgical excision is usually not recommended, as it is not unusual for the disease to get destabilized and disseminate following minor trauma such as biopsy procedure [36]. However, invasive procedures are required for obtaining clinical samples such as full-thickness skin or bone biopsy, arthrocentesis for synovial tissue biopsy, or bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage for culture and transbronchial biopsy to establish laboratory diagnosis. Similarly, surgical therapy sometimes becomes unavoidable as in the management of osteoarticular sporotrichosis along with antimicrobial therapy for eradication of infection as for any other bone and joint infections. Joint damage can be minimized by appropriate drainage of infected joints or debridement of sequestrum but arthrodesis may be needed when joint destruction ensues [66]. Combination of surgical resection of the involved lung segment and amphotericin B is considered better than either mode used alone for pulmonary sporotrichosis [65]. Nevertheless, surgical excision/debridement as a sole therapy is neither effective nor recommended and it will always be prudent to combine surgical procedures with appropriate drug therapy for better therapeutic outcome.

5.10. Treatment of Sporotrichosis in Pregnant Women and Children

SSKI is currently pregnancy category D drug and remains contraindicated in pregnant/lactating women for possible development of neonatal hypothyroidism and/or thyromegaly unless benefits outweigh the risks. Terbinafine is not approved for use in pregnancy and azoles must be avoided. Local hyperthermia can be used to treat cutaneous sporotrichosis that does not require urgent therapy. However, for sporotrichosis that must be treated during pregnancy, liposomal amphotericin B (3–5 mg/kg/day) can be used. As there is no risk of worsening of sporotrichosis or its dissemination to the fetus, treatment is best delayed in pregnant patients. Cases of sporotrichosis in children have been reported less frequently than in adults. Nevertheless, they are not uncommon. Pediatric patients with sporotrichosis can be treated with an equivalent to half the adult dose of SSKI, up to a maximum of 15 drops thrice daily or itraconazole 6–10 mg/kg/day (max 400 mg/d) for 3-4 months as in adults [14, 27]. Most clinicians prefer itraconazole as their first choice of treatment in children for convenient once a day dosing. SSKI, itraconazole, and terbinafine have been used successfully to treat sporotrichosis in infants aged <10 months [105]. However, availability of pediatric formulations of antifungal agents remains a limitation. Local heat therapy is another useful option for limited cutaneous disease in children.

5.11. Treatment of Sporotrichosis in Patients with Immunosuppression or HIV Disease

Predisposing conditions responsible for immunosuppression like diabetes mellitus, chronic alcoholism, myeloproliferative disorders, immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplant, autoimmune disorders, or cancers, prolonged treatment with systemic corticosteroids and HIV infection have been implicated for extracutaneous sporotrichosis, an opportunistic form of infection. Cutaneous lesions are usually multiple and widespread. Cutaneous dissemination with or without systemic involvement can occur in patients with AIDS. Extracutaneous sporotrichosis in the form of invasive sinusitis, ocular sporotrichosis, pulmonary infection, osteoarthritis, and spread to central nervous system has been documented [2, 3, 106]. Immunocompromised patients having dissemination of infection to central nervous system/meninges usually manifest with subtle changes in mental status as the only symptom. Liposomal amphotericin B in recommended doses is the drug of first choice in these patients and they will need suppressive therapy with oral itraconazole 200 mg/d for life after the clinical cure, as eradication of the pathogen may not be possible at all.


Cutaneous and subcutaneous involvement in sporotrichosis is more common than disseminated forms and can be treated readily, if the cost is not precluding, with oral itraconazole 200 mg/d for 2–4 weeks after all lesions have healed usually for 3–6 months. Patients not responding to this regimen should get either oral itraconazole 200 mg twice daily, oral terbinafine 500 mg twice daily, or SSKI in standard dosing schedule. The osteoarticular, visceral, and disseminated forms of sporotrichosis are uncommon and occur more often in patients with immunosuppression and are difficult to treat. Oral itraconazole 200 mg twice daily for at least 12 months is generally recommended for osteoarticular sporotrichosis and less-severe disease. Liposomal amphotericin B (3–5 mg/kg/day) can be used for initial therapy with subsequent switch to oral itraconazole for severe or life-threatening pulmonary sporotrichosis, meningeal sporotrichosis, and disseminated sporotrichosis. Upon clinical stabilization, therapy can be changed to oral itraconazole 200 mg twice daily for a minimum of 12 months.

Recent concept that S. schenckii is a complex of different phylogenic species with different geographic distribution, virulence, and in vitro susceptibility to antifungal agents has helped in understanding variability of therapeutic response observed across antimicrobial agents. This perhaps will form the basis for future research particularly in therapeutics that remains under studied and lacks well-designed controlled clinical trials. The possibility of yeast form of S. schenckii being more susceptible to various antifungal agents also needs to be explored further [107]. Infectious Diseases Society of America currently recommends itraconazole as first line treatment for subcutaneous sporotrichosis. However, SSKI still forms the preferred treatment in most developing countries where major chunk of the disease occurs. Thus, improved formulations of SSKI that are more palatable, have simplified administration regimen, and have improved compliance are highly desirable. The observed improved efficacy of itraconazole in combination with SSKI versus either drug used alone in phaeohyphomycosis requires evaluation in the treatment of sporotrichosis as well [108]. The possible efficacy of topical eberconazole and topical formulations of amphotericin B in cutaneous sporotrichosis, as in case of cutaneous leishmaniasis, too needs assessment [107, 109, 110]. There also remains a scope for new therapies that can cure the disease in shorter period of time and treat the disseminated forms effectively. Inhibition of melanin formation that protects the fungus from body’s immune system can perhaps be another target for development of new therapeutic agents and requires further research. As early diagnosis remains a challenge for the treating physicians, development of new diagnostic tools with shorter turnaround time than culture is another area for future researchers. Patient education for preventive aspects for minimizing the risk and counseling for protracted, prolonged treatment will benefit in the long-term.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. R. Morris-Jones, “Sporotrichosis,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 427–431, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. A. Al-Tawfiq and K. K. Wools, “Disseminated sporotrichosis and Sporothrix schenckii fungemia as the initial presentation of human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1403–1406, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. M. Durden and B. Elewski, “Fungal infections in HIV-infected patients,” Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 200–212, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. C. G. Galhardo, R. M. Z. de Oliveira, A. C. F. do Valle et al., “Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Sporothrix schenckii isolates from a cat-transmitted epidemic of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” Medical Mycology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 141–151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Liu, C. Lian, L. Jin, L. An, G. Yang, and X. Lin, “Characterization of Sporothrix schenckii by random amplification of polymorphic DNA assay,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. Marimon, J. Gené, J. Cano, L. Trilles, M. D. S. Lazéra, and J. Guarro, “Molecular phylogeny of Sporothrix schenckii,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 3251–3256, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Marimon, J. Cano, J. Gené, D. A. Sutton, M. Kawasaki, and J. Guarro, “Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3198–3206, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. I. Arrillaga-Moncrieff, J. Capilla, E. Mayayo et al., “Different virulence levels of the species of Sporothrix in a murine model,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 651–655, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. F. Vismer and P. R. Hull, “Prevalence, epidemiology and geographical distribution of Sporothrix schenckii infections in Gauteng, South Africa,” Mycopathologia, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. M. Dias, M. M. E. Oliveira, M. A. Portela, C. Santos, R. M. Zancope-Oliveira, and N. Lima, “Sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix mexicana, Portugal,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1975–1976, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Quintal, “Sporotrichosis infection on mines of the Witwatersrand,” Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  12. D. M. Dixon, I. F. Salkin, R. A. Duncan et al., “Isolation and characterization of Sporothrix schenckii from clinical and environmental sources associated with the largest U.S. epidemic of sporotrichosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1106–1113, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Itoh, S. Okamoto, and H. Kariya, “Survey of 200 cases of sporotrichosis,” Dermatologica, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 209–213, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. K. Mahajan, N. L. Sharma, R. C. Sharma, M. L. Gupta, G. Garg, and A. K. Kanga, “Cutaneous sporotrichosis in Himachal Pradesh, India,” Mycoses, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. P. Gonçalves, “Sporotrichosis,” in Clinical Tropical Dermatology, O. Canizare and R. Harman, Eds., pp. 88–93, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  16. T. De Araujo, A. C. Marques, and F. Kerdel, “Sporotrichosis,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 737–742, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. C. M. da Rosa, M. L. Scroferneker, R. Vettorato, R. L. Gervini, G. Vettorato, and A. Weber, “Epidemiology of sporotrichosis: a study of 304 cases in Brazil,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 451–459, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. L. Sharma, R. C. Sharma, M. L. Gupta, P. Singh, and N. Gupta, “Sporotrichosis: study of 22 cases from himachal pradesh,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 296–298, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. N. Fleury, P. R. Taborda, A. K. Gupta et al., “Zoonotic sporotrichosis. Transmission to humans by infected domestic cat scratching: report of four cases in São Paulo, Brazil,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 318–322, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  20. K. D. Reed, F. M. Moore, G. E. Geiger, and M. E. Stemper, “Zoonotic transmission of sporotrichosis: case report and review,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 384–387, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. S. Reis, R. Almeida-Paes, M. D. M. Muniz et al., “Molecular characterisation of Sporothrix schenckii isolates from humans and cats involved in the sporotrichosis epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 769–774, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Bastos de Lima Barros, A. de Oliveira Schubach, M. C. Gutierrez Galhardo et al., “Sporotrichosis with widespread cutaneous lesions: report of 24 cases related to transmission by domestic cats in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 677–681, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Falqueto, S. B. Maifrede, and M. A. Ribeiro, “Unusual clinical presentation of sporotrichosis in three members of one family,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 434–438, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. M. Rodrigues, M. de Melo Teixeira, G. S. de Hoog et al., “Phylogenetic analysis reveals a high prevalence of Sporothrix brasiliensis in feline sporotrichosis outbreaks,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 6, Article ID e2281, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. P. Nusbaum, N. Gulbas, and S. N. Horwitz, “Sporotrichosis acquired from a cat,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 386–391, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. G. Mercurio and B. E. Elewski, “Therapy of sporotrichosis,” Seminars in Dermatology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285–289, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Bonifaz, A. Saúl, V. Paredes-Solis et al., “Sporotrichosis in childhood: clinical and therapeutic experience in 25 patients,” Pediatric Dermatology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 369–372, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. C. Gutierrez-Galhardo, M. B. L. Barros, A. O. Schubach et al., “Erythema multiforme associated with sporotrichosis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 507–509, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Schubach, M. B. de Lima Barros, T. M. P. Schubach et al., “Primary conjunctival sporotrichosis: two cases from a zoonotic epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” Cornea, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 491–493, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. J. Kwon-Chung, “Comparison of isolates of Sporothrix schenckii obtained from fixed cutaneous lesions with isolates from other types of lesions,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 424–431, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. H. Verner and B. E. Werner, “Sporotrichosis in man and animal,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 692–700, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. B. de Albornoz, M. Mendoza, and E. D. de Torres, “Growth temperatures of isolates of Sporothrix schenckii from disseminated and fixed cutaneous lesions of sporotrichosis,” Mycopathologia, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 81–83, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. I. A. C. Diaz, “Epidemiology of sporotrichosis in Latin America,” Mycopathologia, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. E. Mackinnon, “Regional peculiarities of some deep mycoses,” Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. S. Rafal and J. E. Rasmussen, “An unusual presentation of fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 928–932, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. L. Sharma, K. I. S. Mehta, V. K. Mahajan, A. K. Kanga, V. C. Sharma, and G. R. Tegta, “Cutaneous sporotrichosis of face: polymorphism and reactivation after intralesional triamcinolone,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 188–190, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. K. Mahajan, N. L. Sharma, V. Shanker, P. Gupta, and K. Mardi, “Cutaneous sporotrichosis: unusual clinical presentations,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 276–280, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. K. Rathi, M. Ramam, and C. Rajendran, “Localized cutaneous sporotrichosis lasting for 10 years,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 239–240, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  39. P. G. Pappas, I. Tellez, A. E. Deep, D. Nolasco, W. Holgado, and B. Bustamante, “Sporotrichosis in Peru: description of an area of hyperendemicity,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. B. de Lima Barros, A. de Oliveira Schubach, M. C. G. Galhardo et al., “Sporotrichosis with widespread cutaneous lesions: report of 24 cases related to transmission by domestic cats in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 677–681, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. C. Janes and R. J. Mann, “Extracutaneous sporotrichosis,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 441–445, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. W. Steele, P. B. Cannady Jr., W. L. Moore Jr., and L. O. Gentry, “Skin test and blastogenic responses to Sporotrichum schenckii,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 155–160, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  43. M. Morgan and R. Reves, “Invasive sinusitis due to Sporothrix schenckii in a patient with AIDS,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1319–1320, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Gordhan, P. K. Ramdial, N. Morar, S. D. Moodley, and J. Aboobaker, “Disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis: a marker of osteoarticular sporotrichosis masquerading as gout,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 717–719, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. Vieira-Dias, C. M. Sena, F. Oréfice, M. A. G. Tanure, and J. S. Hamdan, “Ocular and concomitant cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Mycoses, vol. 40, no. 5-6, pp. 197–201, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. A. Davis, “Sporotrichosis,” Dermatologic Clinics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. F. Haponik, M. K. Hill, and C. C. Craighead, “Pulmonary sporotrichosis with massive hemoptysis,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 297, no. 4, pp. 251–253, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. C. Sharma and N. L. Sharma, “Sporotrichoid reactions to mycobacterial infections,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 283–285, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  49. D. R. Byrd, R. A. El-Azhary, L. E. Gibson, and G. D. Roberts, “Sporotrichosis masquerading as pyoderma gangrenosum: case report and review of 19 cases of sporotrichosis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 581–584, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Zaharopoulos, “Fine needle aspiration cytologic diagnosis of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis: a case report,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  51. E. S. Civila, J. Bonasse, I. A. Conti-Díaz, and R. A. Vignale, “Importance of the direct fresh examination in the diagnosis of cutaneous sporotrichosis,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 808–810, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. B. C. Hirsh and W. C. Johnson, “Pathology of granulomatous diseases. Mixed inflammatory granulomas,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 585–597, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. W. Rippon, “Sporotrichosis,” in Medical Mycology: The Pathogenic Fungi and the Pathogenic Actinomycetes, J. W. Rippon, Ed., pp. 325–352, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  54. G. Rodríguez and L. Sarmiento, “The asteroid bodies of Sporothrix schenckii,” The American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 20, pp. 246–249, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  55. W. Kaplan and M. S. Ivens, “Fluorescent antibody staining of Sporotrichum schenckii in cultures and clinical materials,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 35, pp. 151–159, 1960. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. R. Irizarry-Rovira, L. Kaufman, J. A. Christian et al., “Diagnosis of sporotrichosis in a donkey using direct fluorescein-labeled antibody testing,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 180–183, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. R. Romero-Martinez, M. Wheeler, A. Guerrero-Plata, G. Rico, and H. Torres-Guerrero, “Biosynthesis and functions of melanin in Sporothrix schenckii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3696–3703, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. A. Kauffman, “Sporotrichosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. E. N. Scott and H. G. Muchmore, “Immunoblot analysis of antibody responses to Sporothrix schenckii,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 300–304, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  60. S. Hu, W.-H. Chung, S.-I. Hung et al., “Detection of Sporothrix schenckii in clinical samples by a nested PCR assay,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1414–1418, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. M. Rodrigues, G. S. de Hoog, and Z. P. de Camargo, “Genotyping species of the Sporothrix schenckii complex by PCR-RFLP of calmodulin,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 383–387, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C. Toriello, L. C. Arjona-Rosado, M. L. Diaz-Gomez, and M. L. Taylor, “Efficiency of crude and purified fungal antigens in serodiagnosis to discriminate mycotic from other respiratory diseases,” Mycoses, vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 133–140, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  63. R. Arenas, “Sporotrichosis,” in Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology & Microbial Infections: Medical Mycology, W. G. Merz and R. J. Hay, Eds., pp. 367–384, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 10th edition, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  64. Y. P. Loureiro and B. Lopes, “Concanavalin A-binding cell wall antigens of Sporothrix schenckii: a serological study,” Medical Mycology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  65. C. A. Kauffman, B. Bustamante, S. W. Chapman, and P. G. Pappas, “Clinical practice guidelines for the management of sporotrichosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1255–1265, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. R. S. Purvis, D. G. Diven, R. D. Drechsel, J. H. Calhoun, and S. K. Tyring, “Sporotrichosis presenting as arthritis and subcutaneous nodules,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 879–884, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. B. Coskun, Y. Saral, N. Akpolat, A. Ataseven, and D. Çiçek, “Sporotrichosis successfully treated with terbinafine and potassium iodide: case report and review of the literature,” Mycopathologia, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 53–56, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Hiruma and S. Kagawa, “Ultrastructure of Sporothrix schenckii treated with iodine-potassium iodide solution,” Mycopathologia, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. N. L. Sharma, V. K. Mahajan, N. Verma, and S. Thakur, “Cutaneous sporotrichosis: an unusual clinico-pathologic and therapeutic presentation,” Mycoses, vol. 46, no. 11-12, pp. 515–518, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. F. Ray and E. M. Rockwood, “Sporotrichosis: report of a case which was resistant to treatment,” Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 1942. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C. A. Kauffman, “Old and new therapies for sporotrichosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 981–985, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. V. K. Sharma, S. Kaur, B. Kumar et al., “Sporotrichosis in North Western India,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 142–147, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  73. K. Sandhu and S. Gupta, “Potassium iodide remains the most effective therapy for cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Journal of Dermatological Treatment, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 200–202, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. H. Fujii, M. Tanioka, M. Yonezawa et al., “A case of atypical sporotrichosis with multifocal cutaneous ulcers,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. Cabezas, B. Bustamante, W. Holgado, and R. E. Begue, “Treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis with one daily dose of potassium iodide,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 352–354, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. B. Sterling and W. R. Heymann, “Potassium iodide in dermatology: a 19th century drug for the 21st century—uses, pharmacology, adverse effects, and contraindications,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 691–697, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. A. Kauffman, R. Hajjeh, and S. W. Chapman, “Practice guidelines for the management of patients with sporotrichosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 684–687, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. Restrepo, J. Robledo, I. Gomez, A. M. Tabares, and R. Gutiérrez, “Itraconazole therapy in lymphangitic and cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 413–417, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  79. P. K. Sharkey-Mathis, C. A. Kauffman, J. R. Graybill et al., “Treatment of sporotrichosis with itraconazole,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 279–285, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. B. de Lima Barros, A. O. Schubach, R. de Vasconcellos Carvalhaes de Oliveira, E. B. Martins, J. L. Teixeira, and B. Wanke, “Treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis with itraconazole—study of 645 patients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. e200–e206, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Bonifaz, L. Fierro, A. Saúl, and R. M. Ponce, “Cutaneous sporotrichosis. Intermittent treatment (pulses) with itraconazole,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 18, pp. 1–4, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  82. Y. Song, S.-X. Zhong, L. Yao et al., “Efficacy and safety of itraconazole pulses vs. continuous regimen in cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 302–305, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. E. Winn, J. Anderson, J. Piper, N. E. Aronson, and J. Pluss, “Systemic sporotrichosis treated with itraconazole,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 210–217, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Z. Ghodsi, S. Shams, Z. Naraghi et al., “An unusual case of cutaneous sporotrichosis and its response to weekly fluconazole,” Mycoses, vol. 43, pp. 75–77, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. L. G. M. Castro, W. Belda Jr., L. C. Cuce, S. A. P. Sampaio, and D. A. Stevens, “Successful treatment of sporotrichosis with oral fluconazole: a report of three cases,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 352–356, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. A. Kauffman, P. G. Pappas, D. S. McKinsey et al., “Treatment of lymphocutaneous and visceral sporotrichosis with fluconazole,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. Diaz, R. Negroni, F. Montero-Gei et al., “A Pan-American 5-year study of fluconazole therapy for deep mycoses in the immunocompetent host,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, supplement 1, pp. S68–S76, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. T. J. Pursley, I. K. Blomquist, J. Abraham, H. F. Andersen, and J. A. Bartley, “Fluconazole-induced congenital anomalies in three infants,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 336–340, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. W. E. Dismukes, A. M. Stamm, J. R. Graybill et al., “Treatment of systemic mycoses with ketoconazole: emphasis on toxicity and clinical response in 52 patients. National institute of allergy and infectious diseases collaborative antifungal study,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. G. Francesconi, A. Valle, S. Passos, R. Reis, and M. Galhardo, “Terbinafine (250 mg/day): an effective and safe treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1273–1276, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. P. R. Hull and H. F. Vismer, “Treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis with terbinafine,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 126, supplement 39, pp. 51–55, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. Francesconi, A. C. F. do Valle, S. L. Passos et al., “Comparative study of 250 mg/day terbinafine and 100 mg/day itraconazole for the treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis,” Mycopathologia, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 349–354, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. W. Chapman, P. Pappas, C. Kauffmann et al., “Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of two doses of terbinafine (500 and 1000 mg day−1) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis,” Mycoses, vol. 47, no. 1-2, pp. 62–68, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. W. B. Shelley and P. A. Sica Jr., “Disseminate sporotrichosis of skin and bone cured with 5-fluorocytosine: photosensitivity as a complication,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. R. Marimon, C. Serena, J. Gené, J. Cano, and J. Guarro, “In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of five species of Sporothrix,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 732–734, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. B. Bustamante and P. E. Campos, “Sporotrichosis treatment: overview and update,” Current Fungal Infection Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. P. G. Pappas, “The role of azoles in the treatment of invasive mycoses: review of the infectious diseases society of America guidelines,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 24, supplement 2, pp. S1–S13, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. L. M. Kohler, P. C. F. Monteiro, R. C. Hahn, and J. S. Hamdan, “In vitro susceptibilities of isolates of Sporothrix schenckii to itraconazole and terbinafine,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 4319–4320, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. C. D. O. Stopiglia, C. M. Magagnin, M. R. Castrillón et al., “Antifungal susceptibilities and identification of species of the Sporothrix schenckii complex isolated in Brazil,” Medical Mycology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. A. M. Rodrigues, G. S. de Hoog, D. de Cássia Pires et al., “Genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility profiles in causative agents of sporotrichosis,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, article 219, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. F. Fernández-Silva, J. Capilla, E. Mayayo, and J. Guarro, “Efficacy of posaconazole in murine experimental sporotrichosis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2273–2277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. F. Fernández-Silva, J. Capilla, E. Mayayo, and J. Guarro, “Modest efficacy of voriconazole against murine infections by Sporothrix schenckii and lack of efficacy against Sporothrix brasiliensis,” Mycoses, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 121–124, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. C. B. Doherty, S. D. Doherty, and T. Rosen, “Thermotherapy in dermatologic infections,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 909–927, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Hiruma, A. Kawada, H. Noguchi, A. Ishibashi, and I. A. C. Diaz, “Hyperthermic treatment of sporotrichosis: experimental use of infrared and far infrared rays,” Mycoses, vol. 35, no. 11-12, pp. 293–299, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  105. Y. Song, L. Yao, S.-X. Zhong, Y.-P. Tian, Y.-Y. Liu, and S.-S. Li, “Infant sporotrichosis in northeast China: a report of 15 cases,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 522–529, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. M. Rocha, T. Dassin, R. Lira, E. L. Lima, L. C. Severo, and A. T. Londero, “Sporotrichosis in patient with AIDS: report of a case and review,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 133–136, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  107. L. Trilles, B. Fernández-Torres, M. dos Santos Lazéra et al., “In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Sporothrix schenckii in two growth phases,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 3952–3954, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. V. K. Mahajan, P. S. Chauhan, K. S. Mehta, C. Abhinav, V. Sharma, and K. Thakur, “Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis of the face presenting as rhinoentomophthoramycosis,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1105–1108, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. A. Zvulunov, E. Cagnano, S. Frankenburg, Y. Barenholz, and D. Vardy, “Topical treatment of persistent cutaneous leishmaniasis with ethanolic lipid amphotericin B,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 567–569, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. V. K. Mahajan, K. S. Mehta, P. S. Chauhan, M. Gupta, R. Sharma, and R. Rawat, “Fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis treated with topical amphotericin B and heat therapy in an immune suppressed patient,” Medical Mycology Case Reports, in press. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Vikram K. Mahajan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.