Depression Research and Treatment / 2014 / Article / Tab 2

Review Article

Comparing the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Bias corrected (Hedges) effect sizes for each study.

rTMSECT
Study Confidence interval Confidence interval
Effect sizeStandard errorLowerUpperEffect sizeStandard errorLowerUpper

Keshtkar 2011 [31]0.900.260.391.402.820.322.213.44
Hansen et al. 2011 [27]1.310.280.751.872.070.321.452.70
Eranti 2007 [32]0.740.300.161.332.830.431.993.66
Rosa et al. 2006 [29]1.610.360.892.321.560.420.742.38
Schulze-Rauschenbach et al. 2005 [33]1.900.431.072.731.670.440.812.53
O'Connor et al. 2003 [20]0.560.39−0.201.312.270.481.323.22
Grunhaus et al. 2003 [34]1.540.360.832.251.930.381.182.68
Janicak et al. 2002 [26]1.930.471.002.862.170.591.003.33
Grunhaus et al. 2000 [28]1.490.360.792.191.900.381.162.65

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.