Clinical Study

Use of 4-Fr versus 6-Fr Nasobiliary Catheter for Biliary Drainage: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study

Table 2

Outcomes.

4Fr group6Fr group value
()()

Technical success rate (%)118 (99.1)121 (95.3)0.15
Clinical success rate (%)109 (91.6)114 (89.8)0.78
ALP (IU/L)
 Before biliary drainage1217 (865)1168 (908)0.49
 After biliary drainage963 (673)932 (681)0.51
 ALP decreasing rate (%), mean (SD)18.6 (13.6)18.3 (14.5)0.51
γ-GTP (IU/L)
 Before biliary drainage673 (511)679 (542)0.52
 After biliary drainage504 (377)496 (412)0.51
γ-GTP decreasing rate (%), mean (SD)23.9 (13.6)25.5 (22.9)0.1
Amount of bile output (mL/hour), mean (SD)22.4 (4.4)22.6 (3.5)0.32
Displacement
 Willful removal by the doctor, (%)3 (3.7)6 (12.0)0.56
 Self-removal by the patient, (%)5 (3.7)1 (1.2)0.20
 Spontaneous displacement, (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

4Fr group6Fr group
()()

VAS score of discomfort (cm)
 24 h after ERCP, mean (SD)2.4 (2.2)3.5 (2.6)
 48 h after ERCP, mean (SD)2.2 (2.2)3.1 (2.4)

SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analog scale.
Significant difference.
ALP: Alkaline phosphatase.
γ-GTP: Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase.