Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2011 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 239237 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/239237

Eibhlín McCarthy, Jim M. O'Mahony, "What's in a Name? Can Mullein Weed Beat TB Where Modern Drugs Are Failing?", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 239237, 7 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/239237

What's in a Name? Can Mullein Weed Beat TB Where Modern Drugs Are Failing?

Received20 Apr 2010
Accepted31 Aug 2010
Published19 Sep 2010


Common mullein weed (Verbascum thapsus) has a large number of synonyms and old local “nick names” which connect the plant with mycobacteria. A strong history of medicinal use has been uncovered for the treatment of tuberculosis, tubercular skin disease, leprosy, and mycobacterial disease in animals. Here, we examine problems encountered in treating such diseases today, the historical and scientific links between mullein and pathogenic bacteria, and the possibility that this common weed could harbour the answer to beating one of the world's biggest infectious killers.

1. Tuberculosis: Modern Day Scourge

It has killed ancient Egyptians and Iron Age British settlers as well as John Keats, D. H. Lawrence, and Vivien Leigh. Throughout history, it has left its mark on our ancestors as “phthisis”, “consumption”, and the “white plague”. But far from being a disease of the past, Tuberculosis (TB) is now killing almost 5000 per day, or one person about every 20 seconds [1]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has declared a global emergency [2] and as antibiotic resistance increases [3], the hunt for new treatments continues.

2. Treating Tuberculosis—Present and Future

Mycobacteria are notoriously tough micro-organisms. Their intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics can be largely attributed to the unique structure of the cell envelope, which is rich in high molecular weight fatty acids and peptidoglycan cross-linkage [6]. Permeability is mainly restricted to lipophilic molecules [7] such as the anti-TB agent Rifampicin. This envelope also seems to be a dynamic structure—changing according to whether the bacterium is growing or persisting in host tissues [8]. A combination of antibiotics is therefore required to treat mycobacterial infection. Current Irish recommendations are that all new TB patients (including HIV positive) who have not previously been treated with anti-TB drugs receive the internationally accepted first line treatment regimen outlined by the WHO [9]. This includes initial treatment with Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide, and Ethambutol for two months, followed by a four-month continuation phase of further treatment with Isoniazid and Rifampicin. In the case of a 60 kg adult, this equates to over half a kilogram of antibiotics. Monthly sputum samples are examined for the continued presence and/or reappearance of tubercle bacilli—in this case, treatment needs to be modified due to resistance and may be extended to 9 months or longer. Extensively drug-resistant TB (often incurable) first emerged in 2006 [10] and has now been reported in over 50 countries worldwide [1]. The WHO recently reported that in some areas of the world, one in four people with TB becomes ill with a form of the disease that can no longer be treated with standard drugs [11].

Three of the four first-line antibiotics listed above work by directly or indirectly affecting the synthesis of the mycobacterial cell wall and this remains an area of pharmaceutical interest [12]. The three compounds which are currently in phase II/III clinical development (namely moxifloxacin, PA824, and TMC207) elicit their activity by the inhibition of enzymes involved in cell division, respiration, and mycolic acid synthesis [13, 14]. While these new drugs were synthetically engineered, natural compounds are once again playing a bigger role in the fight against TB. Plant extracts have been shown to be capable of inhibition comparable to that of Streptomycin [15], have shown activity against multidrug resistant TB [16], and have been shown to improve the immune response to TB both in vitro and in clinical trials [17, 18]. Pharmaceutical science is increasingly beginning to realise that the “silver bullet” compounds we are attempting to engineer may have been present in nature all along.

3. Nature as a Source of Medicinal Compounds

Up to half of pharmaceutical agents prescribed today contain at least one ingredient derived from plants [19]—an indication that mainstream medicine has become more receptive to the use of drugs derived from botanical sources. Some of the more well-known medicines entrusted to us by Mother Nature include the analgesics codeine, salicin and morphine, the antimalarial artemisinin, the antihistamine ephedrine, and the cardiac drug digoxin. In many cases, history has given scientists clues as to which plants may contain therapeutic compounds. Of the 119 plant-derived pharmaceutical medicines recently examined by the WHO, about 74 percent are used in modern medicine in ways that correlate directly with their traditional uses as herbal medicines by native cultures [20]. As a result, scientists involved in the hunt for new anti-TB drugs are beginning to look to the past for inspiration. The Global Alliance for TB Drug Development (TB Alliance) recently announced a partnership with the Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMCASs) to discover and develop promising, novel, and antituberculosis agents from natural sources [21]. The Chinese are by no means the only nationality to use traditional herbal remedies, nor the only nationality to record them. The scientific discipline known as ethnopharmacology aims to use the knowledge assembled by indigenous peoples worldwide regarding the plants they have used as traditional remedies in their own areas [22, 23]. Ireland is a country with a well-documented history of tubercular disease and leprosy [24]. To date, however, no research has been carried out into Irish traditional remedies for mycobacterial diseases such as TB.

Ireland has a relatively low number of native vascular plant species, at 815 [25]. During a review of those plants most used in traditional Irish medicine, one repeatedly showed links to TB and other diseases caused by mycobacteria. This plant is Verbascum thapsus, or common mullein.

4. Irish Mullein Weed—Notes from History

Mullein has grown wild throughout Ireland for centuries—on walls, wasteland, quarries, and roadsides. It can grow to heights of up to two metres, with a round woolly stem, broad basal leaves, and yellow flowers which bloom from June to September (Figure 1( )) [4, 26]. This physical description explains many of the synonyms used for this plant. These include Candlewick Plant, Torches, Our Lady's Flannel, Shepherd's Staff, and Beggar's Stalk [27]. Census catalogues of the Irish flora, vice-county maps, and hectad maps all show the widespread distribution of mullein in Ireland [5, 28] (Figure 1( )). Upon reviewing Irish traditional medicine, mullein soon becomes apparent as a leading remedy in the treatment of tuberculosis. Even up until the relatively recent introduction of antimycobacterial drugs, mullein was cultivated on a large scale in this country and even sold in the capital’s best chemist shops [29]. A simple “pharmaceutical trial” in the late nineteenth century showed that the herb was beneficial in cases of tuberculosis. Dr. Quinlan of St. Vincent’s hospital (Dublin, Ireland) noted mullein as “a trusted popular remedy in Ireland” and reported positive findings in 6 out of 7 cases where the herb was used to treat tubercular patients [30].

The first English language herbals—written as far back as the sixteenth century—also point to mullein as a TB remedy and praise it’s soothing and expectorant properties. Culpeper advises that mullein will help a persistent cough, tumours, or inflammations of the throat [31], while Gerard noted antibacterial properties of the plant, commenting on its use as a food preservative [32]. In more recent times, the extensive herbal collection by Grieve names mullein as a “remedy of the greatest antiquity for coughs....cultivated in gardens for the purpose.... in steady demand by sufferers from pulmonary consumption” and notes that it “controls the hacking cough of consumption....and bleeding of the lungs” [27]. The fine hairs which cover the surface of the mullein leaf (Figure 1( )) may themselves have encouraged expectoration from the lungs, however, most traditional remedies encourage straining the leaf decoction to remove these before drinking [27]. The herb’s potential was also noted across the Atlantic. King's American Dispensatory records that it is useful in cases of “protracted cough and haemoptysis” [33] while the herbalist Edward Shook went so far as to say that TB could be cured in its early stages using this herb alone [34].

While its historical ties with tuberculosis abound, perhaps even more intriguing is the mullein weed’s apparent association with the genus Mycobacterium in general. While revising historical remedies, we must consider our modern day understanding of microbiology. It is now possible to prove that diseases which were once believed to be completely unrelated are in fact caused by the same pathogen. Mycobacteria are an example of this—causing a variety of infections in humans and animals (Table 1).

NameClinical form

Phthisis/Consumption/White plagueFormer names for Tuberculosis (TB). Symptoms include persistent coughing, weight loss, night sweats, shortness of breath, and haemoptysis (blood in sputum)
ScrofulaTB of the neck lymph nodes, known as cervical lymphadenitis
Pott’s diseaseTB of the spine
Hansen’s diseaseLeprosy, skin lesions
Bovine TBTuberculosis in cattle

Mullein is a member of the Scrophulariaceae. This botanical family took its name from Scrophularia, or figwort—a typical member of the family which was used to treat the tuberculous infection of the lymph nodes of the neck known as scrofula [35]. This name was in turn derived from the Latin scrofa, meaning “breeding sow”. The connection may be because the glands associated with the disease resemble the body of a sow or because pigs were thought to be prone to the disease. The use of the botanical name Scrophularia can be traced back at least five hundred years—it was used by the German botanist Otto Brunfels in 1532 [36], but the name may have been in use for some time previously. The 18th century botanists Tournefort (1719) and Linnaeus (1753) went on to clearly define the genus, giving figwort the official binominal title Scrophularia nodosa [37]. At that time, belief in the Doctrine of Signatures was still widespread. This was the concept that God himself had “signed” plants which could cure diseases with features of the disease itself or the organ it affected. In this case, figwort and related plants were reputed to cure scrofula because their nodular roots resembled the diseased lymph nodes [38]. Taking physical characteristics and medicinal uses into account, Linnaeus first proposed the family Scrophulariaceae (Figure 2).

In a study of the common names of British plants, Prior states that the word Mullein translated to Moleyn in Anglo-Saxon and Malen in Old French, derived from the Latin malandrium—as was the term “malanders”, an old term for leprosy. He also notes that “the term “malandre” became also applied to diseases of cattle, to lung diseases among the rest, and the plant being used as a remedy, acquired its name of “Mullein” and “Bullock's Lungwort”” [39]. This links the mullein weed to leprosy and bovine TB. These conditions—along with scrofula—are now known to be caused by Mycobacteria. The early herbals also support a connection with bovine TB—John Parkinson gave broth of mullein to cattle suffering from coughs in the seventeenth century [40]. Finally, in Cameron’s Gaelic names of plants, the synonym cow’s lungwort is recorded while a Gaelic name for mullein is given as Cuingeal—possibly derived from cuing, meaning “shortness of breath” [41].

5. Investigating Mullein

The extensive historical use of mullein has inspired scientists to investigate the plant further. To date, a number of the ancient claims have actually proved to be true.

Modern day European complimentary medicine frequently hails mullein flower oil as a remedy for earache [42]. Trials have shown a statistically significant improvement in ear pain associated with acute Otitis Media when treated with the infusion [43]. The proven anti-inflammatory action of the constituent verbascoside [44] is the likely cause for this successful treatment though antimicrobial agents may also play a part. Extracts of the mullein leaf have also been shown in laboratory studies to possess antitumour, antiviral, antifungal [4548], and—most interestingly for the purpose of this paper—antibacterial properties. Turker and Camper showed aqueous Mullein leaf extracts to be effective against gram positive and gram negative microorganisms, with the activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae rivalling that of the Erythromycin control [49]. To date, activity against Mycobacterium species has not been determined.

6. Battles in Nature: Vascular Plants versus Mycobacteria

In the absence of an acquired immune system such as that possessed by humans, plants instead rely on an enormous variety of small-molecule antimicrobials. Over 100,000 such compounds are synthesised by plants [57] and activity is particularly evident against gram positive bacteria [58]. This is not surprising, as the most common bacteria in soil come under the genera Bacillus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, and Mycobacterium—all of which are gram positive rods. Projects in natural product discovery are increasing following a recent dip [59] and many compounds with antimycobacterial properties have been uncovered from natural sources [60, 61]. In 2000, Newton reported that on a review of literature available at that time, extracts from 138 plant species and 112 pure metabolites had moderate to high antimycobacterial activities [62]. In the intervening years, ethnopharmacological studies have continued to add to the pool of natural antimycobacterials, with promising compounds extracted from the traditional remedies of countries as far removed as Mexico [23], Ethiopia [63], and India [64]. A 2004 review [60] divided the most promising botanical compounds tested by in vitro bioassays against Mycobacterium tuberculosis as follows.(1)Alkaloids.(2)Flavones, coumarins, chromone, and chalcone.(3)Terpenoids.(4)Steroids and saponins.(5)Phenols and polyphenols.

Compounds from each of the above classes have also been isolated from Verbascum species—which includes the “mulleins”.

7. The Pharmacological Potential of Mullein

As already outlined, the mulleins (Verbascum spp.) have long been known to possess expectorant and demulcent properties—these are now attributed mainly to its mucilagenous constituents and saponins [65]. Although to date mullein has not been studied in depth against mycobacteria, antibacterial efficacy against other bacteria has been proven [49] while extracts of other Verbascum species endemic to Turkey have activity against the Mycobacterium smegmatis model [66]. In particular phytochemical investigations have uncovered a diverse range of compounds within Verbascum species—both from whole plant [5053] and specific parts [5456] (Table 2). Lipophilic compounds are particularly abundant.

Compound(s)Verbascum speciesIsolated fromRef

Triterpenoid saponins, iridoid glycosides, steroids, sesquiterpenes, steronesV.thapsusWhole plant[50]

Phenylethanoid glycosides, lignans, laterioside and harpagosideV.thapsusWhole plant[51]

Siakogenins, oligosaccharides, flavonesV.thapsusWhole plant[52]

Ajugol, picroside IV, buddlindeterpene A, B and CV.thapsusWhole plant[53]

Flavonoids and phenylethanoids.V.densiflorum, V.phlomoidesFlowers[54]

Phenylethanoid glycosidesV.wiedemannianumRoots[55]

Verbaspinoside, ajugol, phenylpropanoid glycosidesV.spinosumAerial parts[56]

As a family, the Scrophulariaceae (to which Verbascum species belong) harbour the chemotaxonomic markers of verbascoside, aucubin, and catalpol [67]. The latter are iridoids—a class of secondary metabolites found in a wide variety of medicinal plants, most often bound to glucose. Hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond is thought to be a prerequisite for biological activity [68]. Plants produce iridoids as a defence against infection by micro-organisms; antimicrobial action is amongst their wide range of bioactivities. The compounds shown to be common amongst Verbascum species are examples of this. The hydrolysis products of aucubin and catalpol, and aucubin itself, have been shown to have antimicrobial activity [69, 70]. Verbascoside has been investigated further. It has been shown to be effective against a wide range of bacteria [71] but is particularly active against gram positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, including drug resistant strains [72]. One possible mode of action is the inhibition of leucine uptake and hence protein synthesis [73]. Furthermore, Funes et al. have recently shown that verbascoside can disrupt the phospholipid/water interface of bacterial membranes [74].

Saponins are also a major chemical constituent of mullein. This diverse class of compounds are derived from a 30-carbon precursor and perform a range of biological actions. While previous studies have shown weak antimicrobial activity and often only at low cell density [46, 75], some of the most promising activities have been against mycobacteria [76].

8. Future Potential

It would appear that a member of the Scrophulariaceae which was once known as “bullock’s lungwort” and has now been proven to be rich in lipophilic molecules is an ideal place to mine for potential anti-TB agents. However, while Verbascum species have been shown to contain a diverse range of compounds, and similar compounds have been shown to have antimycobacterial properties, the two have yet to come together in a comprehensive study. Thorough in-vitro screening of the bioactivity of mullein extracts against mycobacteria is required, such as that carried out by Turker and Camper against other respiratory pathogens. When dealing with the spectrum of animal- and human-related mycobacterial diseases, continued laboratory screening of herbal extracts should be encouraged.

It is clear that many of mullein’s historical uses, synonyms, anecdotes, and local “nick names” connect this plant with mycobacteria. Of course, the historical links between mycobacteria and mullein may be coincidental. A large number of medicinal uses have been recorded for this plant while its synonyms are almost as numerous. While this is common for a traditional medicinal plant, numerous connections to one pathogen—recorded throughout history and across the world—are not. Whether the link is coincidental or rooted in true antimycobacterial actions, it merits investigation. An ancient plant, an ancient infection, an ancient link, and a modern-day cure?


  1. “Global tuberculosis control - epidemiology, strategy, financing,” WHO Report 2009, http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2009/en/. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Swaminathan, “Tuberculosis, the only infectious disease to be declared a "global emergency" by the WHO, is a major cause of death in adults and children worldwide,” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. S1–S2, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. “World Health organisation 2009 update – Tuberculosis facts,” April 2010, http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2009/tbfactsheet_2009update_one_page.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Z. Devlin, “Information on Great Mullein,” April 2010, http://www.wildflowersofireland.net/plant_detail.php?id_flower=180#glos. View at: Google Scholar
  5. Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI), “Hectad map of Verbascum thapsus (Great Mullein/Common Mullein) in GB and Ireland. BSBI Maps Scheme,” http://www.bsbimaps.org.uk/atlas/map_page.php?spid=2157.0&sppname=Verbascum%20thapsus&commname=Great%20Mullein%20/%20Common%20Mullein. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. C. Palomino, Tuberculosis 2007: from basic science to patient care, Antwerp, Belgium, 2007.
  7. M. Niederweis, “Mycobacterial porins—new channel proteins in unique outer membranes,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1167–1177, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Kremer and G. Besra, “A waxy tale, by Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” in Tuberculosis and the Tubercle Bacillus, ASM Press, Washington DC, USA, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Tuberculosis Coalition for Technical Assistance and International Standards for Tuberculosis care (ISTC), “The Hague: Tuberculosis Coalition for Technical Assistance 2006,” April 2010, http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2006/istc_report.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  10. CDC and WHO, “Emergence of mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs—worldwide, 2000–2004,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 301–305, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  11. WHO, “Drug resistane tuberculosis now at record levels,” Press release 18 March 2010. Geneva, Switzerland and Washington, DC, USA, April 2010, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2010/drug_resistant_tb_20100318/en/index.html. View at: Google Scholar
  12. L. G. Dover, A. Bhatt, V. Bhowruth, B. E. Willcox, and G. S. Besra, “New drugs and vaccines for drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 481–497, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Andries, P. Verhasselt, J. Guillemont et al., “A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5707, pp. 223–227, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. U. Manjunatha, H. I. Boshoff, and C. E. Barry, “The mechanism of action of PA-824: novel insights from transcriptional profiling,” Communicative & Integrative Biology, vol. 2, pp. 215–218, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. D. Frame, E. Ríos-Olivares, L. De Jesús, D. Ortiz, J. Pagán, and S. Méndez, “Plants from Puerto Rico with anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis properties,” Puerto Rico health sciences journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 243–252, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Jimenez-Arellanes, M. Meckes, R. Ramirez, J. Torres, and J. Luna-Herrera, “Activity against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mexican plants used to treat respiratory diseases,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 903–908, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Sinha, J. Mehrotra, L. Bala, A. K. Jaiswal, and B. N. Dhawan, “Picroliv, the iridoid glycoside fraction of Picrorhiza kurroa, selectively augments human T cell response to mycobacterial protein antigens,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 579–588, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. I. Zaitzeva, S. L. Matveeva, T. G. Gerasimova et al., “Treatment of cavitary and infiltrating pulmonary tuberculosis with and without the immunomodulator Dzherelo,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1154–1162, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. M. Cowan, “Plant products as antimicrobial agents,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 564–582, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. R. Farnsworth, “The role of ethnopharmacology in drug development,” Ciba Foundation symposium, vol. 154, pp. 2–11, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  21. TBAlliance, “TB Alliance Announces Four Drug Discovery Collaborations: Early-Stage Research Partnerships Aim to Stock Tuberculosis Drug Pipeline,” Press release, Beijing, China and New York, NY, USA, 2009, http://www.tballiance.org/newscenter/view-brief.php?id=851. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. M. Neves, C. Matos, C. Moutinho, G. Queiroz, and L. R. Gomes, “Ethnopharmacological notes about ancient uses of medicinal plants in Trás-os-Montes (northern of Portugal),” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 270–283, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. D. R. Camacho-Corona, M. A. Ramírez-Cabrera, O. González-Santiago, E. Garza-González, I. D. P. Palacios, and J. Luna-Herrera, “Activity against drug resistant-tuberculosis strains of plants used in Mexican traditional medicine to treat tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 82–85, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Hill and J. Lynch, “Improvements in Health Care,” in: Ireland: society & economy, 1870–1914, http://multitext.ucc.ie/d/Ireland_society__economy_1870-1914. View at: Google Scholar
  25. D. A. Webb, “The flora of Ireland in its European context,” Journal of Life Sciences, Royal Dublin Society, vol. 4, pp. 143–160, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  26. W. Hensel, Medicinal Plants of Britain and Europe, A+C Black, London, UK, 2008.
  27. M. Grieve, A Modern Herbal, Hafner Press, London, UK, 1974.
  28. “Census of Irish seed plants, and corresponding vice-county map of Ireland,” April 2010, http://www.botanicgardens.ie/herb/census/resource.htm. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. E. Allen and G. Hatfield, Medicinal plants in folk tradition, Timber Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  30. F. J. Quinlan, “The Verbascum thapsus,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, pp. 149–150, 1883. View at: Google Scholar
  31. N. Culpeper, Culpeper's Complete Herbal: A Book of Natural Remedies for Ancient Ills, Wordsworth editions, Hertfordshire, UK, 2007.
  32. J. Gerard, Gerard’s Herbal – Or, Generall Historie of Plantes, Read Country Books, Warwickshire, UK, 2008.
  33. J. King, H. W. Felter, and J. U. Lloyd, King's American Dispensatory, Eclectic Medical Publications, Oregon, 1983.
  34. E. Shook, Advanced Treatise in Herbology, Trinity Center Press, Beaumont, Tex, USA, 1978.
  35. L. Johnson, A manual of the medical botany of North America, W. Wood & Company, New York, USA, 1884.
  36. T. A. Sprague, “The Herbal of Otto Brunfels,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 48, pp. 79–147, 1928. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. U. Lloyd and C. G. Lloyd, “Scrophularia. Carpenter’s square. In: Drugs and Medicines of North America, 1884–1887,” April 2010, http://www.henriettesherbal.com/eclectic/dmna/scrophularia.html. View at: Google Scholar
  38. H. Oakley, “Medicines poisons and folklore,” Herbs – The Journal of the Herb Society, vol. 35, pp. 18–21, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  39. C. A. Prior, On the Popular Names of British Plants, Read Country Books, Warwickshire, UK, 2008.
  40. J. Parkinson, Theatrum Botanicum, Thomas Cotes, London, UK, 1640.
  41. J. Cameron, Gaelic Names of Plants, LLC, BiblioBazaar, 2008.
  42. J. Bruton-Seal and M. Seal, Hedgerow Medicine, Merlin Unwin Books, Ludlow, UK, 2009.
  43. E. M. Sarrell, H. A. Cohen, and E. Kahan, “Naturopathic treatment for ear pain in children,” Pediatrics, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. e574–579, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  44. L. Speranza, S. Franceschelli, M. Pesce et al., “Anti-inflammatory properties of the plant Verbascum Mallophorum,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 189–195, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  45. L.-T. Lin, L.-T. Liu, L.-C. Chiang, and C.-C. Lin, “In vitro anti-hepatoma activity of fifteen natural medicines from Canada,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 440–444, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. M. Zanon, F. S. Ceriatti, M. Rovera, L. J. Sabini, and B. A. Ramos, “Search for antiviral activity of certain medicinal plants from Cordoba, Argentina,” Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 59–62, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. Rajbhandari, R. Mentel, P. K. Jha et al., “Antiviral activity of some plants used in nepalese traditional medicine,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, pp. 517–522, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  48. A. R. McCutcheon, T. E. Roberts, E. Gibbons et al., “Antiviral screening of British Columbian medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. U. Turker and N. D. Camper, “Biological activity of common mullein, a medicinal plant,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 82, no. 2-3, pp. 117–125, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. A. Khuroo, M. A. Qureshi, T. K. Razdan, and P. Nichols, “Sterones, iridoids and a sesquiterpene from Verbascum thapsus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 3541–3544, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  51. T. Warashina, T. Miyase, and A. Ueno, “Phenylethanoid and lignan glycosides from Verbascum thapsus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 961–965, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  52. R. Mehrotra, B. Ahmed, R. A. Vishwakarma, and R. S. Thakur, “Verbacoside: a new luteolin glycoside from Verbascum thapsus,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 640–643, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  53. H. Hussain, S. Aziz, G. A. Miana, V. U. Ahmad, S. Anwar, and I. Ahmed, “Minor chemical constituents of Verbascum thapsus,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 124–126, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. Klimek, M. A. Olszewska, and M. Tokar, “Simultaneous determination of flavonoids and phenylethanoids in the flowers of Verbascum densiflorum and V. phlomoides by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Phytochemical Analysis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. H. Abougazar, E. Bedir, I. A. Khan, and I. Çaliş, “Wiedemanniosides A–E: Nnew phenylethanoid glycosides from the roots of Verbascum wiedemannianum,” Planta Medica, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 814–819, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. E. Kalpoutzakis, N. Aligiannis, S. Mitakou, and A.-L. Skaltsounis, “Verbaspinoside, a new iridoid glycoside from Verbascum spinosum,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 342–344, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. R. A. Dixon, “Natural products and plant disease resistance,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6839, pp. 843–847, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Gibbons, “Anti-staphylococcal plant natural products,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–277, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. J. Newman and G. M. Cragg, “Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 461–477, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. L. Okunade, M. P. F. Elvin-Lewis, and W. H. Lewis, “Natural antimycobacterial metabolites: current status,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1017–1032, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. B. R. Copp, “Antimycobacterial natural products,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 535–557, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. M. Newton, C. Lau, and C. W. Wright, “A review of antimycobacterial natural products,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 303–322, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Asres, F. Bucar, S. Edelsbrunner, T. Kartnig, G. Höger, and W. Thiel, “Investigations on antimycobacterial activity of some Ethiopian medicinal plants,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 323–326, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. R. Gautam, A. Saklani, and S. M. Jachak, “Indian medicinal plants as a source of antimycobacterial agents,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 200–234, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. W. C. Evans, Pharmacognosy, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 15th edition, 2002.
  66. B. Dülger, S. Kirmizi, H. Arslan, and G. Güleryüz, “Antimicrobial activity of three endemic Verbascum species,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 587–589, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Ramunno, A. M. Serrilli, F. Piccioni, M. Serafini, and M. Ballero, “Taxonomical markers in two endemic plants of Sardinia: Verbascum conocarpum and Scrophularia trifoliata,” Natural Product Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 511–516, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. K. S. Park, B. H. Kim, and I. -M. Chang, “Inhibitory potencies of several iridoids on cyclooxygenase-1, cyclooxygnase-2 enzymes activities, tumor necrosis factor-α and nitric oxide production in vitro,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. E. Rombout and J. Links, “The chemical nature of the antibacterial substance present in Aucuba japonica Thumb,” Experientia, vol. 123, pp. 78–80, 1956. View at: Google Scholar
  70. E. Davini, C. Javarone, C. Trogolo, P. Aureli, and B. Pasolini, “The quantitative isolation and antimicrobial activity of the aglycone of aucubin,” Phytochemistry, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2420–2422, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  71. D. Rigano, C. Formisano, A. Basile et al., “Antibacterial activity of flavonoids and phenylpropanoids from Marrubium globosum ssp. libanoticum,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 395–397, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. H. Nazemiyeh, M. Shoeb, N. Movahhedin et al., “Phenolic compounds and their glycosides from Stachys schtschegleevii (Lamiaceae),” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 721–723, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. Guillermo Avila, J. G. de Liverant, A. Martínez et al., “Mode of action of Buddleja cordata verbascoside against Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. L. Funes, O. Laporta, M. Cerdán-Calero, and V. Micol, “Effects of verbascoside, a phenylpropanoid glycoside from lemon verbena, on phospholipid model membranes,” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 190–199, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. G. Sparg, M. E. Light, and J. Van Staden, “Biological activities and distribution of plant saponins,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 94, no. 2-3, pp. 219–243, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. H. N. Elsohly, S. Danner, X.-C. Li, A. C. Nimrod, and A. M. Clark, “New antimycobacterial saponin from Colubrina retusa,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1341–1342, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Eibhlín McCarthy and Jim M. O'Mahony. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.