The Effect of Cordycepin on Steroidogenesis and Apoptosis in MA-10
Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

Pan, Bo-Syong; Lin, Chun-Yu; Huang, Bu-Miin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/750468

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 750468 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/750468

The Effect of Cordycepin on Steroidogenesis and Apoptosis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

Bo-Syong Pan,¹Chun-Yu Lin,¹and Bu-Miin Huang¹

Received09 Nov 2010

Revised25 Jan 2011

Accepted30 Mar 2011

Published05 Jun 2011

Abstract

Cordycepin is a natural pure compound extracted from Cordyceps sinensis (CS). We have demonstrated that CS stimulates steroidogenesis in primary mouse Leydig cell and activates apoptosis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. It is highly possible that cordycepin is the main component in CS modulating Leydig cell functions. Thus, our aim was to investigate the steroidogenic and apoptotic effects with potential mechanism of cordycepin on MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Results showed that cordycepin significantly stimulated progesterone production in dose- and time-dependent manners. Adenosine receptor (AR) subtype agonists were further used to treat MA-10 cells, showing that A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃, AR agonists could stimulate progesterone production. However, StAR promoter activity and protein expression remained of no difference among all cordycepin treatments, suggesting that cordycepin might activate AR, but not stimulated StAR protein to regulate MA-10 cell steroidogenesis. Meanwhile, cordycepin could also induce apoptotic cell death in MA-10 cells. Moreover, four AR subtype agonists induced cell death in a dose-dependent manner, and four AR subtype antagonists could all rescue cell death under cordycepin treatment in MA-10 cells. In conclusion, cordycepin could activate adenosine subtype receptors and simultaneously induce steroidogenesis and apoptosis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells.

1. Introduction

Cordyceps sinensis (CS) is an ingredient of traditional Chinese medicine and is prescribed for replenish the kidney and soothe the lung and for the treatment of fatigue [1]. Cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine, an adenosine analogue) is a pure component extracted from the mycelia of CS, and it is well known to possess anticancer ability which induce apoptosis in HeLa cells, oral cancer cells, breast cancer cells, leukemia, and lymphoma cell lines [2–5]. Previous studies demonstrated that CS alone could stimulate steroid production in both normal and tumor mouse Leydig cells [6, 7] and activate apoptosis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells [8]. It is highly possible that cordycepin is the main component in CS modulating Leydig cell functions. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the steroidogenic and apoptotic effects with potential mechanism of cordycepin on MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells.

Steroidogenesis, steroid hormone biosynthesis, occurs mainly in the adrenal glands, brain, placenta, testes, and ovaries [9]. In the male reproduction system, steroidogenesis in Leydig cells is regulated by luteinizing hormone (LH)/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). LH and hCG activate its cognate receptors and coupling to the adenylate cyclase (AC) through the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein (G-protein) [10, 11]. The activated GTP-bound α subunit of G-protein would be able to activate adenylyl cyclase, which results in the hydrolysis of ATP to cyclic AMP. Once cAMP is synthesized, the following activation of protein kinase A (PKA) pathway would phosphorylate steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) [12]. The StAR protein, a 30 kDa phosphoprotein, is the rate-limiting step which delivers cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane [13]. After translocation into mitochondrial, P450 side chain cleave enzyme (P450scc) converts cholesterol to pregnenolone [14]. When pregnenolone is formed, it may be metabolized to progesterone by mitochondrial 3β-hydroxysteriod dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), or it may exit the mitochondria and undergo further metabolism with the final steroid hormone product dependent upon the nature of the tissue [15, 16].

It has been well demonstrated that adenosine acts through four G-protein-coupled membrane receptors, the A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ adenosine receptors [17]. The adenosine A₁ and A₃ receptors (A₁-AR and A₃-AR) inhibit adenylate cyclase via G_i and activate phospholipase C (PLC) [18, 19], and the adenosine A_2A and A_2B receptors (A_2A-AR and A_2B-AR) stimulate adenylyl cyclase via G_s [20, 21], respectively. It is also shown that adenosine appears to induce cell death through apoptosis, whereas ATP appears to cause both necrosis and apoptosis [22].

Although some reports have showed that cordycepin possesses anticancer ability, there is still no research about cordycepin on gonadal steroidogenesis. In fact, we have demonstrated that cordycepin could stimulate testosterone production in normal mouse primary Leydig cells without any phenomenon of cell death [23]. Since the isolation of primary Leydig cell is complicated with very low yield from mouse testis, MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cell line was then used to further examine the regulatory mechanisms regarding the effects of cordycepin. Interestingly, we did find that cordycepin could induce MA-10 cell steroidogenesis and apoptosis. Thus, our objective was to investigate the effect of cordycepin on Leydig cell steroidogenesis and apoptosis with the preliminarily possible mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Cordycepin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), Waymouth MB 752/1 medium, N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethylamino-5′-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine (CGS-21680), 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), N6-(3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA), 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), 8-(3-Chlorostyryl) caffeine (CSC), 8-[4-[((4-Cyanophenyl)carbamoylmethyl)oxy]phenyl]-1,3-di(n-propyl) xanthine (MRS 1754), 3-Ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (MRS 1191), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (10,000 IU per gram) and methylthiazolecterazolium (MTT) were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, mo, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline, lyophilized trypsin-EDTA, and gentamicin sulfate were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sucrose, EDTA, isopropyl alcohol, chloroform, and Tween 20 were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tris base was purchased from Calbiochem (San Deigo, Calif, USA). Acrylamide was purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). HEPES was purchased from Mallinckrodt Baker, Inc. (Paris, USA). Tissue culture grade sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, sodium chloride, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and potassium chloride were purchased from Riedel-deHaen (Seelze, Germany). dNTP and MMLV reverse transcriptase were purchased from Promega (Madison, Wis, USA). Taq was purchased from ABgene (Surrey, UK). Donkey antirabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were purchased from Amersham International (Arlington Heights, Ill, USA). Antibody against β-actin was purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, USA). Antibody against StAR was a generous gift from Dr. Strauss (University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, USA). Charcoal was purchased from Showa Chemical Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). [³H] progesterone used for radioimmunoassay was purchased from Dupont-New England Nuclear (Boston, USA). Antiserum to progesterone was a kind gift from Dr. Paulus S. Wang (National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan).

2.2. Cell Culture

The MA-10 cell line was a gift from Dr. Mario Ascoli (The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA) and is maintained at 37°C in a humidified environment containing 95% air and 5% CO₂ for all the following experiments. MA-10 cells (5 × 10³ cells/100 μL medium) or (6 × 10⁵ cells/2 mL medium) were plated into 96-well plates or 6 cm dish grown for 24 hr in Waymouth medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, respectively. The medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with 1X PBS, and then treated with various concentrations of cordycepin in serum free Waymouth medium for indicated time periods. The cells were then isolated for total protein. The expression of target protein was determined by Western blot analysis. Cytotoxicity assay and cell morphological analysis of the MA-10 cells were determined by MTT assay. The media were withdrawn and progesterone levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. Finally, the adenosine receptor subtypes mRNA expression were performed by RT-PCR.

2.3. Morphology Study

MA-10 cells were seeded in 96-well plate (Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) containing 5 × 10³ cells with 100 μL serum medium in each well. After 70–80% confluence, cells were treated without or with 100 μM and 1 mM cordycepin for 24 hr, respectively. Cell morphology was then observed and recorded under light microscopy (Olympus, CK40). Apoptosis was characterized by the loss of cellular contact with the matrix and the appearance of plasma membrane blebbing.

2.4. MTT Cytotoxicity Assay

Cordycepin-induced MA-10 cells cytotoxicity was determined by measuring mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase activity using a modification of the MTT assay. After MA-10 cells reach 70–80% confluence, cells were treated with serum free medium containing 100 μM and 1 mM cordycepin for indicated time points (24 and 48 hr). MTT was added to wells (0.5 mg/mL final concentration) after time points of culture at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ humidified atmosphere in the presence of the desired reagents. Mitochondrial dehydrogenases of viable cells will convert MTT into a color-dense formazan. Four hours later, the DMSO was added in wells to dissolve the formazan. The DMSO solutions were added and the absorbance was measured at 590 nm by an ELISA reader (VersaMax, MDS Inc., Toronto, Canada).

2.5. DNA Fragmentation Assay

Cells (1 × 10⁶) were lysed in a 0.6 mL cell lysis solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 and 0.3% Triton X-100. DNA was extracted with 0.6 mL phenol/chloroform (1 : 1), and the mixture was centrifuged at 12,500 rpm for 10 min. DNA in the aqueous phase was extracted with phenol/chloroform (1 : 1) again. The aqueous (DNA containing) phase was mixed with isopropanol at −20°C overnight. After centrifugation, DNA pellets were washed with 70% ethanol and air-dried. DNA pellets were dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and RNase A (3 mg/mL) was added to remove RNA at 37°C for 30 min. DNA electrophoresis was carried out in 2% agarose gel. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide. DNA fragments were visualized by exposing the gel to UV light.

2.6. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from MA-10 cells using Trizol reagent as recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif, USA). Reverse transcription was performed in a mixture containing 5 μM random primer, 200 μM dNTP, 2 U/μL MMLV reverse transcriptase together with 5 μL tRNA as the template. The corresponding buffer was performed at 42°C for 90 min followed by 95°C for 10 min. PCR was performed in a mixture containing 2 μL 10X PCR buffer, 0.4 μL 10 mM dNTP, 0.4 μL 20 mM specific forward and reverse primers (primer sequence and corresponding sequence of specific genes were listed in Table 1), 14.7 μL ddH₂O, 0.1 μL 0.5 U Taq with 2 μL RT product as template for each reaction. Thermocontrolling program was set up as the following: denature at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, elongation at 72°C for 30 sec with another 5 min of elongation at 72°C. The whole mixture was subjected to 30 cycles for amplification of L19, 32 cycles for amplification of A₁-AR, 34 cycles for amplification of A_2A-AR and A_2B-AR and 38 cycles for amplification of A₃-AR. The PCR product was then separated on a 1.5% agarose gel at 120 V for 30 min in 1X TBE buffer (0.09 M Tris, 0.09 M boric acid, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0). The gel was then stained with ethidium bromide for 10 min and destained with mili-Q water. The gel image was captured by using Labwork imager system (Digital CCD Camera, Hamamtsu Photonics system, Bridgewater, USA).

2.7. Radioimmunoassay (RIA)

Media from cultures with different treatments were harvested. Twenty μL of sample was loaded into a glass tube and 100 μL each of progesterone antiserum and ³H progesterone were loaded. Equilibrium reaction occurred at 37°C for 30 min and was stopped by putting the tubes in ice. Charcoal was added into the tubes at 4°C for 15 min and centrifuged for 10 min in order to spin down the charcoal-³H progesterone complex. The supernatant was poured into 2 mL of scintillation fluid and samples would be counted in a β-counter (LS 5000TA, Beckman Inc., Fullerton, Calif, USA).

2.8. Immunoblot Analysis

6.0 × 10⁵ cells were cultured in 6 cm dish. After treatment, cells were rinsed with cold PBS. Then, the cells were harvested by 100 μL lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-base, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM Sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM beta-Glycerolphosphate, 1 mM Na₃VO₄). The cell lysate was subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 12 min at 4°C. The supernatant was stored at −20°C until used. The protein concentration was determined by Lowry method [24]. Total proteins were separated in 12.5% SDS-PAGE. Electrophoresis was performed in SDS-PAGE running buffer (24 mM Tris/HCl, 0.19 M glycine, 0.5% SDS, pH 8.3). The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF) in transfer buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, 150 Mm glycine, 10% methanol, 0.05% SDS). The PVDF membrane with protein on it was incubated in blocking buffer (TBS buffer containing 5% Carnation non-fat dry milk and 0.1% Tween-20) at room temperature for an hour. After washing, the membrane would be incubated in primary antibodies StAR at 1 : 2500 dilutions overnight at 4°C. The membrane would be washed three times (10 min each) with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. It was then incubated for an hour at room temperature with fresh blocking buffer containing the secondary antibody, antirabbit IgG. The membrane was washed and the signal detected by using the Renaissance chemiluminescence reagent. The desired protein was quantitated by UVP EC3 Imaging System (Upland, Calif, USA). The amount of β-actin in each lane was detected and quantified as well in order to normalize the expression of target protein.

2.9. Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assays

The 5′-flanking regions (−1278/+32) of the mouse StAR gene were cloned into the pGL3 basic vector (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis, USA), upstream of a luciferase reporter gene utilizing the XhoI and HindIII sites. The plasmid pSV-Galactosidase control vector (Promega Corp.) was used to normalize transfection efficiency. Plasmids were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen 11668-019, Invitrogen Corp., Calif, USA). In brief, 1.2 × 10⁵ cells/500 μL medium were cultured in either 24-well plates to 65–75% confluency and transfected using 0.5 μg of plasmid in the presence of 0.5 μg of pSV-Galactosidase control vector. After 6 hr of transfection, MA-10 cells were followed by rising and incubation in serum-free Waymouth medium for 18 hr. After medium was changed, cells were then treated with cordycepin for another 12 hr. Luciferase assays were performed using the Luciferase Reporter Assay System according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis, USA). Briefly, after treatment cells were washed with 1X PBS and 200 μL of the 1X passive lysis buffer (Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System, Promega E1910, Promega Corp., Madison, Wis, USA) was added to the plates. The cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 ×g at 4°C, and the 20 μL supernatant was measured for 50 μL Luciferase Assay Buffer (Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System, Promega E1910, Promega Corp., Madison, Wis, USA) in a MiniLumat Luminometer (Turner Designs Corp., Sunnyvale, Calif, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Each data point in the figures represents the mean ± SEM of three or four separate experiments. Statistically significant differences between treatments and controls were determined by one-way ANOVA and then least significance difference (LSD) or with -test comparison procedure. Statistical significance was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Cordycepin on Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

To test the hypothesis that cordycepin influences the production of steroid hormone in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells; we initially determined the effect of cordycepin on the production of progesterone. MA-10 cells were incubated with different dosages (1, 10, 100 μM, and 1 mM) of cordycepin for 24 hr. Results showed that the progesterone production induced by 100 μM cordycepin was more than 3 folds significantly compared to the control (217.5 ± 101.7 versus 675.9 ± 185.4 pg/μg protein; ) (Figure 1(a)). As shown in Figure 1(b), cordycepin at 100 μM significantly stimulated progesterone to a maximum at 24 hr (). According to the results, 100 μM cordycepin for 24 hr treatment was used to investigate the possible cellular mechanism.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

Dose- and time-course effects of cordycepin on steroidogenesis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells (5000 cells/well) were treated with 1, 10, 100 μM and 1 mM cordycepin for 24 hr (a); and MA-10 cells were treated with 100 μM cordycepin for 0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hr (b), respectively. Treatment of hCG (1 IU) was used as a positive control. Media were collected and assayed for progesterone production by RIA. Each data point in the figure represents the mean the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with triplicates in each treatment. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control.

3.2. RT-PCR Analysis for Detection of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ Adenosine Receptor mRNA Transcripts in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

It has been reported that cordycepin could inhibit lung carcinoma and melanoma cell growth by stimulating A₃-AR [25, 26]. We hypothesized for the presence of functional adenosine receptor subtypes that involved in cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis in MA-10 cells. Thus, mRNA expressions of all four AR subtypes, A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃, with cordycepin treatment in MA-10 cells were analyzed by RT-PCR. The results showed that cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) could change the mRNA expression among four AR subtypes (Figure 2(a)). The normalized results showed that the treatment of 1 mM cordycepin for 24 hr upregulated the expression of A1-AR mRNA for about 1.5 fold () (Figure 2(b)). Cordycepin (1 mM) upregulated the expression of A_2A-AR mRNA for about 2 folds () (Figure 2(c)). Cordycepin at 1 mM would also upregulate the expression of A₃-AR mRNA for about 3 folds () (Figure 2(e)). However, both 100 μM and 1 mM cordycepin would downregulate A_2B-AR mRNA expression by 60% and 80%, respectively () (Figure 2(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

Characterization of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR mRNA expression in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells (1× 10⁶) were cultured in Waymouth medium to 80% confluence, and then the total RNA were extracted and the expression of adenosine receptor subtypes mRNA were analyzed by RT-PCR. (a) shows A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR mRNA expression in response to cordycepin at different dosages (100 μM and 1 mM) for 24 hr. L19 is the housekeeping gene used as an internal control. (b) shows the integrated optical density (IOD) of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR mRNA expression after normalization with L19. Each data point in the figure represents the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control.

3.3. A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

By using AR agonists (1~100 μM) to treat MA-10 cells for 24 hr, the results showed that A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR agonists could stimulate progesterone production in MA-10 mouse Leydig cells () (Figures 3(a)–3(d)). Compared to the control, A₁-AR agonist could significantly stimulate progesterone production and reach 4.1 folds by 100 μM CPA () (Figure 3(a)). A_2A-AR agonist could significantly stimulate progesterone production and reach 6.8 and 7.9 folds by 10 and 25 μM CGS-21680, respectively, () (Figure 3(b)). A_2B-AR agonist could significantly stimulate progesterone production and reach 7.6, 8.9, and 9.8 folds by 1, 10, and 100 μM NECA, respectively, () (Figure 3(c)). A₃-AR agonist could significantly stimulate progesterone production and reach 10.5 and 24.7 folds by 10 and 50 μM IB-ECA, respectively () (Figure 3(d)). On the other hand, cordycepin (100 μM) cotreated with A₁-AR agonist would significantly decrease CPA-stimulated (100 μM) progesterone production by 47% () (Figure 3(a)). Cordycepin (100 μM) cotreated with A_2B-AR agonist would significantly decrease NECA-stimulated (1, 10 and 100 μM) progesterone production by 70%, 69%, and 47%, respectively, () (Figure 3(c)). Cordycepin (100 μM) cotreated with A₃-AR agonist would significantly decrease IB-MECA (50 μM)-stimulated progesterone production by 33% () (Figure 3(d)). However, cordycepin (100 μM) cotreated with A_2A-AR agonist would not affect CGS-21680-stimulated progesterone production () (Figure 3(b)). These results demonstrated that cordycepin could regulate AR subtype expressions to stimulate progesterone production in MA-10 cells. To further understand the mechanism of functional AR subtypes that involved in the cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells, selective A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR subtype antagonists (10 nM~1 μM) were used to cotreat with cordycepin for 24 hr. The results showed that A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR antagonists did not have inhibitory effect on cordycepin-induced progesterone production in MA-10 cells () (Figures 4(a)–4(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3

A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR are involved in cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis. MA-10 cells (5000 cells/well) were treated with different dosage (1~100 μM) of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR agonists, which were (a) CPA, (b) CGS-21680, (c) NECA, and (d) IB-MECA in the absence or presence of 100 μM cordycepin for 24 hr. Media were collected and assayed for progesterone production by RIA. Each data point in the figure represents the mean the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with triplicates in each treatment. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

Effects of AR antagonists on cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells (5,000 cells/well) were treated with different dosage (10 nM~1 μM) of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR antagonists, which were (a) DPCPX, (b) Caffeine, (c) MRS-1754, and (d) MRS-1191 in the absence or presence of 100 μM cordycepin for 24 hr. Media were collected and assayed for progesterone production by RIA. Each data point in the figure represents the mean the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with triplicates in each treatment. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control.

3.4. Effects of Cordycepin on StAR Protein and Promoter Expressions in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

It has been previously shown that steroidogenesis induced by Cordycep sinensis in MA-10 cells requires de novo protein synthesis [27]. To further understand the mechanism of cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis in MA-10 cells, StAR protein expression was investigated by Western blotting analysis. MA-10 cells were incubated with different dosages (1~100 μM) of cordycepin for 3 hr or 100 μM cordycepin for 1, 3, 6, and 12 hr, respectively. Results showed that the expression of StAR protein was not activated by cordycepin with different dosages (Figure 5(a)) and different time treatments (Figure 5(b)) in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells ().

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5

Effects of cordycepin on the expression of StAR protein and StAR promoter activity in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells were treated with 1, 10, and 100 μM cordycepin for 3 hr (a); and MA-10 cells were treated with 100 μM cordycepin for 1, 3, 6, and 12 hr (b), respectively. Treatment of hCG (1 IU) was used as a positive control. The expression of StAR (30 kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa) detected by Western blotting. Quantitative analyses of the levels of StAR and β-actin (a, b) are shown. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control. Serial deletion constructs of the StAR promoter were transiently transfected into MA-10 cells (c). The promoter activity was calculated by dividing firefly signals to Renilla signals. Each data point in the figure represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

In addition, MA-10 cells were transiently transfected with plasmid containing luciferase gene with 5′-flanking StAR promoter constructs between −1.3 k to +32 regions, and cordycepin (100 μM) was added for 12 hr treatment. Results of 5′-deletion promoter analysis indicated that cordycepin did not increase StAR promoter activity () (Figure 5(c)). Taken together, these results suggest that StAR protein and StAR promoter might not be involved in the cordycepin-induced steroidogenesis in MA-10 cells.

3.5. Effects of Cordycepin and Adenosine on Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

According to our previous studies, cordycepin has antitumor activity in OECM-1 oral cancer and MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cell lines [3, 28]. We hypothesized that cordycepin, an adenosine analogue, might act through AR to induce cell death in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Thus, the death effects of cordycepin and adenosine on MA-10 cell line was investigated by culturing MA-10 cells with different dosage of adenosine (10 μM~10 mM) and cordycepin (100 μM~1 mM) for comparison. MTT assay showed that 1, 2, 5, and 10 mM adenosine significantly decreased MA-10 cell viability to 78%, 65%, 43%, and 39% (), and cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) significantly decreased MA-10 cell viability to 44% and 13% () for 48 hr treatment, respectively (Figure 6(a)). DNA fragmentation was also observed in the MA-10 cells with 10 mM adenosine after 48 hr treatment (Figure 6(b)). The results are comparable regarding the cell death effects between cordycepin and adenosine on MA-10 cells.

(a)

(b)

Figure 6

Effects of cordycepin and adenosine on cell death in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells were cultured in medium without or with adenosine (10 μM~10 mM), 100 μM and 1 mM cordycepin for 48 hr (a). MTT assay was performed to assess cell viability. Data represent the mean ± SEM of four separate experiments. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control. (cordy. = cordycepin). (b) Gel electrophoresis of a 1 kb DNA ladder marker (lane M) or DNA isolated from MA-10 cells that were cultured in the presence of 10 mM adenosine for 48 hr. DNA was visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed under UV illumination. Experiments were performed four times (Exp. I–IV) with similar results.

3.6. A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

Previous data demonstrate that expressions of AR subtypes, A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ mRNA are found in MA-10 cells, and their expression could be modulated by the presence of cordycepin. To investigate whether cordycepin-induced apoptosis was mediated via adenosine receptors on MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells, cells were treated with A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR agonists (CPA, CGS-21680, NECA and IB-MECA) for 24 hr, respectively. Results show that some MA-10 cells appeared rounded-up phenomenon with floating and membrane-blebbing after 24 hr cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) treatment (Figure 7(a)). In addition, MA-10 cells treated with A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR agonists (100 μM, 25 μM, 100 μM, and 50 μM, resp.) for 24 hr also induced cells to have rounded-up phenomenon with floating cells (Figure 7(b)). Cotreatment of cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) with A₁-, A_2A-, and A_2B-agonists (100 μM, 25 μM, and 100 μM, resp.) for 24 hr induced cells to have rounded-up phenomenon with floating and membrane-blebbing. Interestingly, A₃-AR agonist (50 μM) cotreated with cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) for 24 hr would let some MA-10 cell recover back to polygonal shape, which was similar to the control group (Figure 7(c)). MTT cytotoxicity assay was further employed to assess cell viability (Figure 7(d)). Compared to the control, A₁-AR agonist, CPA, at 100 μM caused a significant reduction in cell viability to 73.8 ± 5.2% (). A_2A-AR agonist, CGS-21680, at 10 μM and 25 μM caused a significant reduction in cell viability to 84.9 ± 2.4% and 78.4 ± 4.0%, respectively (). A_2B-AR agonist, NECA, at 10 μM and 100 μM caused significant reductions in cell viability to 82.9 ± 1.5% and 72.9 ± 2.6%, respectively (). A₃-AR agonist, IB-MECA, at 50 μM caused a significant reduction in cell viability to 75.7 ± 2.4% (). These results showed that A1-, A_2A-, A_2B- , and A3-AR agonists significantly reduced MA-10 cell viability, respectively (Figure 7(d)) (). Besides, cordycepin alone (100 μM and 1 mM) significantly decreased MA-10 cell viability approximately to 60% and 40%, respectively, after 24 hr treatment (Figure 7(e)) (). However, A₁-, A_2A- , and A_2B-AR agonists plus cordycepin treatments did not have any additive effects on MA-10 cell death, respectively (Figure 7(e)) (). But, A₃-AR agonist (50 μM) cotreated with cordycepin (100 μM or 1 mM) would reverse MA-10 cell viability back to 81.6 ± 9.6% or 61.6 ± 7.8%, respectively (Figure 7(e)). These results showed that A₁- , A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR might be very important regarding the antitumor effects of cordycepin in MA-10 cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 7

A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR were involved in cordycepin-induced cell death in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells were treated with A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR agonists in the absence or presence of cordycepin for 24 hr. (a) shows that MA-10 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) for 24 hr. (b) shows that MA-10 cells were incubated in AR agonists (A₁ 100 μM, A_2A 25 μM, A_2B 100 μM, and A₃ 50 μM) for 24 hr. (c) shows that MA-10 cells were incubated in cordycepin (100 μM or 1 mM) plus AR agonists (A₁ 10 μM, A_2A 10 μM, A_2B 10 μM, and A₃ 50 μM) for 24 hr. Cell morphology was observed and recorded under light microscopy (Olympus, CK 40). Note the same magnification (200x) among Figures. Arrowhead (▲) indicates rounded-up cells and/or membrane-blebbed cells. MA-10 cells (5,000 cells/well) were treated with different dosages (1~100 μM) of A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR agonist in the absence (d) or presence of cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) for 24 hr (e). MTT assay was used to assess cell viability, which was proportional to absorbance at 590 nm. Each data point in the Figure represents the mean the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments with triplicates in each treatment. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control. ^#() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with cordycepin alone treatment group (C: cordycepin).

3.7. AR Antagonists Could Prevent Cordycepin-Induced Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

In order to confirm whether cordycepin-induced apoptosis was mediated via AR on MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells, cells were treated with cordycepin (100 μM and 1 mM) plus A₁- , A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR antagonists (DPCPX, Caffeine, MRS1754 and MRS1191) for 24 hr, respectively. All A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B , and A₃-AR antagonists could let cordycepin-treated MA-10 cells recover back to polygonal shape, which is similar to the cells in control group (Figure 8(a)). In MTT assay, the cotreatment of 100 μM cordycepin with 1 μM A₁- , A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR antagonists could also significantly reverse cell viability to 90.6% ± 3.8%, 89.2% ± 4.8%, 86.7% ± 1.9% and 83.3% ± 5.7%., respectively () (Figure 8(b)). However, the cotreatment of 1 mM cordycepin with A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR antagonists did not reverse cell viability (Figure 8(c)). These results indicate that the apoptotic effects of cordycepin on MA-10 cells could be mediated by adenosine receptors.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 8

Effects of AR antagonists on cordycepin-induced cell death in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. MA-10 cells were treated with different adenosine receptor antagonists in the absence or presence of cordycepin for 24 hr. (a) shows that MA-10 cells were incubated in cordycepin (100 μM or 1 mM) plus 1 μM selective AR antagonists for 24 hr. Cell morphology was observed and recorded under light microscopy (Olympus, CK 40). Note the same magnificantion (200×) among Figures. Arrowhead (▲) indicate rounded-up cells and/or membrane-blebbed cells. MA-10 cells (5,000 cells/well) were treated with different dosages (1~100 μM) of A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR antagonists in the presence of 100 μM (b) or 1 mM (c) cordycepin for 24 hr. MTT assay was used to assess cell viability, which was proportional to absorbance at 590 nm. Each data point in the Figure represents the mean the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments with triplicates in each treatment. Asterisk *() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with control. ^#() above the bars indicates significant difference compared with cordycepin alone treatment group (C: cordycepin).

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that cordycepin, a pure substance isolated from the Cordyceps sinensis, could stimulate steroidogenesis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Besides, cordycepin could induce the antitumor effect possibly through adenosine receptors in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells.

First, we found that cordycepin increased the expression of A₁-, A_2A-, and A₃-AR mRNA but decreased the expression of A_2B-AR mRNA at 24 hr treatment. Under microscopic observation, we found that cordycepin-treated MA-10 cells exhibited cellular shrinkage and membrane blebbing, and finally cells detached from the dish. By MTT and DNA ladder assays, adenosine also significantly reduced MA-10 cell viability in a dose-dependent manner and induced DNA fragmentation. The effective concentration (EC50) of adenosine which could cause 50% inhibition of MA-10 cells growth was 5 mM after 48 hr treatment. However, we observed that the death effect of cordycepin was somewhat greater than adenosine in the same concentration (100 μM and 1 mM). These phenomena indicate that the apoptotic effect by adenosine in MA-10 cells was comparable.

Nakamura and coworkers have demonstrated that cordycepin inhibited lung carcinoma cells and melanoma cells growth by stimulating A₃-AR [25, 26]. Many evidences have also illustrated that A₁- and A_2A-AR expression mediated cell death by inducing apoptosis in breast carcinoma cells, astrocytoma cells, mouse thymocytes [29–31]. In this study, we showed that cordycepin could significantly stimulate the expression of A₃-AR mRNA in cordycepin-treated MA-10 cells. Moreover, this effect also occurred in A₁-AR and A_2A-AR mRNA expressions. In addition, we also demonstrated that cordycepin induced MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cell apoptosis through caspase-9 and caspase-3 pathways [28]. These data suggested that AR might participate in cordycepin-induced apoptosis pathway in MA-10 mouse Leydig cells.

We continued to investigate the AR agonists to cotreat with cordycepin in MA-10 cells. We found that A₃-AR agonists could significantly rescue cordycepin-induced apoptosis in MA-10 cells. Many reports indicate that adenosine displays contradictory effects such as the induction of cell apoptosis or stimulation of cell proliferation [32, 33]. It has been reported that the A₃-AR agonist (CL-IB-MECA) reduced apoptosis in human astroglioma D384 cells [34]. In fact, some evidences have shown that adenosine via A₁-AR- and A₃-AR-mediated cytoprotection involves phospholipase C, PKC, and p38 MAPK pathways, and reduced ROS production in cardiomyocytes [35–37]. In this study, we demonstrated that activation of AR would induce apoptosis in MA-10 cells. However, activation of different subtypes of AR could trigger apoptosis/survival pathway in MA-10 cells, which must be further investigated.

Recent reports demonstrated that adenosine receptor antagonists can resume cell viability on toxicant drug-induced apoptosis in thyroid cancer cells [38, 39]. We used the selective AR antagonists to cotreat with cordycepin in MA-10 cells. We also demonstrated that A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B- , and A₃-AR antagonist could significantly rescue 100 μM cordycepin-induced apoptosis in MA-10 cells. These results indicate that the apoptotic effects of cordycepin on MA-10 cells could be mediated by AR. However, 1 mM cordycepin cotreated with adenosine antagonists could not reverse cell viability, but even promote cell death. Recent developments of potent and selective antagonists of AR subtypes have been valuable for further defining the physiological effects of the various AR subtypes. Moreover, there are substantial species differences in the affinity of these compounds, and these selective compounds may fairly potent as antagonists of another AR subtypes [40].

It has been shown that adenosine-stimulated steroidogenesis might be involved in the A_2A- and A_2B-AR and phosphorylation of MAPK ERK 1/2 signal pathway in rat adrenal cells [41]. Moreover, it is proposed that ligand binding results in a change in receptor state from an inactive to an active state will ultimately elicit its biological response based on the receptor’s conformation [42]. In this model, agonists are thought to have selective binding affinity for the preexisting resting and active states or can induce a conformational change to a different receptor state and effects binding affinity of a ligand [43]. In the present study, cordycepin cotreated with A_2B-AR agonist (NECA) would significantly decrease NECA-stimulated progesterone production. It is probable that cordycepin may bind with other receptors and induce conformation change to effect binding affinity of A_2B-AR agonist. This result is consistent with the observation that cordycepin (100 μM) decreased the expression of A_2B-AR mRNA at 24 hr treatment. Although cordycepin (100 μM) did not affect the expression of A₁- and A₃-AR mRNA, cordycepin cotreated with A₁- and A₃-AR agonist (CPA and IB-MECA) also significantly decreased their progesterone production. On the other hand, cordycepin did not affect the A_2A-AR agonist (CGS-21680)-stimulated progesterone production. It is reasonable that cordycepin may compete with CGS-21680 in the same biding site of A_2A-AR to stimulate progesterone production. Here, we demonstrated that activation of A₁-, A_2A-, A_2B-, and A₃-AR could induce steroidogenesis in MA-10. However, we used the AR antagonists to cotreat with cordycepin, and results illustrated huge variations. AR antagonists only slightly increased progesterone production than control group in MA-10 cells, which may decrease the accuracy. More experiments should be conducted to decrease the inconsistence.

Steroid production in Leydig and granulosa cells are regulated by various factors, including cAMP/PKA-dependent [44], mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (MAPK ERK 1/2) [45, 46], and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways [47, 48]. These kinases modulate cellular processes by phosphorylations. The family of MAPKs includes extracellular regulating kinase (ERK), c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38, with each MAPK signaling pathway consisting of at least three components, a MAPK kinase kinase (MAP3k), a MAPK kinase (MAP2k), and a MAPK. Some reports have shown the stimulatory effects of MAPK ERK 1/2 on steroidogenesis [49, 50], and the others have demonstrated the inhibitory effects on steroidogenesis [51, 52]. PKC signaling pathway can be activated by signals such as increases in the concentration of diacylglyceride (DAG), phospholipase C (PLC), or Ca²⁺ [53]. Recent reports indicate that DAX-1 gene interplay between the PKA/PKC signaling pathways and represses expression of StAR protein and steroidogenesis [54].

It is well established that StAR protein is essential for steroidogenesis, and that ERK 1/2 phosphorylation driven by mitochondrial PKA will induce StAR protein expression and then steroidogenesis [46]. The previous data showed that cordycepin upregulates the expression of StAR mRNA and StAR protein to induce steroidogenesis through the PKA signaling pathway in normal mouse Leydig cells [55]. It has also been documented that the downstream effectors of PKA signaling pathway include several transcription factors [56]. However, our results indicated that cordycepin could not induce StAR protein and StAR promoter expressions in MA-10 cells. Our data are somewhat inconsistent to several studies that steroidogenesis could be trigger by cAMP and StAR-independent pathways [57–59]. Therefore, it is possible that the cordycepin could possibly acitvate MAPK-ERK 1/2 and PKC pathways without increasing of StAR promoter and StAR protein expression to induce steroidogenesis in MA-10 cells, which will be worth to further investigate.

In conclusion, the present studies demonstrate that cordycepin is one of the active constituent of Cordyceps sinensis, which can stimulate progesterone production in MA-10 cells. Meanwhile, cordycepin could also activate AR and simultaneously induce steroidogenesis and apoptosis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Science Council Grants NSC98-2320-B-006-016 (to B.-M. Huang), Taiwan.

References

X. Zhou, Z. Gong, Y. Su, J. Lin, and K. Tang, “Cordyceps fungi: natural products, pharmacological functions and developmental products,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 279–291, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Q. He, J. Li, and D. Y. Cheng, “Effect of cordycepin on apoptosis and cell cycle in HeLa cells,” Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 258–259, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
W. C. Wu, J. R. Hsiao, Y. Y. Lian, C. Y. Lin, and B. M. Huang, “The apoptotic effect of cordycepin on human OEC-M1 oral cancer cell line,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 103–111, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Thomadaki, C. M. Tsiapalis, and A. Scorilas, “Polyadenylate polymerase modulations in human epithelioid cervix and breast cancer cell lines, treated with etoposide or cordycepin, follow cell cycle rather than apoptosis induction,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 386, no. 5, pp. 471–480, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Thomadaki, A. Scorilas, C. M. Tsiapalis, and M. Havredaki, “The role of cordycepin in cancer treatment via induction or inhibition of apoptosis: implication of polyadenylation in a cell type specific manner,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 251–265, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Huang, S. F. Leu, B. C. Liu, C. C. Sheu, and B. M. Huang, “In vivo stimulatory effect of Cordyceps sinensis mycelium and its fractions on reproductive functions in male mouse,” Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1051–1062, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. C. Chen, Y. L. Huang, and B. M. Huang, “Cordyceps sinensis mycelium activates PKA and PKC signal pathways to stimulate steroidogenesis in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 214–223, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Yang, S. F. Leu, Y. K. Wang, C. S. Wu, and B. M. Huang, “Cordyceps sinensis mycelium induces MA-10 mouse leydig tumor cell apoptosis by activating the caspase-8 pathway and suppressing the NF-κB pathway,” Archives of Andrology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. K. Ghayee and R. J. Auchus, “Basic concepts and recent developments in human steroid hormone biosynthesis,” Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 289–300, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Martinat, P. Crépieux, E. Reiter, and F. Guillou, “Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) 1,2 are required for luteinizing hormone (LH)-induced steroidogenesis in primary Leydig cells and control steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) expression,” Reproduction Nutrition Development, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Manna, J. Kero, M. Tena-Sempere, P. Pakarinen, D. M. Stocco, and I. T. Huhtaniemi, “Assessment of mechanisms of thyroid hormone action in mouse Leydig cells: regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, steroidogenesis, and luteinizing hormone receptor function,” Endocrinology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 319–331, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Arakane, T. Sugawara, H. Nishino et al., “Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) retains activity in the absence of its mitochondrial import sequence: implications for the mechanism of StAR action,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 24, pp. 13731–13736, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Stocco, “Tracking the role of a StAR in the sky of the new millennium,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1245–1254, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Stocco, “The role of the StAR protein in steroidogenesis: challenges for the future,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 247–253, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Cherradi, G. Defaye, and E. M. Chambaz, “Characterization of the 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity associated with bovine adrenocortical mitochondria,” Endocrinology, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 1358–1364, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sulimovici, B. Bartoov, and B. Lunenfeld, “Localization of 3 β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the inner membrane subfraction of rat testis mitochondria,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 1973.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Fredholm, G. Arslan, L. Halldner, B. Kull, G. Schulte, and W. Wasserman, “Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 362, no. 4-5, pp. 364–374, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Reppert, D. R. Weaver, J. H. Stehle, and S. A. Rivkees, “Molecular cloning and characterization of a rat A-adenosine receptor that is widely expressed in brain and spinal cord,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1037–1048, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Y. Zhou, C. Li, M. E. Olah, R. A. Johnson, G. L. Stiles, and O. Civelli, “Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A3 adenosine receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 16, pp. 7432–7436, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Rivkees and S. M. Reppert, “RFL9 encodes an A(2b)-adenosine receptor,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1598–1604, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Stehle, S. A. Rivkees, J. J. Lee, D. R. Weaver, J. D. Deeds, and S. M. Reppert, “Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for a novel A-adenosine receptor subtype,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 384–393, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Chow, G. E. N. Kass, and S. Orrenius, “Purines and their roles in apoptosis,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1149–1156, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Leu, S. L. Poon, H. Y. Pao, and B. M. Huang, “The in vivo and in vitro stimulatory effects of cordycepin on mouse Leydig cell steroidogenesis,” Bioscience Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 723–731, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” The The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Nakamura, N. Yoshikawa, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Kagota, K. Shinozuka, and M. Kunitomo, “Antitumor effect of cordycepin ( $3^{'}$ -deoxyadenosine) on mouse melanoma and lung carcinoma cells involves adenosine A3 receptor stimulation,” Anticancer Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Yoshikawa, S. Yamada, C. Takeuchi et al., “Cordycepin ( $3^{'}$ -deoxyadenosine) inhibits the growth of B16-BL6 mouse melanoma cells through the stimulation of adenosine A3 receptor followed by glycogen synthase kinase-3β activation and cyclin D1 suppression,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 377, no. 4–6, pp. 591–595, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Huang, S. Y. Ju, C. S. Wu, W. J. Chuang, C. C. Sheu, and S. F. Leu, “Cordyceps sinensis and its fractions stimulate MA-10 mouse leydig tumor cell steroidogenesis,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 831–837, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
B. M. Huang, C. Y. Jen, C. Y. Lin, and S. F. Leu, “Cordycepin induced MA-10 mouse leydig tumor cell apoptosis through caspase-9 pathway,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 984537, 11 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mirza, A. Basso, S. Black et al., “RNA interference targeting of A1 receptor-overexpressing breast carcinoma cells leads to diminished rates of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1355–1360, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Kiss, H. Oskolás, R. Tóth et al., “Adenosine A receptor-mediated cell death of mouse thymocytes involves adenylate cyclase and Bim and is negatively regulated by Nur77,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1559–1571, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sai, D. Yang, H. Yamamoto et al., “A adenosine receptor signal and AMPK involving caspase-9/-3 activation are responsible for adenosine-induced RCR-1 astrocytoma cell death,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 458–467, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Saito, T. Yaguchi, Y. Yasuda, T. Nakano, and T. Nishizaki, “Adenosine suppresses CW2 human colonic cancer growth by inducing apoptosis via A adenosine receptors,” Cancer Letters, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 211–215, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Fishman, S. Bar-Yehuda, T. Farbstein, F. Barer, and G. Ohana, “Adenosine acts as a chemoprotective agent by stimulating G-CSF production: a role for A1 and A3 adenosine receptors,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 393–398, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Björklund, M. Shang, I. Tonazzini, E. Daré, and B. B. Fredholm, “Adenosine A and A receptors protect astrocytes from hypoxic damage,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 596, no. 1–3, pp. 6–13, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Fenton, L. G. Shea, C. Doddi, and J. G. Dobson, “Myocardial adenosine A-receptor-mediated adenoprotection involves phospholipase C, PKC-ε, and p38 MAPK, but not HSP27,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 298, no. 6, pp. H1671–H1678, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Xiang, Y. S. Huang, D. X. Zhang, Z. G. Chu, J. P. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, “Adenosine A receptor activation reduces opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores in hypoxic cardiomyocytes,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Zhao and R. C. Kukreja, “Protein kinase C-δ mediates adenosine A receptor-induced delayed cardioprotection in mouse,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. H434–H441, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Morello, R. Sorrentino, A. Porta et al., “Cl-IB-MECA enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis via the modulation of NF-κB signalling pathway in thyroid cancer cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 378–386, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Simonis, S. Wiedemann, D. Joachim, C. Weinbrenner, R. Marquetant, and R. H. Strasser, “Stimulation of adenosine A2b receptors blocks apoptosis in the non-infarcted myocardium even when administered after the onset of infarction,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 328, no. 1-2, pp. 119–126, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Linden, “Molecular approach to adenosine receptors: receptor-mediated mechanisms of tissue protection,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 41, pp. 775–787, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, J. Li, S. Qiu, J. Chen, and Y. Zheng, “Effects of the exopolysaccharide fraction (EPSF) from a cultivated Cordyceps sinensis on immunocytes of H22 tumor bearing mice,” Fitoterapia, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 168–173, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Black and P. Leff, “Operational models of pharmacological agonism,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 220, no. 1219, pp. 141–162, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
H. P. Rang, “The receptor concept: pharmacology's big idea,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 147, no. 1, supplement, pp. S9–S16, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Dyson, M. P. Kowalewski, P. R. Manna, and D. M. Stocco, “The differential regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-mediated steroidogenesis by type I and type II PKA in MA-10 cells,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 300, no. 1-2, pp. 94–103, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Lin, C. C. Tsai, C. L. Chung et al., “Fibroblast growth factor 9 stimulates steroidogenesis in postnatal Leydig cells,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 545–553, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Poderoso, P. Maloberti, A. Duarte et al., “Hormonal activation of a kinase cascade localized at the mitochondria is required for StAR protein activity,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 300, no. 1-2, pp. 37–42, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Manna, S. P. Chandrala, S. R. King et al., “Molecular mechanisms of insulin-like growth factor-I mediated regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in mouse leydig cells,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 362–378, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jo, S. R. King, S. A. Khan, and D. M. Stocco, “Involvement of protein kinase C and cyclic adenosine $3^{'}$ , $5^{'}$ - monophosphate-dependent kinase in steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression and steroid biosynthesis in Leydig cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 244–255, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Gyles, C. J. Burns, B. J. Whitehouse et al., “ERKs Regulate Cyclic AMP-induced Steroid Synthesis through Transcription of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory (StAR) Gene,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 37, pp. 34888–34895, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Das, E. T. Maizels, D. Demanno, E. S. T. Clair, S. A. Adam, and M. Hunzicker-Dunn, “A stimulatory role of cyclic adenosine $3^{'}$ , $5^{'}$ -monophosphate in follicle-stimulating hormone-activated mitogen-activated protein Kinase signaling pathway in rat ovarian granulosa cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 967–974, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Seger, T. Hanoch, R. Rosenberg et al., “The ERK Signaling Cascade Inhibits Gonadotropin-stimulated Steroidogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 17, pp. 13957–13964, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Tajima, A. Dantes, Z. Yao et al., “Down-regulation of steroidogenic response to gonadotropins in human and rat preovulatory granulosa cells involves mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and modulation of DAX-1 and steroidogenic factor-1,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 2288–2299, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Newton, “Protein kinase C: poised to signal,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 298, no. 3, pp. E395–E402, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Manna, M. T. Dyson, Y. Jo, and D. M. Stocco, “Role of dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, critical region on the x chromosome, gene 1 in protein kinase a- and protein kinase c-mediated regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression in mouse leydig tumor cells: mechanism of action,” Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 187–199, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Hsu, S. J. Tsai, Y. L. Huang, and B. M. Huang, “Regulatory mechanism of Cordyceps sinensis mycelium on mouse Leydig cell steroidogenesis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 543, no. 1–3, pp. 140–143, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Sands and T. M. Palmer, “Regulating gene transcription in response to cyclic AMP elevation,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 460–466, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. O. Lukyanenko, A. M. Carpenter, D. E. Brigham, D. M. Stocco, and J. C. Hutson, “Regulation of Leydig cells through a steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-independent pathway by a lipophilic factor from macrophages,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 267–275, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. King, A. A. Matassa, E. K. White et al., “Oxysterols regulate expression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein,” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 507–517, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Gunnarsson, P. Leffler, E. Ekwurtzel, G. Martinsson, K. Liu, and G. Selstam, “Mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate stimulates basal steroidogenesis by a cAMP-independent mechanism in mouse gonadal cells of both sexes,” Reproduction, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 693–703, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Bo-Syong Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1979

Downloads

1123

Citations

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

The Effect of Cordycepin on Steroidogenesis and Apoptosis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

2.2. Cell Culture

2.3. Morphology Study

2.4. MTT Cytotoxicity Assay

2.5. DNA Fragmentation Assay

2.6. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

2.7. Radioimmunoassay (RIA)

2.8. Immunoblot Analysis

2.9. Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assays

2.10. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Cordycepin on Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.2. RT-PCR Analysis for Detection of A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 Adenosine Receptor mRNA Transcripts in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.3. A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.4. Effects of Cordycepin on StAR Protein and Promoter Expressions in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.5. Effects of Cordycepin and Adenosine on Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.6. A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.7. AR Antagonists Could Prevent Cordycepin-Induced Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

4. Discussion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

3.2. RT-PCR Analysis for Detection of A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ Adenosine Receptor mRNA Transcripts in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.3. A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

3.6. A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ AR Were Involved in Cordycepin-Induced Cell Death in MA-10 Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells