Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 818230 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/818230

Antirheumatoid Arthritis Activities and Chemical Compositions of Phenolic Compounds-Rich Fraction from Urtica atrichocaulis, an Endemic Plant to China

Academic Editor: Ann Gill Taylor
Received25 Apr 2011
Revised20 Jun 2011
Accepted29 Jun 2011
Published22 Aug 2011


Urtica atrichocaulis, an endemic plant to China, is commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis even though its pharmaceutical activities and chemical constituents were not studied. Herein, we reported our investigations on the chemical compositions of the phenolic compounds-rich fraction from U. atrichocaulis (TFUA) and their antirheumatoid arthritis activities. We found that the TFUA significantly inhibited the adjuvant-induced rats arthritis, carrageenin-induced rats paw edema, cotton pellet-induced mice granuloma, and the acetic acid-induced mice writhing response. Our phytochemical investigations on the TFUA resulted in the first-time isolation and identification of 17 phenolic constituents and a bis (5-formylfurfuryl) ether. The extensive HPLC analysis also revealed the chemical compositions of TFUA. Our further biological evaluation of the main phenolic components, individually and collectively, indicated that the antirheumatoid arthritis activities of TFUA were the combined effect of multiple phenolic constituents.

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis is an immune-related inflammation disorder that affects over 60 million adults in the world wide. Its predominant symptoms include pain, stiffness, and swelling of peripheral joints. Rheumatoid arthritis may rapidly progress into a multisystem inflammation with irreversible joint destruction and increase the risk of mortality. However, the current treatment medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticosteroid, and immune-depressant are limited for their efficacy and frequently toxicity. Therefore, more and more patients look for medical botany options in coping with this debilitating disease. The recent investigation indicated that an estimated 60–90% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis were very likely to use botanicals. This growing interest in alternative medical practices clearly indicates the need for more safety and effective botanicals [1].

The genus Urtica (Urticaceae Family) is about 30 species and widely distributes in north and south temperate regions, also in mountainous areas of tropics [2]. Most species of genus Urtica are widely used for rheumatism and rheumatoid arthritis. Urtica dioica L. and U. urens L. have been used for arthritis for more than three thousand years in Europe [3]. In Asia, some Urtica species, such as U. fissa E. Pritz., U. laetevirens Maxim., and U. dentata (Hand.-Mazz.) C. J. Chen, are important herbs for rheumatism and rheumatoid arthritis [4]. The modern research showed that the aqueous extract of U. laetevirens Maxim. and U. fissa E. Pritz. had the potent inhibition of rheumatoid arthritis [57]. The ethanol extract of U. dioica L. significantly inhibited the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB and the maturation of human myeloid dendritic cells, indicating that it possessed the therapeutic effect on T-cell-mediated inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis [8, 9]. The aqueous extract of U. macrorrhiza Hand.-Mazz. was reported to obviously suppress the PGE2 release from PMφ in adjuvant-induced arthritis rats and the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA induced by lipopolysaccharide [10].

Urtica atrichocaulis (Hand.-Mazz.) C. J. Chen is endemic to China and widely distributed in Guizhou, Sichuan, and Yunnan provinces [2]. This plant is a perennial herb, up to 150 cm tall, inflorescence containing proximal female flowers and distal male flowers, achene ovoid, smooth, up to 0.8 mm. In traditional chinese medicine, the aerial part of this plant is a commonly used herb for rheumatoid arthritis, with a history more than 1000 years. However, its chemical constituent and pharmacological activity have not been reported yet. We evaluated the antirheumatoid arthritis activities of different fractions and found that the phenolic compounds-rich fraction from U. atrichocaulis (TFUA) had the potent activity. In the subsequent investigation of chemical compositions of TFUA, 18 compounds, including 17 phenolic constituents, were isolated. The pharmacological activities of the main phenolic constituents were evaluated by adjuvant-induced rats arthritis model. The results suggested that the multiple phenolic constituents were responsible for the antirheumatoid arthritis activities of TFUA.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Chemical Agents

Urtica atrichocaulis was collected from Xide County, Sichuan province (China) in April 2006, and authenticated by one of authors Professor Xiaobo Li. A voucher specimen (SJTU 20060419) was deposited in School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Dexamethasone, indometacin, aspirin, morphine, and CMC were purchased from Shanghai National Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Salicylic acid, phaselic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rutin for pharmacological test were purchased from Shanghai Ronghe Pharmaceutical Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Acetonitrile was HPLC grade from Shanghai Xingke Biochemistry Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Carrageenin (type IV) and Freund's complete adjuvant agent (FCA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Experimental Animals

Kunming mice (18–22 g) and SD rats (180–220 g) were obtained from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences. They were acclimatized for 5 days before use and provided food and water ad libitum. The use of animals in this project was approved and in compliance with the regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

2.3. Sample Preparation

The dried aerial part of U. atrichocaulis (7.7 kg) was extracted under reflux with alcohol 2 times for 2 h, filtrated, and concentrated in vacuum to give a greenish-black colored sticky extract (783 g). The extract (721 g) was suspended in 2000 mL water and sequently fractionated with petroleum ether (boiling range 30~60°C) and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate extract was evaporated and dried in vacuum to yield a yellowish-green extract, which was named the phenolic compounds-rich fraction from U. atrichocaulis (TFUA, 137 g). For pharmacological test, TFUA was dissolved in the 0.5% CMC solution.

2.4. Antirheumatoid Arthritis Activities
2.4.1. Adjuvant-Induced Rats Arthritis

Paw Swelling
Adjuvant-induced rats arthritis was induced according to the method in the literature [11]. In brief, the right footpad of each male rat was injected subcutaneously with 0.1 mL FCA, containing 10 mg heat-inactive BCG in 1.0 mL paraffin oil. On the 8th day after FCA injection, rats were randomized in groups and orally given the sample, dexamethasone, and CMC solution daily for 15 consecutive days, respectively. The pad thicknesses of the left and right hind paws were measured before and every other day after FCA injection using a dial thickness gauge (Mitutoyo, Japan). The paw swelling at each time point was expressed as an increase in the footpad thickness (mm).

Arthritis Index
A blinded independent observer with no knowledge of the treatment protocol performed the arthritis index evaluation for each rat every other day from the 8th day after FCA injection. Each noninjected paw was graded separately from 0 to 4, depending on the severity. The assessment was made as follows: 0, no response; 1, slight edema of the digital joints; 2, edema of the digital joints and footpad; 3, gross edema of the entire footpad below the joint; 4, edema of the entire foot. In the case of the more severe responses, swellings of the tail and ears also were generally observed, but no additional score was ascribed for these signs. The arthritis index for each rat was the sum of the scores of the three measured joints [12, 13].

2.4.2. Cotton Pellet Granuloma in Mice

Autoclaved cotton pellets weighing 5.0  ±  0.1 mg each were implanted subcutaneously through small incision made along the flank region of the male mice anesthetized with ether. The mice were orally administered the sample, dexamethasone, or CMC solution once daily for seven consecutive days from the day of cotton pellet insertion. On the 7th day, the mice were sacrificed and the cotton pellets covered by the granulomatous tissue were excised and dried in hot air oven at 60°C till a constant weight was achieved. Granuloma weight was obtained by subtracting the weight of cotton pellet on 0 d (before the start of experiment) from the weight of the cotton pellet on seventh day (at the end of experiment) [14].

2.4.3. Carrageenin-Induced Rats Paw Edema

Male rats were treated orally with sample, indomethacin, and CMC solution 60 min prior to an injection of 0.1 mL of 1% carrageenin sterile (w/v) in saline into the plantar tissue of the right hind paw. The contralateral hind paws were injected with 0.1 mL of saline as control. Paw pad thickness was measured at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h after carrageenin injection, and paw swelling was obtained by subtracting the right pad thickness from the left pad thickness [12].

2.4.4. Acetic Acid-Induced Mice Writhing Response

Mice were kept singly in a clear plastic observational cage (35 cm  ×  25 cm  ×  15 cm) and were pretreated with sample, aspirin or CMC solution by intragastric administration 60 min prior to intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid in a volume of 0.1 mL per mouse. After the injection of acetic acid, the number of writhes exhibited for 15 min were counted. The percent inhibition was calculated as follows [15]:

2.4.5. Mice Hot-Plate Test

Female mice were placed on an YLS-6A intelligent hot-plate apparatus (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, China). The temperature of metal surface was maintained at 55.0  ±  0.5°C. Latency to a discomfort reaction (licking hind paw) was taken as pain threshold in mice and a cut-off time of 60 seconds was maintained to prevent scald. The fifty valid mice were selected (the pain threshold was determined in 5 to 30 seconds) and divided into five groups randomly. The deferent groups of mice were orally administered the sample, CMC solution, or intraperitoneally injected morphine. The pain threshold was determined before and 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after administration, respectively [16].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test for the arthritic scores, or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for the others indices with the aid of SPSS11.5 software package. Statistical significance is expressed as *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01.

3. Chemical Compositions Analysis

3.1. Isolation and Structure Identification of Compounds in TFUA

TFUA was fractionated by silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang chemical Co., Ltd.) column chromatography and gradually eluted with dichloromethane-methanol. The fractions obtained were further purified by repeat silica gel and Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia) column chromatography to yield pure compounds.

Compound identification was carried out by determination spectra data. The 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data were obtained with the solvent as reference, employing Bruker Avance 400 spectrometers. Molecular weight was obtained on Finnigan/MAT 4510 mass spectrometer. Optical rotation values were determined with a JASCO Dip-360 digital polarimeter.

3.2. Chemical Analysis of TFUA

Chemical analysis of TFUA was performed with an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatograph equipped with a DAD detector, quaternary pump, on-line degasser, autosampler, and thermostatic column compartment. Phenolic compounds were separated on an Agilent Zorbax Elipse XDB-C18 column (5 μm, 250  ×  4.6 mm). Then the contents of main constituents in TFUA were calculated using their standards.

4. Results

4.1. Antirheumatoid Arthritis Effects of TFUA

TFUA showed the obvious therapeutic effect on the adjuvant-induced arthritis. It could significantly inhibit the paw swell induced by FCA and decreased the arthritis index, indicating it can inhibit the primary inflammation and second inflammation (Table 1). So its other pharmacological activities related to antirheumatoid arthritis, such as inhibiting nonspecific inflammation and analgesic activities, were warranted to the further evaluation.

GroupDose (mg/kg)Paw swell (mm)Arthritis index
12 d16 d20 d12 d16 d20 d

Vehicle4.21  ±  0.843.52  ±  1.013.86  ±  0.723.63  ±  0.713.47  ±  0.453.29  ±  0.737.6  ±  2.19.9  ±  2.610.3  ±  1.9
Dexamethasone303.34  ±  0.66*2.61  ±  0.76*3.09  ±  0.56*2.52  ±  0.76**2.88  ±  0.27**2.07  ±  0.62**5.2  ±  2.3*4.4  ±  1.8**3.5  ±  2.7**
TFUA503.77  ±  0.753.07  ±  0.943.61  ±  0.622.82  ±  0.97*3.02  ±  0.46*2.52  ±  0.56*7.1  ±  1.98.7  ±  1.58.4  ±  2.3
1503.51  ±  0.61*2.89  ±  0.85*3.20  ±  0.67*2.77  ±  0.85*2.81  ±  0.61*2.27  ±  0.68**6.5  ±  2.07.8  ±  1.5*7.6  ±  2.2*

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N  =  10. *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01 compared with vehicle control.

The inhibiting activity of nonspecific inflammation was evaluated by the models of mice cotton pellet granuloma and carrageenin-induced rats paw edema. The results showed that TFUA had the moderate anti-inflammatory activity. It could inhibit the granuloma hyperplasia caused by cotton pellet at the dosages of 50 and 150 mg/kg (Figure 1). TFUA could reduce the carrageenin-induced rat paw edema also, and this activity became obvious at 4 h after administration (Table 2).

Group  Dose (mg/kg)Paw swell (mm)
2 h4 h6 h

Vehicle4.72  ±  0.885.15  ±  1.064.93  ±  0.92
Indometacin303.78  ±  0.93*3.22  ±  0.73**2.37  ±  0.95**
TFUA504.42  ±  1.264.08  ±  0.95*3.69  ±  0.71*
1504.38  ±  0.653.64  ±  0.78**3.20  ±  0.83**

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N  =  10. *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01 compared with vehicle control.

The analgesic activity of TFUA was evaluated by the mice models of acetic acid-induced writhing response and hot-plate test. The results of acetic acid-induced writhing response revealed that TFUA had the obviously analgesic activity. It could significantly decrease the number of writhes induced by acetic acid (Table 3). However, the obvious analgesic activity of TFUA was not observed in the hot-plate test (Table 4). These results indicated that TFUA inhibited the inflammatory pain rather than neuropathic pain.

GroupDose (mg/kg)Number of writhes in 15 minInhibition rate (%)

Vehicle29.5  ±  8.4
Aspirin15014.3  ±  4.8**51.5
TFUA5020.5  ±  6.4**30.5
15011.7  ±  3.2**63.4

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N  =  10. *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01 compared with vehicle control.

GroupDose (mg/kg) Anterior pain threshold (s)Posterior pain threshold (s)

Vehicle18.0  ±  3.520.1  ±  5.721.5  ±  5.621.2  ±  6.719.9  ±  8.1
Morphine3018.5  ±  3.530.4**  ±  3.835.0**  ±  6.028.6**  ±  4.127.4**  ±  4.6
TFUA5019.4  ±  3.821.6  ±  5.523.2  ±  6.121.7  ±  7.221.3  ±  8.8
15019.0  ±  3.721.2  ±  5.422.7  ±  5.921.4  ±  7.022.0  ±  8.5

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N  =  10. *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01 compared with vehicle control.
4.2. Isolation and Structure Identification of Compounds in TFUA

TFUA (83 g) was fractionated by silica gel column chromatography and gradually eluted with dichloromethane-methanol (95 : 5–60 : 40) to give 76 fractions of 500 mL each. These fractions were purified by repeat silica gel and sephadex LH-20 column chromatography and resulted in the isolation of 18 compounds (Figure 2). Their spectral data were as the following:

Bis (5-formylfurfuryl) ether (1, 13 mg)
Colorless needle (chloroform); HR EI-MS m/z: 234.0532, calcd for C12H10O5, 234.0528. 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [17].

Scopoletin (2, 8 mg)
Colorless needle (MeOH). 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [18].

(–) Olivil (3, 6 mg)
Colorless powder (MeOH); −43.5° (c  =  1.0, CHCl3). 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [19].

(–) Secoisolariciresinol (4, 11 mg)
Colorless powder (MeOH). −21.3° (c  =  1.0, MeOH). 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 6.64 (2H, d, J  =  1.8 Hz, H-2, 2′), 6.69 (2H, d, J  =  8.0 Hz, H-5, 5′), 6.58 (2H, dd, J  =  1.8, 8.0 Hz, H-6, 6′), 2.67 (2H, dd, J  =  7.0, 13.8 Hz, H-7a, 7′a), 2.59 (2H, dd, J  =  7.0, 13. 8 Hz, H-7b, 7′b), 1.92 (2H, m, H-8, 8′), 3.61 (2H, m, H-9, 9′), 3.75 (6H, s, 2  ×  OCH3); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 134.2 (C-1, 1′), 114.0 (C-2, 2′), 149.1 (C-3, 3′), 145.7 (C-4, 4′), 116.0 (C-5, 5′), 123.0 (C-6, 6′), 36.3 (C-7, 7′), 44.5 (C-8, 8′), 62.4 (C-9, 9′), 56.1 (2  ×  OCH3) [20].

(–) Matairesinol (5, 8 mg)
Colorless powder (MeOH). −37.0° (c  =  1.0, CHCl3). 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [21].

Ferulic Acid (6, 5 mg)
Colorless styloid (MeOH); EI-MS m/z: 194 (M+); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [22].

p-Coumaric Acid (7, 10 mg)
Colorless needle (acetone); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [22].

Caffeic Acid (8, 7 mg)
Yellowish needle (MeOH). 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [23].

Protocatechuic Aldehyde (9, 14 mg)
Colorless needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [24].

Salicylic Acid (10, 33 mg)
Colorless needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [25].

Luteolin (11, 6 mg)
Yellow needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [26].

Quercetin (12, 15 mg)
Yellow needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [18].

Gossypetin (13, 6 mg)
Yellow needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [27].

Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (14, 23 mg)
Yellow granule (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) spectral data were consistent with those reported in the literature [28].

Rutin (15, 57 mg)
Yellow powder (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data agreed with those reported in the literature [29].

Kaempferol 3, 7-di-O-rhamnopyranoside (16, 10 mg)
Yellow needle (MeOH); 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.80 (2H, d, J  =  8.7 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 6.94 (2H, d, J  =  8.7 Hz, H-3′, 5′), 6.75 (1H, d, J  =  2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.48 (1H, d, J  =  2.0 Hz, H-6), 5.06 (1H, d, J  =  2.0 Hz, 3-rha H-1), 5.04 (1H, d, J  =  2.0 Hz, 7-rha H-1), 1.25 (3H, d, J  =  6.1 Hz, 7-rha-Me), 0.93 (3H, d, J  =  5.5 Hz, 3-rha -Me); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 158.1 (C-2), 136.5 (C-3), 179.8 (C-4), 163.1 (C-5), 99.9 (C-6), 163.6 (C-7), 95.6 (C-8), 161.1 (C-9), 107.6 (C-10), 122.4 (C-1′), 132.0 (C-2′, 6′), 116.6 (C-3′, 5′), 161.8 (C-4′). 3-rha: 103.5 (C-1), 72.1 (C-2), 73.2 (C-3), 73.6 (C-4), 71.9 (C-5), 18.1 (C-6); 7-rha: 100.6 (C-1), 71.7 (C-2), 72.1 (C-3), 73.6 (C-4), 71.3 (C-5), 17.7 (C-6) [30].

Phaselic Acid (17, 28 mg)
Yellow needle (MeOH); +34.8° (c  =  2.0, H2O). 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz): 6.96 (1H, d, J  =  8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.14 (1H, brd, J  =  8.0 Hz, H-6), 7.22 (1H, brs, H-2), 7.68 (1H, d, J  =  16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.44 (1H, d, J  =  16.0 Hz, H-8), 5.16 (1H, dd, J  =  2.8, 11.2 Hz, H-2′), 2.84 (1H, dd, J  =  2.8, 15.6 Hz, H-3′a), 2.65 (1H, dd, J  =  11.2, 15.6 Hz, H-3′b); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz): 147.6 (C-1), 146.7 (C-7), 144.6 (C-2), 127.8 (C-5), 123.4 (C-4), 116.8 (C-8), 115.7 (C-3), 115.1 (C-6), 178.8 (C-1′), 74.2 ( C-2′), 40.2 (C-3′), 178.0 (C-4′) [31].

Chlorogenic Acid (18, 33 mg)
Colorless needle (MeOH); 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data agreed with those reported in the literature [32].

4.3. HPLC Analysis of TFUA

The chemical compositions of TFUA were further investigated by HPLC analysis. The results showed that phenolic acids and flavonoids were the main constituents. The relatively rich phenolics (contents above 5 percent) included rutin, chlorogenic acid, phaselic acid, and salicylic acid (Figure 3, Table 5).

Phenolic acidsFlavonoidsThe others

Chlorogenic acid88.3Rutin124.1Secoisolariciresinol37.5
Phaselic acid62.4Quercetin30.9Scopoletin21.6
Salicylic acid52.9Luteolin4.4
Caffeic acid17.6
Protocatechuic aldehyde10.3

4.4. The Antirheumatoid Arthritis Activities of the Main Phenolic Compounds and Their Combination

In order to screen the antirheumatoid arthritis constituents in TFUA, the pharmacological activities of the main phenolic acids, flavanoids, and their combination (the ratio was based on their contents in TFUA) were evaluated by FCA-induced rats arthritis model. The phenolic acids exhibited the statistically significant inhibition of edema in the injected paw (primary response) at dose levels of 50 mg/kg orally, when compared with the vehicle control group. Rutin showed moderate activity of inhibition of edema in the uninjected paw (second response). It is noted that neither phenolic acids nor flavanoids exhibited the significant suppressive effect on both primary swelling and second pathological changes of the experimental rats. However, their combination showed the obvious inhibition activity of paw edema in both the injected paw and the uninjected paw (Table 6). So, the antirheumatoid arthritis activity of TFUA may be the combined action of phenolic acids and flavanoids.

GroupDose (mg/kg)Paw swell (mm)Arthritis index
12 d16 d20 d12 d16 d20 d

Vehicle4.45  ±  0.933.80  ±  0.614.16  ±  0.894.03  ±  0.773.89  ±  0.543.57  ±  0.618.5  ±  2.310.8  ±  1.711.1  ±  2.4
Dexamethasone303.33  ±  0.65*3.09  ±  0.87*2.92  ±  0.72**2.84  ±  0.47**2.23  ±  0.42**2.24  ±  0.58**6.2  ±  1.7*4.9  ±  1.8**3.7  ±  2.7**
Salicylic acid503.57  ±  0.89*3.67  ±  0.793.34  ±  0.56*3.51  ±  0.832.95  ±  0.61*3.25  ±  0.437.7  ±  2.810.1  ±  2.59.8  ±  1.7
Phaselic acid503.88  ±  0.893.52  ±  0.853.09  ±  0.67**3.62  ±  0.532.71  ±  0.49**3.28  ±  0.736.9  ±  2.69.8  ±  1.710.4  ±  2.1
Chlorogenic acid504.21  ±  0.663.55  ±  0.443.73  ±  0.753.66  ±  0.593.56  ±  0.853.39  ±  0.768.1  ±  2.510.3  ±  1.710.8  ±  2.3
Rutin504.36  ±  0.803.40  ±  0.673.92  ±  0.543.29  ±  0.47*3.78  ±  0.922.83  ±  0.87*7.6  ±  2.09.3  ±  1.38.7  ±  1.9*
Combinationa503.48  ±  0.72*3.21  ±  0.58*3.40  ±  0.71*3.04  ±  0.55**2.84  ±  0.65**2.61  ±  0.77**7.2  ±  1.89.0  ±  1.9*8.2  ±  1.5*

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N  =  10. *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01 compared with vehicle control. aThe ratio of rutin  :  chlorogenic acid  :  phaselic acid  :  salicylic acid in combination was 12 : 9 : 6 : 5, according to their contents in phenolic compounds-rich fraction from Urtica atrichocaulis (TFUA).

5. Discussion

It is well known that salicylic acid and its derivative aspirin had the anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity and often used to cure rheumatoid arthritis. However, these constituents only inhibit primary response, do not affect the second response and immune function, which is similar with the result of the present study. Although immunosuppressive agent and glucocorticosteroid inhibit secondary process, they have obvious side effect and toxicity. So the exploit of the antirheumatoid arthritis agent which could inhibit both the primary and secondary process, and possess good effect and lower toxicity from medical plant, had drawn much attention.

Urtica atrichocaulis has been used as antirheumatoid herb in China for a long time and no obvious toxicity has been reported. In order to screen for its antirheumatoid arthritis fraction, the anti-inflammatory activity of three partition fractions, that is, petroleum ether fraction, ethyl acetate fraction, and water layer fraction from alcohol extract were evaluated by the adjuvant-induced rat arthritis model. The results showed that TFUA inhibited both primary and secondary processes and showed the potent activity of anti-nonspecific inflammation and analgesic activities (Table 1); however, the petroleum ether fraction and water layer fraction did not show the obvious activity (data not given). So the chemical compositions of TFUA were warranted to the systemic investigation.

In order to elucidate the constituents in TFUA, the systemic isolation of TFUA was carried out. As a result, eighteen compounds were isolated, of which the phenolic acids and flavanoids were the main constituents (Figure 3). Subsequently, the contents of the main constituents of TFUA were determined by HPLC. The result showed that chlorogenic acid, phaselic acid, rutin, and salicylic acid were the main phenolic constituents (Figure 3, Table 5).

In order to investigate the active constituents of TFUA, the antirheumatoid arthritis actions of main phenolic constituents were further evaluated. The results suggested that the main phenolic acids (chlorogenic acid, phaselic acid, and salicylic acid) in TFUA inhibited the primary response; the main flavanoids (rutin) inhibited the second response. The antirheumatoid arthritis of TFUA may be the combined action of multiple phenolic constituents.

Some phenolics were reported to possess the therapeutic effect on rheumatoid arthritis. Salicylic acid and its derivates had the potent anti-inflammatory activity and analgesic activity and usually used for rheumatoid arthritis patients to relieve the joint inflammation and pain. Recent research reported that scopoletin had good analgesic activity [33]; quercetin, rutin, and kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside had the immune modulation and antirheumatoid arthritis action, they reduce adjuvant-induced arthritis clinical signs and decrease human macrophage-derived inflammatory mediators [3436]; kaempherol-3-O-rutinoside had the immunostimulatory activity and could possibly be useful for treating patients suffering from chronic granulomatous diseases [37]. Caffeic acid showed the powerful inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis and significantly suppressed expression of NFATc1 in adjuvant-induced arthritis rats [38]. The present study revealed that TFUA contained a high level of rutin, salicylic acid, caffeic acid, scopoletin, and quercetin. So, the antirheumatoid arthritis activity of U. atrichocaulis is very likely to be the combined action of multiple phenolic compounds.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the phenolic compounds-rich fraction from Urtica atrichocaulis inhibit the experimental arthritis induced by FCA and its activity may be the combined effect of multiple phenolic compounds. The antirheumatoid arthritis effects observed in vivo may give an explanation for the clinical application of U. atrichocaulis in therapy of rheumatoid diseases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report no conflict of interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.


This work was financially supported by the Research Foundation of Shanghai Health Bureau (no. 2004Y002A) and National Project in Significant Creation of New Drugs during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan Period (2009ZX09502-0130). Shuyan Zhou, Fangdi Qi, Kangmu Ma, and Yiwen Zhu took part in the isolation work and pharmacological evaluation.


  1. K. L. Soeken, S. A. Miller, and E. Ernst, “Herbal medicines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review,” Rheumatology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 652–659, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. R. Chen, Q. Lin, I. Friis, C. M. Wilmot-Dear, and A. K. Monro, “Urticaceae,” in Flora of China, Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong, Eds., vol. 5, pp. 78–84, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. Li and Q. L. Zhang, “The review of pharmacological activity of genus Urtica,” Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 297–298, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. Y. Wang and Y. F. Wei, “The medical investigation of genus Urtica in folk,” Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy, vol. 10, no. 53, pp. 345–346, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. Tang, B. Q. Ji, L. Y. Shi, Y. Q. Wang, and B. M. Feng, “Experimental study of Urtica fissa Pritz. in anti-rheumatoid arthritis,” West China Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 552–555, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. Tang, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, B. M. Feng, L. Y. Shi, and Y. Q. Wang, “Effects of Urtica laetevirens Maxim. on anti-rheumatoid arthritis,” Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research,, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 777–779, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  7. X. H. Li, Y. N. Zhao, X. X. Shao, S. Y. Li, B. L. Li, and R. P. Zhang, “The effects of the aqueous fraction from Urtica macrorrhiza Hand.-Mazz. on the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha from peritoneal macrophages in adjuvant arthritis rats,” Journal of Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 21–23, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. Riehemann, B. Behnke, and K. Schulze-Osthoff, “Plant extracts from stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), an antirheumatic remedy, inhibit the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB,” FEBS Letters, vol. 442, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Broer and B. Behnke, “Immunosuppressant effect of IDS 30, a stinging nettle leaf extract, on myeloid dendritic cells in vitro,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 659–666, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. X. H. Li, S. Y. Li, Y. N. Zhao, B. L. Li, and X. X. Shao, “Effects of aqueous fraction of Urtica macrorrhiza Hand.-Mazz. on production of PGE2 release from peritoneal macrophages in vivo and the expression of COX-2 mRNA in vitro,” Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2132–2134, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. B. Newbould, “Chemotherapy of arthritis induced in rats by mycobacterial adjuvant,” British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy, vol. 21, pp. 127–136, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. H. Park and J. H. Kahng, “Suppressive effects of propolis in rat adjuvant arthritis,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 554–558, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  13. H. Chen, S. Shoumura, S. Emura, and H. Isono, “Tibetan Medicated-bath therapy may improve adjuvant arthritis in rat,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Wu, C. Zhou, X. Li et al., “Evaluation of antiinflammatory activity of the total flavonoids of Laggera pterodonta on acute and chronic inflammation models,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 585–590, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. Yongna, R. Wantana, B. Pisit, L. Zhongkun, and Z. Rongping, “Analgesic and antipyretic activities of the aqueous extract of Urtica macrorrhiza in experimental animals,” Fitoterapia, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 91–95, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. O. O. Adeyemi, S. O. Okpo, and O. O. Ogunti, “Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of the aqueous extract of leaves of Persea americana Mill (Lauraceae),” Fitoterapia, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 375–380, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Q. Zhang, Y. M. Ding, G. Y. Chen, Y. F. Dong, and Y. L. Zhu, “Studies on active constituents of root of Euphorbia ebracteolata Hayata (Euphorbiaceae),” Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 429–431, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. C. Chen, Manual of the Standard Chemical Constituents of Chinese Medicine, China Medical Science Press, Beijing, China, 2000.
  19. F. Abe, T. Yamauchi, and A. S. C. Wan, “Lignans related to olivil from genus Cerbera (Cerbera VI),” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 795–799, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. H. Xie, T. Akao, K. Hamasaki, T. Deyama, and M. Hattori, “Biotransformation of pinoresinol diglucoside to mammalian lignans by human intestinal microflora, and isolation of Enterococcus faecalis strain PDG-1 responsible for the transformation of (+)-pinoresinol to (+)-lariciresinol,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 508–515, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. M. A. Rahman, P. M. Dewick, D. E. Jackson, and J. A. Lucas, “Lignans of Forsythia intermedia,” Phytochemistry, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1971–1980, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. Tu, W. Wu, and J. Zheng, “Phenolic acids from the bulbs of Notholirion Bulbuliferum,” Yaoxue Xuebao, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 41–42, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. R. Zhao, M. S. Wang, and G. P. Zhou, “Studies on constituents of Ilex chinensis Sims,” China journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 226–255, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  24. W. Chen and X. C. Liu, “Protocatechuic aldehyde isolation and identification of catechol aldehyde from danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza),” Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 442–445, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Y. Li, Y. H. Teng, Y. H. Cheng, and L. J. Wu, “Study on the chemical constituents of Mulberry,” Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 422–424, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. Youssef and A. W. Frahm, “Constituents of the Egyptian Centaurea scoparia; III. Phenolic consituents of the aerial parts,” Planta Medica, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 570–573, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. X. R. Wang, Z. H. Zhou, A. Q. Du, and Z. M. Huang, “Studies on the flavonol constituents of Abelmoschus manihot L. Medic,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–93, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. H. Sawada, M. Miyakoshi, S. Isoda, Y. Ida, and J. Shoji, “Saponins from leaves of Acanthopanax sieboldianus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1117–1121, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. R. Bilia, L. Ciampi, J. Mendez, and I. Morelli, “Phytochemical investigations of Licania genus. Flavonoids from Licania pyrifolia,” Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 199–204, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Y. Si, D. H. Chen, L. G. Shen, and G. Z. Tu, “Studies on the chemical constituents of the root of Siratia grosvenorii,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 158–160, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  31. H. Tazaki, M. Ito, M. Miyoshi et al., “Subulatin, an antioxidic caffeic acid derivative isolated from the in vitro cultured liverworts, Jungermannia subulata, Lophocolea heterophylla, and Scapania parvitexta,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  32. L. H. Hu and Z. L. Chen, “Structure elucidation of a new n-pentyl fructofuranoside in Dendranthema morifolium (Ramat.) Tzvel,” Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 181–184, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  33. F. C. Meotti, J. V. Ardenghi, J. B. Pretto et al., “Antinociceptive properties of coumarins, steroid and dihydrostyryl-2- pyrones from Polygala sabulosa (Polygalaceae) in mice,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. Kauss, D. Moynet, J. Rambert et al., “Rutoside decreases human macrophage-derived inflammatory mediators and improves clinical signs in adjuvant-induced arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, article no. R19, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. H. Lee and G. H. Kim, “Evaluation of antioxidant and inhibitory activities for different subclasses flavonoids on enzymes for rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. H212–H217, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Mamani-Matsuda, T. Kauss, A. Al-Kharrat et al., “Therapeutic and preventive properties of quercetin in experimental arthritis correlate with decreased macrophage inflammatory mediators,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1304–1310, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Akbay, A. A. Basaran, U. Undeger, and N. Basaran, “In vitro immunomodulatory activity of flavonoid glycosides from Urtica dioica L,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. T. Quan, T. Kukita, Y. Ushijima et al., “Regulation of osteoclastogenesis by Simon extracts composed of caffeic acid and related compounds: successful suppression of bone destruction accompanied with adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 215–225, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Mengyue Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2331 Views | 867 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.