Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 269874, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/269874
Research Article

Ethanol Extract of Ulmus pumila Root Bark Inhibits Clinically Isolated Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

1Department of Oral Biochemistry, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
2Wonkwang Research Institute for Food Industry, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
3College of Education, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
4Department of Oral Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea

Received 1 August 2013; Accepted 3 September 2013

Academic Editor: Tong Ho Kang

Copyright © 2013 Yong-Ouk You et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this study, root bark of Ulmus pumila (U. pumila) was extracted with ethanol, and then the antimicrobial effects were tested on clinically isolated 12 MRSA strains and 1 standard MRSA strain. U. pumila showed antibacterial activities against all MRSA strains. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of U. pumila root bark against all MRSA strains revealed a range from 125 to 250 μg/mL. These results may provide the scientific basis on which U. pumila root bark has traditionally been used against infectious diseases in Korea. In real-time PCR analysis, the sub-MIC (64–125 μg/mL) concentrations of U. pumila root bark extract showed the inhibition of the genetic expressions of virulence factors such as mecA, sea, agrA, and sarA in standard MRSA. Phytochemical analyses of U. pumila root bark showed relatively strong presence of phenolics, steroids, and terpenoids. These results suggest that the ethanol extract of U. pumila root bark may have antibacterial activity against MRSA, which may be related to the phytochemicals such as phenolics, steroids, and terpenoids. Further studies are needed to determine the active constituents of U. pumila root bark responsible for such biomolecular activities.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common bacteria in humans. S. aureus is normally present in the skin, nasal cavity, or laryngopharynx of healthy men and opportunistically causes a local or systemic infection [1, 2]. However, S. aureus is a causative bacteria of nosocomial infection and occupies more than 80% of pyogenic infection such as abscess and septicemia [25].

Penicillin was developed in 1941 and has been used as a therapeutic agent indicated for bacterial infections. Since then, numerous antibiotic agents have been developed and are effective against bacterial infections, but the appearance of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains caused a big problem in the treatment of patients [6, 7]. The appearance of such antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains tends to increase due to the overuse of antibiotics. Antibiotic-resistant strains which became an important issue in the world include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [8]. These bacteria strains have multidrug resistance showing resistance to various antibiotic agents such as β-lactams, or aminoglycosides. Treatment of patients infected with these bacterial strains is known to be very difficult [9, 10], so MRSA is one of the important causes of modern chronic infectious diseases. It is known that the resistance mechanisms of MRSA to methicillin include (1) production of β-lactamase, which inactivate the β-lactam antibiotics and (2) the possession of mecA gene that produces penicillin-binding proteins, such as PBP, PBP2′, or PBP2a, which have low affinity to β-lactam antibiotics [7]. Since MRSA shows resistance to various antibiotics, it is necessary to develop new substances for the treatment of MRSA. Several natural substances may be candidates for new antibiotic substances [11]. We have explored natural substances with antimicrobial effects on MRSA [1214].

Ulmus pumila (U. pumila) is a natural herb that has traditionally been used for the treatment of infections in Korea. U. pumila, belonging to the botanical classification of Ulmaceae, is distributed in Korea, Japan, northern China, Sakhalin, and East Siberia. This tree grows to 15 meters and its bark is dark brown in color. Owing to its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory reaction, U. pumila has been traditionally used for abscess, infection, edema, rhinitis, empyema, and otitis media. It has also been used for gastric and duodenal ulcers as well as gastric cancer [1517].

In this study, U. pumila was extracted with ethanol, and then the antimicrobial effects of U. pumila ethanol extract were tested on clinically isolated 12 MRSA strains and 1 standard MRSA strain, and phytochemical analysis was performed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Extraction

The bark of U. pumila was obtained from the oriental drug store, Dae Hak Yak Kuk (Iksan, South Korea). The identity was confirmed by Dr. Bong-Seop Kil at the Department of Natural Science, Wonkwang University.

Voucher specimen (number 09-03-26) has been deposited at the Herbarium of Department of Oral Biochemistry in Wonkwang University. Dried bark of U. pumila (100 g) was chopped into small pieces and was extracted 2 times with 1000 mL of ethanol for 72 h at room temperature. The filtration of the extracted solution and evaporation under reduced pressure yielded ethanol extracts (9.3 g). After the extract was thoroughly dried for complete removal of solvent, the dry extract was then stored in a deep freezer (−70°C).

2.2. Bacterial Strains

Staphylococcal strains listed in Table 1 were 12 clinical isolates (MRSA) from Wonkwang University Hospital and the standard strain of MRSA ATCC 33591. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined from the size of the inhibition zone, in accordance with guidelines of Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2010), and the used strains were defined as MRSA based on occurrence of the mecA gene and their resistance to oxacillin [18]. β-Lactamase activity was also determined using the DrySlide Beta Lactamase test (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) according to manufacturer’s specification. After culturing on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco Laboratories), the bacteria were suspended in Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories) and used for inoculation. All MRSA strains used in this study are identified as MRSA [13].

tab1
Table 1: Bacterial strains used the test of antibacterial activity.

2.3. Disc Diffusion Method

As the first screening, the paper disc diffusion method was used to determine antibacterial activity, which is based on the method described previously [12, 19]. Sterile paper discs (6 mm; Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Japan) were loaded with 50 μL of different amounts (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg) of the extracts dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and were left to dry for 12 h at 37°C in a sterile room. Bacterial suspensions were diluted to match the 0.5 MacFarland standard scale (approximately  CFU/mL) and they were further diluted to obtain a final inoculum. After Mueller-Hinton agar was poured into Petri dishes to give a solid plate and inoculated with 100 μL of suspension containing  CFU/mL of bacteria, the discs treated with extracts were applied to Petri dishes. Ampicillin and oxacillin were used as positive controls and paper discs treated with DMSO were used as negative controls. The plates were then incubated at 35°C for 24 h in a incubator (Vision Co., Seoul, Korea). Inhibition zone diameters around each disc were measured and recorded at the end of the incubation time.

2.4. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

MICs were determined by the agar dilution method, which is based on the method described previously [12, 20]. MICs of ampicillin and oxacillin were also determined. A final inoculum of  CFU/mL was spotted with a multipoint inoculator (Denley Instruments, Sussex, UK) onto agar plates. The plates were then incubated at 35°C for 24 h in the incubator (Vision Co., Seoul, Korea). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of extracts at which no visible growth was observed. The minimum concentration of extracts that inhibited 50% and 90% of the isolates tested was defined as MIC50 and MIC90, respectively.

2.5. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Analysis

To determine the effect of U. pumila extract on gene expression, a real-time PCR assay was performed. The sub-MIC (32–125 μg/mL) of U. pumila extract was used to treat and culture MRSA ATCC 33591 for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from MRSA by using Trizol reagent (Gibco-BRL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was treated with DNase to digest contaminated DNA. Then, cDNA was synthesized using a reverse transcriptase reaction (Superscript; Gibco-BRL). The DNA amplifications were carried out using an ABI-Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System with Absolute QPCR SYBR Green Mixes (Applied Bio systems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). The primer pairs that were used in this study were described by previous reports [2123] and are listed in Table 2. 16S rRNA was used as an internal control.

tab2
Table 2: Nucleotide sequences of primer used for real-time PCR in this study.

2.6. Phytochemical Screening

Phytochemical tests of extracts were performed as previously described [24, 25]. Mayer’s reagent was used for alkaloids, ferric chloride reagent for phenolics, Molisch test for glycosides, Biuret reagent for proteins, Mg-HCl reagent for flavonoids, Liebermann-Burchard reagent for steroids, and silver nitrate reagent for organic acids.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Data were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). Differences between means of the experimental and control groups were evaluated by the Student’s t-test.

3. Results

In this study, the antibiotic effect of ethanol extract of U. pumila on clinically isolated MRSA strain 12 and standard MRSA strain 1 (ATCC 33591) was examined. As a result of measuring antibacterial activity of U. pumila using the disc diffusion method, U. pumila showed antibacterial activities against all strains (Table 3). In all MRSA strains, 1 mg of U. pumila showed 14–19 mm of inhibition zone and 0.5 mg of U. pumila showed 9–16 mm of inhibition zone.

tab3
Table 3: Antimicrobial activity (mm inhibition zones diameter) of extracts of Ulmus pumila against 12 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 1 standard MRSA.

This experimental result was confirmed through MIC measurement (Table 4). Ethanol extract of U. pumila showed a range of MICs from 125 μg/mL to 250 μg/mL in all MRSA strains. In most strains, the growth of bacteria was inhibited noticeably from 250 μg/mL of U. pumila concentration. The MICs for ampicillin and oxacillin against MRSA strains clinically isolated, which had been used as the positive control, were 4–46 μg/mL and 4–16 μg/mL, respectively. These results showed that the MRSA strains isolated clinically have resistance to ampicillin and oxacillin. From this experimental result, these clinically isolated MRSA strains showed resistance to ampicillin or oxacillin. We performed real-time PCR analysis to examine the effect of sub-MIC (32–125 μg/mL) concentrations of U. pumila extract on the genetic expressions of virulence factors in standard MRSA (ATCC 33591). The expressions of mecA, sea, agrA, and sarA were significantly decreased in MRSA when it was treated with the sub-MIC (63–125 μg/mL) concentrations of U. pumila extract (Figure 1).

tab4
Table 4: Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the Ulmus pumila, ampicillin, and oxacillin against 12 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 1 standard MRSA.
fig1
Figure 1: Real-time PCR analysis of expression of several virulence factor genes. MRSA ATCC 33591 was cultured and treated with sub-MIC concentrations (32–125 μg/mL) of U. pumila extract, and real-time PCR analysis was then performed as described in the Section 2. mecA, sea, sarA, and agrA expressions were significantly inhibited at concentration higher than 64 μg/mL. Each value is expressed as a mean ± standard deviation. Significance was determined at when compared with the control.

As a result of phytochemical analysis of U. pumila, phenolics, steroids, and terpenoids were detected with a relatively high content; glycosides were detected with a medium level of content; flavonoids, peptides, and organic acids were detected with low content; but alkaloids were nearly never detected (Table 5).

tab5
Table 5: Phytochemical analysis of the ethanol extract of Ulmus pumila.

4. Discussion

MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant strain, causes severe complex clinical problems in many parts of the world. Therefore, new agents are needed to treat the MRSA. Some natural products are candidates of new antibiotic substances. Traditionally, U. pumila has been used for the treatment of infectious diseases in Korea. In this study, antibacterial activities of ethanol extract of U. pumila on clinically isolated 12 MRSA strains and 1 standard MRSA strain were examined.

Antibacterial activities of U. pumila were measured by using the disc diffusion method, which were then also confirmed through MIC measurements. U. pumila ethanol extract showed antibacterial abilities against all the strains, 12 strains of MRSA isolated clinically and 1 standard strain of MRSA. The fact that U. pumila extract suppresses growth of S. aureus could provide the scientific basis, that the extract had been used for the treatment of infectious diseases.

According to previous studies, U. pumila was known to contain steroidal chemicals such as β-Sitosterol, phytosterol, and stigmasterol; terpenoid chemicals such as friedelin, epifriendelalol, and taraxerol; phenolics such as tannin; and polysaccharides such as starch [16]. In this study, the phytochemical analysis of U. pumila showed a result of relatively high content of phenolics, steroids, and terpenoids. This result suggests that the antibacterial activity of U. pumila may be related with these chemicals. However, more additional researches are required to identify the antibacterial components in U. pumila.

Several mechanisms by which microorganisms can overcome antimicrobial agents are known. These mechanisms include production of drug insensitive enzymes, modification of targets for drug, and multidrug resistance pump which discharge the antimicrobial agents entered in bacterial cells. mecA is the typical multidrug resistance gene, and fem, llm, and sigB are also the other multidrug resistance genes [26]. Recent studies reported that some medicinal plants contain multidrug resistance inhibitor that is to lower the MIC of antimicrobial agents [27]. In the present study, the effect of sub-MIC (32–125 μg/mL) concentrations of U. pumila extract on the genetic expression of mecA was determined by real-time PCR analysis. The expression of mecA was significantly decreased in standard MRSA (ATCC 33591) when it was treated with concentration higher than 64 μg/mL. Additional investigation is necessary to determine whether U. pumila may have multidrug resistance inhibitors.

A virulence factor gene, sea, encodes Staphylococcal enterotoxin A which is one of major virulence factors in MRSA [28]. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A is one cause of gastroenteritis in humans and acts as a superantigen. In this study, the sub-MIC concentrations of U. pumila extract significantly inhibited sea expression. sea gene expression in MRSA is regulated by global regulators such as agr and sarA genes [21]. In our study, sub-MIC (64–125 μg/mL) concentrations of U. pumila extract showed the inhibition of agrA and sarA expressions in MRSA. agrA encodes accessory gene regulator A which positively regulates exotoxin-encoding genes. sarA also upregulates expression of virulence factor genes. Previous research has shown that inhibition of agrA or sarA expression by some chemicals such as thymol or clindamycin reduces transcription of exotoxin-encoding genes [21]. In the present study, suppressive effect of U. pumila extract on sea gene expression may, in part, be related with the inhibitory effect of U. pumila extract on agrA and sarA expressions [29].

In conclusion, U. pumila has antibacterial effects against MRSA, which may be related to the phytochemicals such as phenolics, steroids, or terpenoids which are highly present in U. pumila.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Yong-Ouk You and Na-Young Choi contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (no. 2012R1A1A4A01012680).

References

  1. A. Al-Habib, E. Al-Saleh, A.-M. Safer, and M. Afzal, “Bactericidal effect of grape seed extract on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. O. You, K. J. Kim, B. M. Min, and C. P. Chung, “Staphylococcus lugdunensis a potential pathogen in oral infection,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 297–302, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  3. E. A. Morell and D. M. Balkin, “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a pervasive pathogen highlights the need for new antimicrobial development,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 223–233, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Dulon, F. Haamann, C. Peters, A. Schablon, and A. Nienhaus, “Mrsa prevalence in european healthcare settings: a review,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, article 138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Coughenour, V. Stevens, and L. D. Stetzenbach, “An evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus survival on five environmental surfaces,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 457–461, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. B. Rice, “Antimicrobial resistance in gram positive bacteria,” Americarl Journal of Infection Control, vol. 34, pp. S11–S19, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. C. S. Fuda, J. F. Fisher, and S. Mobashery, “β-Lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: the adaptive resistance of a plastic genome,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 2617–2633, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Tsuchiya, M. Sato, T. Miyazaki et al., “Comparative study on the antibacterial activity of phytochemical flavanones against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Stefani and P. E. Varaldo, “Epidemiology of methicillin resistant staphylococci in Europe,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1179–1186, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. B. Kim, H.-C. Jang, H. J. Nam et al., “In Vitro Activities of 28 Antimicrobial Agents against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Tertiary-Care Hospitals in Korea: A Nationwide Survey,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1124–1127, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. R. Hafidh, A. S. Abdulamir, L. S. Vern et al., “Inhibition of growth of highly resistant bacterial and fungal pathogens by a natural product,” Open Microbiology Journal, vol. 5, pp. 96–106, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K.-J. Kim, H.-H. Yu, S.-I. Jeong, J.-D. Cha, S.-M. Kim, and Y.-O. You, “Inhibitory effects of Caesalpinia sappan on growth and invasion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K.-J. Kim, H.-H. Yu, J.-D. Cha, S.-J. Seo, N.-Y. Choi, and Y.-O. You, “Antibacterial activity of Curcuma longa L. against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 599–604, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H.-H. Yu, K.-J. Kim, J.-D. Cha et al., “Antimicrobial activity of berberine alone and in combination with ampicillin or oxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 454–461, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. W. Lee, S. N. Kim, U. K. Jee, and S. J. Hwang, “Anti-wrinkle effect of pressure sensitive adhesive hydrogel patches containing ulmi cortex extract,” Journal of Korean Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 193–199, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Y. Jeong and M. L. Kim, “Physiological activities of Ulmus pumila L. Extracts,” The Korean Journal of Food Preservatrion, vol. 19, pp. 104–109, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. K. Kim, Illustrated Natural Drugs Encyclopedia, Namsandang, Seoul, Korea, 1989.
  18. F. Wallet, M. Roussel-Delvallez, and R. J. Courcol, “Choice of a routine method for detecting methicillin resistance in staphylococci,” The Journal Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 901–909, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  19. N. A. A. Ali, W.-D. Jülich, C. Kusnick, and U. Lindequist, “Screening of Yemeni medicinal plants for antibacterial and cytotoxic activities,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S.-C. Chang, Y.-C. Chen, K.-T. Luh, and W.-C. Hsieh, “In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents, alone and in combination, against Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from blood,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 105–110, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Qiu, X. Zhang, M. Luo et al., “Subinhibitory concentrations of perilla oil affect the expression of secreted virulence factor genes in Staphylococcus aureus,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, article e16160, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Jia, Y. J. Xue, X. J. Duan, and S.-H. Shao, “Effect of cinnamaldehyde on biofilm formation and sarA expression by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 409–416, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. E. Rosato, W. A. Craig, and G. L. Archer, “Quantitation of mecA transcription in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 11, pp. 3446–3452, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. J. Houghton and A. Raman, Laboratory Handbook for the Fractionation of Natural Extracts, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1998.
  25. W. S. Woo, Experimental Methods for Phytochemistry, Seoul National University Press, Seoul, Korea, 2001.
  26. S. Shiota, M. Shimizu, T. Mizushima et al., “Marked reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of β-lactams in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus produced by epicatechin gallate, an ingredient of green tea (Camellia sinensis),” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1388–1390, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. R. Stermitz, P. Lorenz, J. N. Tawara, L. A. Zenewicz, and K. Lewis, “Synergy in a medicinal plant: antimicrobial action of berberine potentiated by 5′-methoxyhydnocarpin, a multidrug pump inhibitor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1433–1437, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Qiu, D. Wang, H. Xiang et al., “Subinhibitory concentrations of thymol reduce enterotoxins A and B and alpha-hemolysin production in Staphylococcus aureus isolates,” PloS One, vol. 5, no. 3, article e9736, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. I. Kupferwasser, M. R. Yeaman, C. C. Nast et al., “Salicylic acid attenuates virulence in endovascular infections by targeting global regulatory pathways in Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 222–233, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus