Review Article
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine Must Search Chinese Databases to Reduce Language Bias
Table 2
Comparison of SRs in TCM that searched Chinese databases with those that did not.
| | Whether Chinese databases were searched | value for differences | Yes | No |
| Number of SRs | 43 | 37 | | SRs that included Chinese authors | 41 (95.35%) | 4 (10.81%) | <0.001 | Median number of included studies (range) | 8.00 (0–75) | 6.00 (0–36) | 0.58 | Median number of studies from Chinese databases (range) | 8 (0–74) | 0 | <0.001 | Number (%) of SRs tended to support for an efficacy of TCM treatment | 15 (34.88%) | 12 (32.43%) | 0.82 | % of studies from Chinese databases (range) | 100.00% (0.00–100.00%) | 0 | <0.001 |
|
|