Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 830684 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/830684

Thomas Laurent, Yuji Okuda, Takeshi Chijimatsu, Miki Umeki, Satoru Kobayashi, Yutaro Kataoka, Iwao Tatsuguchi, Satoshi Mochizuki, Hiroaki Oda, "Freshwater Clam Extract Ameliorates Triglyceride and Cholesterol Metabolism through the Expression of Genes Involved in Hepatic Lipogenesis and Cholesterol Degradation in Rats", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 830684, 10 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/830684

Freshwater Clam Extract Ameliorates Triglyceride and Cholesterol Metabolism through the Expression of Genes Involved in Hepatic Lipogenesis and Cholesterol Degradation in Rats

Academic Editor: I-Min Liu
Received10 Sep 2012
Revised26 Dec 2012
Accepted06 Jan 2013
Published12 Feb 2013


The freshwater clam (Corbicula spp.) is a popular edible bivalve and has been used as a folk remedy for liver disease in Asia. As a Chinese traditional medicine, it is said that freshwater clam ameliorates alcoholic intoxication and cholestasis. In this study, to estimate the practical benefit of freshwater clam extract (FCE), we compared the effects of FCE and soy protein isolate (SPI) on triglyceride and cholesterol metabolism in rats. FCE and SPI lowered serum cholesterol, and FCE tended to reduce serum triglycerides. FCE enhanced fecal sterol excretion and hepatic mRNA levels of CYP7A1 and ABCG5 more substantially than SPI; however, both diets reduced hepatic cholesterol. Both of the diets similarly suppressed liver lipids improved Δ9-desaturated fatty acid profile, and FCE was associated with a reduction in FAS and SCD1 mRNA levels. Hepatic transcriptome analysis revealed that inhibition of lipogenesis-related gene expression may contribute to downregulation of hepatic triglycerides by FCE. FCE would have better potential benefits for preventing metabolic disorders, through greater improvement of metabolism of triglycerides and cholesterol, likely through a mechanism similar to SPI.

1. Introduction

Dietary factors are known to influence several risk factors for heart disease, including hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity [1, 2]. Recently, this cluster of symptoms has been attributed to a specific condition: metabolic syndrome [3]. Among nonobese and type II diabetic subjects, hepatic steatosis, which principally reflects triglyceride accumulation, is a good predictor of serum triglyceride levels [4, 5]. Hepatic fat is correlated with secretion of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs) [6]. Hepatic triglycerides participate in VLDL assembly and are associated with insulin resistance [7].

The freshwater clam (Corbicula spp.) is a popular bivalve consumed as food in Asia. Freshwater clam has been also used as a folk remedy for liver disease in East Asia. In Compendium of Materia Medica (Ben Cao Gamg Mu), which is the complete and comprehensive Chinese traditional medical book, it is described that freshwater clam ameliorates alcoholic intoxication and cholestasis. Previously, we found that freshwater clam extract (FCE) improved hepatic and serum cholesterol levels in rats with diet- and xenobiotic-induced hypercholesterolemia through the gene expression of CYP7A1, involved in the stimulation of bile acid synthesis and fecal sterol excretion [8, 9]. We have also demonstrated that FCE reduces hepatic triglycerides in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet [9, 10]. Additionally, our previous study indicated that FCE ameliorates hepatic steatosis induced by the exposure to xenobiotics [9]. However, FCE may alter the metabolism of triglycerides, but the regulation mechanism is still unclear.

Foods containing soybean are commonly consumed in Asian countries, and eating such foods is associated with a lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease [11]. Many studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of soy protein isolate (SPI), including a reduction in levels of blood cholesterol and triglycerides, particularly in hypercholesterolemic subjects, and a reduction in liver triglycerides and cholesterol in rats [1216]. Ascencio et al. demonstrated that soy protein prevented the development of hepatic steatosis through the reduction in the hepatic gene expression of lipogenic enzymes in rats [12]. However, various mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of SPI have been proposed [17].

In this study, we first compared the effects of FCE with those of SPI on the metabolism of triglycerides and cholesterol in rats in order to evaluate the practical benefits of FCE. We found that FCE and SPI had a similar effect on hepatic and serum cholesterol and hepatic triglycerides; however, FCE showed a much more powerful induction of fecal sterols excretion, suggesting that FCE improves lipid metabolism through a different mechanism from that of SPI. To compare the mechanism and function of this beneficial effect, we investigated the alteration of lipid profile in the liver of rats and then performed hepatic gene expression analysis. Finally, in the second experiment, we examined global gene expression in FCE in contrast with control diet by using microarray analysis. We found a novel effect of FCE in ameliorating triglyceride metabolism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Kits for quantification of cholesterol (T-Chol), triglycerides (Triglyceride E-test), and phospholipids (Phospholipids C-Test) were purchased from Wako Chemical Co. Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Serum adiponectin (mouse or rat adiponectin) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was obtained from Otsuka Pharmaceutical (Tokyo, Japan). Megaprime DNA labeling system was purchased from Amersham (Tokyo, Japan). High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit and Power SYBR Master Mix were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Agilent Low RNA Input Fluor Linear Amp Kit was purchased from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.2. Materials

FCE was prepared as described previously [8, 9]. Briefly, freshwater clams (Corbicula spp.) were steamed until the shells opened, and the edible portion was removed. The edible portion was minced, extracted with boiling water, and then filtered through an 80-mesh filter. The filtrate was spray-dried for use as the FCE. The FCE yield from the raw material was approximately 1.5% (w/w). FCE contains not only water-soluble materials but also approximately 35% water-insoluble materials. The approximate composition of the FCE was 59.8 g protein, 11.6 g carbohydrate, 4.8 g moisture, 18.2 g crude fat, and 5.6 g ash per 100 g of powder [18]. The amino acid profile of FCE has been compared with that of casein [18], and we concluded that the profiles were closely similar.

2.3. Animals and Diets

Four-week-old male Wistar rats with a body weight of about 100 g were obtained from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). The animals were maintained at 23°C with a 12 h light (0800 to 2000) and 12 h dark (2000 to 0800) cycle. To accustom the rats to the experimental conditions, we fed them a commercial stock diet (5L37; Japan SLC Inc.) for 4 days and then a basal diet containing 20% casein for 3 days before dividing them into groups of 6 animals each. The composition of the experimental diets is shown in Table 1. Previously, we investigated the effect of FCE on hypercholesterolemia in rats [810]. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the potential beneficial effect of FCE for preventing lifestyle-related diseases. In the first experiment, the animals were fed a basal diet (control group), a basal diet supplemented with 30 g FCE per 100 g food (FCE group), or a basal diet supplemented with 19.9 g SPI per 100 g food (SPI group) for 2 weeks. In the second experiment, the animals were fed a basal diet (control group) or a basal diet supplemented with 30 g FCE per 100 g food (FCE group) for 2 weeks. FCE or SPI was added to the basal diet at the expense of casein, sucrose, and α-cornstarch (Table 1). Total energy and protein amounts were equilibrated between groups. The same amounts of dietary proteins were introduced in the diet equally because the protein fraction is a major component of FCE and has hypocholesterolemic function [10]. During the study, the rats were maintained in individual stainless-steel cages and had free access to the experimental diets and water. Feces were collected over the final 3 days of the experimental period and used for determining fecal sterols. All the experiments were performed in accordance with an animal protocol approved by the Review Board for Animal Ethics at Oita University (permission number E048001) and Nagoya University (permission number 2008071601).

Control groupaFCE groupaSPI groupa

Corn oil505050
Choline chloride222
AIN-93G-MX mineral mixture353535
AIN-93-VX vitamin mixture101010

Control group: the basal diet; FCE group: freshwater clam extract diet; SPI group: soy protein isolate diet.   
Protein content: 89.6%.  
Protein content: 59.8%.  
Protein content: 90.0%.

2.4. Biochemical Analyses

Blood samples were collected from the tail vein. About 2.5 g of liver tissue was homogenized, and the lipids were extracted using a chloroform/methanol mixture (2 : 1, v/v) as described by Folch et al. [19]. Serum and hepatic cholesterol and triglyceride, hepatic phospholipids, and serum adiponectin levels were determined using a commercial kit. Hepatic fatty acid content was analyzed as follows. Tricosanoic acid was added to the extracted lipids to be used as an internal standard. The mixture was dried under a flow of dry nitrogen gas at 37°C. Lipids were converted to methyl ester by the addition of 0.5 mL 5% hydrogen chloride-methanol solution and incubation at 75°C for 3 h. The samples were injected in a 25 m × 0.25-mm SGE-BPX70 capillary column (SGE, Victoria, Australia) and analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMD-QP5000; Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). Fecal sterols were extracted using the method of Delaney et al. [20]. Fecal neutral sterols were analyzed as trimethylsilyl ester by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC 6890 equipped with 5973MSD and a 30 m × 0.25 mm HP-5 MS capillary column; Agilent) with 5α-cholestane as the internal standard. Fecal bile acids were determined enzymatically by using the method of Sheltawy and Losowsky [21], with lithocholic acid as the standard.

2.5. Total RNA Extraction and RNA Analysis

Total RNA from liver tissue was isolated according to the method described by Chomczynski and Sacchi [22], and 20 μg total RNA was subjected to northern blot hybridization. The cDNA clones of rat apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, rat CYP7A1, rat ATP-binding cassette subfamily member 5 (ABCG5), rat fatty acid synthase (FAS), rat acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha (ACACA), rat fatty acid-binding protein 2 intestinal (FABP2), rat fatty acid-binding protein 5 epidermal (FABP5), rat sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1), rat stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD1), and mouse apoE were labeled with the Megaprime DNA labeling system and used for hybridization. Specific hybridization was quantified using an image analyzer (BAS 2000; Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan). In our previous studies, apoE mRNA level was not affected by the diet [810]. Moreover, the apoE mRNA level was not affected by any treatment used in this study (data not shown); thus, we used it as a normalization standard. For real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay, cDNA was prepared using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. The forward and reverse primer sequences used in the qRT-PCR assay were as follows: rat long-chain fatty acid elongase family member 6 (ELOVL6) forward primer, 5′-ACCCGAACTAGGTGATACG-3′; rat ELOVL6 reverse primer, 5′-CCCAGCTACCATGTCTTTG-3′; rat apoE forward primer, 5′-TTGGTCCCATTGCTGACAGG-3′; rat apoE reverse primer, 5′-GGTAATCCCAGAAGCGGTTC-3′. qRT-PCR amplifications were performed in an ABI StepOne (Applied Biosystems) in a reaction mixture of 20 μL, which contained 8 μL 80 × diluted cDNA, 10 μL 2 × Power SYBR Master Mix, and 200 nM of each primer. The qRT-PCR melting curve data were collected to check for PCR specificity. Expression was calculated using the standard curve method. In addition, the expression of the chosen genes was normalized to that of apoE as an internal control.

2.6. Estimation of the Transcription Rate of the CYP7A1 Gene

To estimate the transcription rate of the CYP7A1 gene, we used the method described by Ripperger and Schibler [23]. We quantified CYP7A1 pre-mRNA levels by real-time RT-PCR as described above. The primers were designed within intron 5 of the CYP7A1 gene. The cDNA was PCR-amplified in ABI StepOne (Applied Biosystems). The primers used were as follows: rat pre-mRNA of CYP7A1 forward, 5′-GAGTAGTATTTGGGAGGGATC-3′; rat pre-mRNA for CYP7A1 reverse, 5′-TGAATGTGTGTTTGCTGAGGC-3′. The relative amount of CYP7A1 pre-mRNA was normalized with apoE mRNA as measured by qRT-PCR.

2.7. Microarray Analysis

The total RNA from liver tissue of the control group ( ) and FCE group ( ) was pooled separately in identical amounts for analysis. Next, 500 ng of total RNA was used for fluorescently labeled cRNA synthesis with Agilent Low RNA Input Fluor Linear Amp Kit, by following the manufacturer’s protocol. For hybridization, 0.75 μg Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cRNA from the control and FCE groups was combined and hybridized to an Agilent 22 K rat oligo microarray according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Hokkaido System Science Co. Ltd., Sapporo, Japan). The oligonucleotide microarray slides were scanned using an Agilent microarray scanner, and the gene expression profiles were analyzed with Agilent microarray software. Locally weighted scatter plot smoothing normalization and ratio (FCE/control) calculation were conducted using the GeneSpring software (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Genes were considered upregulated if they had a ratio (FCE/control) of more than 1.46 and downregulated if they had a ratio of less than 0.68. Network analysis and biofunction analysis were performed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA, USA) with differentially expressed gene expression values. Biofunctions were filtered according to values of <.001. Functional analysis of all differentially expressed genes was performed using the database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery (DAVID) resource (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). The functional annotation clusters are shown as KEGG pathways that had a value of less than .05.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The significance of differences among values was analyzed by the Student’s -test or one-way analysis of variance and then by Tukey’s multiple-range test. The analyses were performed using SPSS version 10.0 (SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan). When the value was less than .05, differences were considered significant. Values are expressed as means ± SEM.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight Gain, Food Intake, Organ Weight, and Serum Parameters

Body weight was slightly decreased in the SPI group, but the food intake was not affected by the diets (Table 2). Liver weight was lower in the SPI group than in the control and FCE groups. Epididymal adipose tissue weight was not affected by the diets. The FCE and SPI groups showed significantly reduced serum cholesterol levels (Table 2). Serum triglycerides tended to be lower in the FCE group than in the control and SPI groups; however, the change was not significant (Table 2). SPI elevated the serum level of adiponectin, and FCE showed a tendency to increase this parameter, but this was not significant (Table 2).

Control groupbFCE groupbSPI groupb
Mean ± SEMMean ± SEMMean ± SEM

Body weight gain (g)71.3 ± 3.4ab77.3 ± 2.9b64.8 ± 2.2a
Food intake (g/d)c14.7 ± 0.6 13.3 ± 0.5 14.1 ± 0.5
Relative organ weight
(g/100 g of body weight)
 Liver3.40 ± 0.08b3.44 ± 0.06b2.66 ± 0.04a
 Epididymal adipose tissue1.52 ± 0.051.37 ± 0.051.10 ± 0.24
Serum lipids (mmol/L)
 Total cholesterol2.28 ± 0.10b1.56 ± 0.06a1.56 ± 0.04a
 Triglyceride0.65 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.02
Serum adiponectin (ng/mL)4426 ± 293a5562 ± 476a7212 ± 310b
Dry fecal weight (g for 3d)d1.2 ± 0.1a3.2 ± 0.3c1.7 ± 0.0b
Fecal steroids ( mol/3 days)
 Total neutral sterol29.5 ± 3.6a119 ± 10b42.5 ± 2.8a
 Total bile acids 36.3 ± 4.4a247 ± 18b51.7 ± 3.2a
Hepatic transcription rate (arbitrary units)e
 CYP7A1100 ± 19a303 ± 47b152 ± 26a

aEach value is the mean with its standard error for 6 rats in each dietary group. The statistical significance of differences among values was analyzed by ANOVA and then by Tukey’s multiple-range test. Values in a row with different letters indicate a statistically significant difference, P < .05.
bControl group: basal diet; FCE group: freshwater clam extract-supplemented diet; SPI group: soy protein isolate-supplemented diet.
cFood intake was measured from day 2 to day 3.
dFeces were collected over the final 3 days of the experimental period.
eTranscription rate was estimated by the pre-mRNA level.
3.2. FCE Improved Cholesterol Metabolism Similar to SPI

The hepatic cholesterol-lowering effect of FCE was similar with that of SPI (Figure 1(a)). FCE induced fecal excretion of neutral and acidic steroids much more potently than SPI (Table 2). From these data, we inferred that FCE had a more powerful effect on cholesterol catabolism than SPI. We confirmed that FCE induced hepatic CYP7A1 gene expression, the rate-limiting enzyme for bile acid biosynthesis (Figure 2(a)) [8]. Although SPI was reported to induce CYP7A1 gene expression, the induction was smaller than that by FCE (Figure 2(a)). The transcription rate of the CYP7A1 gene was evaluated by measuring the pre-mRNA level of the CYP7A1 gene, and we found that FCE induced hepatic CYP7A1 gene transcription more than SPI (Table 2). As we reported [10], FCE induced hepatic ABCG5 gene expression, and SPI tended to increase this gene expression; however, the change was not significant (Figure 2(a)).

3.3. FCE May Ameliorate Triglyceride Metabolism through the Inhibition of Lipogenesis in the Liver

Hepatic triglycerides were lower in rats fed both FCE and SPI (Figure 1(a)). C16:0/C16:1 fatty acid elongation and monodesaturation of C18:0 and C16:0 were previously reported to be related to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism and lipogenesis in the liver [24]. Thus, we evaluated changes in the elongation and Δ9-desaturation of these fatty acids by measuring the fatty acid profile in rat liver. The C18:0/C16:0 ratio was higher in the SPI group than in the control and FCE groups, and the C18:1/C16:1 ratio was not affected in either the SPI or FCE group (Figure 1(b)). However, the 16 : 1/16 : 0 and 18 : 1/18 : 0 ratios were significantly lower in the FCE and SPI groups than in the control group (Figure 1(b)). To gain a deeper insight into the regulation of lipogenesis in the liver, we measured the mRNA levels of SCD1 and ELOVL6, which are involved in the Δ9-desaturation of C16:0 and C18:0 and elongation of C16:0 and C16:1, respectively. Although ELOVL6 mRNA level tended to be lower in the SPI and FCE groups, the differences were not significant (Figure 2(a)). SCD1 mRNA level was significantly decreased by FCE, but not by SPI (Figure 2(a)). Downregulation of SCD1 mRNA level was in accordance with the C18:1/C18:0 and C16:1/C16:0 ratios (Figures 1(b) and 2(a)). Moreover, gene expression of FAS, a lipogenic multienzyme, was significantly suppressed by FCE and tended to be reduced in SPI, although this was not significant (Figure 2(a)). Altogether, we conclude that both FCE and SPI reduced hepatic triglycerides through a similar mechanism, which involves the inhibition of the expression of lipogenic genes.

3.4. Analysis of Hepatic Transcriptome in Rats Fed FCE Revealed the Alteration of Gene Expression in Fatty Acid Synthesis and Transport

To gain an insight into the mechanism of the effect of FCE on lipid metabolism in the liver, we used oligonucleotide microarray to investigate gene expression in rats fed the basal and FCE diets in a second animal experiment. The microarray results showed that FCE downregulated the expression of 210 genes and upregulated the expression of 182 genes. Using IPA, analysis of biofunctions indicated significant changes in several functions, particularly lipid and drug metabolism (Table 3). Analysis of pathways by using DAVID indicated an induction of bile acid biosynthesis and an inhibition of polyunsaturated fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis (Table 3). Further analysis of subcategories of lipid metabolism by IPA indicated that fatty acid synthesis and transport and cholesterol and bile acid biosynthesis had values less than .05 (see Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830684.) To validate the significance of the microarray results, we selected appropriate genes in subcategories in Supplementary Table S1 and measured liver gene expression (Figure 2(b)). The changes in gene expression observed in Figure 2(a) were also validated in this experiment (data not shown). We found that the mRNA level of ACACA, also involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, was notably reduced by FCE and that the expression of FABP2 and FAPB5 was reduced by FCE (Figure 2(b)). Apo A-I mRNA, which is involved in lipid transport, was also suppressed by FCE. These results obtained with northern blotting and real-time RT-PCR were in agreement with the microarray data (Supplementary Information, Table S1). Although SREBP-1, a key transcription factor involved in lipogenesis, tended to decrease in the FCE group, the difference was not significant in our experiment (Figure 2(b)).

CategoryP valueGeneUpregulated genesDownregulated genes

 Lipid metabolism 834241
 Small molecule biochemistry 1035548
 Vitamin and mineral metabolism 341816
 Drug metabolism 26215
 Molecular transport 643430
 Nucleic acid metabolism 16610
 Carbohydrate metabolism 391722
 Cell death 21192
 Amino acid metabolism 17152
 Cell cycle 1073
 Cellular assembly and organization 927
 Gene expression 15114
 Cellular function and maintenance 761
 Cellular compromise 963
 Cellular growth and proliferation 431
 Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction 743
KEGG pathwaysb
 Polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis 707
 Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 12120
 Biosynthesis of steroids 707
 C21-steroid hormone metabolism 532
 Androgen and estrogen metabolism 963
 PPAR signaling pathway 918
 Linoleic acid metabolism 660
 Alanine and aspartate metabolism 633
 Maturity onset diabetes of the young 505
 Pyruvate metabolism 614
 Bile acid biosynthesis 541
 Glutathione metabolism 541
 Carbon fixation 413
 Nitrogen metabolism 422

We compared the effect of the FCE diet on hepatic gene expression with that of control by using oligonucleotide microarray.
aDifferentially expressed gens list from microarray experiment was imported in Ingenuity pathway analysis, filtered by selecting only genes expressed in rat liver. Significance values expressed as P values were calculated using a right-tailed Fisher's exact test. Biofunctions that were significantly changed were determined.
bWe conducted KEGG pathway analysis by importing a list of differentially expressed genes in DAVID (database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery). Significance values expressed as P values were calculated using a modified Fisher exact probability test (EASE score).

4. Discussion

We previously demonstrated that an FCE diet improves blood cholesterol in rats with hypercholesterolemia [8, 9]. Our previous results suggest that this is due to an increase in the fecal excretion of bile acids and the cholesterol degradation to bile acid through enhancement of CYP7A1 gene expression in the liver. Moreover, hepatic lipids were reduced by FCE in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet [9]. SPI affects serum triglycerides and cholesterol through several mechanisms, including a reduction in the insulin/glucagon ratio and a reduction in intestinal cholesterol absorption and bile acid uptake, conversion of cholesterol to bile acids [12, 25]. SPI also decreases hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels. As it was suggested that SPI has a similar effect to FCE on lipid balance, in the present study, we compared the ability of FCE to improve the metabolism of triglycerides and cholesterol in rat liver to that of SPI and investigated the mechanism of FCE effect.

FCE and SPI improved serum total cholesterol in a similar fashion, and FCE tended to reduce serum triglyceride level (Table 2). Since both diets improved liver cholesterol similarly, we compared the effect of FCE on cholesterol catabolism with that of SPI. We found that fecal excretion of both bile acids and neutral sterols and the hepatic expression of CYP7A1 and ABCG5 were importantly elevated in rats fed FCE only, as reported previously (Table 2 and Figure 2(a)) [10]. SPI has been reported to increase CYP7A1 gene expression and fecal sterol [26], although in this study, this increase was not significant for SPI (Table 2 and Figure 2(a)). CYP7A1 mRNA was also reflected at the transcription level by measuring the pre-mRNA level of this gene (Table 2). The main transcription factors, which were involved in the regulation of this gene, such as small heterodimer partner, liver X receptor, and farnesoid X receptor, were not altered by FCE (data not shown), as reported previously [9]. From the above results, we conclude that the increase in both CYP7A1 and ABCG5 mRNA levels can explain the increase in fecal excretion of acidic and neutral sterols in the FCE group.

Serum triglycerides tended to be lower in FCE (Table 2), although the differences were not significant. In rats fed FCE and SPI, we also observed a significant decrease in hepatic triglycerides (Figure 1(a)). C16:0/C16:1 fatty acid elongation and monodesaturation of C18:0 and C16:0 were related to fatty acid metabolism regulation and lipogenesis in the liver [24]. SCD1 is an important enzyme that participates in Δ9-desaturation of palmitate and stearate [27]. ELOVL6 catalyzes the elongation of palmitate and palmitoleate and thus plays a central role in the de novo synthesis of long-chain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids [28]. ELOVL6 and SCD1 genes are related to hepatosteatosis, obesity, and insulin resistance, all of which are associated with metabolic syndrome [24, 29]. Thus, we investigated the C16:0/C16:1 fatty acid elongation (regulated by ELOVL6) and monodesaturation of C18:0 and C16:0 (regulated by SCD1) by evaluating hepatic fatty acid composition in rats fed FCE or SPI. The results revealed that Δ9-desaturation but not elongation may be inhibited by FCE and SPI (Figure 1(b)), which correlated well with mRNA levels of ELOVL6 and SCD1 (Figure 2(a)). It has been reported that knockdown of SCD1 leads to the reduction of liver triglyceride, plasma triglycerides and VLDLs, and the increase insulin sensitivity [30, 31]. Downregulation of SCD1 expression by both FCE and SPI would be responsible for the changes in fatty acid composition in the rat liver. Although previous studies indicated that feeding soy protein reduced SCD 1 gene expression and improved insulin sensitivity [32, 33], the effect of FCE on insulin sensitivity and diabetes has not been determined. Moreover, lipogenesis-related FAS gene expression was downregulated in FCE and tended to be reduced in SPI (Figure 2(a)). SPI can reduce the expression of several genes associated with lipogenesis, such as SREBP-1, FAS, and malic enzyme [12, 17]. Altogether, we conclude that FCE exerts an important effect on the metabolism of triglycerides in the liver in a similar manner to SPI, which involves inhibition of lipogenic gene expression and results in the reduction of hepatic triglycerides. FCE contains fats and proteins, and the FCE protein profile is similar to that of casein. Thus, we supposed that FCE would act through a different mechanism from that of SPI.

Moreover, transcriptome analysis of gene expression by IPA revealed that synthesis of fatty acids (FAS, ACACA, and SCD1) was downregulated in FCE (Table 3 and Supplementary Information, Table S1). We confirmed that the gene expression of ACACA, involved in the rate-limiting step of fatty acid synthesis, was significantly reduced in FCE and correlated with the FAS mRNA level (Figure 2(b)). This suggests that fatty acid synthesis-related gene expression is inhibited by FCE, which may result in decrease in triglyceride assembly.

FABPs have been linked to lipid-related diseases such as hyperlipidemia [34, 35]. Gene expression analysis with IPA revealed that transport of fatty acids (FABP2, FABP5) was downregulated in FCE (Table 3 and Supplementary Information, Table S1). Although little is known about the function of FABP2 in the liver, there is evidence that Ala54Thr polymorphism of FABP2 gene has a role in insulin resistance and obesity [34]. In addition, FABP2 gene expression was upregulated in steatohepatitic mice, and this elevation was correlated with an increase in long-chain fatty acid uptake [36]. FABP5 knockout mice showed an improvement in plasma triglycerides and cholesterol, as well as insulin resistance [35]. From these results, we conclude that the hepatic triglyceride-lowering effect of FCE would be explained by changes in gene expression during fatty acid synthesis (FAS, ACC, and SCD1) and fatty acid signaling (FABP2, FABP5). Further investigations are needed to elucidate this possible mechanism.

Adiponectin is intimately involved in the improvement of insulin resistance and lipid accumulation [37]. As a consequence, serum adiponectin exerts a beneficial effect on metabolic syndrome [37]. Serum adiponectin was enhanced by SPI and tended to be elevated in FCE; however, this was not significant (Table 2). SPI and high-cholesterol diet supplemented with FCE have been demonstrated to increase serum adiponectin [10, 38].

IPA network analysis revealed a putative mechanism through which SREBP-1 downregulation could affect the expression of multiple genes associated with the synthesis of bile acids, cholesterol, and fatty acids (Supplementary Information, Figure S1). The mRNA level of SREBP-1 tended to decrease in FCE, although the difference was not significant (Figure 2(b)). SREBP is synthesized in its precursor form and inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Then, it is activated by proteolysis in response to the sterol status [39]. A recent report showed that SREBP-1c processing is downregulated by insulin [40]. Thus, we believe that FCE may be involved in the regulation of SREBP-1 processing. We are now investigating the processing. We at present hypothesize that SREBP-1 would be associated with the regulation of lipid metabolism by FCE.

5. Conclusion

In this study, we attempted to characterize the effect of FCE on lipid metabolism, particularly on the metabolism of triglycerides in the rat liver, in contrast with the effect of SPI. In doing so, we found potential benefits of FCE for ameliorating metabolic syndrome owing to its ability to improve the levels of blood and hepatic cholesterol and hepatic triglycerides. FCE has a powerful effect on cholesterol catabolism, as evidenced by the induction in the expression of genes related to cholesterol catabolism, and excretion of fecal sterols. FCE displayed an effect in improving metabolism of triglycerides similar to SPI, through the suppression of gene expression related to lipogenesis. Our data brought evidence that fatty acid Δ9-desaturation may have an important role in ameliorating hepatic triglycerides by FCE. Global analysis of hepatic gene expression proposed that SREBP-1 would be a central regulator of the metabolism of triglycerides and cholesterol in rats fed FCE. We currently perform further experiments in which the effect of FCE on protein level and activity of SREBP is studied. Although our results support the conclusion that FCE would have potential benefits for preventing metabolic syndrome, further studies are needed to indicate direct evidence for metabolic syndrome, such as the effect on obesity, diabetes, and insulin resistance.

Conflict of Interests

None of the authors have any conflict of interests to declare.


This research received no specific grant from other institutions.

Supplementary Materials

Subcategories of biofunctions related to the metabolisms of fatty acid and cholesterol were affected by FCE (Table S1).

Schematic illustration of the hypothetical mechanism of FCE ameliorative action on cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism (Figure S1).

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. S. Yu-Poth, G. Zhao, T. Etherton, M. Naglak, S. Jonnalagadda, and P. M. Kris-Etherton, “Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's step I and step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 632–646, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. M. Krauss, R. J. Deckelbaum, N. Ernst et al., “Dietary guidelines for healthy American adults: a statement for health professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1795–1800, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. H. Eckel, S. M. Grundy, and P. Z. Zimmet, “The metabolic syndrome,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9468, pp. 1415–1428, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. K. Hae, J. K. Hyeong, E. L. Kwang et al., “Metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese, nondiabetic adults,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 164, no. 19, pp. 2169–2175, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. G. S. Toledo, A. D. Sniderman, and D. E. Kelley, “Influence of hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) on severity and composition of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1845–1850, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Adiels, J. Westerbacka, A. Soro-Paavonen et al., “Acute suppression of VLDL1 secretion rate by insulin is associated with hepatic fat content and insulin resistance,” Diabetologia, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2356–2365, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Adiels, M. R. Taskinen, and J. Borén, “Fatty liver, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Chijimatsu, I. Tatsuguchi, K. Abe, H. Oda, and S. Mochizuki, “A freshwater clam (Corbicula fluminea) extract improves cholesterol metabolism in rats fed on a high-cholesterol diet,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 2566–2571, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Chijimatsu, I. Tatsuguchi, H. Oda, and S. Mochizuki, “A freshwater clam (Corbicula fluminea) extract reduces cholesterol level and hepatic lipids in normal rats and xenobiotics-induced hypercholesterolemic rats,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 3108–3112, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Chijimatsu, M. Umeki, Y. Okuda, K. Yamada, H. Oda, and S. Mochizuki, “The fat and protein fractions of freshwater clam (Corbicula fluminea) extract reduce serum cholesterol and enhance bile acid biosynthesis and sterol excretion in hypercholesterolaemic rats fed a high-cholesterol diet,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 526–534, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. M. Sacks, A. Lichtenstein, L. Van Horn, W. Harris, P. Kris-Etherton, and M. Winston, “Soy protein, isoflavones, and cardiovascular health: a summary of a statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1689–1692, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Ascencio, N. Torres, F. Isoard-Acosta, F. J. Gómez-Pérez, R. Hernández-Pando, and A. R. Tovar, “Soy protein affects serum insulin and Hepatic SREBP-1 mRNA and reduces fatty liver in rats,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 522–529, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  13. L. Azadbakht, M. Kimiagar, Y. Mehrabi et al., “Soy inclusion in the diet improves features of the metabolic syndrome: a randomized crossover study in postmenopausal women,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 735–741, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. Oda, H. Fukui, Y. Hitomi, and A. Yoshida, “Alteration of serum lipoprotein metabolism by polychlorinated biphenyls and methionine in rats fed a soybean protein diet,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 925–933, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Sugano, Y. Yamada, K. Yoshida, Y. Hashimoto, T. Matsuo, and M. Kimoto, “The hypocholesterolemic action of the undigested fraction of soybean protein in rats,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 72, no. 2-3, pp. 115–122, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. M. Potter, “Overview of proposed mechanisms for the hypocholesterolemic effect of soy,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 125, no. 3, supplement, pp. 606S–611S, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. J. Ronis, Y. Chen, J. Badeaux, and T. M. Badger, “Dietary soy protein isolate attenuates metabolic syndrome in rats via effects on PPAR, LXR, and SREBP signaling,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 1431–1438, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Chijimatsu, A. Yamada, H. Miyaki et al., “Effect of freshwater clam (Corbicula fluminea) extract on liver function in rats,” Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 63–68, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Folch, M. Lees, and G. H. Sloane Stanley, “A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 497–509, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. Delaney, R. J. Nicolosi, T. A. Wilson et al., “β-glucan fractions from barley and oats are similarly antiatherogenic in hypercholesterolemic Syrian golden hamsters,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 468–475, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. J. Sheltawy and M. S. Losowsky, “Determination of faecal bile acids by an enzymic method,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. Chomczynski and N. Sacchi, “Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 156–159, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. A. Ripperger and U. Schibler, “Rhythmic CLOCK-BMAL1 binding to multiple E-box motifs drives circadian Dbp transcription and chromatin transitions,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 369–374, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. Matsuzaka and H. Shimano, “Elovl6: a new player in fatty acid metabolism and insulin sensitivity,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 379–384, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Nagaoka, T. Awano, N. Nagata, M. Masaoka, G. Hori, and K. Hashimoto, “Serum cholesterol reduction and cholesterol absorption inhibition in CaCo-2 cells by a soyprotein peptic hydrolyzate,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 354–356, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  26. I. Ikeda, M. Kudo, T. Hamada et al., “Dietary soy protein isolate and its undigested high molecular fraction upregulate hepatic ATP-binding cassette transporter G5 and ATP-binding cassette transporter G8 mRNA and increase biliary secretion of cholesterol in rats,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 252–256, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Cohen and J. M. Friedman, “Leptin and the control of metabolism: role for stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD-1),” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 9, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. A. Jakobsson, R. Westerberg, and A. Jacobsson, “Fatty acid elongases in mammals: their regulation and roles in metabolism,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 237–249, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Yasari, D. Wang, D. Prud'homme, M. Jankowski, J. Gutkowska, and J. M. Lavoie, “Exercise training decreases plasma leptin levels and the expression of hepatic leptin receptor-a, -b, and, -e in rats,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 324, no. 1-2, pp. 13–20, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Chu, M. Miyazaki, W. C. Man, and J. M. Ntambi, “Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 deficiency protects against hypertriglyceridemia and increases plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol induced by liver X receptor activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 6786–6798, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Gutiérrez-Juárez, A. Pocai, C. Mulas et al., “Critical role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase—1 (SCD1) in the onset of diet-induced hepatic insulin resistance,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1686–1695, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. R. Tovar, I. Torre-Villalvazo, M. Ochoa et al., “Soy protein reduces hepatic lipotoxicity in hyperinsulinemic obese Zucker fa/fa rats,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1823–1832, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. Lavigne, A. Marette, and H. Jacques, “Cod and soy proteins compared with casein improve glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in rats,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. E491–E500, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. Albala, J. L. Santos, M. Cifuentes et al., “Intestinal FABP2 A54T polymorphism: association with insulin resistance and obesity in women,” Obesity Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 340–345, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  35. K. Maeda, K. T. Uysal, L. Makowski et al., “Role of the fatty acid binding protein mal1 in obesity and insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Ge, S. Zhou, C. Hu, H. Lobdell, and P. D. Berk, “Insulin- and leptin-regulated fatty acid uptake plays a key causal role in hepatic steatosis in mice with intact leptin signaling but not in ob/ob or db/db mice,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 299, no. 4, pp. G855–G866, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. Okamoto, S. Kihara, T. Funahashi, Y. Matsuzawa, and P. Libby, “Adiponectin: a key adipocytokine in metabolic syndrome,” Clinical Science, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 267–278, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Nagasawa, K. Fukui, M. Kojima et al., “Divergent effects of soy protein diet on the expression of adipocytokines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 311, no. 4, pp. 909–914, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. X. Wang, R. Sato, M. S. Brown, X. Hua, and J. L. Goldstein, “SREBP-1, a membrane-bound transcription factor released by sterol-regulated proteolysis,” Cell, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  40. C. R. Yellaturu, X. Deng, E. A. Park, R. Raghow, and M. B. Elam, “Insulin enhances the biogenesis of nuclear sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1c by posttranscriptionaldown-regulation of insig-2A and its dissociation from SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP)·SREBP-1c complex,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 46, pp. 31726–31734, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Thomas Laurent et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.