Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 105186, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/105186
Research Article

Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Wikipedia: Opportunities for Improvement

1Department of Medical Research, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi 62247, Taiwan
2Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7

Received 25 February 2014; Revised 31 March 2014; Accepted 3 April 2014; Published 17 April 2014

Academic Editor: Jenny M. Wilkinson

Copyright © 2014 Malcolm Koo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Wikipedia, “Statistics,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics.
  2. Wikipedia, “WikiProject Medicine/Popular pages,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Popular_pages.
  3. M. R. Laurent and T. J. Vickers, “Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 471–479, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Karp and A. F. Monroe, “Quality of healthcare information on the Internet: caveat emptor still rules,” Managed Care Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 3–8, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Pilkington, A. Gamst, I. Liu, T. Ostermann, D. Pinto, and J. Richardon, “The International Collaboration on Complementary Therapy Resources (ICCR): working together to improve online CAM information,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 647–653, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. R. Thomas, L. Eng, J. F. de Wolff, and S. C. Grover, “An evaluation of Wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 159–163, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. Wikipedia, “List of branches of alternative medicine,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_branches_of_alternative_medicine.
  8. Wikipedia, “WikiProject Alternative medicine,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_medicine.
  9. P. R. Fitzsimmons, B. D. Michael, J. L. Hulley, and G. O. Scott, “A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information,” Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 292–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Wikipedia, “Editorial Team/Assessment,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment.
  11. A. Leithner, W. Maurer-Ertl, M. Glehr, J. Friesenbichler, K. Leithner, and R. Windhager, “Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information?” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 373–374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. McInnes and B. J. Haglund, “Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy,” Informatics for Health and Social Care, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 173–189, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. “Wiki's wild world,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7070, p. 890, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar