Polyphenols as Key Players for the Antileukaemic Effects of Propolis

Abubakar, Murtala B.; Abdullah, Wan Zaidah; Sulaiman, Siti Amrah; Ang, Boon Suen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/371730

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 371730 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/371730

Polyphenols as Key Players for the Antileukaemic Effects of Propolis

Murtala B. Abubakar,^1,2Wan Zaidah Abdullah,³Siti Amrah Sulaiman,⁴and Boon Suen Ang⁵

Academic Editor: Jairo Kenupp Bastos

Received10 Nov 2013

Revised24 Jan 2014

Accepted05 Feb 2014

Published19 Mar 2014

Abstract

Propolis (a bee product) which has a long history of medicinal use by humans has attracted a great deal of research interest in the recent time; this is due to its widely reported biological activities such as antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticarcinogenic properties. Crude form of propolis and its phenolic contents have both been reported to exhibit antileukaemic effects in various leukaemia cell lines. The ability of the polyphenols found in propolis to arrest cell cycle and induce apoptosis and differentiation in addition to inhibition of cell growth and proliferation makes them promising antileukaemic agents, and hence, they are believed to be a key to the antileukaemic effects of propolis in different types of leukaemia. This paper reviews the molecular bases of antileukaemic activity of both crude propolis and individual polyphenols on various leukaemia cell lines, and it indicates that propolis has the potential to be used in both treatment and prevention of leukaemia. This however needs further evaluation by in vitro, in vivo, and epidemiological studies as well as clinical trials.

1. Introduction

1.1. Propolis

Propolis also known as bee glue is a dark resinous substance collected by the worker bees from various plant exudates which they use to fill spaces and to coat walls of the hive for protection [1, 2]. It has a long history of medicinal use by humans [3] and has captured the attention of many researchers as a result of its antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticarcinogenic properties [4–20].

Although the constituents of the various types of propolis vary largely depending on their plant origin, their biological activities reported in the literature are however very similar. For instance, Bogdanov has reviewed that the two main propolis varieties found on the market are Baccharis and poplar, and they both possess similar biological activities even though they have different active ingredients (Table 1) [21]. Based on the plant origin where bees collect exudates for the formation of propolis, poplar and Baccharis propolis represent propolis from temperate and tropical regions, respectively, [22]. Propolis is seldom used in its crude form, but rather its concentrated ethanolic extracts obtained by extraction with 70% ethanol are used for medicinal purposes [23]. A recent review by Kurek-Górecka and colleagues has reported that about 300 compounds have been isolated from propolis and notable groups among them are phenolic acids, flavonoids, terpenes, lipid-wax substances, beeswax, bioelements, and many other constituents like vitamins, proteins, amino acids, and sugars [23]. In terms of quantity and type, phenolic compounds (polyphenols) make up the most numerous group of compounds found in propolis [23].

1.2. Polyphenols

Polyphenols (phenolic compounds) are a group of metabolites that are widely distributed in the plants and found in abundance in a variety of fruits and vegetables as well as in honey, propolis, and royal jelly [21, 24, 25]. The mechanism of anticancer activities of dietary polyphenols has been previously reviewed [26]. The biological activities of polyphenols depend on their structure [27, 28] and based on our literature search, flavonoids and phenolic acids are the two most extensively studied groups of polyphenolic contents of propolis with respect to antileukaemic activity. These two important groups of compounds are briefly discussed below.

1.2.1. Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids

Flavonoids constitute a chemical category of polyphenols with a wide variety of structure and biological activities [29]. Flavonoids are tricyclic compounds consisting of two phenolic rings designated as A and B and ring C containing a pyrane moiety, bounded through a C6-C3-C6 unit comprising 15 carbon atoms [30]. The flavonoids found in propolis are aglycones of glycosidic components of plants [23]. About 9 flavonoids were isolated from ethanolic extracts of polish propolis [31]. Based on their chemical structure, the major classes of flavonoids include flavanols, flavonols, flavones, isoflavones, anthocyanidins, dihydroflavonols, and chalcones [26, 30]. Flavonoids from dietary sources vary according to positions of hydroxyl, methoxy, and glycosidic side groups as well as in the combination between A and B rings [29].

Phenolic acids are commonly categorized into two major groups which mostly exist in the hydroxylated form, namely, hydroxybenzoic (containing seven carbon atoms-C6-C1) and hydroxycinnamic acids (containing nine carbon atoms-C6-C3) [26]; and these polyphenols and their derivatives represent the major phenolic acids found in Polish poplar type of propolis. Notable among the hydroxybenzoic derivatives are p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-methoxybenzoic acid, and gallic acid. On the other hand, the commonly encountered cinnamic acid derivatives in Polish poplar type of propolis comprised caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, isoferulic acid, and 3,4-dimethoxycinnamic acid [23].

1.2.2. Absorption and Metabolism of Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids

It is fundamental to understand the biological processes that ensue after oral ingestion of flavonoids. There is no doubt that several in vitro studies have demonstrated the biological activities of flavonoids under a variety of disease conditions including leukaemia and other malignancies. However, there is paucity of information on the current understanding of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of most flavonoids in humans with only a few like quercetin having been extensively studied [29, 30]. Therefore, in order to fully incorporate the new knowledge of antileukaemic property of propolis into subject of nutrition and medicine, the following points must be delineated as suggested by Heim and colleagues [29]: (a) the degree of absorption in relation to structure, (b) pharmacokinetics in human subjects, (c) delineating the metabolites of its phenolic contents, and (d) structure activity relationship and health effects of the phenolic metabolites. Data on absorption and metabolism of flavonoids are very complex and have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [29]. In spite of this, it is imperative to highlight some salient points about the pharmacokinetics of flavonoids. In an in vivo study in rats conducted by Bravo et al., it was demonstrated that a little fermentation of catechin and tannic acid occurred in the gut by gut flora, and this was followed by excretion of less than 5% of these compounds in the faeces unchanged, thus, suggesting that some absorption had taken place [32]. Another study by Spencer et al. has also demonstrated hydrolysis and absorption of luteolin-7glucoside, kaempferol-3-glucoside, and quercetin-3-glucoside in rats’ small intestine, thus, supporting the presence of β-glucosidase activity [33]. On the other hand, some human studies have reported that flavonoids are absorbed and metabolized following oral intake [34], whereas other studies have suggested that flavonoids are poorly absorbed and that not a significant portion of them reach the general circulation unchanged [35]. It is also important to note that the majority of investigations on pharmacological activities of flavonoids in humans mainly evaluated the metabolism of individual flavonoids used at pharmacological doses instead of estimated amounts present in dietary sources [34, 35] between 23 [36] and 170 mg daily [37]. Thus, making inferences in the results of these studies might be unfitting to describe the absorption and metabolism of dietary flavonoids [30] including those present in propolis.

1.3. Major Cellular Signaling Pathways and Mechanisms of Action of Polyphenols on Cancer and Leukaemic Cell Lines

1.3.1. Induction of Apoptosis

Apoptosis or programmed cell death is a different type of cell death characterized by both morphological and biochemical changes in the form of cell shrinkage, DNA fragmentation, membrane blebbings, chromatin condensation, and loss of adhesion and rounding [38, 39]. Under physiological conditions, apoptotic cell death is accomplished via two different mechanisms, namely, the intrinsic pathway which is mediated via the mitochondria-dependent mechanism and the extrinsic pathway which is associated with death receptor mechanism [40, 41]. The p53, IAPs, and caspase and Bcl families are some of the major proteins that regulate apoptotic cell death. The p53 gene regulates both cell cycle and apoptosis [42]. It induces cell death by stimulating the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO (mediated by Bcl-2 family) both of which are believed to be responsible for the regulation of caspases activity that eventually causes the apoptotic cell death [43, 44]. Bcl-2 family proteins are mainly found in the mitochondrial membrane and are made up of antiapoptotic (Bcl-2, Bcl-X_L, Mcl-1, and Bfl-1/A1) and proapoptotic (Bax, Bek, Bad, Bid, Bim, Puma, and Noxa) molecules. These important proteins play a vital role in mitochondria-mediated apoptotic cell death [41, 43]. The extrinsic pathway is regulated by CD95 and TRAIL which when activated bind to membrane-specific receptors such as death receptors (DRs).

The resultant interaction leads to formation of DISC which by a way of triggering the activation of caspases results in death of tumor cells without inducing inflammation or causing tissue damage [40]. IAPs are a family of molecules that exert inhibitory effects on activity of caspases 3, 7, and 9 [43]. Knowledge of molecular events in apoptosis has broadened the understanding of efficient cancer chemotherapy, and many of the reported anticancer agents destroy malignant cells by causing apoptotic cell death [39].

Flavonoids have been reported to induce apoptotic cell death in various cancer cell lines including a variety of leukemic cell lines, but sparing the normal noncancer cells. They achieve this by a number of mechanisms which include the following.(i)Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I/II activity: topoisomerases are important enzymes that play a vital role in maintaining topology of DNA during the process of DNA metabolism, that is, replication, transcription, and recombination [45]. Many studies have suggested that flavonoids might have inhibitory effects on topoisomerase enzymes [46–48]; it was demonstrated that flavonoids such as quercetin, acacetin, apigenin, kaempferol, morin, and luteolin inhibited topoisomerase I-catalyzed DNA relegation [49].(ii)Suppression of reactive oxygen species (ROS): ROS consist of free radicals (such as superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical) and nonfree radicals such as hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid [50]. ROS can cause oxidative damage to proteins, DNA, and RNA, as well as oxidation of fatty acids in cell membranes which in turn can increase the risk of mutations and promote carcinogenesis [51–54]. However, under physiological conditions, most of the injuries caused by ROS are restored by the body’s antioxidant repair system [55]. Flavonoids have been shown to exert a direct scavenging effect on ROS by donating hydrogen atom [56]. They can also suppress the generation of ROS by the inhibition of oxidases such as xanthine oxidase, cyclooxygenase, lipooxygenase, microsomal monooxygenase, NADH oxidase, and glutathione S-transferase, all of which play a crucial role in superoxide anion generation [29, 57]. Furthermore, certain flavonoids can chelate trace metals like iron and copper which results in the reduction of generation of free radicals [58].

Others. Flavonoids can also induce apoptosis by a number of mechanisms which include modulation of heat shock proteins expression [59], regulation of signaling pathways [60], release of cytochrome c leading to activation of caspases 9 and 3 [61], decreased expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X (L) but overexpression of Bax and Bak, activation of nuclear transcription factor kappaB (NF-B), stimulation of endonucleases, and downregulation of Mcl-1 protein [62–66].

1.3.2. Cell Cycle Arrest and Inhibition of Proliferation

Cell cycle is a series of molecular events of cell division during which cells increase in size and split to give rise to new daughter cells. For descriptive purposes, it is divided into 4 phases, namely, G₁ (gap 1 phase), S (synthesis phase), G₂ (gap 2 phase), and M (mitosis phase). G₁ and G₂ are two breaks with variable duration separating the S and M phases; hence, the cycle is usually summarized as G_1-S_-G₂-M [67, 68]. Abnormalities in the execution of normal cell cycle contribute significantly to the development of cancer [69, 70]. Cell cycle is regulated by two key classes of molecules, the cyclin (cyclin A-cyclin T) and the cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDK 1-CDK 9). CDK-activating kinase (CAK) also referred to as cdk7/cyclin H plays an important role in excitation of CDK/cyclin complexes. The cells usually undergo growth changes as a necessary event before S phase of the cell cycle begins, and c-myc in addition to its role in both cell cycle and cell proliferation is believed to play a key role in this important event marked by an increase in cell size [68, 71, 72]. G_o phase which is a resting stage marks the period during which cells stop undergoing cell cycle. The activity of CDKs is also regulated by two families of proteins, the INK4 family made up of , , , and which selectively inhibits CDK4 and CDK6 and the CIP/KIP family which has stimulatory effect on (a potent inhibitor of CDKs), , and [70, 73]. It is now proposed that anticancer agents that target cell cycle could magnificently determine the success of cancer chemotherapy as well as providing clues in finding a complete cure for many tumors; hence, targeting the different stages of cell cycle could play a vital role in the discovery of novel treatment options in cancer treatment [68, 70, 74].

The inhibitory effects of flavonoids such as quercetin and kaempferol on cell cycle in HL-60 and U937 leukaemic cells have been reviewed elsewhere [75]. Resveratrol has been shown to induce overexpression of cyclins A and E with subsequent arrest of HL-60 cells at S/G₂-phase transition, thus, resulting in accumulation of the cells in the G₁/S phases [76]. Flavopiridol, which is a novel semisynthetic analog of rohitukine, was shown to inhibit a number of CDKs which include CDK1, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, and CDK7 [77].

The antiproliferative activity of flavonoids is also believed to play a significant role in preventing tumor progression. A number of flavonoids have been shown to inhibit proliferation in different types of cancer cell lines such as MCF-7 human breast cancer cells [78], HT-29 human colon cancer cells [62], HL-60 leukaemia cell lines [79], and several other cancer cell lines [80]. In addition, several studies have reported that flavonoids such as quercetin, apigenin, curcumin, and nobiletin are capable of suppressing the signal transduction enzymes involved in the control of cell proliferation; such enzymes include protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) [81], protein kinase C (PKC) [82], and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIP₃) [83].

1.3.3. Antioxidant Activity

Oxidative stress as originally defined “refers to an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants on a cellular or organism level, with potentials to result in injury” [84]. Oxidative stress has been linked with the development of cancer [53, 54]. In addition to the antioxidant effects of flavonoids (direct scavenging effect on ROS, inhibition of oxidases such as xanthine oxidase, cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, microsomal monooxygenase, NADH oxidase, and glutathione S-transferase) discussed above, polyphenols are also capable of alleviating oxidative stress induced by nitric oxide (NO) which is believed to cause oxidative damage at high concentrations [58].

1.3.4. Modulation of Multidrug Resistance

Overexpression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is associated with multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer chemotherapy; this resistance can adversely affect the success of treatment of cancer [85]. The major function of Pgp, which is a plasma membrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, is extrusion of cytotoxic drugs from the cells at the expense of ATP hydrolysis [85]. As previously reviewed by Ren and colleagues, flavonoids are capable of modulating the Pgp-mediated multidrug resistance via (a) downregulation of expression of MDR-1 gene, (b) direct binding to nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) with high affinity, and (c) suppression of ATPase activity, nucleotide hydrolysis, and energy-dependent drug interaction with transporter-enriched membranes [86]. However, the role of flavonoids still requires further elucidation as contradicting results were obtained when the effects of quercetin, kaempferol, and galangin on different MDR cell lines were studied [58].

1.3.5. Promotion of Cell Differentiation

Cell differentiation is indispensable in normal growth and homeostasis. Leukaemia and some other cancer cells are incapable of differentiating into cells that exhibit mature phenotypic characteristics of nonreplication, thus, remaining in an overwhelming proliferative state with resultant outgrowing of their normal cellular counterparts [87]. Induction of cell differentiation as an alternative for control of abnormal proliferation of cancer cells has received a lot of attention by researchers; it results in elimination of cancer cells thereby reestablishing a normal cellular homeostasis [88, 89]. Commonly encountered flavonoids in propolis such as genistein, apigenin, luteolin, and quercetin have been demonstrated to induce differentiation of HL-60 leukaemia cells into mature granulocytes and monocytes [90]. Constantinou and colleagues have also demonstrated induction of differentiation of K562 leukaemia cell lines into erythroid cells by genistein [91].

1.3.6. Other Signaling Pathways

Modulation of mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK) has been established as a target for cancer therapy and the role of polyphenols in suppression of these proteins has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [92]. Regulating the activities of MAPKs plays a vital role in the control of gene expression [93].

1.4. Brief Description of Various Types of Leukemia Cell Lines Used in the Study of Antileukaemic Effects of Propolis or Its Phenolic Contents

A number of different types of leukemia cell lines representing the various subtypes of leukaemia have been used to examine the antileukaemic property of crude propolis as well as its extracts and its phenolic contents, and they include HL-60, U937, MOLT-4, NALM-6, K562, HL-205, K-562-J, RS4; 11, CEM, NB4, NALM-16, SUP-B15, and REH. We have recently reviewed the origin and characteristics of HL-60, U937, MOLT-4, NALM-6, and K562 cell lines [75]. HL-205 cells are clones of cells isolated from HL-60 cells [94]. K-562-J cells are cell clones isolated from K-562 cells [91]. RS4; 11 was originally isolated from bone marrow of a 32-year-old woman with acute leukemia and it is characterized by t(4; 11) chromosomal aberration [95]. CME, one of the earliest ALL cell lines to be established, was isolated from peripheral blood of a female child [96]. NB4 is a cell line with t(15; 17) chromosomal symbol originally isolated from the marrow of a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia in relapse [97]. NALM-16 was originally isolated from blood lymphoblasts of a female patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse [98]. SUP-B15 was originally grown from bone marrow of an 8-year-old boy with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse [99]. REH was originally isolated from the peripheral blood of a 15-year-old North African girl with ALL in relapse [100].

Owing to the role of polyphenols as antioxidants, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic agents as well as in the treatment of heart diseases [86, 101–106], they have received a lot of attention in the recent years [26].

Based on our previous review on the type of polyphenols that have been confirmed to be found in honey, available reports indicate that honey contains slightly different phenolic compounds compared with propolis [75], and at the time of such review, no report was available on the antileukaemic effects of crude honey or its extracts; hence, the present paper reviews the antileukaemic effects of propolis and its extracts as well as those phenolic compounds that have been confirmed to be present in it. It is hopeful that this will shed more light on the potential benefits of combination of honey and propolis in the prevention and/or treatment of malignancies such as leukemia. Table 1 summarizes the active ingredients of the two major types of propolis that possess anticancer and antitumor properties [22, 64, 87, 107–118].

2. Effects of Crude Propolis and Its Extracts on Various Leukemia Cell Lines

The effect of a new propolis preparation (CB propolis) isolated from Brazilian propolis on U937 human histiocytic lymphoma cells has been studied by Aso et al. and they found that crude propolis exhibited a dose and time-dependent inhibitory effect on the growth, as well as synthesis of DNA, RNA, and protein in these cells. No obvious antiproliferative effect was observed during the first 8 h of treatment of U937 cells with all the doses of propolis. However, treatment of the U937 cells with 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.5 μL/mL propolis for 3 days caused growth inhibition in the cells by 9, 25, 44, and 68%, respectively. In a similar fashion, inhibition of synthesis of DNA, RNA, and protein was also observed when the U937 cells were incubated with different doses of propolis. The authors also demonstrated two very important features of apoptosis, namely, chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation, although, they did not assay individual caspases to determine their role in the apoptotic process; they however suggested that the propolis-induced apoptosis was mediated via caspase pathways [119]. Similar findings have been reported in a different leukemia cell line, HL-60. Another Brazilian propolis extracted with water or ethanol was found to inhibit cell growth which was thought to be as a result of direct cytotoxic effect of propolis and induction of granulocytic differentiation in the HL-60 cells. Further, to establish the role of granulocytic differentiation in induction of apoptosis, features such as nuclear condensation and fragmentation, as well as DNA ladder formation were looked for under fluorescence microscope and they were found to be present, hence, confirming that the apoptosis was partly mediated by granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells [120]. These findings were confirmed and even further elaborated by the work of Motomura et al. which provided additional information on the mechanism of propolis-induced apoptosis by examining the expression of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic proteins. They demonstrated that incubation of human leukemic U937 cells with methanolic extract of propolis resulted in decreasing the expression of Bcl-2 (antiapoptotic protein) in a dose-dependent manner; however, no obvious effect was observed on the expression of Bax (a proapoptotic protein). On the basis of this, they suggested that the apoptotic cell death induced by propolis was mediated by mitochondrial mechanism. Furthermore, they observed a dose-dependent decrease in the concentration of procaspase-3 which suggested that there was activation of caspase-3 by propolis. Incubation of the U937 cells with 300 and 500 mg propolis was also demonstrated to cause cell cycle arrest as evident by upregulation of expression of p21 and p27 and downregulation of expression of cyclin A, cyclin B, Cdc2, and Cdk2, all of which are believed to play a key role in cell cycle [121].

Another interesting finding on the mechanism of propolis-induced apoptosis was reported earlier by Gunduz et al. in which they demonstrated the inhibitory effect of ethanolic extract of Manisa (Turkish) propolis on telomerase activity in T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (CCFR-CEM) cell line by determining the ratio of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (a catalytic subunit of telomerase associated with telomerase activity) which they found to be decreased from 195.56 to 13.29 after treatment of the cell with propolis; they therefore suggested that one of the mechanisms involved in propolis-induced apoptosis may be related to inhibition of telomerase activity [122]. These findings were tested in leukemia cells obtained from bone marrow of paediatric leukemia patients by Cogulu et al. They collected bone marrow from three acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and one chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and analyzed the expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) after treatment with ethanolic extract of Manisa propolis. They found a decrease in the expression of hTERT following incubation of the cells with 60 ng/mL propolis [123]. Korean propolis has also been studied by Eom and colleagues. Most of the above findings were confirmed by this study conducted using HL-60 cells treated with ethanolic extract of the Korean propolis; and they include dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation, induction of apoptosis (evident by DNA fragmentation and formation of DNA ladder), activation of caspase-3 (confirmed by the inhibition of propolis-induced cell death by a caspase-3 inhibitor known as z-DEVD-fmk), and elevated levels of cytosolic cytochrome c. Furthermore, they demonstrated a cleavage of PARP (a protein necessary for DNA repair) in propolis-treated HL-60 cells; hence, they concluded that caspase-3 activation played a significant role in propolis-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells and that the cell death was mediated by mitochondrial pathway [124].

Brazilian propolis has been well investigated in the recent years and based on its physicochemical features is classified into 13 groups [125]. The effect of ethanolic extracts of propolis group 12 (G12) also known as green propolis and propolis group 13 (G13) also termed red propolis was assessed in K562, HL-60, NB4, Ramos human Burkitt lymphoma, Raji human Burkitt lymphoma, Nalm 16, Nalm 6, RS4, B15, and REH cell lines and it was observed that both extracts from red and green propolis were cytotoxic to all the tested cells with the red propolis being more effective compared with the green propolis [125].

3. Commonly Studied Phenolic Contents of Propolis

Propolis contains a variety of polyphenols; however not all of them have been studied extensively. Table 2 shows the most commonly studied classes of phenolic contents of propolis with particular emphasis to those that have been shown to possess antileukaemic effects [24, 26, 120, 126–131]. The antileukaemic activity of quercetin, kaempferol, galangin, myricetin, apigenin, acacetin, chrysin, and luteolin has been previously discussed by our team who reported that these compounds exert antileukaemic activity through various mechanisms which include cell cycle arrest, inhibition of growth and proliferation, and induction of apoptosis and differentiation in various leukaemia cell lines [75]. However, the antileukaemic activity of genistein and cinnamic acid derivatives like baccharin, drupanin, and artepillin C which has not been previously reviewed is discussed below. Table 2 summarizes the mechanisms of action of propolis and its phenolic constituents on various types of leukaemia cell lines.

4. Antileukaemic Role of Phenolic Contents of Propolis

4.1. Baccharin and Drupanin

Baccharin ((E)-3-prenyl-4-(2, 3-dihydrocinnamoyloxy) cinnamic acid) and drupanin ((E)-3-prenyl-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) are cinnamic acid derivatives reported to be found in ethanol extract of Brazilian propolis. Akao and colleagues have examined the anticancer properties of these compounds in human leukemia (HL-60) cells. They observed growth inhibition in these cells after incubation with a dose of 150 μM of these compounds. Nuclear condensation and fragmentation with typical DNA ladder formation were also observed following 24 h treatment of these cells with the compounds; hence, it was concluded that baccharin and drupanin arrested HL-60 cells growth through induction of apoptosis [132].

4.2. Genistein

A number of studies have examined the antileukaemic effects of genistein and this isoflavone has been found to be present in a number of propolis extracts of different origins that include Argentina, Italy, Spain, and Ethiopia [133]. The anticancer property of genistein has been studied by Constantinou and coworkers using leukaemia cell lines. They reported that treatment of human myeloid HL-205 and erythroid K-562-J leukemia cells for 6 days with different doses of genistein resulted in a time- and dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth and cellular differentiation; the latter was evident by the increased percentage of the cells reacting with OKM 1 monoclonal antibody, positive staining for NSE (a usual feature of monocytes), and expression of NBT dye reduction (a symbol of granulocytic maturation) in the leukaemia cells. Although over 95% of the HL-60 cells exhibited the reaction with OKM I antibody, the percentage of cells observed to show lineage-specific markers (monocytic or granulocytic) did not surpass 50%; hence the authors suggested that genistein might have a dual biochemical effect in this circumstance, so that on the one hand it inhibited Topo II which could lead to differentiation into one phenotype and on the other hand it inhibited tyrosine kinase which could result in differentiation of the other phenotype [91]. In a similar report, Traganos and colleagues examined the antileukaemic activity of genistein on HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells. They demonstrated that genistein induced a dose- and time-dependent cell cycle arrest at G₂/M and S phases in both HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells [134]. Similar studies later confirmed the antiproliferative activity of genistein in Jurkat cells [135] and HL-60 cells [79].

Li and coworkers have recently tested the effects of genistein on ALL, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma cell lines, and they demonstrated a dose- and time-dependent inhibition of all the tested cells with RS4; 11 being the most sensitive. They further revealed that treatment of RS4; 11 cell lines with genistein repressed antiapoptotic signaling proteins by demonstrating increased cleavage products of caspases 3, 7, and 9 and PARP as well as downregulation of expression of cIAP and Bcl-2 proteins in a dose-dependent pattern. It was also found that genistein induced late apoptotic processes by demonstrating an increased population of cells with positive staining for brominated deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotide (a nucleotide that attaches to the 3′-hydroxyl ends of DNA fragments in apoptotic cells). Genistein was also demonstrated to cause cell cycle arrest at G₂/M phase as well as accumulation of cyclin B1 and upregulation of P21 and P53 genes in the tested ALL cell lines [136].

4.3. Artepillin C

Artepillin C (3,5-diprenyl-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) has been reported to be found in ethanolic extract of Brazilian green propolis [137]. Kimoto and coworkers have assessed its antitumour activity on different phenotypes of human leukaemia cell lines such as lymphocytic leukaemia (both cell lines of T-cell and B-cell), myeloid and monocytic leukaemia, and nonlymphoid nonmyeloid leukaemia cell lines and found that it induced apoptotic cell death (marked by appearance of apoptotic bodies and DNA fragmentation) in all the tested cells; and they suggested that this effect may be partly associated with upregulation of Fas expression and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential [138].

5. Conclusions

Propolis and its phenolic contents have been shown to have antileukaemic activities which are achieved through a number of mechanisms that include induction of apoptosis and differentiation, cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of growth and proliferation in various types of leukemia cell lines. This suggests that propolis and its polyphenols components may be used as effective adjuncts to chemotherapy in the treatment of cancers. However, the fact that the phenolic contents of propolis vary depending on their botanical and geographical origin signifies the need for further research to quantify individual polyphenols from different botanical sources as well as from different geographical regions. There is also the need to carry out in vivo and epidemiological studies as well as clinical trials in order to fully evaluate the potential role of this important bee product in the discovery of novel agents for both treatment and prevention of leukemia and other haematological malignancies. Furthermore, due to paucity of documented data on bioavailability and toxicity of propolis, researches on local propolis are necessary. It is also suggested that the use of propolis in combination with honey for prevention and treatment of many ailments including malignancies as practiced traditionally should be further elucidated.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant no. 304/PPSP/61312005 from Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). The authors would like to acknowledge the USM Global Fellowship awarded to the first author.

References

M. C. Marcucci, F. Ferreres, C. García-Viguera et al., “Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Castaldo and F. Capasso, “Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine,” Fitoterapia, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. S1–S6, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Trusheva, I. Todorov, M. Ninova, H. Najdenski, A. Daneshmand, and V. Bankova, “Antibacterial mono- and sesquiterpene esters of benzoic acids from Iranian propolis,” Chemistry Central Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, article 8, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Prytzyk, A. P. Dantas, K. Salomão et al., “Flavonoids and trypanocidal activity of Bulgarian propolis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 88, no. 2-3, pp. 189–193, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Dantas, K. Salomão, H. S. Barbosa, and S. L. de Castro, “The effect of Bulgarian propolis against Trypanosoma cruzi and during its interaction with host cells,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 207–211, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Salomão, P. R. Pereira, L. C. Campos et al., “Brazilian propolis: correlation between chemical composition and antimicrobial activity,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 317–324, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Uzel, K. Sorkun, Ö. Önçaǧ, D. Çoǧulu, Ö. Gençay, and B. Salih, “Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of four different Anatolian propolis samples,” Microbiological Research, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 189–195, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Silici and S. Kutluca, “Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kujumgiev, I. Tsvetkova, Y. Serkedjieva, V. Bankova, R. Christov, and S. Popov, “Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 235–240, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kumazawa, T. Hamasaka, and T. Nakayama, “Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins,” Food Chemistry, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Drago, E. de Vecchi, L. Nicola, and M. R. Gismondo, “In vitro antimicrobial activity of a novel propolis formulation (Actichelated propolis),” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1914–1921, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Amoros, F. Sauvager, L. Girre, and M. Cormier, “In vitro antiviral activity of propolis,” Apidologie, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 231–240, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
M.-R. Ahn, S. Kumazawa, T. Hamasaka, K.-S. Bang, and T. Nakayama, “Antioxidant activity and constituents of propolis collected in various areas of Korea,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 24, pp. 7286–7292, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Oršolić N and I. Bašić, “Immunomodulation by water-soluble derivative of propolis: a factor of antitumor reactivity,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Orsolic, A. H. Knezevic, L. Sver, S. Terzic, and I. Basic, “Immunomodulatory and antimetastatic action of propolis and related polyphenolic compounds,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 307–315, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Seda Vatansever, K. Sorkun, S. Ismet Deliloĝlu Gurhan et al., “Propolis from Turkey induces apoptosis through activating caspases in human breast carcinoma cell lines,” Acta Histochemica, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 546–556, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Borrelli, P. Maffia, L. Pinto et al., “Phytochemical compounds involved in the anti-inflammatory effect of propolis extract,” Fitoterapia, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. S53–S63, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tan-No, T. Nakajima, T. Shoji et al., “Anti-inflammatory effect of propolis through inhibition of nitric oxide production on carrageenin-induced mouse paw edema,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 96–99, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Paulino, S. R. L. Abreu, Y. Uto et al., “Anti-inflammatory effects of a bioavailable compound, Artepillin C, in Brazilian propolis,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 587, no. 1–3, pp. 296–301, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-R. Ahn, S. Kumazawa, Y. Usui et al., “Antioxidant activity and constituents of propolis collected in various areas of China,” Food Chemistry, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1383–1392, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bogdanov, “Propolis: biological properties and medical applications,” in The Propolis Book, chapter 2, 2012, http://www.bee-hexagon.net/en/protected-sid-UHJvcG9saXNCb29rMi5wZGY%3D.htm.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Bankova, “Recent trends and important developments in propolis research,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kurek-Górecka, A. Rzepecka-Stojko, M. Górecki, J. Stojko, M. Sosada, and G. Świerczek-Zięba, “Structure and antioxidant activity of polyphenols derived from propolis,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 78–101, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Gómez-Caravaca, M. Gómez-Romero, D. Arráez-Román, A. Segura-Carretero, and A. Fernández-Gutiérrez, “Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1220–1234, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Viuda-Martos, Y. Ruiz-Navajas, J. Fernández-López, and J. A. Pérez-Álvarez, “Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. R117–R124, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Fresco, F. Borges, C. Diniz, and M. P. M. Marques, “New insights on the anticancer properties of dietary polyphenols,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 747–766, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Geckil, B. Ates, G. Durmaz, S. Erdogan, and I. Yilmaz, “Antioxidant, free radical scavenging and metal chelating characteristics of propolis,” American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Scheller, T. Wilczok, S. Imielski, W. Krol, J. Gabrys, and J. Shani, “Free radical scavenging by ethanol extract of propolis,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 461–465, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
K. E. Heim, A. R. Tagliaferro, and D. J. Bobilya, “Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 572–584, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Cook and S. Samman, “Flavonoids—chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects, and dietary sources,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 66–76, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Maciejewicz, “Isolation of flavonoid aglycones from propolis by a column chromatography method and their identification by GC-MC and TLC methods,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1171–1179, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bravo, R. Abia, M. A. Eastwood, and F. Saura-Calixto, “Degradation of polyphenols (catechin and tannic acid) in the rat intestinal tract: effect on colonic fermentation and faecal output,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 933–946, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. E. Spencer, G. Chowrimootoo, R. Choudhury, E. S. Debnam, S. K. Srai, and C. Rice-Evans, “The small intestine can both absorb and glucuronidate luminal flavonoids,” FEBS Letters, vol. 458, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Das, “Studies on flavonoid metabolism. Absorption and metabolism of (+)-catechin in man,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3435–3445, 1971.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Gugler, M. Leschik, and H. J. Dengler, “Disposition of quercetin in man after single oral and intravenous doses,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 9, no. 2-3, pp. 229–234, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. L. Hertog, P. C. H. Hollman, M. B. Katan, and D. Kromhout, “Intake of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids and their determinants in adults in The Netherlands,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Kühnau, “The flavonoids. A class of semi-essential food components: their role in human nutrition,” World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 24, pp. 117–191, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Rich, R. L. Allen, and A. H. Wyllie, “Defying death after DNA damage,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6805, pp. 777–783, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. L. Kiechle and X. Zhang, “Apoptosis: biochemical aspects and clinical implications,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 326, no. 1-2, pp. 27–45, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Russo, A. Mupo, C. Spagnuolo, and G. L. Russo, “Exploring death receptor pathways as selective targets in cancer therapy,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 674–682, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Taylor, S. P. Cullen, and S. J. Martin, “Apoptosis: controlled demolition at the cellular level,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 231–241, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schuler and D. R. Green, “Mechanisms of p53-dependent apoptosis,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 684–688, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-M. Debatin, “Apoptosis pathways in cancer and cancer therapy,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 153–159, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schuler, E. Bossy-Wetzel, J. C. Goldstein, P. Fitzgerald, and D. R. Green, “p53 induces apoptosis by caspase activation through mitochondrial cytochrome c release,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 10, pp. 7337–7342, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Peleg, D. Bobilev, and E. Priel, “Topoisomerase I as a target of erlotinib and gefitinib: efficacy of combined treatments with camptothecin,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 934–942, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bailly, “Topoisomerase I poisons and suppressors as anticancer drugs,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–58, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sukardiman, A. Darwanto, M. Tanjung, and M. O. Darmadi, “Cytotoxic mechanism of flavonoid from Temu Kunci (Kaempferia pandurata) in cell culture of human mammary carcinoma,” Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 23, no. 2–4, pp. 185–190, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Markovits, C. Linassier, P. Fosse et al., “Inhibitory effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein on mammalian DNA topoisomerase II,” Cancer Research, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 5111–5117, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Boege, T. Straub, A. Kehr et al., “Selected novel flavones inhibit the DNA binding or the DNA religation step of eukaryotic topoisomerase I,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 4, pp. 2262–2270, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Lieberman, A. Marks, and A. Peet, “Oxygen toxicty and free radical injury,” in Marks' Basic Medical Biochemistry, pp. 437–456, LWW, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lykkesfeldt, “Malondialdehyde as biomarker of oxidative damage to lipids caused by smoking,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 380, no. 1-2, pp. 50–58, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Duthie and V. L. Dobson, “Dietary flavonoids protect human colonocyte DNA from oxidative attack in vitro,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Halliwell and J. M. C. Gutteridge, “Role of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human disease: an overview,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 186, pp. 1–85, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Halliwell, J. M. C. Gutteridge, and C. E. Cross, “Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 598–620, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Ruffin 4th. and C. L. Rock, “Do antioxidants still have a role in the prevention of human cancer?” Current Oncology Reports, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 306–313, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
Procházková, D, I. Boušová, and N. Wilhelmová, “Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of flavonoids,” Fitoterapia, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 513–523, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cos, L. Ying, M. Calomme et al., “Structure-activity relationship and classification of flavonoids as inhibitors of xanthine oxidase and superoxide scavengers,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ravishankar, A. K. Rajora, F. Greco, and H. M. Osborn, “Flavonoids as prospective compounds for anti-cancer therapy,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2821–2831, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Rong, E. B. Yang, K. Zhang, and P. Mack, “Quercetin-induced apoptosis in the monoblastoid cell line U937 in vitro and the regulation of heat shock proteins expression,” Anticancer Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4339–4345, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Yin, A. E. Giuliano, and A. J. van Herle, “Signal pathways involved in apigenin inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis of human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells (ARO),” Anticancer Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 4297–4303, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
I.-K. Wang, S.-Y. Lin-Shiau, and J.-K. Lin, “Induction of apoptosis by apigenin and related flavonoids through cytochrome c release and activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 in leukaemia HL-60 cells,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1517–1525, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Wenzel, S. Kuntz, M. D. Brendel, and H. Daniel, “Dietary flavone is a potent apoptosis inducer in human colon carcinoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 14, pp. 3823–3831, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Iwashita, M. Kobori, K. Yamaki, and T. Tsushida, “Flavonoids inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in B16 melanoma 4A5 cells,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 1813–1820, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
W.-R. Lee, S.-C. Shen, H.-Y. Lin, W.-C. Hou, L.-L. Yang, and Y.-C. Chen, “Wogonin and fisetin induce apoptosis in human promyeloleukemic cells, accompanied by a decrease of reactive oxygen species, and activation of caspase 3 and Ca²⁺-dependent endonuclease,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 225–236, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. König, G. K. Schwartz, R. M. Mohammad, A. Al-Katib, and J. L. Gabrilove, “The novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol downregulates Bcl-2 and induces growth arrest and apoptosis in chronic B-cell leukemia lines,” Blood, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 4307–4312, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Yang, H. S. Oz, S. Barve, W. J. S. de Villiers, C. J. McClain, and G. W. Varilek, “The green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate blocks nuclear factor-κB activation by inhibiting IκB kinase activity in the intestinal epithelial cell line IEC-6,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 528–533, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Tyson, A. Csikasz-Nagy, and B. Novak, “The dynamics of cell cycle regulation,” Bioessays, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1095–1109, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Schwartz and M. A. Shah, “Targeting the cell cycle: a new approach to cancer therapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 36, pp. 9408–9421, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nurse, “A long twentieth century of the cell cycle and beyond,” Cell, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Carnero, “Targeting the cell cycle for cancer therapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Beier, A. Bürgin, A. Kiermaier et al., “Induction of cyclin E-cdk2 kinase activity, E2F-dependent transcription and cell growth by Myc are genetically separable events,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 5813–5823, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Johnston, M. Polymenis, S. Wang, J. Branda, and E. V. Schmidt, “Novel regulatory factors interacting with the promoter of the gene encoding the mRNA cap binding protein (eIF4E) and their function in growth regulation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 5621–5633, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Hengst, U. Göpfert, H. A. Lashuel, and S. I. Reed, “Complete inhibition of Cdk/cyclin by one molecule of p21(Cip1),” Genes and Development, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 3882–3888, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Meeran and S. K. Katiyar, “Cell cycle control as a basis for cancer chemoprevention through dietary agents,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2191–2202, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Abubakar, W. Z. Abdullah, S. A. Sulaiman, and A. B. Suen, “A review of molecular mechanisms of the anti-leukemic effects of phenolic compounds in honey,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 15054–15073, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Suh, L. Luyengi, H. H. S. Fong, A. D. Kinghorn, and J. M. Pezzuto, “Discovery of natural product chemopreventive agents utilizing HL-60 cell differentiation as a model,” Anticancer Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
G. I. Shapiro, “Preclinical and clinical development of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 12, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pouget, F. Lauthier, A. Simon et al., “Flavonoids: structural requirements for antiproliferative activity on breast cancer cells,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 3095–3097, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hirano, M. Gotoh, and K. Oka, “Natural flavonoids and lignans are potent cytostatic agents against human leukemic cells HL-60,” Life Sciences, vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 1061–1069, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kawaii, Y. Tomono, E. Katase, K. Ogawa, and M. Yano, “Antiproliferative activity of flavonoids on several cancer cell lines,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 896–899, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Ferry, A. Smith, J. Malkhandi et al., “Phase I clinical trial of the flavonoid quercetin: pharmacokinetics and evidence for in vivo tyrosine kinase inhibition,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 659–668, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. K. Lin, Y. C. Chen, Y. T. Huang, and S. Y. Lin-Shiau, “Suppression of protein kinase C and nuclear oncogene expression as possible molecular mechanisms of cancer chemoprevention by apigenin and curcumin,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 67, no. s28-29, pp. 39–48, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Sato, L. Koike, Y. Miyata et al., “Inhibition of activator protein-1 binding activity and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway by nobiletin, a polymethoxy flavonoid, results in augmentation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 production and suppression of production of matrix metalloproteinases-1 and -9 in human fibrosarcoma HT-1080 cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1025–1029, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Sies, “Biochemistry of oxidative stress,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1058–1071, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Sharom, “ABC multidrug transporters: structure, function and role in chemoresistance,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 105–127, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ren, Z. Qiao, H. Wang, L. Zhu, and L. Zhang, “Flavonoids: promising anticancer agents,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 519–534, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mishima, Y. Inoh, Y. Narita et al., “Identification of caffeoylquinic acid derivatives from Brazilian propolis as constituents involved in induction of granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 5814–5818, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Beere and J. A. Hickman, “Differentiation: a suitable strategy for cancer chemotherapy?” Anti-Cancer Drug Design, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 299–322, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. B. Pierce and W. C. Speers, “Tumors as caricatures of the process of tissue renewal: prospects for therapy by directing differentiation,” Cancer Research, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1996–2004, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Takahashi, M. Kobori, H. Shinmoto, and T. Tsushida, “Structure-activity relationships of flavonoids and the induction of granulocyticor monocytic-differentiation in HL60 human myeloid leukemia cells,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2199–2204, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Constantinou, K. Kiguchi, and E. Huberman, “Induction of differentiation and DNA strand breakage in human HL-60 and K-562 leukemia cells by genistein,” Cancer Research, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2618–2624, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
A.-N. T. Kong, R. Yu, V. Hebbar et al., “Signal transduction events elicited by cancer prevention compounds,” Mutation Research, vol. 480-481, pp. 231–241, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. K. Kundu and Y.-J. Surh, “Molecular basis of chemoprevention by resveratrol: NF-κB and AP-1 as potential targets,” Mutation Research, vol. 555, no. 1-2, pp. 65–80, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Homma, C. B. Henning-Chubb, and E. Huberman, “Translocation of protein kinase C in human leukemia cells susceptible or resistant to differentiation induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 19, pp. 7316–7319, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
R. C. Stong, S. J. Korsmeyer, and J. L. Parkin, “Human acute leukemia cell line with the t(4;11) chromosomal rearrangement exhibits B lineage and monocytic characteristics,” Blood, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
G. E. Foley, H. Lazarus, S. Farber, B. G. Uzman, B. A. Boone, and R. E. McCarthy, “Continuous culture of human lymphoblasts from peripheral blood of a child with acute leukemia,” Cancer, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 522–529, 1965.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Lanotte, V. Martin-Thouvenin, S. Najman, P. Balerini, F. Valensi, and R. Berger, “NB4, a maturation inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3),” Blood, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1080–1086, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
S. I. Kohno, J. Minowada, and A. A. Sandberg, “Chromosome evolution of near-haploid clones in an established human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line (NALM-16),” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 485–493, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Naumovski, R. Morgan, F. Hecht, M. P. Link, B. E. Glader, and S. D. Smith, “Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines without classical breakpoint cluster region rearrangement,” Cancer Research, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2876–2879, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Rosenfeld, A. Goutner, and C. Choquet, “Phenotypic characterisation of a unique non T, non B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cell line,” Nature, vol. 267, no. 5614, pp. 841–843, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
O. O. Erejuwa, S. A. Sulaiman, M. S. ab Wahab, S. K. N. Salam, M. S. md Salleh, and S. Gurtu, “Comparison of antioxidant effects of honey, glibenclamide, metformin, and their combinations in the kidneys of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 829–843, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. O. Erejuwa, S. A. Sulaiman, M. S. A. Wahab, K. N. S. Sirajudeen, M. S. M. Salleh, and S. Gurtu, “Differential responses to blood pressure and oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic wistar-kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of antioxidant (Honey) treatment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1888–1907, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mandal and S. K. Jaganathan, “Antiproliferative effects of honey and of its polyphenols: a review,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2009, Article ID 830616, 13 pages, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Le Marchand, “Cancer preventive effects of flavonoids—a review,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 296–301, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Middleton Jr., C. Kandaswami, and T. C. Theoharides, “The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease, and cancer,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 673–751, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
O. O. Erejuwa, S. A. Sulaiman, M. S. Wahab, K. N. S. Sirajudeen, M. S. M. D. Salleh, and S. Gurtu, “Antioxidant protection of Malaysian tualang honey in pancreas of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Annales d'Endocrinologie, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 291–296, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Bestwick and L. Milne, “Influence of galangin on HL-60 cell proliferation and survival,” Cancer Letters, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-C. Cheng, T.-C. Huang, C.-S. Lai, and M.-H. Pan, “Induction of apoptosis by luteolin through cleavage of Bcl-2 family in human leukemia HL-60 cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 509, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Csokay, N. Prajda, G. Weber, and E. Olah, “Molecular mechanisms in the antiproliferative action of quercetin,” Life Sciences, vol. 60, no. 24, pp. 2157–2163, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ding, G. Polier, R. Köhler, M. Giaisi, P. H. Krammer, and M. Li-Weber, “Wogonin and related natural flavones overcome tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) protein resistance of tumors by down-regulation of c-FLIP protein and up-regulation of TRAIL receptor 2 expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 641–649, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Farooqui and A. A. Farooqui, “Molecular mechanism underlying the therapeutic activities of propolis: a critical review,” Current Nutrition and Food Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 186–199, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Goto, M. Yanagimachi, S. Goto et al., “Methylated chrysin reduced cell proliferation, but antagonized cytotoxicity of other anticancer drugs in acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 417–425, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. G. Ko, T. H. Kang, S. J. Lee, Y. C. Kim, and B. H. Lee, “Effects of luteolin on the inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human myeloid leukaemia cells,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 295–298, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-J. Lee, O. H. Kim, Y. H. Kim et al., “Quercetin arrests G2/M phase and induces caspase-dependent cell death in U937 cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 234–242, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Spagnuolo, M. Russo, S. Bilotto, I. Tedesco, B. Laratta, and G. L. Russo, “Dietary polyphenols in cancer prevention: the example of the flavonoid quercetin in leukemia,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1259, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Watanabe, S.-I. Kanno, A. Tomizawa, S. Yomogida, and M. Ishikawa, “Acacetin induces apoptosis in human T cell leukemia Jurkat cells via activation of a caspase cascade,” Oncology Reports, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 204–209, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Woo, Y.-J. Jeong, J.-W. Park, and T. K. Kwon, “Chrysin-induced apoptosis is mediated through caspase activation and Akt inactivation in U937 leukemia cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 325, no. 4, pp. 1215–1222, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Wudtiwai, B. Sripanidkulchai, P. Kongtawelert, and R. Banjerdpongchai, “Methoxyflavone derivatives modulate the effect of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human leukemic cell lines,” Journal of Hematology and Oncology, vol. 4, article 52, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aso, S.-I. Kanno, T. Tadano, S. Satoh, and M. Ishikawa, “Inhibitory effect of propolis on the growth of human leukemia U937,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 727–730, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mishima, Y. Narita, S. Chikamatsu et al., “Effects of propolis on cell growth and gene expression in HL-60 cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Motomura, K. M. Kwon, S.-J. Suh et al., “Propolis induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human leukemic U937 cells through Bcl-2/Bax regulation,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gunduz, C. Biray, B. Kosova et al., “Evaluation of Manisa propolis effect on leukemia cell line by telomerase activity,” Leukemia Research, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1343–1346, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Cogulu, C. Biray, C. Gunduz et al., “Effects of Manisa propolis on telomerase activity in leukemia cells obtained from the bone marrow of leukemia patients,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 601–605, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Eom, E. J. Lee, B. S. Yoon, and B. S. Yoo, “Propolis inhibits the proliferation of human leukaemia HL-60 cells by inducing apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway,” Natural Product Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 375–386, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Franchi Jr., C. S. Moraes, V. C. Toreti, A. Daugsch, A. E. Nowill, and Y. K. Park, “Comparison of effects of the ethanolic extracts of brazilian propolis on human leukemic cells as assessed with the MTT assay,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 918956, 6 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, Q. Luo, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2157–2184, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Alencar, T. L. C. Oldoni, M. L. Castro et al., “Chemical composition and biological activity of a new type of Brazilian propolis: red propolis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 278–283, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Daugsch, C. S. Moraes, P. Fort, and Y. K. Park, “Brazilian red propolis—chemical composition and botanical origin,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 435–441, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. Silva, P. L. Rosalen, J. A. Cury et al., “Chemical composition and botanical origin of red propolis, a new type of Brazilian propolis,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 313–316, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. S. Bankova, S. L. de Castro, and M. C. Marcucci, “Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin,” Apidologie, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Marcucci, “Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity,” Apidologie, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 83–99, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Akao, H. Maruyama, K. Matsumoto et al., “Cell growth inhibitory effect of cinnamic acid derivatives from propolis on human tumor cell lines,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1057–1059, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Volpi and G. Bergonzini, “Analysis of flavonoids from propolis by on-line HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 354–361, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Traganos, B. Ardelt, N. Halko, S. Bruno, and Z. Darzynkiewicz, “Effects of genistein on the growth and cell cycle progression of normal human lymphocytes and human leukemic MOLT-4 and HL-60 cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 52, no. 22, pp. 6200–6208, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Spinozzi, M. C. Pagliacci, G. Migliorati et al., “The natural tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein produces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in Jurkat T-leukemia cells,” Leukemia Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 431–439, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, L. T. Frame, K. A. Hoo, Y. Li, N. D'Cunha, and E. Cobos, “Genistein inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma cells in vitro,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2380–2390, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Szliszka, A. Z. Kucharska, A. Sokół-Łętowska, A. Mertas, Z. P. Czuba, and W. Król, “Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory effect of ethanolic extract of Brazilian green propolis on activated J774A. 1 macrophages,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 976415, 13 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kimoto, M. Aga, K. Hino et al., “Apoptosis of human leukemia cells induced by Artepillin C, an active ingredient of Brazilian propolis,” Anticancer Research A, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 221–228, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Murtala B. Abubakar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3482

Downloads

1699

Citations