Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 120981, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/120981
Research Article

Fucoidans Disrupt Adherence of Helicobacter pylori to AGS Cells In Vitro

The Marshall Centre for Infectious Diseases Research and Training, School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M502), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia

Received 13 August 2015; Revised 11 October 2015; Accepted 12 October 2015

Academic Editor: Svein Haavik

Copyright © 2015 Eng-Guan Chua et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Fucoidans are complex sulphated polysaccharides derived from abundant and edible marine algae. Helicobacter pylori is a stomach pathogen that persists in the hostile milieu of the human stomach unless treated with antibiotics. This study aims to provide preliminary data to determine, in vitro, if fucoidans can inhibit the growth of H. pylori and its ability to adhere to gastric epithelial cells (AGS). We analysed the activity of three different fucoidan preparations (Fucus A, Fucus B, and Undaria extracts). Bacterial growth was not arrested or inhibited by the fucoidan preparations supplemented into culture media. All fucoidans, when supplemented into tissue culture media at 1000 µg mL−1, were toxic to AGS cells and reduced the viable cell count significantly. Fucoidan preparations at 100 µg mL−1 were shown to significantly reduce the number of adherent H. pylori. These in vitro findings provide the basis for further studies on the clinical use of sulphated polysaccharides as complementary therapeutic agents.

1. Introduction

Fucoidan, derived from marine edible brown algae, is a complex sulphated polysaccharide [1]. The structures and compositions of fucoidan vary across different brown algae species, but they consist primarily of L-fucose and sulphate, which form polymers with small quantities of D-galactose, D-mannose, D-xylose, and uronic acid [1, 2]. Studies on fucoidans’ propensity to alter biological processes associated with disease have included analysing their ability to inhibit tumour growth, modulate the immune system, interfere with viral mechanisms, and inhibit coagulation and their use as a reducing agent or antioxidant [210].

Many algae-derived concoctions used in traditional medicine have been recorded in pharmacopoeias as agents used to treat bacterial infection, either by inhibiting growth or by colonisation. Indeed, the antibiotic nature of fucoidan has been scientifically investigated in vitro for its ability to inhibit the growth of bacteria that are commonly known to develop multidrug resistance such as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [1113]. Various sulphated polysaccharides including heparin, heparin oligosaccharides, and fucoidan were also reported to competitively inhibit the colonisation of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) [14, 15]. Furthermore, the adherence of Helicobacter species to macrophages was inhibited by fucoidan [16].

H. pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium that colonises the stomach of half of the world’s human population. It causes chronic active gastritis which can progress to peptic ulcers, gastric cancer, and gastric MALT lymphoma [17]. The host’s immune system is unable to clear the infection and it persists unless treated. Current standard H. pylori infection therapy consists of administration of a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole [18]. It was, however, recently shown that the efficacy of this empiric triple therapy has declined to an unacceptably low level of 70% compared to at least 90% eradication rate as a general rule for therapeutic regime prescription against infectious diseases [19]. This problem is in fact due to the increased prevalence of clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori isolates worldwide and it is expected that such occurrence would continue to surge with the use of eradication therapy [2022]. Treatment regimens with higher success rates can involve using expensive and often restricted antibiotics [23]. Alternative and complementary strategies may improve the success rate of current treatment regimens by providing an alternative mechanism to reduce the bacterial burden.

In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial activity of three fucoidan extracts, two of which were isolated from Fucus vesiculosus and one from Undaria pinnatifida, against H. pylori and how these fucoidans can alter adherence of H. pylori to human gastric epithelial cells in vitro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Culture Conditions

Helicobacter pylori strain NCTC 11637 was routinely cultured on Columbia agar supplemented with 7% (v/v) defibrinated horse blood (PathWest) at 37°C in a 10% CO2 environment.

2.2. Mammalian Cell Culture

Human gastric adenocarcinoma epithelial cells (AGS) (Sigma) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 20 mM L-glutamine and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Serana, Fisher Biotech).

2.3. Biochemical Composition Analysis

Three different fucoidans used in this study were kindly provided to us by Marinova Pty. Ltd. (Australia), two of which were derived from Fucus vesiculosus and one from Undaria pinnatifida.

Total carbohydrate content was determined by spectrophotometric analysis of the hydrolysed compound in the presence of phenol, based on a method described by Dubois et al. [24].

Sulfate content was analysed spectrophotometrically using a BaSO4 precipitation method (BaCl2 in gelatin), based on the work of Dodgson [25, 26]. In brief, samples were heated in 1 M hydrochloric acid solution at 105–110°C for 3 hours to adequately cleave all sulfate groups from the molecule. These were then precipitated using a BaCl2/gelatin mixture, and concentration was determined by UV-Vis.

Analysis of polyphenol content was also determined spectrophotometrically, using a method based on the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (phosphomolybdate/phosphotungstate) [2729].

The monosaccharide composition was determined using a GC-based method for the accurate determination of individual monosaccharide ratios in a sample. This method relies on the preparation of acetylated alditol derivatives of the hydrolysed samples [30].

Molecular weight profiles were determined by Gel Permeation Chromatography, with the aid of a Size-Exclusion Column, and were reported relative to Dextran standards.

2.4. Bacterial Growth Inhibition Assay

H. pylori NCTC 11637 bacteria were inoculated (OD600 = 0.05) in duplicate, into 5 mL of Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHIB) (Oxoid) containing 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS, H. pylori selective supplement (DENT) (Oxoid), and individual fucoidan in final concentrations of 1, 10, 100, and 1000 μg mL−1. These cultures were prepared in T25 cell culture flasks (Nunc) and incubated in microaerophilic condition with moderate agitation at 37°C. Aliquots were taken over time and the OD600 readings were measured.

2.5. Cell Toxicity Assay and Viable Cell Count

Cells were seeded at 5 × 104 cells per well in a 24-well tissue culture plate (Corning CellBIND Surface) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere until confluent monolayers formed. Three different fucoidans, each prepared in RPMI medium at the concentrations 1, 10, 100, and 1000 μg mL−1, were added to the cell monolayers in triplicate to test for cell cytotoxicity. Cells were incubated for 3 hours and the cell viability was determined by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release using the CytoTox 96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay (Promega) and by using the trypan blue (Sigma) exclusion method, a stain that selectively colours viable cells.

2.6. Helicobacter pylori Adherence Assay

AGS cells were grown to confluence in 24-well plates. H. pylori cells (grown 24 hours on blood agar plates at 10% CO2 and 37°C) were harvested and resuspended in RPMI medium to form the inoculum. The monolayers were inoculated with bacterial suspension at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 : 1. 3 hours after incubation; the cells were washed and incubated with fucoidans of 100 μg mL−1, in triplicate, for 3 hours under the same conditions. Cells were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco, Invitrogen) and lysed with 1% (w/v) saponin (Sigma) in PBS for 15 minutes. Dilutions of cell lysates were plated on blood agar plates and incubated at 37°C in a 10% CO2 environment for 2-3 days. Visible bacterial colonies were counted. The experiment was repeated twice on different occasions. Results were presented as the mean of three assays with standard deviation.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Student’s -test (Microsoft Excel software). values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biochemical Content Analysis

Fucoidan, derived primarily from marine brown algae, is a complex sulphated polysaccharide and it has been extensively studied over the past three decades for its wide range of potentially beneficial biological properties. Depending on the source of algae, there is considerable diversity in the basic composition and structure of fucoidans and such structural composition variation confers different or unique biological functions to these diverse sulphated compounds [31].

Three fucoidan extracts, two of which were fucoidan fractions isolated from Fucus vesiculosus and one from Undaria pinnatifida, were examined for their total contents including carbohydrate, sulfate, and polyphenol. These data were supplied to us by Marinova and the relative percentages are described in Table 1. Biochemical composition analysis demonstrated that both Fucus A and Fucus B are highly sulfated fucose polymers. Fucus A contained mainly fucose (59.4%) and sulphate (25.3%) and much smaller amounts of galactose and polyphenol (3.3% and approximately 3-4%, resp.). Fucus B, however, contained nearly 50% less fucose level (31%) and around 8-fold greater polyphenolic antioxidant compositions than in Fucus A. The Undaria fucoidan was shown to be composed of mainly fucose, galactose, and sulphate with 42.4%, 22.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, as well as a small amount of polyphenol (2.5%).

Table 1: Biochemical composition of fucoidan preparations. The columns detail the proportions of fucose, galactose, sulphate, and polyphenol that are present in the fucoidan component of the sample.

3.2. Fucoidans Do Not Inhibit the Growth of H. pylori in Culture

Fucoidan derived from Laminaria japonica was reported to be bacteriostatic against several microorganisms including S. aureus. Furthermore, in a study conducted by Lee et al. [32], the combination of antibiotics and fucoidan demonstrated synergistic effect on oral pathogenic bacterial killing. In light of these studies, the potential of Fucus A, Fucus B, and Undaria extracts was investigated in the context of H. pylori eradication.

To determine if fucoidan extracts are bacteriostatic or bactericidal, H. pylori strain NCTC 11637 was cultured in growth medium supplemented with Fucus A, Fucus B, or Undaria extract at different concentrations up to 1000 μg mL−1. The growth of H. pylori did not differ in the presence of fucoidans compared with the control (growth medium only) (Figure 1), indicating that no bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity was observed for any of the fucoidan preparations against H. pylori.

Figure 1: Growth curve analysis of H. pylori NCTC 11637 cultured under varying concentrations (ranging from 1 to 1000 μg mL−1) of different fucoidan extracts. The -axis represents the OD600 reading over time (-axis, hours). (a) H. pylori NCTC 11637 grown in the presence of Fucus A extract. (b) H. pylori NCTC 11637 grown in the presence of Fucus B extract. (c) H. pylori NCTC 11637 grown in the presence of Undaria extract. None of the fucoidan preparations displayed antibacterial growth activity on H. pylori NCTC 11637.
3.3. Fucoidans Are Cytotoxic to AGS Cancer Cells at Higher Concentrations

Since inhibition of bacterial growth was not observed, we then considered whether the fucoidans are capable of inhibiting H. pylori adherence in vitro to a commonly used gastric epithelial cell line, AGS cells. Bacterial attachment to host cells is a key process in bacterial pathogenesis or infection and inhibiting this interaction would reduce bacterial load significantly as H. pylori is incapable of colonising alternative niches in the body. Initially, we investigated the cytotoxicity of fucoidans on AGS cells, as it has been shown in numerous studies that fucoidans inhibit carcinoma cell proliferation [3340]. We, therefore, identified the safe range of fucoidan concentrations used in this assay to ensure maximal cell viability and thus consistency in the number of adherent bacteria recovered after sampling with fucoidans.

To determine if the fucoidan preparations induce cell death, their cytotoxicity of AGS cells was tested by measuring the presence of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the supernatants after exposure (Figure 2(a)) [41]. The levels of LDH were significantly higher for all fucoidan extracts at the concentration of 1000 μg mL−1. Viability counting using trypan blue exclusion approach indicated that 85.5% of cells were viable when Fucus A extract was added to the AGS cells and that 66.5% were viable in the presence of the Undaria preparation (Figure 2(b)). Fewer viable cells were counted for the Fucus B extract (48.4%) than for the Fucus A and Undaria extracts.

Figure 2: Cytotoxicity of fucoidans. (a) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay on AGS cells. Error bars represent standard deviation whilst the symbol indicates statistical significance when compared to the untreated sample ( value < 0.05). (b) Trypan blue viability test. Viable AGS cells after being treated with fucoidan preparations of 1000 μg mL−1 were counted using trypan blue exclusion method. Untreated AGS cells were defined as 100% relative growth.

All 3 fucoidan preparations were found to be toxic to AGS cells when tested at the concentration of 1000 μg mL−1. This is in line with previous studies that fucoidan induces cell death in a dose-dependent manner in several carcinoma cell lines, including AGS cells. Changes in apoptotic regulation are thought to be the mechanism behind this fucoidan-mediated cell death [36, 38, 40, 42]. It is also important to mention that Fucus B extract exerted the greatest cell cytotoxicity towards AGS cells, which is likely due to its high polyphenol content that is at least 8-fold greater compared to Fucus A and Undaria. Polyphenol antioxidant has been extensively reported for its anticancer properties and such activity is thought to be mediated through inhibition of kinase activity [43].

3.4. Fucoidans Disrupt H. pylori Adherence to AGS Cells

We inoculated AGS cells with H. pylori allowing them to bind to the cells and then washed the confluent cells to maintain the H. pylori that were adhered to the AGS cells. Using this aggregate, we supplemented the replacement growth media with each type of fucoidan at 100 μg mL−1, incubated the cells, and subsequently washed the cells to remove nonadherent bacteria. The numbers of colony forming units (CFUs) were counted compared to the control’s CFUs for each experiment to determine if the fucoidan disrupted the adhered bacteria. All fucoidan extracts were shown to significantly remove adherent bacteria from the AGS cell surface when tested at 100 μg mL−1 ( for Fucus A and Undaria and for Fucus B) (Figure 3). This finding indicates that fucoidans bind either to H. pylori or to AGS cells with stronger affinity, thus putatively dislodging the bacteria from host cell surface. It is, however, strongly believed to be the former event as it has been reported that fucoidan extracted from Cladosiphon okamuranus TOKIDA brown algae, which similarly inhibited H. pylori binding to human gastric cell lines MKN28 and KATO III, exerted more potent inhibitory effect by preincubation with bacteria but failed to reduce bacterial adhesion by pretreatment of gastric cells [44]. Furthermore, in the same study, several fucoidan-binding H. pylori outer membrane proteins were detected by immunoblotting analysis. In another study which investigated the effect of Fucus vesiculosus derived fucoidan and sulphated polysaccharides including heparin and Dextran on enterohepatic Helicobacter species to murine macrophage cell line J774A.1, it was shown that only fucoidan achieved substantial reduction of bacterial binding to host cells [16]. The results above provide further support that the anti-H. pylori adhesion activity demonstrated in our study is fucoidan-specific, not due to an unspecific colloidal effect.

Figure 3: Treatment of AGS cells with each fucoidan at 100 μg mL−1 following H. pylori inoculation. The symbols and represent statistical significance of values less than 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, with respect to untreated control.

4. Conclusions

Taken together, the results show that fucoidans inhibit H. pylori attachment to gastric epithelial cells in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Fucus B, a secondary fucoidan fraction with high polyphenol content extracted from Fucus vesiculosus, is the most toxic against AGS carcinoma cells. Hence, if fucoidan, especially Fucus B, can penetrate the protective mucosal surface of the stomach to bind to H. pylori at a low pH, it has potential clinical applications in the treatment of H. pylori infection, as well as potential to prevent gastric cancer development. More importantly, other fucoidan preparations appear to be nontoxic with daily intake up to 6 grams in human clinical studies [45]. Future studies in in vivo infection models are necessary to assess whether the use of these fucoidans in addition to antibiotics would improve H. pylori eradication efficiency.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have declared no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Marinova Pty. Ltd. for providing the fucoidan extracts and for funding part of this work. The NHMRC Grant 572723, Vice Chancellor of University of Western Australia, the Western Australian Department of Commerce and Department of Health, and the University of Malaya supported this work.

References

  1. Y. Gao, C. Li, J. Yin et al., “Fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide from brown algae, improves cognitive impairment induced by infusion of Aβ peptide in rats,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 304–311, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Abdollahi, A. Morteza, O. Khalilzadeh, A. Zandieh, and M. Asgarshirazi, “The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastro-oesophageal reflux in Iranian children,” Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Beress, O. Wassermann, T. Bruhn et al., “A new procedure for the isolation of anti-HIV compounds (polysaccharides and polyphenols) from the marine alga Fucus vesiculosus,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 478–488, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Szabo, S. Kusstatscher, Z. Sandor, and G. Sakoulas, “Molecular and cellular basis of ulcer healing,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 30, no. 208, pp. 3–8, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Juffrie, I. Rosalina, W. Damayanti, A. Djumhana, A. Ariani, and H. Ahmad, “The efficacy of fucoidan on gastric ulcer,” Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 908–913, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Cumashi, N. A. Ushakova, M. E. Preobrazhenskaya et al., “A comparative study of the anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antiangiogenic, and antiadhesive activities of nine different fucoidans from brown seaweeds,” Glycobiology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 541–552, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. O. U. Hayakawa and T. Nagamine, “Effect of fucoidan on the biotinidase kinetics in human hepatocellular carcinoma,” Anticancer Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1211–1218, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Hirai, T. Sasaki, A. Kimoto, S. Fujimoto, T. Moriyama, and Y. Yamamoto, “Assessment of East Asian-type cagA-positive Helicobacter pylori using stool specimens from asymptomatic healthy Japanese individuals,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1149–1153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. H. Fitton, “Therapies from fucoidan; multifunctional marine polymers,” Marine Drugs, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1731–1760, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. H. Pomin, “Fucanomics and galactanomics: marine distribution, medicinal impact, conceptions, and challenges,” Marine Drugs, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 793–811, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. R. Sridhar and N. Vidyavathi, “Antimicrobial activity of seaweeds,” Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 455–496, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Bennamara, A. Abourriche, M. Berrada et al., “Methoxybifurcarenone: an antifungal and antibacterial meroditerpenoid from the brown alga Cystoseira tamariscifolia,” Phytochemistry, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L.-Y. Li, L.-Q. Li, and C.-H. Guo, “Evaluation of in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Laminaria japonica polysaccharides,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 2194–2198, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Hirmo, M. Utt, M. Ringner, and T. Wadström, “Inhibition of heparan sulphate and other glycosaminoglycans binding to Helicobacter pylori by various polysulphated carbohydrates,” FEMS Immunology& Medical Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 301–306, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Ruiz-Bustos, J. L. Ochoa, T. Wadström, and F. Ascencio, “Isolation and characterisation of putative adhesins from Helicobacter pylori with affinity for heparan sulphate proteoglycan,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Lutay, I. Nilsson, T. Wadström, and Å. Ljungh, “Effect of heparin, fucoidan and other polysaccharides on adhesion of enterohepatic helicobacter species to murine macrophages,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. J. Marshall and H. M. Windsor, “The relation of Helicobacter pylori to gastric adenocarcinoma and lymphoma: pathophysiology, epidemiology, screening, clinical presentation, treatment, and prevention,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 313–344, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Malfertheiner, F. Megraud, C. A. O'Morain et al., “Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the maastricht IV/florence consensus report,” Gut, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 646–664, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Rimbara, L. A. Fischbach, and D. Y. Graham, “Optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Mégraud, “H pylori antibiotic resistance: prevalence, importance, and advances in testing,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1374–1384, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Horiki, F. Omata, M. Uemura et al., “Annual change of primary resistance to clarithromycin among helicobacter pylori isolates from 1996 through 2008 in Japan,” Helicobacter, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 86–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Y. Graham and L. Fischbach, “Helicobacter pylori treatment in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1143–1153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Y. Tay, H. M. Windsor, F. Thirriot et al., “Helicobacter pylori eradication in Western Australia using novel quadruple therapy combinations,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 36, no. 11-12, pp. 1076–1083, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Dubois, K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith, “Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 350–356, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. S. Dodgson, “Determination of inorganic sulphate in studies on the enzymic and non-enzymic hydrolysis of carbohydrate and other sulphate esters,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 78, pp. 312–319, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. S. Dodgson and R. G. Price, “A note on the determination of the ester sulphate content of sulphated polysaccharides,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 84, pp. 106–110, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. W. Zoecklein, K. C. Fugelsang, B. H. Gump, and F. S. Nury, Wine Analysis and Production, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Jiménez-Escrig, I. Jiménez-Jiménez, R. Pulido, and F. Saura-Calixto, “Antioxidant activity of fresh and processed edible seaweeds,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 530–534, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Shen, A. Silva, D. A. Dennis, and C. J. Barrow, “A simple 96-well microplate method for estimation of total polyphenol content in seaweeds,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 18, no. 3–5, pp. 445–450, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Morvai-Vitányi, I. Molnár-Perl, D. Knausz, and P. Sass, “Simultaneous GC derivatization and quantification of acids and sugars,” Chromatographia, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 204–206, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. K. Morya, J. Kim, and E.-K. Kim, “Algal fucoidan: structural and size-dependent bioactivities and their perspectives,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K.-Y. Lee, M.-R. Jeong, S.-M. Choi, S.-S. Na, and J.-D. Cha, “Synergistic effect of fucoidan with antibiotics against oral pathogenic bacteria,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 482–492, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Zhuang, H. Itoh, T. Mizuno, and H. Ito, “Antitumor active fucoidan from the brown seaweed, umitoranoo (Sargassum thunbergii),” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 563–567, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Maruyama, H. Tamauchi, M. Hashimoto, and T. Nakano, “Antitumor activity and immune response of Mekabu fucoidan extracted from Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida,” In Vivo, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. V. Alekseyenko, S. Y. Zhanayeva, A. A. Venediktova et al., “Antitumor and antimetastatic activity of fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide isolated from the Okhotsk sea Fucus evanescens brown alga,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 730–732, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Fukahori, H. Yano, J. Akiba et al., “Fucoidan, a major component of brown seaweed, prohibits the growth of human cancer cell lines in vitro,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 537–542, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J.-H. Hyun, S.-C. Kim, J.-I. Kang et al., “Apoptosis inducing activity of fucoidan in HCT-15 colon carcinoma cells,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1760–1764, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. J. Kim, S. Y. Park, J.-Y. Lee, and J. H. Y. Park, “Fucoidan present in brown algae induces apoptosis of human colon cancer cells,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 10, article 96, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. T. Ale, H. Maruyama, H. Tamauchi, J. D. Mikkelsen, and A. S. Meyer, “Fucoidan from Sargassum sp. and Fucus vesiculosus reduces cell viability of lung carcinoma and melanoma cells in vitro and activates natural killer cells in mice in vivo,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 331–336, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H.-J. Boo, J.-H. Hyun, S.-C. Kim et al., “Fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida induces apoptosis in A549 human lung carcinoma cells,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1082–1086, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Korzeniewski and D. M. Callewaert, “An enzyme-release assay for natural cytotoxicity,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 313–320, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. S. Park, G.-Y. Kim, T.-J. Nam, N. Deuk Kim, and Y. Hyun Choi, “Antiproliferative activity of fucoidan was associated with the induction of apoptosis and autophagy in AGS human gastric cancer cells,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 77–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Lamoral-Theys, L. Pottier, F. Dufrasne et al., “Natural polyphenols that display anticancer properties through inhibition of kinase activity,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 812–825, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Shibata, I. Kimura-Takagi, M. Nagaoka et al., “Inhibitory effect of Cladosiphon fucoidan on the adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric cells,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 325–336, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Araya, K. Takahashi, T. Sato et al., “Fucoidan therapy decreases the proviral load in patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type-1-associated neurological disease,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus