Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 270450 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/270450

Detection of Herb-Symptom Associations from Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Data

Academic Editor: Daniela Rigano
Received29 Sep 2014
Revised08 Dec 2014
Accepted11 Dec 2014
Published11 Jan 2015

Abstract

Background. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is an individualized medicine by observing the symptoms and signs (symptoms in brief) of patients. We aim to extract the meaningful herb-symptom relationships from large scale TCM clinical data. Methods. To investigate the correlations between symptoms and herbs held for patients, we use four clinical data sets collected from TCM outpatient clinical settings and calculate the similarities between patient pairs in terms of the herb constituents of their prescriptions and their manifesting symptoms by cosine measure. To address the large-scale multiple testing problems for the detection of herb-symptom associations and the dependence between herbs involving similar efficacies, we propose a network-based correlation analysis (NetCorrA) method to detect the herb-symptom associations. Results. The results show that there are strong positive correlations between symptom similarity and herb similarity, which indicates that herb-symptom correspondence is a clinical principle adhered to by most TCM physicians. Furthermore, the NetCorrA method obtains meaningful herb-symptom associations and performs better than the chi-square correlation method by filtering the false positive associations. Conclusions. Symptoms play significant roles for the prescriptions of herb treatment. The herb-symptom correspondence principle indicates that clinical phenotypic targets (i.e., symptoms) of herbs exist and would be valuable for further investigations.

1. Introduction

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been gradually developed from long-term clinical practices. Comprehensive data analysis about four diagnostic methods and long-term experiences is one of the main knowledge distilling approaches of TCM physicians. As an individualized diagnosis and treatment approach, the correspondence between personalized symptoms of patients and herbs prescribed constitutes basic elements of personalized treatment. The herb-symptom relationship (in which herbs are prescribed for specific symptoms) is a significant component. Furthermore, deriving common and effective herb-symptom relationships from large-scale clinical data of highly experienced TCM physicians can encourage the development of novel clinical prescriptions and the detection of effective empirical TCM clinical therapies [1].

In recent years, data mining methods have been widely applied to TCM clinical data for various clinical knowledge discoveries like syndrome differentiation, herb combination regularity, and patient clustering [2]. It is a significant task in TCM research to establish a data driven TCM clinical medicine research model based on real-world practices [3]. Given that there exist rich empirical and theoretical knowledge underlying TCM data, it is hoped that data mining would help the extraction of reliable and novel knowledge from the collected data.

The complicated relationships between clinical phenotypes and complex intervention used in TCM clinical practices highlight the important network structural patterns hidden in TCM clinical data. In particular, in TCM clinical settings, formula-syndrome correspondence (Fang-Zheng Correspondence [4, 5]) and herb modifications based on personalized symptoms (we call it herb-symptom correspondence [6, 7]) are two well-recognized approaches for TCM individualized treatment. The formula-syndrome correspondence principle is well established in both clinical practices and theoretical research [8]. However, although attempts were made to apply data mining algorithms for the discovery of specific symptom-herb association knowledge from TCM data, such as medical literature and clinical data, there are no studies yet to evaluate the herb-symptom correspondence in large-scale real-world clinical data. Furthermore, due to the similar efficacies held by different herbs, the traditional analytical methods that only treat herb names as distinct variables would fail to detect true herb-symptom association knowledge when a substantial number of efficacy similar herbs are prescribed in clinical data. Therefore, to investigate the correspondence between symptoms and herbs and detect significant and meaningful clinical relationships between symptoms and herbs, we calculate the symptom similarity and herb similarity between each patient pairs and these two similarities are used to evaluate the correlation between symptoms and herbs in clinical data. Furthermore, based on a chi-square correlation, we proposed a network-based correlation analysis (NetCorrA) framework to extract the real positive symptom-herb relationships from large-scale clinical data. The similarities of herb efficacy are also considered in this framework to detect the herb-symptom associations, which otherwise would be neglected by the influence of similar herbs.

During the past two decades, we witnessed many data mining applications and studies to help extract medical knowledge from large-scale clinical data sets [9]. In recent years, a clinical data warehouse platform [10] has been developed to integrate the real-world electronic medical record data to support the medical knowledge discovery and clinical decision-making. For the traditional medicine, data mining method is also utilized widely; Afendi et al. discussed the usage of KNApSAcK Family DB in metabolomics, explain mining techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), partial least square regression (PLSR), and multiway model, and show their application on Indonesian blended herbal medicines (Jamu) as a case study [11]. Many studies have focused on the discovery of the herb combination patterns in clinical prescriptions and the underlying structures of symptoms manifested on clinical patients, which use the data mining methods like latent tree model [12], association rules, and multidimensional reduction method [13]. In traditional medicine, the relationship between herb and formula has been investigated; Afendi et al. explored the relationship between Indonesian herbal plants and the efficacy of jamu [14]. Furthermore, to explore the complicated interactions between symptoms and other related medical entities, Li et al. [15] identified that the relative associated density (RAD) method is effective for TCM clinical data analysis, particularly for analysis of relationships between symptoms in diagnosis and generation of compact and comprehensible symptom feature subsets. Zhuang et al. [6] applied a biclustering method to analyze the compatibility of herbs and herb-symptom modules from clinical data.

However, as an important component for individualized TCM therapies, herb-symptom correlation phenomena still need to be systematically explored. For the detection of herb-symptom correlations, better methods are needed to filter the background noise induced by complicated prior knowledge such as herb efficacy in real-world clinical data.

3. Methods

3.1. Patient Symptom Similarity and Herb Similarity

For a data set, we assume that it has herbs and symptoms. As shown Figure 1, choosing a pair of patients, and , the herb prescription used on patient is defined as and on is ; in the same way, symptom which is set on is defined as and on is . If the herb is contained in the herb prescription of patient , the in the vector is marked as 1; if not, the in the vector is marked as 0. This rule is also applied in the construction of vector . Then, the herb similarity SimiH and symptom similarity SimiS of the patient pairs ( and ) can be defined as: in which represents the norm of vectors . As we know, cosine similarity is a measure of similarity between two vectors of an inner product space that measures the cosine of the angle between them. Cosine similarity gives a useful measure of how similar two documents are likely to be in terms of their subject matter [16]. This means that if the patient pairs have more herbs in common, their SimiH would be closer to 1; likewise, if the patient pairs show more similar symptoms, their SimiS would be closer to 1.

After obtaining these two similarities between each patient pair, we calculate the correlation between symptoms and herbs by investigating the overlapping patterns of these two similarities between each patient pair. To compare the real-world data with random controls, we reshuffled each symptom and herb for patients to construct a random permutation coupled data set (Fisher-Yates shuffle method [17]). The correlation between symptoms and herbs is also calculated in this random controlled data set for comparison.

3.2. Chi-Square Test

We use the chi-square test ( test) method to calculate the relevance of herb-symptom relationship that appears in clinical cases (Table 1). A chi-square statistic is a measure of overall goodness of fit as well as a significance test of individual path coefficients [18]. The formula for chi-square test [19] is in which each of , , , and represents a real number in the fourfold table (Table 1), represents the total number of cases, and represents the chi-square statistics. The larger the value of is, the stronger relevance the herb and the symptom hold.


Greasy fur
(Occurred: 1)
Greasy fur
(Not occurred: 0)

Danshen root (used: 1)933 (a)4192 (b)
Danshen root (not used: 0)2221 (c)13925 (d)

Particularly, when the expected frequency is less than five and the total number of cases is greater than 40, we apply the following adjusted formula: To discover highly significant, relevant, herb-symptom relationship knowledge, we chose those relationships with values less than 0.05 as the reliable results. Furthermore, due to the large number of combinations of symptoms and herbs, the detection of herb-symptom associations is a large-scale multiple comparison problem, which needs to control the false discovery rate of associations. We use Bonferroni correction [20] to counteract this issue.

3.3. Network Extended Correlation Analysis

TCM herb is a complicated therapeutical entity holding various different ingredients and thus possesses different efficacies. This multiple efficacy property of herb leads to common efficacies held by different herbs. Therefore, in TCM clinical settings, physician could prescribe different herbs to treat patients with similar syndromes or symptoms. In this situation, the efficacy correlation between herbs would influence the detection of herb-symptom association patterns by classical correlation analysis methods like chi-square test. To address this issue of efficacy correlation between herbs, we propose a new correlation analysis method by incorporating the herb network with shared efficacies (Figure 2). In this method, when we calculate the correlation between one herb and one symptom, we consider the neighborhood of the herb (besides the herb itself) with significant shared efficacies as the expended herb set. We treated the expended herb set as the surrogate entity of herb to calculate the association between symptoms and herbs (Figure 2). This method is called “network-based correlation analysis method” (NetCorrA) to incorporate the efficacy similar herbs into the correlation analysis between herbs and symptoms. In NetCorrA, we consider the expedition of one herb to its neighborhood with significant overlapped efficacies; say three of the four distinct efficacies. Therefore, we evaluate the distribution of 373 herb efficacies of 829 herbs and calculate the similarity of herb pairs with shared efficacies using cosine measure. From the distribution of efficacies of herbs (Figure 3), we can see that the number of efficacy of herbs concentrates on [3, 6], and the number of herb efficacy similarity concentrates on . However, when we evaluate the similarities between herbs with 3 more shared efficacies, it showed that most (73.58%) of the herb similarities are above 0.5; this means that half of the efficacies are the same in the herbs with no less than 3 common efficacies. Therefore, to be straightforward, we only extend the herb to its neighborhood, in which the herbs have no less than 3 efficacies in common with it.

4. Results

4.1. Clinical Data with Both Symptom Features and the Corresponding Herb Prescriptions

In our experiment, we used four clinical data sets: the patient cases with liver-spleen disharmony, referred to as GPBT; insomnia medical cases, referred to as INSOMNIA; the clinical cases of children with Tourette’s syndrome, referred to as TS; and the inpatient cases with congestive heart failure, referred to as CHF. These data sets include symptoms and the related herb prescriptions as the two main feature sets.

As the data comes from clinical treatment and is highly noisy, the data preprocessing is needed. Firstly, all data is put in an extraction-transformation-loading (ETL) tool which is called medical integrator (MI) for clinical data integration, data cleaning, and preprocessing [10]. Based on this, we further ruled the herb name and symptom name artificially. Finally, clinical staff conducted validation to make sure of the data quality.

The basic information of the four data sets (the number of species of herb/symptom, number of patient, etc.) is depicted in Table 2.


Data setFeature typesNumber of featuresNumber of patient casesAverage number of herbs in the formula/of symptomCommon number of patient cases

GPBTHerb6242134515 21271
Symptom6487230828
INSOMNIAHerb618453714 4533
Symptom1977455811
TSHerb16269911 699
Symptom457009
CHFHerb19414812 148
Symptom2924913

Both the GPBT and INSOMNIA data sets are derived from an established clinical data warehouse [10] that has collected data since 2007. They come from practical formulae issued by several highly experienced TCM physicians and they can reflect the physicians’ clinical experience. The data of TS comes from highly experienced TCM physicians in Dongfang Hospital, the Second Clinical Medical College of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM). Seven hundred initial diagnosis records from 2005 to 2010 were collected in the outpatient treatment of children with TS. The CHF data comes from the Cardiovascularology Division of the First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM, covering November 2011 to March 2013: the data has 253 cases. To filter the background noise in the data, we also reshuffled the original data sets to get their random coupled data set for comparison.

4.2. Herb-Symptom Correspondence Phenomenon

Using ten bins of similarity between patient pairs and by calculating the overlap between patient pairs with both herb similarities and symptom similarities, we have an evaluation of the correlations between herbs and symptoms in the clinical data. Figure 4 depicts the correlations of four data sets, in which the red column shows the result of the real data set while the blue column shows the random data set. We can clearly witness that the correlation between herbs and symptoms presents a strong positive correlation in TCM clinical treatment, especially in data of GPBT and INSOMNIA, which are from the clinical cases of several highly experienced physicians. Moreover, the Pearson coefficient of the correlation of GPBT approximates to 0.960 (the value is ) and INSOMNIA approximates to 0.964 (the value is ). This means that herbs and symptoms show a strong positive correlation in these two data sets. From the basic information of these two data sets (Table 2), we know that the patients in these two clinical case groups have rather diverse clinical manifestations (with thousands of symptom features) and various kinds of herb prescriptions (over 600 distinct herbs prescribed). Thus, in these kinds of typical personalized TCM clinical cases, the herb-symptom correspondence phenomenon (in other words, herb modification according to symptoms) is well established. However, the results of TS and CHF do not show a linear correlation (the Pearson coefficient of the correlation of TS is 0.047 and the value is 0.250; the Pearson coefficient of the correlation of CHF is −0.047 and the value is 0.904) although all the herb similarities between patient cases are much higher than the coupled random cases (0.3 versus less than 0.1 in TS and 0.25 versus less than 0.1 in CHF). This may be partly due to the much lower number of distinct symptoms recorded in these data sets (45 symptoms in TS and 29 symptoms in CHF). To further explore the causes of this difference held between these two conditions, we investigate the similarity distributions of these four data sets (in Figure 5). Figure 5 shows that most of the patient cases in GPBT and INSOMNIA data sets are in low symptom similarity and herb similarity (0.2 is the similarity in most cases), while the other two data sets both have much higher symptom and herb similarities (0.3 is the similarity in most cases for herbs and 0.5 or 0.7 is the similarities for symptom). Furthermore, there are clear disparities between herb similarity distribution and symptom similarity distribution in the latter two data sets. Therefore, we could conclude that the unusual symptom similar patients in the latter two data sets conceal the herb-symptom correspondence principle in the real-world clinical settings. There may exist other factors, such as common syndromes or disease categories that would correspond to the prescribed herb treatment. We further analyzed the core herb combinations prescribed in TS and CHF data sets and found that the clinical treatment of these two disease cases is actually based on two evident core formulae, which consist of rather fixed herbs. This means that there exists formula-disease correspondence other than herb-symptom correspondence in these two typical cases.

4.3. Detection of the Herb-Symptom Association Knowledge

To obtain the significant herb-symptom relationships, we extracted the herb-symptom relationships whose values were less than 0.05 from the chi-square test and NetCorrA method (Table 3). To evaluate the quality of the relationships in terms of clinical coherence, we selected 1000 herb-symptom records of GPBT and INSOMNIA, respectively, and let TCM clinical experts manually label whether there exists correlation or not (correlation: 1; no correlation: 0). The top 50 most-used herbs in the GPBT/INSOMNIA data set are selected. For each selected herb, we chose 20 herb-symptom records which own minimum chi-square values. Table 4 lists the specific herb-symptom relationship results whose clinical label is 1. Clinical label marked 1 means that the herb and the symptom exist in correlation with the clinical treatment. We found that the consistency between correlation analysis and the labels of medical experts had acceptable accuracy. It had 70% of the chi-square test and 72.5% of NetCorrA in GPBT and 71.8% of the chi-square test and 73.2% of NetCorrA in INSOMNIA. In particular, the NetCorrA rectified many false positive herb-symptom correlations, which were detected by the chi-square test as significant correlations but were labeled as no correlations. Table 5 lists specific herb-symptom relationship results whose clinical label is 0. For example, in the GPBT data results, the value of Chinese angelica-red throat association in NetCorrA was 0.557, which showed no significant correlation, while the value was 0 in the chi-square test model, which means that there is a very high correlation. In addition, in INSOMNIA data results, the value of fresh Rehmannia-tongue score’s association in the NetCorrA herb model was 0.221, which is times more than that in the chi-square test. These two associations have the clinical labels of 0, which means that there is no relationship between the herbs and the symptoms. Therefore, the common-effect herb model does filter out the negative symptom-herb relationships. These significant herb-symptom relationships (Table 3), summarized from a large scale of real clinical data, are reliable and are meaningful for TCM clinical diagnosis and treatment.


MODELSITEMSGPBTINSOMNIATSCHF

Chi-square testNumber of related herbs624618189194
Number of herb-symptom results (P values < 0.05)60,24920,95321360
Number of herb-symptom results (q-values < 0.05)44,27111,867230

NetCorrANumber of related herbs3662808589
Number of herb-symptom results (P values < 0.05)38,46312,92317875
Number of herb-symptom results (q-values < 0.05)28,4047,16930

(a) GPBT herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomClinical label (correlation: 1)Chi-square test: P valueChi-square test:
-value
NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
-value

1Chinese angelicaHypogastralgia1000.00040.0032
2Chinese angelicaGreasy fur1000.0002
3Chinese angelicaCough100
4Danshen rootDark tongue1000.00650.0342
5Danshen rootCough100
6Danshen rootAnorexia10000
7Liquorice rootRelaxed pulse100
8Liquorice rootAngina1000.00060.0043
9Baical skullcap rootFever100
10Baical skullcap rootYellow fur100

(b) INSOMNIA herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomClinical label (correlation: 1)Chi-square test: P valueChi-square test:
-value
NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
-value

1Fresh Rehmannia Red tongue10000
2Fresh Rehmannia Distracted1
3Fresh Rehmannia Dried manure 1
4Poria with hostwoodPalpitation10.0003
5Poria with hostwoodYellow fur10.0019
6Poria with hostwoodRed tongue1
7Long GuDizziness100
8Long GuPalpitation1
9Long GuDreaming often1
10Long GuDizziness1

(a) GPBT herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomClinical label
(no correlation: 0)
Chi-square test: P valueChi-square test:
q-value
NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
q-value

1Chinese angelicaWhite tongue coating0000.26850.5993
2Chinese angelicaRed throat0000.55730.9024
3Chinese angelicaThin fur0000.26790.5983
4Danshen rootRed throat0000.92320.9988
5Danshen rootWhite tongue coating0000.16050.4297
6Danshen rootSlippery pulse0000.24590.5689
7Liquorice rootRed throat0000.23460.5531
8Liquorice rootBelch0000.19190.4841
9Baical skullcap rootLittle phlegm0000.86590.9953
10Baical skullcap rootWhite tongue coating0000.38110.7394

(b) INSOMNIA herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomClinical label
(no correlation: 0)
Chi-square test: P valueChi-square test:
q-value
NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
q-value

1Chinese angelicaOliguria00.23520.5299
2Chinese angelicaDeep pulse00.14220.4053
3Chinese angelicaHypodynamia00.41620.6660
4Chinese angelicaPale white tongue00.12030.3657
5Poria with hostwoodRootless fur00.08760.3004
6Poria with hostwoodThin fur00.15480.4259
7Poria with hostwoodAnorexia00.03040.1476
8GinsengExpectoration00.39820.6562
9Long GuNight sweat00.77020.7868
10Long GuLumbago and knee arthralgia00.48690.6999

(c) TS herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomChi-square test: P valueChi-square test: q-value NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
q-value

1Figwort rootFeverishness in palms and soles 0.00770.30010.11210.6405
2Figwort rootHead flick0.02710.61680.27390.8109
3Figwort rootAbnormal tongue fur0.11990.99530.00570.2178
4Figwort root Kengkeng0.14350.99530.11630.6479
5TangshenMalnutrition0.02520.61690.02900.3843

(d) CHF herb-symptom relationship

HerbSymptomChi-square test: P valueChi-square test: q-value NetCorrA:
P value
NetCorrA:
q-value

1TangshenEye mental deficiency0.00180.99460.02910.9954
2TangshenWheezing0.00330.99460.07230.9988
3TangshenMental burnout0.04440.99460.27040.9985
4Cassia twigBurnout0.11270.99460.05490.9825
5Cassia twigShort breath0.00920.99460.00190.8759

5. Discussion

It is well known that syndrome is the main diagnosis of TCM and it is the target of herb precription as well [21, 22]. This principle is also held by most traditional medicines like Kampo diagnosis [23]. This means that the patients that have different syndromes would have much different herb prescriptions as treatment even though they have similar symptoms [24]. Meanwhile, in TCM formula theories, herbs are mainly described by efficacies and herb properties like “hot” and “cold,” which are different from symptom oriented indications [25].

In this paper, we investigate and detect the correlation between symptoms and herbs by calculating the similarities bewteen each patient pairs. Four data sets derived from real-world clinical practices are used to investigate the general symptom-herb correlation phenomena and discover specific regularities between symptoms and herbs. The results indicate that there exists strong correlation between symptoms and herbs in clinical records, particularly, in the outpatient cases treated by highly experienced TCM physicians. Therefore, the result confirms that “symptomatic treatment” is one of the basic principles adhered to by TCM physicians during the prescription of individualized clinical treatment. This “herb-symptom correspondence” principle is acutally hidden in the real-world clinical data. In other words, the actual data suggests that TCM physicians make herb additive or subtractive prescriptions according to the patient’s symptoms in clinical treatment particularly for patients with clinical manifestations. Specifically, from the result of the GPBT syndrome data set, it shows strong positive correlation between herb-similarity and symptom-similarity (Pearson coefficient = 0.96). This could be used to further investigate the clinical phenotype targets of herbs or herb prescriptions that may phenotype screening for novel drug development.

Furthermore, based on the verified herb-symptom corresponding principle, we demonstrate the approach to obtain the significant herb-symptom relationships by chi-square test and NetCorrA methods. The results showed that NetCorrA performs better than chi-square test to detect the true herb-symptom associations; in particular, it filters many false positive associations, which otherwise would be detected by chi-square test. As we know that the underlying mechanisms of clinical manifestations like symptoms are not elucidated yet and the efficacies of herbs are not fully investigated, due to the complicated and various manifestations of patients in clinical settings, the herb prescriptions produced by TCM physicians contain many novel empirical skills that are not covered by existing classical knowledge, which would provide valuable resources for clinical data mining and medical research. Therefore, these results contain some specific knowledge held in the mind of TCM physicians, which would play a significant role in the distilling and refinement of empirical knowledge of TCM physicians. In addition, young TCM physicians could use these specific symptom-herb associations for references while they are conducting regular clinical tasks.

However, because herb prescription is a kind of combination therapy, which often includes 10–20 different herbs as a whole for disease treatment, the reliable detection of herb-symptom associations needs further consideration of the interaction between herbs in prescriptions. Currently, in this paper, NetCorrA has not incorporated herb combinations as factors to detect the herb-symptom associations, which can further be investigated by using the methods like gene set enrichment analysis approach [26]. Another limitation of the current work is that we do not evaluate the herb-symptom associations as effective or not because we have not included the outcome related information like symptom disappearance in the EMR data. This would be investigated in our future work.

Being one kind of the key clinical manifestations of patients, symptoms play significant role for clinical diagnosis and treatment, which evidently have their underlying molecular mechanisms [27]. Therefore, the detection of herb-symptom associations and further of the herb-symptom interaction would be useful for investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms of traditional herb medicines [28], which may be helpful to change traditional medicine from empirical medicine to evidence-based and molecule-oriented medicine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Yu-Bing Li, Xue-Zhong Zhou, Run-Shun Zhang, Ying-Hui Wang, Yonghong Peng, and Bao-Yan Liu conceived and designed the study. Yu-Bing Li performed the data analysis. Yu-Bing Li, Xue-Zhong Zhou, Run-Shun Zhang, Yonghong Peng, Jing-Qing Hu, and Qi Xie drafted the paper. Yan-Xing Xue and Li-Li Xu contributed to the benchmark data curation and interpretation of the data. Xiao-Fang Liu was involved in the clinical data collection. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by NSFC Project (61105055, 81230086, and 81202858), China 973 Project (2014CB542900), National 863 Program of China (2012AA02A609), National S&T Major Project of China (2012ZX09503), Special Research Project of TCMS by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (201407001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. Q. Xie, B. Liu, K. Li et al., “The scientific value of TCM clinical data,” International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 455–456, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. Liu, X. Zhou, Y. Wang et al., “Data processing and analysis in real-world traditional Chinese medicine clinical data: challenges and approaches,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 653–660, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | PubMed | MathSciNet
  3. X. Zhou, Y. Peng, and B. Liu, “Text mining for traditional Chinese medical knowledge discovery: a survey,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 650–660, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z.-G. Wang, H.-L. Hu, K. Lan, and X.-H. Jiang, “Application of PK-PD methods based on metabonomics and “FANG-ZHENG Correspondence” to investigating compatibility of Chinese material medica,” Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. Zhang, J. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Research on “FANG-ZHENG Correspondence”,” China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 8–10, 2005 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. Zhuang, X. Zhou, C. Jia et al., “Analyzing of TCM herb-symptom relationship based on Biclustering,” Computer Engineering, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 241–243, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. Poon, Z. Luo, and R.-S. Zhang, “Feature representation in the biclustering of symptom-herb relationship in Chinese medicine,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 663–668, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Zhu, ““FANG-ZHENG correspondence” is the spirit of TCM,” Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 52–54, 2006 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Wang, X. Gao, B. Zhang et al., “Methodology of discovery of modern Chinese medicine based on network biology,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 228, 2011 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  10. X. Zhou, S. Chen, B. Liu et al., “Development of traditional Chinese medicine clinical data warehouse for medical knowledge discovery and decision support,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 48, no. 2-3, pp. 139–152, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. M. Afendi, N. Ono, Y. Nakamura et al., “Data mining methods for omics and knowledge of crude medicinal plants toward big data biology,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. L. Zhang, S. Yuan, T. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Latent tree models and diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 229–245, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X.-Z. Zhou, R.-S. Zhang, S. Jatin et al., “Patterns of herbal combination for the treatment of insomnia commonly employed by highly experienced Chinese medicine physicians,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 655–662, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. M. Afendi, L. K. Darusman, A. Hirai et al., “System biology approach for elucidating the relationship between indonesian herbal plants and the efficacy of jamu,” in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW '10), pp. 661–668, December 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G.-Z. Li, S. Sun, M. You, Y.-L. Wang, and G.-P. Liu, “Inquiry diagnosis of coronary heart disease in Chinese medicine based on symptom-syndrome interactions,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 7, article 9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. V. Batagelj and U. Brandes, “Efficient generation of large random networks,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 71, no. 3, Article ID 036113, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Singhal, “Modern information retrieval: a brief overview,” Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 35–43, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  18. N. Mantel, “Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58, no. 303, pp. 690–700, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  19. H. O. Lancaster, The Chi-Squared Distribution, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1969. View at: MathSciNet
  20. C. E. Bonferroni, Teoria Statistica delle Classi e Calcolo delle Probabilita, Libreria Internazionale Seeber, 1936.
  21. Diagnostics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Singing Dragon, 2011.
  22. N. L. Zhang, S. Yuan, T. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Statistical validation of traditional Chinese medicine theories,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 583–587, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Motoo, I. Arai, and K. Tsutani, “Use of kampo diagnosis in randomized controlled trials of kampo products in Japan: a systematic review,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e104422, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J.-X. Chen and L.-S. Hu, “Traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of chronic prostatitis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 763–769, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A.-P. Lu, H.-W. Jia, C. Xiao, and Q.-P. Lu, “Theory of traditional chinese medicine and therapeutic method of diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1854–1856, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. Subramanian, P. Tamayo, V. K. Mootha et al., “Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 43, pp. 15545–15550, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. X. Z. Zhou, J. Menche, A. L. Barabási, and A. Sharma, “Human symptoms—disease network,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, Article ID 4212, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. M. Afendi, T. Katsuragi, A. Kato et al., “Systems biology approaches and metabolomics for understanding Japanese traditional Kampo medicine,” Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Yu-Bing Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1596 Views | 565 Downloads | 7 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.