Review Article

Huangqi Jianzhong Tang for Treatment of Chronic Gastritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Table 2

Meta-analysis and pooled results of the main outcome in included studies.

Study IDAdverse reactionRisk of biasFollow-upRandom methodOverall effect
OR (95% CI)
TCM syndrome effectHp OR
(95% CI)
Gastroscope
OR (95% CI)
Pathology OR
(95% CI)
Overall effect value

Chen and Lai 2013 [7]Not mentionedLowNot mentionedNot mentioned3.08 (1.10, 8.62)OR 6.67 (1.41, 31.59)0.03

Fu et al. 2013 [8]Not foundLowNot mentioned Random number table5.21 (1.28, 21.24)MD −5.85 (−7.71, −3.99)0.02

Zhang 2013 [9]Not foundLowNot mentionedRandom number table3.58 (0.89, 14.39)OR 9.75 (1.16, 82.11)6.02 (1.43, 25.40)3.78 (1.29, 11.06)2.83 (1.00, 7.98)0.07

Shi 2010 [10]Not mentionedLowNot mentionedNot mentioned3.86 (1.41, 10.57)0.009

Li and Xu 2009 [11]Not mentionedLowNot mentionedNot mentioned1.64 (0.51, 5.33)0.41

L. Liu and Y. Liu 2014 [12]Not mentionedLowNot mentionedRandom number table2.62 (0.99, 6.94)0.05

Ni et al. 2013 [13]Not found for intervention; rash and anaphylactoid purpura of legs for 1 case in control group; increase of eosinophil for 1 case LowNot mentionedNot mentioned2.80 (1.35, 5.82)0.006

Li 2013 [14]In intervention group, epigastric pain, fullness, belching, and poor appetite were all less than control groupLowNot mentionedNot mentioned3.62 (0.90, 14.63)0.07

Tang and Hong 2003 [15]Most in control group, poor appetite, upper abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting, and so forth; especially used metronidazole, must add metoclopramide and anisodamine, and so forth, impacted quality of livesLowNot mentionedNot mentioned1.58 (0.25, 9.95)0.63