Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3918219 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3918219

Jesús Rafael Rodriguez Amado, Ariadna Lafourcade Prada, Julio Cesar Escalona Arranz, Renato Pérez Rosés, Humberto Morris Quevedo, Hady Keita, Edgar Puente Zapata, Caio Pinho Fernandes, José Carlos Tavares Carvalho, "Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activity of a New Tablets Formulation from Tamarindus indica L.", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 3918219, 7 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3918219

Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activity of a New Tablets Formulation from Tamarindus indica L.

Academic Editor: Pradeep Visen
Received08 Dec 2015
Revised25 Jan 2016
Accepted08 Mar 2016
Published07 Apr 2016


Hepatotoxic chemicals damage liver cells primarily by producing reactive oxygen species. The decoction of the leaves of Tamarindus indica L. is used for liver disorders. In this work we evaluated the hepatoprotective activity of a tablet formulation of this plant. Thirty-five Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups (). First group (I) is control group, fed with standard diet. Groups II to V (hepatotoxic groups) were subjected to a subcutaneous injection of CCl4 (0.5 mL/kg). Group II was negative control, fed with standard diet; group III was subjected to administration of Silymarin 150 mg/kg and groups IV and V were treated with tablets in dose of 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively. Lipid peroxidation and the activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and reduced glutathione were evaluated. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamine transferase, alkaline phosphatase, and a lipid profile were evaluated too. The tablets inhibit lipid peroxidation. The redox balance (SOD-CAT-GSH) remains normal in the experimental groups treated with tablets. The liver function using dose of 200 mg/kg of tablets was better than the other experimental groups. These results justify, scientifically, the ethnobotanical use of the leaves of Tamarindus indica L.

1. Introduction

As it is known, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by cells leads to oxidative stress and macromolecular damage, contributing to the pathogenesis of many diseases. Liver damage is very common because the liver is a key organ in the detoxification process. Hepatotoxic chemicals damage liver cells primarily, by producing ROS, some of which form covalent bonds with the lipid tissue. Due to excessive exposure to hazardous chemicals, sometimes the free radicals generated are so high that they overpower the natural defense system, leading to hepatic damage [1].

The peroxidation of membrane lipids results in the loss of membrane structure and integrity. This results in elevated serum levels of enzymes, especially γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, a membrane bound enzyme in serum [2]. Acute poisoning with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) causes a high lipid accumulation. After that, a necrosis of the tissue is presented. Some chemicals produce a very specific type of damage; others notably ethanol produce sequential types of damage or combination of damages. Hepatitis, a common disorder of varying severity, can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and death. If acute liver disorders are not promptly treated the damage will go to chronic forms characterized by continuing hepatocellular necrosis and inflammation, usually with fibrosis, which tends to progress to cirrhosis and liver failure [3]. In this context, therapeutic alternatives are limited. For this reason, there is a great need to find new drugs for the treatment of these pathologies.

Tamarindus indica L. (TIL) or tamarind as is commonly known belongs to the Fabaceae family, Caesalpiniaceae subfamily; it is a tropical tree, native of Africa and Southern Asia. This plant is widespread in the Amazonia and the Caribbean. The decoction of its leaves constitutes a useful remedy for hepatitis, jaundice, and gallbladder disorders treatment in the Caribbean area and the Amazon [4]. Tamarind leaves contain fatty acids, heavy alcohols, proteins, and essential amino acids and carbohydrates [5]. Important minerals for cell redox balance as zinc, manganese, copper, nickel, and selenium are reported for the leaves of this species, too [6].

Around 20 volatile oils are reported in the leaves of this species [7]. Polyphenols (i.e., ferulic and caffeic acids) and flavonoids (orientin, isoorientin, vitexin, and isovitexin) are reported as mainly responsible for the strong antioxidant activity [8], hepatoprotective activity [9], and antimicrobial [6] of the leaves extracts of this plant. Other metabolites reported for tamarind leaves are triterpenes (lupeol and lupanone), fatty acids (palmitic and oleic acid), and others as tartaric and citric acids and vitamins (A, C, and E) [5].

The majority of the tamarind constituents are antioxidants; for this reason it has been used for centuries as hepatoprotective. In this way, it has been reported as strong antioxidant activity of the polyphenols and flavonoids, mediated by the inhibition of ROS mechanism formation [1, 10]. The antioxidant effects of essential oils are strongly dependent on the content of phenolic [11]. Ferulic acid protects from CCl4 induced acute liver injury through reduction of oxidative damage and inflammatory signaling pathways [12]. Copper, nickel, manganese, and iron are involved in the first line of the endogenous antioxidant cell defense system [3] and selenium in association with vitamin E plays an important role in the protection of the membrane lipid content [13].

The aim of this work was to evaluate the antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of a new tablet formulation obtained from the standardized soft extract of Tamarindus indica L. leaves.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Tamarind leaves were collected (November 2014) from a tamarind population in Santiago de Cuba, Cuba (located 20°2′38.9′′N and 075°45′25.8′′W). A voucher specimen (registered as 052216) was deposited at the herbarium of the Biology Department, University of Oriente, Cuba. Collected leaves were sun-dried (residual humidity below 10% by the stove method), milled (MLK, Russia), and passed across 5 mm of mesh light sieve.

2.2. Tablets Preparation

Tablets of Tamarindus indica L. were obtained and optimized by using the wet granulation method [14]. The standardized soft extract from Tamarindus indica L. leaves was used as active ingredient [15]. Tablets contain excipients like microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, croscarmellose sodium, colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate, all of which are approved by the FDA [16].

2.3. Animals

Thirty-five adult female Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 150–200 g each, were obtained from the National Center for the Production of Laboratory Animals (CENPALAB), Havana City, Cuba. Rats were housed in Makrolon cages (seven per cages) under normal laboratory conditions. They were fed with standard diet CMO-1000 (CENPALAB, Havana) for one week as an adaptation period. Water was provided to rats from an inverted bottle supported on the top of the cage. Food and water were provided ad libitum.

All the experiments were carried out in agreement with the Good Laboratory Practices, taking into account the ethical considerations settled down, in the Guide for the Handling of the Laboratory Animal of the International Council for Laboratory Animals Sciences [17], according to the Ethical Committee of the Toxicology and Biomedicine Center (TOXIMED), Medical University of Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.

2.4. Experimental Groups

Thirty-five rats were randomly divided into five groups (). The first group (I) was normal untreated group, fed with standard diet and distilled water all the time. Hepatotoxic groups (groups II to V) were subjected to subcutaneous injection of CCl4 in a single dose of 0.5 mL/kg, mixed with an equal volume of soya oil, on the 2nd day of experiment [18]. The second group (II) was the negative control, fed with standard diet and distilled water, without any treatment. The third group (III) was treated with Silymarin 150 mg/kg (Cosmos, México) as standard hepatoprotective drug and groups IV and V were treated with TIL tablets at doses 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively. Rats were weighted at 0, 4, and 7 days.

2.5. Food and Water Intake

The intake of water and food was measured daily. Glass transparent flasks of 250 mL were utilized. They were tared, so each division corresponds to 10 mL. The flasks were daily completed with water. They were plugged utilizing an adjustable closing of PVC. This permitted a daily control of the water consumed. A quantity of 175 g of food was supplied initially, and it was placed in topside of the box. Daily, the remnant food was weighed and the initial mass was completed again. The measurements were made until the seventh day of experiment.

2.6. Biochemical Assays
2.6.1. Blood and Tissue Collection

Experiment was concluded at 7 days. Rats were starved for 12 h and then sacrificed under light ether anesthesia. The blood was obtained from all animals by puncturing retroorbital plexus. The blood samples were collected into clean dry centrifuge tubes stored at room temperature for 10 minutes and then at 4°C for one hour and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes to separate serum. Serum was transferred into dry clean tubes and preserved at −20°C until being assayed.

The rat livers were separated and washed in the ice-cold saline solution (1–4°C), dried with filter paper, and weighed immediately. The homogenate (prepared in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.2) was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 5 minutes and supernatant was used for the assay [19].

Antioxidant Activity. The antioxidant activity of the tablets was evaluated on hepatic tissue samples. The lipid peroxidation (LP) was evaluated using the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, as an indirect measure [20]. The Han et al. [21] method was used to determine MDA, based on its reaction with thiobarbituric acid to form a pink complex with maximum absorption at 535 nm. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymatic activity was determined using the Superoxide Dismutase Assay Kit, from Cayman Chemical Company (USA). Catalase activity was determined using the commercial kit CAT-240 (Applied Bioanalytical Labs, USA). Reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration was measured using the Glutathione Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich®, USA).

Hepatoprotective Activity. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamine transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (TB) were determined using commercially available kits (Spinreact, Spain), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein (TP) was evaluated using the Biuret method depicted in commercial kit (HELFA, Diagnostics, Cuba).

Serum total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoproteins cholesterol (HDL-c) were determined using the methods described by of Allain et al. [22], respectively. The determination of low-density lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-c) and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL-c) was performed according to the methods described by Lee and Nieman [23].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statgraphics plus (version 5.0.1 for Windows, MA, USA) was used to carry out the statistical analysis. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test were carried out to compare the groups that were statistically different. Values of were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Corporal Weight and Intake of Water and Food

Figure 1 shows the daily intake of food and water of all experimental groups, while Table 1 does it for the corporal weight and liver weight behavior. The intake of water was the same for groups from I to IV, but statistically higher than those measured for group V (; ). On the other hand, the food intake was statistically the same for all groups (; ). Relating these results to the corporal weight gain (Table 1) it is a fact that, independently of treatment group, the animals do not modify their habits of nutrition and hydration. This has a direct impact on their corporal weight increment with the exception of group II, in which significant statistical differences were found. In general, there is an inverse relationship between corporal weight increments and liver weight as should happen in hepatic disorders [24]. According to the anatomical variable (liver weight/corporal weight relationship), the three treated groups (III, IV, and V) showed a preserved hepatic function, in a clear opposition to the liver damage induced by the carbon tetrachloride injection.

GroupInitial body weight (g)Final body weight (g)Body weight gain (g)Liver weight
Liver weight/final body weight (%)

I176.39 (12.23)212.23 (13.42) 35.84 (3.25)3.49 (0.80)1.64 (0.22)
II189.24 (13.88)194.70 (17.40)5.46 (1.99)4.85 (0.86)2.49 (0.51)
III175.29 (12.26)214.87 (25.21)39.58 (4.52)3.41 (0.75)1.59 (0.29)
IV181.36 (12.54)223.47 (13.15)42.11 (4.12)3.86 (0.65)1.72 (0.35)
V191.86 (13.47)229.93 (16.69)38.07 (3.57)3.75 (0.92)1.63 (0.26)

I: control group; II: CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity group; III: Silymarin treated group; IV and V: Tamarindus indica L. tablets treated groups at doses 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively.
Different letters on columns indicate significant statistical differences ().
3.2. Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activity

Table 2 shows the different antioxidant variables having into account all the five experimental groups. In all cases, the treatment with Silymarin or Tamarindus indica L. tablets activated the antioxidant defense system in a similar way and at normal levels (compared to group I), with the only exception of MDA. Data do not reveal clear differences between the two doses of tamarind tablets used. Table 3 shows the behavior of the hepatic function of the rats in the experimental groups. Increments in the activity of enzymes ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT in the tetrachloride group were observed. The values of the activity of these enzymes were bigger and statistically different from the control group (). The ALT activity observed for groups III, IV, and V decreased their levels at the same rank as the control group (I) without statistical differences between them. For the other enzymes (AST, ALP, and GGT) the activity level decreased regarding group II but did not reach the normal values of group I. In general, the group treated with 200 mg/kg of tamarind tablets exhibit the better results, in some cases better than Silymarin group.

(nmol/g tissue)(UI/mg tissue)(UI/mg tissue)(mg/g tissue)

I0.47 ± 0.040.35 ± 0.020.40 ± 0.0229.74 ± 1.98
II1.49 ± 0.180.15 ± 0.010.13 ± 0.0215.84 ± 1.30
III0.66 ± 0.030.31 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.0232.58 ± 2.68
IV0.60 ± 0.040.28 ± 0.030.43 ± 0.0233.01 ± 2.26
V0.64 ± 0.030.33 ± 0.020.37 ± 0.0329.93 ± 0.90

MDA: malondialdehyde; SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; GSH: reduced glutathione.
I: control group; II: CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity group; III: Silymarin treated group; IV and V: Tamarindus indica L. tablets treated groups at doses 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD ().
Different letters on columns indicate significant statistical differences ().

GroupALT (UI/L)AST (UI/L)ALP (UI/L)GGT (UI/L)TB (mg/100 mL)TP (g/100 mL)

I32.56 2.0521.37 0.59187.32 3.0886.18 3.863.09 0.047.12 0.47
II326.78 19.3195.97 4.41426.53 3.31161.30 7.906.57 0.095.26 0.37
III36.33 0.9437.27 5.64204.56 2.9098.10 1.404.84 0.258.29 0.22
IV38.62 0.9838.67 2.50246.76 3.10111.10 1.195.21 0.177.41 0.23
V33.49 0.9125.38 2.38202.51 4.9699.09 3.345.15 0.068.33 0.34

ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, GGT: -glutamyl transpeptidase, TB: total bilirubin, and TP: total protein.
I: control group; II: CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity group; III: Silymarin treated group; IV and V: Tamarindus indica L. tablets treated groups at doses 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively.
Different letters on columns indicate significant statistical differences in Tukey HSD test.
Data are expressed as mean SD; .

Table 4 shows effect of Tamarindus indica L. tablets on serum lipid profile of Sprague Dawley rats. Treatment with CCl4 produced significant elevations in serum triglyceride concentrations (). However, the group treated with Tamarindus indica L. tablets at both doses (100 and 200 mg/kg) had the lowest triglyceride levels. Cholesterol levels had a similar pattern to that of the triglycerides. Notably, the CCl4 treatment increased the LDL-c concentration (group II). The treatment with Tamarindus indica L. tablets significantly reduced the LDL-c levels, particularly at the dose of 200 mg/kg (). Supplementation with Tamarindus indica L. tablets led to decreasing in LDL-c levels higher than the Silymarin treated group. As expected, the highest concentrations of VLDL-c were found in CCL4 treated animals. The administration of Tamarindus indica L. tablets especially at 200 mg/kg led to statistically significant decrease of VLDL-c values () compared to group II (CCl4), but its effectiveness was lower than in the Silymarin group.


I48.41 2.26 94.91 3.1649.59 1.8335.64 1.759.68 0.95
II120.57 6.90 151.00 3.4325.98 2.06100.91 5.4324.11 1.32
III56.88 2.94 96.56 2.7851.24 1.1633.94 2.0211.38 1.59
IV52.32 3.3992.58 2.9946.41 1.4035.71 0.9810.46 0.98
V50.83 2.0490.59 2.7148.29 1.3332.13 1.9510.17 0.91

TG: triglycerides, CHOL: cholesterol, HDL: high-density lipoproteins, LDL: low-density lipoproteins, and VLDL: very low-density lipoproteins (-c, bounded to cholesterol).
I: normal group; II: CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity group; III: Silymarin treated group; IV and V: Tamarindus indica L. tablets treated groups at doses 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively.
Different letters on columns indicate significant statistical differences in Tukey HSD test.
Data are expressed as mean SD; .

4. Discussion

The weight gain observed in groups III, IV, and V indicates that despite the presence of the CCl4, the treatment with tamarind tablets was able to maintain the organic functionality of the biomodels. The Silymarin and tablets administered at both doses protect the biosynthetic function of animals. In contrast, in animals in Group II even when their food and water intake was similar to the rest of the experimental groups, their body weight decreased after the fourth day. This suggests that there was a decrease in biosynthetic function caused by the toxic action of CCl4.

The hepatotoxic effects of the CCl4 are associated with trichloromethyl free radical [25]. Thus, the free radicals bind covalently to the macromolecules inducing peroxidative degradation of membrane lipids in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. This leads to the formation of lipid peroxides and the degradation of membranes. The latest is the principal causes of hepatotoxicity of CCl4 [26].

The polyphenol and flavonoids content in TIL extracts are responsible for the antioxidant [8] and hepatoprotective [9] activity of this drug. On the other hand, the elemental contents, mainly copper, nickel, manganese, and iron, are cofactors of the four isoenzymes of the SOD. These enzymes in joint action with glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase play an important role as part of the antioxidant defense system [24]. The last one is selenium-dependent. Selenium plays an important role as antioxidant [27]. This microelement combined with vitamin E plays important role in the protection of the membrane lipid content [13].

Lipid peroxidation plays an important role in decompensated liver function [28, 29]. Propagation reactions associated with lipid peroxidation produce MDA, the indicator most commonly used to assess lipid peroxidation [2, 30]. In this research, a high concentration of MDA in CCl4 treated group was observed. Tamarind tablets in both dose levels significantly decreased the production of MDA in the liver of experimental animals. This is an evidence of an inhibitory activity of lipid peroxidation, similar to that produced by Silymarin 150 mg/kg. The literature reports that several groups of metabolites present in the phytocomplex of the tamarind soft extract contribute to antioxidant activity by different ways. Thus, antioxidants act together in their effects [31]. This is the case of exogenous nonenzymatic antioxidants such as vitamins C and E for keeping the integrity of the hepatocyte membrane [32] and the endogenous enzymatic system (superoxide dismutase-catalase-glutathione) inside the hepatocytes [2, 33].

The results suggest that not only polyphenols and flavonoids are responsible for the observed antioxidant effect. In this way, the presence of the elements like zinc, copper, manganese, iron, and selenium; tartaric, citric, malic [34], palmitic, and oleic acid [35, 36]; and vitamins of the B complex and triterpenes as lupanone and lupeol [37] is important, all of which have an important antioxidant activity. Probably, a synergy may occur with the activity of other constituents present in the soft extract, fact that is reported in literature [31]. Synergy would be a plausible explanation for the good antioxidant activity observed in this work.

In plant extracts, both the antioxidant effect and the hepatoprotective activity cannot be attributed to a particular substance. Numerous reports suggest that the “synergy’’ of all metabolites present in the active principle has a powerful antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity. This action is produced throughout various mechanisms [38, 39]. In this regard, the potential of Tamarindus indica L. tablets is very high. The synergy was reported in the hepatoprotective activity of some substances present in natural extracts, among them, vitamin C and α-tocopherol [40, 41]; linalool and polyphenols [11]; γ-terpinene and p-cymene [42]; and α-tocopherol and β-sitosterol [40]. Other synergistic effects are reported too for ferulic acid and caffeic acid with their phenyl esters [43] and selenium with vitamin E [13]. All of these metabolites are present in the soft extract used as active principle in tamarind tablets.

Carbon tetrachloride increased dramatically the serum triglyceride concentrations. The pathogenesis of fatty liver in CCl4 intoxication is the result of an imbalance between hepatic fatty acid flow and triglycerides synthesis and excretion. One of the earliest manifestations of CCl4 induced liver damage is the accumulation of fat. Characteristic gene expression profiles may be associated with the disruption of lipid metabolism induced by CCl4 treatment [37].

Treatment with Tamarindus indica L. tablets at both doses led to a significant reduction of triglyceride and cholesterol levels in rats. These results, at least partially, could reflect the VLDL-c pattern found in our study, lower than the animals treated with CCl4 and similar to the group treated with Silymarin. The VLDL-c is involved in the transport of endogenous triglycerides from liver to peripheral tissues and is the precursor of LDL-c, through the intermediate density lipoproteins [24]. The LDL-c transports cholesterol to diverse tissues and in conditions in which their level increased above normal they represent a risk for atherosclerosis development. In our work, the LDL-c was restored to values of the control group. Another interesting fact is the increasing of HDL-c in the animals treated with Tamarindus indica L. tablets with respect to animals treated with CCl4 alone. HDL-c plays a crucial role in the cholesterol reverse transport from peripheral tissues to liver for its excretion [24]. In general, these findings suggest an improvement in the lipid profile as the result of the activity of tamarind tablets administration to CCl4 intoxicated rats. Chan et al. [44] reported the beneficial effects in the lipid profile of Sprague Dawley rats with hepatic fibrosis induced with CCl4 treated with yam. Its administration decreased serum triglyceride and LDL-c levels although no effects were found in serum cholesterol concentration.

5. Conclusion

The tamarind tablets inhibit lipid peroxidation in Sprague Dawley rats intoxicated with CCl4. The redox balance (SOD-CAT-GSH) was normal in the experimental groups treated with tablets in both dosage levels. There are no statistical significant differences among the results observed for Silymarin 150 mg/kg and the tamarind tablets at both dose levels. The Tamarind tablets keep the liver functions in the presence of the CCl4 at levels that were not statistically different from the values observed in the control group. The dose 200 mg/kg of tablets was the best, because it kept liver function in the experimental animals. These results justify, scientifically, the ethnobotanical use of the leaves of Tamarindus indica L.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


This work is supported by the Institutional Funding of Universidad de Oriente, Cuba, and UNIFAP, Brazil. The authors wish to thank CNPq, Process no. 402332/2013-0.


  1. N. Deshwal, S. H. Kumar, and P. Sharma, “Review on hepatoprotective plants,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. E. E.-D. Yossef, A. A. Khedr, and M. Z. Mahran, “Hepatoprotective activity and antioxidant effects of El Nabka (Zizyphus spina-christi) fruits on rats hepatotoxicity induced by carbon tetrachloride,” Nature and Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. W. Martin, P. A. Mayes, V. W. Rodwell, and D. K. Granner, Harper's Review of Biochemistry, Lange Medical Publication, Los Altos, Calif, USA, 1985.
  4. J. T. Roig, Medicinal Plants, Aromatics and Poisoning of Cuba, Científico Técnica, La Habana, Cuba, 1988 (Spanish).
  5. K. El-Siddig, H. P. M. Gunasena, B. A. Prasad et al., Tamarind, Tamarindus indica, Southampton Centre for Underutilized Crops, Southampton, UK, 2006.
  6. J. Escalona-Arranz, R. Péres-Roses, I. Urdaneta-Laffita, M. Camacho-Pozo, J. Rodríguez-Amado, and I. Licea-Jiménez, “Antimicrobial activity of extracts from Tamarindus indica L. leaves,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 242–247, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. A. Pino, J. C. E. Escalona, I. Licea, R. Pérez, and J. Agüero, “Leaf oil of Tamarindus indica L.,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 187–188, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Komutarin, S. Azadi, L. Butterworth et al., “Extract of the seed coat of Tamarindus indica inhibits nitric oxide production by murine macrophages in vitro and in vivo,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Pimple, P. Kadam, N. Badgujar, A. Bafna, and M. Patil, “Protective effect of Tamarindus indica Linn against paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 827–831, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Babich, A. G. Schuck, J. H. Weisburg, and H. L. Zuckerbraun, “Research strategies in the study of the pro-oxidant nature of polyphenol nutraceuticals,” Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2011, Article ID 467305, 12 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Kulevanova and T. P. Kadifkova, “Antioxidant activity of essential oils of different Wild thymus l. Species,” Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. K. Yeon, P. Juhyun, H. L. Kwan et al., “Ferulic acid protects against carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury in mice,” Toxicology, vol. 282, no. 3, pp. 104–111, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. A. M. Aboul-Soud, A. M. Al-Othman, G. E. El-Desoky et al., “Hepatoprotective effects of vitamin e/selenium against malathion-induced injuries on the antioxidant status and apoptosis-related gene expression in rats,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. R. Jesus, L. P. Ariadna, C. s. Julio, M. Q. Humberto, I. C. Antonio, and C. T. Jose, “Optimization of a novel tablets formulation using D-optimal mixture design,” African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 474–483, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. R. Rodríguez, R. P. Rosés, J. C. Escalona, A. Lafourcade, and G. Sierra, “Standardization of the quality control parameters of the Tamarindus indica L. soft extract,” Revista Cubana de Plantas Medicinales, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–114, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. C. Rowe, Ed., Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipient, Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK; American Pharmacists Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  17. Guide for the Handling of the Laboratory Animal, International Council for Laboratory Animals Sciences, Commision of Live and Sciences, Mexico, DF, Mexico, 2002.
  18. B. Saraswat, P. K. S. Visen, G. K. Patnaik, and B. N. Dhawan, “Anticholestic effect of picroliv, active hepatoprotective principle of Picrorhiza kurrooa, against carbon tetrachloride induced cholestasis,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 316–318, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  19. W. H. Vogel, B. A. Scholkens, J. Sandow, and G. Muller, Drug Discovery and Evaluation, Pharmacological Assay, Spinger, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  20. O. Sorg, “Oxidative stress: a theoretical model or a biological reality?” Comptes Rendus-Biologies, vol. 327, no. 7, pp. 649–662, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. Han, S. Loukianoff, L. McLaughlin, K. S. Chandan, L. P. Facsm, and O. Fos, Handbook of Oxidants and Antioxidants in Exercise, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
  22. C. C. Allain, N. Richmond, and P. Rosechloy, “Cholestrol enzymatic colorimetric test,” Chemical Clinics, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 1350–1361, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Lee and D. Nieman, Nutritional Assessment, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2nd edition, 1996.
  24. R. K. Murray, D. K. Granner, P. H. Mayer, and V. W. Rodwel, Harper's Illustrated Biochemestry, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 26th edition, 2003.
  25. T. F. Slater, “Necrogenic action of CCl4 in the rat: a speculative mechanism based on activation,” Nature, vol. 209, no. 18, pp. 36–40, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  26. N. Kaplowitz, T. Y. Aw, F. R. Simon, and A. Stolz, “Drug-induced hepatotoxicity,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 826–839, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Bhatia, R. Prakash, and N. T. Prakash, “Enhanced antioxidant properties as a function of selenium uptake by edible mushrooms cultivated on selenium-accumulated waste post-harvest wheat and paddy residues,” International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 127–132, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Farghali, L. Kameniková, S. Hynie, and E. Kmonicková, “Silymarin effects on intracellular calcium and cytotoxicity: a study in perfused rat hepatocytes after oxidative stress injury,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Bhattacharya, R. Mukherjee, S. Pandit, N. Das, and T. K. Sur, “Prevention of carbon tetrachloride induced hepatotoxicity in rats by Himoliv®, a polyherbal formulation,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 35, pp. 183–185, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  30. P. Saha, K. Mazumder, P. K. Haldar, A. Bala, B. Kar, and S. Naskar, “Evaluation of hepatoprotective activity of Cucurbita maxima aerial parts,” Journal of Herbal Medicine and Toxicology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  31. H. Hajimehdipoor, R. Shahrestani, and M. Shekarchi, “Investigating the synergistic antioxidant effects of some flavonoid and phenolic compounds,” Research Journal of Pharmacognosy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 35–40, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  32. K. E. Hill, T. J. Montine, A. K. Motley, X. Li, J. M. May, and R. F. Burk, “Combined deficiency of vitamins E and C causes paralysis and death in guinea pigs,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1484–1488, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  33. G. Gupta, A. S. More, R. R. Kumari et al., “Protective effect of alcoholic extract of Entada pursaetha DC against CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. E. Omar, S. Abdel, A. A. Sleem, and M. S. Nermeen, “Hepatoprotective effects of citric acid and aspartame on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic damage in rats,” EXCLI Journal, vol. 8, pp. 41–49, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. C. Liolios, G. T. Sotiroudis, and I. Chinou, “Fatty acids, sterols, phenols and antioxidant activity of Phoenix theophrasti fruits growing in Crete, Greece,” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Ismail, A. Mariod, G. Bagalkotkar, and H. S. Ling, “Fatty acid composition and antioxidant activity of oils from two cultivars of Cantaloupe extracted by supercritical fluid extraction,” Grasas y Aceites, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S.-C. Lee, C.-C. Tsai, J.-C. Chen, C.-C. Lin, M.-L. Hu, and S. Lu, “The evaluation of reno- and hepato-protective effects of Huai-Shan-Yao (Rhizome dioscoreae),” American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 609–616, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. R. Hai, “Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: mechanism of action,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 12, supplement, pp. 3479S–3485S, 2004, Proceedings of the International Research Conference on Food, Nutrition, and Cancer. View at: Google Scholar
  39. P. Pedrielli and L. H. Skibsted, “Antioxidant synergy and regeneration effect of quercetin, (−)-epicatechin, and (+)-catechin on α-tocopherol in homogeneous solutions of peroxidating methyl linoleate,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 7138–7144, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Finotti, M. D'Ambrosio, F. Paoletti, V. Vivanti, and G. Quaglia, “Synergistic effects of α-tocopherol, β-sitosterol and squalene on antioxidant activity assayed by crocin bleaching method,” Nahrung, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 373–374, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  41. R. Ricciarelli, J.-M. Zingg, and A. Azzi, “Vitamin E: protective role of a Janus molecule,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 2314–2325, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Sonbolia, P. Salehib, K. M. Reza, and E. M. Nejad, “Antibacterial and antioxidant activity and essential oil composition of grammosciadium scabridum boiss,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 60, no. 7-8, pp. 534–538, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. H. Chen and C.-T. Ho, “Antioxidant activities of caffeic acid and its related hydroxycinnamic acid compounds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2374–2378, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y.-C. Chan, S.-C. Chang, S.-Y. Liu, H.-L. Yang, Y.-C. Hseu, and J.-W. Liao, “Beneficial effects of yam on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 161–167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Jesús Rafael Rodriguez Amado et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.