Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5123519, 6 pages
Research Article

Miconia sp. Increases mRNA Levels of PPAR Gamma and Inhibits Alpha Amylase and Alpha Glucosidase

1Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Pedro de Alba, s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 66455 San Nicolas de los Garza, NL, Mexico
2Facultad de Odontologia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Eduardo Aguirre Pequeño y Silao, s/n, Mitras Centro, 64460 Monterrey, NL, Mexico

Received 8 April 2016; Revised 2 June 2016; Accepted 12 June 2016

Academic Editor: Menaka C. Thounaojam

Copyright © 2016 David Mizael Ortíz-Martinez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Diabetes mellitus is a public health problem worldwide. For this reason, ethanolic extract of Miconia sp. from Oaxaca, Mexico, was selected in search of an alternative against this disease. The effect of Miconia sp. on mRNA expression of PPARγ on cell line 3T3-L1, its effect on alpha amylase and alpha glucosidase, lipid accumulation during adipogenesis, and cell viability on VERO cells were evaluated. The mRNA levels of PPARγ increased on folds, lipid accumulation was increased by 29.55% with Miconia sp. extract and 34.57% with rosiglitazone, and α-amylase and α-glycosidase were inhibited with IC50 values from μg/mL and μg/mL, respectively; the IC50 on antiproliferative activity on VERO cells was μg/mL. In case of α-amylase and α-glycosidase assays, IC50 (inhibitory concentration 50) refers to necessary extract amounts to inhibit 50% of enzymatic activity. On the other hand, on antiproliferative activity, IC50 (inhibitory concentration 50) refers to necessary extract amounts to inhibit 50% of cell proliferation. It was concluded that the compounds present in Miconia sp. ethanolic extract increase mRNA expression of PPARγ, inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase, and increase lipid accumulation. It constitutes an alternative as adjuvant in diabetes mellitus treatment; therefore, we recommend continuing identifying the compounds responsible for its promising in vivo antidiabetic activity.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease considered a serious global public health problem. In 2010, approximately 285 million people suffered from this disease and this amount is expected to double up within the next 20 years [1]. Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is the most common form of diabetes. It is a complex metabolic alteration characterized by an insulin combination resistance (IR, low sensitivity of one or multiple tissues to insulin) and insulin secretion alteration [2].

The search for new drugs that act against peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is very important because ligands of these transcription factors exhibit multiple biological responses such as decreasing the IR and avoiding high levels of plasm glucose. It has been shown that the adipogenesis process is under the control of a complex cascade of transcriptional regulatory factors in which PPARγ and other transcriptional factors of C/EBP family play a fundamental role [3, 4].

Enzymes α-amylase and α-glucosidase found in saliva and the brush border of the small intestine, respectively, act on hydrolysis oligosaccharides and disaccharides to produce easy absorption monosaccharides such as glucose. For the above mentioned, delaying absorption of glucose through inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates, carried out by alpha amylase and alpha glucosidase, could be another form of combating DM [4].

About 80% of the population worldwide use medicinal plants to treat various diseases. These constitute a major source of drugs; about 25% of prescribed drugs worldwide originate from plant species [5].

A species of the genre Miconia in Mexican traditional medicine is used in south Mexico as an alternative for diabetes mellitus treatment. However, such fact has not been scientifically confirmed yet. Miconia is a genus of about 1000 species distributed in tropical America and belongs to the Melastomataceae family, which has about 4300 species distributed in 166 genera. Very few studies on biological activity have been performed on this genre, but it has been shown that extracts and compounds isolated from species of the genus Miconia have antibiotic, antitumor, analgesic, and antimalarial activities. A phytochemical analysis of methanolic extract of Miconia cabucu reveals the presence of glycosylated flavonoids (quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol all with different glycosides), a tannin, and rare bioflavonoid. The phytochemical research of M. rubiginosa extract led to the identification of several glycosylated forms such as quercetin, gallic acid, and epicatechin. Similarly, quercetin, myricetin, and catechin derivatives M. stenostachya were found [6].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the Extract

Miconia sp. aerial part was collected in Oaxaca, Mexico. The plant was dried in shade at room temperature and extraction with ethanol was performed by the Soxhlet method (PYREX) for 48 h; solvent was removed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Yamato RE-200). Extract yield was determined and then stored at room temperature until it was used.

2.2. Cell Culture Preparation and Adipocyte Differentiation

Murine cell line 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were used. DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was used for propagation; it was incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 atmosphere, until reaching a confluence of 90%. The 100% confluency was used for adipocyte differentiation. It could be DMEM with 10% FBS, 1 μM dexamethasone, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, and 10 μg/mL insulin (all brands from Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After 48 hours of incubation (day 2), the differentiation medium was removed and replaced every 48 hours until maturation of adipocytes (days 9–11), with maturation medium of adipocytes (DMEM with 10% FBS and insulin 10 μg/mL called MM). The maturation was confirmed by microscope observation of the typical morphology of an adipocyte [710].

2.3. Expression of PPARγ in Adipocytes

The study was performed in the cell line 3T3-L1 differentiated, following the methodology described above, using microplate 6-well culture with an inoculum of 100,000 cells per well in a final volume of 2 mL with the corresponding culture medium. At day 10, adipocyte differentiation was observed and replaced in the medium (MM). The following treatments were added: Group 1: DMEM with 0.1% ethanol (expression control group), Group 2: MM supplemented with 1 μM of rosiglitazone (positive control), Group 3: MM supplemented with Miconia sp. extract (40 μg/mL), and Group 4: MM only to observe the effect of the medium. After 24 hours of treatment application of the total RNA extraction, the retrotranscription (cDNA) and PCR were performed in real time to determine the effect on mRNA expression [810].

The total RNA isolation of treated adipocytes was performed with an extraction kit SV Total RNA Isolation System # Z3100, Promega (following the manufacturer’s instructions) and stored at −80°C until use. Total RNA integrity, purity, and quantification analysis was made in NanoDrop 8000 Spectrophotometer with Thermo Scientific and an electrophoresis gel (1.5% agarose).

CDNA synthesis was done with the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System kit Promega # A3800 with 500 ng of RNA isolated. The cDNA was stored at −20°C, until use.

Analysis of mRNA expression PPARγ was performed by qRT-PCR using LightCycler 480 II Roche equipment, and 50 ng of cDNA, 0.5 μM of the primers, 12.5 μL of Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (2x) # K0251 Thermo Scientific, and the proper amount of nuclease-free water to have a final volume of 25 μL. The 36B4 was used [Thomson] as reference gene. The sequence of the primers used is PPARγ forward 5′-CTGGCCTCCCTGATGAATAAAG-3′, reverse 5′-AGGCTCCATAAAGTCACCAAAG-3′, 36B4 forward 5′-ACTGGTCTAGGACCCGAGAAG-3′, and reverse 5′-TCAATGGTGCCTCTGGAGATT-3′. The relative mRNA expression was calculated based on the method.

2.4. Lipid Accumulation in Adipocytes

Lipid accumulation was evaluated on the cell line 3T3-L1 using Oil Red O, with modifications to the method described by other authors. The method described above was used for cell differentiation. Microculture plates were used having 24 wells with an inoculum of 30,000 cells per well leading to a final volume of 500 μL with culture medium. At 48 h after confluence (day 0) the differentiation medium (Dm) was applied to stimulate adipogenesis, supplemented with the substances to be evaluated: treatment 1 [Dm (control reference)], treatment 2 [Dm supplemented with 40 μg/mL extract Miconia sp.], and treatment 3 [Dm supplemented with 1 μM rosiglitazone (positive control)]. Subsequently, the microplate was incubated for 48 h with the established conditions. After that, Dm was replaced by MM (day 2) and incubated for 8 d. The culture medium was removed, and formalin 10% was used for 1 h to fix monolayer cells. After monolayer cells had been washed twice with distilled water, the dye Oil Red O (0.5% in 60% isopropanol) was applied for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were washed three times with distilled water; the dye inside the cells was removed with 100% isopropanol and read the optical density at 540 nm [912].

2.5. Inhibitory Activity of α-Amylase

The enzyme inhibition was evaluated by the method of dinitrosalicylic acid 3,5-(DNS) with some modifications. The Miconia sp. extract was applied at different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 μg/mL) as a vehicle using phosphate buffer with 20 mM sodium 6.7 mM sodium chloride, at pH 6.9. α-Amylase enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich # A9857-250KU) was used at 0.5 U/mL concentration with the same buffer as a vehicle. Starch 0.5% in phosphate buffer was used as a substrate. Acarbose at different concentrations (312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, and 5000 μg/mL) was used as a positive control. Additionally, DNS solution was used at 96 mM. In 1.5 mL conical tubes, 50 μL of substances was placed to be evaluated: treatment 1: Miconia sp. extracts, treatment 2: buffer phosphate with 2% ethanol (negative control), and treatment 3: acarbose (positive control). Briefly, to the above treatments 50 μL of the α-amylase was added and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. After that, to initiate the reaction, 50 μL of the substrate was added immediately and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Then, the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of DNS and heated in a water bath at 95°C for 5 min; the tubes were left to cool at room temperature, and the optical density was measured at 540 nm. The absorbance rates were used to calculate the percent inhibition of each treatment using the following equation:In this equation, “Abs treatment” is the product’s light absorption of the enzyme-substrate reaction in the presence of the Miconia sp. or negative control as appropriate. “Abs control” is the reaction product’s light absorption of enzyme-substrate in the presence of phosphate buffer as a treatment. The percentage inhibition using the statistical package (SPSS v.20) allows us to calculate the inhibitory concentration: 50 (IC50) is the amount required to inhibit 50% of the enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich # A8980-1G) [5, 1315].

2.6. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

Inhibition of the enzyme was evaluated by the pNPG method (p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside) with some modifications. Miconia sp. extract at different concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL) was used as a vehicle a buffer of sodium phosphate mentioned above. Acarbose at different concentrations (62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) is positive control, using buffer sodium phosphate as a vehicle. α-Glucosidase enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich # G5003-100UN) at a concentration of 0.2 U/mL using phosphate buffer as a vehicle. Additionally, a preparation of pNPG 2 mM (Sigma-Aldrich # N1377-1G) was used as a substrate in the same vehicle. After that, in a 96-well microplate, 25 μL of the substances was mixed with the enzyme to the assay: treatment 1 [Miconia sp. extracts], treatment 2 [phosphate buffer with 1% ethanol (negative control)], and treatment 3 [acarbose (positive control)]. Besides the above treatments, 25 μL of the enzyme suspension was added and incubated at 37°C for 15 min; immediately after that, 50 μL of pNPG was added and incubated at 37°C for 10 min; then, the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL sodium carbonate (0.2 M).

Finally, the optical density at 405 nm was measured. The absorbance rates were used to calculate the percent inhibition of each treatment using the following equation:In this equation, “Abs treatment” is the product’s light absorption of the enzyme-substrate reaction in the presence of the Miconia sp., acarbose or negative control as appropriate. “Abs control” is the product’s light absorption of the enzyme-substrate reaction in the presence of phosphate buffer as a treatment. Percent inhibitions using a statistical package (SPSS v.20) were used to determine the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) that is the amount of treatment necessary to inhibit the enzyme 50% [4, 1315].

2.7. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation with MTT colorimetric method (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-y1)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was evaluated. The VERO cell (monkey kidney epithelial) lines are widely used in research to evaluate the effect of chemicals and toxins in mammals [16]. 1 × 105 cells/well were seeded in a 96-well microplate and adjusted to a final volume of 200 μL with culture medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS) and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. After 24 h and until reaching a layer of 80% confluence, the culture medium was removed and cells were washed with phosphates (PBS), a buffered saline solution; further substances were added and evaluated: treatment 1 [extracts of Miconia sp. (62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL)], treatment 2 [DMEM with 1% ethanol (negative control)], and treatment 3 [cells with culture medium (reference of proliferation)]. After that, the microplate was incubated for 24 h at the above conditions. Then, 10 μL MTT (5 mg/mL) were added to each well and incubated again for 4 h; the culture medium was removed and cells were washed with PBS. Immediately afterwards, 200 μL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added; then the optical density was measured at 570 nm. By the following formula the percentage of cell proliferation was determined:In this equation, “Abs treatment” is the product’s light absorption of the treated cells and “Abs control” is the product’s light absorption of cells used as proliferation reference. The IC50 is calculated with the percentages of cell proliferation and with the support of SPSS v.20 [17, 18].

3. Results

In this study, different biological activities of ethanolic extract of Miconia sp. were evaluated in their effect on expression of mRNA PPARγ, lipid accumulation during adipogenesis, the activity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, and the effect on proliferation of VERO cell line.

In determining the expression level of mRNA of PPARγ in mature mouse adipocytes, Group 1 was used as an expression control, which was normalized to a value of 1. Therefore, the values above 1 indicate an overexpression or upregulation. In Group 2 the value in the expression levels was fold change; at the same time, in Group 3 a value was and finally Group 4 showed a value of fold change (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Effect of different compounds on the expression of mRNA PPARγ. On day 10 the treatments were applied; Group 1: DMEM with 0.1% ethanol (EC), Group 2: MM and rosiglitazone (Ros) as a positive control, Group 3: MM and Miconia (Mic), and Group 4: MM. On day 11 of adipocyte differentiation the total RNA was isolated. : there is a significant difference with the control of expression; : there is a significant difference with the control of expression and rosiglitazone ().

Miconia sp. 40 μg/mL produced upregulation in the expression of mRNA of PPARγ with a value greater than that of the drug rosiglitazone, which increases the expression of PPARγ as expected. The use of maturation medium with both extracts as rosiglitazone did not increase by itself the expression levels of the gene PPARγ.

In the lipid accumulation test during adipogenesis with different treatments, Group 1 (Dm) showed absorbance of 0.137; this value represents the accumulated lipids during adipogenesis induced differentiation medium already established. At the same time, Group 2 (Dm + Miconia sp. 40 μg/mL) showed absorbance of 0.184; Group 3 (Dm + rosiglitazone 1 μM) showed an absorbance value of 0.177.

Taking the absorbance value from Group 1 as 100% lipid accumulation, when extract Miconia sp. was added to the differentiation medium, lipid accumulation was increased to 34.57% compared to Group 1. Like the Miconia sp. extract, adding the drug rosiglitazone to differentiation medium, it causes an increase of 29.55% compared to Group 1. The increased absorbance of the extract and the drug is significant compared with Dm; Miconia sp. presented a very similar result to rosiglitazone, difference between them not of great significance (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Effect of different substances in lipid accumulation during adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. The treatments were applied at day 0 of differentiation and withdrawn at day 2. On day 10 when adipocytes reached maturity, the staining was performed. significant difference between treatments and Dm ().

In the α-amylase inhibition assay, different treatments to the mixture of enzyme-substrate reaction were added, obtaining the following results: for treatment 1, Miconia sp. presented IC50 of μg/mL. At the same time, for treatment 2, phosphate buffer and 2% ethanol (negative control) showed no inhibition by the vehicle used; for treatment 3: acarbose presented IC50 of μg/mL (positive control).

According to the results and despite being a complete extract, the extract of Miconia sp. reveals a greater capacity than acarbose to inhibit 50% of enzyme activity; this difference between the two treatments is statistically significant (Table 1).

Table 1: Enzymatic inhibition from acarbose and Miconia sp. extract.

In the inhibition assay of α-glucosidase, the following results were obtained: for treatment 1, Miconia sp. extract provided IC50 of μg/mL. At the same time, for treatment 2, phosphate buffer with 1% ethanol (negative control) did not show any inhibitory effect on the enzyme; for treatment 3, acarbose (positive control) showed IC50 of μg/mL (Table 1).

Miconia sp. extract also has a greater inhibition than acarbose, and acarbose is used as a reference compound in the inhibition of these enzymes. The differences in the treatments are statistically significant.

In determining the proliferation on the VERO cell line, IC50 of  mg/mL considered toxic was obtained for Miconia sp. extract.

4. Discussion

PPARγ is a nuclear receptor that acts as a transcription factor; it improves insulin sensitivity by the cells and enhances glucose utilization [19]. A diverse set of natural and synthetic molecules is classified as ligands and can induce activation and that expression of PPARγ. These ligands include nutrients, endogenous ligands, and drugs [20]; one of those drugs is thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as rosiglitazone. Miconia sp. showed an increased mRNA expression of PPARγ, even more than rosiglitazone. Moreover, Miconia sp. was able to increase lipid accumulation during adipogenesis in 3T3 cell line L-1 similar to positive control rosiglitazone. It is known that PPARγ is the master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, and during adipogenesis PPARγ is induced [21]. PPARγ activation in adipocytes ensures proper balance and secretion of adipokines, such as leptin and adiponectin; they are mediators in insulin action in peripheral tissues, which causes insulin sensitivity throughout the body [22]. The products mentioned above that stimulate the production of PPARγ are candidates to induce the proper functioning of insulin and recognition, considering them as potential antidiabetic agents.

The results suggest that the presence of secondary metabolites could be involved in upregulation of PPARγ gen. Quercetin, catechin, and kaempferol have been reported in some species of Miconia sp. and these compounds could act as ligands of PPARγ [6, 21] just as rosiglitazone does. Some TZDs as rosiglitazone have been associated with a significant increase of cardiovascular diseases. For this reason, FDA restricted their prescription in the United States [23].

Avoiding the increase of postprandial glucose is important to keep the glycemic levels low in diabetic patients. The inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase present in the gastrointestinal tract could keep the levels of glycemia low. Drugs inhibit these enzymes, such as acarbose, miglitol, voglibose, nojirimycin, and 1-deoxynojirimycin, which allow the slow absorption of carbohydrates [23]. The ethanolic extract of Miconia sp. inhibits α-amylase by 50% to a less concentration than the acarbose drug. Additionally, the α-glucosidase is inhibited by Miconia sp. at low concentrations, lower than the drug. Therefore, it is believed that in the presence of molecules with antihyperglycemic effect in in vitro model, these compounds could be an alternative to existing treatments or adjunctive to them, which may have undesired side effects.

Miconia sp. showed cytotoxicity at a greater concentration than necessary to increase expression of PPARγ, increase lipid accumulation, and inhibit α-glucosidase and α-amylase. There are reports that the species of the genus Miconia, M. stenostachya, M. cabucu, M. albicans, and M. rubiginosa, lack cytotoxicity or mutagenicity at lower concentrations of 100 μg/mL [6].

5. Conclusions

The ethanolic extract of Miconia sp. showed increase of the level of mRNA expression of PPARγ at a significantly higher level than rosiglitazone (drug). Also, Miconia sp. showed inhibition of the enzymes α-glucosidase and α-amylase with IC50 lower than acarbose (drug) and furthermore increase the capacity of lipid accumulation during adipogenesis, similar to the drug rosiglitazone. At the same time, Miconia sp. showed cytotoxicity on VERO cells with a concentration higher than that presenting biological activity. For this reason, the compounds present in the ethanolic extract of Miconia sp. can be an alternative for the treatment of diabetes mellitus or like an adjunctive, with the recommendation of continuing with in vivo tests and elucidation of bioactive compounds.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. Chen, Y. Wu, J. Zou, and K. Gao, “α-Glucosidase inhibition and antihyperglycemic activity of flavonoids from Ampelopsis grossedentata and the flavonoid derivatives,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1488––1494, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. F. Ascaso, “Diabetes mellitus tipo 2: nuevos tratamientos,” Medicina Clínica, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 117–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. E. Ràfols, “Tejido adiposo: heterogeneidad celular y diversidad funcional,” Endocrinología y Nutrición, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 100–112, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Ghosh and L. Rangan, “Molecular docking and inhibition studies of α-amylase activity by labdane diterpenes from Alpinia nigra seeds,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 4836–4852, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Josabad Alonso-Castro, J. Jose Maldonado-Miranda, A. Zarate-Martinez et al., “Medicinal plants used in the Huasteca Potosina, México,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 292–298, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Serpeloni, G. R. Mazzaron, M. Prates et al., “Experimental and toxicologic pathology cytotoxic and mutagenic evaluation of extracts from plant species of the Miconia genus and their influence on doxorubicin-induced mutagenicity: an in vitro analysis,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 63, pp. 499–504, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. J. Richard, T. P. Burris, D. Sanchez-Infantes, Y. Wang, D. M. Ribnicky, and J. M. Stephens, “Artemisia extracts activate PPARγ, promote adipogenesis, and enhance insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue of obese mice,” Nutrition, vol. 30, no. 7-8, pp. S31–S36, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C.-S. Kong, J.-A. Kim, S.-S. Bak, H.-G. Byun, and S.-K. Kim, “Anti-obesity effect of carboxymethyl chitin by AMPK and aquaporin-7 pathways in 3T3-L1 adipocytes,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 276–281, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Chaiittianan, P. Chayopas, A. Rattanathongkom, P. Tippayawat, and K. Sutthanut, “Anti-obesity potential of corn silks: relationships of phytochemicals and antioxidation, anti-pre-adipocyte proliferation, anti-adipogenesis, and lipolysis induction,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 23, pp. 497–510, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. X. C. Tan, K. H. Chua, M. Ravishankar Ram, and U. R. Kuppusamy, “Monoterpenes: novel insights into their biological effects and roles on glucose uptake and lipid metabolism in 3T3-L1 adipocytes,” Food Chemistry, vol. 196, pp. 242–250, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H.-L. Kim, J. Park, H. Park et al., “Platycodon grandiflorum A. de candolle ethanolic extract inhibits adipogenic regulators in 3T3-L1 cells and induces mitochondrial biogenesis in primary brown preadipocytes,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 35, pp. 7721–7730, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. M. Siraj, S. Natarajan, M. A. Huq, Y. J. Kim, and D. C. Yang, “Structural investigation of ginsenoside Rf with PPARγ major transcriptional factor of adipogenesis and its impact on adipocyte,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. S. Nyambe, J. A. Villa, I. Ifie et al., “Inhibition of human α-amylase by dietary polyphenols,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 19, pp. 723–732, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  14. C.-W. Liu, Y.-C. Wang, H.-C. Lu, and W.-D. Chiang, “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction conditions for total phenols with anti-hyperglycemic activity from Psidium guajava leaves,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1601–1605, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Dehghan, Y. Sarrafi, and P. Salehi, “Antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of 11 herbal plants from Hyrcania region, Iran,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 179–188, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. C. Ammerman, M. Beier-Sexton, and A. F. Azad, “Growth and maintenance of Vero cell lines,” Current Protocols in Microbiology, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. B. Kling, D. Bücherl, P. Palatzky et al., “Flavonoids, flavonoid metabolites, and phenolic acids inhibit oxidative stress in the neuronal cell line HT-22 monitored by ECIS and MTT assay: a comparative study,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 446–454, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Boncler, M. Różalski, U. Krajewska, A. Podsędek, and C. Watala, “Comparison of PrestoBlue and MTT assays of cellular viability in the assessment of anti-proliferative effects of plant extracts on human endothelial cells,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Kariharan, G. Nanayakkara, K. Parameshwaran et al., “Central activation of PPAR-gamma ameliorates diabetes induced cognitive dysfunction and improves BDNF expression,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1451–1461, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. N. Lewis, J. Bassaganya-Riera, and D. R. Bevan, “Virtual screening as a technique for PPAR modulator discovery,” PPAR Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 861238, 10 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Wang, B. Waltenberger, E.-M. Pferschy-Wenzig et al., “Natural product agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ): a review,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 73–89, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Janani and B. D. Ranjitha, “PPAR gamma gene—a review,” Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Oboh, O. B. Ogunsuyi, M. D. Ogunbadejo, and S. A. Adefegha, “Influence of gallic acid on α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory properties of acarbose,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar