Thai Fruits Exhibit Antioxidant Activity and Induction of Antioxidant Enzymes in HEK-293 Cells

Anantachoke, Natthinee; Lomarat, Pattamapan; Praserttirachai, Wasin; Khammanit, Ruksinee; Mangmool, Supachoke

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6083136

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 6083136 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6083136

Thai Fruits Exhibit Antioxidant Activity and Induction of Antioxidant Enzymes in HEK-293 Cells

Natthinee Anantachoke,¹Pattamapan Lomarat,²Wasin Praserttirachai,²Ruksinee Khammanit,³and Supachoke Mangmool³

Academic Editor: G. K. Jayaprakasha

Received29 Jun 2016

Revised25 Oct 2016

Accepted31 Oct 2016

Published18 Dec 2016

Abstract

The cellular antioxidant enzymes play the important role of protecting the cells and organisms from the oxidative damage. Natural antioxidants contained in fruits have attracted considerable interest because of their presumed safety and potential nutritional value. Even though antioxidant activities of many fruits have been reported, the effects of phytochemicals contained in fruits on the induction of antioxidant enzymes in the cells have not been fully defined. In this study, we showed that extracts from Antidesma ghaesembilla, Averrhoa bilimbi, Malpighia glabra, Mangifera indica, Sandoricum koetjape, Syzygium malaccense, and Ziziphus jujuba inhibited H₂O₂-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species production in HEK-293 cells. Additionally, these Thai fruit extracts increased the mRNA and protein expressions of antioxidant enzymes, catalase, glutathione peroxidase-1, and manganese superoxide dismutase. The consumption of Thai fruits rich in phenolic compounds may reduce the risk of oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between endogenous antioxidant defense mechanisms and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which at high levels can cause cell injury and damage through modifications of proteins, lipids, and DNA. Increased oxidative stress is involved in the pathophysiology of many diseases such as cardiovascular diseases [1], neurodegenerative diseases [2], and diabetes [3]. The cellular antioxidant enzymes play the important role of protecting the cells and organisms from the oxidative damage. For instance, superoxide dismutase (SOD) acts as a catalyst to convert superoxide radicals into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide [4]. The hydrogen peroxide converts into water and oxygen by catalase to protect the cells from accumulation of H₂O₂ [5]. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is the important enzyme to remove H₂O₂ by using glutathione as a substrate [6]. Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) is involved in antistress of physiological conditions including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [7].

Epidemiological studies have found that consumption of fruits and vegetables has attracted growing interest because of their significant role in reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and other chronic diseases [8]. Consumption of antioxidants, through diet and supplements, is expected to remove ROS from the living system and provide health benefits. Several studies demonstrated that medicinal plants and fruits are a rich source of antioxidant compounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, quinones, vitamins, and alkaloids, which can decrease the incidence of oxidative stress and associated diseases [9–11]. Previous studies showed that the phytochemicals, especially phenolics, in fruits are the major bioactive compounds showing potent antioxidant effects [12–14]. There was a direct relationship between the total phenolic contents and the antioxidant activities in fruits [13–15].

Natural antioxidants that are presented in fruits have attracted considerable interest because of their presumed safety and potential nutritional and therapeutic value. The increased interest in natural antioxidants has led to the antioxidant evaluation of many species of fruits. Even though antioxidant activities of many fruits have been reported and the results showed that some of them could be rich sources of natural antioxidants, the effects of phytochemicals contained in fruits on the induction of antioxidant enzymes in the cells have not been fully defined. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the profiles of total phenolics, total flavonoids, the antioxidant activities of Thai fruit extracts, and the molecular mechanisms of Thai fruit extracts on H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress in HEK-293 cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), gallic acid, ascorbic acid, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox®), sodium nitrite, aluminium chloride hexahydrate, sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), and dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) acetate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum, 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution, and penicillin-streptomycin solution were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY). Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent was purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Anhydrous sodium carbonate was available from Ajax Finechem (Auckland, New Zealand).

2.2. Plant Materials

The fruits of Antidesma ghaesembilla Gaertn. (Phyllanthaceae), Artocarpus integer (Thumb.) Merr. (Moraceae), Averrhoa bilimbi L. (Oxalidaceae), and Mangifera foetida Lour. (Anacardiaceae) were collected from Ranong Province, Thailand, while the fruits of Durio zibethinus L. cultivar Mon Thong (Malvaceae), Malpighia glabra L. (Malpighiaceae), Mangifera indica L. cultivar Aok Rong (Anacardiaceae), Musa paradisiaca cultivar Awak (Musaceae), Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. f.) Merr. cultivar Tuptim (Meliaceae), Syzygium malaccense (L.) Merr. & Perry (Myrtaceae), and Ziziphus jujuba Mill. cultivar Milk Jujube (Rhamnaceae) were purchased from local markets in Bangkok, Thailand. The plants were identified by Professor Wongsatit Chuakul, the botanist and lecturer in the Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University.

2.3. Preparation of Extracts

Edible portions of the fresh fruits were run through a food chopper. The finely chopped fruits were dried by freeze dryer (FreeZone, Labconco). The coarsely ground dried fruits (50 g) were extracted with methanol (300–500 ml × 3 times). After filtration through filter paper (number 1, Whatman Inc.), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator and the crude methanol extracts were stored at −20°C until analysis.

2.4. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

Total phenolic content of the fruit extracts was analyzed by the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method described previously [16] with minor modifications. Stock solutions of the fruit extracts with concentration of 1.5 mg/ml were prepared in 50% methanol. Twenty microliters of the stock solutions was mixed with 50 μl of 10% Folin–Ciocalteu reagent in 96-well plates and allowed to react for 3 min. The mixtures were then neutralized by adding 80 μl of 7.5% of sodium carbonate solution. After incubation at room temperature for 2 h, the absorbance was recorded at 765 nm by an Infinite M200 Microplate Reader (Tecan). The assay was measured in triplicate and the results were calculated using a calibration curve for gallic acid (0.625 to 30 μg/ml) and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 100 g fresh weight (mg GAE/100 g FW).

2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

Total flavonoid content was determined by aluminium chloride colorimetric test modified from previous study [17]. One hundred and sixty microliters of sterile water was added to the test tube followed by 40 μl of the fruit extracts dissolved in sterile water at the concentration of 1 mg/ml and 15 μl of 5% NaNO₂. After 5 min, 24 μl of 10% AlCl₃·6H₂O was added. The mixture was allowed to react for 6 min. Lastly, 80 μl of 1 M NaOH and 80 μl of sterile water were added and well mixed. Then 250 μl of reaction mixture was transferred to 96-well plate. The plate was shaken for 30 sec and the absorbances were read at 510 nm by microplate reader. The total flavonoid content was expressed as quercetin equivalent per 100 g fresh weight (mg QE/100 g FW) which was calculated from the regression equation obtained from graph plotted between the absorbance and the concentration of quercetin at various concentrations (4–1,500 μg/ml). The assay was performed in triplicate.

2.6. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Assay

Free radical-scavenging activity of the fruit extracts was determined based on the reduction of DPPH radicals by means of the modified spectrophotometric method in 96-well plates. The test samples were prepared at concentration of 2 mg/ml in methanol and mixed with 0.02% w/v DPPH radical methanolic solution 1 : 1 ratio in triplicate. The reaction mixtures were allowed to stand in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm using Infinite M200 Microplate Reader (Tecan). The DPPH radical-scavenging ability was calculated as percent inhibition by the following equation: . The DPPH radical-scavenging activity of the fruit extracts was expressed as the IC₅₀values (μg/ml) (inhibition of DPPH radical formation by 50% at concentration of 1 mg/ml). 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) was used as a positive control.

2.7. Cell Culture

Human embryonic kidney-293 (HEK-293) cells were cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin solution in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ at 37°C as previously described [18]. Under serum starvation conditions, cells were treated with crude extract of Thai fruits.

2.8. MTT Assay

Cell viability was performed by the MTT assay according to the method previously described [19]. Cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 10⁴ cells/well, in a total volume of 200 μl of DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin.

Cells were allowed to adhere to plate for 24 h, before being treated with solvent (vehicle control) and crude extracts at various concentrations (0.01–2000 μg/ml) for 24 h. The experiments were performed in 2 replicate wells. The relative number of viable cells was then determined at 24 h after incubation, by adding 2 mg/ml of MTT solution and further incubating the cell for 4 h. The formazan crystals formed were then solubilized with DMSO. The plate was read using an Infinite M200 Microplate Reader (Tecan) at wavelength of 570 nm. The absorption value of the solution at 570 nm directly represents relative cell numbers. The percentage of cell viability was calculated according to the following equation:

2.9. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Level

The intracellular antioxidant activities of the crude extract of Thai fruits were quantified using a fluorescent probe dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) diacetate (Sigma-Aldrich) to estimate the intracellular ROS production in the cell as previously described [20]. HEK-293 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate (5 × 10⁴ cells/well) or 35-mm glass bottomed dishes (1 × 10⁵ cells/dish) and treated with Thai fruit extracts (10 and 100 μg/ml) for 12 h. After 12 h, the cells were then incubated with 100 μM of H₂O₂ for 2 h and washed once with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4. Thereafter, 10 μM DCFH-DA was added and incubated with the cells at 37°C in the dark for 30 min. The fluorescence intensity of DCF was determined using Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments) with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 530 nm. To monitor the ROS production in living cells, HEK-293 cells were visualized using single-line excitation (488 nm) of an IX-81 fluorescence microscope (Olympus) with a 40x (NA 1.4) objective lens (Olympus).

2.10. mRNA Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR

The extraction of RNA was performed by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) as previously described [21]. RT-qPCRs for RNA expression were performed by using the KAPA SYBR FAST One-Step RT-qPCR Kit (KAPA biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCRs were performed on Mx 3005p Real-Time PCR System (Stratagene). We designed and synthesized the primers as follows: human GPx-1 (sense, 5′-ctcttcgagaagtgcgaggt-3′; antisense, 5′-tcgatgtcaatggtctggaa-3′), human catalase (sense, 5′-gcagatacctgtgaactgtc-3′; antisense, 5′-gtagaatgtccgcacctgag-3′), human HO-1 (sense, 5′-caggcagagaatgctgag-3′; antisense, 5′-gcttcacatagcgctgca-3′), human Mn-SOD (sense, 5′-gcacattaacgcgcagatca-3′; antisense, 5′-agcctccagcaactctcctt-3′), human CuZn-SOD (sense, 5′-aaggccgtgtgcgtgaa-3′; antisense, 5′-caggtctccaacatgcctct-3′), human GRe (sense, 5′-cagtgggactcacggaagat-3′; antisense, 5′-ttcactgcaacagcaaaacc-3′), and human GAPDH (sense, 5′-cgagatccctccaaaatcaa-3′; antisense, 5′-gtcttctgggtggcagtgat-3′).

2.11. Western Blotting

Protein expression of antioxidant enzymes was performed by Western blotting as previously described [20]. Following stimulation, cells were washed once with PBS and solubilized in lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.8% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 100 μM PMSF, 5 μg/ml aprotinin, and 5 μg/ml leupeptin. Protein concentration of cell lysates was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit with bovine serum albumin as standard. Samples were mixed with loading buffer and denatured by heating at 95°C for 5 min prior to separation by SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad) and subjected to immunoblotting with primary antibodies to catalase (Cell Signaling), Mn-SOD (Cell Signaling), GPx-1 (Abcam), and GAPDH (Cell Signaling). Immunoblots were visualized with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and a chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare).

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical analysis was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test, and values of were considered to be significant.

3. Results

3.1. Yields of Thai Fruit Extracts

Eleven fruit samples were collected and bought from southern and central regions of Thailand and were authenticated by a botanist. The scientific names of the plants are shown in Table 1. Although there are many kinds of fruits in Thailand, in this study, we chose only 11 fruits that have a potential effect on inhibition of oxidative stress. Thai people consume significant amount of the investigated fruits at a ripe stage and the yields of the crude methanol extracts of Thai fruits ranged from 2.68 to 9.28% of fresh weight (edible part of fresh fruits weight) (Table 1).

3.2. Determination of Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents of Thai Fruit Extracts

The total phenolic contents were determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, a simple and widely used method, which relied on the transfer of electrons from phenolic compounds to the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent in alkaline medium. As shown in Table 1, the total phenolic contents of 11 selected Thai fruits are expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 100 g of fresh weight (FW). Among all the fruits analyzed, the highest phenolic content was found in M. glabra ( mg GAE/100 g FW), followed by S. koetjape (), A. ghaesembilla (), M. indica (), Z. jujuba (), M. foetida (), A. bilimbi (), and S. malaccense () (Table 1). Phenolic content was slightly lower in A. integer and D. zibethinus. M. paradisiaca cultivar Awak had the lowest total phenolic content among the tested fruits (Table 1).

The total flavonoid contents of 11 selected Thai fruits are expressed as mg of quercetin equivalent (QE) per 100 g of fresh weight (mg QE/100 g FW). As shown in Table 1, total flavonoid contents of Thai fruit extracts ranged from to mg QE/100 g FW. The highest flavonoid content was found in S. koetjape, which had mg QE/100 g FW, followed by M. glabra, A. integer, A. ghaesembilla, D. zibethinus, A. bilimbi, and M. foetida, the values of which were 195.36 ± 0.14, 158.31 ± 1.02, 134.06 ± 2.90, , , and mg QE/100 g FW, respectively. Flavonoid content was lower in S. malaccense and M. paradisiaca. On the other hand, Z. jujuba had the lowest content of total flavonoid (), while that of M. indica was not detected.

3.3. DPPH Scavenging Activities of Thai Fruit Extracts

We next determined the antioxidant activity of fruit extracts using DPPH method. This assay based on the measurement of the antioxidant ability to scavenge the stable organic radical DPPH and used Trolox as positive control with the IC₅₀ of μg/ml. As shown in Table 1, the extract of M. glabra at the concentration of 1 mg/ml exhibited the highest DPPH free radical-scavenging activity with % of inhibition (IC₅₀of μg/ml), which related to the high total phenolic content ( mg GAE/100 g FW). The extracts of S. koetjape showed moderate DPPH scavenging activities 84.73 ± 1.38 (IC₅₀ of 415.8 ± 1.5 µg/ml), followed by A. ghaesembilla (67.65 ± 0.31; IC₅₀ of 648.0 ± 6.2 µg/ml), M. indica (44.85 ± 0.71), and A. bilimbi (30.66 ± 1.96). The extracts of D. zibethinus, M. paradisiaca, and Z. jujuba had DPPH scavenging activity less than 10% of inhibition (Table 1).

3.4. Correlation between Antioxidant Capacity and Total Phenolic Content

The correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity using DPPH assay of fruit extracts was determined and shown in Figure 1. A positive correlation () between the DPPH scavenging value and total phenolic content indicated that phenolic compounds mainly contributed to the antioxidant activities of these fruits. This result was in agreement with several previous studies [15]. However, some fruits containing high total flavonoid compounds, such as A. integer and D. zibethinus (158.31 ± 1.02 and 93.85 ± 0.36 mg QE/100 g FW, resp.) did not exhibit strong antioxidant capacity. In contrast, S. koetjape and M. glabra that contained higher flavonoid contents elicited strong DPPH scavenging activity with and % of inhibition, respectively. Thus, the correlations between antioxidant activity and total flavonoid contents of Thai fruit extracts were poor () (Figure 1). According to their high antioxidants activities, it could be speculated that these fruits will be beneficial for inhibition of oxidative stress.

3.5. Thai Fruit Extract Inhibits H₂O₂-Induced Intracellular ROS Production in HEK-293 Cells

We first assessed the cell cytotoxicity of crude extracts of 11 Thai fruits on HEK-293 cells by using MTT assay to determine the optimal concentrations of the crude extract for measurement of intracellular antioxidant activity. We found that Thai fruit extracts at the concentration of 0.01–100 μg/ml were not toxic to HEK-293 cells (Figure 2). Upon treatment of the cells with the crude extracts more than 100 μg/ml, the cell viabilities of HEK-293 were less than 80%. The concentrations used in further experiment were 10 and 100 μg/ml for the fruit extracts in order to prevent the cytotoxic effect and allow at least 80% cells survival.

We next investigated whether Thai fruit extract inhibits H₂O₂-induced intracellular ROS production in HEK-293 cells. The intracellular ROS levels were measured by using a fluorescent probe, DCFH-DA. After incubation with H₂O₂, the levels of intracellular ROS significantly increased compared to that of control (vehicle) group (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3(a), treatment with A. ghaesembilla and A. bilimbi significantly inhibited H₂O₂-induced ROS production in a dose-dependent manner, whereas treatment with A. integer and D. zibethinus did not show the inhibitory effect on H₂O₂-induced ROS production. In addition, the crude extracts of M. glabra and M. indica showed a significant reduction in ROS production, which has effects similar to those of vitamin C (a potent antioxidant), whereas treatment with extracts of M. foetida and M. paradisiaca had no effect (Figure 3(b)). Moreover, treatment with fruit extracts of S. koetjape, S. malaccense, and Z. jujuba also suppressed H₂O₂-induced ROS production in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

As shown in Figure 3, the fruit extracts of A. ghaesembilla, A. bilimbi, M. glabra, M. indica, S. koetjape, S. malaccense, and Z. jujuba have the antioxidant effects by preventing the production of intracellular ROS induced by H₂O₂. We further quantified ROS production in intact HEK-293 cells using the fluorescent microscope. Incubation of HEK-293 cells with H₂O₂ induced a significant increase in the fluorescence intensity of dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) as shown in green color in intact cells of the control (vehicle) group (Figure 4). Treatment with fruit extracts of A. ghaesembilla, A. bilimbi, M. glabra, M. indica, S. koetjape, S. malaccense, and Z. jujuba decreased the fluorescence intensity of DCF, suggesting that these fruits suppressed the ROS production in intact cells. However, treatment with fruits extracts of A. integer, D. zibethinus, M. foetida, and M. paradisiaca did not reduce the fluorescence intensity of DCF inducing by H₂O₂ compared to that of control. Taken together, these data demonstrated that Thai fruits have the antioxidant effects by preventing the production of ROS in HEK-293 cells.

(a)

(b)

3.6. Induction of mRNA Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes by Thai Fruit Extracts

Antioxidant enzymes (e.g., GPx-1, catalase, Mn-SOD, CuZn-SOD, and HO-1) are the major components of antioxidant signaling cascade in many cell types. Treatment with A. bilimbi extract elicits the antioxidant effect by increasing the activity of SOD and GPx both in blood and in tissues (e.g., liver, kidney, and heart) of rats [22]. Moreover, an aqueous extract of M. indica inhibited oxidative stress by enhancing the production of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and catalase [23]. Consistent with these previous studies, we showed that treatment with fruit extracts of M. glabra, S. malaccense, M. indica, and A. bilimbi significantly elevated the mRNA level of Mn-SOD (Figure 5(a)). Moreover, the GPx-1 mRNA expression significantly increased when treated with fruit extracts of S. malaccense, S. koetjape, M. indica, A. bilimbi, Z. jujuba, and A. ghaesembilla (Figure 5(b)). In addition, the mRNA level of catalase also increased after treatment with fruit extracts from M glabra, M. indica, Z. jujuba, and A. ghaesembilla (Figure 5(c)). However, all Thai fruit extracts failed to induce the mRNA expressions of CuZn-SOD, GRe, and HO-1 in HEK-293 cells (Figures 5(d)–5(f), resp.). Collectively our results showed that Thai fruit extracts play an important role in the prevention of oxidative stress by enhancing the mRNA expression of these antioxidant enzymes in HEK-293 cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.7. Thai Fruit Extracts Increased Protein Level of Antioxidant Enzymes

As shown in Figure 5, the mRNA expressions of Mn-SOD, GPx-1, and catalase were increased after treatment with the Thai fruit extracts. We next investigated the effects of these fruit extracts on the protein expressions of these antioxidant enzymes. We found that treatment with fruit extracts of M. glabra, S. malaccense, M. indica, and A. bilimbi at the concentration of 100 μg/ml for 24 h significantly elevated the protein level of Mn-SOD (Figure 6, upper-right panel). Similar to the mRNA expression experiments, the results of protein expression revealed that treatment with fruit extracts of S. malaccense, S. koetjape, M. indica, A. bilimbi, Z. jujuba, and A. ghaesembilla caused an increase in the GPx-1 protein level compared with the control (vehicle) (Figure 6, lower-left panel). Moreover, the protein levels of catalase significantly increased after treatment with crude extracts of M. glabra, M. indica, and A. ghaesembilla for 24 h, whereas the catalase protein level tended to increase after treatment with crude extract of Z. jujuba (Figure 6, lower-right panel). These results indicated that Thai fruits prevent the oxidative stress by enhancing the protein synthesis of antioxidant enzymes.

4. Discussion

In this study, we provide a new molecular mechanism of Thai fruits extracts on the inhibition of oxidative stress in HEK-293 cells. We demonstrate that ethanol extracts from A. ghaesembilla, A. bilimbi, M. glabra, M. indica, S. koetjape, S. malaccense, and Z. jujuba have antioxidant effects by suppressing ROS production and inducing the synthesis of antioxidant enzymes such as GPx-1, catalase, and Mn-SOD in HEK-293 cells.

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases, such as cancer, heart diseases, and diabetes [1–3]. The nonenzymatic antioxidant defense system of the body is made up of some antioxidants, such as vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamin K, and glutathione. The exogenous antioxidants are mainly comprised of synthetic and natural antioxidants. Medicinal plants have been used to treat human diseases for thousands of years. People are becoming increasingly interested in medicinal plants, including fruits because of their good therapeutic performance and low toxicity. Fruits are potential sources of natural antioxidants and have been shown in epidemiological studies to be protective against several chronic diseases associated with aging such as cancer, immune dysfunction, and cardiovascular diseases [8]. These natural protective effects have been attributed to various components such as carotenoids, vitamins C and E, and phenolic compounds [24, 25]. Thus, the interest in phytochemicals including phenolic compounds derived from fruits and their roles in inhibition of oxidative stress are therefore increasing.

The antioxidative effects of Thai fruit extracts could be due to the presence of phenolic compounds. Studies have also shown that phenolic compounds from various sources are effective in improving antioxidant enzymes, suggesting their role in the prevention and treatment of oxidative stress-related diseases. Hence, the consumption of phenolic-rich fruits has been associated with reduced levels of ROS in animal experiments [10, 26]. Likewise, a high intake of phenolic-rich fruits has been reported to enhance the activities of the antioxidant enzymes [27]. It was reported that the antioxidant activity of raspberry and santol (S. koetjape) was directly related to the phenolic content [28]. In addition, the juice of Ziziphus mauritiana that has a moderate total phenolic content and low content of vitamin C elicits the antioxidant activity [29]. Consistent with these previous studies, our study demonstrated that the extract from M. glabra has the highest phenolic content, followed by S. koetjape, A. ghaesembilla, M. indica, Z. jujuba, M. foetida, A. bilimbi, and S. malaccense (Table 1). These Thai fruit extracts exhibited the antioxidant activity as determined by DPPH assay.

The correlation between total antioxidant capacities obtained from DPPH assay is shown in Figure 1. There was a direct linear relationship between the phenolic contents and total antioxidant activities in the tested 11 Thai fruits (R² = 0.6317). The higher total phenolic content in fruits resulted in higher total antioxidant activity. Similarly, previous study reported a significant positive correlation between the antioxidant capacity and the contents of total flavonoids and total phenolics in celery [30]. Moreover, antioxidant activities assayed by DPPH and FRAP methods showed strongly positive relationship with total phenolic content in Oxalidaceae fruits [31]. Taken together, these results suggested that phenolic compounds may be the major contributor to the total antioxidant activities of fruits. However, our results demonstrated a weak correlation (R² = 0.3843) between the DPPH scavenging activity and total flavonoid content suggesting that flavonoid compounds could not be main components responsible for DPPH scavenging activity of some fruits, such as M. indica, S. koetjape, and M. glabra.

In our present study, we found that, among the tested 11 Thai fruits tested, 7 of them showed the ability to inhibit H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress in HEK-293 cells. Previous study demonstrated that the administration of phenolic acids (i.e., gentisic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid) in rat at a concentration of 100 mg/kg exhibited an induction of hepatic antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and GPx [10]. This suggested that modulation of antioxidant enzymes and oxidative status in the liver by phenolic acids may play an important role in the protection against oxidative damage. Therefore, further identification of phytochemicals corresponded to antioxidant activities of Thai fruits are worth investigating.

Interestingly, the antioxidant effects of fruits might be due to the induction of antioxidant genes such as SOD and GPx [32, 33]. Fruit extracts from Averrhoa carambola (star fruit) also induced the activities of enzymatic antioxidants (i.e., SOD and catalase) and nonenzymatic antioxidant and reduced glutathione in mice [34]. Consistent with these previous studies, we showed that treatment with the Thai fruit extracts from M. glabra, S. malaccense, M. indica, and A. bilimbi induced the mRNA and protein expressions of Mn-SOD. We also demonstrated that fruit extracts from M. glabra, M. indica, and A. ghaesembilla are able to induce the mRNA and protein expressions of other antioxidant enzymes such as catalase. However, our study is unlike the study by others in which activities of these antioxidant enzymes were not determined after treatment with fruit extracts in HEK-293 cells. Further evaluation of the Thai fruit extracts-induced antioxidant enzyme activity in HEK-293 cells is required.

There are two categories of antioxidative defenses that prevent radical formation, repair oxidative damage, remove radicals before damage can occur, eliminate damaged molecules, and prevent mutations. These two categories are antioxidant enzymes and nonenzymatic antioxidant compounds [35]. SOD, catalase, and GPx are enzymes that destroy the peroxides and play a significant role in providing antioxidant defenses to an organism. GPx and catalase are involved in the elimination of H₂O₂. SOD acts by dismutating superoxide radical to H₂O₂, which is then acted upon by GPx (Figure 7). The functions of all three enzymes are interconnected and their insufficient activities result in the accumulation of ROS production and increased oxidative stress in the cells.

The previous study suggested that treatment with the aqueous extract of A. bilimbi can partially reduce the imbalance between the ROS generation and the scavenging enzyme activity in diabetic animals exposed to oxidative stress [33]. Consistent with this previous study, we demonstrated that A. bilimbi extract is able to inhibit H₂O₂-induced ROS production in HEK-293 cells by inducing the synthesis of antioxidant enzymes such as Mn-SOD and GPx-1. According to this previous study and our present data, A. bilimbi could be a supplement, as an antioxidant therapy, and may be beneficial for correcting the ROS production and preventing oxidative stress due to lipid peroxidation and free radicals.

It has been reported that mango peel extract contains several valuable compounds such as polyphenols, carotenoids, terpenoids, sterols, fatty acids, and dietary fiber [12]. The major components such as mangiferin, amentoflavone, friedelin, daucosterol, and beta-sitosterol have been already identified [36]. The peel extract of M. indica exhibited high antioxidant capacity by effectively scavenging various free radical such as DPPH, hydroxyl, and peroxyl radicals [12]. In addition, treatment with aqueous extract of M. indica inhibited lipofundin-induced oxidative stress in rats [23]. This antioxidant effect is derived from the increasing activities of SOD and catalase [23]. We also showed in this study that M. indica extract has an antioxidant activity in vitro and in HEK-239 cells. This extract induced the mRNA and protein expressions of Mn-SOD, GPx-1, and catalase in HEK-293 cells. Thus, the active compounds in mango extract might exert the protective effects through stimulating oxidative defense system in the cells.

Malpighia glabra (Escobillo) is well known as an excellent dietary source of vitamin C and many phytochemicals such as polyphenols, anthocyanin, carotenoids, and tannins [37]. Interestingly, the phytochemical estimation in ten Indian fruits revealed that M. glabra has the highest phenolic content in methanol extract ( mg GAE/100 g FW) [37]. Our data are consistent with this previous study showing that, among 11 fruits, the highest phenolic content was found in M. glabra ( mg GAE/100 g FW). The difference in phenolic content may be due to the variation in the state of maturity, genotype, and climatic factors. Previous study reported that aqueous extract of M. glabra has a potent antioxidant activity determined by DPPH scavenging test [38]. In addition, our present study reported that treatment with extract from M. glabra attenuated H₂O₂-induced ROS production in HEK-293 cells, confirming that the fruits of M. glabra are rich in antioxidants especially polyphenols. The study from Singh and his colleagues showed the positive correlation for antioxidant capacity with phenolic compounds (R² = 0.845) [37]. We also reported the strong correlation between antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in Thai fruits including M. glabra. In addition, we found that the methanol extract of M. glabra exhibited the antioxidant effect in HEK-293 cells by increasing mRNA and protein expressions of Mn-SOD and catalase. Hence, the fruits of M. glabra could be a good resource of phytochemicals with high antioxidant activity. However, further studies on the identification and isolation of individual active compounds are required.

A. ghaesembilla is an indigenous species found in Thailand. A few observations demonstrated that the extract of A. ghaesembilla has antioxidant activity. For instance, A. ghaesembilla was analyzed for their total antioxidant capacity through in vitro radical-scavenging assays such as DPPH and FRAP assays and antioxidant enzyme activity assay [32]. This previous study reported that extract from A. ghaesembilla has the highest DPPH (1,020.6 AEAC mg/100 g dry wt.) and FRAP values (2,114 μM AEAC/g dry wt.). In addition, A. ghaesembilla can activate the enzymatic activities of SOD, catalase, and peroxidase [32]. In the present study, we reported that the extract of A. ghaesembilla at the concentration of 1 mg/ml exhibited moderate DPPH free radical-scavenging activity with % of inhibition, which related to the total phenolic content ( mg GAE/100 g FW). Moreover, the extract of A. ghaesembilla showed an antioxidant effect in HEK-293 cells by stimulating the synthesis of GPx-1 and catalase. Interestingly, administration of crude extract (dose 400–1,000 mg/kg body weight) from A. ghaesembilla for 21 days in diabetic rats resulted in a decrease of blood glucose level [39]. As regards antioxidant and hypoglycemic actions, A. ghaesembilla can be served as a good source of natural supplement.

The juice of Z. mauritiana has moderate total phenolic content ( μg GAE/g sample) while juice of S. malaccense has low total phenolic content ( μg GAE/g sample) [29]. Consistent with this previous study, we reported that fruit extract of Z. jujuba exhibited higher phenolic content than S. malaccense ( versus mg GAE/100 g FW). The juice of Z. mauritiana and S. malaccense exhibited the great DPPH scavenging activity (460.58 ± 17.93 and 137.11 ± 2.07 μg VCEAC/g sample, resp.) [29]. In addition, our study showed that the methanol extracts of Z. jujuba and S. malaccense fruits also exhibited the DPPH scavenging activity. Moreover, these two fruits attenuated H₂O₂-induced ROS production and increased the synthesis of GPx-1 and catalase in HEK-293 cells. The antioxidant activity of Z. mauritiana might be contributed by p-hydroxybenzoic acid that was reported to be the most abundant phenolic compound in the fruit extract [40].

The juice of S. koetjape has high total phenolic content ( μg GAE/g sample) [29]. In addition, we reported that higher phenolic content was also detected in crude methanol extract of S. koetjape ( mg GAE/100 g FW). The antioxidant activities of S. koetjape could be associated with its high total phenolic content. The juice of S. koetjape exhibited the great DPPH scavenging activity (418.22 ± 5.17 μg VCEAC/g sample) [29]. Consistent with this previous study, we found that methanol extract of S. koetjape showed a high DPPH scavenging activity (Table 1). Moreover, S. koetjape extract elicited the antioxidant activity in HEK-293 cells by attenuating H₂O₂-induced ROS production. Our present study demonstrated that the antioxidant activity of S. koetjape extract derived from the induction of mRNA and protein expression of GPx-1 in HEK-293 cells.

It has been reported that administration of phenolic acids (i.e., gentisic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, and p-coumaric acid) at a dosage of 100 mg/kg for 14 consecutive days in rats enhanced the mRNA expression of hepatic CuZn-SOD, GPx, and catalase [10]. Moreover, these phenolic acids also stimulated the enzyme activities. In the present study, we demonstrated that Thai fruits that have high phenolic contents showed the antioxidant effects by increasing the synthesis of Mn-SOD, GPx-1, and catalase in HEK-293 cells. Thus, polyphenolics found in fruits might exert the antioxidant effect through stimulating synthesis of these antioxidant enzymes. Although it is possible that phenolic acids contained in Thai fruits are involved in the regulation of antioxidant enzyme synthesis, further study is required to determine the active compounds necessary for antioxidant actions of Thai fruits in HEK-293 cells.

5. Conclusion

We have identified a new mechanism for fruit extracts mediating the inhibition of oxidative stress in HEK-293 cells. Thai fruits provide an antioxidation, which enhances the mRNA and protein expressions of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, GPx-1, and Mn-SOD (Figure 7). Our results provide a better understanding of the antioxidant effects of Thai fruits on antioxidant enzyme production in the cells as well as information regarding the intake of fruits for human health.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Natthinee Anantachoke performed the experiments and data analysis and wrote the manuscript; Pattamapan Lomarat performed the experiments and data analysis and wrote the manuscript; Wasin Praserttirachai performed the experiments; Ruksinee Khammanit performed the experiments and data analysis; Supachoke Mangmool carried out the experiments and data analysis, participated in the study planning, and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund Grant RDG5720041 (Supachoke Mangmool). The authors are grateful to Professor Wongsatit Chuakul for identification of the fruits.

References

I. M. Fearon and S. P. Faux, “Oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease: novel tools give (free) radical insight,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 372–381, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Guo, L. Sun, X. P. Chen, and D. S. Zhang, “Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 2003–2014, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Niedowicz and D. L. Daleke, “The role of oxidative stress in diabetic complications,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 289–330, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Fridovich, “Superoxide anion radical ( $O {\bar{∙}}_{2}$ ), superoxide dismutases, and related matters,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 30, pp. 18515–18517, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Halliwell, “Antioxidant defence mechanisms: from the beginning to the end (of the beginning),” Free Radical Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 261–272, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Maiorino, R. Brigelius-Flohé, K. D. Aumann, A. Roveri, D. Schomburg, and L. Flohé, “Diversity of glutathione peroxidases,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 252, pp. 38–53, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Araujo, M. Zhang, and F. Yin, “Heme oxygenase-1, oxidation, inflammation, and atherosclerosis,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 3, article 119, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Boeing, A. Bechthold, A. Bub et al., “Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 637–663, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, Q. Luo, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2157–2184, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-T. Yeh and G.-C. Yen, “Induction of hepatic antioxidant enzymes by phenolic acids in rats is accompanied by increased levels of multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 mRNA expression,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhang, A. S. Ravipati, S. R. Koyyalamudi et al., “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of selected medicinal plants containing phenolic and flavonoid compounds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 23, pp. 12361–12367, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Ajila, K. A. Naidu, S. G. Bhat, and U. J. S. P. Rao, “Bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of mango peel extract,” Food Chemistry, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 982–988, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fu, B.-T. Xu, X.-R. Xu et al., “Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of 62 fruits,” Food Chemistry, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 345–350, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, Y.-F. Chu, X. Wu, and R. H. Liu, “Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 25, pp. 7449–7454, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fu, B.-T. Xu, X.-R. Xu, X.-S. Qin, R.-Y. Gan, and H.-B. Li, “Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of 56 wild fruits from South China,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 8602–8617, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Vongsak, P. Sithisarn, S. Mangmool, S. Thongpraditchote, Y. Wongkrajang, and W. Gritsanapan, “Maximizing total phenolics, total flavonoids contents and antioxidant activity of Moringa oleifera leaf extract by the appropriate extraction method,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 44, pp. 566–571, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Herald, P. Gadgil, and M. Tilley, “High-throughput micro plate assays for screening flavonoid content and DPPH-scavenging activity in sorghum bran and flour,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 2326–2331, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Parichatikanond, D. Pinthong, and S. Mangmool, “Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with delphinidin, cyanin, and quercetin,” Planta Medica, vol. 78, no. 15, pp. 1626–1632, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chittasupho, M. Jaturanpinyo, and S. Mangmool, “Pectin nanoparticle enhances cytotoxicity of methotrexate against hepG2 cells,” Drug Delivery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mangmool, P. Hemplueksa, W. Parichatikanond, and N. Chattipakorn, “Epac is required for GLP-1R-mediated inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 583–596, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Vongsak, S. Mangmool, and W. Gritsanapan, “Antioxidant activity and induction of mRNA expressions of antioxidant enzymes in HEK-293 cells of Moringa oleifera leaf extract,” Planta Medica, vol. 81, no. 12-13, pp. 1084–1089, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Thamizhselvam, I. V. Liji, Y. R. Sanjayakumar, C. G. Sanal Gopi, K. G. Vasantha Kumar, and G. K. Swamy, “Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Averrhoa bilimbi Linn. fruit juice in paracetamol intoxicated Wistar Albino rats,” Enliven: Toxicology and Allied Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
L. D. Roche and A. F. Perez, “Protective effects of Mangifera indica L. extract against lipofundin-induced oxidative stress in rats,” Pharmaceutical Crops, vol. 3, pp. 94–98, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, S.-K. Li, R.-Y. Gan, F.-L. Song, L. Kuang, and H.-B. Li, “Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of infusions from 223 medicinal plants,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 51, pp. 289–298, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lako, V. C. Trenerry, M. Wahlqvist, N. Wattanapenpaiboon, S. Sotheeswaran, and R. Premier, “Phytochemical flavonols, carotenoids and the antioxidant properties of a wide selection of Fijian fruit, vegetables and other readily available foods,” Food Chemistry, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1727–1741, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Lim, S. Mat Junit, M. A. Abdulla, and A. Abdul Aziz, “In vivo biochemical and gene expression analyses of the antioxidant activities and hypocholesterolaemic properties of Tamarindus indica fruit pulp extract,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e70058, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. D. S. Pereira, A. P. Dionísio, N. J. Wurlitzer et al., “Effect of antioxidant potential of tropical fruit juices on antioxidant enzyme profiles and lipid peroxidation in rats,” Food Chemistry, vol. 157, pp. 179–185, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Liu, X. Q. Li, C. Weber, C. Y. Lee, J. Brown, and R. H. Liu, “Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of raspberries,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2926–2930, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Sulaiman and K. L. Ooi, “Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of 40 tropical juices from malaysia and identification of phenolics from the bioactive fruit juices of Barringtonia racemosa and Phyllanthus acidus,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 39, pp. 9576–9585, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yao, W. Sang, M. Zhou, and G. Ren, “Phenolic composition and antioxidant activities of 11 celery cultivars,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. C9–C13, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Noor Asna and A. Noriham, “Antioxidant activity and bioactive components of oxalidaceae fruit extracts,” Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116–126, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
U. C. Basak, A. K. Mahapatra, and S. Mishra, “Assessment of protective antioxidant mechanisms in some ethno-medicinally important wild Edible fruits of Odisha, India,” Agrotechnololgy, vol. 2, article 116, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Kurup and S. Mini, “Attenuation of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by aqueous extract of Averrhoa bilimbi LINN fruits,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 4981–4988, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Singh, J. Sharma, and P. K. Goyal, “Prophylactic role of Averrhoa carambola (Star Fruit) extract against chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma in Swiss albino mice,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2014, Article ID 158936, 8 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Lobo, A. Patil, A. Phatak, and N. Chandra, “Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health,” Pharmacognosy Reviews, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 118–126, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. A. Jahurul, I. S. M. Zaidul, K. Ghafoor et al., “Mango (Mangifera indica L.) by-products and their valuable components: a review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 183, pp. 173–180, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Singh, S. Singh, K. M. Salim, and R. C. Srivastava, “Estimation of phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of underutilized fruits of Andaman Islands (India),” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 446–452, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, F. Li, C. He, Y. Dong, and Q. Wang, “Antioxidant activity and melanogenesis inhibitory effect of acerola fruit (Malpighia glabra L.) aqueous extract and its safe use in cosmetics,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 957–960, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Gargantiel and M. C. Ysrael, “Antioxiant activity and hypoglycemic potential of Antidesma ghaesembilla Gaertn (Phyllantaceae),” International Journal Science and Technology Research, vol. 3, pp. 422–431, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Muchuweti, G. Zenda, A. R. Ndhlala, and A. Kasiyamhuru, “Sugars, organic acid and phenolic compounds of Ziziphus mauritiana fruit,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 221, no. 3-4, pp. 570–574, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Natthinee Anantachoke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3617

Downloads

1575

Citations

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Thai Fruits Exhibit Antioxidant Activity and Induction of Antioxidant Enzymes in HEK-293 Cells

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

2.2. Plant Materials

2.3. Preparation of Extracts

2.4. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

2.6. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Assay

2.7. Cell Culture

2.8. MTT Assay

2.9. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Level

2.10. mRNA Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR

2.11. Western Blotting

2.12. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Yields of Thai Fruit Extracts

3.2. Determination of Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents of Thai Fruit Extracts

3.3. DPPH Scavenging Activities of Thai Fruit Extracts

3.4. Correlation between Antioxidant Capacity and Total Phenolic Content

3.5. Thai Fruit Extract Inhibits H2O2-Induced Intracellular ROS Production in HEK-293 Cells

3.6. Induction of mRNA Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes by Thai Fruit Extracts

3.7. Thai Fruit Extracts Increased Protein Level of Antioxidant Enzymes

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Competing Interests

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

3.5. Thai Fruit Extract Inhibits H₂O₂-Induced Intracellular ROS Production in HEK-293 Cells