Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9282813, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9282813
Review Article

Chinese Herbs Interfering with Cancer Reprogramming Metabolism

1Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macau
2Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
3School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
4Division of Reproductive Science in Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Received 6 December 2015; Accepted 3 February 2016

Academic Editor: Kuang C. Lai

Copyright © 2016 Zhangfeng Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Emerging evidence promotes a reassessment of metabolic reprogramming regulation in cancer research. Although there exists a long history of Chinese herbs applied in cancer treatment, few reports have addressed the effects of Chinese herbal components on metabolic reprogramming, which is a central cancer hallmark involved in the slowing or prevention of chemoresistance in cancer cells. In this review, we have focused on four core elements altered by metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. These include glucose transport, glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and fatty acid synthesis. With this focus, we have summarized recent advances in metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells in response to specific Chinese herbal components. We propose that exploring Chinese herbal interference in cancer metabolic reprogramming might identify new therapeutic targets for cancer and more ways in which to approach metabolism-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Since the 1920s, cancer cell metabolism has been studied in the context of the so-called Warburg effect. This metabolic feature of neoplastic cells involves many complex biochemical reactions and multiple interrelated signaling pathways, which have yet to be fully elucidated. The Warburg effect is an ubiquitous event in the malignant proliferation of cancer cells, distinguishing them from normal cells, and recently a growing number of novel findings promoted a reassessment of metabolic reprogramming regulation in cancer research [1]. For example, recent work suggests that the Warburg effect regulates chemosensitivity in Taxol-resistant human breast cancer cells [2]. Other studies have shown that it influences estrogen-related receptor expression [3]. In autophagy-senescent fibroblasts that promote the growth and metastasis of human breast cancer cells, the Warburg effect participates in the crosstalk between fibroblasts and cancer cells. The precise relationship between the two cell types is governed by mitochondrial metabolism [4].

Many reviews and research studies show that systemic metabolic disorders intersect with cancer development, and metabolomics profiling for prognostic and predictive markers has identified shared markers associated with both conditions [59]. Recent work with several tumor types has documented the synergistic effect of combining 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and berberine, two tumor cell-toxic compounds, to target glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) simultaneously [10]. In nuclear magnetic resonance- (NMR-) based metabonomics research, significant differences for prognosis have been documented for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with “favorable” vis-à-vis “intermediate” statuses in the cytogenetic determinants governing glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and fatty acid synthesis [11].

The metabolic phenotype of cancer cells provides a great deal of valuable information about treatment design and prognosis. This information overrides genetic and individual diversity as well as pathologic diversity of specific cancer cell types. For example, in human colorectal cancer, the presence or absence of significantly altered metabolites correlates with recurrence and survival rates after surgery and chemotherapy [12].

Large numbers of studies identifying these correlative effects suggest that exogenous metabolic regulation has good therapeutic potential for cancer treatment. Across many published studies, this has been shown to be particularly true when related to targeting the uptake and the utilization of glucose, the abnormally enhanced glycolysis, altered mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and deregulated fatty acid synthesis. Meanwhile, other reprogramming events have been shown to occur in parallel with the ones identified above, including altered glycine consumption and activated mitochondrial glycine biosynthetic pathway [13]. Finally, many studies have focused on the systems biology and metabolic transformation of cancer cells, where the key enzymes in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathways (PPP) were investigated as correlated metabolic changes occurring within the context of the Warburg effect [14].

In Chinese medicine, treatment strategies have emphasized promoting blood circulation, supporting health and energy while strengthening body resistance, heat clearance, and systemic detoxification, resolving phlegm production, promoting T cell cytotoxic functions, dispersing edema, and relieving pain. In addition, many natural products derived from Chinese herbs have been shown to have therapeutic potential toward the prevention of cancer initiation and progression [12, 15]. One example is the Chinese botanical agent berberine, which inhibits mitochondrial complex I and interacts with the adenine nucleotide translocator in cancer cells [16]. The powdered fruiting bodies of Pleurotus eryngii (DC. ex Fr.) Quel have been shown to significantly inhibit the proliferation of several cancer cell lines (A549, BGC-823, HepG2, and HGC-27) and to have immunopotentiation activity in RAW 264.7 cells [17]. 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose, which is a polyphenolic compound isolated from Rhus chinensis Mill, regulates a series of metabolic genes in glycolysis, pyruvate metabolism, gluconeogenesis, and tyrosine metabolism in the breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231 [18]. These compounds are isolated examples of an extended body of work, with biochemical agents that have been used in China for up to 3,000 years that recently have shown targeted inhibition of cancer metabolic reprogramming, by which tumor initiation, progression, and spread might be addressed.

In this review, we have focused on glucose, glycolysis, mitochondrial OXPHOS, and fatty acid synthesis and have identified recent successful studies using Chinese herbs that target and inhibit cancer cell growth.

2. Glucose Transport

Abnormal glucose metabolism is closely linked with cancer cell metabolism. In normal cells, glucose uptake sustains the two main metabolic processes that produce ATP as an end product, which are glycolysis and mitochondrial OXPHOS [1924]. There have been few studies on glucose uptake by cancer cells; instead, the vast majority of work has focused on the activity of glucose transporters (GLUTs). In recent years, another family of glucose transporters, called sodium-dependent glucose transporters (SGLTs), was studied for their observed ability to slow tumor cell growth. Some components derived from Chinese herbs exert direct GLUT inhibition. Notably, GLUT expression is significantly different in cancer cells, in relation to their normal counterparts. This property of cancer cells makes them vulnerable to GLUT inhibitors, which reduce glucose consumption [2528]. Tetrandrine, a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid isolated from Stephania tetrandra S Moore, reduces glucose uptake in cancer cells, and this energetic impairment induces apoptosis [29]. Finally, chlorogenic acid, a phenolic secondary metabolite isolated from many Chinese herbs (Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. and Lonicera japonica Thunb. among others), has significant effects on glucose transport in cancer cells, through activating the AMPK signaling pathway [30].

3. Glycolysis

Cancer cells require high levels of glycolytic intermediates to support their biosynthetic requirements [64]. Many promising anticancer agents, currently under study, are compounds that inhibit aerobic glycolysis [6567]. Some of these agents also target autophagy in cancer cells, suggesting that they might be used for combinatorial therapies [68].

Some bioactive compounds derived from Chinese herbs are now known to regulate glycolysis [67]. For example, prosapogenin A, isolated from Veratrum, regulates the expression of glycolysis-related genes to induce apoptosis in human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), and breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells [45]. Other Chinese herbal components target different glycolytic intermediates.

Epigallocatechin, for example, is one component derived from the Chinese herb Spatholobus suberectus that targets glycolytic lactate production by inhibiting the expression or activity of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A), an important enzyme checkpoint in glycolysis that catalyzes the interconversion of pyruvate and L-lactate. Its activity has been shown to induce apoptosis and suppress breast cancer growth in vivo, as upregulated LDH-A facilitates glycolysis and reduces tumor dependency on oxygen [69]. LDH-A promotes tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis, and it is a prognostic factor for poor survival [70]. Inhibiting LDH-A activity significantly reduces cell proliferation and tumor size, and it induces elevated intracellular oxidative stress, resulting in apoptosis. Silencing LDH-A also contributes to suppressing tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells [71]. There is also evidence that the LDH-B isozyme also participates in tumor development and is regulated by oncogenic transcription factors mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [72].

Oleanolic acid, another Chinese herbal derivative, suppresses aerobic glycolysis via the PK-M2/PK-M1 switch that accompanies mTOR/c-Myc/heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) signaling regulation [39]. Pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 (PK-M2), like LDH-A, is a critical enzyme in glycolysis, and its underlying mechanisms have been also explored extensively in the context of tumor cell physiology [39, 73]. In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, targeting PK-M2 shows therapeutic potential, as it regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and migration [74]. Of interest, PK-M2 activity is augmented by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α- (HIF-1α-) mediated transcription activation in mTOR-hyperactive cancer cells [75].

Finally, neoalbaconol, an isolate of the fruiting body of Albatrellus confluens, induces energy depletion in cancer cells by inhibiting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/HK2 pathway and reduces glucose consumption and ATP generation [38]. Hexokinase 2 (HK2) is also a key metabolic regulator implied in many tumor types.

4. Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS)

Mitochondrial OXPHOS is abnormal in cancer cells, and many studies suggest that it may underlie tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis of cancer cells. However, until recently it has been unclear (1) whether these abnormalities are the results of mitochondrial dysfunction and (2) whether mitochondrial functional suppression would inhibit tumor cell growth [7679]. Many current studies use natural origin derivatives to target mitochondrial OXPHOS in tumors and to study the exerted synergistic effects these compounds have in the presence of other chemotherapeutic agents [80]. For example, berberine, as mentioned previously, synergistically enhances the suppression of cancer cell proliferation through ATP depletion, when it is combined with 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) [10].

Other natural origin derivatives may act alone or use other mechanisms to achieve similar outcomes. Chrysophanol, an anthraquinone derivative, induces necrotic tumor cell death in Hep3B hepatoma cells by decreasing ATP levels [32]. Shikonin, a major bioactive component isolated from Lithospermum erythrorhizon, induces apoptosis through reactive oxygen species (ROS) deregulation and OXPHOS uncoupling [48]. Of interest, shikonin seems to accumulate preferentially in the mitochondria, and its induction of ROS species results in the collapse intracellular redox balance [49]. A botanical extract obtained from the leaves of the tropical Papaya plant Carica papaya exerts a significant cytotoxic effect on hypoxic cancer cells, by way of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibition [81]. HIF transcription factors regulate glucose and lipid metabolism, by mediating the switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (HIF-1) and coordinating β-oxidation of fatty acids to maintain cell survival (HIF-2) [82]. More importantly, they regulate cell response to hypoxic environments and adapt cancer cell metabolism to promote cell survival when faced with the unreliable oxygen supply of the tumor microenvironment. HIF has become an attractive target for cancer therapy as HIF regulation is correlated with glucose metabolism and cell survival in many cancer cells, including HepG2 hepatoma cells [81, 8385]. Finally, vitamin C is cytotoxic in HIF-positive cancer cells, as HIF inhibition by Carica papaya extract contributes synergistically in these cells with vitamin C to reduce ATP regeneration [86].

5. Fatty Acid Synthesis

Because they depend upon glycolysis for energy, cancer cells generally contain more glycolytic metabolites than their normal cell counterparts. This surfeit of nucleotide and protein precursors combined with lipids produced in fatty acid synthesis act to promote tumor initiation, proliferation, and spread [87]. Fatty acid synthesis provides macromolecule support for tumor cell proliferation and is activated above control cell levels in many tumor types [88, 89]. Many components of Chinese herbs have fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitory activity [90, 91]. In the human hepatoma cell line HepG2, botanical compound quercetin induces apoptosis through inhibiting the activity and expression of intracellular FASN [46]. Osthole, isolated from Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson, inhibits FASN, and by this activity it induces apoptosis in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HER2-) overexpressing breast cells [44]. Oridonin, a diterpenoid isolated from Rabdosia rubescens, exerts antitumor effects by inhibiting fatty acid synthesis in two human colorectal cancer cell lines, SW480 and SW620 [42].

The studies cited above are selected from a large number of recent reports which identify FASN inhibitors, from Chinese herbal components, as being effective agents for metabolic conditions that do not target the propagation of neoplasia directly, but through their ability to promote blood circulation, prevent blood stasis and pathological coagulation, support systemic energy demands, and strengthen resistance to microbes and clear toxic materials [92].

6. Discussion

6.1. Chinese Herbs Interfere with Cancer Cell Metabolism through Many Pathways and Targets

We have shown previously that berberine, an alkaloid isolated from Chinese herbs, interferes with cancer cell metabolism through many different pathways and targets, including but not limited to glycolysis (PKM2, PFKP) and fatty acid synthesis (ACC, ACL) [31, 93, 94]. Other herbal derivatives also interfere with cancer cell metabolism in different ways, and their activities are summarized in Table 1. When compared to conventional approaches (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapeutic drug agents), agents like berberine are more tolerable and less toxic than these listed procedures whose use is the standard of care for cancer in Western medicine. Recent studies of Chinese medicine-affiliated compounds, examined through the lens of modern medical practices, have shown that they are sustainable and progressive modes of antitumor activity. These findings should be interpreted against a large body of data (centuries of use of these agents) showing that their systemic cytotoxicity is low or absent [15].

Table 1: Bioactive compounds isolated from Chinese herbs interfere with cancer metabolic reprogramming.

Worldwide interest in Chinese herbs has been reawakened in light of the realization that metabolic reprogramming is central to the biology and survival of cancer cells. Metabolic reprogramming is adaptive for tumor cells, but in a limited context: its requirements must be met or tumor cells become susceptible to intracellular or host-cytotoxic mechanisms that can kill them. This identifies a large new set of potential therapeutic targets in tumor cells, and many of these targets are specifically affected by Chinese herbal components. The aforementioned aspects of glycolytic inhibition can be addressed individually for cancer treatment. However, unilateral regulation of OXPHOS or glycolysis through inhibition alone might not completely address the complex energy status changes that must be sustained in cancer cells [95]. Instead, whole-network interference, a concept to be explored in future systems biology studies, is likely to be much more effective.

We propose here that Chinese herbs and herbal components with documented antitumor activity may fill this deficiency, in that many of these agents address multiple targets in the glycolytic “Achilles heel” (e.g., the Warburg effect).

6.2. Perturbation of Cancer Metabolism with Chinese Herbs Disrupts Neoplastic Homeostasis

A consensus hypothesis regarding antitumor Chinese herbs is that perturbation of cancer metabolic reprogramming (the reduction of available metabolic energy for the cells) essentially amounts to a major disruption of a metabolic state that has been transformed, by the neoplastic process, into a new kind of homeostasis, which maintains cancer cell viability and proliferation. In the studies cited above, a common aspect of Chinese herbal component antitumor effects is their ability to break down glycolytic reprogramming in cancer cells, thereby exposing them to toxic agents and mechanisms that otherwise would be ineffective. This idea has support from many studies; for example, melanoma cells can be reprogrammed, by PB transposons, to return to differentiation, normal proliferation, and low metastatic potential [96].

In addition to their ability to disrupt glycolytic metabolism in cancer cells, Chinese herbs restore a normal homeostatic state, both in cells and systemically, and together these effects promote health and recovery in cancer-affected individuals. Finally, as noted above, thousands of years of experience support safe application in the clinic. Therefore, what we will now call “perturbation regulation” (restoration of the new metabolic homeostasis established by neoplastic transformation) by Chinese herbs is reasonable and forward-looking [15, 92, 97]. Although the exact metabolic regulatory pathways and the definite mechanisms addressed by many of these agents are yet unknown, it is now time to fill these information gaps.

6.3. Chinese Herbs and Herbal Derivatives Are Promising Therapeutics for Cancer and Other Metabolism-Related Diseases

Targeting glycolytic tumor reprogramming may be useful in combination with current treatments of cancer, for example, chemotherapy, by making lower doses of toxic agents more effective. Another promising use for Chinese herbs would be in metabolic syndrome disorders, including diabetes, wherein their ability to perturb pathological homeostatic mechanisms (by perturbation, returning to normal intracellular and systemic metabolism) would offer a gentle and effective treatment protocol for these diseases, whose basic pathophysiology involves harmful metabolic reprogramming that cannot be disrupted by current treatment regimens.

7. Conclusion

In this review, we propose that Chinese herbs and herbal components with identified antitumor efficacy should be studied in detail, toward the identification of multiple new targets and pathways that are expressed in “neoplastic homeostasis.” We have summarized several of the core changes that occur in metabolically reprogrammed cells and used these to illustrate where recent and older work have already given us a new direction (perturbation of the aforementioned neoplastic homeostasis). This new direction provides a novel context for the identification of targets and pathways that expose tumor cells to the toxicity of Chinese herbs. As noted above, many compounds derived from Chinese herbs are known to have potent metabolic regulatory potential, as indicated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Cancer metabolic reprogramming and Chinese herbal interference. Metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells has four core elements: glucose transport, glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and fatty acid synthesis. Fourteen derivative compounds of Chinese herbs have been shown to interfere with the complex and interrelated biochemical reactions that result in cancer cells achieving that metabolically reprogrammed dysfunctional energy homeostasis. While some of the mechanisms behind the antitumor activity of these chemical agents are known, these compounds have potent metabolic regulatory potential that has yet to be tapped. Herbal derivative abbreviations: BER: berberine; CUR: curcumin; Rg3: ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3; OLA: oleanolic acid; ORD: oridonin; OST: osthole; PRA: prosapogenin A; QCT: quercetin; SHK: shikonin; TET: tetrandrine; WGN: wogonin; EGCG: epigallocatechin gallate; ORX: oroxylin A; CHRY: Chrysophanol.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Mr. Zhangfeng Zhong and Mr. William W. Qiang prepared the paper for final submission, and Dr. Wen Tan participated in the early drafting process. Mr. Haotian Zhang and Mr. Shengpeng Wang revised the paper and provided valuable feedback. Professor Yitao Wang, Dr. Chunming Wang and Dr. Wenan Qiang conceived the paper, and Dr. Wenan Qiang organized the paper revision process for final submission. All authors read and approved the paper. Zhangfeng Zhong, William W. Qiang, and Wen Tan contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Macao Science and Technology Development Fund (077/2011/A3 and 048/2013/A2), the research Fund of University of Macau (UL016/09Y4/CMS/WYT01/ICMS and MYRG208 (Y3-L4)-ICMS11-WYT), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2014-148). Wenan Qiang was supported by the Baskes Foundation and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Northwestern University. The authors thank Dr. Virginia Scofield from the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, for her critical suggestions and her proofreading of the paper. We also thank Stacy Ann Kujawa at Northwestern University for her proofreading of the paper.

References

  1. I. Nakano, “Therapeutic potential of targeting glucose metabolism in glioma stem cells,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1233–1236, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Zhou, Y. Zhao, Y. Ding et al., “Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes Taxol-resistant cancer cells to Taxol,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 33, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Q. Cai, T. Lin, S. Kamarajugadda, and J. Lu, “Regulation of glycolysis and the Warburg effect by estrogen-related receptors,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 16, pp. 2079–2086, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Capparelli, C. Guido, D. Whitaker-Menezes et al., “Autophagy and senescence in cancer-associated fibroblasts metabolically supports tumor growth and metastasis, via glycolysis and ketone production,” Cell Cycle, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2285–2302, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Yu, J. Shen, T. T. Sun, X. Zhang, and N. Wong, “Obesity, insulin resistance, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 483–491, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Guo, X. Wang, L. Qiu et al., “Probing gender-specific lipid metabolites and diagnostic biomarkers for lung cancer using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 414, pp. 135–141, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Shen, Y. Chen, J. Sun et al., “Time-course changes in potential biomarkers detected using a metabonomic approach in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1953–1961, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Yu et al., “The association between metabolic abnormality and endometrial cancer: a large case-control study in China,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A.-H. Zhang, H. Sun, S. Qiu, and X.-J. Wang, “Metabolomics in noninvasive breast cancer,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 424, pp. 3–7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L.-X. Fan, C.-M. Liu, A.-H. Gao, Y.-B. Zhou, and J. Li, “Berberine combined with 2-deoxy-d-glucose synergistically enhances cancer cell proliferation inhibition via energy depletion and unfolded protein response disruption,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1830, no. 11, pp. 5175–5183, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Wang, L. Zhang, W.-L. Chen et al., “Rapid diagnosis and prognosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia by serum metabonomic analysis,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 4393–4401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y.-C. Li, S.-M. He, Z.-X. He et al., “Plumbagin induces apoptotic and autophagic cell death through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 344, no. 2, pp. 239–259, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Jain, R. Nilsson, S. Sharma et al., “Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation,” Science, vol. 336, no. 6084, pp. 1040–1044, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. P. Drabovich, M. P. Pavlou, A. Dimitromanolakis, and E. P. Diamandis, “Quantitative analysis of energy metabolic pathways in MCF-7 breast cancer cells by selected reaction monitoring assay,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 422–434, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. L. W. Hsiao and L. Liu, “The role of traditional Chinese herbal medicines in cancer therapy—from TCM theory to mechanistic insights,” Planta Medica, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1118–1131, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. V. Diogo, N. G. Machado, I. A. Barbosa, T. L. Serafim, A. Burgeiro, and P. J. Oliveira, “Berberine as a promising safe anti-cancer agent—is there a role for mitochondria?” Current Drug Targets, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 850–859, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Mariga, F. Pei, W.-J. Yang et al., “Immunopotentiation of Pleurotus eryngii (DC. ex Fr.) Quel,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 604–614, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. S. Yu, S.-J. Jeong, J.-H. Kim et al., “The genome-wide expression profile of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose-treated MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells: molecular target on cancer metabolism,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. E. Elf and J. Chen, “Targeting glucose metabolism in patients with cancer,” Cancer, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 774–780, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. O. Nam, F. Yotsumoto, K. Miyata, N. Shirasu, S. Miyamoto, and M. Kuroki, “Possible therapeutic targets among the molecules involved in the warburg effect in tumor cells,” Anticancer Research, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 2855–2860, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Annibaldi and C. Widmann, “Glucose metabolism in cancer cells,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 466–470, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. K. Reyes, T. Motiwala, and S. T. Jacob, “Regulation of glucose metabolism in hepatocarcinogenesis by microRNAs,” Gene Expression, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 85–92, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. B. Hamanaka and N. S. Chandel, “Targeting glucose metabolism for cancer therapy,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 211–215, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Madan, R. Gogna, M. Bhatt, U. Pati, P. Kuppusamy, and A. A. Mahdi, “Regulation of glucose metabolism by p53: emerging new roles for the tumor suppressor,” Oncotarget, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 948–957, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y.-Z. Li, S.-L. Li, X. Li et al., “Expression of endogenous hypoxia markers in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3675–3680, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Szablewski, “Expression of glucose transporters in cancers,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1835, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Adekola, S. T. Rosen, and M. Shanmugam, “Glucose transporters in cancer metabolism,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 650–654, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Nualart, M. Los Angeles Garcia, R. A. Medina, and G. I. Owen, “Glucose transporters in sex steroid hormone related cancer,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 534–548, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. Qiu, M. Su, F. Xie et al., “Tetrandrine blocks autophagic flux and induces apoptosis via energetic impairment in cancer cells,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID e1123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Meng, J. Cao, Q. Feng, J. Peng, and Y. Hu, “Roles of chlorogenic acid on regulating glucose and lipids metabolism: a review,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 801457, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Tan, N. Li, R. Tan et al., “Berberine interfered with breast cancer cells metabolism, balancing energy homeostasis,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C.-H. Ni, P.-Y. Chen, H.-F. Lu et al., “Chrysophanol-induced necrotic-like cell death through an impaired mitochondrial ATP synthesis in Hep3B human liver cancer cells,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 887–895, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C.-C. Lu, J.-S. Yang, A.-C. Huang et al., “Chrysophanol induces necrosis through the production of ROS and alteration of ATP levels in J5 human liver cancer cells,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 967–976, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. J. Zhang, H. S. Zhang, Y. Liu, and Y. H. Huang, “Curcumin inhibits Ec109 cell growth via an AMPK-mediated metabolic switch,” Life Sciences, vol. 134, pp. 49–55, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. Wang, H. Fan, Q. Chen et al., “Curcumin inhibits aerobic glycolysis and induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis through hexokinase II in human colorectal cancer cells in vitro,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Fan, W. Tian, and X. Ma, “Curcumin induces apoptosis of HepG2 cells via inhibiting fatty acid synthase,” Targeted Oncology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Li, T. Liu, L. Zhao et al., “Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 inhibits the Warburg effect through STAT3 pathways in ovarian cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 775–781, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Q. Deng, X. Yu, L. Xiao et al., “Neoalbaconol induces energy depletion and multiple cell death in cancer cells by targeting PDK1-PI3-K/Akt signaling pathway,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 9, article e804, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Liu, N. Wu, L. Ma et al., “Oleanolic acid suppresses aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells by switching pyruvate kinase type M isoforms,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e91606, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Liu, L. Zheng, N. Wu et al., “Oleanolic acid induces metabolic adaptation in cancer cells by activating the AMP-activated protein kinase pathway,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 24, pp. 5528–5537, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Wang, H. Bai, X. Zhang et al., “Inhibitory effect of oleanolic acid on hepatocellular carcinoma via ERK-p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1323–1330, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H.-Y. Kwan, Z. Yang, W.-F. Fong, Y.-M. Hu, Z.-L. Yu, and W.-L. W. Hsiao, “The anticancer effect of oridonin is mediated by fatty acid synthase suppression in human colorectal cancer cells,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 182–192, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Z. Gu, X. Wang, R. Qi et al., “Oridonin induces apoptosis in uveal melanoma cells by upregulation of Bim and downregulation of Fatty Acid Synthase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 457, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. C.-H. Lin, C.-H. Chou, Y.-C. Lin et al., “Osthole suppresses fatty acid synthase expression in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells through modulating Akt/mTOR pathway,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 4786–4793, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T.-X. Wang, Z.-Q. Zhang, Y. Cong, X.-Y. Shi, Y.-H. Liu, and F.-L. Zhao, “Prosapogenin A induces apoptosis in human cancer cells in vitro via inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway and glycolysis,” Oncology Letters, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1323–1328, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Zhao, J.-M. Mao, S.-Y. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y. Tan, and Y. Zhang, “Quercetin induces HepG2 cell apoptosis by inhibiting fatty acid biosynthesis,” Oncology Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 765–769, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. K. Maurya and M. Vinayak, “Quercetin Regresses Dalton's Lymphoma Growth via Suppression of PI3K/AKT Signaling Leading to Upregulation of p53 and Decrease in Energy Metabolism,” Nutrition and Cancer, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. Wiench, T. Eichhorn, M. Paulsen, and T. Efferth, “Shikonin directly targets mitochondria and causes mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 726025, 15 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. Duan, B. Zhang, J. Yao, Y. Liu, and J. Fang, “Shikonin targets cytosolic thioredoxin reductase to induce ROS-mediated apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 70, pp. 182–193, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Chen, J. Xie, Z. Jiang, B. Wang, Y. Wang, and X. Hu, “Shikonin and its analogs inhibit cancer cell glycolysis by targeting tumor pyruvate kinase-M2,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 42, pp. 4297–4306, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Raina, N. J. Serkova, and R. Agarwal, “Silibinin feeding alters the metabolic profile in TRAMP prostatic tumors: 1H-NMRS-based metabolomics study,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 3731–3735, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Raina, C. Agarwal, R. Wadhwa, N. J. Serkova, and R. Agarwal, “Energy deprivation by silibinin in colorectal cancer cells: a double-edged sword targeting both apoptotic and autophagic machineries,” Autophagy, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 697–713, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. Wang, L. Zhao, L.-T. Zhu et al., “Wogonin reverses hypoxia resistance of human colon cancer HCT116 cells via downregulation of HIF-1α and glycolysis, by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling pathway,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 53, supplement 1, pp. E107–E118, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. Q.-Y. Lu, L. Zhang, J. K. Yee, V.-L. Go, and W.-N. Lee, “Metabolic consequences of LDHA inhibition by epigallocatechin gallate and oxamate in MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells,” Metabolomics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–80, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. F. Gao, M. Li, W.-B. Liu et al., “Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits human tongue carcinoma cells via HK2-mediated glycolysis,” Oncology Reports, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1533–1539, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. Moreira, I. Araújo, T. Costa et al., “Quercetin and epigallocatechin gallate inhibit glucose uptake and metabolism by breast cancer cells by an estrogen receptor-independent mechanism,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 319, no. 12, pp. 1784–1795, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J.-T. Hwang, J. Ha, I.-J. Park et al., “Apoptotic effect of EGCG in HT-29 colon cancer cells via AMPK signal pathway,” Cancer Letters, vol. 247, no. 1-2, pp. 115–121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Relat, A. Blancafort, G. Oliveras et al., “Different fatty acid metabolism effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and C75 in adenocarcinoma lung cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 12, article 280, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Brusselmans, E. De Schrijver, W. Heyns, G. Verhoeven, and J. V. Swinnen, “Epigallocatechin-3-gallate is a potent natural inhibitor of fatty acid synthase in intact cells and selectively induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 856–862, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Q. Dai, Q. Yin, L. Wei et al., “Oroxylin A regulates glucose metabolism in response to hypoxic stress with the involvement of Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in human hepatoma HepG2 cells,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. L. Wei, Y. Zhou, C. Qiao et al., “Oroxylin A inhibits glycolysis-dependent proliferation of human breast cancer via promoting SIRT3-mediated SOD2 transcription and HIF1α destabilization,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e1714, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. L. Wei, Y. Zhou, Q. Dai et al., “Oroxylin A induces dissociation of hexokinase II from the mitochondria and inhibits glycolysis by SIRT3-mediated deacetylation of cyclophilin D in breast carcinoma,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 4, article e601, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. L. Wei, Q. Dai, Y. Zhou et al., “Oroxylin A sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to anoikis via glucose-deprivation-like mechanisms: C-Src and hexokinase II,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1830, no. 6, pp. 3835–3845, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Y. Lunt and M. G. Vander Heiden, “Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 27, pp. 441–464, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Cardaci, E. Desideri, and M. R. Ciriolo, “Targeting aerobic glycolysis: 3-bromopyruvate as a promising anticancer drug,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. S. Ganapathy-Kanniappan, M. Vali, R. Kunjithapatham et al., “3-Bromopyruvate: a new targeted antiglycolytic agent and a promise for cancer therapy,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 510–517, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. Q. Zhang, J. Pan, P. E. North et al., “Aerosolized 3-bromopyruvate inhibits lung tumorigenesis without causing liver toxicity,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 717–725, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Pavlides, I. Vera, R. Gandara et al., “Warburg meets autophagy: cancer-associated fibroblasts accelerate tumor growth and metastasis via oxidative stress, mitophagy, and aerobic glycolysis,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1264–1284, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Z. Wang, D. Wang, S. Han et al., “Bioactivity-guided identification and cell signaling technology to delineate the lactate dehydrogenase A inhibition effects of Spatholobus suberectus on breast cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e56631, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. Miao, S. Sheng, X. Sun, J. Liu, and G. Huang, “Lactate dehydrogenase A in cancer: a promising target for diagnosis and therapy,” IUBMB Life, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 904–910, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Z.-Y. Wang, T. Y. Loo, J.-G. Shen et al., “LDH-A silencing suppresses breast cancer tumorigenicity through induction of oxidative stress mediated mitochondrial pathway apoptosis,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 791–800, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. X. Zha, F. Wang, Y. Wang et al., “Lactate dehydrogenase B is critical for hyperactive mTOR-mediated tumorigenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. L. Huang, Z. Yu, T. Zhang, X. Zhao, and G. Huang, “HSP40 interacts with pyruvate kinase M2 and regulates glycolysis and cell proliferation in tumor cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e92949, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. F.-T. Fan, C.-S. Shen, L. Tao et al., “PKM2 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition and migration upon EGFR activation,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1961–1970, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Q. Sun, X. Chen, J. Ma et al., “Mammalian target of rapamycin up-regulation of pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 is critical for aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 4129–4134, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. Hüttemann, I. Lee, A. Pecinova, P. Pecina, K. Przyklenk, and J. W. Doan, “Regulation of oxidative phosphorylation, the mitochondrial membrane potential, and their role in human disease,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 445–456, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. Dimauro and P. Rustin, “A critical approach to the therapy of mitochondrial respiratory chain and oxidative phosphorylation diseases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1792, no. 12, pp. 1159–1167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. Whitaker-Menezes, U. E. Martinez-Outschoorn, N. Flomenberg et al., “Hyperactivation of oxidative mitochondrial metabolism in epithelial cancer cells in situ: visualizing the therapeutic effects of metformin in tumor tissue,” Cell Cycle, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 4047–4064, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. K. M. Owens, M. Kulawiec, M. M. Desouki, A. Vanniarajan, and K. K. Singh, “Impaired OXPHOS complex III in breast cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e23846, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. U. Elia and E. Flescher, “Combined chemotherapy or biotherapy with jasmonates: targeting energy metabolism for cancer treatment,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. S.-Y. Liew, E. J. Stanbridge, K. Yusoff, and N. Shafee, “Hypoxia affects cellular responses to plant extracts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 453–456, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. W. Zeng, P. Liu, W. Pan, S. R. Singh, and Y. Wei, “Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factors in tumor metabolism,” Cancer Letters, vol. 356, no. 2, pp. 263–267, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C.-M. Tang and J. Yu, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 as a therapeutic target in cancer,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 401–405, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. R. P. Baumann, P. G. Penketh, H. A. Seow, K. Shyam, and A. C. Sartorelli, “Generation of oxygen deficiency in cell culture using a two-enzyme system to evaluate agents targeting hypoxic tumor cells,” Radiation Research, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 651–660, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. Z. Yu, X. Zhao, Y. Ge et al., “A regulatory feedback loop between HIF-1α and PIM2 in HepG2 cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e88301, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. W. Tian, Y. Wang, Y. Xu et al., “The hypoxia-inducible factor renders cancer cells more sensitive to vitamin C-induced toxicity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 6, pp. 3339–3351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. Y. Zhang, Y. Du, W. Le, K. Wang, N. Kieffer, and J. Zhang, “Redox control of the survival of healthy and diseased cells,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 2867–2908, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. Lupu and J. A. Menendez, “Pharmacological inhibitors of Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN)—catalyzed endogenous fatty acid biogenesis: a new family of anti-cancer agents?” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 483–494, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. S. Biswas, J. Lunec, and K. Bartlett, “Non-glucose metabolism in cancer cells—is it all in the fat?” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 689–698, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. W.-H. Zhao, C.-Y. Zhao, L.-F. Gao et al., “The novel inhibitory effect of pangdahai on fatty acid synthase,” IUBMB Life, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 185–194, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. W.-X. Tian, L.-C. Li, X.-D. Wu, and C.-C. Chen, “Weight reduction by Chinese medicinal herbs may be related to inhibition of fatty acid synthase,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 19, pp. 2389–2399, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. C.-S. Cheng, Z. Wang, and J. Chen, “Targeting FASN in breast cancer and the discovery of promising inhibitors from natural products derived from traditional Chinese medicine,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 232946, 16 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. W. Tan, J. Lu, M. Huang et al., “Anti-cancer natural products isolated from Chinese medicinal herbs,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, article 27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. W. Tan, Y. Li, M. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Berberine hydrochloride: anticancer activity and nanoparticulate delivery system,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 6, pp. 1773–1777, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. S. Rodríguez-Enríquez, J. C. Gallardo-Pérez, A. Marín-Hernández et al., “Oxidative phosphorylation as a target to arrest malignant neoplasias,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 3156–3167, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  96. J. Yin and X. Bi, “Generation and characterization of virus-free reprogrammed melanoma cells by the piggyBac transposon,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 1591–1599, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. Yu, S. A. Nag, and R. Zhang, “Advances in translational pharmacological investigations in identifying and validating molecular targets of natural product anticancer agents,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 596–609, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus