The Antineuroinflammatory Effect of Simvastatin on Lipopolysaccharide Activated Microglial Cells

Zheng, Xinrui; Liao, Ye; Wang, Jiu; Hu, Shijie; Rudramurthy, Gudepalya Renukaiah; Swamy, Mallappa Kumara; Rohit, Komdur Channabasavaraju; Wang, Yangang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9691085

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and Methods Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 9691085 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9691085

The Antineuroinflammatory Effect of Simvastatin on Lipopolysaccharide Activated Microglial Cells

Xinrui Zheng,¹Ye Liao,¹Jiu Wang,¹Shijie Hu,¹Gudepalya Renukaiah Rudramurthy,²Mallappa Kumara Swamy,³Komdur Channabasavaraju Rohit,⁴and Yangang Wang¹

Academic Editor: Maria T. Cruz

Received01 May 2018

Revised04 Jul 2018

Accepted06 Sept 2018

Published07 Nov 2018

Abstract

Microglial cells, upon hyperactivation, produce proinflammatory cytokines and other oxidative stress mediators causing neuroinflammation, which is associated with the progress of many neurodegenerative diseases. Suppressing the microglial activation has hence been used as an approach for treating such diseases. In this study, the antineuroinflammatory effect of simvastatin was examined in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated rat C6 glioma cells. The cell proliferation and cytotoxic effect of LPS and simvastatin on C6 glioma cells was evaluated by (MTT) assay. Neuroinflammation was induced in differentiated cell lines by treatment with 3.125 μg/mL of LPS for 12 h. Upon induction, the cell lines were treated with different concentrations (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μM) of simvastatin and incubated in a humidified CO₂ incubator for 24 to 48 h. The optimum concentrations of LPS and simvastatin were found to be 3.125 μg/mL and 25 μM, respectively, with a cell viability of more than 90% at 24 h postincubation. Furthermore, proinflammatory marker expression was analyzed by flow cytometry and showed a decrease in interferon-γ, interleukin 6, nuclear factor-κB p65, and tumor necrosis factor-α in simvastatin-treated and LPS-induced neuroinflammatory cells, and the mean fluorescent values were found to be 21.75 ± 0.76, 20.9 ± 1.90, 19.72 ± 1.29, and 16.82 ± 0.97, respectively, as compared to the untreated cells. Thus, we show that simvastatin has the potential to regulate the anti-inflammatory response in microglial cells upon LPS challenge. Hence, simvastatin can be employed as a potent anti-inflammatory drug against neuroinflammatory diseases and neurodegenerative disorders.

1. Introduction

The central nervous System (CNS) contains resident immune cells, such as the microglia and astrocytes, which are responsible for regulating the homeostasis of the brain [1]. The activation of resident immune cells in the CNS, termed as neuroinflammation, occurs due to immune-mediated disorders, viral infections, and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Huntington’s disease (HD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [2–4]. Microglial cells, which are one of the primary components of the brain’s immune system, constantly survey the microenvironment in the CNS. They regulate the activities of the surrounding astrocytes and neurons during inflammation and mediate the process of tissue repair [4, 5]. Neuroinflammation induces microglial cells to produce several cytotoxic mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). However, the overproduction of these mediators causes neurotoxicity, which might further lead to an amplification of the disease state, impaired repair mechanisms, and persistence of inflammatory stimuli [6–9]. Proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β, TNF-α, interferon gamma (IFNγ), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), play a significant role in modulating the inflammatory response by the microglial cells. The genes encoding these proinflammatory cytokines are, in turn, regulated by a set of molecules, such as nuclear transcription factor, kappa B (NF-κB), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [8, 10, 11]. Hence, both NF-κB and MAPK can act as potential targets for the development of various anti-inflammatory drugs [12].

Several earlier studies have reported the use of statins in the treatment of many diseases, including atherosclerosis and multiple sclerosis, and for improvement of cognition [13, 14]. Statins might reduce inflammation by disrupting the proinflammatory signaling pathways and also by modulating the functions of the endothelial cells [15, 16]. It is well established that anti-inflammatory effects of statins reduce the release of several inflammation mediators, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and NO [17]. However, not much is known about the neuroprotective functions of the anti-inflammatory actions of statins. The detailed investigation of this function could prove to be effective in developing drugs for preventing neuronal degeneration in diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have shown the potential immune stimulatory effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin, and its potent applications in the activation of microglial cells and neuroinflammation [15, 18–21]. In the present study, neuroinflammation was induced in rat C6 glioma cell line using LPS. Further, the anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin on LPS-activated microglial cells has been studied by the analysis of the expression of inflammation mediators.

2. Results

2.1. Viability Assay and Determination of Optimum Parameters

The cell viability upon treatment with LPS and simvastatin was tested using MTT [3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide] assay with different concentrations of LPS, simvastatin, and a combination of both (Table 1) and revealed that the cell viability decreased with the increase in the concentration of LPS and simvastatin. About 99.89 ± 0.004% of cells were viable at LPS concentration of 3.125 μg/mL, whereas simvastatin showed 92.17 ± 0.002% cell viability at 25 μM after 24 h of incubation. However, the combined treatment with 3.125 μg/mL of LPS and 25 μM simvastatin resulted in cell viability of 90.17 ± 0.002%. The cell viability further decreased with an increase in incubation time (Table 1). DNA topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin (15 μM) was used as a positive control and restricted the cell viability to 50.45 ± 004% at 24 h of treatment and 27.14 ± 0.009% after 48 h of treatment. Hence, based on their lower cytotoxic effect, the optimum concentrations of LPS and simvastatin were chosen to be 3.125 μg/mL and 25 μM, respectively, with an incubation period of 24 h for proinflammatory studies. Further, comparision of control/untreated data with test data by Dunnett’s test (p < 0.05) has shown high significance. However, the significance difference was not observed between the control cell lines and the cell lines treated with LPS at 3.125 μg/mL, exhibiting cell viability of 99.89 ± 0.127 (p value >0.05); this indicates that LPS at 3.125 μg/mL is not significantly cytotoxic to C6 glioma cell lines. The cytotoxic effect of the optimum concentrations of LPS and simvastatin on C6 cells after 24 h is shown in Figures 1 and 2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

2.2. Estimation of Proinflammatory Markers Expression

The fluorometry assay and statistical analysis using the QuestPro software revealed the decrease of IFN-γ concentrations in simvastatin-treated LPS-induced cells. The mean fluorescent value was found to be 21.75 ± 0.76 with a classification variability (CV) of 48.43. However, LPS-induced cells showed a higher expression of IFN-γ having a mean fluorescent value of 66.69 ± 1.80 and CV value of 125.77. However, the control cells showed a lower mean value of 14.54 ± 0.70 (CV- 49.30), indicating the lower level of IFN-γ expression (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

The estimation of IL-6 expression also revealed reduced levels of IL-6 in LPS- and simvastatin-treated cells with mean fluorescence of 20.9 ± 1.90 (CV- 45.15) as compared to that of only LPS-treated cells with mean fluorescence of 57.12 ± 0.31 (CV 43.56), whereas untreated C6 control cells showed a mean fluorescence of 13.63 ± 1.33 (CV- 40.88) (Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

Furthermore, the estimation of other proinflammatory markers such as NF-κB and TNF-α in LPS- and simvastatin-treated cells also showed the decreased expression level as suggested by the statistical data. The mean fluorescent values of NF-κB and TNF-α were found to be 19.72 ± 1.29 (CV- 34.65) and 16.82 ± 0.97 (CV- 45.11), respectively, in LPS- and simvastatin-treated cells (Figures 5 and 6). However, LPS alone treated and control cells showed higher mean fluorescent values in both NF-κB and TNF-α markers. The mean fluorescent values in NF-κB study were found to be 69.65 ± 1.05 (CV- 34.13) and 8.51 ± 1.01 (CV- 32.24) in LPS alone treated and control cells, respectively. Further, in case of TNF-α the mean values were found to be 74.85 ± 1.73 (CV- 135.15) and 10.71 ± 1.29 (CV-50.15), respectively, in LPS alone treated and control cells (Figures 5 and 6).

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

3. Discussion

Neuroinflammation is a complex process involving various cellular and biochemical reactions in the central nervous system stimulated due to brain injuries, infections, or neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and multiple sclerosis. Following the neuroinflammatory response, the activated glial cells release chemokines and cytokines, which act as inflammatory mediators and generate ROS and nitrogen species [22]. This allows damage recovery in the brain and promotes the restoration of the brain cells and their functions, which is crucial for alleviating neurodegenerative illnesses [23]. In neuroinflammatory diseases, inflammation is the main cause for the pathogenicity; hence, treatment with antineuroinflammatory agents/drugs can be potentially useful in controlling such diseases. In this regard, statins as a class of drugs have been reported to reduce the neuroinflammation; however, detailed mechanisms of action are yet to be identified and verified [24]. Several reports have demonstrated the proneuroinflammatory effects of LPS using different anti-inflammatory agents. However, the mechanisms involved in the inhibition of LPS-mediated neurotoxicity by simvastatin have not been completely elucidated. Therefore, we have validated the action of simvastatin in countering neuroinflammation in C6 glioma cells using flow cytometry assays, which are more advantageous for clinical monitoring and have not been extensively studied.

Statins are the globally used class of medication for the treatment of dyslipidemia and nonlipid related diseases, such as cardiovascular conditions including postmyocardial infarction [17, 25]. Several studies have shown the potential benefits of statins in the treatment and/or prevention of neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis, and this may be attributed to the anti-inflammatory action of statins [13, 14, 26]. The anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin has also been established and it has been shown to contribute to the healing of injured hamster arteries [27]. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies using simvastatin have shown reduction in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-8, in patients with hypercholesterolemia [28]. Several other experimental studies have shown that pretreatment with simvastatin stimulates PPAR-γ receptors and inhibits NF-κB expression, which in turn significantly reduces the proinflammatory cytokines [29]. In addition to the reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines, statins also improve the balance between TNF-α and IL-10 in postmyocardial infarction in rats [30]. Simvastatin is also known to reduce proinflammatory cytokine expression through inhibition of TNF-α-mediated activation of NF-κB [31, 32].

In the present study, inflammation was induced in C6 glioma cells with a nonlethal dose of LPS, followed by treatment with the drug, simvastatin, and the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines were examined to assess the antineuroinflammatory effect of simvastatin. We show a significant reduction in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α (Figures 1–4). As suggested earlier, IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α are the critical proinflammatory elements produced in response to neuroinflammation [33–35], Thus, a significant reduction in the levels of these proinflammatory markers in this study suggests the antineuroinflammatory role of simvastatin in LPS-activated C6 glioma cells. Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed a lesser classification variability in both the tested cells (LPS- and simvastatin-treated) and control cells. The present study is in agreement with the previous studies, where simvastatin and rosuvastatin have been shown to inhibit TNF-α in microglia [17, 33, 36]. The proinflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, produced from the activated microglia, astrocytes, and neurons induces inflammatory responses through a cascade of events. Though astrocytes and neurons are also capable of producing TNF-α, microglia are the predominant contributors during neuroinflammation [34, 35]. It has been observed that simvastatin exerts a neuroprotective role in 6-hydroxydopamine challenged PC12 cells, partly by modulating N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and TNF-α [37]. The present study shows a decrease in levels of IL-6 upon simvastatin treatment, suggesting its role in modulating the proinflammatory response by downregulating the expression of proinflammatory genes. However, the effect of simvastatin on the expression levels of IL-6 has been shown to give variable results with significant decrease in [28] and little [38] and/or no effect of simvastatin on IL-6 levels [39, 40]. NF-κB is a key regulator of the transcription of several genes, including proinflammatory enzymes, proinflammatory transcription factors, chemokines, cytokines, adhesion molecules, and several other factors, and is the central regulator of inflammation [11]. Activated microglial NF-κB is closely associated with the release of ROS and proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β, which can cause secondary neurotoxicity and inflammation-induced neurodegeneration [11, 41, 42]. Likewise, studies have confirmed that LPS induces neuroinflammation-associated gene expression via the NF-κB pathway. Hence, drugs inhibiting NF-κB pathway signaling could prevent LPS-induced neuroinflammatory processes [8, 43, 44]. Plant hormone osmotin has been shown to alleviate LPS-induced neuroinflammation and memory impairment via regulation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway [44]. On the similar lines, we suggest that simvastatin can attenuate LPS-induced NF-κB signaling. Hence, our data corroborates the previous findings that decreased NF-κB expression is effective in reducing the risk of secondary neurotoxicity and inflammation-induced neurodegeneration. In addition, our results show a reduction in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α in simvastatin-treated C6 glioma cell line. Our study confirms that simvastatin can regulate neuroinflammation by negatively modulating the NF-κB pathway and decreasing the expression of other proinflammatory mediators, mainly cytokines. Thus, simvastatin could be evaluated further in order to characterize its potential as an anti-inflammatory drug against neuroinflammation and related diseases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (Cat no: L2630), simvastatin (Cat no: S6196), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (D-PBS; Cat no. TL1006) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. DMEM (Cat no. AL111), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Cat no. RM10432), and MTT reagent (5 mg/ml) (Cat no. 4060) were procured from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India. NF-κB p65-PE (Cat no: 558423), TNF-α–PE (Cat no. 559321), IFN-γ-PE (Cat no. 562016), and IL6-FITC (Cat no. 554544) were obtained from BD India Pvt Ltd., Bengaluru, India.

4.2. Cell Lines and Proliferation

Rat glioblastoma cell line (C6) was obtained from the National Centre for Cell Sciences (NCCS), Pune, India. C6 glioma cells are considered as a common in vitro model system, as these cells retain several characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [45, 46]. The cell lines were revived and proliferated in Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium (DMEM) at 37°C in a humidified CO₂ incubator (5%) (Heal Force Bio-Meditech Holdings Ltd., Shanghai, China). The cell lines were preserved in liquid nitrogen until further use.

4.3. Viability Study by MTT Assay

Viability study was carried to determine the optimum concentration of LPS and simvastatin used in the present study. The MTT assay was carried out by the standard drug camptothecin at a concentration of 15 μM as a positive control and untreated cells as control cell lines. The LPS stock was prepared in double distilled water, while the camptothecin and simvastatin stocks were prepared in 100% Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), respectively. For the viability study, 200 μL C6 cell line suspension was seeded in 96-well plate at the cell density of 20,000 cells per well. The cells were proliferated for about 12 h in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a humidified CO₂ (5%) incubator. After 12 h of the growth, the cell lines were treated separately with a different concentration of LPS (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) and simvastatin drug (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM) and incubated for different time period, i.e., 24 and 48 h at 37°C in a humidified CO₂ (5%) incubator. The positive and negative controls were also run simultaneously. After the incubation period, the spent media were removed and 0.5 mg/mL of MTT reagent (Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India) was added and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. After the completion of incubation time, the MTT reagent was removed and the Formazen crystals formed in the wells were dissolved with 100 μL of DMSO and the optical density (OD) was read in a ELx808 absorbance microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Mumbai, India) at 570 nm. The OD values in each concentration were measured and the viability of the cells was determined by using the formula

4.4. Induction of Neuroinflammation and Simvastatin Treatment

LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) has been used in the neuroinflammation of C6 gliomacell lines. Simvastatin used in the present study was procured from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States. The differentiated cell line was induced for neuroinflammation by treating with 3.125 μg/mL of LPS for 12 h. Upon induction, the cell lines were treated with different concentrations (6. 25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μM) of simvastatin and incubated for 24 h and 48 h to determine the optimum concentration of simvastatin and incubation time. Finally, the MTT assay was performed to determine the percentage of cell viability in each concentration of simvastatin as mentioned in Section 4.2.

4.5. Determination of Proinflammatory Markers Expression

To determine the proinflammatory markers expression, the C6 glioma cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in DMEM in a 6-well plate and allowed to proliferate for 12 h in a humidified CO₂ incubator. After 12 h, of incubation the cells were then cultured in the DMEM containing 3.125 μg/mL of LPS for 24 h. Following the incubation, cells were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and transferred into the DMEM containing simvastatin (25 μM) and incubated for 24 h in a humidified CO₂ incubator. Simultaneously, the cell lines treated with LPS alone and cells without any treatment were used as positive and negative control, respectively. After the completion of incubation period, the cells were trypsinized and harvested by centrifugation at 214 g for 5 min. The cells were then fixed in 70% ice cold ethanol by incubating at -20°C for 30 min, washed twice with PBS, and used in the estimation of different proinflammatory markers.

For the estimation of proinflammatory markers such as NF-κB P65, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL6; the test cell line (simvastatin-treated cells after the LPS-induced inflammation), positive control and negative control were treated with 20 μL of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies against NF-κB P65, TNF-α-, IFN-γ, and IL6 antibodies (BD India Pvt Ltd., Bengaluru, India) for 60 min at room temperature in the dark. Upon completing the incubation, the cells were washed with 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in 0.5 mL of PBS. The cells were then analyzed for relative fluorescence intensity using BD FACS Callibur™ (BD India Pvt Ltd., Bengaluru, India). The relative fluorescence intensity values were analyzed by the cell QuestPro software (Quest Software, California, United States).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All tests were repeated three times and the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to compare the data. QuestPro software (Quest Software, California, United States) was used to analyze all flow cytometry parameters. Further, multiple comparisons were done through Dunnett’s test by comparing the test data with control/untreated data to determine the statistically significant differences. The Dunnett’s test was performed at p < 0.05 level using GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) statistical software.

5. Conclusion

The present study revealed that simvastatin exerts an anti-inflammatory effect on LPS-induced neuroinflammation in the C6 glioma cell line by reducing the expression levels of many proinflammatory cytokines. The anti-inflammatory properties of simvastatin in microglial cells challenged with LPS suggested its possible use as a potent anti-inflammatory drug against neuroinflammation in activated microglia. Thus, simvastatin may be helpful in fighting several neurodegenerative disorders. However, further research is needed to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanisms of action of simvastatin.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xinrui Zheng, Jiu Wang, and Shijie Hu performed flow cytometry analysis; Mallappa Kumara Swamy, Gudepalya Renukaiah Rudramurthy, and Yangang Wang designed the experiments, conducted cell viability studies and anti-inflammatory markers studies, and wrote the manuscript.

References

M. Schwartz, J. Kipnis, S. Rivest, and A. Prat, “How do immune cells support and shape the brain in health, disease, and aging?” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 45, pp. 17587–17596, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Ransohoff and V. H. Perry, “Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 119–145, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. H. Perry and J. Teeling, “Microglia and macrophages of the central nervous system: the contribution of microglia priming and systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 601–612, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-W. Chen, X. Zhang, and W.-J. Huang, “Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (Review),” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 3391–3396, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Sofroniew and H. V. Vinters, “Astrocytes: biology and pathology,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 7–35, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Lull and M. L. Block, “Microglial activation and chronic neurodegeneration,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 354–365, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-Q. Cui, Y.-J. Jia, T. Zhang, Q.-B. Zhang, and X.-M. Wang, “Fucoidan protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced rat neuronal damage and inhibits the production of proinflammatory mediators in primary microglia,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 827–833, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Olajide, H. S. Bhatia, A. C. P. de Oliveira, C. W. Wright, and B. L. Fiebich, “Inhibition of neuroinflammation in LPS-activated microglia by cryptolepine,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 459723, 10 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Das Sarma, “Microglia-mediated neuroinflammation is an amplifier of virus-induced neuropathology,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 122–136, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Soliman, K. L. Puig, C. K. Combs, and T. A. Rosenberger, “Acetate reduces microglia inflammatory signaling in vitro,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 555–567, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R.-H. Shih, C.-Y. Wang, and C.-M. Yang, “NF-kappaB signaling pathways in neurological inflammation: A mini review,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 8, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Schlapbach and C. Huppertz, “Low-molecular-weight MK2 inhibitors: A tough nut to crack!,” Future Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1243–1257, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Reis, V. Estato, T. I. da Silva et al., “Statins decrease neuroinflammation and prevent cognitive impairment after cerebral malaria,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e1003099, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Pihl-Jensen, A. Tsakiri, and J. L. Frederiksen, “Statin treatment in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” CNS Drugs, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 277–291, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. McFarland, S. Anoopkumar-Dukie, D. S. Arora et al., “Molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of statins in the central nervous system,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 20607–20637, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Bedi, V. Dhawan, P. L. Sharma, and P. Kumar, “Pleiotropic effects of statins: new therapeutic targets in drug design,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 389, no. 7, pp. 695–712, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. McFarland, A. K. Davey, and S. Anoopkumar-Dukie, “Statins Reduce Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cytokine and Inflammatory Mediator Release in an in Vitro Model of Microglial-Like Cells,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2017, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
D. A. Gayle, Z. Ling, C. Tong, T. Landers, J. W. Lipton, and P. M. Carvey, “Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced dopamine cell loss in culture: Roles of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and nitric oxide,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Qin, X. Wu, M. L. Block et al., “Systemic LPS causes chronic neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegeneration,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 453–462, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Horvath, N. Nutile-McMenemy, M. S. Alkaitis, and J. A. DeLeo, “Differential migration, LPS-induced cytokine, chemokine, and NO expression in immortalized BV-2 and HAPI cell lines and primary microglial cultures,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 557–569, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Ha, E. Moon, P. Lee, J. H. Ryu, M. S. Oh, and S. Y. Kim, “Acacetin attenuates neuroinflammation via regulation the response to LPS stimuli in vitro and in vivo,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1560–1567, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Milatovic, S. Zaja-Milatovic, R. M. Breyer, M. Aschner, and T. J. Montine, “Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Injury in Developmental Neurotoxicity,” Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, pp. 847–854, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
A. T. Hopper, B. M. Campbell, H. Kao, S. A. Pintchovski, and R. G. Staal, “Recent Developments in Targeting Neuroinflammation in Disease,” in Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry Volume 47, vol. 47 of Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry, pp. 37–53, Elsevier, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Carroll, B. Race, K. Phillips, J. F. Striebel, and B. Chesebro, “Statins are ineffective at reducing neuroinflammation or prolonging survival in scrapie-infected mice,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 98, no. 8, Article ID 000876, pp. 2190–2199, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 1996.
A. M. Malfitano, G. Marasco, M. C. Proto, C. Laezza, P. Gazzerro, and M. Bifulco, “Statins in neurological disorders: An overview and update,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 88, pp. 74–83, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Matsuno, M. Takei, H. Hayashi, K. Nakajima, A. Ishisaki, and O. Kozawa, “Simvastatin enhances the regeneration of endothelial cells via VEGF secretion in injured arteries,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rezaie-Majd, T. Maca, R. A. Bucek et al., “Simvastatin reduces expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1194–1199, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shen, H. Wu, C. Wang et al., “Simvastatin attenuates cardiopulmonary bypass-induced myocardial inflammatory injury in rats by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 649, no. 1-3, pp. 255–262, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Stumpf, S. Petzi, K. Seybold et al., “Atorvastatin enhances interleukin-10 levels and improves cardiac function in rats after acute myocardial infarction,” Clinical Science, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xu, P. Liu, L. Liang et al., “RhoA-mediated, tumor necrosis factor α-induced activation of NF-κB in rheumatoid synoviocytes: Inhibitory effect of simvastatin,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3441–3451, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Antonopoulos, M. Margaritis, R. Lee, K. Channon, and C. Antoniades, “Statins as anti-inflammatory agents in atherogenesis: molecular mechanisms and lessons from the recent clinical trials,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1519–1530, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Churchward and K. G. Todd, “Statin treatment affects cytokine release and phagocytic activity in primary cultured microglia through two separable mechanisms,” Molecular Brain, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Hanisch, “Microglia as a source and target of cytokines,” Glia, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 140–155, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. V. Welser-Alves and R. Milner, “Microglia are the major source of TNF-α and TGF-β1 in postnatal glial cultures; regulation by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and vitronectin,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kata, I. Földesi, L. Z. Feher, L. Hackler, L. G. Puskas, and K. Gulya, “Rosuvastatin enhances anti-inflammatory and inhibits pro-inflammatory functions in cultured microglial cells,” Neuroscience, vol. 314, pp. 47–63, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yan, Y. Xu, C. Zhu et al., “Simvastatin prevents dopaminergic neurodegeneration in experimental parkinsonian models: the association with anti-inflammatory responses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20945, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kinlay, G. G. Schwartz, A. G. Olsson et al., “High-dose atorvastatin enhances the decline in inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL study,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 13, pp. 1560–1566, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Jialal, D. Stein, D. Balis, S. M. Grundy, B. Adams-Huet, and S. Devaraj, “Effect of hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitor therapy on high sensitive C-reactive protein levels,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 15, pp. 1933–1935, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pleiner, G. Schaller, F. Mittermayer et al., “Simvastatin prevents vascular hyporeactivity during inflammation,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 21, pp. 3349–3354, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Block, L. Zecca, and J.-S. Hong, “Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yakovleva, I. Bazov, H. Watanabe, K. F. Hauser, and G. Bakalkin, “Transcriptional control of maladaptive and protective responses in alcoholics: A role of the NF-κB system,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. S29–S38, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, X. Liu, and J. Liu, “Sesquiterpenoids from the root of Panax Ginseng attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior through the BDNF/TrkB and Sirt 1/NF-κB signaling pathways,” Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Badshah, T. Ali, and M. O. Kim, “Osmotin attenuates LPS-induced neuroinflammation and memory impairments via the TLR4/NFκB signaling pathway,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Chanput, J. J. Mes, and H. J. Wichers, “THP-1 cell line: An in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Pagliara, A. Adornetto, M. Mammì et al., “Protease Nexin-1 affects the migration and invasion of C6 glioma cells through the regulation of urokinase Plasminogen Activator and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9/2,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1843, no. 11, pp. 2631–2644, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Xinrui Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1744

Downloads

940

Citations