Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1725936 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1725936

Stimulation Parameters of Manual Acupuncture and Their Measurement

Academic Editor: Atsushi Kameyama
Received18 May 2019
Revised10 Jul 2019
Accepted06 Aug 2019
Published28 Aug 2019

Abstract

The therapeutic effect of manual acupuncture (MA) is closely related to the stimulation amount. In the clinical studies, the stimulation amount is often difficult to be determined. The reason is that there are many parameters affecting the stimulation amount, including manipulation selection, treatment time, needling velocity, and force, and no complete and reasonable scheme is available for the measurement of stimulation parameters. This paper reviewed the theoretical and laboratory measurement studies on MA stimulation, summarized 4 types of available parameters according to the theory of physics, and compared the advantages and disadvantages of the existing methods of parameter measurement. Such efforts are hoped for providing reference for the establishment of the stimulation parameter system of MA and possible technical solutions for future measurement experiments.

1. Introduction

As an ancient treatment method, the clinical effect of manual acupuncture (MA) has been proved in different ways, including randomized control trials [1, 2] and basic experiments [3, 4]. According to the theory of acupuncture, the stimulation of MA comes from specific finger manipulation that drives the translation, rotation, or tremor of the needle [5]. Therefore, it has been reported that different MA manipulations can produce different therapeutic benefits [610]. For example, a comparative study of lifting-thrusting and twirling manipulations showed that both types of skills can decrease the blood pressure and heart rate of the healthy volunteers, but the needling sensation caused by lifting-thrusting is stronger with better intervention effect [11]. Furthermore, even with the same manipulation, the physiological changes or physicochemical reactions of organisms are diverse because of different stimulation parameters such as frequency and depth. Several studies have suggested the twirling method with variable frequencies had the respective effects on gastric motility amplitude [12] and gastric vagal afferent fiber discharge [13]. The different needling depth was also compared for the relief of muscle pain, and the result showed that electrical pain thresholds of the muscle group (depth of 10 mm) increased higher than those of the skin group (a depth of 3 mm) [14]. In clinical studies, the effect of deviation of same acupuncture prescription exists extensively because the different stimulation parameters were selected by different acupuncturists. This phenomenon had also been proved in some quantitative studies of MA manipulation [1517]. Based on this situation, it is difficult to determine whether the subjects of current clinical or experimental research of MA strictly accept the stimulation amount prescribed by the experiment protocol.

Compared with MA, the electroacupuncture is easier to control due to its four specific stimulation parameters, including waveform, frequency, time, and current intensity [18], and its stimulation amount can be adjusted accurately [19]. Based on these characteristics, electroacupuncture is being adopted in more and more clinical treatments [20, 21] and scientific research studies [22, 23] of acupuncture. Therefore, summarizing and measuring stimulation parameters of MA is an active area of research, as it is critical for the determination of stimulation amount of MA and its clinical application and promotion.

According to the operation method of MA, it can be attributed to a kind of physical stimulation driven by finger movements [24, 25]. Some parameters for human motion measurement such as kinematic parameters [26] (including amplitude, velocity, acceleration, angle, angular velocity, angular acceleration, and frequency) and kinetic parameters (force) [27] can provide reference for the establishment of the parameter system of MA. This paper will review the current progress of quantitative research on MA manipulations, analyze and classify the available parameters, and look forward to the future trends of corresponding measurement technologies.

2. Theoretical Research of Stimulation Parameters

Throughout history, the stimulation parameters of MA have been mentioned in some ancient medical books. For example, the force of MA can be controlled by the velocity of needling with proportional relation [28]. Depth and velocity were often discussed for their effect of stimulation intensity, in brief, faster and deeper manipulation generates stronger stimulation [28, 29]. Some books even divided the MA manipulations into several types such as “mild reinforcing-attenuating,” “reinforcing,” and “attenuating” based on the velocity and amplitude of needling [29, 30].

However, lack of parameter classification and quantitative analysis is the biggest issue in ancient medical books. Contemporary studies paid more attentions on the establishment of parameter system according to the theory of physics. The “Acupuncture Manipulation Metrology” proposed by Shi [31] has defined four major stimulation elements (parameters) of MA, including force direction, force magnitude, manipulation time, and time interval between treatments, some recommended combinations of treatment elements were also provided for clinical practice. Due to the different movement characteristics, some scholars regarded that the main stimulation parameters for the lifting-thrusting method and twirling method are “insertion depth, frequency, and duration” [32] and “rotation angle, frequency, and duration” [33, 34, respectively. In terms of the force parameters, Fangjie et al. [35] proposed 3 types of force generated by the fingers operating the needle handle (lifting-thrusting force, twirling force, and swing force), which control the needle to make up-and-down, rotational, and swing motion accordingly. Moreover, in actual operation, the needle handle is often subjected to a combined effect of two or three forces. The paper of Langevin et al. [36] considered the “de qi” reaction has a biomechanical component “needle grasp,” and it is a measurable biomechanical phenomenon associated with manipulation of MA. Except needle grasp, the friction was also identified as an important parameter related to de qi during interaction between needle body and tissues [37].

Although the rigorous parameter system for MA has not been established, some studies or books have applied some parameters to guide education and clinical treatment. The university textbook Techniques of Acupuncture and Moxibustion [38] of China has specified the parameters and the corresponding reference range. For example, the amplitude and frequency of the “lifting-thrusting” method should be about 3∼5 mm and about 60 times per minute, respectively, while the torsion angle of needle during the “twirling” method should be between 180° and 360° once. Yuan [39] further graded the stimulation amount of MA with two parameters “amplitude and frequency,” the small stimulation amount should be <5 mm in amplitude and <90 times/min in frequency; the large stimulation amount should be >10 mm in amplitude and >120 times/min in frequency. Nevertheless, the rigorous data support and related information of measurement experiments of above parameter combinations have not been found yet.

3. The Measurement of Stimulation Parameters

According to the theory of physics [40], the stimulation parameters of MA can be divided into four types, “manipulation parameter,” “kinematic parameter,” “kinetic parameter,” and “time parameter.” The manipulation parameter is the acupuncture manipulations selected by acupuncturist according to the patient’s diagnosis, for example, the lifting-thrusting or twirling method. The measurement of time parameters is relatively easy and can be completed by various types of timing devices, so this paper will detail research progress on measurement methods of kinematic and kinetic parameters.

3.1. The Measurement Research of Kinematic Parameters

Kinematic parameters include speed, acceleration, amplitude, and angle. A common solution for measurement is to modify needle body by adding a multiaxis motion sensor. Leow et al. [41] attached a 3-axis electromagnetic motion sensor to the top of the needle handle and obtained the kinematic parameters such as displacement and angle during the twirling method. The motion sensor was also placed at the acupuncture point in contact with needle body by Seo et al. [42, 43] for acquiring amplitude data in real time. In addition to the use of existing sensors, there are secondary developments based on existing technologies for measurement too. The “AcuSensor technology” was invented by Davis et al. [16], including a motion sensor around the tube for needle insertion, and two main motion components, “displacement” and “rotation,” were detected. Guo et al. [44] designed a sensor based on the digital signal processor (DSP) chip; it was integrated into the needle body for obtaining angle and displacement data. The modification illustration of needle body is shown in Figure 1(a).

The application of sensor technology realized the real-time acquisition of the relevant kinematic parameters of MA, but since the adhesion of sensor increased the weight and volume of needle, which affected the finger sensation of acupuncturist, some researchers chose to modify the operating environment around needle to obtain kinematic parameters without affecting operation. The “acupuncture manipulation tester,” developed by Gu [45], collected the lifting-thrusting and twirling signals with a micromotor sensor around the needle. The wave data derived from the two-channel physiological recorder can reflect the velocity change during needling. Yang et al. [46, 47] developed the “model ATP-I acupuncture manipulation parameter determination apparatus” using variable resistance sensor technology to measure the line displacement, angular displacement, and frequency of the needle (Figure 1(b)).

Although the modification of operating environment solved the issue of finger sensation, MA was performed on the machine, which still has some differences from the operation on human body, for instance, the deficiency of “de qi” sensation. In recent years, with the continuous development of motion-tracking technology based on visible or infrared light, a large number of kinematic parameters can be collected in real time without interference. An optoelectric camera was adopted by Li et al. [48] for capturing the real-time displacement and time course associated with each lifting and thrusting. Tang et al. [15] carried out a two-dimensional motion analysis of the needle body as well as the joints of operational thumb and index finger based on the motion videos of MA (Figure 1(c)). In addition to obtaining the parameters such as amplitude, velocity, and acceleration of the needle and joints, the angle and angular velocity of joint were also obtained. Optical motion capture technology was used by Zhang et al. [49] to obtain the parameters of needle and fingers, and the measured results had also been applied to the data mining, training, and assessment of MA manipulations. The joint angles of fingers were also measured by Yang et al. [50] with similar technology in both the lifting-thrusting and twirling method. Their results showed that the lifting-thrusting was mainly performed by the dorsiflexion of the wrist joint with the angle 7.23° ± 1.87°, while the twirling manipulation was mainly performed by the flexion of the interphalangeal joint of the index finger, and the angle of the 1st and 2nd interphalangeal joints was 28.33° ± 2.18°, 10.43° ± 1.69°. Apart from optical tracking, the needle body movement can also be tracked by ultrasound imaging, and the amplitude and frequency can be obtained during needle insertion and manipulation at both superficial and deep acupuncture points. The anatomical structures around the needle are seen clearly in Figure 1(d) [5154].

Moreover, virtual technology is also used for the quantitative analysis of the needle motion. Due to the complete digital characteristic of this technology, the parameter measurement is relatively simple. For example, the tactile acupuncture manipulation simulation system developed by Leung et al. [55, 56] based on computer virtual imaging technology was used for students to practice MA manipulations (Figure 1(e)). A three-dimensional virtual environment can be established by this system with realistic haptic feedback and real-time parameter display. Similar studies were also reported by Liu et al. [57, 58] and Heng et al. [59]. However, because fingers operate on the virtual needle, the sensation is quite different from the actual operation.

3.2. The Measurement Research of Kinetic Parameters

The kinetic parameters of MA are usually the forces along different axes and the corresponding power. Because the existence of force is inseparable from the interaction of objects, the measurement of kinetic parameters was mainly based on various types of mechanical sensors. The micromechanical sensor-attached measuring needle of acupuncture developed by Li et al. [60] can record the frequency, velocity, and components along vertical and coronal axis during the lifting-thrusting and twirling methods (Figure 2(a)). Micromechanical sensing technology was selected by many other studies too [16, 33, 48, 61] (Figure 2(b)). According to the movement characteristics of basic manipulation, the different micromechanical sensors mainly detect the component along three axes during lifting-thrusting, as well as the torsion and tangential force of twirling. Son et al. [37] further calculated the friction coefficient of tissue to the needle body with a modified Karnopp friction model based on the measured value during the lifting-thrusting method (Figure 2(c)). The dynamic detection system developed by Ding [62] was used for measuring the interaction force between the acupuncturist and patient on needle during each kind of manipulations. Researchers also found that the waveforms and values of force and torsion could further identify the different manipulations reversely [63, 64]. Due to the attachment of micromechanical sensors, the needle body must be modified; therefore, most of the kinetic measurement studies have impacts on the finger sensation during needling inordinately, and the experimental technologies needs further improvement. Simultaneously, there has been no report on the analysis of the power generated by different force and relevant comparative study.

4. Future Work

The main target of future research work is to establish a stimulation parameter system and carry out related research with this system. The approach for this target is the verification of the influence of each parameter on the therapeutic effect with more reasonable measurement technology. The big data accumulation of MA based on this system can provide a quantitative reference for the analysis of the effect study such as “de qi,” and the characteristic summary of different MA manipulations. At present, the corresponding research work has also begun, for instance, the identification of the “de qi” reaction based on the friction coefficient or grip strength of the needle body [36, 37] and the characteristic comparison of MA manipulations “reinforcing” and “attenuating” with kinematic parameters such as velocity and time course [15, 42, 48].

According to the above-mentioned parameter types, some existing but still innovative technologies can provide solution options for the future work. For the measurement of kinematic parameter, markerless motion capture can be taken into consideration. Through the motion capture with high-speed camera, not only the movement of the needle body but also the motion of finger joints of acupuncturist can be quantitative analyzed in three-dimensional space [65, 66]. More importantly, it does not require the placement of any markers on the human’s body, which results in maintaining the naturalness of the tester’s movement [67, 68]. Therefore, this technology has been widely used in the analysis of various sports projects [69] and is very suitable for finger movement research. For example, a markerless finger position capture device “Leap Motion Controller” has been mature and start selling. Several studies about the finger tracking [66], hand gesture recognition [70, 71], and robot-arm design [72, 73] were based on it. Some more precise and professional markerless motion-tracking systems are also used to investigate the movement of fingers or handheld implements [74, 75]. Because the essence of MA is movement of needle and finger joints [76], the markerless motion capture technology can not only measure the MA on the human body but also eliminate the external interference of acupuncturist, which is the most consistent with the actual clinical situation and recommended for the measurement of kinematic parameters.

In terms of the measurement of kinetics parameter, because the mechanical measurement needs to be based on sensor, the modification of the needle body becomes inevitable. Compared with the size of the needle, the microsensing devices used in the existing researches are still too large, and the modified needles are significantly different from the actual clinical operation needles. Therefore, the needle body needs to be attached with smaller and thinner sensors. Nanomechanical sensors can be one option of the solutions and have been used for imaging force fields [77], sensing forces with tiny particles [78, 79], etc. They can be attached to the surface of the needle body to obtain kinetic parameters without significantly changing the shape, sensation, and quality of the needle body. Another alternative approach is surface electromyography (SEMG) of the forearm. SEMG refers to the collective surface electric signal from muscles, which is generated during muscle contraction and commanded by the nervous system [80]. The quantitative relationships between SEMG and muscular force have been proved early [81], and the amplitude of the SEMG should increase proportionately with the square root of the tension [82]. Therefore, the data of SEMG can also be regarded as a kinetic parameter and represent muscular force of fingers during needling. The advantage of the forearm SEMG is that the measuring electrode is located on the forearm and does not interfere with finger movements. There have been many reports on the measurement of the extensor and flexor muscles of the fingers using SEMG [83, 84], and mature measurement solution for finger motion has also been provided [85].

5. Conclusion

According to the current research progress, we summarize four types of parameters that can be the reference for the establishment of the stimulation parameter system of MA, as shown in Table 1, and the meaning of some parameters in this table has be illustrated in Figure 3.


Parameter typeParameters

Manipulation parameterSelection of different acupuncture manipulations
Kinematics parameterAmplitude, velocity, and acceleration along X, Y, and Z axes
Torsion angle, angular velocity, and angular acceleration
Kinetics parameterComponents along X, Y, and Z axes of finger force or tissue resistance
Centripetal force during twirling method
Power generated by finger force or tissue resistance
Time parameterTreatment cycle and frequency
Manipulation cycle and frequency
Time course of the thrusting/lifting or left twirling/right twirling movements

Note. The meaning of some parameters is illustrated in Figure 3. Selection of acupuncture manipulations based on the patient’s diagnosis including “lifting-thrusting” or “twirling” and “reinforcing” or “attenuating”. Treatment cycle: a period of acupuncture treatment followed by a period of rest (no treatment) that is repeated on a regular schedule. Treatment frequency: the acupuncture treatment times in a week or month.

In terms of the parameter measurement, the contemporary quantitative analysis of stimulation parameters of MA shows the characteristics of multiangle and interdisciplinarity, which has achieved certain breakthroughs, but it still exposes many problems. First, although sensor technology can obtain relevant kinematic and kinetic parameters in real time, the modification of the needle body for sensor attachment affects the operational sensation of fingers. Second, the measurement experiment based on the sensors surrounding the needle was performed on an apparatus instead of the human body, which is inconsistent with the actual clinical work. Third, the motion-tracking technology can complete the quantitative analysis of the stimulation parameters of MA without modifying the needle and the surrounding environment, but only kinematic parameters can be acquired, and it is easy to generate measurement errors. At the same time, the micromarkers attached on the fingers may also slightly interfere with the operation. Finally, the resistance encountered by the needle inside human tissue during operation is still hard to be obtained without invasion and interference. The comprehensive comparison of different measurement technologies has been shown in Table 2. From the above, the current bottleneck lacks a complete solution for the measurement of kinematic and kinetics parameters of MA without affecting operation and modifying environment. However, markerless motion capture, nanomechanical sensor, and SEMG may be the possible technical solutions to this issue.


Measurement technologiesMeasurable parametersAdvantagesDisadvantages
Kinematic parametersKinetic parameters

Sensors attached on needle (needle body modification)Yes (motion sensor)Yes (mechanical sensor)(1) Real-time parameter acquisition(1) Increasing the weight and volume of the needle
(2) Measurable kinematics and kinetic parameters(2) Affect the finger sensation.
Sensors surrounds needle (operating environment modification)YesNo(1) Real-time parameter acquisition(1) Performed on machine instead of human body
(2) Maintain the naturalness of finger sensation(2) No kinetic parameters
Motion-tracking technologyYesNo(1) Real-time acquisition of more parameters(1) No kinetic parameters
(2) Maintain the naturalness of tester’s movement(2) Easy to generate measurement errors
(3) Performed on human body
Virtual technologyYesNo(1) Full digitalization and real-time parameter acquisitionThe virtual sensation is quite different from the actual operation
(2) Realistic haptic feedback

It is believed that with the continuous advancement of science and technology, the stimulation parameter research of MA should have more feasible solutions. The establishment of the stimulation parameter system can provide a more objective comparison criteria for the effectiveness evaluation of education, clinical treatment, and experimental intervention of MA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Huayuan Yang and Wenchao Tang developed and designed the study. Ruoyun Lyu and Wenchao Tang wrote the paper. Zonglin Wen, Huayuan Yang, and Ming Gao reviewed this manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81403469), Three-Year Development Plan Project for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Shanghai (Grant no. ZY (2018–2020)-CCCX-2001-2005), and Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine budget research project (Project no. 2019LK078).

References

  1. L. Zhao, J. Chen, Y. Li et al., “The long-term effect of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 508–515, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Wu, B. Chen, X. Yin, P. Yin, L. Lao, and S. Xu, “Effect of acupuncture on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Pain Research, vol. 11, pp. 1489–1496, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. Tian, F. Mo, X. Cai et al., “Acupuncture relieves motion sickness via the IRβ-ERK1/2-dependent insulin receptor signalling pathway,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J.-Y. Oh, Y.-K. Kim, S.-N. Kim et al., “Acupuncture modulates stress response by the mTOR signaling pathway in a rat post-traumatic stress disorder model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 11864, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Stux, B. Berman, and B. Pomeranz, Basics of Acupuncture, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2012.
  6. Z. Yu, L. Luo, Y. Li et al., “Different manual manipulations and electrical parameters exert different therapeutic effects of acupuncture,” Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 754–758, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Xing and Q. Li, “Effects of different manipulations of acupuncture on electrical activity of stomach in humans,” Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. T. Huang, X. Huang, W. Zhang, S. Jia, X. Cheng, and G. Litscher, “The influence of different acupuncture manipulations on the skin temperature of an acupoint,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 905852, 5 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Lu, Y. Guo, C. Q. Guo et al., “Acupuncture with reinforcing and reducing twirling manipulation inhibits hippocampal neuronal apoptosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 770–778, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Yin, H. Yang, W. Yao, Y. Xia, and G. Ding, “Mast cells and nerve signal conduction in acupuncture,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2018, Article ID 3524279, 9 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Huang, W. Zhang, S. Jia et al., “A transcontinental pilot study for acupuncture lifting-thrusting and twisting-rotating manipulations,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 157989, 5 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. L. Gao, Y. Guo, T. Sha et al., “Differential effects of variable frequencies of manual acupuncture at ST36 in rats with atropine-induced inhibition of gastric motility,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Hu, C. Li, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Guo, and Z. Chen, “Influence of gastric motility and gastric vagal afferents fiber discharge frequency normal rats with different frequencies of twirling-rotating manipulation,” Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 106–108, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Itoh, Y. Minakawa, and H. Kitakoji, “Effect of acupuncture depth on muscle pain,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 24, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. C. Tang, H. Y. Yang, T. Y. Liu, M. Gao, and G. Xu, “Motion video-based quantitative analysis of the “lifting-thrusting” method: a comparison between teachers and students of acupuncture,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. T. Davis, D. L. Churchill, G. J. Badger, J. Dunn, and H. M. Langevin, “A new method for quantifying the needling component of acupuncture treatments,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 113–119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. L. Yi, H. Y. Yuan, K. Le, and G. Ming, “Classification and characters of physical parameters of lifting-thrusting and twirling manipulation of acupuncture,” Acupuncture Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. J. A. Omura, “Basic electrical parameters for safe and effective electro-therapeutics [electro-acupuncture, TES, TENMS (or TEMS), TENS and electro-magnetic field stimulation with or without drug field] for pain, neuromuscular skeletal problems, and circulatory disturbances,” Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research, vol. 12, no. 3-4, pp. 201–225, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Baba, I. Hasegawa, S. Ohmori, T. Kaneko, K. Watanabe, and H. Iwama, “The effect of acupuncture or electro-acupuncture on circulatory parameters,” The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 134–139, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Cai, W. Ma, G. T. Wang, and W. D. Shen, “Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for post stroke depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial,” Trials, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 152, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Xu et al., “Effect of electroacupuncture on urinary leakage among women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial,” JAMA, vol. 317, no. 24, pp. 2493–2501, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Liu, Q. Wang, S. Yang et al., “Electroacupuncture inhibits apoptosis of peri-ischemic regions via modulating p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), and c-jun N terminal kinases (JNK) in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-injured rats,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 4395–4404, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Tang, S. Feng, J. Chen et al., “Effects of electroacupuncture on facial nerve function and HSV-1 DNA quantity in HSV-1 induced facial nerve palsy mice,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 693783, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Wang, J. Sikora, L. Hu et al., “ATP release from mast cells by physical stimulation: a putative early step in activation of acupuncture points,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 350949, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Kimura and A. Sato, “Somatic regulation of autonomic functions in anesthetized animals: neural mechanisms of physical therapy including acupuncture,” Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 137–145, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  26. Y. J. Choi, J. E. Lee, W. K. Moon, and S. H. Cho, “Does the effect of acupuncture depend on needling sensation and manipulation?” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Zhang, H. Liu, C. Fu et al., “The biomechanical effect of acupuncture for poststroke cavovarus foot: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial,” Trials, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 146, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. U. Unschuld, H. Tessenow, and J. Zheng, Huang Di nei jing su wen, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011.
  29. P. U. Unschuld, Nan-Jing: The Classic of Difficult Issues, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2016.
  30. J. Yang, Great Compendium of Acupuncture and Moxibustion (Zhen Jiu Da Cheng), People’s Health Publishing House, Beijing, China, 1987.
  31. X. Shi, Acupuncture and Mobustion, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 2007.
  32. S.-Y. Lee, Y.-N. Son, I.-h. Choi, K.-M. Shin, K.-S. Kim, and S.-D. Lee, “Quantitative study of acupuncture manipulation of lifting-thrusting using an needle insertion-measurement system in phantom tissue,” Journal of Korean Medicine, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 74–82, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y.-J. Han, S.-Y. Yi, Y.-J. Lee, K.-H. Kim, E.-J. Kim, and S.-D. Lee, “Quantification of the parameters of twisting–rotating acupuncture manipulation using a needle force measurement system,” Integrative Medicine Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 57–65, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Yin’e, Y. Huayuan, and L. Tangyi, “Study on cluster analysis of acupuncture-manipulation parameters,” World Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Fangjie, H. Yang, and G. Wang, “Overview of mechanical research on basic acupuncture manipulation,” Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 85–87, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  36. H. M. Langevin, D. L. Churchill, J. R. Fox, G. J. Badger, B. S. Garra, and M. H. Krag, “Biomechanical response to acupuncture needling in humans,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2471–2478, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y.-N. Son, J. Kim, H.-s. Lee, K.-M. Shin, Y.-J. Han, and S.-D. Lee, “Friction coefficient for the quantification of needle grasp in the lifting-thrusting method,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1429–1434, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. Dong and T. Ma, Techniques of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China, 2012.
  39. Y. Yuan and Y. Hai, “Preliminary study on the standardization of acupuncture manipulation,” Study Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 230-231, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  40. P. B. Shull, W. Jirattigalachote, M. A. Hunt, M. R. Cutkosky, and S. L. Delp, “Quantified self and human movement: a review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention,” Gait and Posture, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Q. H. Leow, T. Cao, S. L. Cui, and S. C. Tay, “Quantifying needle motion during acupuncture: implications for education and future research,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 482–484, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Seo, I.-S. Lee, W.-M. Jung et al., “Motion patterns in acupuncture needle manipulation,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 394–399, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I.-S. Lee, Y.-S. Lee, H.-J. Park, H. Lee, and Y. Chae, “Evaluation of phantom-based education system for acupuncture manipulation,” PloS One, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID e0117992, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Guo, R. Zheng, and Z. Li, “Design of signal acquisition system based on DSP for acupuncture manipulation,” Industrial Control Computer, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 86-87, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  45. X. Gu, “Development of teaching test apparatus for acupuncture manipulations in TCM,” Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 37-38, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  46. H. Yang, X. Gu, Z. Wang, and W. Yao, “Development and application of acupuncture manipulation parameter analyzer,” Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 35-36, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  47. H. Yang, J. Xia, X. Gu, W. Wang, and B. Cheng, “Development of acupuncture manipulation parameter measuring instrument and analysis of manual force,” Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 51-52, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. Li, L. E. Grierson, M. X. Wu, R. Breuer, and H. Carnahan, “Perceptual motor features of expert acupuncture lifting-thrusting skills,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Zhang, X. Yan, and A. Liu, “An introduction to a newly-developed “acupuncture needle manipulation training-evaluation system” based on optical motion capture technique,” Acupuncture Research, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 556–559, 2016, in Chinese. View at: Google Scholar
  50. P. Yang, X. Sun, Y. Ma, C. Zhang, and W. Zhang, “Quantification research on acupuncture manipulation based on video motion capture,” Journal of Medical Biomechanics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 154–159, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  51. M. Q. H. Leow, T. Cao, S. H. E. Lee, S. L. Cui, S. C. Tay, and C. C. Ooi, “Ultrasonography in acupuncture: potential uses for education and research,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 320–322, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. M. Langevin, E. E. Konofagou, G. J. Badger et al., “Tissue displacements during acupuncture using ultrasound elastography techniques,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1173–1183, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. E. Konofagou and H. M. Langevin, “Using ultrasound to understand acupuncture,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. J. Park, M. Akazawa, J. Ahn et al., “Acupuncture sensation during ultrasound guided acupuncture needling,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 257–265, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P.-A. Heng, T.-T. Wong, K.-M. Leung, Y.-P. Chui, and H. Sun, “A haptic needle manipulation simulator for Chinese acupuncture learning and training,” International Journal of Image and Graphics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 205–230, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K.-M. Leung, P.-A. Heng, H. Sun, and T.-T. Wong, “A haptic needle manipulation simulator for Chinese acupuncture,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 94, pp. 187–189, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  57. Y.-x. Liu, S.-j. Shao, and Z.-g. Yan, “Digitized virtual human body provides a new platform for the study of acupuncture manipulation technique,” Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 24–26, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  58. Y.-x. Liu, Z.-g. Yan, S.-j. Shao et al., “Study on acupunctural manipulation technique based on the digitized virtual human body of force feedback,” Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2292–2294, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  59. P.-A. Heng, S.-X. Zhang, L. Shi, Y.-M. Xie, T.-T. Wong, and Y.-P. Chui, “Visible human based virtual medicine,” IJVR, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 13–20, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  60. Q. Li, F. Li, and B. Ai, “Research of detecting acupuncture needle for acupuncture manipulation,” Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 285–288, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  61. L. Liu and X. Yu, “Development of acupuncture mechanical measuring instrument and preliminary analysis of acupuncture manipulation,” Journal of Jiamusi University, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 326–329, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  62. G. Ding, X. Shen, J. Dai, H. Liu, W. Yao, and X. Li, “Research and development on the dynamic system for detecting the force of acupuncture needle during the acupuncture process in the clinical practice of traditional Chinese medicine,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 121–124, 2003, in Chinese. View at: Google Scholar
  63. C. Wang, J. Xu, and T. Zhang, “Study on twirling reinforcing-reducing manipulation based on the parameter figure of the acupuncture manipulation apparatus,” Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 723–725, 2009, in Chinese. View at: Google Scholar
  64. H.-Y. Yang, T.-Y. Liu, L. Kuai, M. Gao, and Z.-C. Hu, “Research on real-time data collection and demonstration system for acupuncture manipulation,” Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao= Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 311–314, 2006, in Chinese. View at: Google Scholar
  65. B. Lewis, C. J. Nycz, G. S. Fischer, and K. K. Venkatasubramanian, “Authentication-based on biomechanics of finger movements captured using optical motion-capture,” in Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Visual Computing, pp. 167–179, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, July 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  66. J. Y. Tung, T. Lulic, D. A. Gonzalez, J. Tran, C. R. Dickerson, and E. A. Roy, “Evaluation of a portable markerless finger position capture device: accuracy of the leap motion controller in healthy adults,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1025–1035, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Corazza, L. Muendermann, A. Chaudhari, T. Demattio, C. Cobelli, and T. P. Andriacchi, “A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: visual hull and simulated annealing approach,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1019–1029, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. L. Mündermann, S. Corazza, and T. P. Andriacchi, “The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 6, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. T. Theologis and J. Stebbins, “The use of gait analysis in the treatment of pediatric foot and ankle disorders,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 365–382, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. W. Lu, Z. Tong, and J. Chu, “Dynamic hand gesture recognition with leap motion controller,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1188–1192, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. G. Marin, F. Dominio, and P. Zanuttigh, “Hand gesture recognition with jointly calibrated leap motion and depth sensor,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 75, no. 22, pp. 14991–15015, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Artal-Sevil, J. Montañés, A. Acón, and J. Domínguez, “Control of a bionic hand using real-time gesture recognition techniques through leap motion controller,” in Proceedings of the 2018 XIII Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference (TAEE), pp. 1–7, IEEE, La Laguna, Spain, June 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. Pititeeraphab, P. Choitkunnan, N. Thongpance, K. Kullathum, and C. Pintavirooj, “Robot-arm control system using LEAP motion controller,” in Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (BME-HUST), pp. 109–112, IEEE, Hanoi, Vietnam, October 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Schröder, T. Waltemate, J. Maycock, T. Röhlig, H. Ritter, and M. Botsch, “Design and evaluation of reduced marker layouts for hand motion capture,” Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, vol. 29, no. 6, p. e1751, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. Schröder, J. Maycock, and M. Botsch, “Reduced marker layouts for optical motion capture of hands,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games, pp. 7–16, ACM, Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  76. E. Ceseracciu, Z. Sawacha, and C. J. P. o. Cobelli, “Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: proof of concept,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e87640, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. L. M. de Lépinay, B. Pigeau, B. Besga, P. Vincent, P. Poncharal, and O. Arcizet, “A universal and ultrasensitive vectorial nanomechanical sensor for imaging 2D force fields,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 156–162, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. Hebestreit, M. Frimmer, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, “Sensing static forces with free-falling nanoparticles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 121, no. 6, Article ID 063602, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. N. Oh, M. Jun, J. Lee, C.-Y. Eom, and S. Park, “Nanomechanical measurement of bacterial adhesion force using soft nanopillars,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 7966–7970, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Chowdhury, M. Reaz, M. Ali, A. Bakar, K. Chellappan, and T. Chang, “Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques,” Sensors, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 12431–12466, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. H. S. Milner-Brown and R. B. Stein, “The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 549–569, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. R. Merletti and D. Farina, Surface Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016.
  83. G. R. Naik and H. T. Nguyen, “Nonnegative matrix factorization for the identification of EMG finger movements: evaluation using matrix analysis,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 478–485, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  84. A. Krasoulis, S. Vijayakumar, and K. Nazarpour, “Evaluation of regression methods for the continuous decoding of finger movement from surface EMG and accelerometry,” in Proceedings of the 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), pp. 631–634, IEEE, Montpellier, France, April 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  85. N. Shaikh, F. Muhammad, M. F. Shamim, N. Shahid, S. M. Omair, and M. Z. Haque, “Finger movement identification using EMG signal on the forearm,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 12, 2017. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Ruoyun Lyu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

643 Views | 324 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.