Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6269518 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6269518

Hua Xu, Yongchun Deng, Zhi Zhou, Yi Huang, "Chinese Herbal Medicine (Chaihu-Huaji Decoction) Alleviates Postembolization Syndrome following Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Improves Survival in Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer: A Retrospective Study", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2019, Article ID 6269518, 6 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6269518

Chinese Herbal Medicine (Chaihu-Huaji Decoction) Alleviates Postembolization Syndrome following Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Improves Survival in Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Caminiti
Received06 Aug 2018
Revised09 Nov 2018
Accepted06 Jan 2019
Published03 Feb 2019


Objective. To examine the efficacy of Chaihu-huaji decoction combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 125 HCC patients treated in Chongqing Cancer Hospital between January 2012 and December 2014, including 64 patients who received Chaihu-huaji decoction and TACE (Chaihu-huaji group) and 61 patients who received only TACE (control group). The patients were examined until the last follow-up or death. Complications, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity were compared between the two groups. Results. Fever, nausea, vomiting, poor appetite, and leukocytopenia were alleviated in patients who received Chaihu-huaji decoction, and no cases of significant hepatic and renal toxicities related to the herbal medicine were observed in the Chaihu-huaji group. The 3-year overall survival probability was significantly higher in the Chaihu-huaji group (26.47%) than in the control group (13.06%). Conclusion. Chaihu-huaji decoction may prevent adverse events after TACE and prolong overall survival of unresectable HCC patients when combined with TACE.

1. Introduction

According to GLOBOCAN 2012 [1], liver cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death, with an estimated 782,000 new liver cancer cases occurring worldwide and 746,000 people having died of this disease in 2012 (50% of them in China alone). According to the 2015 Cancer Statistics of China [2], the liver cancer incidence and mortality were 466,100 and 422,100, respectively, from 2009 to 2011, making it the fourth most common cancer and the third leading cause of death in China. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the main type of liver cancer.

Liver resection and liver transplantation are curative treatments for early-stage HCC [35]. However, most HCC patients are diagnosed at intermediate to advanced stages, and for these patients, several treatment options may be considered. These consist most commonly of repeated hepatectomy (RH), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) [68]. For tumors of greater size and number in the liver, TACE would be more appropriate [9]; however, postembolization syndrome (PES) following TACE, which is characterized by a series of symptoms, including fever, nausea, vomiting, Poor appetite, abdominal pain, and liver function impairment, can lead to a reduction in the quality of life (QOL) of patients, even prompting withdrawal from treatment.

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients in western countries has been increasing in recent years [10]. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), which has been widely used in China and east Asia as a main CAM therapy, has already become a commonly used treatment for cancer [11]. And, recent studies indicate that TCM could play an important role in the whole course of cancer prevention and treatment, including prevention of tumorigenesis, reducing tumor recurrence and metastasis, and alleviating and even eliminating the toxic effects of the treatments, controlling symptoms [1214], improving QOL, prognosis, and overall efficacy [1518]. In the treatment of liver cancer, CHM is effective in prolonging life expectancy, improving immune response, and reducing side effects of TACE [19]. For example, the FuZheng GuBen decoction can promote the recovery of liver physiological function [20], and Jianpi Ligan decoction (JLD) can improve the efficacy and relieve PES following TACE in unresectable primary liver cancer [21, 22].

Small bupleurum decoction (Xiaochaihu-tang in Chinese; and Sho-saiko-to in Japanese) can strengthen the body’s resistance to pathogenic factors and has long been used in the treatment of chronic liver diseases such as hepatitis and liver cirrhosis in China, Korea, and Japan [23]. It is also useful in preventing inflammation and cancer progression [2426] and can be used in treating cancer cachexia [27]. Abdominal mass pill (Huayu Pill in Chinese) improves the blood rheology index and reduces toxicity and its incidence during radiotherapy [28]. Chaihu-huaji decoction is synthesized from small bupleurum decoction and abdominal mass pill, and in this retrospective study, we aimed to clarify the efficacy of Chaihu-huaji decoction combined with TACE for the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC, and whether the Chaihu-huaji decoction can relieve PES following TACE.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients

Patients with histologically or cytologically documented or radiographically diagnosed HCC treated in Chongqing Cancer Hospital between January 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. We enrolled a total of 125 patients with unresectable HCC who had received TACE treatment, of whom 64 also received Chaihu-huaji decoction (Chaihu-huaji group) and 61 received only TACE (control group). The eligibility criteria were (1) age of 18–70 years; (2) Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≥70; (3) compensated liver function (Child-Pugh class of A or B); (4) no refractory ascites or renal failure; (5) no indication for radical operation; (6) no portal vein thrombosis or extrahepatic metastasis; and (7) no history of previous anticancer therapy.

The study was approved by our institutional review board. All patients signed an informed consent form.

2.2. Treatment
2.2.1. TACE Procedure

TACE was performed in all patients using the Seldinger technique. After the tumor-feeding artery was identified and the catheterized hepatic arteriography was performed, chemotherapeutic agents (5-fluoruracil, 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin, 80 mg/m2) were slowly injected into the selected feeding artery, and 5–30 mL of lipiodol with mitomycin-C (6 mg/m2) emulsion followed for embolization. Occasionally, a gelatin sponge was used to enhance the embolic effect. TACE was usually performed about every 4 weeks, and each session of TACE required hospitalization for 7–10 days. The treatment outcome was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT) within 2 weeks after TACE. The termination of treatment was based on two criteria: insufficient liver function after treatment or no residual liver tissue detected on follow-up imaging.

2.2.2. CHM Administration

Patients in the Chaihu-huaji group received 200 mL of the Chaihu-huaji decoction orally twice daily. The herbal decoction was initially administered on the day of the TACE performance and was continued for 7 days after TACE. The composition of the Chaihu-huaji decoction is shown in Table 1.

Name of herbAmount (g)

Radix bupleuri30
Scutellaria baicalensis9
Pinellia ternata9
Rhizoma sparganii10
Curcuma zedoary10
Fresh ginger9
Rhizoma cyperi10
Betel nut6
Fructus aurantii15
Concha arcae30

2.3. Outcome Measurements and Follow-Up

After the last TACE session, patients were assessed every 3 months for the initial 2 years and every 6 months thereafter by enhanced CT, ultrasonography, serum biochemical analysis, and clinical examination. The patients were followed up until the last follow-up or death. The overall survival was calculated from the date of the treatment initiation to death or the date of the last follow-up.

Complications including fever, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, abdominal pain, and leucopenia were retrospectively analyzed in the two groups during their hospitalization. Hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were assessed based on the medical records of the enrolled patients over the course until 3 months after treatment, with the use of the version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEV5.0) [29].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Baseline comparisons between the two groups were performed using Student’s t test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Overall survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. The statistical analyses were performed using adjusted chi-square test for the two groups. The Fisher’s exact chi-square test was also used if the individual cell size was less than five counts. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SPSS version 20.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics

The patients’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 2. No statistically significant differences in age, gender, number of tumors, main tumor size, Child-Pugh class, KPS, background liver disease, liver cirrhosis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage were observed between the two groups.

CharacteristicChaihu-huaji groupControl group

Age (years)47.51 ± 10.3246.36 ± 9.670.52
Number of tumors
Main tumor size (cm)6.20 ± 0.856.27 ± 0.870.648
Child–Pugh class
Background liver disease
 HBV infection48510.411
 HCV infection105
Liver cirrhosis52520.55
AFP level (ng/mL)
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage

KPS, Karnofsky performance score; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein.
3.2. Complications following TACE

No cases of treatment-related death were observed. Compared with the control group, fewer patients in the Chaihu-huaji group suffered from fever (10/54 versus 19/42, p=0.04), nausea (6/58 versus 14/47, p=0.038), vomiting (5/59 versus 13/48, p=0.032), poor appetite (7/57 versus 17/44, p=0.015), and leukocytopenia (3/61 versus 11/50, p=0.018). Most patients developed pain (29 in the Chaihu-huaji group versus 34 in the control group, p=0.224) after TACE. Five patients in the Chaihu-huaji group and eight in the control group (p=0.332) experienced moderate intraperitoneal hemorrhage. The observed complications are summarized in Table 3.

ComplicationChaihu-huaji groupControl groupp

Fever (n)10190.04
Pain (n)29340.224
Nausea (n)6140.038
Vomiting (n)5130.032
Poor appetite (n)7170.015
Hemorrhage (n)580.332
Leukocytopenia (n)3110.018

TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.
3.3. Drug-Related Adverse Events

No cases of significant hepatic and renal toxicities related to the herbal medicine were observed in the Chaihu-huaji group (Table 4). Liver failure (Child-Pugh class C) occurred in 21 cases in the Chaihu-huaji group and 15 cases in the control group (p=0.446), and 13 patients in the Chaihu-huaji group and 10 in the control group developed abnormal serum creatinine (Cr, p=0.572).

Adverse eventChaihu-huaji groupControl groupp

Child-Pugh class C (n)21150.31
Abnormal serum Cr (n)13100.572

Cr, creatinine; abnormal serum Cr: exceeding 1.5 times the upper limit of normal Cr.
3.4. Overall Survival

During the first 3 years after treatment initiation, 40 of 64 patients in the Chaihu-huaji group and 42 of 61 patients in the control group died. Among them, 19 in the Chaihu-huaji group and 27 in the control group died of tumor progression, while other deaths were caused by hepatic failure. The 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the Chaihu-huaji group than in the control group (26.47% versus 13.06%; hazard ratio [HR]=1.607; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.020–2.533; p=0.0408 by log-rank test; Figure 1).

4. Discussion

TACE is recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable and/or large/multifocal HCC, with no vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, and with satisfactory liver function (Child-Pugh A or B); this treatment should be repeated at intervals of 2–3 months based on the assessment of tumor status and liver function [30]. A low treatment success rate is mainly caused by adverse events, most of which are related to PES, including liver enzyme abnormalities (18.1%), fever (17.2%), abdominal pain (11.0%), vomiting (6.0%), and nausea (1.7%), and hematological/bone marrow toxicity is estimated to occur in 13.5% of patients [31, 32].

In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), chemotherapeutics and embolic agents are considered as the exotic pathogenic qi for damage to the liver and spleen and struggles with healthy qi. Pathogenic qi is between the exterior and interior. The symptoms include alternating fever and chills; fullness and discomfort in the chest and hypochondrium; anorexia, vexation, and vomiting; bitter taste and dry pharynx; and dizziness, thin white tongue fur, and wiry pulse. Embolization of the tumor blood supply during TACE can depress qi, block venation, and aggravate the degree of qi stagnation and blood stasis. Therefore, the symptom of abdominal pain appears.

Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the utility of TCM in relieving adverse events after TACE. Tang et al. [16] found that CHM was effective at reducing side effects and improving long-term survival in cases of unresectable HCC treated with TACE. Xu et al. [21] found that Jian Pi Li Qi (JPLQ) decoction can relieve PES (including fever, pain, fatigue, and lack of appetite) and improve the QOL of patients after TACE. Our study has shown that Chaihu-huaji decoction can relieve the symptoms of fever, nausea, vomiting, poor appetite, and leukocytopenia. Liver and kidney functional damage may be result from the TACE procedure, and CHM might aggravate these insults. However, the present study did not show statistically significant differences in liver and kidney function between the group treated with CHM and that treated without CHM.

Small bupleurum decoction and abdominal mass pill are widely used in China. The Chaihu-huaji decoction used in this study is derived from the integration of Xiao Chaihu decoction and Hua Ji pill. It functions to sooth the liver, invigorate the spleen, eliminate pathogenic factors, and move qi to dissipate blood stasis. Xiao Chaihu decoction originated from the treatise of Cold Damage Diseases written by Zhang Zhongjing at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Hua Ji pill is derived from the Rhinoceros Candle of the Source of the Disease. Bupleurum root and Scutellaria root, bitter and cold in properties, are the core medicinal pair of the decoction. Pinellia ternata, a pungent-warm herb, can invigorate the spleen and harmonize the stomach. When combined with ginger, these herbs, as the antiemetic, dissipate adversely rising qi. Ginseng and Glycyrrhiza uralensis tonify the healthy qi to prevent the return of the pathogenic qi. Rhizoma sparganii trigmae, Rhizoma Zedoary, and hematoxylin promote blood circulation and prevent blood stasis. Cyperus, areca, and Fructus Aurantii regulate qi and relieve pain. Bryozoatum and Concha Arcae eliminate stagnation. This TCM formula can eliminate pathogenic qi and maintain healthy qi, restore the functions of the liver and spleen, and make qi moving smoothly and blood unblocked.

Recently, CHM is emerging as an intriguing and viable choice because of its multilevel, multitarget, and coordinated intervention effects against HCC [33]. Although further research is needed to elucidate the detailed mechanisms of the CHM-mediated anticancer effects, evidence that has accumulated in the past several decades confirms the preventive and therapeutic effects of CHM against HCC. A recent randomized controlled study showed that CHM prevents postoperative recurrence of small HCC and prolongs overall survival [34]. In the present study, the Chaihu-huaji decoction group had an improved 3-year overall survival.

More cellular and molecular mechanisms of the anti-HCC activity of various CHMs have been uncovered [33]. For instance, baicalein, a flavonoid in the Chaihu-huaji decoction, exerts anti-HCC effects by inhibiting the activity of topoisomerase II and suppressing the proliferation of HCC cell lines in vitro [35]; it acts on broad cell signaling networks and leads to a collective inhibition of cell proliferation [36]. The decoction has proven powerful in regulating HCC invasion and metastasis [37].

5. Conclusion

In summary, the present results demonstrate that Chaihu-huaji decoction may reduce the occurrence of side effects after TACE and improve the overall survival of patients with unresectable HCC when combined with TACE.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Hua Xu and Yongchun Deng are the first authors; the two authors made the same contribution to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Yi Huang conceived the study and provided funding supporting. Zhi Zhou revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. Hua Xu and Yongchun Deng made the same contribution to its design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  1. J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit et al., “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. E359–E386, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Chen, R. Zheng, P. D. Baade et al., “Cancer statistics in China, 2015,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 115–132, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. R. Jarnagin, “Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of transplantation, resection, and ablation,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1226–1233, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Truty and J.-N. Vauthey, “Surgical resection of high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma: Patient selection, preoperative considerations, and operative technique,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1219–1225, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Mazzaferro, E. Regalia, R. Doci et al., “Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 334, no. 11, pp. 693–699, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Tabrizian, G. Jibara, B. Shrager, M. Schwartz, and S. Roayaie, “Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 261, no. 5, pp. 947–955, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Wang, G. Liu, J. Li et al., “Early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy treated with re-hepatectomy, ablation or chemoembolization: a prospective cohort study,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology the Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology & the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 236, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C.-M. Ho, P.-H. Lee, W.-Y. Shau, M.-C. Ho, Y.-M. Wu, and R.-H. Hu, “Survival in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after primary hepatectomy: Comparative effectiveness of treatment modalities,” Surgery, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 700–709, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Erridge, P. H. Pucher, S. R. Markar et al., “Meta-analysis of determinants of survival following treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 1433–1442, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X.-F. Zhai, Z. Chen, B. Li et al., “Traditional herbal medicine in preventing recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 90–100, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. C. Wu, “Traditional Chinese medicine in prevention and treatment of liver cancer: function, status and existed problems,” Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 163–168, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Deng, B. R. Cassileth, and K. S. Yeung, “Complementary therapies for cancer-related symptoms,” The Journal of Supportive Oncology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 419–426, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. Li, “Clinical observation on inhibitory effect of liuwei dihuang pill(lwdh)on serious esophageal epithelium proliferation (report of 211 cases),” Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Q. Ling, X. Q. Yue, and C. Ling, “Three advantages of using traditional Chinese medicine to prevent and treat tumor,” Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331–335, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. K. Piao, Y. X. Wang, G. R. Xie et al., “Impact of complementary mistletoe extract treatment on quality of life in breast, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer patients. A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial,” Anticancer Reseach, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 303–309, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. Y. Zheng, C. W. Tang, M. Zhu, W. M. Feng, and Y. Bao, “Chinese herbal medicine, jianpi ligan decoction, improves prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective study,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 2461–2466, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Liu, H. Tan, X. Zhang et al., “Hematopoietic effects and mechanisms of Fufang E'jiao Jiang on radiotherapy and chemotherapy-induced myelosuppressed mice,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 575–584, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. U. Xin-Hua, “Clinical observation of Bazheng huaji decoction combination chemotherapy in the treatment of 28 cases of ovarian cancer,” Nei Mongol Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 322, no. 322, pp. 51–55, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. B. Meng, Q. L. Wen, Y. L. Cui, B. She, and R. M. Zhang, “Meta-analysis: traditional Chinese medicine for improving immune response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,” Explore the Journal of Science & Healing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Tao, L. Dan, F. ling, and G. Peng, “In vivo and in vitro effects of QHF combined with chemotherapy on hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Xu, S. Wang, L. Zhuang et al., “Jian Pi Li Qi Decoction Alleviated Postembolization Syndrome Following Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Integrative Cancer Therapies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 349–357, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. Q. Meng, L. M. Liu, M. A. Xin et al., “Prognosis risk factors and therapeutic effect analysis in primary hepatic carcinoma: 394 cases report,” China Oncology, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J.-K. Lee, J.-H. Kim, and H. K. Shin, “Therapeutic effects of the oriental herbal medicine Sho-saiko-to on liver cirrhosis and carcinoma,” Hepatology Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 825–837, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. Shimizu, “Sho-saiko-to: Japanese herbal medicine for protection against hepatic fibrosis and carcinoma,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 15, Supplement s1, pp. D84–D90, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. C. Oh, W. K. Cho, Y. H. Jeong et al., “Anti-inflammatory effect of Sosihotang via inhibition of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases signaling pathways in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophage cells,” Food & Chemical Toxicology An International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, vol. 53, pp. 343–351, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Sakamoto, T. Mori, K. Sawaki et al., “Effects of Kampo (Japanese herbal) medicine 'Sho-Saiko-To' on DNA-synthesizing enzyme activity in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colonic carcinomas in rats,” Planta Medica, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 152–154, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Kim, M. Im, and J. Y. Ma, “Sosiho-tang ameliorates cachexia-related symptoms in mice bearing colon 26 adenocarcinoma by reducing systemic inflammation and muscle loss,” Oncology Reports, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1841–1850, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Youyi, W. Lili, Y. Xiaojing et al., “Effect of Fuzheng Huayu Pill and Radiotherapy on Blood Rheology and Complications of Liver Cancer,” Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 1433–1442, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  29. U.S.D.O.H.A.H. SERVICES, ““the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CECAE 5.0),” Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program”. View at: Google Scholar
  30. T. T.-T. Cheung, P. C.-H. Kwok, S. Chan et al., “Hong Kong Consensus Statements for the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Liver Cancer, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 40–54, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Lencioni, T. de Baere, M. C. Soulen, W. S. Rilling, and J.-F. H. Geschwind, “Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 106–116, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. Piscaglia and S. Ogasawara, “Patient Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Importance of Benefit/Risk Assessment,” Liver Cancer, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 104–119, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C.-T. Ting, W.-C. Li, C.-Y. Chen, and T.-H. Tsai, “Preventive and therapeutic role of traditional Chinese herbal medicine in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 139–144, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. X. F. Zhai, X. L. Liu, F. Shen, J. Fan, and C.-Q. Ling, “Traditional herbal medicine prevents postoperative recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled study,” Cancer, vol. 124, no. 1, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  35. Y. Matsuzaki, N. Kurokawa, S. Terai, Y. Matsumura, N. Kobayashi, and K. Okita, “Cell death induced by baicalein in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 170–177, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Ye, Y. Che, E. Mcmillen et al., “The effect of Scutellaria baicalensis on the signaling network in hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Nutrition & Cancer, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 530–537, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  37. K. Chen, S. Zhang, Y. Ji et al., “Baicalein inhibits the invasion and metastatic capabilities of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via down-regulation of the ERK pathway,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e72927, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Hua Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles