Efficacy Comparison of Different Acupuncture Treatments for Primary Insomnia: A Bayesian Analysis

Table 2

Network meta-analysis comparisons.

W-M	2.86 (2.05, 3.95)	6.29 (3.36, 12.67)	8.12 (4.07, 16.81)	3.79 (1.85, 8.16)	5.20 (2.43, 11.28)
0.35 (0.25, 0.49)	C-ACU	2.18 (1.10, 4.68)	2.86 (1.48, 5.72)	1.32 (0.62, 2.95)	1.81 (0.87, 4.01)
0.16 (0.08, 0.30)	0.46 (0.21, 0.91)	E-ACU	1.28 (0.51, 3.36)	0.61 (0.22, 1.59)	0.83 (0.30, 2.21)
0.12 (0.06, 0.25)	0.35 (0.17, 0.67)	0.78 (0.30, 1.97)	S-ACU	0.46 (0.17, 1.33)	0.64 (0.24, 1.67)
0.26 (0.12, 0.54)	0.76 (0.34, 1.61)	1.65 (0.63, 4.51)	2.19 (0.75, 5.94)	W-ACU	1.37 (0.47, 3.82)
0.19 (0.09, 0.41)	0.55 (0.25, 1.15)	1.20 (0.45, 3.31)	1.56 (0.60, 4.24)	0.73 (0.26, 2.12)	E + S-ACU

W-M, western medicine; C-ACU, conventional acupuncture; E-ACU, electroacupuncture; S-ACU, scalp acupuncture; W-ACU, warm acupuncture; E + S-ACU, electroacupuncture combined scalp acupuncture; ^∗significant difference. Note. The values in the lower-left part of the table suggest the OR of the column index compared with that of the row index, and the values in the upper-right part of the table suggest the OR of the row index compared with that of the column index. OR > 1.00 of the lower-left and upper-right parts of the table indicates the high effectiveness of the intervention measures listed. Significant results are in bold.