Berberine Inhibits the Expression of SCT through miR-214-3p Stimulation in Breast Cancer Cells

Zhu, Congyuan; Li, Jianping; Hua, Yuming; Wang, Jingli; Wang, Ke; Sun, Jingqiu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2817147

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Herbal Medicine for Prevention and Therapy in Breast Cancer

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 2817147 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2817147

Berberine Inhibits the Expression of SCT through miR-214-3p Stimulation in Breast Cancer Cells

Congyuan Zhu,¹Jianping Li,¹Yuming Hua,¹Jingli Wang,¹Ke Wang,¹and Jingqiu Sun¹

Academic Editor: Azis Saifudin

Received09 Jul 2020

Revised21 Sept 2020

Accepted24 Oct 2020

Published29 Nov 2020

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the suppressive abilities of berberine (BBR) on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells and confirm its underlying mechanisms on miR-214-3p. We first built a panel of 18 miRNAs and 9 lncRNAs that were reported to participate in the mechanism of breast cancer. The RT-qPCR results suggested that BBR illustrated a dosage-dependent pattern in the stimulation to miR-214-3p in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Then, we performed gain-and-lose function tests to validate the role of miR-214-3p contributing to the anticancer effects of BBR. Both BBR and miR-214-3p mimic reduced the cell viability, repressed migration and invasion capacities, increased rates of total apoptotic cells and ratio of Bax/Bcl-2, and increased the percentage of G2/M cells of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells by colony formation and CKK8 assay, scratch wound healing and gelatin-based 3D conformation assay, transwell invasion assay, and cell cycle analysis, respectively. However, miR-214-3p inhibitor counteracted all these effects of BBR. Based on the bioinformatics analysis and dual-luciferase reporter test, we identified binding sites between SCT and miR-214-3p. We further confirmed that BBR massively and dose-dependently reduced the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT in both MCF-7 and MDA-231 cells. We testified that both miR-214-3p mimic and BBR could decrease the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT, while miR-214-3p inhibitor weakened these reductions. In conclusion, BBR suppressed MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by upregulating miR-214-3p and increasing its inhibition to SCT.

1. Introduction

Based on the results of epidemiological investigation, it has been reported that breast cancer is becoming one of the major types of cancer and contributes to the highest mortality rate in gynecologic malignancies [1]. Currently, the mainstream treatments of breast cancer are regional avenues, including radiation and surgery and general tools like chemotherapy and biologic therapies [2]. In order to improve the management of breast cancer, it is necessary to exploit novel therapeutic target.

Noncoding RNA, including microRNA (miRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), participate in various biological processed [3]. Both miRNAs and lncRNAs related to human cancers are referred to as “oncomirs” [4], which are identified as two types: (i) miRNAs or lncRNAs called oncogenes are upregulated or amplified in cancer; (ii) miRNAs or lncRNAs called suppressors are downregulated or deleted in cancer [5]. A handful of miRNAs and lncRNAs, such as miR-101 [6], miR-21 [7], miR-155 [8], LncRNA-H19 [9], lncRNA-SNHG6 [10], and lncRNA-TALNEC2 [11], are considered to participate in the mechanism of proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and molecular signaling in breast cancer. Therefore, these small regulatory miRNAs work as novel targets for anticancer therapeutic strategies.

The chemical name of berberine (BBR) is 2,3-methylenedioxy-9,10-dimenthoxyprotoberberine chloride. BBR is a kind of isoquinoline alkaloid that is extracted from Coptidis Rhizoma or Huanglian. BBR has been proved to possess numerous protective properties, like antimicrobial, cardioprotective, and antidiabetic activities [12, 13]. Among these properties, anticancer activity of BBR has been widely accepted. BBR shows anticancer activity in plenty of cancers, including breast cancers [14]. It is believed that BBR moderates mitochondria and pathway of caspase to induce the apoptosis of breast cancer cells [15]. However, how miRNA regulation plays a role in the inhibition of breast cancer cells by BBR to is still under ambiguous.

In this study, we first made a panel of 18 miRNAs [6–8, 16–30] and 9 lncRNAs [9, 10, 15, 29–34] that were previously reported to be related with breast cancer. Then, based on a series of tests, we identified miR-214-3p as the crucial miRNA mediating in the antitumor effects of BBR in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Furthermore, according to target scan software and a series of tests, we ensured that BBR promoted miR-214-3p expression and suppressed the protein expression of its targets secretin (SCT).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Two human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) were purchased from Chinese Academy of Sciences cell bank (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Thermo) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Thermo) and incubated in an atmosphere of 37^oC humidified and 5% CO₂.

2.2. Introduction of Plasmids and siRNA into Cells

Lipofectamine® 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to transfect the plasmids into cells in accordance with the protocols. Reagent of miR-214-3p mimic or miR-214-3p inhibitor (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) was employed to up- or downregulate the levels of miR-214-3p in 6-well plates with a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells in each well. The negative control (NC) was manipulated by a scrambled miRNA.

2.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

We used the Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8, Beyotime, China) assay and colony formation assay to estimate the effect of BBR on cell proliferation. Briefly, 7 × 10³ cells/well were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with BBR (HPLC ≥ 99%, purchased from Meilun Biologics, Dalian China). After 72 h of incubation, a microplate reader was used at a 450 nm optical density to test the viability of each group cells. In colony formation assay, cells were placed into 6-well plates and maintained in media for two weeks and fixed by methanol and stained by 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma, USA) for 20 min.

2.4. Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

The activity of cell migration was evaluated by scratch wound healing assay and gelatin-based 3D conformation assay. In scratch wound healing assay, a sterile tip was used to scratch each well to form a thin “wound.” Before adding the serum-free medium, PBS was manipulated to wash the floating cells. At 0 and 12 h after cell recovery, Image-Pro Plus software was manipulated for measuring cell migration distance, and the data were averaged. In gelatin-based 3D conformation assay, fully-formed 3D structures were transferred to 0.1% gelatin-coated plates and treated with BBR or miR-214-3p mimic or miR-214-3p inhibitor. The migration levels were evaluated after 24 and 48 h. The medium containing 2% FBS was employed to reduce influence of cell proliferation in this test. 3D structures were imaged by microscope Nikon Eclipse TS 110 and quantified by ImageJ software. The migration index was calculated by the area of cells migrating outwards the 3D structure.

Invasion activities of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using transwell invasion assay. On the upper surface of the membrane, the chambers were coated with Matrigel (1 : 5; 80 μl/well, BD Biosciences). DMEM with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 24 h incubation, 4% paraformaldehyde was used to fix the upper chambers for 10 min. Then, it was stained by crystal violet. The microscope (Olympus) was used to count the numbers of passed cells.

2.5. Apoptosis Assay and Cell Cycle Analysis

The levels of apoptosis were measured by annexin-V and propidium iodide (PI) staining as previously described [35]. Cells were seeded to 6-well plate and treated with DMSO, BBR, miR-214-3p mimic, or BBR with miR-214-3p inhibitor. After 24 h, cells were harvested and stained with annexin-V and propidium iodide for 20 min and then run on a BD FACSCanto II cell analyser (BD Biosciences, USA). At least 10000 single cell events were acquired per sample and analyzed by FlowJo software v10.5.0 (FlowJo, USA).

The methods of cell cycle analysis were performed according to previous report [36]. Cells were seeded to 6-well plate and treated with DMSO, BBR, miR-214-3p mimic, or BBR with miR-214-3p inhibitor. After 24 h, cells were resuspended in ice-cold Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) with 70% ethanol. Cells were centrifuged at 300 x for 5 min and resuspended in DPBS. After 2 h staining of propidium iodide and bovine pancreas ribonuclease, cells were run in BD FACSCanto II cell analyser (BD Biosciences, USA). 50000 single cell events were captured per sample and analysed by FlowJo software v10.5.0 (FlowJo, USA).

2.6. Detection of miRNAs and lncRNAs

We used TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA) to extract total RNA of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells in each group. SYBR Green PCR kit (Thermo) was used for PCR amplification. Each sample was provided with three repeated holes. Internal reference of GAPDH was manipulated to adjusting and the data of mRNA expression were calculated by the 2^−ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences were shown in Table 1.

2.7. Protein Detection of Levels of SCT

The total protein of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was extracted with RIPA lysis method. The protein concentration of each well was detected with a BCA method. Protein content was adjusted to 4 μg/μl, 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis separation was carried out, and the membrane was transferred to PVDF membranes after ionization. Staining was carried out with Ponceau working solution. The antibodies of GAPDH (Sigma no. 2275-PC-020) and SCT (Sigma no. AF6387-SP) were diluted to 1 : 5000 and 1 : 1000, respectively. The diluents were added to be sealed overnight at 4°C. Quantity One software was employed to analyze the gray value of scanned protein bands. The relative expression was equal to the ratio of target protein gray value and GAPDH gray value.

2.8. Prediction of Target Genes

Targetscan7.2 and miRwalk were used to predict downstream target gene of miR-214-3p. Reporter gene plasmids containing wild-type and mutant SCT 3′UTR, psiCHECK-2 plasmids (Promega, C8021, USA), miR-214-3p mimic, and their controls were transfected into MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells for 48 hours and then used. Dual-luciferase reporter gene detection kits were used for operation. Finally, collected cells were detected by chemiluminescence. Three repetitions were designed for each group of experiments, and each experiment was repeated for three times.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software and the results were drawn by Graph Prism 8.0. All the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD ± means). The comparisons of each group were calculated by Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA methods. When , there were statistical differences.

3. Results

3.1. BBR Can Obviously Increase the Expression of miR-214-3p in Both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Cells

We first built a panel of 18 miRNAs and 9 lncRNAs that were reported to participate in the mechanism of breast cancer. The RT-qPCR results suggested that BBR illustrated a dosage-dependent pattern in the stimulation to miR-214-3p in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 1).

(a)

(b)

3.2. BBR Upregulates miR-214-3p Expression to Repress Cell Growth, Invasion, and Migration

Then, we performed gain-and-lose function tests to validate the role of miR-214-3p contributing to the anticancer effects of BBR on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The transfection efficiency was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure 2(a)). The results of colony formation assay demonstrated that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could reduce the colony numbers of MCF-7 cells by 56.62% and 60.33% and MDA-MB-231 cells by 50.42% and 56.21%, respectively (Figure 2(b)). CKK8 assay showed that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could reduce the cell viability of MCF-7 cells by 35.4% and 27.4% and MDA-MB-231 cells by 27.4% and 11.5%, respectively (Figure 2(c)). These results indicated that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could inhibit the proliferation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Scratch wound healing assay (Figure 3) and gelatin-based 3D conformation assay (Figure 4) suggested that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could repress the migration capacities of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. It was observed that both BBR and miR-214-3p mimic prevented the invasion capacities of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells by transwell invasion assay (Figure 5). However, miR-214-3p inhibitor counteracted all these suppressions of BBR treatment (Figures 2–5).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

Transfection efficiency and proliferation evaluation. (a) The transfection efficiency was confirmed by RT-qPCR. (b) Colony formation assay demonstrated that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could reduce the colony numbers of MCF-7 cells by 56.62% and 60.33% and MDA-MB-231 cells by 50.42% and 56.21%, respectively. (c) CKK8 assay showed that both BBR treatment and miR-214-3p mimic could reduce the cell viability of MCF-7 cells by 35.4% and 27.4%, and MDA-MB-231 cells by 27.4% and 11.5%, respectively. vs. NC group. vs. BBR group.

(a)

(b)

3.3. BBR Upregulates miR-214-3p Expression to Induce Cell Apoptosis and G2/M Arrest

After BBR and miR-214-3p mimic administration, there were significant increases of 8.3-fold and 6.9-fold in the rates of total apoptotic cells in MCF-7 cells and 6.3-fold and 4.8-fold in MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively (Figure 6(a)). BBR and miR-214-3p mimic treatment increased the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 by 4.8-fold and 3.1-fold in MCF-7 cells and by 3.9-fold and 3.2-fold in MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively (Figure 6(b)). All these indicated that both BBR and miR-214-3p mimic induce apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Cell cycle analysis was employed to compare the levels of cell combination dose induced by cell loss. The results indicated that BBR and miR-214-3p mimic administration could increase the percentage of G2/M cells by 20% and 17% in MCF-7 cells and by 13% and 9% in MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively (Figure 7). However, miR-214-3p inhibitor counteracted all these stimulations of BBR treatment (Figures 6 and 7).

(a)

(b)

Figure 6

Cell apoptosis assays. (a) The total apoptotic cells and representative scatter plots. After BBR and miR-214-3p mimic administration, there were significant increases of 8.3-fold and 6.9-fold in the rates of total apoptotic cells in MCF-7 cells and 6.3-fold and 4.8-fold in MDA-MB-231 cells. (b) Western blot showed BBR and miR-214-3p mimic treatment increased the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 by 4.8-fold and 3.1-fold in MCF-7 cells and by 3.9-fold and 3.2-fold in MDA-MB-231 cells. vs. NC group. vs. BBR group.

3.4. BBR Promotes miR-214-3p Expression and Represses Protein Expression of Its Targets SCT

Based on the Targetscan7.2 and miRwalk bioinformatics analysis, it was identified that SCT and miR-214-3p had targeted binding sites (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). So, we first verified it by dual-luciferase reporter. Activity of luciferase in miR-214-3p mimic group inpsiCHECK-2-SCT-WT was obviously lower than that of independent sequence group (), while activity of luciferase in miR-214-3p mimic group in psiCHECK-2-SCT-MUT group was not significantly different from that of independent sequence group () (Figure 8(c)). Then, to ensure the assumption that BBR could promote miR-214-3p expression and suppress the protein expression of its targets SCT, we further confirmed that BBR could massively and dose-dependently reduce the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT in both MCF-7 and MDA-231 cells () (Figures 8(d) and 8(e)). Next, we testified that both miR-214-3p mimic and BBR could decrease the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT, while miR-214-3p inhibitor weakened these reductions (Figures 8(f) and 8(g)). These results indicated that BBR promoted miR-214-3p expression and repressed the protein expression of its targets SCT.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 8

(a and b) Targetscan7.2 and miRwalk bioinformatics analysis identified that SCT and miR-214-3p had targeted binding sites. (c) Activity detection of dual-luciferase reporter gene. (d and e) BBR massively and dose-dependently reduced the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT in both MCF-7 and MDA-231 cells. (f and g) Both miR-214-3p mimic and BBR decreased the mRNA expression and protein levels of SCT, while miR-214-3p inhibitor weakened these reductions. vs. NC group. vs. BBR group.

4. Discussion

BBR is a natural alkaloid mainly found in the famous Chinese herb Coptidis Rhizoma. In the beginning, BBR was used in treating diarrhea and gastroenteritis [37]. In subsequent studies, BBR was proved to possess other properties, for instance, antibiosis, cardioprotection, glucose regulation, and antineoplastic activity [12, 13, 35, 38]. In this study, it was found that BBR obviously suppressed the abilities of growth and invasiveness in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. These results were consistent with previous studies [39, 40]. Kim et al. found that berberine could efficiently inhibit growth by inducing cell cycle arrest in anoikis-resistant MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells [39]. It was also indicated that the growth inhibitory effects of berberine treatment on MCF-7 cells might be partly due to the effects on side population cells and ABCG2 expression [40]. Further analysis of these phenotypes is essential for understanding the effect of berberine on anoikis-resistant breast cancer cells. Nonetheless, the antitumor mechanism of BBR in breast cancer cells still remains ambiguous.

In our investigation, the focus was to seek the key ncRNA and its target pathway in the antibreast cancer mechanism of BBR. We first listed a panel of 18 miRNAs [6–8, 16–30] and 9 lncRNAs [9, 10, 15, 29–34] that were previously reported to be related with breast cancer, and we found that BBR illustrated a dosage-dependent pattern in the stimulation to miR-214-3p in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. miRNA is one of the important regulators that act as a posttranscriptional suppression officer. Abnormal levels of miRNA could result in a diversity of regulation in diverse cellular pathways. There is a strong proof that some crucial miRNAs are involved in the progress of breast cancer [41]. To validate the role of miR-214-3p in the suppression of BBR to breast cancer cells, we performed a rescue test and observed that both BBR and miR-214-3p mimic could repress the abilities of growth, invasiveness, and migration in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, while miR-214-3p inhibitor counteracted these suppression. We also found that BBR upregulated miR-214-3p expression to induce cell apoptosis and G2/M arrest. These results indicated that BBR presented anticancer effects through miR-214-3p. Another study showed that lncRNATSLNC8 inhibited miR-214-3p/FOXP2 axis to suppress the proliferation and G1/S phase transition of breast cancer cells [42]. It has been reported that the expression of miR-214-3p is correlated with the proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells [21] and acts as a breast tumor suppressor through the regulation of EMT [43]. In the fields of breast cancer, these studies have established that miR-214-3p had a vital role in the progress of breast cancer. Our results indicated that miR-214-3p was also the target of BBR to present anticancer effects.

Then, after using bioinformatics analysis and searching previous studies, we identified that SCT might be the downstream target of miR-214-3p. To confirm the assumption that BBR could promote miR-214-3p transcription and raise the suppression of its downstream target SCT, we first confirmed that BBR could dose-dependently reduce SCT in both levels of mRNA and protein. After that, we found that both miR-214-3p mimic and BBR repressed SCT mRNA and protein, while miR-214-3p inhibitor weakened these reductions. In physiological conditions, SCT binds to its receptor to mediate the effect of the gastrointestinal hormone on digestion and water homeostasis. The overexpression of SCT in MCF-7 cells led to an increase of the cell proliferation index and cellular migration [44]. The data of this study revealed the fact that miR-214-3p inversely acted on SCT in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. However, whether SCT is an oncogene or a tumor suppressor is still controversial. A number of studies hold the idea that it is an oncogene, as high expression was observed in breast cancer [44], whereas other studies indicated the downregulation of the gene in colorectal cancer [45] and prostate cancer [46]. SCT acts as a gene with double-edge sword activities, which possesses both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive effects. It plays a tumor-suppressive role in normal cells and a proliferation and migration stimulating role in cancer cells. It has been reported that SCT suppresses the proliferation of normal breast cells, while the gene stimulates the proliferation and migration of cancer cells [44].

In conclusion, BBR is indicative of the suppression to MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by upregulating the expression of miR-214-3p and increasing its inhibition to SCT. The miR-214-3p/SCT axis is the therapeutic target in the mechanism of BBR to suppress breast cancer.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Congyuan Zhu, the principal investigator, designed the study, performed the statistical evaluations, assisted in writing the paper and edited it in all its revisions. Jianping Li and Hua Yunming participated in the paper’s design and coordination. Congyuan Zhu, Jingli Wang, and Ke Wang performed the experiments. Jingqiu Sun revised drafts of the article critically for intellectual content.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank everyone who had taken part in this study. This study was supported by the Science Research Foundation of Wuxi Sanitary Bureau (XM1010).

References

M. Ghoncheh, Z. Pournamdar, and H. Salehiniya, “Incidence and mortality and epidemiology of breast cancer in the world,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 43–46, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Hizir, M. Balcioglu, M. Rana, N. M. Robertson, and M. V. Yigit, “Simultaneous detection of circulating oncomiRs from body fluids for prostate cancer staging using nanographene oxide,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 14772–14778, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhong, Y.-H. Pei, J. Wang, J. Chen, S.-S. Jiang, and J.-B. Gong, “MicroRNA expression profile in myocardial bridging patients,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 582–587, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D'Asti, A. Huang, M. Kool et al., “Tissue factor regulation by miR-520g in primitive neuronal brain tumor cells,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 446–459, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dhar, A. Kumar, A. M. Rimando, X. Zhang, and A. S. Levenson, “Resveratrol and pterostilbene epigenetically restore PTEN expression by targeting oncomiRs of the miR-17 family in prostate cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 29, pp. 27214–27226, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Manvati, K. C. Mangalhara, P. Kalaiarasan, N. Srivastava, B. Kumar, and R. N. K. Bamezai, “MiR-101 induces senescence and prevents apoptosis in the background of DNA damage in MCF7 cells,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, p. e111177, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Chanyshev, Y. V. Razumova, V. Y. Ovchinnikov, and L. F. Gulyaeva, “MiR-21 regulates the ACAT1 gene in MCF-7 cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 209, pp. 173–178, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Tiago, N. Conceição, H. Caiado, V. Laizé, and M. L. Cancela, “Matrix Gla protein repression by miR-155 promotes oncogenic signals in breast cancer MCF-7 cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 590, no. 8, pp. 1234–1241, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Si, P. Chen, H. Li, and X. Wang, “Long non-coding RNA H19 regulates cell growth and metastasis via miR-138 in breast cancer,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3213–3225, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Nie, L. Zhou, H. Wang et al., “Profiling the epigenetic interplay of lncRNA RUNXOR and oncogenic RUNX1 in breast cancer cells by gene in situ cis-activation,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1635–1649, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Qiao, D. Chen, Q. Li et al., “Long noncoding RNA TALNEC2 plays an oncogenic role in breast cancer by binding to EZH2 to target p57 KIP2 and involving in p-p38 MAPK and NF-κB pathways,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 3978–3988, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. N. Yuan, C. Z. Cai, M. Y. Wu, H. X. Su, M. Li, and J. H. Lu, “Neuroprotective effects of berberine in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of pre-clinical studies,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 109, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-S. Zhang, J.-H. Zhang, R. Feng et al., “Efficacy and safety of berberine alone or combined with statins for the treatment of hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials,” The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 751–767, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tak, A. Sabarwal, R. K. Shyanti, and R. P. Singh, “Berberine enhances posttranslational protein stability of p21/cip1 in breast cancer cells via down-regulation of Akt,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 458, no. 1-2, pp. 49–59, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Yao, Y. Fu, L Chen et al., “Long non-coding RNA NONHSAT101069 promotes epirubicin resistance, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells through NONHSAT101069/miR-129-5p/Twist1 axis,” Oncogene, vol. 38, no. 47, pp. 7216–7233, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Bolandghamat Pour, M. Nourbakhsh, K Mousavizadeh et al., “Up-regulation of miR-381 inhibits NAD+ salvage pathway and promotes apoptosis in breast cancer cells,” EXCLI Journal, vol. 18, pp. 683–696, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M.-N. Menbari, K. Rahimi, A. Ahmadi et al., “MiR-216b-5p inhibits cell proliferation in human breast cancer by down-regulating HDAC8 expression,” Life Sciences, vol. 237, Article ID 116945, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Qiu, F. Huang, Q. Zhang, W. Chen, and H. Zhang, “miR-205-3p promotes proliferation and reduces apoptosis of breast cancer MCF-7 cells and is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 33, no. 8, Article ID e22966, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tang, C. Song, F Ye et al., “miR-200c suppresses stemness and increases cellular sensitivity to trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 8114–8127, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhu, J. Qiu, T Zhang et al., “MicroRNA-188-5p promotes apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation of breast cancer cells via the MAPK signaling pathway by targeting Rap2c,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 235, no. 5, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. C. Han, H. Wang, F. L. Niu, J. Y. Yan, and H. F. Cai, “Effect miR-214-3p on proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells by targeting survivin protein,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 7469–7474, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yuan, “miR-616 promotes breast cancer migration and invasion by targeting TIMP2 and regulating MMP signaling,” Oncology Letters, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2348–2355, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Meng, J. Fang, Y. Yu et al., “miR-129-5p suppresses breast cancer proliferation by targeting CBX4,” Neoplasma, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 572–578, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. M. Huang, H. F. Ge, C. C Yang et al., “MicroRNA-26a-5p inhibits breast cancer cell growth by suppressing RNF6 expression,” The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 467–473, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, L. Yang, X Guo et al., “Sevoflurane suppresses proliferation by upregulating microRNA-203 in breast cancer cells,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 455–460, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Huang, Y. Y. Wu, S. J. Xing, and Z. W. Yu, “Effect of miR-7 on resistance of breast cancer cells to adriamycin via regulating EGFR/PI3K signaling pathway,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 5285–5292, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yarahmadi, Z. Abdolvahabi, Z. Hesari et al., “Inhibition of sirtuin 1 deacetylase by miR-211-5p provides a mechanism for the induction of cell death in breast cancer cells,” Gene, vol. 711, p. 143939, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhao, X. Ling, X. Li, X. Hou, and D. Zhao, “MicroRNA-138-5p inhibits cell migration, invasion and EMT in breast cancer by directly targeting RHBDD1,” Breast cancer, vol. 26, pp. 817–825, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Wang, J. Zheng, R Li et al., “Long noncoding RNA LINC02582 acts downstream of miR-200c to promote radioresistance through CHK1 in breast cancer cells,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 764, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Ma, X. Qi, X. Lin, L. Li, L. Chen, and W. Hu, “LncRNA SNHG3 promotes cell proliferation and invasion through the miR-384/hepatoma-derived growth factor axis in breast cancer,” Human Cell, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 232–242, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Wang, L. Yan, S. Yang et al., “Long noncoding RNA AC073284.4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition by sponging miR-18b-5p in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 12, pp. 23202–23215, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yu, L. Wang, and B. Zhang, “Long non-coding RNA DRHC inhibits the proliferation of cancer cells in triple negative breast cancer by downregulating long non-coding RNA HOTAIR,” Oncology Letters, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 3817–3822, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Song, P. Sun, Q. He, L. L. Liu, J. Cui, and L. M. Sun, “Long non-coding RNA LINC01287 promotes breast cancer cells proliferation and metastasis by activating Wnt/ss-catenin signaling,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4234–4242, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Li, Y.-b. Ma, Y.-h. Tian et al., “Silencing lncRNA SNHG6 suppresses proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells through miR-26a/VASP axis,” Pathology-Research and Practice, vol. 215, no. 10, Article ID 152575, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Lin, Y. C. Chiu, Y. H. Tsai et al., “Different mechanisms involved in the berberine-induced antiproliferation effects in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 13531–13544, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Palethorpe, E. Smith, Y Tomita et al., “Bacopasides I and II act in synergy to inhibit the growth, migration and invasion of breast cancer cell lines,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 19, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Rabbani, T. Butler, J. Knight, S. C. Sanyal, and K. Alam, “Randomized controlled trial of berberine sulfate therapy for diarrhea due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 979–984, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, Y. Jiang, B. Wang, and N. Zhang, “A review on analytical methods for natural berberine alkaloids,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1794–1815, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Kim, J.-H. Yu, E. Ko et al., “The alkaloid Berberine inhibits the growth of Anoikis-resistant MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines by inducing cell cycle arrest,” Phytomedicine, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 436–440, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, E. Ko, W. Han, I. Shin, S. Park, and D.-Y. Noh, “Berberine diminishes the side population and ABCG2 transporter expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells,” Planta Medica, vol. 74, no. 14, pp. 1693–1700, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Du, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, M. Wei, H. Xu, and S. Wang, “Propofol inhibits proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of MCF-7 cells by suppressing miR-21 expression,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1265–1271, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. X. Qin, X. Q. Yang, G. C. Jin, and Z. Y. Zhan, “LncRNA TSLNC8 inhibits proliferation of breast cancer cell through the miR-214-3p/FOXP2 axis,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 8440–8448, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Min, C. Liu, J. Kuang, X. Wu, and L. Zhu, “miR-214 inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells via downregulation of RNF8,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 791–798, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kang, B. Kim, H.-S. Kang et al., “SCTR regulates cell cycle-related genes toward anti-proliferation in normal breast cells while having pro-proliferation activity in breast cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1923–1931, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fang, S.-L. Wang, S.-B. Zhao et al., “Impact of intraduodenal acetic acid infusion on pancreatic duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1804–1810, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Devaney, C. Stirzaker, W. Qu et al., “Epigenetic deregulation across chromosome 2q14.2 differentiates normal from prostate cancer and provides a regional panel of novel DNA methylation cancer biomarkers,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 148–159, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Congyuan Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

576

Downloads

722

Citations