Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 4352084 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4352084

Alice Nabatanzi, Sanah M. Nkadimeng, Namrita Lall, John D. Kabasa, Lyndy J. McGaw, "Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 4352084, 11 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4352084

Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.

Academic Editor: Armando Zarrelli
Received23 Mar 2020
Accepted05 May 2020
Published17 Jun 2020

Abstract

Kigelia africana is used to manage inflammation among indigenous communities. We hypothesized that K. africana extracts contain phytoconstituents with good antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The methanolic extract of K. africana fruits and Spathodea campanulata leaves (SPK04), K. africana aqueous fruit extract (KFM02), and K. africana acetone fruit extract (KFM05) were subjected to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory assays. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using the ABTS radical scavenging assay, and the MTT cell viability assay was used for cytotoxicity. The extracts were preincubated with enzymes and assayed for 15-LOX and COX-2 enzyme activity using an ELISA method. Nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory effect of the extracts was evaluated and measurement of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) and the anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) was done using ELISA kits. SPK04 had the highest antioxidant activity with a mean inhibition of 99.37 ± 0.56% and an IC50 of 4.28 µg/mL. SPK04 and KFM05 did not inhibit 15-LOX as their IC50 values were >1000 μg/mL. All extracts were safe on Vero cells at the highest concentration (200 µg/mL) tested. KFM02 was the best inhibitor of NO production and had the highest cell viability at both the lowest (50 µg/mL) and highest concentrations (200 µg/mL). SPK04 was the best COX-2 inhibitor while KFM05 expressed the strongest suppression effect for IL-β and IL-6. KFM02 did not inhibit IL-6 at the highest concentration (200 µg/mL). The order of suppression of TNF-α by the extracts differed across concentrations, KFM05 > SPK04 > KFM02 at 200 µg/mL, KFM02 > SPK04 > KFM05 at 100 µg/mL, and SPK04 > KFM02 > KFM05 at 50 µg/mL. All the tested extracts had no inhibitory effect against IL-10. SPK04, KFM05, and KFM02 had good antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity and this supports their use as potential anti-inflammatory therapies. This study presents for the first time the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of K. africana and S. campanulata polyherbal extract. It is also among the very few studies that have reported the inhibitory effect of cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 by K. africana.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is the body’s first protective mechanism to enable tissue healing when faced with injurious stimuli [1]. The body responds to inflammation by releasing proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukins (IL-1β and IL-6), interferons (IFN), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) among others [2]. This is followed by induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) which then synthesizes prostaglandins (PGs) that contribute to inflammation, swelling, and pain [3]. Lipoxygenase (LOX) metabolises arachidonic acids to leukotrienes, a group of inflammatory mediators [4]. Furthermore, when macrophages are activated, they produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) which cause oxidative stress (OS). Oxidative stress is an inflammatory mediator which stimulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide (NO) [5]. Nitric oxide contributes to the exacerbation of inflammatory diseases, inhibits mitochondrial enzymes, and activates COXs to produce PGs [6]. Therefore, an inhibitor of COX-2, LOX, NO, and ROS is likely to be effective in preventing and treating inflammatory diseases. The conventional treatment for inflammation is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [7] among others, but prolonged use of such substances results in toxic effects. A variety of plant constituents such as coumarins, carotenoids, and flavonoids [8] have been isolated and shown to have anti-inflammatory activities both in vitro and in vivo. Hence, the treatment of inflammatory diseases by herbal drugs has been of interest to researchers.

Several scholars have reported K. africana’s traditional uses as an anti-inflammatory among other uses in various communities. K. africana fruits boiled with milk are used in Botswana to treat sexually transmitted diseases; the bark of K. africana is used in Nigeria to treat inflammation, dysentery, and cancer [9, 10], and K. africana fruits are used as anti-inflammatories in Kenya, Embu community [11]. Furthermore, antioxidant [1214] and anti-inflammatory studies [15, 16] have been conducted on the various parts of K. africana and the species has proven effective. The anti-inflammatory activity of S. campanulata has also been documented and scientifically validated. In Senegal, bruised leaves and flowers of S. campanulata are applied to wounds [17] as a poultice. The methanol and aqueous extracts of S. campanulata leaves have been proven to have anti-inflammatory (paw edema induced by carrageenan) activity in rats [18]. Traditionally, K. africana has been used either as a single plant or in combination with other plants for increased potency. In Africa, K. africana, Hypoxis hemerocallidea, and Senecio serratuloides leaves and roots decoction is used to treat sexually transmitted infections and sores [19]. In Uganda, S. campanulata bark mixed with K. africana fruits is used as a dressing for wounds and in the treatment of various skin diseases. Therefore, S. campanulata’s anti-inflammatory activity has been justified both traditionally and scientifically more reason for its adoption as a polyherbal with K. africana in the current study.

The anti-inflammatory activity of K. africana has been proposed to act by suppressing inflammatory mediators [20]. The present study ascertained the anti-inflammatory activity of K. africana extracts through the inhibition of ROS (antioxidant activity), 15-LOX, NO, COX-2, proinflammatory cytokines, and anti-inflammatory cytokines to enhance understanding of the possible mechanisms of activity against inflammation. The cytotoxicity on normal mammalian (Vero African green monkey kidney) cells was also established.

2. Methods

2.1. Plant Collection

Kigelia africana (leaves and fruits) and Spathodea campanulata Beauv. (leaves) were collected in the summer of April 2019 from Lynnwood, Pretoria East, South Africa. Voucher specimens for each of the plant species were prepared and deposited at the HGWJ Schweickerdt Herbarium, University of Pretoria. Herbarium voucher specimen numbers PRU/1/125491/Nabatanzi SA for K. africana and PRU/1/125492002/Nabatanzi SA for S. campanulata were assigned.

2.2. Plant Storage

The leaves of the two plant species were separated from their stems, cleaned of any extraneous matter, and dried separately for 14 days at room temperature. The fruits were washed with running tap water, cut into small pieces, and oven-dried at 40°C for 16 days. The dried plants were milled to a fine powder in a Macsalab mill (Model 200 LAB; Eriez, Bramley, South Africa) and stored at room temperature in closed containers in the dark until used.

2.3. Extraction Procedure

Extraction was done at a ratio of 1 g of finely ground plant material to 10 mL of solvent. Extracts were then prepared:Extract 1 (SPK04): equal amounts of K. africana leaves (250 g) and S. campanulata leaves (250 g) were weighed into one big glass container and to it 5 L of methanol was addedExtract 2 (KFM02): 500 g of K. africana fruits was weighed into a big glass container and to it 5 L of hot water was addedExtract 3 (KFM05): 500 g of K. africana fruits was weighed into a big glass container and to it 5 L of acetone was added

All the solvents used were of technical grade (Merck, Johannesburg, South Africa). After adding the solvents to the powdered samples, the containers and contents were vigorously shaken for 20 minutes on a Labotec model 20.2 shaking machine at high speed. The containers of extracts were then covered with silver foil and macerated for 24 hours at room temperature. After 24 hours, the particulate matter of each extract had sedimented and the supernatant portion was filtered with 0.1 mm2 mesh gauze and then with Whatman No 1 filter paper with a pore size of 11 μm. The water extract (KFM02) was frozen at −40°C and lyophilized in a VIRTIS Benchtop 2 K, 4 K, and 6 K Freeze Dryer, United Scientific. The methanol (SPK04) and acetone (KFM05) extracts were evaporated using a rotavapor (R-114; Büchi, Newcastle, USA) and decanted into preweighed labelled beakers. The extracts were then placed under a stream of air in a fume cupboard at room temperature for further drying. On complete drying, they were stored at refrigerator temperature (2–6°C) until used.

2.4. Antioxidant Activity: 2,2′-Azino-bis (3-Ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic Acid (ABTS) Radical Scavenging Assay

The ABTS radical scavenging capacity of the samples was measured as described by Re et al. [21]. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control and the extract without ABTS as blank. ABTS+ was generated by reacting 7 mM ABTS aqueous solution with 2.4 mM potassium persulfate in the dark for 16 hours at room temperature. Prior to assay, this solution was diluted in methanol and equilibrated at 30°C to give an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02 at 734 nm (BioTek Synergy microplate reader). Ten microlitres of each extract at different concentrations was added to 1 mL of diluted ABTS solution in U-bottom-shaped 96-well microplates. The plates were incubated for 5 min at 37°C under dark conditions, then the absorbance was measured at 734 nm, and the percentage of inhibition was calculated. The percentage ABTS inhibition was calculated using the following formula:where OD is the absorbance.

The IC50 values were calculated from the graph plotted as inhibition percentage against the concentration.

2.5. Inhibition of 15-Lipoxygenase (15-LOX) Enzyme

The lipoxygenase inhibitor screening assay kit [22] was used to screen for inhibitors of 15-LOX. The 15-LOX (Sigma) was made up to a working solution of 200 units/mL and kept on ice. A volume of 12.5 μL of test sample or control (dissolved in DMSO) was added to 487.5 μL of 15-LOX in a 96-well microtitre plate and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. After incubation, 500 μL of substrate solutions (10 μL linoleic acid dissolved in 30 μL ethanol, made up to 120 mL with 2 M borate buffer at pH 9.0) was added to the solution. After 5 min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 234 nm. Quercetin (1 mg/mL) was used as a positive control, while DMSO was used as the negative control (100% enzyme activity or no enzyme inhibition). The percentage enzyme inhibition of each extract compared with negative control as 100% enzyme activity was calculated using the following equation:

The results were expressed as IC50, i.e., concentration of the extracts and controls that resulted in 50% 15-LOX inhibition plotted on a graph.

2.6. The 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Cell Viability Assay

Cytotoxicity of each extract at different concentrations against Vero monkey kidney cells was determined as described by Mosmann [23]. Cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL (100 μL) in 96-well microtitre plates and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified environment. After 24-hour incubation, extracts (100 μL) at varying final concentrations were added to the wells containing cells. Doxorubicin (0.38–40 μM) was used as a positive control. A suitable blank control with equivalent volume of acetone was also included, and the plates were further incubated at 3°C for 48 hours in a CO2 incubator. The medium was removed by aspiration, and cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by suspension in fresh medium (200 μL). Then, 30 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. The medium was removed by aspiration and 100% DMSO (100 μL) was added to dissolve the formed formazan crystals. The absorbance was measured using a microtitre plate reader (BioTek Synergy) at 570 nm. The percentage of cell growth inhibition was calculated based on a comparison with that of untreated cells. The selectivity index (SI) values were calculated by dividing cytotoxicity LC50 values by the MIC values (SI = LC50/MIC).

2.7. Inhibition of Nitric Oxide (NO) Production
2.7.1. Cell Culture

The RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA) and cultured in plastic culture flasks in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing l-glutamine supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% PSF (penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone) solution under 5% CO2 at 37°C and was split twice a week.

All cells were seeded in 96-well microtitre plates and activated by incubation in medium containing LPS (5 μg/mL), and various concentrations of extracts were dissolved initially in DMSO and made up to the required concentration in DMEM. Measurement of nitrite released from macrophages was assessed by the determination of nitrite concentration in the culture supernatant using the Griess reagent. After 24-hour incubation, 100 μL of the supernatant from each well of the cell culture plates was transferred into 96-well microtitre plates and an equal volume of Griess reagent (Sigma) added. The absorbance of the resultant solutions in the wells of the microtitre plate was determined after 10 min at 550 nm. The concentrations of nitrite were calculated from regression analysis using serial dilutions of sodium nitrite as a standard. Percentage inhibition was calculated based on the ability of extracts to inhibit nitric oxide formation by cells compared with the control (cells in media without extracts containing triggering agents and DMSO), which was considered as 0% inhibition.

2.8. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Inhibition Assay

The COX inhibition screening assay directly measures PGF2α by stannous chloride reduction of COX-derived PGH2 produced in the COX reaction [24]. The reaction system consists of reaction buffer, haem, enzyme, and plant extract preincubated at 37°C for 20 min with background and enzyme controls. The reaction was initiated with the addition of arachidonic acid and incubated for 2 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped with the addition of saturated stannous chloride solution for 5 min at room temperature. The prostaglandins were quantified by enzyme immunoassay technique (EIA). An aliquot of these reactions was added to the precoated plates in triplicate together with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) tracer and antiserum and incubated for 18 hours at room temperature on an orbital shaker. The plate was then finally developed with Ellman’s reagent and kept on an orbital shaker in the dark at room temperature for 60 minutes. The absorbance was read at 420 nm. The data were plotted as %B/B0 (standard bound/maximum bound) versus log concentration using a 4-parameter logistic curve fit. The concentration of each sample was determined from a standard curve with appropriate dilutions and used to calculate the percent inhibition as per the following formula:

The results were expressed as IC50, i.e., concentration of the extracts and controls that resulted in 50% COX-2 inhibition plotted on a graph.

2.9. Cytokine Detection

RAW 264.7 macrophages were stimulated with LPS which led to the secretion of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 cytokines. Treatment with the plant extracts was then applied, and subsequently, the amounts of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 were measured using commercial ELABSCIENCE ELISA kits: Mouse IL-6 ELISA Kit, Catalogue no: E-EL-M0044; Mouse TNF-α ELISA Kit, Catalogue no: E-EL-M0049; Mouse IL-10 ELISA Kit, Catalogue no. E-EL-M0046; and Mouse IL-1β ELISA Kit, Catalogue no: E-EL-M0037. The absorbance was read at 450 nm using a microtitre plate reader (BioTek Synergy). The amounts of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 were calculated with the help of a standard curve, which was constructed using serial dilutions of cytokine standards provided with the kit. By comparing the OD of the samples to the standard curve, the concentration of the cytokines in the culture supernatant was determined.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Multigroup analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance levels were set as .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Kigelia africana Extracts Are Highly Potent Free Radical Scavengers

The percentage mean antioxidant capacity of the extracts is presented in Table 1, and the mean IC50 values are presented in Table 2. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard with a mean antioxidant activity of 103.95 ± 4.09% and 99.97 ± 0.12% at 100 mg/mL and 1.56 mg/mL concentrations, respectively. The extracts scavenged the ABTS radical in a concentration-dependent manner. SPK04 possessed the best antioxidant activity, which was 99.37 ± 0.56% and 18.03 ± 4.25% at the highest and lowest concentrations, respectively. KFM02 showed the least antioxidant activity of 109.12 ± 14.32% and 15.3 ± 0.88% at the highest and lowest concentrations, respectively. If antioxidant IC50 values are <50 µg/mL, as was exhibited by SPK04, KFM05, and KFM02 with 4.28, 19.47, and 21.29 µg/mL, respectively (Table 2), it is an indicator that the plant extracts are potent scavengers. Thus, the lower the IC50 value, the more potent is the substance at scavenging ABTS and this implies a higher antioxidant activity [25]. The antioxidant ranking order for the three plant extracts tested was SPK04 > KFM05 > KFM02. Kigelinone and kigelinol were proposed to be the phytochemicals mainly responsible for K. africana’s antioxidant power [26], although others may perhaps also be present. Additionally, free radical eradication by K. africana may be due to the presence of phenols that can donate the hydrogen atoms in their hydroxyl groups [27]. When the amount of ROS produced exceeds the antioxidant capability of the target cell, oxidative stress occurs [28]. Whereas ROS and NO exacerbate inflammation, antioxidants help in scavenging them, thus avoiding cellular injury and diseases [29]. Therefore, the antioxidant effect of Kigelia extracts could contribute to reinforcing their anti-inflammatory properties. Researchers have established the link between oxidants, inflammatory reactions, and infection. In chronic infection and inflammation, the release of leukocytes and other phagocytic cells defends the organism from further injury. The cells do this by releasing free oxidant radicals such as NO, , H2O2, and OH whose actions are inhibited by antioxidants [30].


Concentrations (mg/mL)ABTS radical scavenging activity (mean % ± SEM (n= 3)
SPK04KFM02KFM05Ascorbic acid

100.0099.37 ± 0.56109.12 ± 14.32100.33 ± 1.11103.95 ± 4.09
50.0099.10 ± 0.8985.34 ± 14.3599.70 ± 0.52104.63 ± 4.64
25.0083.7 ± 21.0147.48 ± 18.0981.52 ± 16.2099.52 ± 0.88
12.5074.94 ± 3.6829.77 ± 16.7651.39 ± 13.55100.09 ± 0.22
6.2545.83 ± 8.7527.14 ± 8.9431.21 ± 13.5595.30 ± 4.92
3.1335.82 ± 0.0019.75 ± 6.8520.35 ± 2.9699.73 ± 0.27
1.5618.03 ± 4.2515.3 ± 0.8813.92 ± 13.3099.97 ± 0.12

Positive control.

SamplesIC50 values (μg/mL)LC50 values (μg/mL)
ABTS assay15-LOX inhibitionCytotoxicity on Vero cells

SPK044.28>10000.32 ± 0.11
KFM0221.29307.12 ± 4.680.20 ± 0.01
KFM0519.47>10000.26 ± 0.12
Ascorbic acid−0.02 ± 0.00NDND
QuercetinND24.69 ± 1.43ND
DoxorubicinNDND0.01 ± 0.00

Positive control; ND: not detected. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Several researchers have reported the abundance of antioxidant compounds in plants, thereby justifying their role in scavenging free radicals, thus providing protection to humans against oxidative DNA damage [3134]. Kigelia africana’s antioxidant activity has been investigated by earlier researchers and the reported potency concurs with the results in the current study. A study by Hussein et al. [12] reported that the ethanolic bark (67.33%), fruit (62.66%), and leaf (59.66%) extracts of K. africana possessed good antioxidant activity compared with the standard (quercetin) (94%) in a DPPH assay. In another study, the methanolic stem bark extract of K. africana significantly scavenged DPPH stable radical by 53.2%, compared to the standard ascorbic acid [14]. According to Olubunmi et al. [35], the free radical scavenging activities of K. africana root extract through spectrophotometric assay on the reduction of DPPH were compared favourably with α-tocopherol (standard) at the highest concentration (1000 μg/mL). Our data, therefore, supported the findings of previous studies who reported strong antioxidant activity by K. africana. Therefore, the analysed plant extracts could be developed into natural antioxidants, which have currently attracted considerable attention.

3.2. Treatment with Kigelia africana Extracts Did Not Suppress 15-Lipoxygenase (15-LOX) Enzyme

The plant extracts reconstituted in DMSO were evaluated for their effect on the activity of 15-LOX, and the results expressed as IC50 values are presented in Table 2. SPK04 and KFM05 did not inhibit 15-LOX as their IC50 values were >1000 μg/mL. KFM02 slightly inhibited 15-LOX although it was still a very poor inhibitor with an IC50 value >307.12 ± 4.68 μg/mL. Compared to the IC50 of the positive control quercetin (24.69 ± 1.43 μg/mL), none of the plant extracts inhibited the 15-LOX enzyme. The isomeric enzyme, 15-LOX, plays a role in many inflammatory disorders and is involved in the synthesis of leukotrienes from arachidonic acids. Biologically active leukotrienes are mediators of many proinflammatory and allergic reactions; therefore, the inhibition of the synthesis of leukotrienes by 15-LOX is considered as an important therapeutic strategy [36]. Therefore, the extracts were not able to block the formation of leukotrienes via the arachidonic acid pathway by inhibiting lipoxygenase.

3.3. Kigelia africana Extracts Are Not Cytotoxic to Vero Monkey Kidney Cells

Before selection of extracts for further anti-inflammatory analyses, their toxicity on normal mammalian cells has to be established. It is of paramount importance that only nontoxic extracts be subjected to further anti-inflammatory analyses. Our results indicated that all the analysed plant extracts were safe on Vero cells at the highest concentration tested when compared with the positive control (doxorubicin) which had an LC50 of 0.01 ± 0.00 μg/mL (Table 2). SPK04 was the safest extract, followed by KFM05 and KFM02 with LC50 values of 0.32 ± 0.11, 0.26 ± 0.12, and 0.20 ± 0.01 μg/mL, respectively. Doxorubicin is a standard drug commonly used to treat leukaemia and Hodgkin’s lymphoma, as well as cancers of the bladder, breast, stomach, lung, and ovaries, among others [37].

3.4. Treatment of LPS-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells with Kigelia africana Extracts Inhibits Nitric Oxide (NO) Production

The suppression effect of the extracts on NO production is presented in Table 3. Nitric oxide is a toxic free radical produced by macrophages in response to LPS via oxidation of the terminal guanidine nitrogen atom from L-arginine by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [38]. Inducible NOS is involved in overproduction of NO in response to proinflammatory mediators such as IL-1F3, TNF-α, and bacterial LPS [39]. While a small amount of NO synthesized by endothelial NOS (eNOS) and neuronal NOS (nNOS) is essential for maintaining homeostasis, a significantly increased amount of NO synthesized by iNOS participates in provoking inflammatory process and acts synergistically with other inflammatory mediators. Hence, to control its production is a principal focus in an anti-inflammatory investigation. In this study, the extracts had a concentration-dependent inhibition of NO production. At the lowest concentration (1.6 µg/mL), KFM02 released the lowest amount of NO (35.35 ± 14.86%), therefore having the best NO inhibition capacity and highest cell viability (113.21 ± 16.26%). Likewise, at the highest concentration (100 µg/mL), KFM02 released the lowest amount of NO (54.83 ± 8.18%), having the best NO inhibition capacity and highest cell viability (99.88 ± 3.57%). All the extracts compared well with the standard (quercetin) at both low (64.17 ± 7.01% inhibition/97.53 ± 5.03% cell viability) and high concentrations (94.37 ± 3.31% inhibition/57.05 ± 7.66% cell viability). A slight reduction in cell viability was noticeable as the concentration increased, yet it was clear that even at the highest concentration (100 μg/mL), the percentage of cell viability for all the tested extracts remained above 90%, inferring a noncytotoxic concentration. Therefore, among the extracts, KFM02 was the best NO inhibitor with high cell viability. Nonetheless, all the extracts had a strong ability to inhibit NO production while leaving normal mammalian cells unaffected. The inhibition of NO production by plant extracts may be due to the inhibition of iNOS expression [40]. The extracts in our study had good inhibitory activity on NO production and a low cytotoxicity; therefore, they could be used to mitigate the propagation of inflammation by NO. The reduction of NO is also associated with the reduction of oxidative stress [41].


SamplesConcentration (μg/mL)% NO inhibition% cell viability

KFM021.6035.35 ± 14.86113.21 ± 16.26
12.5046.55 ± 14.7196.99 ± 6.16
50.0055.82 ± 12.0094.95 ± 2.86
100.0054.83 ± 8.1899.88 ± 3.57
SPK041.6042.23 ± 16.07112.79 ± 15.01
12.5044.87 ± 15.74101.72 ± 10.90
50.0050.40 ± 10.4897.65 ± 9.97
100.0059.65 ± 4.0597.75 ± 10.96
KFM051.6037.16 ± 18.86104.95 ± 12.93
12.5054.65 ± 9.83100.39 ± 5.87
50.0059.67 ± 3.5099.41 ± 0.73
100.0063.43 ± 6.0895.34 ± 4.14
Quercetin1.6064.17 ± 7.0197.53 ± 5.03
12.5090.57 ± 3.9483.52 ± 3.87
50.0091.05 ± 5.9961.31 ± 2.19
100.0094.37 ± 3.3157.05 ± 7.66
Doxorubicin2.0089.17 ± 5.65
4.0060.22 ± 5.19
10.0015.55 ± 6.72
20.004.23 ± 4.06

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
3.5. Kigelia africana Extracts Strongly Suppress Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Enzyme

COX-2 is an inducible enzyme which causes the production of PGs and is closely associated with acute and chronic inflammatory disorders [42]. Prostaglandins produced by COX-2 play an important role in the physiological functions of some tissues [43]. Despite some positive features, expression of COX-2 is high in LPS-stimulated inflammation-related cell types (macrophages and mast cells) [44]. The results of the COX-2 study are presented in Figure 1. At the highest concentration (200 µg/mL), SPK04 was the best COX-2 inhibitor, followed by KFM02 and KFM05. At 200 µg/mL, SPK04 and KFM02 were better COX-2 inhibitors than quercetin, the untreated control. At 100 µg/mL, SPK04 was the best COX-2 inhibitor, followed by KFM02 and KFM05. At the same concentration, SPK04 and KFM02 were also better COX-2 inhibitors than quercetin and compared well with the untreated control. At the lowest concentration of 50 µg/mL, KFM05 was the best COX-2 inhibitor, followed by SPK04 and KFM02. At this concentration, KFM05 and SPK04 were better inhibitors than quercetin. At 50 µg/mL, KFM02 had the same COX-2 inhibition capacity as L-NAME, which is an inhibitor of NO synthesis. Overall, SPK04 was the best COX-2 inhibitor, followed by KFM05 and KFM02. Our study results showed that the tested plant extracts had higher COX-2 inhibitory effect at the same concentration as quercetin. The COX-2 inhibitory capacity of the plant extracts being better than that of the standard is evidence of the potency of these extracts in inhibiting COX-2 enzyme activity. The COX-2 inhibitory capacity of these extracts may be explained by the presence of tannins [45]. Tannins affect highly purified enzyme-based targets due to their ability to bind strongly with proteins and this may lead to the inhibition of PG synthesis through blocking the COX enzymes. For anti-inflammatory herbal extracts or herbal-derived compounds, inhibition of COX-2 has commonly been found to be their molecular target [44].

Eldeen and Van Staden [46] reported the COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory effect of K africana leaf ethanol and bark dichloromethane extracts. Whereas not much has been reported on the COX-2 inhibitory effect of K. africana, other studies have reported the inhibitory effect of COX by medicinal plants. Seven lignans and one dihydrochalcone isolated from the leaves of Pleurothyrium cinereum and Ocotea macrophylla were found to be potent inhibitors of COX-2 [47]. Ethyl acetate-soluble extract of the stems of Macrococculus pomiferus was found to inhibit COX-2 [48]. (S)-Coriolic acid and ()-glycerol 1-monolinolate isolated from ethyl acetate-soluble extract of the seeds of Hernandia ovigera showed selective inhibitory activity with cyclooxygenase-2 [49]. The compound 2,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde isolated from Daucus carota seed extracts inhibited COX-2 enzyme very significantly at a concentration of 100 μg/mL [50]. These studies are evidence of the anti-inflammatory activity of plant extracts through COX inhibition although more research needs to be conducted regarding the COX-2 inhibitory effect of all K. africana plant extracts including their mechanisms of action.

3.6. Kigelia africana Extracts Suppress Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Have No Effect on Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression

Cytokines are extremely important for the maintenance of optimum inner environment of our system and for protection from injurious agents. However, they should be regulated and kept at favourable levels. Accumulation of a high level of proinflammatory cytokines amplifies inflammation due to the interdependency of one on the other as the production of proinflammatory cytokines works in a cascade mechanism by downstream effects of earlier released cytokines [51]. For example, IL-1 stimulates TNF-α and IL-6 [52]; meanwhile, the prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) promotes the release of IL-6. Therefore, suppressing the production of a cytokine may influence the reduction of another dependent cytokine. The major proinflammatory cytokines that are responsible for early responses, namely, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, are elevated in LPS-induced macrophages. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and TNF-α participate in the prolonging of chronic inflammation. Therefore, these cellular messengers should be mitigated as a measure to avoid further inflammatory process. Interleukin-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine which plays a central role in limiting host immune response to pathogens, thereby preventing damage to the host and maintaining normal tissue homeostasis. Unlike proinflammatory cytokines, IL-10 cellular messengers should be promoted to avoid further inflammatory process.

In this study, exposure of the cells with LPS significantly increased the production of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α. However, treatment with Kigelia extracts suppressed the production of the cytokines in some cases, and in others, there was no suppression (Figure 2). At the highest concentration (200 µg/mL), KFM05 expressed a strong inhibitory effect on IL1-β which was similar to that of the standard (quercetin). This was followed by SPK04, and KFM02 had the least inhibitory effect although it was higher than that of the untreated control and not significantly different from L-NAME inhibition capacity. At the lowest concentration (50 µg/mL), KFM05 still had the best IL-1β inhibitory effect although it was much lower than the standard but not significantly different from SPK04. At this concentration, KFM02 had no inhibitory effect since it was not significantly different from the control where the cells were stimulated but not treated. Therefore, at all concentrations (200, 100, and 50 µg/mL), KFM05 was the best IL-1β inhibitor, followed by SPK04 and KFM02. At 200 and 100 µg/mL, the inhibitory effect of KFM05 was not significantly different from the standard, making it an excellent IL1-β inhibitor.

KFM05 had the highest IL-6 inhibition capacity at 200 µg/mL followed by SPK04 while KFM02 had the least inhibitory effect which was not significantly different from the untreated control. Implying that KFM02 did not inhibit cytokine IL-6 at 200 µg/mL. At 100 µg/mL, KFM05 was the best IL-6 inhibitor followed by SPK04 and very little inhibitory effect was observed for KFM02. At the lowest concentration (50 µg/mL), KFM05 had the highest IL-6 inhibitory effect. Extracts SPK04 and KFM02 had fairly good inhibition effect and there was no significant difference in IL-6 inhibitory effect by these two extracts at 50 µg/mL. KFM05 was the best IL-6 inhibitor at all concentrations, followed by SPK04, and KFM02 had the least inhibition. At 100 and 50 µg/mL, KFM02 had the same IL-6 inhibition capacity. There was no significant difference between L-NAME inhibitory effect and the untreated control. This implies that L-NAME had barely any inhibitory effect on IL-6. The results are presented in Figure 2.

KFM05 had the highest TNF-α inhibition effect at 200 µg/mL (Figure 2). At the same concentration, the inhibitory effect of SPK04 and KFM02 was not significantly different. At 100 µg/mL, KFM02 had the highest TNF-α inhibitory effect followed by SPK04 and KFM05. The inhibitory effects of KFM05 at 200 and 100 µg/mL were not significantly different to those of SPK04. At the lowest concentration (50 µg/mL), SPK04 had the highest TNF-α inhibition effect followed by KFM02, and KFM05 had the least inhibition effect. Generally, at 100 µg/mL, all the three extracts had the highest inhibition capacity for TNF-α. Furthermore, at all concentrations, the three plant extracts had a higher inhibitory effect for TNF-α than the standard (quercetin) and the untreated control. L-NAME had an inhibitory effect on TNF-α. Therefore, the extracts investigated could inhibit the expression of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α molecules which have been demonstrated as the target for many anti-inflammatory medicinal plants and their compounds [7].

Interleukin-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine structurally related to interferons [53] that plays a central role in limiting the immune response to pathogens, preventing damage to the host, and maintaining normal tissue homeostasis. All the tested extracts had no effect on the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Figure 2). L-NAME had no inhibitory effect on IL-10 while the standard greatly inhibited IL-10.

The good antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of K. africana fruit extracts may be explained by the presence of verminoside [54], an iridoid glycoside. In vitro assays have confirmed that verminoside has significant anti-inflammatory effects, inhibiting both iNOS expression and NO release in the LPS-induced J774.A1 macrophage cell line [55]. Using the carrageenan-induced paw edema model in rats, as well as the acetic acid-induced writhing, hot plate, and formalin-induced paw licking models in mice, Carey et al. [56] reported that the flower extract of K. africana exhibited significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities at doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg body weight in rats and mice. Furthermore, the methanolic extract of K. africana fruit using various in vivo models of inflammation in mice and rats significantly attenuated the inflammation in formaldehyde-induced paw edema, acetic acid-induced vascular permeability, cotton pellet-induced granuloma, estimation of plasma MDA levels, and carrageenan-induced peritonitis models [57]. Verminoside also exhibits cytotoxic activity in the concentration range of 70–355 µM [54]. Hassan et al. [58] reported that K. africana extracts have significant wound-healing properties observing a rapid reduction in exudation and scab formation, classical signs of inflammation. The same study also reported that the lethal dose of the leaf extract is greater than 3 g/kg; this suggests that K. africana is safe to be consumed for the treatment of various ailments. It is proposed that the mechanism of action of K. africana leaf extracts may be due to its angiogenic and mitogenic potential leading to increased cellular proliferation and collagen synthesis [58], thereby assisting in scar tissue formation and reperfusion of the injured site, thus resolving the sequela of inflammation.

Among the three tested plant extracts, the polymethanolic extract (SPK04) showed more potency in all experiments as compared to the mono extracts KFM05 and KFM02. SPK04 is a combination of K. africana leaves and S. campanulata leaves in equal amounts. This extract was made to mimic the traditional preparation of these plants before their usage in wound healing and skin infections [17]. Herbal medicine preparations are made of either a single plant or a combination of more than one plant. When two or more plants are used to make a herbal preparation, the resultant is a polyherbal formulation (PHF). Polyherbalism is more common than single herbal preparations and this also dates to ancient times [59]. The therapeutic effect of a polyherbal is based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic synergism of the different herbs in the preparation [60]. Therefore, since in polyherbals a combination of phytochemicals acts on multiple targets at the same time, therapeutic activity is more significant than that of a single herb preparation [61] which may explain the potency of SPK04. The extracting solvents used in this study were water, acetone, and methanol. The methanolic extract (SPK04) showed more potency than the hot water (KFM02) and acetone (KFM05) extracts. The potency of the methanolic extract may be explained by the ability of methanol to extract lower molecular weight polyphenols, whereas water and acetone are good for the extraction of higher molecular weight flavanols [62]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the free radical scavenging activity of K. africana may be due to the presence of phenols that can donate the hydrogen atoms in their hydroxyl groups [27]. Thus, the potency of SPK04 may be explained by its polyherbal nature and the nature of the extraction solvent used.

4. Conclusion

The in vitro antioxidant assays indicate that the tested plant extracts are significant sources of natural antioxidants, which might be helpful in preventing oxidative stress. Additionally, there is a potential that these extracts could be used as additives in the food industry for purposes of providing good protection against oxidative damage. Our study results also indicated that the extracts exhibited anti-inflammatory properties by suppressing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1 β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in LPS-stimulated macrophages and COX-2 enzyme; thus, the hypothesis of the study was accepted. Fortunately, our extracts did not suppress the anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) which further justifies their selective inhibitory activity on important cytokines. Lastly, results of this study suggest that the bioactive constituents of K. africana extracts and S. campanulata in SPK04 had both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Antioxidants act by scavenging free radicals such as reactive oxygen species, hydroxyl radicals, and nitric oxide while anti-inflammatory mediators act by modulating the activities of proinflammatory enzymes and cytokines. The study also gives insights on K. africana’s safety to normal mammalian cells. Thus, we recommend further research be conducted to isolate, identify, and characterize the bioactive compounds that are responsible for the activities. Once the active compounds have been isolated, the mechanism of activity can be examined. Prior to clinical use, the in vivo antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of these extracts need to be assessed.

Abbreviations

DPPH:2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
ABTS:2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid
MTT:3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
LPS:Lipopolysaccharides
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
OS:Oxidative stress
NO:Nitric oxide
PGs:Prostaglandins
IL:Interleukin
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
ANOVA:Analysis of variance
COX-2:Cyclooxygenase-2
15-LOX:15-Lipoxygenase
PUFAs:Polyunsaturated fatty acids
DMSO:Dimethylsulphoxide
NSAIDs:Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
SOD:Superoxide dismutase
PBS:Phosphate-buffered saline
DMEM:Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
L-NAME:N-Omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride.

Data Availability

All data supporting our findings are adequately included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Authors’ Contributions

Alice Nabatanzi and Sanah Nkadimeng performed experiments and data analysis. Alice Nabatanzi wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Lyndy McGaw, Namrita Lall, and John David Kabasa provided facilities, supervised the research, and revised the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Carnegie Cooperation of New York through Future Africa, University of Pretoria, South Africa, for funding this work. They also express their heartfelt gratitude to all the persons who made this work a success: (i) Professor David Bager (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa) identified plant collection sites in Lynnwood, Pretoria East, South Africa; (ii) Mr. Gertkltze permitted us to collect Kigelia africana samples from his compound in Lynnwood, Pretoria East, South Africa; (iii) Mr. Roelf Coertze (Farm Manager, University of Pretoria Experimental Farm) permitted us to collect plant samples from the farm; (iii) Mr. Emmanuel (Assistant Farm Manager, University of Pretoria Experimental Farm, South Africa) helped in climbing trees to collect leaves and fruit samples; (iv) Mr. Joseph Lethabo and Mr. Abraham (Drivers, High Performance Centre, Hillcrest Campus, University of Pretoria, South Africa) helped in driving us to and fro plant collection sites; (v) Dr. Kenneth Oberlander (HGWJ Schweickerdt Herbarium, University of Pretoria, South Africa) scientifically identified the plant voucher specimen; and (vi) Mr. William (Phytomedicine Programme, University of Pretoria) helped in grinding all plant samples for laboratory analyses.

References

  1. N. A. Punchard, C. J. Whelan, and I. Adcock, Journal of Inflammation, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2004. View at: Publisher Site
  2. F. Conforti, S. Sosa, M. Marrelli et al., “In vivo anti-inflammatory and in vitro antioxidant activities of Mediterranean dietary plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Brand-Williams, M. E. Cuvelier, and C. Berset, “Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity,” LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. O. Radmark and B. Samuelsson, “5-Lipoxygenase: mechanism of regulation,” The Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, pp. 40–45, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. S. Nworu and P. A. Akah, “Anti-inflammatory medicinal plants and the molecular mechanisms underlying their activities,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 52–61, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Cuzzocrea, D. P. Riley, A. P. Caputi, and D. Salvemini, “Antioxidant therapy: a new pharmacological approach in shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 135–159, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Newton, “Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid action: what is important?” Thorax, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 603–613, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. A. O’Leary, S. de Pascual-Tereasade, P. W. Needs, Y. P. Bao, N. M. O’Brien, and G. Williamson, “Effect of flavonoids and Vitamin E on cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-II) transcription,” Mutation Research, vol. 551, no. 1-2, pp. 245–254, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  9. I. Y. Adam and I. A. Alhameed, “Kigelia africana fruits extracts anti hepato-toxic effects on male wistar rats liver destruction induced by CCL4,” Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. Chih-Cheng, C. Lu-Te, W. Yuan-Chen et al., “Polyphenol and antioxidant content of Kigelia africana leaves from Ghana,” Food, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Lamorde, J. R. S. Tabuti, C. Obua et al., “Medicinal plants used by traditional medicine practitioners for the treatment of HIV/AIDS and related conditions in Uganda,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Hussain, K. F. Fatima, M. Rafay, S. Shabir, M. Akram, and S. Bano, “Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activity of leaves, fruit and bark of Kigelia africana,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 277–283, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  13. F. Ursini, M. Maiorino, P. Morazzoni, A. Roveri, and G. Pifferi, “A novel antioxidant flavonoid (IdB 1031) affecting molecular mechanisms of cellular activation,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 547–553, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Akintunde, D. Akintunde, E. Irondi, K. Babaita, R. Labaika, and O. Sunday, “Antioxidants from stem bark of Kigelia africana inhibits free radicals and membrane lipid damage in rat testes in vitro,” Oxidants and Antioxidants in Medical Science, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 63, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Namita, R. Mukesh, and K. Tirath, “Evaluation of anti-inflammatory potential of Kigelia pinnata leaf extract in wistar rats,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 95–97, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Arkhipov, J. Shalom, B. Matthews, and I. E. Ian Edwin Cock, “Metabolomic profiling of Kigelia africana extracts with anti-cancer activity by high resolution tandem mass spectroscopy,” Pharmacognosy Communications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 10–32, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. WCSP (World Checklist of Selected Plant Families), World Checklist of Selected Plant Families, Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, 2020.
  18. M. Vijayasanthi, A. Doss, and K. V. Kannan, “Anti-inflammatory activity of Spathodea campanulata P. Beauv. leaves against carrageenan induced paw edema,” Bio Technology-Elixir International Journal, vol. 78, pp. 29450–29452, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  19. B.-E. Van Wyk, H. de Wet, and F. R. Van Heerden, “An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in the Southeastern Karoo, South Africa,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 696–704, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. O. J. Owolabi and K. I. E. Omogbai, “Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory activities of the ethanolic stem bark extract of Kigelia africana (Bignoniaceae),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 582585, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, and C. Rice-Evans, “Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation de-colourization assay,” Free Radical Biological Medicine, vol. 26, no. 9-10, pp. 1231–1237, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. J. Gaffney, “Lipoxygenases: structural principles and spectroscopy,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 431–459, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Z. Hodzic, H. Pasalic, A. Memisevic, M. Srabovic, M. Saletovic, and M. Poljakovic, “The influence of total phenols content on antioxidant capacity in the whole grain extracts,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 28, pp. 471–477, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. O. Olugbami, M. A. Gbadegesin, and O. A. Odunola, “In vitro evaluation of the antioxidant potential, phenolic and flavonoid contents of the stem bark ethanol extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus,” African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 43, no. Suppl 1, pp. 1–109, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  26. V. Dhriti, P. V. Chowdary, J. Rahul, G. Vishank, and B. B. Shivaji, “Free radical scavenging and anti-diabetic activity of Kigelia pinnata,” World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 1249–1262, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Lugas, J. Hovari, K. V. Sagi, and L. Bíro, “The role of antioxidant phytonutrients in the prevention of diseases,” Acta Biologica Szegediensis, vol. 47, no. 1–4, pp. 119–125, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  28. I. M. Ahmad, M. Y. Abdalla, N. H. Mustafa, E. Y. Qnais, and F. A. Abdulla, “Datura aqueous leaf extract enhances cytotoxicity via metabolic oxidative stress on different human cancer cells,” Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 2, no. 9, p. 1, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. E. Bizimenyera, “The potential role of antibacterial, antioxidant and antiparasitic activity of Peltophorum africanum Sond (Fabaceae) extracts in the ethnoveterinary medicine,” University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2007, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
  30. E. Mongelli, C. Desmarchelier, J. Rodríguez Talou, J. Coussio, and G. Ciccia, “In vitro antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of extracts of Baccharis coridifolia DC,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Ponnan, R. Perumal, T. S. Sathiyavedu, and R. Arabandi, “Antioxidant activity measured in different solvent fractions obtained from Mentha spicata Linn.: an analysis by ABTS decolorization assay,” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, pp. 119–124, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  32. B. D’Abrosca, M. DellaGreca, A. Fiorentino, P. Monaco, A. Natale, and P. Oriano, “Structural characterization of phytotoxic terpenoids from Cestrum parqui,” Phytochemistry, vol. 66, no. 22, pp. 2681–2688, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  33. B. D’Abrosca, M. DellaGreca, A. Fiorentino, P. Monaco, and A. Zarrelli, “Low molecular weight phenols from the bioactive aqueous fraction of Cestrum parqui,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 4101–4108, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Della Greca, A. Fiorentino, P. Monaco, L. Previtera, and A. Zarrelli, “Effusides I-V: 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene glucosides from Juncus effusus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 533–535, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Olubunmi, G. Olatunji, A. Oluyomi, S. Oluremi, S. Fayemi, and S. O. Fayemi, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of cuticular wax from Kigelia africana,” Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 34, no. 4, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  36. I. Schneider and F. Bucar, “Lipoxygenase inhibitors from natural plant sources. Part 1: medicinal plants with inhibitory activity on arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase[sol ]cyclooxygenase,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 81–102, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. O. Tacar, P. Sriamornsak, and C. R. Dass, “Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. Mollace, C. Muscoli, E. Masini, S. Cuzzocrea, and D. Salvemini, “Modulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by nitric oxide and nitric oxide donors,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 217–252, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. C. Venema, H. Ju, R. Zou, J. W. Ryan, and V. J. Venema, “Subunit interactions of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 1276–1282, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C.-J. Lee, L.-G. Chen, W.-L. Liang, and C.-C. Wang, “Anti-inflammatory effects of Punica granatum Linne in vitro and in vivo,” Food Chemistry, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 315–322, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Arulselvan, M. T. Fard, W. S. Tan et al., “Role of antioxidants and natural products in inflammation,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 5276130, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  42. R. W. McMurray and K. J. Hardy, “COX-2 inhibitors: today and tomorrow,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 323, no. 4, pp. 181–189, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. N. Cronstein, “Cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors: translating pharmacology into clinical utility,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 69, pp. 13–19, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. Needleman and P. Isakson, “The discovery and function of COX-2,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 24, pp. 6–8, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. M. Cowan, “Plant products as antimicrobial agents,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 564–582, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. I. M. S. Eldeen and J. Van Staden, “Cyclooxygenase inhibition and antimycobacterial effects of extracts from Sudanese medicinal plants,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 225–229, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. D. Coy-Barrera and L. E. Cuca-Suarez, “In vitro anti-inflammatory effects of naturally-occurring compounds from two lauraceae plants,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1397–1402, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. N. Su, W. P. Jones, M. Cuendet et al., “Constituents of the stems of Macrococculus pomiferus and their inhibitory activities against cyclooxygenases-1 and -2,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 2861–2866, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. O. Choi, W. Y. Kim, J. S. Kang et al., “Two enzymes in one; two yeast peroxiredoxins display oxidative stress-dependent switching from a peroxidase to a molecular chaperone function,” Cell, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 625–635, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  50. R. A. Momin, D. L. De Witt, and M. G. Nair, “Inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes by compounds from Daucus carota L. seeds,” Phototherapeutic Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 976–979, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Schulte, J. Bernhagen, and R. Bucala, “Cytokines in sepsis: potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets—an updated view,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2013, Article ID 165974, 16 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Tanabe, R. Matsushima-Nishiwaki, S. Yamaguchi, H. Iida, S. Dohi, and O. Kozawa, “Mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor-α-induced interleukin-6 synthesis in glioma cells,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 16, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Zdanov, C. Schalk-Hihi, and A. Wlodawer, “Crystal structure of human interleukin-10 at 1.6 Å resolution and model of a complex with its soluble receptor,” Protein Science Journal, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1955–1962, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Narasimha, J. Watanabe, J. Linc et al., “A novel anti-atherogenic role for COX-2—potential mechanism for the cardiovascular side effects of COX-2 inhibitors,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 24–33, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. Picerno, G. Autore, S. Marzocco, M. Meloni, R. Sanogo, and R. P. Aquino, “Anti-inflammatory activity of Verminoside from Kigelia africana and evaluation of cuteneous irritation in cell cultures and reconstituted human epidermis,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 68, pp. 1610–1614, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  56. M. W. Carey, N. V. Rao, B. R. Kumar, and G. K. Mohan, “Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of methanolic extract of Kigelia pinnata DC flower,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 130, pp. 179–182, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  57. W. M. Carey, D. Jeevan Mani Babu, N. Venkat Rao, and G. Krishna Mohan, “Anti-inflammatory activity of the fruit of Kigelia pinnata DC,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 2, pp. 234–245, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. W. Hassan, M. G. M. Abubakar, R. A. Umar, A. S. Yakubu, H. M. Maishanu, and G. Ayeni, “Pharmacological and toxicological properties of leaf extracts of Kigelia africana (Bignoniaceae),” Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 6, pp. 124–132, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. Srivastava, V. K. Lal, and K. K. Pant, “Polyherbal formulations based on Indian medicinal plants as antidiabetic phytotherapeutics,” Phytopharmacology, vol. 2, pp. 1–15, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  60. M. Spinella, “The importance of pharmacological synergy in psychoactive herbal medicines,” Alternative Medicine Reviews, vol. 7, pp. 130–137, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  61. M. S. Chorgade, Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 2, John Wiley and Sons Inc, Drug Development, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.
  62. J. Dai and R. J. Mumper, “Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 7313–7352, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Alice Nabatanzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2941
Downloads505
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.