A Placebo-Controlled Study on the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome of Qi Stagnation and Dampness Obstruction Related to Atypical Antipsychotics with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)
Table 4
Comparison of PANSS between two groups.
Study
Control
t
PS
BT
18.42
±
6.63
16.04
±
4.69
2.58
0.01
1st ME
15.26
±
4.99
14.71
±
4.44
0.70
0.49
2nd ME
13.30
±
4.52
13.71
±
4.19
−0.56
0.58
3rd ME
11.82
±
4.10
13.17
±
4.38
−1.85
0.07
NS
BT
20.06
±
7.77
21.69
±
7.16
−1.30
0.20
1st ME
18.24
±
7.16
20.98
±
6.95
−2.29
0.02
2nd ME
16.83
±
7.07
19.85
±
6.75
−2.58
0.01
3rd ME
16.25
±
9.92
19.62
±
6.88
−2.45
0.02
GS
BT
34.34
±
9.76
32.52
±
6.46
1.38
0.17
1st ME
29.22
±
7.18
30.21
±
5.34
−0.97
0.34
2nd ME
27.05
±
6.58
29.71
±
5.45
−2.66
0.01
3rd ME
24.34
±
5.78
28.65
±
5.32
−4.61
0.00
PANSS
BT
72.82
±
19.18
70.25
±
12.68
0.99
0.32
1st ME
62.79
±
14.40
65.90
±
12.65
−1.37
0.17
2nd ME
57.33
±
13.83
63.27
±
13.07
−2.61
0.01
3rd ME
52.40
±
15.23
61.44
±
13.33
−3.79
0.00
PANSS = positive and negative symptom scale; PS = positive symptom; NS = negative symptom; GS = general symptom; BT = before treatment; and ME = month end.