Research Article

A Placebo-Controlled Study on the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome of Qi Stagnation and Dampness Obstruction Related to Atypical Antipsychotics with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)

Table 4

Comparison of PANSS between two groups.

StudyControlt

PSBT18.42±6.6316.04±4.692.580.01
1st ME15.26±4.9914.71±4.440.700.49
2nd ME13.30±4.5213.71±4.19−0.560.58
3rd ME11.82±4.1013.17±4.38−1.850.07

NSBT20.06±7.7721.69±7.16−1.300.20
1st ME18.24±7.1620.98±6.95−2.290.02
2nd ME16.83±7.0719.85±6.75−2.580.01
3rd ME16.25±9.9219.62±6.88−2.450.02

GSBT34.34±9.7632.52±6.461.380.17
1st ME29.22±7.1830.21±5.34−0.970.34
2nd ME27.05±6.5829.71±5.45−2.660.01
3rd ME24.34±5.7828.65±5.32−4.610.00

PANSSBT72.82±19.1870.25±12.680.990.32
1st ME62.79±14.4065.90±12.65−1.370.17
2nd ME57.33±13.8363.27±13.07−2.610.01
3rd ME52.40±15.2361.44±13.33−3.790.00

PANSS = positive and negative symptom scale; PS = positive symptom; NS = negative symptom; GS = general symptom; BT = before treatment; and ME = month end.