Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 5679408 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5679408

Mohammed S. Ali-Shtayeh, Salam Y. Abu-Zaitoun, Nativ Dudai, Rana M. Jamous, "Downy Lavender Oil: A Promising Source of Antimicrobial, Antiobesity, and Anti-Alzheimer’s Disease Agents", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 5679408, 10 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5679408

Downy Lavender Oil: A Promising Source of Antimicrobial, Antiobesity, and Anti-Alzheimer’s Disease Agents

Academic Editor: Attila Hunyadi
Received22 Oct 2019
Accepted16 Jan 2020
Published07 Feb 2020


Lavandula pubescens Decne (LP) is one of the three Lavandula species growing wildly in the Dead Sea Valley, Palestine. The products derived from the plant, including the essential oil (EO), have been used in Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine (TAPHM) for centuries as therapeutic agents. The EO is traditionally believed to have sedative, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, antidepressive, antiamnesia, and antiobesity properties. This study was therefore aimed to assess the in vitro bioactivities associated with the LP EO. The EO was separated by hydrodistillation from the aerial parts of LP plants and analyzed for its antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticholinesterase, and antilipase activities. GC-MS was used for phytochemical analysis. The chemical analysis of the EO composition revealed 25 constituents, of which carvacrol (65.27%) was the most abundant. EO exhibited strong antioxidant (IC50 0.16–0.18 μL/mL), antiacetylcholinesterase (IC50 0.9 μL/mL), antibutyrylcholinesterase (IC50 6.82 μL/mL), and antilipase (IC50 1.08 μL/mL) effects. The EO also demonstrated high antibacterial activity with the highest susceptibility observed for Staphylococcus aureus with 95.7% inhibition. The EO was shown to exhibit strong inhibitory activity against Candida albicans (MIC 0.47 μL/mL). The EO was also shown to possess strong antidermatophyte activity against Microsporum canis, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and Epidermophyton floccosum (EC50 0.05–0.06 μL/mL). The high antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory, and antimicrobial potentials of the EO can, therefore, be correlated with its high content of monoterpenes, especially carvacrol, as shown by its comparable bioactivities indicators results. This study provided new insights into the composition and bioactivities of LP EO. Our finding revealed evidence that LP EO makes a valuable natural source of bioactive molecules showing substantial potential as antioxidant, neuroprotective, antihyperlipidemic, and antimicrobial agents. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that LP EO might be useful for further investigation aiming at integrative CAM and clinical applications in the management of dermatophytosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and obesity.

1. Introduction

The genus Lavandula (Lamiaceae), lavender, is a typical aromatic evergreen understory chamaephyte that comprises about 32 species [1], some of them being utilized in complementary and alternative medicine for a long time, either dried or as essential oils (EOs). Three native Lavandula species are growing wild in Palestine (West Bank and Gaza Strip), namely, L. pubescens Decne (Downy lavender), L. stoechas L. (French lavender), and L. coronopifolia Poir. (Staghorn lavender) [2]. L. pubescens is common in the Dead Sea Valley, Jerusalem, and Hebron Desert and very rare in the Lower Jordan Valley and L. coronopifolia is common only in the Dead Sea Valley and only rare in Jerusalem and Hebron Desert, whereas L. stoechas is rare in Gaza Strip. Many pharmacological properties have been reported for lavender EOs, including local anesthetic, sedative, analgesic, anticonvulsant, antispasmodic [3, 4], cholinesterase inhibitory [5], antioxidant [6, 7], antibacterial, and antifungal effects and inhibition of microbial resistance [6, 8], and they are used for the treatment of inflammation and many neurological disturbances [9]. The oil has also been utilized for relieving anxiety and associated sleep disorders [10], depression, and headache [11]. The EO of Lavandula species is also used widely in pharmaceutical fragrance, food, and household cleaners [1214].

The EO of L. pubescens has been reported to exhibit a strong wide-ranging in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria including Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli [6, 13, 15] and hepatoprotective [16], cytotoxic, and xanthine-oxidase inhibitory activities [6, 8].

The products derived from the Palestinian Downy lavender (L. pubescens) (Arabic, Khuzama), including EO, have been utilized for centuries in Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine (TAPHM) as CAM therapies [17]. The LP EO is traditionally believed to have sedative, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, antidementia, and antiobesity properties and has therefore been utilized for the management of, but not limited to, indigestion, neurological disorders, dementia, obesity, and microbial skin infections [17].

However, no reports are available on the antidermatophytic, anticholinesterase (i.e., anti-Alzheimer’s disease), and antilipase (i.e., antiobesity) effects associated with the EO of L. pubescens.

This study was, therefore, aimed at defining the chemical composition of EO attained from above-ground parts of L. pubescens plants collected from wild populations in the Dead Sea Valley in Palestine, and assessing its potential in vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticholinesterase, and antilipase effects and thus to verify its use as a complementary medicine for the treatment of AD, obesity, and microbial skin infections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Essential Oil Extraction

The aerial parts of fully bloomed Lavandula pubescens were collected from Palestine (Dead Sea Valley) in May 2017 and used for EO extraction. Plants were authenticated by the first author. The voucher specimen (Lavandula pubescens Decne, Voucher No. BERC-BX603) has been deposited at BERC Herbarium, Til, Nablus, Palestine. 250 gm of the fresh above-ground plant parts were subjected to hydrodistillation using a modified Clevenger apparatus until there was no significant increase in the amount of EO collected [18].

2.2. GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was performed to determine the EO composition by using the conditions reported by Ali-Shtayeh et al. [18]. Identification of the compounds was performed by comparing their relative retention indices (RI) with those of authentic compounds (e.g., carvacrol, terpinolene, ε-caryophyllene, and β-bisabolene) or by comparing their mass spectral fragmentation patterns with Wiley 7 MS library (Wiley, New York, NY, USA) and NIST98 (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) mass spectral database. The identified components along with their RI values and percentage composition are summarized in Table 1.

Nu.Ret timeRICompound nameArea %

1814.1581241Carvacrol methyl ether5.36
2523.3871582Caryophyllene oxide1.11

2.3. Antioxidant Activity Evaluation

Antioxidant properties of the EO from L. pubescens were evaluated by using the following methods: the 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzo thiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) ABTS radical cation decolorization and reductive potential (RP) assays as reported previously [19, 20]. Trolox, ascorbic acid, and BHT were used as standard antioxidants.

2.4. Enzymatic Inhibitory Activities

The essential oils of L. pubescens and carvacrol were investigated for their enzyme inhibitory properties on acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), and porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL) following previously reported spectrophotometric methods [21, 22]. Neostigmine was used as a reference compound for AChE and BuChE enzymes, and orlistat was used for PPL enzyme.

The effects of different doses of test compounds (LP essential oil, carvacrol and reference compounds) on the AChE, BuChE, and PPL activities were used to calculate the IC50 values from dose-effect curves by linear regression.

2.5. Microbiological Assays

Microorganisms used in this study are presented in Table 2.

MicroorganismsSpecies nameSourceNotes

BacteriaStaphylococcus aureusATCC 25923Gram positive
Proteus vulgarisATCC 13315Gram negative
Pseudomonas aeruginosaATCC 27853
Salmonella typhiATCC 14028
Escherichia coliATCC 25922
Klebsiella pneumoniaATCC 13883

CandidaCandida albicansCBS6589
BERC M77Clinical isolates (vulvovaginal and cutaneous candidiasis patients)

DermatophytesMicrosporum canisCBS 132.88
BERC MC03Clinical isolates (dermatophytosis patients)
Trichophyton rubrumBERC CBS 392.58
BERC TR64Clinical isolates (dermatophytosis patients)
Trichophyton mentagrophytesCBS 106.67
BERC TM1Clinical isolates (dermatophytosis patients)
Epidermophyton floccosumCBS 358.93

2.5.1. Agar Disc Diffusion Assay

This method was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of the EO and carvacrol against Candida albicans and bacterial strains as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [23]. The inhibition zone diameter for each sample was measured in mm and used to calculate the antibacterial and anticandidal activity index (AI) and % of inhibition (PI) at a concentration of 1 μL/disc using the following formulas [24]:

All experiments were done in triplicate. Chloramphenicol and voriconazole were used as positive controls for bacteria and candida, respectively.

2.5.2. Broth Microdilution Assay

The broth microdilution technique with some modifications was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the EO against bacteria and C. albicans strains [2527]. Chloramphenicol (1 to 64 μg/mL) and voriconazole (0.019 to 1.25 μg/mL) were used as reference antibiotics for bacteria and Candida, respectively.

2.5.3. Determination of Antidermatophytic Activity: Poisoned-Food Technique

Essential oils from L. pubescens and carvacrol were tested for their antidermatophyte activity against four dermatophytes species: Microsporum canis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Epidermophyton floccosum, and Trichophyton rubrum (Table 2) using the modified poisoned-food technique [28]. EO and carvacrol were tested at different concentrations (0.5–0.0039 mL/L). Mycelial growth inhibition % (PI) was calculated as follows:where DC is the average diameter of mycelial growth of the control, and DT is the average diameter of mycelial growth of the treatment. Effective concentration fifty (EC50) that caused 50% growth inhibition was estimated using Microsoft Excel 2010 under Windows 10.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) were assessed following the previously reported assays [29, 30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. GC-MS Analysis

There are no reports on the EO composition of L. pubescens growing wild in Palestine and only a few such reports are available worldwide [6, 8, 13, 31]. Hydrodistillation of the L. pubescens leaves yielded 1.9 mL per 250 g fresh plant material.

The GC-MS analysis of the EO led to the identification of 25 components (Table 1). The main identified compounds were carvacrol (65.27%), β-bisabolene (7.43%), ε-caryophyllene (6.21%), carvacrol methyl ether (5.36%), terpinolene (5.34%), Z-β-ocimene (2.63%), myrcene (2.05%), para-menth-1-en-9-ol (1.73%), and caryophyllene oxide (1.11%), representing 97.13% of the total oil. Hence, the EO from the Palestinian L. pubescens can be characterized as carvacrol chemotype. The oxygenated monoterpenes were the dominant (73.26%) chemical group within the constituents, followed by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (13.84%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (11.79%), and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (1.11%). The EO chemical profile in this study is qualitatively comparable to that formerly reported from Yemen where the EO has shown to be carvacrol chemotype (60.9–77.5%) [6, 31].

Carvacrol is a monoterpenic phenol that is biosynthesized from γ-terpinene [32] through p-cymene [33]. These two compounds are therefore present in the L. pubescens EO. Biosynthetic intermediates such as terpinene-4-ol [34] and p-cymen-8-ol [35] are also present [36].

3.2. Antioxidant Potential

The antioxidant activity of EOs is a biological property of great interest because the oils that possess the ability of scavenging free radicals may play an important role in the prevention of some diseases that may result from oxidative stress damages caused by the free radicals, such as brain dysfunction, Alzheimer’s disease, obesity, cancer, heart disease, and immune system decline [3739]. The consumption of naturally occurring antioxidants that can be used to protect human beings from oxidative stress damages has therefore been increased [38]. This work reports the antioxidant activities of L. pubescens EO as assessed by ABTS and RP assays (Table 3).

ABTSReductive potential

Oil0.18 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.0
Carvacrol0.03 ± 0.00.07 ± 0.0

Standard antioxidants IC50(mg/ml)
Trolox0.05 ± 0.00.08 ± 0.0
Ascorbic acid0.05 ± 0.00.04 ± 0.0
BHT0.03 ± 0.00.07 ± 0.01

The antioxidant potential of LP EO was generally high with RP50 and IC50 of 0.16 and 0.18 μL/mL using RP and ABTS assays, respectively. Interestingly, carvacrol has shown comparable antioxidant activity (IC50 = 0.03 μL/mL) relative to the potent antioxidant agent BHT using the ABTS assay and high antioxidant capacity (RP50 = 0.07 μL/mL) comparable to the tested potent antioxidant agents (Trolox and BHT) (Table 3).

The antioxidant capacities of L. pubescens EO may be attributed to the high content of the oil’s major phenolic constituents, especially carvacrol, which were confirmed as effective antioxidant compounds with potential health benefits [40]. Our results demonstrate that the EOs of L. pubescens and carvacrol have a significant strength to provide electrons to reactive oxygen species (ROS), converting them into more stable nonreactive species and ending the free ROS chain reaction.

3.3. Antibacterial Activity

Results for the in vitro antibacterial activity of L. pubescens EO and carvacrol are presented in Figures 1 and 2 as PI and MIC. The EO and carvacrol had similar high antibacterial activities against all bacteria tested with a PI range of 37.2–95.7% and MIC range of 0.2–0.7 μL/mL. Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) was the most susceptible strain (PI value 95.7% for EO and 87% for carvacrol). Among the tested Gram-negative bacterial strains, the EO has comparable inhibition effect with PI values 46.5, 49.8, 51.1, 51.3, and 49.6% against Salmonella typhi, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, and K. pneumonia, respectively.

The strong antibacterial activity of the EO may be ascribed to the presence of high % of oxygenated monoterpenes (73.26%) such as carvacrol (65.27%), which was found to destroy cell morphology and biofilm viability in typical biofilm construction by increasing the permeability and reducing polarization of the cytoplasmic membrane [4143]. The antibacterial activity of carvacrol has been mainly attributed to its hydrophobicity and the free hydroxyl group in its structure [44]. With the appropriate hydrophobicity of carvacrol, the compound can be accumulated in the cell membrane, while its hydrogen-bonding and its proton-release abilities may induce conformational modification of the membrane resulting in cell death [45]. Our results can, therefore, explain the association of the use of the LP EO in TAPHM as an antiseptic, due to the antibacterial action of carvacrol which has been previously confirmed [46, 47].

3.4. Anticandidal Activity

Candidiasis is a mycotic infection caused by several species of Candida, which can endorse superficial and systemic opportunist diseases worldwide. The current treatment against candidiasis is based on synthetic antimycotic drugs. Most presently available anticandidal drugs have limitations that hamper their use, which necessitates the search for safe and effective antimycotic agents.

The results of this study showed that the EO and carvacrol possessed strong inhibitory activity against C. albicans (isolated from cutaneous and vulvovaginal infections) with average PI values of 103.4% for EO and 113.6% for carvacrol (Figure 1) and MIC values of 0.47 and 0.24 μL/mL for EO and carvacrol, respectively (Figure 2). The strong anticandidal activity of EO can, therefore, be correlated with its high content of carvacrol owing to the anticandidal activity of carvacrol which has been previously confirmed [48].

3.5. Antidermatophytic Activity

Aromatic plants EOs are known to be mycostatic or fungicidal and represent a potential source of new antimycotics [49]. In view of the increasing resistance to the classical antimycotics, the EOs and their active constituents may be beneficial in the management of mycoses, especially dermatophytosis [50]. In the present study, the L. pubescens EO showed strong activity against M. canis, T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, and E. floccosum as indicated by their PI, MIC, MFC, and EC50 values (Figure 3).

The EO of L. pubescens and carvacrol showed a dose-dependent activity against the tested dermatophytes (Figure 4). Overall, as the dose of the EO or carvacrol increased, the inhibitory activity against the tested dermatophytes increased indicated by heightened mycelial growth inhibition. The radial mycelial growth of all tested isolates was completely inhibited by the EO and carvacrol at 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 μL/mL concentration. However, at lower doses (0.004–0.063 μL/mL), the EO was still more active on the mycelial growth of T. mentagrophytes than other tested dermatophytes at 0.63 μL/mL, PI = 89.7% (Figure 3).

The MIC and EC50 values of the EO of L. pubescens on the tested dermatophytes were in the ranges of 0.08–0.16 μL/mL and 0.05–0.06 μL/mL, respectively. However, EO showed a fungicidal effect on the four studied dermatophytes and the MFCs were in the range of 0.16–0.25 μL/mL. T. mentagrophytes were more susceptible to L. pubescens EO than the other tested fungi with MIC, MFC, and EC50 values of 0.05, 0.08, and 0.16 μL/mL, respectively.

The strong antifungal property could be attributed to the major component of the EOs, carvacrol, and the oxygenated monoterpene, which exhibited strong inhibitory activity against the tested dermatophytes (Figure 3) with PI, MIC, EC50, and MFC values ranging from 76.7 to 100%, 0.063–0.125 μL/mL, 0.01–0.1 μL/mL, and 0.03–0.63 μL/mL, respectively. The monoterpene alcohols are water soluble and possess functional alcohol groups that explain their strong antidermatophyte activity [49].

In general, EO and carvacrol can exert their antidermatophyte actions due to membrane damage, cytoplasmic content leakage, and ergosterol depletion [49, 5153].

3.6. Enzyme Inhibitory Activities of Essential Oil
3.6.1. Anticholinesterase Activity

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have recently become the most widely used drugs for the management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [54]. ChEIs play a crucial role in the memory enhancement of AD patients through increasing ACh concentration in neural synaptic clefts and thus improving the brain cholinergic transmission and decreasing β-amyloid aggregation and neurotoxic fibrils formation [5557]. However, synthetic AChEIs including galanthamine and tacrine have restrictions owing to the short half-life and adverse side effects such as digestive disorders, nausea, and dizziness [58, 59]. Hence, it is necessary to explore new safe alternatives with superior characteristics to deal with AD.

Several plants and phytochemical compounds have revealed cholinesterase inhibitory capacity and therefore can be valuable in the management of neurological disturbances [21]. In this study, LP EO was investigated for its in vitro cholinesterases (AChE and BuChE) inhibitory activities. The EO and carvacrol have shown to possess high AChE (IC50 = 0.9, and 1.43 μL/mL, respectively) and medium BuChE (IC50 6.82, and 7.75 μL/mL, respectively) inhibitory activities (Table 4).

IC50 (μL/mL)Selectivity index (SI)

Oil0.9 ± 0.146.82 ± 0.357.58 ± 0.13
Carvacrol1.43 ± 0.567.75 ± 0.255.42 ± 0. 01
Neostagmin (μg/mL)1.54 ± 0.00174.41 ± 0.00113.18 ± 0.00

SI = IC50 BuChE/IC50 AChE.

Thus, the high AChE inhibitory effect of the L. pubescens EO in the current study may be mainly associated with its major component, carvacrol, and with its high phenol content. Overall, the tested EO was shown to be more selective inhibitors for acetylcholinesterase than butyrylcholinesterase with a selectivity index (SI) of 7.58.

Our results demonstrate that LP EO could be a valued natural source of AChEIs, e.g., carvacrol, with effective inhibitory activities against the principal enzymes associated with AD and could signify a basis for developing a new treatment strategy for Alzheimer’s using plant-derived AChEIs.

3.6.2. Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Activity

Pancreatic lipase, the principal enzyme associated with obesity, plays a key role in the efficient digestion of acylglycerols [60]. The hydrolysis of glycerides to glycerol and free fatty acids is performed by lipases. Taking into consideration that 50–70% of the total dietary fat hydrolysis is performed by pancreatic lipase, enzyme inhibition is one of the approaches used to treat obesity [60]. The mechanism involves inhibition of dietary triglyceride absorption, as this is the main source of excess calories [61]. Besides, pancreatic lipase inhibition does not alter any central mechanism, which makes it an ideal approach for obesity treatment [62]. The pancreatic lipase has been widely used for the determination of the potential efficacy of natural products as antiobesity agents [62].

In the present study, L. pubescens EO and carvacrol were assessed for their activity against pancreatic lipase. The EO exhibited high inhibitory activity against PPL with IC50 of 1.08 μL/mL (Table 5). The high antiobesity activity of L. pubescens EO may be mainly ascribed to its high content of carvacrol which has been reported to inhibit visceral adipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation in animal cells and decrease body weight and plasma lipid levels [63, 64]. However, carvacrol on its own cannot explain the high activity of EO, and therefore the totality of constituents of the EO may act synergistically to exert such high antiobesity activity. The higher pancreatic lipase inhibitory effects of L. pubescens EO may, therefore, be attributed to its high content of bioactive phenolic acids and flavonoids acting together in a synergistic style [22].

IC50 (μL/mL)

Oil1.08 ± 0.35
Carvacrol6.63 ± 1.03
Orlistat (μg/ml)0. 12 ± 0.03

The current study has indicated the ability of the EO to exercise health benefit attributes by inhibiting the pancreatic lipase enzyme (responsible for digestion and absorption of triglycerides) and thus lead to the reduction of fat absorption.

4. Conclusions

The main constituent of L. pubescens EO was determined as carvacrol in wild plants. The results demonstrate that the plant is a valuable natural source for carvacrol-rich EO with promising potential antimicrobial, antiobesity, and anti-AD health effects (Figure 5). Our results support the use of L. pubescens EO as a natural complementary treatment in TAPHM. This is the first report on the antidermatophytic, AChE inhibitory, and antiobesity effects of L. pubescens EO. In conclusion, our results might be useful for further investigation aiming at clinical applications of L. pubescens EO and carvacrol in the management of AD, obesity, and microbial skin infections including dermatophytosis, candidiasis, and others.


ABTS:2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzo thiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)
AD:Alzheimer’s disease
AI:Activity index
BERC:Biodiversity and environmental research center
CLSI:Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
EC50:Effective concentration fifty
EO:Essential oil
GC-MS:Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
IC50:Inhibitory concentration fifty
MFC:Minimum fungicidal concentration
MIC:Minimum inhibitory concentration
PI:Percent of inhibition
PPL:Porcine pancreatic lipase
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
RP:Reductive potential
TAPHM:Traditional Arabic Palestinian herbal medicine.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


This research was partially funded by the Middle East Regional Cooperation (MERC) project M36-010 (award number: SIS700 15G360 10).


  1. M. Lis-Balchin, Lavender: The Genus Lavandula, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002.
  2. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh and R. M. Jamous, “Updating the plant “red list” of Palestine (West Bank and Gaza Strip): conservation assessment and recommendations,” Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  3. J. Lehrner, G. Marwinski, S. Lehr, P. Johren, and L. Deecke, “Ambient odors of orange and lavender reduce anxiety and improve mood in a dental office,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 86, no. 1-2, pp. 92–95, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. W.-K. Lin, W.-C. Chan, B. F.-L. Ng, and L. C.-W. Lam, “Efficacy of aromatherapy (Lavandula angustifolia) as an intervention for agitated behaviours in Chinese older persons with dementia: a cross-over randomized trial,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 405–410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Adsersen, B. Gauguin, L. Gudiksen, and A. K. Jäger, “Screening of plants used in Danish folk medicine to treat memory dysfunction for acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 418–422, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. N. Al-Badani, J. K. R. da Silva, I. Mansi, B. A. Muharam, W. N. Setzer, and N. A. Awadh Ali, “Chemical composition and biological activity of Lavandula pubescens essential oil from Yemen,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 509–515, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Baptista, A. M. Madureira, R. Jorge et al., “Antioxidant and antimycotic activities of two native Lavandula species from Portugal,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 570521, 10 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Gouda, O. Mousa, M. Salama, and H. Kassem, “Volatiles and lipoidal composition: antimicrobial activity of flowering aerial parts of Lavandula pubescens Decne,” International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research, vol. 9, no. 8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. H. Koulivand, M. Khaleghi Ghadiri, and A. Gorji, “Lavender and the nervous system,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 681304, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Kasper, M. Gastpar, W. E. Müller et al., “Silexan, an orally administered Lavandula oil preparation, is effective in the treatment of “subsyndromal” anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial,” International Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 277–287, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. Hajhashemi, A. Ghannadi, and B. Sharif, “Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of the leaf extracts and essential oil of Lavandula angustifolia mill,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N.-S. Kim and D.-S. Lee, “Comparison of different extraction methods for the analysis of fragrances from Lavandula species by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 982, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. H. Park, Y. E. Park, H. J. Yeo et al., “Chemical compositions of the volatile oils and antibacterial screening of solvent extract from downy lavender,” Foods, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 132, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. S. Sarker, M. Galata, Z. A. Demissie, and S. S. Mahmoud, “Molecular cloning and functional characterization of borneol dehydrogenase from the glandular trichomes of Lavandula x intermedia,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 528, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Hamada, L. Segni, M. B. Goudjil, S.-E. Benchiekh, and N. Gherraf, “Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Lavandula pubescens Decne essential oil from algeria,” International Journal of Biosciences (IJB), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 187–192, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. O. Mousa, B. Gouda, M. Salama, H. Kassem, and W. El-Eraky, “Total phenolic, total flavonoid content, two isolates and bioactivity of Lavandula pubescens Decne,” International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 254–263, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh and R. M. Jamous, Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine, TAPHM, Biodiversity and Environmental Research Center BERC, Til, Nablus, Palestinian, 2008.
  18. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, R. M. Jamous, S. Y. Abu-Zaitoun et al., “Chemical profile and bioactive properties of the essential oil isolated from Clinopodium serpyllifolium (m.bieb.) kuntze growing in Palestine,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 124, pp. 617–625, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. C. F. R. Ferreira, P. Baptista, M. Vilas-Boas, and L. Barros, “Free-radical scavenging capacity and reducing power of wild edible mushrooms from northeast Portugal: individual cap and stipe activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1511–1516, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, and C. Rice-Evans, “Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 26, no. 9-10, pp. 1231–1237, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. S. Ali-shtayeh, R. M. Jamous, S. Y. Abu Zaitoun, and I. B. Qasem, “In-vitro screening of acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of extracts from Palestinian indigenous flora in relation to the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease,” Functional Foods in Health and Disease, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 381–400, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. M. Jamous, S. Y. Abu-Zaitoun, R. J. Akkawi, and M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, “Antiobesity and antioxidant potentials of selected palestinian medicinal plants,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2018, Article ID 8426752, p. 21, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), in Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne, PA, USA, 2013.
  24. J. Ibumeh, H. O. Egharevba, I. Iliya et al., “Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity of Psidium guajava linn. leaf,” Nature and Science, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 43–50, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Sarikurkcu, G. Zengin, M. Oskay, S. Uysal, R. Ceylan, and A. Aktumsek, “Composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and enzyme inhibition activities of two Origanum vulgare subspecies (subsp. vulgare and subsp. hirtum) essential oils,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 70, pp. 178–184, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, R. M. Jamous, S. Y. Abu-Zaitoun et al., “Secondary treated effluent irrigation did not impact chemical composition, and enzyme inhibition activities of essential oils from Origanum syriacum var. syriacum,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 111, pp. 775–786, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2003.
  28. A. S. O. Mohareb, M. E. I. Badawy, and S. A. M. Abdelgaleil, “Antifungal activity of essential oils isolated from Egyptian plants against wood decay fungi,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 499–505, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. A. Euloge, K. Sandrine, D.-A. Edwige, C. K. S. Dominique, and M. S. Mohamed, “Antifungal activity of Ocimum canum essential oil against toxinogenic fungi isolated from peanut seeds in post-harvest in Benin,” International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 20–26, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. M. Gakuubi, A. W. Maina, and J. M. Wagacha, “Antifungal activity of essential oil of Eucalyptus camaldulensis dehnh. against selected Fusarium spp.,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2017, Article ID 8761610, 7 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. N. Al-Badani, J. K. R. Da Silva, W. N. Setzer et al., “Variations in essential oil compositions of Lavandula pubescens (lamiaceae) aerial parts growing wild in Yemen,” Chemistry and Biodiversity., vol. 14, no. 3, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Davis, R. Mill, and K. Tan, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 10, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK, 1988.
  33. A. Guner, N. Ozhatay, T. Ekim, and K. Baser, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 11, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK, 2000.
  34. N. Kirimer, K. H. C. Başer, and G. Tümen, “Carvacrol-rich plants in Turkey,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. H. C. Baser, N. Kirimer, and G. Tümen, “Composition of the essential oil of Origanum majorana L. from Turkey,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 577–579, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Baser, C. Başer, and F. Demirci, “Chemistry of essential oils,” in Flavours and Fragrances: Chemistry, Bioprospecting and Sustainability, R. Berger, Ed., pp. 43–86, Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. T. Mata, C. Proença, A. R. Ferreira, M. L. M. Serralheiro, J. M. F. Nogueira, and M. E. M. Araújo, “Antioxidant and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of five plants used as Portuguese food spices,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 778–786, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Scalbert, C. Manach, C. Morand, C. Rémésy, and L. Jiménez, “Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 287–306, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. G. Miguel, “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: a short review,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 9252–9287, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. G. Guimarães, G. F. Oliveira, M. S. Melo et al., “Bioassay-guided evaluation of antioxidant and antinociceptive activities of carvacrol,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 949–957, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Nostro and T. Papalia, “Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol: current progress and future prospectives,” Recent Patents on Anti-infective Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. Alagawany, M. El-Hack, M. Farag, R. Tiwari, and K. Dhama, “Biological effects and modes of action of carvacrol in animal and poultry production and health—a review,” Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2s, pp. 73–84, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Nostro, A. Marino, A. R. Blanco et al., “In vitro activity of carvacrol against staphylococcal preformed biofilm by liquid and vapour contact,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 791–797, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Ultee, M. H. J. Bennik, and R. Moezelaar, “The phenolic hydroxyl group of carvacrol is essential for action against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1561–1568, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. B. Arfa, S. Combes, L. Preziosi-Belloy, N. Gontard, and P. Chalier, “Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol related to its chemical structure,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. Lo Cantore, V. Shanmugaiah, and N. S. Iacobellis, “Antibacterial activity of essential oil components and their potential use in seed disinfection,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 20, pp. 9454–9461, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. I. K. Marei, M. A. Abdel Rasoul, and S. A. M. Abdelgaleil, “Comparative antifungal activities and biochemical effects of monoterpenes on plant pathogenic fungi,” Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, M. A. Al-Nuri, R. M.-R. Yaghmour, and Y. R. Faidi, “Antimicrobial activity of Micromeria nervosa from the Palestinian area,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 143–147, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Baindara and S. Korpole, Recent Trends in Antifungal Agents and Antifungal Therapy, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  50. M. Zuzarte, M. J. Gonçalves, C. Cavaleiro, A. M. Dinis, J. M. Canhoto, and L. R. Salgueiro, “Chemical composition and antifungal activity of the essential oils of Lavandula pedunculata (miller) cav,” Chemistry & Biodiversity, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1283–1292, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. S. Chavan and S. G. Tupe, “Antifungal activity and mechanism of action of carvacrol and thymol against vineyard and wine spoilage yeasts,” Food Control, vol. 46, pp. 115–120, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. O. Toncer, S. Karaman, and E. Diraz, “An annual variation in essential oil composition of Origanum syriacum from Southeast Anatolia of Turkey,” Journal of Medical Plants Research, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1059–1064, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Nazzaro, F. Fratianni, R. Coppola, and V. De Feo, “Essential oils and antifungal activity,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. I. E. Orhan, F. S. Senol, M. Z. Haznedaroglu et al., “Neurobiological evaluation of thirty-one medicinal plant extracts using microtiter enzyme assays,” Clinical Phytoscience, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 9, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. Ballard, N. Greig, A. Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. Enz, and S. Darvesh, “Cholinesterases: roles in the brain during health and disease,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 307–318, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. K. Mukherjee, V. Kumar, M. Mal, and P. J. Houghton, “Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants,” Phytomedicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 289–300, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. I. Orhan, B. Şener, M. I. Choudhary, and A. Khalid, “Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of some Turkish medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. N. Wszelaki, A. Kuciun, and A. Kiss, “Screening of traditional European herbal medicines for acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity,” Acta Pharmaceutica, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. M. Park, S. H. Ki, N. R. Han et al., “Tacrine, an oral acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, induced hepatic oxidative damage, which was blocked by liquiritigenin through GSK3-beta inhibition,” Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. E. Lowet, “The triglyceride lipases of the pancreas,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2007–2016, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. B. R. Thomson, A. De Pover, M. Keelan, E. Jarocka-Cyrta, and M. T. Clandinin, “Inhibition of lipid absorption as an approach to the treatment of obesity,” in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 286, pp. 3–44, Elsevier Publisher, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. Shi and P. Burn, “Lipid metabolic enzymes: emerging drug targets for the treatment of obesity,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 695–710, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Cho, Y. Choi, S. Park, and T. Park, “Carvacrol prevents diet-induced obesity by modulating gene expressions involved in adipogenesis and inflammation in mice fed with high-fat diet,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 192–201, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Wieten, R. Van Der Zee, R. Spiering et al., “A novel heat-shock protein coinducer boosts stress protein Hsp70 to activate T cell regulation of inflammation in autoimmune arthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1026–1035, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mohammed S. Ali-Shtayeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.