Review Article
Effectiveness of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 3
Characteristics of included studies (1).
| Study | Year | Country | Study period | Age (years) (mean ± SD) | Gestational age (weeks) (mean ± SD) | T | C | T | C |
| Habek et al. [18] | 2004 | Croatia | — | 20.4 ± 4.7 | 20.8 ± 4.1 | 7 (6–9)∗ | 8 (7–12)∗ | Neri et al. [19] | 2005 | Italy | 2001.5–2002.7 | — | — | — | — | Jin and Hu [29] | 2014 | China | 2009.10–2013.10 | 25.09 ± 3.42 | 26.03 ± 3.19 | 9.03 ± 2.15 | 8.98 ± 2.28 | Ma et al. [30] | 2020 | China | 2013.10–2017.10 | 31.14 ± 4.06 | 31.36 ± 4.24 | 8.64 ± 1.22 | 8.36 ± 1.31 | Wang [31] | 2008 | China | 2005.1–2006.1 | 27 ± 3 | 27 ± 4 | — | — | Ma and Meng [32] | 2013 | China | 2010–2012 | 26.30 | — | — | Zhao and Qiao [33] | 2018 | China | 2015.4–2017.11 | 26 ± 3 | 26 ± 3 | 8.33 ± 1.94 | 8.03 ± 1.63 | Zhang [34] | 2013 | China | 2008.1–2012.12 | 28.58 ± 4.57 | 28.68 ± 3.76 | 8.90 ± 1.66 | 8.97 ± 1.58 | Yan et al. [35] | 2012 | China | 2008.1–2009.6 | 28.09 ± 5.78 | 28.03 ± 6.25 | 9.08 ± 2.44 | 8.95 ± 2.58 | Xu et al. [36] | 2015 | China | 2013.1–2014.10 | (20–35)# | (4–12)# | Sun and Cui [37] | 1995 | China | 1992.1–1994.12 | (22–34)# | — | — | Yang [38] | 2019 | China | 2016.11–2018.11 | 31.56 ± 6.25 | 31.42 ± 6.37 | 8.52 ± 3.62 | 8.86 ± 3.57 | Zhong [39] | 2017 | China | 2015.9–2016.9 | 28.35 ± 2.76 | 27.93 ± 2.47 | — | — | Xie [40] | 2006 | China | 2004.1–2005.5 | 27.25 ± 3.35 | 27.46 ± 3.29 | — | — | Mao and Liang [41] | 2009 | China | 2001.1–2008.12 | 28.23 ± 4.73 | 28.63 ± 4.86 | 8.30 ± 1.60 | 8.33 ± 1.58 | Zhang [42] | 2005 | China | 1999.3 | — | — | — | — |
|
|
Abbreviation: SD: standard deviation; T: treatment group; C: control group; ∗: figures are median and range; #: figures are a range.
|