The Current Strategies in Controlling Oral Diseases by Herbal and Chemical Materials

Abstract

Dental plaque is a biofilm composed of complex microbial communities. It is the main cause of major dental diseases such as caries and periodontal diseases. In a healthy state, there is a delicate balance between the dental biofilm and host tissues. Nevertheless, due to the oral cavity changes, this biofilm can become pathogenic. The pathogenic biofilm shifts the balance from demineralization-remineralization to demineralization and results in dental caries. Dentists should consider caries as a result of biological processes of dental plaque and seek treatments for the etiologic factors, not merely look for the treatment of the outcome caused by biofilm, i.e., dental caries. Caries prevention strategies can be classified into three groups based on the role and responsibility of the individuals doing them: (1) community-based strategy, (2) dental professionals-based strategy, and (3) individual-based strategy. The community-based methods include fluoridation of water, salt, and milk. The dental professionals-based methods include professional tooth cleaning and use of varnish, fluoride gel and foam, fissure sealant, and antimicrobial agents. The individual-based (self-care) methods include the use of fluoride toothpaste, fluoride supplements, fluoride mouthwashes, fluoride gels, chlorhexidine gels and mouthwashes, slow-release fluoride devices, oral hygiene, diet control, and noncariogenic sweeteners such as xylitol. This study aimed to study the research in the recent five years (2015–2020) to identify the characteristics of dental biofilm and its role in dental caries and explore the employed approaches to prevent the related infections.

1. Introduction

Oral cavity provides an environment that leads to the colonization and growth of an extensive range of microorganisms. Bacteria are the most prevalent of them. The highest bacterial accumulation is found as a biofilm on the tooth surface (dental plaque). The loss of mucosal surface reduces the microbial load on the mucosal surfaces [1, 2]. These microbes normally exist on all oral surfaces and are necessary for the normal physiological growth of the oral cavity [3]. Static microflora contributes to the host health by preventing the establishment and colonization of exogenous microorganisms and potential pathogens and regulating the inflammatory response of the host to oral commensal bacteria [4]. The oral bacterial population with almost 1000 species is very complicated [5]. The clinical treatment of caries usually deals with the restoration of hard tissues considering the functional and aesthetic needs. However, this does not treat the illness but treats its outcomes. In clinical settings, a common method for the management of dental caries is the elimination of contaminated tissues to prevent the further progress of the disease. The areas surrounding the restoration gradually undergo caries, so a small restoration must be substituted by a greater restoration and dental tissues are increasingly eliminated. Repetition of this cycle leads to extensive loss of dental tissue, pulpal involvement, and finally tooth loss [6]. Admittedly, an inadequate understanding of dental caries as a biological process leads dentist to such a problem. Considering the developments in genetics, particularly molecular biology, findings make it possible for us to replace the old paradigms with new ways of caries prevention and treatment. Dental decay is caused by an ecological imbalance in mouth microflora. These imbalances can be influenced by environmental and biological reasons. Dental caries can be controlled by managing the above mentioned changes [7, 8]. In this review, we aimed to study the recent research to identify the characteristics of dental biofilm and its role in dental caries and also explore the employed methods to prevent the related infections.

2. Caries and Its Stages

Dental caries is a chronic and preventable disease caused by dental biofilm activity. This disease is multifactorial and is initially caused by an imbalance of mouth microflora as a result of existence of carbohydrates on the tooth. Caries is characterized by local demineralization of the teeth and loss of dental structure. Some biofilm bacteria metabolize the existing carbohydrates and produce acids. These acids can reduce the pH and reach lower than the critical limit (5.5 for enamel and 6.2 for dentine) if they remain in the biofilm for a long time. This acidic environment affects the biofilm composition and tooth surface. Therefore, acidogenic and acidophilic bacteria increase, which results in a more acidic environment. Calcium and phosphate are removed from the tooth surface, as a result of which demineralization occurs due to the loss of minerals. If pH returns to its normal level, calcium and phosphate can return to the tooth structure and cause remineralization [9]. Dental caries is created on the surface and subsurface areas of the tooth following a dynamic trend of demineralization and remineralization. These events occur several times over time and are influenced by several factors like the type and number of biofilm microorganisms, diet, oral hygiene, genetics, tooth anatomy, fluoride consumption, and salivary content and composition. These factors are specific to each individual and vary from tooth to tooth and from place to place [9]. As demineralization continues, primary caries occurs, a lesion with no cavities called white spot lesion (WSL) on enamel. Most primary caries can be terminated or remineralized; i.e., they are reversible. Dental caries becomes cavitated as it progresses. Cavitated lesions often need restorative intervention and are irreversible. Moderate lesions are lesions that have not extended the internal one-third of the dentin, and advanced or deep lesions are those that have extended the internal one-third of the dentin [9].

3. Dental Plaque

Dental plaque is a soft and sticky layer accumulated on the tooth surface. Dental plaque, also called biofilm, mostly consists of bacteria and their products, extracellular matrix, and water. Biofilm is not sticky food debris or accidental accumulation of opportunistic microorganisms; it is the accumulation of a series of organized events. The formation of dental plaque involves the formation of the pellicle, initial attachment, and plaque maturity [10]. Plaque forms as follows: a clean tooth surface is immediately exposed to the salivary byproducts, gingival crevice fluid (GCF), and some compounds resulting from bacteria. These products are absorbed by the surface with a negatively charged hydroxyapatite, creating a layer called acquired pellicle. The dental pellicle is covered with positively charged molecules, which contain more than 180 proteins, peptides, and glycoproteins such as proline-rich proteins, histidine-rich proteins, phosphoproteins (e.g., statherin), creatine, mucin, and other molecules that act as the binding sites for bacteria [10]. Some bacterial products like glycosyltransferases and glucans are also found in the pellicles. Interestingly, the main compound of a pellicle is stable in different areas of the oral cavity and among individuals. The bacteria attached to the tooth surface are not directly connected to the enamel; they are bound to the enamel through pellicle [10]. Primary bonding is initiated a few minutes after brushing the colonization. A cell wall with negatively charged bacteria facilitates its connection to the positively charged receptors of the pellicle. The early stages of transfer and interference with the surface are similar and nonspecific for all bacteria. Specific involvement of the binding molecules of the bacterial cell wall and pellicle receptors determines whether the bacteria remain in contact with the surface or not. Only a small part of oral bacteria can bind to the pellicle receptors, which constitutes the most common biofilm bacteria over a short time after tooth cleaning. During the early hours, streptococci form over 60–80% of biofilm bacteria. These bacteria along with Haemophilus, Neisseria, Actinomyces, and Veillonella species are known as primary colonizers. They initially create a wide range of nonspecific and reversible Van der Waals connections with pellicle (more than 50 nm). Then, they make stronger and irreversible short-range connections (10–20 nm) with pellicle receptors by their specific surface molecules [10].

Streptococci create different adhesion mechanisms. They have different adhesion mechanisms such as products of glycosyltransferases, glucan-binding proteins, and pili, while other bacteria such as actinomycetes bind to the surface using their fimbriae [11]. These bacteria provide new adhesion sites for other bacteria and change the environment with their metabolic activity, thereby affecting the biofilm viability (e.g., reducing the ambient oxygen) [11]. Plaque matures as follows: the primary colonizing bacteria bound to the tooth surface provide new receptors for the bacteria to help induce coadhesion via binding. The bacteria of different species or even strains of a species can specifically bind to specific bacteria. Fusobacterium coaggregates with all oral bacteria, while Veillonella, Capnocytophaga, and Prevotella coaggregate with streptococci or actinomycetes. Most of this adhesion between various bacteria is performed through lectin-like receptors (proteins that identify the carbohydrates). Thus, they can be inhibited by lactose or other galactosidase or amino acids like L-arginine [10, 12]. Secondary colonizers like P.Int, FN, Prevotella loescheii, Capnocytophaga, and PG cannot bind to the clean tooth surface but can bind to bacteria in the dental plaque. Some specific structures in dental biofilm such as corn cob and test-tube brush are created due to the adhesion of cocci to filamentous bacteria. In this stage of plaque maturity, the bacteria secret extracellular polysaccharide, which constitutes the biofilm scaffold [10, 13]. If the dental plaque remains for about 7 days, it provides a favorable environment for the colonization of some aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, which are called secondary colonizers, including PG, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Treponema denticola [10, 13].

4. Dental Biofilm

A healthy dental biofilm is mostly composed of commensal nonpathogenic microbes. These microbes are not completely independent and are regularly linked with each other and host tissues like gingiva even in a healthy state. The host provides the surfaces for colonization, and beneficial bacteria prevent the colonization of pathogenic bacteria [4, 14]. The advantages of this connection are manifested in conditions such as antibiotic sore mouth when inhibition of normal flora leads to the growth of opportunistic pathogens [4]. Studies have shown that commensal bacterial species such as S. salivarius, S. sanguis, and Atopobium parvulum can induce biofilm health-related conditions. Nevertheless, further research is needed to explore this issue. It has been shown that S. salivarius inhibits the quorum sensing process and mutans biofilm formation, which results in its anticaries properties [15–17]. The commensal bacteria in biofilm are involved in the immune system development. They do this by presenting diverse antigens to the host immune system. The commensal bacteria create a cascade of signals that induce the host resistance, while pathogenic bacteria induce severe inflammation in the host. Hence, proinflammatory cytokines are produced in a low number in oral epithelial cells, which induces the expression of E-selection in vascular endothelial tissues and produce IL8 [10]. The commensal bacteria induce the innate immune response of the host, which strategically juxtaposes the neutrophils with subgingival bacteria and junctional epithelium. The main bacteria with the highest variation in the oral cavity include S, Staphylococcus, Peptostreptococcus, P, Haemophilus, Veillonella, Leptotrichia, Treponema, Propionibacterium, Actinomyces, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Eikenella, Gemella, Granulicatella, Rothia, Porphyromonas, Capnocytophaga, L, Neisseria, and Eubacteria [18–20]. Oral health depends on the conservation of its normal microflora. A disease occurs once the species are imbalanced and pathogens become dominant. Oral health and disease are dynamic processes in which the ecology of communities is a determinant factor, not an organism. Understanding the meaning of and identifying the molecular changes among the disease and health conditions provide the clinicians with the ability to diagnose and reverse the disease in early stages [21].

5. Bacterial Groups in the Caries Process

The newest molecular biology methods of microorganisms related to caries are B. dentium, B. adolescentis, SM, Scardovia wiggsiae, B. longum, Selenomonas spp., P. spp., and L. spp. [16]. Studies have indicated that early streptococci on the newly cleaned tooth surface mostly include S. sanguinis, S. oralis, and S. mitis strains, and the content of their mutans is only 2% or less. It has also been shown that most primary colonizers belong to the S. mitis group. The amount of microflora actinomycetes increases over time so that the smooth surfaces of most bacteria in the mature plaque include actinomycetes and nonmutans streptococci. Mutans are found in small numbers [22] and are more abundant in white spot lesions (WSLs) than in healthy regions. However, nonmutans streptococci still constitute most WSL bacteria. It has been shown that the initial members of microflora can singly dissolve enamel in the absence of mutans and lactobacilli [22]. In cavitated dentinal lesions, including rampant caries, mutans constitute about 30% of microflora, which indicates that mutans are linked with progressive carious lesions. Nevertheless, some studies have shown that the dentinal caries of mutans is less frequent in deep lesions, and lactobacilli, Prevotella, and bifidobacteria are more prominent. These results indicate that microflora on the tooth surfaces change as caries progresses [22]. S. mutans is Gram-positive cocci. The oral S spp. are normal flora but are also opportunistic and can cause dental caries [23]. They include SM, S. sobrinus, S. rattus, S. cricetus, S. ferus, S. downei, and S. macacae. Virulence has numerous factors that induce its demineralization [23] (Table 1).

6. Extracellular Polymeric Substance [24]

The extracellular polymeric substance [24] of the biofilm plays a pivotal role in maintaining the bacterial integrity and adhesion. New studies on the biology of EPS have reported several roles for the scaffold resulting from EPS, which are vital for the biofilm [25, 26]. Some of these roles include surface adhesion, spatial and chemical heterogeneity in biofilm, competitive or collaborative interactions, and improved resistance to antimicrobials [25]. The construction of EPS matrix relates to the existing substrates, production and secretion of e-materials, and shear forces. The key part of EPS content in oral biofilms which is related to caries is polysaccharides, especially the glucans derived from SM [27]. In addition to these, polysaccharides result from other bacteria (e.g., actinomycetes, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus gordonii), and combination compounds of starch glucan exist in this matrix. Further, this matrix contains eDNA [28] (proteins derived from bacteria with properties similar to amyloid), host GP which are able to participate in the scaffold with G such as glucan-eDNA compounds [29]. The function and structure of this class of extracellular polymers are still not known completely and require further studies. Glucans are composed of glucose components, which are connected byα 1–4 and α 1–6 glycosidic bonds and are created by the coordinated activity of streptococcal exoenzymes called glucosyltransferase [3, 27, 30]. Interestingly, these extracellular enzymes can bind to the tooth structure in the active state and produce glucans locally, thereby providing new binding sites for the bacteria. In addition to these, glucosyltransferase enzymes bind to other oral microorganisms (e.g., commensal S, actinomycetes, L, and even Candida albicans) and make them G producers [3, 27, 30].

The G produced on the tooth surface increase the surface bacterial aggregation. They also cause new interspecies interaction and increase cell-cell adhesion [3]. These extracellular polymers aggregate on different areas of tooth surface on the cell membrane, each having a complementary role in the EPS matrix formation and biofilm development. Some of these roles are surface adhesion, cell-cell adhesion, and cell cluster development found in the biofilm systems [31]. The biofilm matrix is developed three-dimensionally with biofilm maturation and production of extracellular polymers, covering cell clusters, building bridges between them, and creating a firmly divided structure. This heterogeneous structure resulting from EPS explains the presence of microbial clusters in various sizes and composition in the human oral biofilm [32–34]. The EPS sediment on the surface and its development affect the mechanical properties of biofilm like the binding strength of biofilm to the surface and its integrity [35]. A well-formed biofilm is hardly removed from the tooth surface and has reinforced viscoelastic properties that help it to remain on the surface during the shear stresses exerted by liquids [35]. The structure of the EPS matrix can be locally altered by dextranases, DNAs, and protolithic enzymes to create new binding sites for the following bacteria that have not been able to join the biofilm. The stiffness of the biofilm matrix is increased over time. The physicochemical properties of biofilm protect the buried bacteria by inhibiting the access of drugs and increasing their AM resistance. For instance, EPS can bind to cationic AM like CHX and AM peptides and prevent their permeation into the depth of biofilm, thus preventing their toxic effect [3, 34].

7. Fighting Dental Caries

The caries-preventive strategies can be classified into three groups depending on the role and responsibility of the individuals doing them (Figure 1): (1) community-based strategies, (2) dental professionals-based strategies, and (3) individual-based strategies. The dental professionals-based strategies include professional tooth cleaning and use of varnish, fluoride gel and foam, fissure sealant, and antimicrobial agents. The individual-based (self-care) strategies consist of using fluoride toothpaste, fluoride supplements, fluoride mouthwashes, fluoride gels for personal use, chlorhexidine gels and mouthwashes for personal use, slow-release fluoride devices, oral health, diet control, and noncariogenic sweeteners like xylitol [36]. Recent studies (2015–2020) are mentioned in Table 2.

Figure 1 

Prevention strategies of dental caries.

8. Communal Activity-Based Methods

8.1. Fluoridation of Water, Salt, and Milk

Fluoridation of drinking water has been used as an affordable practical way to reduce socioeconomic inequalities related to dental caries. Fluoridation of drinking water decreases dental caries by 30–50%, and termination of water fluoridation in conditions with inadequate alternative sources of fluoride increases caries by 18% [149]. Fluoridation of salt includes many advantages of water fluoridation, and consumers can choose to use it. The fluoride-containing salt will have different effects depending on the type of consumer. In high-consumption families, it can cause fluorosis [150]. Fluoridation of milk is beneficial for school children, especially for their permanent teeth. An advantage of this method is that it can be used in the high-risk group. Its consumption rate is also controllable. Moreover, individuals have the right to choose it or not. Fluoride in milk is absorbed more slowly than the fluoride in water due to the presence of calcium in milk [150, 151].

9. Dental Professionals-Based Methods

9.1. Professional Tooth Cleaning

Karlstad program can be used for biofilm control. In this program, the application of topical fluoride and diet, daily oral hygiene, and tooth cleaning with certain intervals are presented by a trained specialist. Further, this is done every two weeks in this program because studies have shown that the biofilm remaining for two to three weeks leads to the formation of WSL and caries. These intervals can be increased to three months in people with good oral health [152].

9.2. Use of Varnish, Gel, and Fluoride

The individuals aged <18 years are advised to use fluoride varnish every 3–6 months. Tooth caries due to the application of fluoride varnish has been reported to reduce 46% in permanent dentition and 33% in primary dentition [153, 154]. APF and NaF gels are used professionally. Studies have reported 26% reduction in caries in permanent dentition and 20% in primary dentition as a result of the application of 1% sodium fluoride twice per year. Fluoride foam has the same advantages and density as fluoride gel and releases the equivalent fluoride [153]. Fluoride exerts its anticaries effects by three different ways. In the first way, fluoride ion in dental tissues reinforces the fluorapatite deposition from the salivary phosphate and calcium ions. This insoluble deposition occupies the soluble salts including magnesium and carbonate lost during demineralization by the bacteria. This process makes the enamel more resistant to acid [9]. In the second way, caries becomes remineralized without the formation of the cavity using a similar process [9]. In the third way, fluoride ion has AM activity. At low concentrations, fluoride obstructs the construction of glycosyltransferase enzyme. Glycosyltransferase gets the glucose involved in the formation of extracellular polysaccharides and enhances the bacterial adhesion. The formation of extracellular polysaccharides is inhibited by limited bacterial metabolism during the meal time, which prevents the aggregation and maintenance of carbohydrates. Therefore, the duration of the attack of caries is limited to the period of eating and after it. High concentrations of fluoride ions (12000 ppm) are directly toxic for some oral microorganisms like SM. Fluoride has a wide range of activities and has long stability in the oral cavity. It reduces the acid production at 1–10 ppm concentration; it is bacteriostatic at 250 ppm and bactericidal at 1000 ppm [9]. The iodine group is bactericidal and has a wide range of antibacterial activities and short-term stability in the mouth [9]. Many studies have documented the efficacy of fissure sealant treatment in reducing occlusal caries in permanent dentition in children and adults with a high risk of caries [36]. The population-based studies have confirmed the cost-effectiveness of fissure sealant and its long-term effects. Since most caries in the current population occurs in the pits and fissures, fissure sealant seems to be beneficial [150].

9.3. Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF)

Systematic reviews have recommended the application of SDF for termination or prevention of caries in children and adults and root caries in the aged people [155, 156]. This solution is used locally, and silver ions exert their antibacterial effects by breaking the bacterial membrane, denaturing the proteins, and preventing the DNA proliferation [157]. Silver and fluoride both have a key role in the termination of caries progress and sensitivity of tooth [158–161]. Silver reduces the demineralization speed and boosts the remineralization process [162].

9.4. Antimicrobial Agents

Numerous antimicrobial factors have been introduced to decrease the number of bacteria and disturb the biofilm structure. Dental decay is a biofilm associated disease which changes with regimen. Hence, changing the number of bacteria does not have a long-term effect on it. If a remarkable reduction does not occur in the consumption of fermentable carbohydrates, the microbiome in biofilm will adapt to the acidogenic environment and the uric acid produced by the cariogenic diets; thus, AM will have slight effect on the outcome of dental caries [9].

Principally, most antimicrobial agents used for prophylaxis contain a wide range of antimicrobials and provide a ground for the growth of opportunistic factors by eliminating the normal flora. Therefore, except for the consumers of fluoride toothpaste, all other chemical agents should not be used routinely in the daily schedule of the patients. These agents are used as an auxiliary aid when the routine prevention is not effective in individuals with a mental or physical disability, people with reduced salivary secretion, or cases with difficult mechanical removal of plaque such as conditions associated with orthodontic treatment, before and after oral surgeries, and frequent use of crowns [9]. Some antimicrobial agents along with their mechanism of effect are presented in Table 3.

10. Self-Care Methods for Caries Prevention

10.1. Reducing the Consumption of Fermentable Carbohydrates

The main reason for caries-induced dysbiosis is the overuse of fermentable carbohydrates [179]. The diet mechanism has significant effects on the impact of biofilm on dental caries. Frequent consumption of foods having sucrose changes the biofilm from a noncariogenic state to a cariogenic state. Established biofilm, which is repeatedly exposed to sucrose, quickly makes acids from it, thereby creating an acidic environment [22]. Dental caries is mostly caused by the frequency of sucrose consumption, not its amount [22]. The commensal bacteria use the sugar and make acid when a person has a low sugar diet; however, pH is quickly recovered by the mechanisms present in mouth. Frequent consumption of sugars disturbs the balance, and fully reciprocal acidogenic and aciduric strains appear in pathogenic amounts [180, 181]. WHO has seriously recommended restraining the intake of free sugars to <10% of the entire energy intake to prevent weight gain and dental caries [182]. This refers to the <50 g/day consumption of free sugars. Natural sugars such as sugars in honey and added monosaccharides to the foods are free sugars [182]. Cohort studies with quality evidence have reported 15% sugar as the moderate level. Other studies have also recommended the reduction of free sugars to 5% of total energy. Sugar consumption below 5% seems unlikely to cause any caries [183]. Diet with high amount of sugar causes the aggregation of acidogenic and acid-tolerant bacteria and protects them by increasing the production of EPS [27, 174]. Indirect evidence shows caries reduction by decreasing the intake of free sugars. For example, a significant decrease of caries during five years has been reported in the Iraqi children with reduced sugar intake due to the sanctions of the United Nations [184]. Starch as well as sucrose is known as a cariogenic agent. Starch’s metabolism causes the long-term acidity in the pits and interdental spaces vulnerable to decay [180].

11. Oral Hygiene

The tooth surfaces free of biofilm are not decayed. Patients should regularly eliminate biofilm by brushing with fluoride-containing toothpaste and dental floss [9, 159]. The oral biofilm composition changes over time following oral hygiene by regular brushing twice a day, and oral microbiome is maintained in the healthy state [160]. The brushing does not remove oral bacteria totally but rather eliminates them from the tooth surface. A massive amount of them is removed from the mouth after swallowing and/or rinsing after brushing and flossing; however, an enough number of them stay for proliferation. Cleaning and exposing to oxygen may kill anaerobic organisms; however, no species is eliminated. Accurate mechanical tooth cleaning disrupts the dental biofilm and cleans tooth surface. While all bacteria that constitute established biofilm still do not exist, most of them are not able to bind to the clean tooth surface [9]. Brushing and flossing are advantageous in that they do not destroy the oral normal flora. Frequent mechanical removal of biofilm does not cause the risk of opportunist infection but rather changes the biofilm’s composition. Patients with good oral hygiene have a high percentage of S. mitis or S. sanguis in their teeth biofilm and have a smaller amount of cariogenic bacteria than the more developed biofilm having a high amount of S. mutans [9]. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the former concepts of plaque removal or accurate control of another plaque are not considered for the management of caries. Proper oral hygiene is certainly important for biofilm control, but systemic review studies have shown that mechanical removal of biofilm alone, in the absence of fluoride, is not enough to manage caries [158].

11.1. Fluoride Toothpaste

One of the main causes of caries reduction in developed countries is the extensive application of fluoride TP. Easy and extensive application, low cost, and cultural acceptance have turned fluoride toothpaste into an ideal method for the promotion of general health, and brushing twice a day using fluoride toothpaste has been recommended as a powerful preventive strategy [185].

11.2. Fluoride Supplements

Fluoride supplements are capable of decreasing dental caries by about 20–30% and apply to populations with no access to fluoridated water. These supplements, due to the risk of fluorosis, should be used cautiously and can be used in kids who are at high risk of dental caries and committed parents [153].

11.3. Fluoride Mouthwashes and Gels for Personal Use

Fluoride mouthwashes with 0.2 and 0.05% concentrations are available for daily and weekly use and have been reported to prevent caries by 26%. The fluoride gels for personal use are available as APF, neutral NaF, and stannous fluoride and have been found to reduce caries by 32% in communities with inadequate fluoridated water [36, 153].

11.4. Noncariogenic Sweeteners

Numerous studies have reported the caries-preventive effect for xylitol and to a lesser extent for sorbitol. Xylitol can decrease biofilm [186]. Xylitol is a five-carbon sweetener that has beneficial effects on oral health. Most clinical studies have shown that daily consumption of ≥5 g xylitol gum is efficacious in decreasing caries [187, 188]. Use of xylitol decreases the SM amount [189]. Different mechanisms that can reduce mutans are growth inhibition, plaque reduction, oral pH increase, reduction of sticky polysaccharides produced by mutants, and inhibition of stress proteins [48, 58, 60, 92, 98, 108, 186–190].

11.5. Strategies to Boost Saliva

Salivary secretion plays a pivotal role in preventing dysbiosis and maintaining oral health. In addition to the mechanical deletion and buffering capability of saliva, it has enzymes, GP, salts, immunoglobulins, and AM peptides which help with the biofilm stability and control [162]. Although there are clear salivary stimulants, salivary induction is difficult in practice. In patients who are still able to produce saliva, local methods like increasing water consumption and chewing gums and salivary alternatives regularly can enhance saliva making. The moisturizers and enzymes in the products can decrease the symptoms of patients with dry mouth and maintain healthy biofilm [4, 191, 192].

11.6. Prebiotics and Probiotics

Prebiotics are oligosaccharides and nutritional fibers which contribute to useful bacteria’s growth while probiotics are defined as living microbes which have advantages for patients [155]. There are not many studies on prebiotics in dentistry, while there are more studies on Arg. Arg is an aminoacid that is found in saliva. The bacteria in healthy biofilm could use Arg through ADS. There is high activity of ADS in noncarious places rather than places with caries lesions [157, 193]. Moreover, studies [157, 194] have shown that adding Arg to fluoride TP can enhance the ADS activity, increase the pH, and help to make a healthy biofilm [157, 175, 193].

The analysis of clinical trials has shown the synergistic effect of arginine and fluoride on the primary caries [176]. Another interesting aspect of prebiotics is breastfeeding. Breast milk is rich in complex biotic oligosaccharides. Systemic studies have shown that breastfeeding in the first year has protective effects against ECC, and bottle-fed newborns had four times more caries than breastfed newborns [195, 196]. Recently, application of probiotics to fight harmful bacteria has increased [156]. Probiotics are dietary supplements that are principally consumed through fermented vegetables, dairy products, and bread. Additionally, there are different forms of these materials such as tablets, drops, and lozenges that have been commercialized. Their mechanism is not known completely. They have effects on biofilms directly and on the immune system [197]. Studies have concluded that therapeutic probiotics can especially reduce the number of S. mutans [198]. However, there are very few studies on the effect of oral microbiome composition. Moreover, an increase in nonmutans streptococci and a decrease in the count of S. mutans, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella have been reported after using a supplement for 12 weeks [199]. In contrast, another study has found that the use of lozenges containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Brevibacillus brevis has no significant effect on the oral microbiome in adults after 4 weeks. These conflicting results may be partly due to different molecular and sequencing technologies used in various studies. The results of these studies have shown a 33% reduction in caries in preschool children [200]. Nevertheless, there is insufficient evidence for their overall recommendation. Probiotic treatment for oral health is one of the highly advanced emerging concepts.

12. Conclusion

One of the basic aspects of general health is oral health. Oral diseases cause many problems for individuals and society. They are very common all over the world. While there are effective methods for and adequate information about the prevention of oral diseases, they are still one of the most prevalent health problems. The best strategy to fight caries is the use of a combination of community-based strategies, oral health professionals-based strategies, and self-care strategies. The most important strategies to fight against caries are paying attention to the oral health in macroeconomic policies of countries to create a healthy society, changing the attitude of dental professionals from a treatment-centered approach to a preventive approach, and empowering the individuals by enhancing their knowledge, attitude, and performance in line with maintaining and promoting their oral health.

13. Future Directions

Despite many attempts made to control caries, these efforts have not been effective in controlling caries. Further studies are suggested to identify the confounding factors of biofilm such as natural antimicrobial materials that, unlike antibiotics, do not cause bacterial resistance and are cheap and available to everyone. Moreover, more studies are required on probiotics and production of S. mutans strains that are not able to produce lactic acid by recombinant DNA technology or other bacteria that competitively eliminate the microbial cariogenic agents of the oral cavity and manufacture of slow-release devices for antimicrobials such as fluoride in the oral cavity and silver nanoparticle pins that prevent caries by releasing antimicrobial agents. Furthermore, we suggest conducting future studies on the production of caries vaccine to induce biologic defense against caries in the oral cavity and creation of protective layers on the tooth that act beyond the current sealants in terms of gear, duration, and caries prevention.

Abbreviations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

The authors declare that this work was done by the authors named in this article. Mohammad Nima Motallaei, Mohsen Yazdanian, Hamid Tebyanian, Elahe Tahmasebi, Reza Ranjbar, and Alireza Yazdanian were involved in study design and data collection. Mohsen Yazdanian, Hamid Tebyanian, Elahe Tahmasebi, and Alexander Seifalian critically reviewed the data and wrote the review article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the useful comments given by colleagues at the Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

References

1. J. A. Aas, B. J. Paster, L. N. Stokes, I. Olsen, and F. E. Dewhirst, “Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5721–5732, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
2. E. Zaura, B. J. Keijser, S. M. Huse, and W. Crielaard, “Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 259, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. J. Xiao, M. I. Klein, M. L. Falsetta et al., “The exopolysaccharide matrix modulates the interaction between 3D architecture and virulence of a mixed-species oral biofilm,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e1002623, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. P. D. Marsh, A. Moter, and D. A. Devine, “Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control,” Periodontology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 16–35, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
5. G. N. Belibasakis, “Microbiological changes of the ageing oral cavity,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 96, pp. 230–232, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
6. P. P. Hujoel and P. Lingström, “Nutrition, dental caries and periodontal disease: a narrative review,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 44, pp. S79–S84, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. R. Grigalauskiene, E. Slabsinskiene, and I. Vasiliauskiene, “Biological approach of dental caries management,” Stomatologija, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 107–112, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
8. M. Lof, M. M. Janus, and B. P. Krom, “Metabolic interactions between bacteria and fungi in commensal oral biofilms,” Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 3, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
9. A. V. Ritter and R. Walter, Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7th edition, 2018.
10. C. J. Seneviratne, C. F. Zhang, and L. P. Samaranayake, “Dental plaque biofilm in oral health and disease,” The Chinese Journal of Dental Research: The Official Journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
11. N. Okahashi, M. Nakata, Y. Terao et al., “Pili of oral Streptococcus sanguinis bind to salivary amylase and promote the biofilm formation,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 50, no. 3-4, pp. 148–154, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
12. K. Hojo, S. Nagaoka, T. Ohshima, and N. Maeda, “Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 982–990, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. M. G. Newman, H. Takei, P. R. Klokkevold, and F. A. Carranza, Newman and Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018.
14. H. Seifi Kafshgari, M. Yazdanian, R. Ranjbar et al., “The effect of Citrullus colocynthis extracts on Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, normal gingival fibroblast and breast cancer cells,” Journal of Biological Research—Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale, vol. 92, no. 1, p. 8201, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
15. L. S. G. Garcia, A. C. B. Delbem, J. P. Pessan et al., “Anticaries effect of toothpaste with nano-sized sodium hexametaphosphate,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3535–3542, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
16. S. A. Mosaddad, E. Tahmasebi, A. Yazdanian et al., “Oral microbial biofilms: an update,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2005–2019, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. S. Tamura, H. Yonezawa, M. Motegi et al., “Inhibiting effects of Streptococcus salivarius on competence-stimulating peptide-dependent biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
18. E. M. Bik, C. D. Long, G. C. Armitage et al., “Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals,” The ISME Journal, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 962–974, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
19. X. Kuang, V. Chen, and X. Xu, “Novel approaches to the control of oral microbial biofilms,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 6498932, 13 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. M. Zarco, T. Vess, and G. Ginsburg, “The oral microbiome in health and disease and the potential impact on personalized dental medicine,” Oral Diseases, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 109–120, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
21. J. Panezai, Periodontal Medicine: Oral Inflammatory Conditions with Special Emphasis on Immunological Aspects, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden, 2018.
22. N. Takahashi and B. Nyvad, “Ecological hypothesis of dentin and root caries,” Caries Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 422–431, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
23. T. Thurnheer and B. G. Belibasakis, “Streptococcus oralis maintains homeostasis in supragingival biofilms by antagonizing cariogenic pathogen Streptococcus mutans,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 33, pp. 234–239, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
24. F. Bröseler, C. Tietmann, C. Bommer, T. Drechsel, M. Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, and S. Jepsen, “Randomised clinical trial investigating self-assembling peptide P11-4 in the treatment of early caries,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 123–132, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
25. H.-C. Flemming, J. Wingender, U. Szewzyk, P. Steinberg, S. A. Rice, and S. Kjelleberg, “Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 563–575, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
26. H. Koo, M. F. Hayacibara, B. D. Schobel et al., “Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 782–789, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
27. W. H. Bowen and H. Koo, “Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms,” Caries Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 69–86, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
28. N. Rostami, R. C. Shields, S. A. Yassin et al., “A critical role for extracellular DNA in dental plaque formation,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
29. M. I. Klein, G. Hwang, P. H. S. Santos, O. H. Campanella, and H. Koo, “Streptococcus mutans-derived extracellular matrix in cariogenic oral biofilms,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 5, p. 10, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
30. F. Zhu, H. Zhang, and H. Wu, “Glycosyltransferase-mediated sweet modification in oral streptococci,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 659–665, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
31. L. Hobley, C. Harkins, C. E. MacPhee, and N. R. Stanley-Wall, “Giving structure to the biofilm matrix: an overview of individual strategies and emerging common themes,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 649–669, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
32. J. L. Mark Welch, B. J. Rossetti, C. W. Rieken, F. E. Dewhirst, and G. G. Borisy, “Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. E791–E800, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
33. A. Stacy, L. McNally, S. E. Darch, S. P. Brown, and M. Whiteley, “The biogeography of polymicrobial infection,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 93–105, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
34. A. M. Valm, “The structure of dental plaque microbial communities in the transition from health to dental caries and periodontal disease,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 431, no. 16, pp. 2957–2969, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
35. B. W. Peterson, Y. He, Y. Ren et al., “Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 234–245, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
36. S. Z. Mohebbi, Early Childhood Caries and A Community Trial of Its Prevention in Tehran, Iran, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2008.
37. C. Frese, T. Wohlrab, L. Sheng et al., “Clinical management and prevention of dental caries in athletes: a four-year randomized controlled clinical trial,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 16991, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
38. A. H. Zhang and J. Li, “Evaluation of the efficacy of sodium fluoride dental protective agent combined with pit and fissure sealant in prevention of dental caries in preschool children,” Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 553–556, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
39. A. Al-Jobair, N. Al-Hammad, S. Alsadhan, and F. Salama, “Retention and caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based sealants: an 18-month-randomized clinical trial,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 654–661, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
40. J. Kalnina and R. Care, “Prevention of occlusal caries using a ozone, sealant and fluoride varnish in children,” Stomatologija, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
41. P. Milgrom, J. A. Horst, S. Ludwig et al., “Topical silver diamine fluoride for dental caries arrest in preschool children: a randomized controlled trial and microbiological analysis of caries associated microbes and resistance gene expression,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 68, pp. 72–78, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
42. Y. J. Liu, Q. Chang, W. S. Rong, and X. L. Zhao, “Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up,” Chinese Journal of Stomatology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 437–442, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
43. Y. Xu, Q. J. Wu, L. P. Luo, and S. Q. Jin, “Evaluation of the clinical effect of fluoride coating combined with pit and fissure sealing or preventive resin filling on prevention of first permanent molars caries,” Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 298–301, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
44. N. Pahumunto, S. Piwat, O. Chankanka, N. Akkarachaneeyakorn, K. Rangsitsathian, and R. Teanpaisan, “Reducing mutans streptococci and caries development by Lactobacillus paracasei SD1 in preschool children: a randomized placebo-controlled trial,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 331–337, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
45. P. Rechmann, S. Bekmezian, B. M. T. Rechmann et al., “MI varnish and MI paste plus in a caries prevention and remineralization study: a randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2229–2239, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
46. R. N. Cabral, J. Faber, S. A. M. Otero, L. A. Hilgert, and S. C. Leal, “Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 3171–3177, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
47. I. G. Chestnutt, S. Hutchings, R. Playle et al., “Seal or Varnish? A randomised controlled trial to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 21, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
48. S. Watthanasaen, A. T. Merchant, S. Luengpailin, N. Chansamak, A. Pisek, and W. Pitiphat, “Xylitol-containing chewing gum for caries prevention in students with disabilities: a randomised trial,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 519–527, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
49. D. D. Faustino-Silva, B. C. Colvara, E. Meyer, F. N. Hugo, R. K. Celeste, and J. B. Hilgert, “Motivational interviewing effects on caries prevention in children differ by income: a randomized cluster trial,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 477–484, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
50. J. Lin and H. Yao, “Effects of pit and fissure sealant combined with fluorine protective paint on prevention of children caries aged 5–8 years old,” Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 384–387, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
51. L. Wu, X. Gao, E. C. M. Lo, S. M. Y. Ho, C. McGrath, and M. C. M. Wong, “Motivational interviewing to promote oral health in adolescents,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 378–384, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
52. A. K. Alexandria, C. Nassur, C. B. C. Nóbrega et al., “Effect of TiF4 varnish on microbiological changes and caries prevention: in situ and in vivo models,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2583–2591, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
53. E. K. Salas-López, M. Pierdant-Pérez, J. F. Hernández-Sierra, F. Ruíz, P. Mandeville, and A. J. Pozos-Guillén, “Effect of silver nanoparticle-added pit and fissure sealant in the prevention of dental caries in children,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
54. W. Xin, K. C. M. Leung, E. C. M. Lo, M. Y. Mok, and M. H. Leung, “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries of Sjögren’s syndrome patients,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 102, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
55. H. Enerbäck, M. Möller, C. Nylén, C. Ödman Bresin, I. Östman Ros, and A. Westerlund, “Effects of orthodontic treatment and different fluoride regimens on numbers of cariogenic bacteria and caries risk: a randomized controlled trial,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
56. L. Alsabek, Z. Al-Nerabieah, N. Bshara, and J. C. Comisi, “Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: randomized controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 86, pp. 69–74, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
57. H. R. Su, R. R. Yang, W. H. Qian, and J. M. Yu, “The effect of fluoride varnish Duraphat in preventing deciduous dental caries in preschool children,” Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
58. F. Cocco, G. Carta, M. G. Cagetti, L. Strohmenger, P. Lingström, and G. Campus, “The caries preventive effect of 1-year use of low-dose xylitol chewing gum. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial in high-caries-risk adults,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2733–2740, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
59. M. Muller-Bolla, F. Courson, L. Lupi-Pégurier et al., “Effectiveness of resin-based sealants with and without fluoride placed in a high caries risk population: multicentric 2-year randomized clinical trial,” Caries Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 312–322, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
60. E. Aluckal and A. Ankola, “Effectiveness of xylitol and polyol chewing gum on salivary streptococcus mutans in children: a randomized controlled trial,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 445–449, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
61. M. Memarpour, S. Dadaein, E. Fakhraei, and M. Vossoughi, “Comparison of oral health education and fluoride varnish to prevent early childhood caries: a randomized clinical trial,” Caries Research, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 433–442, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
62. C. R. Parkinson, A. T. Hara, M. Nehme, F. Lippert, and D. T. Zero, “A randomised clinical evaluation of a fluoride mouthrinse and dentifrice in an in situ caries model,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 70, pp. 59–66, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
63. M. Anderson, G. Dahllöf, F. C. Soares, and M. Grindefjord, “Impact of biannual treatment with fluoride varnish on tooth-surface-level caries progression in children aged 1–3 years,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 65, pp. 83–88, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
64. L. A. Hilgert, S. C. Leal, J. Mulder, N. H. J. Creugers, and J. E. Frencken, “Caries-preventive effect of supervised toothbrushing and sealants,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1218–1224, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
65. M. H. T. Fung, D. Duangthip, M. C. M. Wong, E. C. M. Lo, and C. H. Chu, “Randomized clinical trial of 12% and 38% silver diamine fluoride treatment,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
66. M. Alkilzy, A. Tarabaih, R. M. Santamaria, and C. H. Splieth, “Self-assembling peptide P11-4 and fluoride for regenerating enamel,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
67. S. Flamee, S. Gizani, C. Caroni, L. Papagiannoulis, and S. Twetman, “Effect of a chlorhexidine/thymol and a fluoride varnish on caries development in erupting permanent molars: a comparative study,” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 449–454, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
68. B. Charugundla, S. Anjum, and M. Mocherla, “Comparative effect of fluoride, essential oil and chlorhexidine mouth rinses on dental plaque and gingivitis in patients with and without dental caries: a randomized controlled trial,” International Journal of Dental Hygiene, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
69. L. Wu, K. Geng, and Q. Gao, “Effects of different anti-caries agents on microhardness and superficial microstructure of irradiated permanent dentin: an in vitro study,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 113, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
70. Y. Xue, Q. Lu, Y. Tian, X. Zhou, L. Cheng, and B. Ren, “Effect of toothpaste containing arginine on dental plaque-A randomized controlled in situ study,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 67, pp. 88–93, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
71. L. Lipták, K. Szabó, G. Nagy, S. Márton, and M. Madléna, “Microbiological changes and caries-preventive effect of an innovative varnish containing chlorhexidine in orthodontic patients,” Caries Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 272–278, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
72. N. Megalaa, K. Thirumurugan, G. Kayalvizhi et al., “A comparative evaluation of the anticaries efficacy of herbal extracts (Tulsi and Black myrobalans) and sodium fluoride as mouthrinses in children: a randomized controlled trial,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 760–767, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
73. B. Latifi-Xhemajli, A. Begzati, J. Veronneau, T. Kutllovci, and A. Rexhepi, “Effectiveness of fluoride varnish four times a year in preventing caries in the primary dentition: a 2 year randomized controlled trial,” Community Dental Health, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
74. C. Anauate-Netto, L. Borelli Neto, R. Amore, V. Di Hipólito, and P. H. P. D’Alpino, “Caries progression in non-cavitated fissures after infiltrant application: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Applied Oral Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 442–454, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
75. R. Mariño, F. Traub, P. Lekfuangfu, and K. Niyomsilp, “Cost-effectiveness analysis of a school-based dental caries prevention program using fluoridated milk in Bangkok, Thailand,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 24, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
76. S. Ntaoutidou, A. Arhakis, K. Tolidis, and N. Kotsanos, “Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive,” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 431–437, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
77. S. León, K. González, F. N. Hugo, K. Gambetta-Tessini, and R. A. Giacaman, “High fluoride dentifrice for preventing and arresting root caries in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 86, pp. 110–117, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
78. P. Muñoz-Millán, C. Zaror, G. Espinoza-Espinoza et al., “Effectiveness of fluoride varnish in preventing early childhood caries in rural areas without access to fluoridated drinking water: a randomized control trial,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
79. B. C. Colvara, D. D. Faustino-Silva, E. Meyer, F. N. Hugo, J. B. Hilgert, and R. K. Celeste, “Motivational interviewing in preventing early childhood caries in primary healthcare: a community-based randomized cluster trial,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 201, pp. 190–195, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
80. S. Khatri, K. Madan, S. Srinivasan, and S. Acharya, “Retention of moisture-tolerant fluoride-releasing sealant and amorphous calcium phosphate-containing sealant in 6–9-year-old children: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
81. U. M. Sköld, “Approximal caries increment in relation to baseline approximal caries prevalence among adolescents in Sweden with and without a school-based fluoride varnish programme,” Community Dental Health, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 281–285, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
82. D. Duangthip, M. C. M. Wong, C. H. Chu, and E. C. M. Lo, “Caries arrest by topical fluorides in preschool children: 30-month results,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 70, pp. 74–79, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
83. G. K. M. Muhoozi, P. Atukunda, A. B. Skaare et al., “Effects of nutrition and hygiene education on oral health and growth among toddlers in rural Uganda: follow-up of a cluster-randomised controlled trial,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 391–404, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
84. B. T. Amaechi, H. Kasundra, L. O. Okoye, P. L. Tran, and T. W. Reid, “Comparative efficacy in preventing plaque formation around pit and fissure sealants: a clinical trial,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 531–536, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
85. D. F. Nóbrega, C. E. Fernández, A. A. Del Bel Cury, L. M. A. Tenuta, and J. A. Cury, “Frequency of fluoride dentifrice use and caries lesions inhibition and repair,” Caries Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
86. I. M. Makeeva, M. A. Polyakova, V. Y. Doroshina, A. Y. Turkina, K. S. Babina, and M. G. Arakelyan, “Comparative effectiveness of therapeutic toothpastes with fluoride and hydroxyapatite,” Stomatologiya, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 34–40, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
87. M. Koopaie, M. Fatahzadeh, S. Jahangir, and R. Bakhtiari, “Comparison of the effect of regular and probiotic cake (Bacillus coagulans) on salivary pH and Streptococcus mutans count,” Dental and Medical Problems, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
88. C. Erbe, V. Klees, F. Braunbeck et al., “Comparative assessment of plaque removal and motivation between a manual toothbrush and an interactive power toothbrush in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances: a single-center, examiner-blind randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 462–472, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
89. J. Villavicencio, L. M. Villegas, M. C. Arango, S. Arias, and F. Triana, “Effects of a food enriched with probiotics on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. salivary counts in preschool children: a cluster randomized trial. Journal of applied oral science,” Revista FOB, vol. 26, Article ID e20170318, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
90. M. M. Ammari, R. C. Jorge, I. P. R. Souza, and V. M. Soviero, “Efficacy of resin infiltration of proximal caries in primary molars: 1-year follow-up of a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1355–1362, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
91. E. Haznedaroglu, S. Guner, C. Duman, and A. A. Mentes, “48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 532–538, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
92. E. Ghasemi, R. Mazaheri, and A. Tahmourespour, “Effect of probiotic yogurt and xylitol-containing chewing gums on salivary S. mutans count,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 257–263, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
93. M. Smitha, S. T. Paul, T. Nagaraj, A. R. Khan, and K. Rinu, “Comparison and clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants on permanent mandibular first molars: an in vivo study,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1151–1158, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
94. C. Gómez, R. Abellán, and J. C. Palma, “Efficacy of photodynamic therapy vs ultrasonic scaler for preventing gingival inflammation and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment,” Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, vol. 24, pp. 377–383, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
95. M. K. Keller, B. J. Klausen, and S. Twetman, “Fluoride varnish or fluoride mouth rinse? A comparative study of two school-based programs,” Community Dental Health, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
96. G. Rodríguez, B. Ruiz, S. Faleiros et al., “Probiotic compared with standard milk for high-caries children,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 402–407, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
97. A. E. Paek, Y. Li, Z. Wang et al., “Caries outcome following an intensive fluoride varnish treatment regimen for children at high risk for early childhood caries,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291–299, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
98. G. Falony, S. Honkala, R. Runnel et al., “Long-term effect of erythritol on dental caries development during childhood: a posttreatment survival analysis,” Caries Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 579–588, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
99. A. Quaranta, O. Marchisio, O. D’Isidoro, A. M. Genovesi, and U. Covani, “Single-blind randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of an interdental cleaning device in orthodontic patients,” Minerva Stomatologica, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 141–147, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
100. F. Perrini, L. Lombardo, A. Arreghini, S. Medori, and G. Siciliani, “Caries prevention during orthodontic treatment: in-vivo assessment of high-fluoride varnish to prevent white spot lesions,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
101. N. Abreu-Placeres, L. E. Garrido, I. C. Jáquez, and L. E. Féliz-Matos, “Does applying fluoride varnish every three months better prevent caries lesions in erupting first permanent molars? A randomised clinical trial,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 541–546, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
102. C. Kirschneck, J.-J. Christl, C. Reicheneder, and P. Proff, “Efficacy of fluoride varnish for preventing white spot lesions and gingivitis during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances-a prospective randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2371–2378, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
103. S. Yadav, V. Sachdev, M. Malik, and R. Chopra, “Effect of three different compositions of topical fluoride varnishes with and without prior oral prophylaxis on Streptococcus mutans count in biofilm samples of children aged 2–8 years: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 286–291, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
104. R. J. Hegde and S. Kamath, “Comparison of the Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus colony count changes in saliva following chlorhexidine (0.12%) mouth rinse, combination mouth rinse, and green tea extract (0.5%) mouth rinse in children,” Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
105. A. Narayan, S. Satyaprasad, S. Anandraj, S. Ananda, P. Kamath, and S. Nandan, “Comparison of efficacy of three chemotherapeutic agents on Streptococcus mutans count in plaque and saliva: a randomized controlled triple blind study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 174–180, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
106. R. Patil, P. Dastoor, and M. Unde, “Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effectiveness of probiotic milk and fluoride mouthrinse on salivary Streptococcus mutans counts and plaque scores in children—an in vivo experimental study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 378–382, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
107. D. Duangthip, C. H. Chu, and E. C. M. Lo, “A randomized clinical trial on arresting dentine caries in preschool children by topical fluorides-18 month results,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 44, pp. 57–63, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
108. D. L. Chi, G. Zegarra, E. C. Vasquez Huerta et al., “Milk sweetened with xylitol: a proof-of-principle caries prevention randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Dentistry for Children (Chicago, Ill.), vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
109. T. Hedayati-Hajikand, U. Lundberg, C. Eldh, and S. Twetman, “Effect of probiotic chewing tablets on early childhood caries - a randomized controlled trial,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 112, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
110. C. H. Kau, J. Wang, A. Palombini, N. Abou-Kheir, and T. Christou, “Effect of fluoride dentifrices on white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: a randomized trial,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 365–371, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
111. M. Kavitha, G. Prathima, G. Kayalvizhi, A. Sanguida, G. Ezhumalai, and V. Ramesh, “Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans serotypes e, f, and k in saliva samples of 6–12-year-old school children before and after a short-term daily intake of the probiotic lozenge,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
112. C. F. Pinto, S. B. Berger, V. Cavalli et al., “In situ antimicrobial activity and inhibition of secondary caries of self-etching adhesives containing an antibacterial agent and/or fluoride,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 167–173, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
113. R. Hegde and J. Thakkar, “Comparative evaluation of the effects of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and xylitol-containing chewing gum on salivary flow rate, pH and buffering capacity in children: an in vivo study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 332–337, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
114. S. M. Bagher, F. M. Hegazi, M. Finkelman et al., “Radiographic effectiveness of resin infiltration in arresting incipient proximal enamel lesions in primary molars,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
115. R. A. Jordan, A. Schulte, A. C. Bockelbrink et al., “Caries-preventive effect of salt fluoridation in preschool children in the Gambia: a prospective, controlled, interventional study,” Caries Research, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 596–604, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
116. S. K. Patil, M. Fatangare, R. G. Jadhav, G. R. Shinde, S. S. Pawar, and M. D. Kathariya, “Caries preventive effect of sodium fluoride varnish on deciduous dentition: a clinical trial,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1190–1193, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
117. J. Homoki, G. Gyémánt, P. Balogh et al., “Sour cherry extract inhibits human salivary α-amylase and growth of Streptococcus mutans (a pilot clinical study),” Food & Function, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 4008–4016, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
118. A. Y. Sanchez, C. L. de Oliveira, T. C. Negrini et al., “In situ effect of arginine-containing dentifrice on plaque composition and on enamel demineralization under distinct cariogenic conditions,” Caries Research, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 588–597, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
119. L. Nemeth, M. Groselj, A. Golez, A. Arhar, I. Frangez, and K. Cankar, “The impact of photobiomodulation of major salivary glands on caries risk,” Lasers in Medical Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 193–203, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
120. S. Dahal, A. Shrestha, and T. Bhagat, “Effectiveness of herbal mouthwash among visually impaired residential school students,” Journal of Nepal Medical Association, vol. 56, no. 212, pp. 728–734, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
121. S. Y. Zhang, H. Dong, and M. Yu, “The effects of different interventions on 12-year-old children’s permanent teeth caries and filling rate in Shanghai Jiading district,” Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 341–344, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
122. M. C. Peters, A. R. Hopkins Jr., and Q. Yu, “Resin infiltration: an effective adjunct strategy for managing high caries risk-A within-person randomized controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 79, pp. 24–30, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
123. N. M. Alamoudi, E. S. Almabadi, E. A. El Ashiry, and D. A. El Derwi, “Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri on salivary cariogenic bacterial counts among groups of preschool children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 331–338, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
124. S. Joshi, M. Sandhu, H. P. S. Sogi, S. Garg, and A. Dhindsa, “Split-mouth randomised clinical trial on the efficacy of GIC sealant on occlusal surfaces of primary second molar,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
125. E. M. R. Neto, L. A. R. Valadas, P. L. D. Lobo et al., “Dose-response evaluation of propolis dental varnish in children: a randomized control study,” Recent Patents on Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
126. H. Meyer-Lueckel, A. Balbach, C. Schikowsky, K. Bitter, and S. Paris, “Pragmatic RCT on the efficacy of proximal caries infiltration,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 531–536, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
127. A. Mishra, R. K. Pandey, and N. Manickam, “Antibacterial effect and physical properties of chitosan and chlorhexidine-cetrimide-modified glass ionomer cements,” Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
128. C. P. C. Sim, J. Wee, Y. Xu, Y.-B. Cheung, Y.-L. Soong, and D. J. Manton, “Anti-caries effect of CPP-ACP in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1005–1011, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
129. S. M. Hammad and M. Knösel, “Efficacy of a new sealant to prevent white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic treatment,” Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 439–445, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
130. J. S. Joshi, N. M. Roshan, B. Sakeenabi, P. Poornima, N. B. Nagaveni, and V. V. Subbareddy, “Inhibition of residual cariogenic bacteria in atraumatic restorative treatment by chlorhexidine: disinfection or incorporation,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 308–312, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
131. M. M. Alabdullah, A. Nabawia, M. A. Ajaj, and H. Saltaji, “Effect of fluoride-releasing resin composite in white spot lesions prevention: a single-centre, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 634–640, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
132. M. Malinowski, K. J. Toumba, S. M. Strafford, and M. S. Duggal, “The effect on dental enamel of the frequency of consumption of fluoridated milk with a cariogenic challenge in situ,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 70, pp. 87–91, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
133. R. Shetty, S. Shetty, S. Janardhanan, S. Shetty, S. Shetty, and K. Raj, “Comparative evaluation of effect of use of toothbrush with paste and munident on levels of Streptococcus mutans and gingival health in children: an in vivo study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
134. O. B. Al-Batayneh, E. I. Bani Hmood, and S. N. Al-Khateeb, “Assessment of the effects of a fluoride dentifrice and GC Tooth Mousse on early caries lesions in primary anterior teeth using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: a randomised clinical trial,” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
135. S. Yassaei and M. N. Motallaei, “The effect of the Er:YAG laser and MI paste plus on the treatment of white spot lesions,” Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
136. S. Gizani, G. Petsi, S. Twetman, C. Caroni, M. Makou, and L. Papagianoulis, “Effect of the probiotic bacteriumLactobacillus reuterion white spot lesion development in orthodontic patients,” The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 85–89, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
137. A. Kumar Jena, S. Pal Singh, and A. Kumar Utreja, “Efficacy of resin-modified glass ionomer cement varnish in the prevention of white spot lesions during comprehensive orthodontic treatment: a split-mouth study,” Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 200–207, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
138. M. D. Ferrer, A. López-López, T. Nicolescu et al., “A pilot study to assess oral colonization and pH buffering by the probiotic Streptococcus dentisani under different dosing regimes,” Odontology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 180–187, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
139. M. Anderson, G. Dahllöf, S. Twetman, L. Jansson, A.-C. Bergenlid, and M. Grindefjord, “Effectiveness of early preventive intervention with semiannual fluoride varnish application in toddlers living in high-risk areas: a stratified cluster-randomized controlled trial,” Caries Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
140. E. Esenlik, E. Uzer Çelik, and E. Bolat, “Efficacy of a casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste in preventing white spot lesions in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a prospective clinical trial,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 274–280, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
141. A. Nishad, N. Sreesan, J. Joy, L. Lakshmanan, J. Thomas, and V. Anjali, “Impact of mouthwashes on antibacterial activity of subjects with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized clinical trial,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1112–1116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
142. L. P. Comar, B. M. Souza, J. Martins, M. G. Santos, M. A. R. Buzalaf, and A. C. Magalhães, “Response of carious enamel to TiF 4 varnish treatment under diverse cariogenic activities in situ,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 63, pp. 81–84, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
143. D. M. da Camara, J. P. Pessan, T. M. Francati, J. A. Santos Souza, M. Danelon, and A. C. B. Delbem, “Synergistic effect of fluoride and sodium hexametaphosphate in toothpaste on enamel demineralization in situ,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1249–1254, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
144. I. M. Makeeva, M. A. Polyakova, O. E. Avdeenko, Y. O. Paramonov, S. A. Kondrat’ev, and A. A. Pilyagina, “Effect of long term application of toothpaste Apadent total care medical nano-hydroxyapatite,” Stomatologiya, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 34–36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
145. P. Rai, R. K. Pandey, and R. Khanna, “Effect of a protective chlorhexidine varnish layer over resin-infiltrated proximal carious lesions in primary teeth,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 40–45, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
146. C.-H. Chu, S. S. Gao, S. K. Li, M. C. Wong, and E. C. Lo, “The effectiveness of the biannual application of silver nitrate solution followed by sodium fluoride varnish in arresting early childhood caries in preschool children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial,” Trials, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 426, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
147. A. N. Fadl, M. M. ElTekeya, K. L. Dowidar, N. Mokhles, and M. M. El Tantawi, “Effect of tooth mousse on Streptococcus mutans in the plaque of high caries-risk preschool children: a triple-blind, randomized clinical trial,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 300–304, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
148. N. C. W. Kaaij, M. H. Veen, M. A. E. Kaaij, and J. M. Cate, “A prospective, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial on the effects of a fluoride rinse on white spot lesion development and bleeding in orthodontic patients,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
149. R. A. Bagramian, F. Garcia-Godoy, and A. R. Volpe, “The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
150. W. M. Thomson, “Dental caries experience in older people over time: what can the large cohort studies tell us?” British Dental Journal, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 89–92, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
151. O. Fejerskov and E. Kidd, Dental Caries: The Disease and its Clinical Management, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
152. O. Norderyd and Å. Wahlin, Impact of Risk-Based Prevention on Public Oral Health. Risk Assessment in Oral Health:, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2020.
153. S. Khazaei, M. S. Firouzei, S. Sadeghpour et al., “Edentulism and tooth loss in Iran: SEPAHAN systematic review,” International Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 3, no. Suppl1, pp. S42–7, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
154. I. Polzer, M. Schimmel, F. Müller, and R. Biffar, “Edentulism as part of the general health problems of elderly adults,” International Dental Journal, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 143–155, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
155. M. E. Sanders, “Probiotics: definition, sources, selection, and uses,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, no. s2, pp. S58–S61, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
156. S. Twetman, “Prevention of dental caries as a non‐communicable disease,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 126, no. S1, pp. 19–25, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
157. M. M. Nascimento, C. Browngardt, X. Xiaohui, V. Klepac-Ceraj, B. J. Paster, and R. A. Burne, “The effect of arginine on oral biofilm communities,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
158. E. Figuero, D. F. Nóbrega, M. García-Gargallo, L. M. A. Tenuta, D. Herrera, and J. C. Carvalho, “Mechanical and chemical plaque control in the simultaneous management of gingivitis and caries: a systematic review,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 44, pp. S116–S134, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
159. A. Mira, A. Simon-Soro, and M. A. Curtis, “Role of microbial communities in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases and caries,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 44, pp. S23–S38, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
160. V. N. Stone and P. Xu, “Targeted antimicrobial therapy in the microbiome era,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 446–454, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
161. M. Yazdanian, A. Rahmani, E. Tahmasebi, H. Tebyanian, A. Yazdanian, and S. A. Mosaddad, “Current and advanced nanomaterials in dentistry as regeneration agents: an update,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 899–918, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
162. B. T. Rosier, P. D. Marsh, and A. Mira, “Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 371–380, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
163. D. Campoccia, L. Montanaro, and C. R. Arciola, “A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, pp. 8533–8554, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
164. M. Cloutier, D. Mantovani, and F. Rosei, “Antibacterial coatings: challenges, perspectives, and opportunities,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 637–652, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
165. D. G. Moussa and C. Aparicio, “Targeting the oral plaque microbiome with immobilized anti-biofilm peptides at tooth-restoration interfaces,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, Article ID e0235283, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
166. S. M. d. F. Lima, G. M. de Pádua, M. G. d. C. Sousa, M. d. S. Freire, O. L. Franco, and T. M. B. Rezende, “Antimicrobial peptide-based treatment for endodontic infections—biotechnological innovation in endodontics,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 203–213, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
167. A. Jain, L. S. Duvvuri, S. Farah, N. Beyth, A. J. Domb, and W. Khan, “Antimicrobial polymers,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1969–1985, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
168. G. C. Padovani, V. P. Feitosa, S. Sauro et al., “Advances in dental materials through nanotechnology: facts, perspectives and toxicological aspects,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 621–636, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
169. F. Paladini, M. Pollini, A. Sannino, and L. Ambrosio, “Metal-based antibacterial substrates for biomedical applications,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1873–1885, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
170. S. Yassaei, A. Nasr, H. Zandi, and M. N. Motallaei, “Comparison of antibacterial effects of orthodontic composites containing different nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans at different times,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 52–60, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
171. A. B. Seabra, G. Z. Justo, and P. S. Haddad, “State of the art, challenges and perspectives in the design of nitric oxide-releasing polymeric nanomaterials for biomedical applications,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1370–1379, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
172. K. Feghali, M. Feldman, V. D. La, J. Santos, and D. Grenier, “Cranberry proanthocyanidins: natural weapons against periodontal diseases,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 23, pp. 5728–5735, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
173. P. W. Taylor, J. M. T. Hamilton-Miller, and P. D. Stapleton, “Antimicrobial properties of green tea catechins,” Food Science Technology Bulletin: Functional Foods, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 71–81, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
174. W. H. Bowen, R. A. Burne, H. Wu, and H. Koo, “Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 229–242, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
175. J. E. Koopman, M. A. Hoogenkamp, M. J. Buijs et al., “Changes in the oral ecosystem induced by the use of 8% arginine toothpaste,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 73, pp. 79–87, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
176. J. Li, Z. Huang, L. Mei, G. Li, and H. Li, “Anti-caries effect of arginine-containing formulations in vivo: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Caries Research, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 606–617, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
177. X. Huang, K. Zhang, M. Deng et al., “Effect of arginine on the growth and biofilm formation of oral bacteria,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 82, pp. 256–262, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
178. F. J. Xu, K. G. Neoh, and E. T. Kang, “Bioactive surfaces and biomaterials via atom transfer radical polymerization,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 719–761, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
179. N. B. Pitts, D. T. Zero, P. D. Marsh et al., “Dental caries,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID 17030, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
180. R. Giacaman, “Sugars and beyond. The role of sugars and the other nutrients and their potential impact on caries,” Oral Diseases, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1185–1197, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
181. D. Head, D. A. Devine, and P. D. Marsh, “In silico modelling to differentiate the contribution of sugar frequency versus total amount in driving biofilm dysbiosis in dental caries,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 17413, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
182. World Health Organization, Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
183. P. Moynihan, “Sugars and dental caries: evidence for setting a recommended threshold for intake,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–156, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
184. H. Jamel, A. Plasschaert, and A. Sheiham, “Dental caries experience and availability of sugars in Iraqi children before and after the United Nations sanctions,” International Dental Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
185. B. I. Truman, B. F. Gooch, I. Sulemana et al., “Reviews of evidence on interventions to prevent dental caries, oral and pharyngeal cancers, and sports-related craniofacial injuries,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1 Suppl, pp. 21–54, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
186. E. Söderling, M. ElSalhy, E. Honkala et al., “Effects of short-term xylitol gum chewing on the oral microbiome,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
187. G. Campus, M. G. Cagetti, S. Sale et al., “Six months of high-dose xylitol in high-risk caries subjects-a 2-year randomised, clinical trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 785–791, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
188. K. K. Mäkinen, “Sugar alcohol sweeteners as alternatives to sugar with special consideration of xylitol,” Medical Principles and Practice, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 303–320, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
189. E. M. Söderling, “Xylitol, mutans streptococci, and dental plaque,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
190. M. Hrimech, D. Mayrand, D. Grenier, and L. Trahan, “Xylitol disturbs protein synthesis, including the expression of HSP-70 and HSP-60, in Streptococcus mutans,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 249–257, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
191. S. Furness, H. V. Worthington, G. Bryan, S. Birchenough, and R. McMillan, “Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, Article ID CD008934, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
192. P. D. Marsh and D. A. Devine, “How is the development of dental biofilms influenced by the host?” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 38, no. s11, pp. 28–35, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
193. M. M. Nascimento, Y. Liu, R. Kalra et al., “Oral arginine metabolism may decrease the risk for dental caries in children,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 604–608, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
194. X. Zheng, J. He, L. Wang et al., “Ecological effect of arginine on oral microbiota,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7206, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
195. W. M. Avila, I. A. Pordeus, S. M. Paiva, and C. Martins, “Breast feeding as risk factors for dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0142922, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
196. R. Tham, G. Bowatte, S. Dharmage et al., “Breastfeeding and the risk of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 104, no. 467, pp. 62–84, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
197. G. Reid, J. A. Younes, H. C. Van der Mei, G. B. Gloor, R. Knight, and H. J. Busscher, “Microbiota restoration: natural and supplemented recovery of human microbial communities,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
198. D. Gruner, S. Paris, and F. Schwendicke, “Probiotics for managing caries and periodontitis: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 48, pp. 16–25, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
199. N. Romani Vestman, T. Chen, P. Lif Holgerson, C. Ohman, and I. Johansson, “Oral microbiota shift after 12-week supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289; a randomized control trial,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e0125812, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
200. M. R. Jørgensen, G. Castiblanco, S. Twetman, and M. K. Keller, “Prevention of caries with probiotic bacteria during early childhood. Promising but inconsistent findings,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 127–131, 2016. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mohammad Nima Motallaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.