The Herbal Formula Granule Prescription Mahuang Decoction Ameliorated Chronic Kidney Disease Which Was Associated with Restoration of Dysbiosis of Intestinal Microbiota in Rats
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a global health issue, and there is increasing evidence showing the beneficial roles of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in CKD treatment. Here, we studied the renoprotective role of Mahuang decoction, a famous TCM prescription, in a rat CKD model induced with the combination of doxorubicin and adenine. Our data showed that intragastric administration of Mahuang decoction inhibited the loss of bodyweight and attenuated proteinuria, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen in CKD rats. Kidney histological analysis revealed decreased tubulointerstitial injury and fibrosis in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction accompanied with suppressed expression of TGF-β1 and phosphorylated NF-κB/P65 (p-P65) as indicated by immunohistochemistry. ELISA analysis demonstrated reduced serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-6. Most importantly, intestinal microbiota analysis by 16s rRNA-seq showed that Mahuang decoction restored the impaired richness and diversity of intestinal microflora and recovered the disrupted microbial community through reducing the abundance of deleterious microbes and promoting the expansion of beneficial microbes in CKD rats. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that Mahuang decoction mitigated kidney functional and structural impairment in CKD rats which were associated with the restoration of dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota, implying its potential in clinical CKD treatment.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by long-term impairment of renal function (reduced glomerular filtration rate or increased excretion of urinary albumin or both) and has become a global health issue. The incidence of CKD is estimated to be 8–16% worldwide . In China, the national cross-sectional screen revealed a prevalence of about 10.8% . Without proper medical intervention, CKD can progress into end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with lethal cardiovascular complications. Although multiple treatments have been applied which mainly focus on the control of blood pressure, lipid, glucose, immune reaction, and lifestyle, the outcome remains poor with high cost while ESRD occurs in many patients . Therefore, there is an urgent demand to develop new drugs for effective CKD therapy.
Intestinal microbiota constitutes an important part of the human body and maintains a symbiotic ecosystem in healthy conditions. The dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota is associated with diverse disorders including CKD in both patient and animal models [3, 4]. In CKD, impaired renal function leads to increased blood urea. The diffusion of urea into the gut lumen reshapes the biochemical milieu which facilitates the propagation of urease- and uricase-containing bacteria, leading to the production of ammonia and ammonium hydroxide which damage the integrity of intestinal mucosa and enhance its permeability [3, 5]. This results in the elevated level of intestinal bacteria-originated uremic toxins in the circulation, which causes systemic inflammation as featured in CKD [5, 6]. Furthermore, the changed intestinal luminal milieu may also facilitate the expansion of proteolytic bacteria which produce uremic toxins (e.g., indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol) and suppress the growth of saccharolytic bacteria which can generate short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), a group of metabolites beneficial to intestinal mucosal barrier integrity and enterocyte energy supply. Thus, this further promotes the disruption of intestinal integrity [3, 7]. Animal and clinical studies demonstrated that modification of intestinal microbiota through dietary intervention or supplement of prebiotics or probiotics can attenuate serum levels of uremic toxins, inflammation, and the severity of CKD [8, 9].
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), mainly in the form of herbal medicine, is widely used to treat diseases including CKD in China and other countries in east Asia. During the thousands of years’ practice, many classical TCM prescriptions have been developed for the clinical treatment of kidney disease. Moreover, numerous preclinical studies and clinical trials have validated the renoprotective roles of specific TCM prescriptions, individual TCM herbal ingredients, or its derivatives [10–12]. Recently, a large-scale retrospective cohort study reported that TCM is beneficial for the long-term survival of CKD patients .
Mahuang decoction (“Mahuang Soup” in Chinese) is a famous prescription recorded in TCM document Treatise on Febrile Diseases. Mahuang decoction consists of four herbal ingredients, Ephedrae Herba (Mahuang), Cinnamomi Ramulus, Armeniacae Semen Amarum, and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Praeparata cum Melle. According to the TCM theory, Mahuang decoction functions by stimulating perspiration, enhancing the breath of the lung, and mitigating asthma. In clinical practice, Mahuang decoction is usually used to treat cold, chronic bronchitis, bronchial asthma, and so on . In this study, we firstly investigated the renoprotective role of Mahuang decoction in CKD.
The standard prescription of Mahuang decoction is composed of 28.6% of Ephedrae Herba (w/w), 34.2% Cinnamomi Ramulus (w/w), 28.6% Armeniacae Semen Amarum (w/w), and 8.6% Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Praeparata cum Melle (w/w). All individual herbal drugs were purchased in the form of herbal formula granules manufactured by Sichuan Neo-Green Pharmaceutical Development Co., Ltd (China) in compliance with the standards of national good manufacturing practices (GMP, V.2010) released by the Health Ministry of China. Herbal formula granule was made from single conventional herbal medicine by water extraction, concentration, and drying, which has equivalent pharmaceutical effects compared with its original herbal medicine and is more convenient and stable. The individual herbal formula granules were blended in warm water freshly before animal administration.
2.2. CKD Rat Model and Drug Administration
12-week-old male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from the Animal Experimental Center of Southwest Medical University and subject to adaptive feeding for 1 week. Rats were maintained in a specific-pathogen free facility with 12 h light/dark cycle and free access to food and water. For CKD model construction, the rats were given a single intravenous injection of 4 mg/kg doxorubicin (Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Inc., China) through tail vein followed by daily administration of 200 mg/kg adenine (Sigma, cat# A8626, USA) by gavage for 4 weeks. The rats with 24 h proteinuria larger than 50 mg were considered successful in CKD induction. Then, the CKD rats were randomly allocated into 5 groups: CKD model group (n = 10), Mahuang decoction treatment groups (low, middle, and high dose, n = 10, respectively), and valsartan treatment group (n = 10, positive control group). Rats in the Mahuang decoction treatment group were subject to the administration of 0.3 g/kg/day (low dose) or 0.6 g/kg/day (middle dose) or 1.2 g/kg/day (high dose) of Mahuang decoction by gavage for 4 weeks. Rats in the valsartan group were treated with 13 mg/kg/day valsartan by gavage for 4 weeks, while rats in the CKD model group were treated with saline in the same way. In addition, a group of healthy rats (n = 10) with the treatment of the only saline was used as normal control.
At the end of the treatment, 24 h urine was collected in a metabolic cage for each rat. After anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg), the rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Blood was drained through the abdominal aorta followed by serum isolation by centrifugation and stored at −80°C. The kidneyswere fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24h followed by paraffin embedding. All animal experiments in this study were approved and carried out in accordance with corresponding regulations of the animal experimental ethics committee of the Southwest Medical University.
2.3. 24 h Proteinuria, Serum Creatinine, and BUN
Quantification of 24 h proteinuria, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was performed by an automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray, BS-380, China).
2.4. HE and Masson’s Trichrome Staining
HE and Masson’s trichrome staining were performed with the HE staining kit (Beyotime, cat# C0105, China) and Masson staining kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotech. cat# D026, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, respectively. The renal tubulointerstitial injury index was calculated by considering the degree of tubular structure abnormality, tubular protein cast, interstitial inflammation, and fibrosis based on the HE and Masson’s trichrome staining as previously described . The fibrotic area was quantified with Image J software (NIH, USA).
The 4 μm paraffin kidney sections were deparaffined in xylene and rehydrated in gradient ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked in 3% H2O2 for 30 min. Antigen retrieval was performed in 0.01 M citrate acid solution (pH 6.0) for 10 min in microwave. Next, the sections were blocked with 2.5% BSA for 1 h followed by primary antibody incubation overnight at 4°C. The next day, the sections were washed with PBS 3 times for 5 min each time. Then, the biotin-streptavidin detection system (ZSGB-Bio, cat# SP-9000, China) was used to probe the primary antibody following the recommended instruction. The signals were developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) with the nucleus counter-stained with hematoxylin. Photos were captured with a light microscope equipped with a camera (Leica, DM500, Germany). Image J 1.47v software was used to quantify the staining intensity or positively stained nucleus. Primary antibodies used were anti-TGF-β1 (Boster-Bio, cat# BA0290, China, dilution ratio 1 : 100) and anti-phosphorylated NF-κB/P65 (Santa Cruz, cat# sc-135769, USA, dilution ratio 1 : 100).
Serum TNFα and IL-6 levels were determined with rat TNFα ELISA kit (Newbioscience, cat# ERC102a, China) and IL-6 ELISA kit (Newbioscience, cat# ECR003, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
2.7. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
For microbiome analysis, fresh feces were collected during the grabbing operation before sacrificing the animals and stored at −80°C. Total fecal DNA was isolated with the fecal genomic DNA isolation kit (Tiangen Biotech. cat# DP382, China). The V3 region of the 16S rRNA was amplified. The amplicon library was constructed with the Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit (Thermo Scientific, cat# 4471252, USA) followed by sequencing with Ion PGM™ System (Thermo Scientific, cat# 4462921, USA). Sequencing data was filtered with FASTX Toolkit 0.0.13 software, and clean reads were aligned with the Silva database by QIIME software to generate operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The microbiota diversity analysis (Shannon diversity index, rarefaction curve) was performed by Mothur software (release 1.36.0). To study the microbiota difference among different samples, a weighted UniFrac distance matrix was generated with Mothur software. Then, the weighted UniFrac PCoA was conducted with QIIME software. Permutation multivariate analysis (ERMANOVA) with Adonis test was performed based on weighted UniFrac distance matrix in RStudio software. Population constitution analysis of representative samples was generated by directly plotting the bacterial proportion at the family level by GraphPad Prism software.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
GraphPad Prism software was used for graph plotting and statistical analysis unless where indicated. Data were presented as the means ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons of quantitative data.
3.1. Mahuang Decoction Improved Renal Function in CKD Rats
To explore whether Mahuang decoction would protect renal function in CKD, we firstly induced CKD in rats with a combination of doxorubicin and adenine as described in the method. The CKD rats were then given Mahuang decoction by gavage at a dose of 0.3 (low), or 0.6 (middle), or 1.2 g/kg/day (high) for 4 weeks. A group of CKD rats receiving valsartan (13 mg/kg/day), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist showing renoprotective function in CKD , was included to serve as a positive control. Each group contained 10 animals. Two animals died of severe end-stage renal disease in the CKD group without treatment. As shown in Figure 1(a), the CKD rats showed remarkable bodyweight loss at the end of the experiment compared with the start time point. However, Mahuang decoction treatment not only prevented the bodyweight loss but also slightly increased the bodyweight at all dose levels in CKD rats, indicating improved life quality. Nevertheless, valsartan failed to prevent bodyweight loss in CKD rats.
At the end of the treatment, CKD rats had significantly impaired renal function as demonstrated by remarkably increased proteinuria, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) compared with the control healthy rats. Mahuang decoction treatment notably reduced the proteinuria and serum creatinine in a dose-dependent manner in CKD rats. BUN level also decreased upon Mahuang decoction treatment although no dose-dependent effect was observed (Figures 1(b)–1(d)). Moreover, Mahuang decoction revealed a relatively better renoprotective effect than valsartan (Figures 1(b)–1(d)).
3.2. Mahuang Decoction Ameliorated Structural Injury of the Kidney in CKD Rats
Next, we investigated whether the improvement of renal function was accompanied by amelioration of structural injury of the kidney tissue in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction. As shown in Figure 2(a), HE staining of CKD kidney section revealed robust dilation of tubules and expansion of the interstitial area. On the contrary, treatment with Mahuang decoction mitigated the dilation of tubules (especially in the high dose group) and decreased the expansion of the interstitium. However, valsartan had weak benefits on the improvement of kidney structure in CKD. Semiquantitative analysis based on the severity of tubulointerstitial injury also showed that the overall structural abnormality was ameliorated after Mahuang decoction treatment although without dose-dependent effect (Figure 2(b)).
3.3. Mahuang Decoction Treatment Suppressed Fibrosis and Inflammation in CKD Rats
Chronic fibrosis and inflammation are key drivers of CKD progression [16, 17]. We next explored whether Mahuang decoction could improve fibrosis and inflammation in CKD rats. Masson's trichrome staining was used to evaluate the fibrosis of kidney tissue. As shown in Figure 3(a), CKD rats showed massive fibrosis in the peritubular region. After treatment with Mahuang decoction, the fibrosis was mitigated, which was more pronounced in the high dose group. Quantification of the fibrotic area also confirmed the relieved renal fibrosis in the Mahuang decoction (high dose)-treated rats (Figure 3(b)). Furthermore, IHC analysis indicated massive expression of TGF-β1 in the CKD kidney which was dose-dependently suppressed by Mahuang decoction treatment, while valsartan treatment has a weak influence on TGF-β1 expression (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).
Using IHC, we also detected the expression of phosphorylated NF-κB/p65 (p-P65), the master regulator of the NF-κB inflammatory pathway . As illustrated in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), CKD rats showed significantly increased cells with nuclear staining of p-P65, which was mitigated by Mahuang decoction suggesting the inhibition of inflammatory pathway. We further determined the levels of inflammatory cytokines in the circulation and found that CKD rats had remarkably elevated serum levels of TNFα and IL-6, which were partially reversed by Mahuang decoction treatment (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). In contrast, valsartan showed minimal improvement of p-P65 expression and serum levels of TNFα and IL-6. These data indicate that Mahuang decoction can ameliorate fibrosis and inflammation in CKD rats with better efficacy than valsartan.
3.4. Mahuang Decoction Treatment Restored Dysbiosis of Intestinal Microbiota in CKD Rats
Intestinal microbial dysbiosis is reported to be associated with CKD, and restoration of the microbiota dysbiosis renders beneficial effects on renal function in CKD . We next investigated whether intestinal microbiota was influenced in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction. We performed 16s rRNA sequencing with feces samples from healthy rats, control CKD rats, and CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction, respectively. In silico analysis showed that, compared with the healthy rats, the richness of intestinal microbiota was largely reduced in CKD rats as revealed by decreased total identified OTUs in the feces sample (Figure 5(a)). The diminished microbiota richness was also evidenced by the rarefaction curve analysis (Figure 5(b)). Furthermore, CKD rats presented decreased taxon diversity of intestinal microbiota as indicated by Shannon index analysis (Figure 5(c)). However, the impaired bacterial richness and diversity were largely recovered in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction (Figures 5(a)–5(c)). In addition, the weighted UniFrac PCoA plotting revealed that CKD rats showed globally distinct intestinal microbial community structure compared with the healthy rats and Mahuang decoction-treated rats, although the statistical analysis showed no significance among groups (PERMANOVA with Adnois test, pseudo-F = 1.35, R2 = 0.35, = 0.23) which may be caused by the small sample size (n = 3 for each group) and robust intragroup divergence especially in CKD rats (Figure 5(d)). Furthermore, plotting of the bacterial proportion at the family level in each group showed that CKD rats presented a notably disrupted intestinal bacterial constitution compared with that of the healthy rats. However, this disruption was generally mitigated in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction (Figure 5(e)).
3.5. Mahuang Decoction Treatment Promoted the Propagation of Beneficial Intestinal Bacteria but Suppressed the Expansion of Deleterious Bacteria
It is interesting to note that, among the bacteria with different richness between healthy and CKD rats at the family level, the abundance of Helicobacteraceae and Enterobacteriaceae was largely increased in the CKD rats (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). It should be noted that bacteria from both of the two families possess the coding gene of urease and can convert urea into ammonia or ammonia hydroxide, which can damage the intestinal mucosa [3, 19]. Furthermore, bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae are responsible for the production of uremic toxins, like indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate . Enterobacteriaceae bacteria also contribute to bloodstream infection in patients with hepatorenal failure . On the other hand, the richness of a group of saccharolytic bacteria from Prevotellaceae and Bacteroidales S24-7, which can produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) beneficial for intestinal epithelial integrity and function [3, 21], decreased remarkably in CKD rats (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). In the healthy rats, Prevotellaceae and Bacteroidales S24-7 constituted an average of 26.35% and 10.9% of the microbiota, respectively (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). However, their proportions decreased to less than 1% in CKD rats. In contrast, the disrupted abundance of the above bacteria was restored in CKD rats with the administration of Mahuang decoction. Collectively, CKD rats exhibited expansion of detrimental bacteria and contraction of probiotics while Mahuang decoction restored the disturbed balance of intestinal microbiota in CKD.
The classical TCM prescription Mahuang decoction has been used for thousands of years to treat many diseases under the guidance of TCM theory in China. Up to now, no published study reported its role in kidney disease. In this study, we explored the therapeutic effects of Mahuang decoction in CKD rats induced by doxorubicin and adenine. Our data showed that Mahuang decoction ameliorated impaired function (reducing proteinuria, serum creatinine, and BUN) and structure (suppressing tissue injury and fibrosis) of the diseased kidney. Local (kidney) and systemic inflammations (blood) were also relieved. Most importantly, we found that Mahuang decoction restored the dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota, including recovery of the diversity and richness of intestinal flora, rebalance of the bacterial community by augmenting beneficial microbes, and suppressing detrimental microbes.
According to the principle of TCM theory, the therapeutic role of individual herbal medicine is ranked based on its contribution to disease treatment in a standard TCM prescription. In Mahuang decoction, Ephedrae Herba is believed to be the principal component. However, the role of Ephedrae Herba in kidney function remains controversial. It was reported that short-term infusion of ephedrine, one of the major pharmaceutically active extracts from Ephedrae Herba, promotes kidney function in humans . Nevertheless, there is one case report showing that long-term consumption of Ephedrae Herba extract is associated with nephrolithiasis . Combined with the findings in our study, it can be speculated that Ephedrae Herba indeed executes a renoprotective function, but the dose, medical formula, and delivery strategy should be carefully supervised in a disease-dependent context. The left three herbal medicines, Cinnamomi Ramulus, Armeniacae Semen Amarum, and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Praeparata cum Melle (also licorice), are believed to synergize the role of Ephedrae Herba in Mahuang decoction and are widely used herbal medicines in many other TCM prescriptions. Extracts of Cinnamomi Ramulus suppressed the activation of high glucose-stimulated mesangial cells and showed a renoprotective role in the experimental glomerulonephritis mouse [24, 25]. Armeniacae Semen Amarum was reported to protect the kidney from methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity by eliminating oxidative stress . Extracts of licorice protected the kidney from cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury [27, 28]. In consideration of the above multitherapeutic roles, we speculated that all the four herbal medicines in the Mahuang decoction contributed to the treatment of CKD in this study.
Temporary restrained inflammation and fibrosis contribute to the adaptive recovery of acute kidney injury. However, persistent and uncontrolled inflammation and fibrosis, which are common features of CKD, are harmful to long-term renal function . Fibrosis is characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix in the interstitial area leading to contraction and destruction of the functional renal structures. TGF-β/Smad signal dominates the profibrogenic mechanisms, where TGF-β1 is the principal causal profibrogenic ligand secreted by various cell types in the CKD kidney . The CKD rats receiving Mahuang decoction demonstrated decreased fibrosis with attenuated TGF-β1 expression in the kidney, indicating that Mahuang decoction has antifibrotic activity by targeting TGF-β/Smad signaling (Figure 4).
As another important feature of CKD, inflammation is inversely related to renal function . NF-κB protein complexes are the center integrator of inflammatory signals . The attenuated expression of NF-κB/P65 in the kidney tissue indicated that Mahuang decoction can suppress the inflammatory signaling in the CKD kidney. Furthermore, chronic inflammation is proven to be systemic but not limited to the kidney. The proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines can come from extrarenal tissue, like fat, skeleton muscle, and liver [30, 31]. In recent years, intestinal bacteria-derived endotoxins are also recognized as an important source of proinflammatory factors in CKD [8, 16]. In this study, we observed increased propagation of urease- and endotoxin-producing bacteria Helicobacteraceae and Enterobacteriaceae and contraction of SCFAs-producing bacteria Prevotellaceae and Bacteroidales S24-7 (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)). This may enhance the permeability of intestinal epithelia and translocation of endotoxin (even pathogenic bacteria) into the circulation, resulting in augmented systemic inflammation [8,9]. The restored dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota and decreased circulatory levels of TNFα and IL-6 in CKD rats treated with Mahuang decoction implies that Mahuang decoction inhibits inflammation at least partially by suppressing the intestinal microbiota-derived proinflammatory insults (Figures 4(c)and 4(d)).
Among the bacteria with ectopic propagation, Helicobacteraceae attracts our interest as bacteria from this family are usually colonized in the stomach . However, the relative richness of Helicobacteraceae increased averagely from 0.68% in healthy rats to 14.15% in CKD rats (Figure 6(a)). Bacterium from the Helicobacteraceae family is rarely reported to be associated with kidney disease except forHelicobacter pylori, which has a controversial relationship with CKD . However, we failed to identify Helicobacter pylori at the species level in the fecal microbiota from CKD rats in our study (data not shown). This means that there exist unidentified bacterial species from the Helicobacteraceae family which may be associated with CKD. Enterobacteriaceae is another bacterial family showing increased richness in CKD rats in our study (Figure 6(b)). This is consistent with the clinical finding that Enterobacteriaceae presents an expansion in the intestinal microbiota of ESRD patients [3, 33].
Prevotellaceae and Bacteroidales S24-7 belong to Bacteroidetes, which is one of the three bacterial phyla dominating human and animal intestinal microflora [21, 34, 35]. In our study, Prevotellaceae, whose richness was robustly diminished in CKD, is the most abundant bacterial family in the healthy rats (Figure 6(c)). In line with our data, the decreased richness of Prevotellaceae was observed in CKD rats induced by 5/6 nephrectomy and in ESRD patients [33, 35]. Bacteroidales S24-7 also constitutes a considerable portion of the microflora in healthy rats and presents significantly decreased richness in CKD rats (Figure 6(d)). In contrast to our data, it is reported that the richness of Bacteroidales S24-7 increases in ESRD patients and CKD rats [36, 37]. Given the evidence showing that Bacteroidales S24-7 may function as a prebiotic , the relationship between Bacteroidales S24-7 and CKD needs further investigation.
The TCM usually contains multiple active pharmaceutical components in a given prescription or a single herbal medicine and may target different pathological processes simultaneously during disease treatment. Therefore, we should note that the observed renoprotective effects of Mahuang decoction should be ascribed to the multiple active components which may synergistically target the various aspects of CKD pathogenesis but not limited to the intestinal microbiota. More studies based on purified active pharmaceutical components are needed for a deeper insight into the renoprotective mechanism of Mahuang decoction in CKD treatment in the future.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Mahuang decoction mitigates kidney damage in CKD. The renoprotective role of Mahuang decoction is associated with the amelioration of dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota. These findings indicated the therapeutic potential of Mahuang decoction for clinical CKD treatment.
|CKD:||Chronic kidney disease|
|TCM:||Traditional Chinese medicine|
|BUN:||Blood urea nitrogen|
|ELISA:||Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay|
|ESRD:||End-stage renal disease|
|SCFAs:||Short-chain fatty acids|
|OUT:||Operational taxonomic unit.|
The list of OTUs identified in each rat feces sample by 16S rRNA sequencing is available in the figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8947478.v2. Other data would be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
HCS designed the study. YM, SJC, CLX, SZ, and XZ conducted the experiments. YM, SJC, and HLW analyzed the data. YM wrote the manuscript. HLW, XYL, QZ, JMF, LW, and HCS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. Yao Ming and Sijing Cheng contributed equally to this study.
This study was supported by grants from the Administration Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Sichuan Province (2018JC032) to HCS and the Supporting Program of Science and Technology Administration Department of Sichuan Province (14ZC0027) to JMF.
V. Jha, G. Garcia-Garcia, K. Iseki et al., “Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives,” Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9888, pp. 260–272, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhang, F. Wang, L. Wang et al., “Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey,” Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9818, pp. 815–822, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. Wong, Y. M. Piceno, T. Z. DeSantis, M. Pahl, G. L. Andersen, and N. D. Vaziri, “Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 230–237, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
E. Mishima, S. Fukuda, H. Shima et al., “Alteration of the intestinal environment by lubiprostone is associated with amelioration of adenine-induced CKD,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1787–1794, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
N. D. Vaziri, J. Yuan, and K. Norris, “Role of urea in intestinal barrier dysfunction and disruption of epithelial tight junction in chronic kidney disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
N. D. Vaziri, J. Yuan, A. Rahimi, Z. Ni, H. Said, and V. S. Subramanian, “Disintegration of colonic epithelial tight junction in uremia: a likely cause of CKD-associated inflammation,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2686–2693, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Donohoe, N. Garge, X. Zhang et al., “The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 517–526, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
S. Cigarran Guldris, E. Gonzalez Parra, and A. Cases Amenos, “Gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease,” Nefrologia, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
L. Koppe, D. Mafra, and D. Fouque, “Probiotics and chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 958–966, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhong, Y. Deng, Y. Chen, P. Y. Chuang, and J. Cijiang He, “Therapeutic use of traditional Chinese herbal medications for chronic kidney diseases,” Kidney International, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1108–1118, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
K. C. Huang, Y. C. Su, M. F. Sun, and S. T. Huang, “Chinese herbal medicine improves the long-term survival rate of patients with chronic kidney disease in taiwan: a nationwide retrospective population-based cohort study,” Frontier Pharmacology, vol. 9, p. 1117, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
X. Li and H. Wang, “Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of chronic kidney disease,” Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 276–281, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
G. Wen, “Mahuang decoction treatment of miscellaneous disease exploration [Chinese],” China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 3583–3585, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
M. W. Taal, K. Zandi-Nejad, B. Weening et al., “Proinflammatory gene expression and macrophage recruitment in the rat remnant kidney,” Kidney International, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1664–1676, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
T. Ecder, “Renal and metabolic effects of valsartan,” The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. S14–S19, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
O. M. Akchurin and F. Kaskel, “Update on inflammation in chronic kidney disease,” Blood Purification, vol. 39, no. 1-3, pp. 84–92, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
X. M. Meng, P. M. Tang, J. Li, and H. Y. Lan, “TGF-beta/Smad signaling in renal fibrosis,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 6, p. 82, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
T. Liu, L. Zhang, D. Joo, and S. C. Sun, “NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 2, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
A. K. Patra and J. R. Aschenbach, “Ureases in the gastrointestinal tracts of ruminant and monogastric animals and their implication in urea-N/ammonia metabolism: a review,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 13, pp. 39–50, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
A. R. Soliman, R. M. Ahmed, A. Abdalla, M. Soliman, and M. Saeed, “Impact of Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia on survival in patients with hepatorenal failure,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Disease and Transplantation, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1311–1319, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
K. L. Ormerod, D. L. Wood, N. Lachner et al., “Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals,” Microbiome, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 36, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
L. Westman, B. Hamberger, and P. O. Jarnberg, “Effects of ephedrine on renal function in patients after major vascular surgery,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 271–277, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
T. Powell, F. F. Hsu, J. Turk, and K. Hruska, “Ma-huang strikes again: ephedrine nephrolithiasis,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 153–159, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
Q. Luo, S. M. Wang, Q. Lu, J. Luo, and Y. X. Cheng, “Identification of compounds from the water soluble extract of Cinnamomum cassia barks and their inhibitory effects against high-glucose-induced mesangial cells,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 10930–10943, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
H. Nagai, T. Shimazawa, T. Takizawa, A. Koda, A. Yagi, and I. Nishioka, “Immunopharmacological studies of the aqueous extract of Cinnamomum cassia (CCAq). II. Effect of CCAq on experimental glomerulonephritis,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 823–831, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
N. Vardi, H. Parlakpinar, B. Ates, A. Cetin, and A. Otlu, “The protective effects of Prunus armeniaca L (apricot) against methotrexate-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis in rat kidney,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Ju, M. S. Kim, Y. S. Jo et al., “Licorice and its active compound glycyrrhizic acid ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity through inactivation of p53 by scavenging ROS and overexpression of p21 in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 890–899, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Black, J. M. Lever, and A. Agarwal, “Renal inflammation and fibrosis: a double-edged sword,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 663–681, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
G. Garibotto, A. Sofia, V. Procopio et al., “Peripheral tissue release of interleukin-6 in patients with chronic kidney diseases: effects of end-stage renal disease and microinflammatory state,” Kidney International, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 384–390, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Fried, D. A. Bunkin, and A. S. Greenberg, “Omental and subcutaneous adipose tissues of obese subjects release interleukin-6: depot difference and regulation by glucocorticoid,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 847–850, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
J. Y. Ahn, “Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with chronic kidney disease,” Gut Liver, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 585-586, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
N. D. Vaziri, J. Wong, M. Pahl et al., “Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora,” Kidney International, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 308–315, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
E. Rinninella, P. Raoul, M. Cintoni et al., “What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases,” Microorganisms, vol. 7, 1 page, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
S. Jiang, S. Xie, D. Lv et al., “Alteration of the gut microbiota in Chinese population with chronic kidney disease,” Science Report, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2870, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
V. Stadlbauer, A. Horvath, W. Ribitsch et al., “Structural and functional differences in gut microbiome composition in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis,” Science Report, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 15601, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
H. Cai, S. Su, Y. Li et al., “Danshen can interact with intestinal bacteria from normal and chronic renal failure rats,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 109, pp. 1758–1771, 2020.View at: Google Scholar