Therapeutic Targets and Mechanism of Xingpi Jieyu Decoction in Depression: A Network Pharmacology Study

Chang, Ze; He, Li-Juan; Tian, Dang-Feng; Gao, Qiang; Ling, Jing-Feng; Wang, Yu-Chun; Han, Zhen-Yun; Guo, Rong-Juan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516525

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5516525 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516525

Therapeutic Targets and Mechanism of Xingpi Jieyu Decoction in Depression: A Network Pharmacology Study

Ze Chang,^1,2Li-Juan He,¹Dang-Feng Tian,²Qiang Gao,²Jing-Feng Ling,²Yu-Chun Wang,²Zhen-Yun Han,³and Rong-Juan Guo¹

Academic Editor: Luigi Milella

Received06 Jan 2021

Revised03 Jun 2021

Accepted16 Jun 2021

Published24 Jun 2021

Abstract

Background. Depression is a common mental disease that lacks effective therapeutic drugs with good curative effects and few adverse reactions. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has the advantages of multiple components, multiple channels, and fewer adverse reactions in the treatment of depression. Although Xingpi Jieyu Decoction (XPJYD) demonstrates a good therapeutic effect on depression, the pharmacological mechanism underlying its antidepressant effect is still unclear. Methods. We used a network pharmacology strategy, including the construction and analysis of a complex drug-disease network, to explore the complex mechanism of XPJYD treatment of depression. In addition, molecular docking technology was used to preliminarily study the binding ability of the potential active components and core therapeutic targets of XPJYD. Results. The network pharmacology results showed 42 targets of XPJYD that are involved in depression. PPI network analysis demonstrated that the top 10 core targets were AKT1, VEGFA, MAPK8, FOS, ESR1, NR3C1, IL6, HIF1A, NOS3, and AR. The molecular docking results showed that the binding energies of beta sitosterol with AR, FOS, AKT1, VEGFA, NR3C1, and NOS3 were less than −7.0 kcal·mol⁻¹, indicating a good docking effect. The GO enrichment analysis results showed that the XPJYD antidepression mechanism mainly involves the following biological processes such as apoptotic signaling pathway, cellular response to lipid, inflammatory response, and others. The KEGG analysis results indicated that XPJYD may regulate 13 pathways such as PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and estrogen signaling pathway in the treatment of depression. Conclusions. This study reflects the characteristics of the mechanism of action by which XPJYD treats depression, which includes multiple components, multiple targets, and multiple pathways, and provides a biological basis for further verification and a novel perspective for drug discovery in depression.

1. Introduction

Depression (F32.900) is a kind of mental disease with obvious and lasting symptoms, such as low mood, decreased interest, and impaired cognitive function, which can affect a person’s thoughts, behavior, feelings, and sense of well-being [1]. It has the characteristics of a high prevalence rate, high recurrence rate, high disability rate, and high suicide rate, which cause substantial burdens to patients, their families, and society [2–4]. Although depression will become the second largest disease in the world after heart disease, the pathogenesis of depression is complex and unclear [5]. Current research shows that there are several hypotheses for the pathogenesis of depression, including the monoamine neurotransmitter and receptor hypotheses, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis hypothesis, and the neurotrophic factor hypothesis, as well as hypotheses involving oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, synaptic plasticity, and intestinal microflora imbalance [6–9]. Currently, the most common clinical treatment for depression is the administration of SSRI and SNRI drugs [10]. However, such drugs have the disadvantages of slow onset of treatment, incomplete relief of symptoms, and numerous adverse reactions, leading to reduced compliance of patients with medication and incomplete treatment of depression [11]. The treatment of depression with Traditional Chinese medicine, which incorporates the perspectives of physical and mental adjustment and has multicomponent, multitarget, and multimechanism characteristics, leads to an individualized diagnosis and treatment program combining differentiation and treatment that has few adverse reactions and can effectively alleviate cognitive dysfunction and somatization symptoms associated with depression [12–14].

Traditional Chinese herbs such as Herbahypericiperforati, Acoritataninowii Rhizoma, Turmeric, and Panax quinquefolium have better antidepressant effects. Compared with selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants, Herba Hyperici perforati showed better efficacy and higher safety in the treatment of mild to moderate depression [15]. Some studies have found that β-asarum, the main component of Acoritataninowii Rhizoma, had a protective effect on hippocampal neurons, increased the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2, and CREB in the hippocampus, and improved the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF in depressed rats [16, 17].

Xingpi Jieyu Decoction (XPJYD) is composed of Panacis Quinquefolii Radix, Herbahypericiperforati, Acoritataninowii Rhizoma, and Curcumae Radix. Previous studies have shown that XPJYD significantly decreased the preference for sugar water and the open-field test movement distance of depressed rats with CUMS and improved depressed behavior in depressed rats. Moreover, it increased the serum corticosterone concentration and reversed the serum 5-HT content in rats with depression, which is similar to the effect of sertraline, an SSRI antidepressant [18]. XPJYD is more effective than sertraline in improving learning and memory [19]. Depressed rats induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress showed oxidative stress injury in the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, skeletal muscle, and small intestine with disrupted mitochondrial function and energy metabolism in the later stage of stress [20, 21]. XPJYD can improve the function and energy metabolism of mitochondria in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, and other regions of the brain and has an antioxidative stress effect that is better than that of sertraline [22]. In general, studies have shown that XPJYD may have antidepressant effects by inhibiting the HPA axis, increasing monoamine neurotransmitters such as 5-HT, and regulating mitochondrial function.

Clinical evidence shows that, compared with traditional Chinese medicine placebo, XPJYD can reduce the scores of HAMD-24, SDS, and PHQ-15, improve the depressive mood and somatic symptoms of patients with depression, and increase the level of ATP in peripheral blood [23]. Intestinal microecological imbalance, which can cause impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function, is closely related to the inflammatory response of depression. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can enter the circulation through the damaged intestinal mucosal barrier and induce a systemic inflammatory response, leaving depressed patients in a state of chronic low-grade inflammation [24, 25]. Small sample clinical studies have shown that XPJYD can reduce serum LPS, D-lactic acid, DAO content in patients with depression and then reduce serum IL-6 and TNF-a content, indicating that XPJYD can repair the intestinal mucosal barrier and reduce the inflammatory response to a certain extent [26].

The research of network pharmacology on disease embodies the concept of systematicness, wholeness, and network, which is similar to the concept of wholeness in traditional Chinese medicine [27, 28]. Network pharmacology can explain, to a certain extent, the mechanism of action of multicomponent, multitarget, and multipathway of TCM compounds in the treatment of diseases [29]. Although XPJYD demonstrates a good therapeutic effect on depression, the pharmacological mechanism underlying its antidepressant effect is still unclear. Due to the complex composition of XPJYD, in this study, the network pharmacology method was used to study this Traditional Chinese medicine compound. By constructing a multilevel complex network of “disease-gene-target-drug” interactions, the potential material basis and multipathway mechanism of XPJYD in treating depression were explored, which provided a theoretical basis for its clinical application. The overall workflow of the study is shown in Figure 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Chemical Ingredients and Targets of XPJYD

All the components of XPJYD (American ginseng, Hypericum perforatum, Acorus gramineus, and Curcuma aromatica) were obtained by searching the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database [30] (TCMSP) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated Database [31] (TCMID). The potential active ingredients of XPJYD were screened by the following characteristics: standard oral bioavailability (OB) ≥30% and drug-like property (DL) ≥0.18 [32, 33]. We searched the targets of the potential active components of XPJYD in TCMSP and converted the gene names in the UniProt database. SwissTargetPrediction, which is an internet-based service for target prediction of bioactive small molecules, was used to make similarity predictions of the SMILES structure of each potential pharmacophore with Homo sapiens selected as the default species to predict the targets of potential drug molecules [34].

2.2. Acquisition of Targets Associated with Depression

Potential targets associated with depression were collected from the GeneCard [35], DisGeNET, and OMIM databases. The GeneCard database establishes the correlation ranking of genes and diseases and provides the Gifts algorithm [36]. Based on the relevance score, targets with higher Relevance can be further selected from many depression-related targets. By intersecting XPJYD component targets with disease targets, we obtained common targets for both drugs and diseases. Cytoscape software [37] was used to map the drug-component-target-disease network.

2.3. Construction of Protein-Protein Interaction Network

The shared targets between the drug targets and the disease targets were imported into the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) [38]. PPI network results were saved in TSV format and imported into Cytoscape3.7.1 software. The maximal clique centrality (MMC) algorithm in the cytoHubba plug-in was used for a comprehensive analysis of network topology to obtain the top 10 hub genes [39].

2.4. Gene Ontology and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for overlapping genes was performed using the MetScape database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) to identify biological processes. The KOBAS database (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [40] was used for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis with the “Human” setting to systematically explore pathways associated with the shared targets.

2.5. Molecular Docking

The PDB format of the core target protein was downloaded from the RCSB PDB database (http://www.rcsb.org/). We used PyMol 2.4 software to remove water molecules and separate the original ligand from the core target protein. We imported the processed protein targets into AutoDock Tools 1.5.6 software [41] to hydrogenate, calculate the total charge, and set the atomic type, and saved the files in the PDBQT format. The mol2 structures of the corresponding components of the core target were downloaded from the TCMSP database, and AutoDock Tools was used to set the rotatable bonds and to save the files in the PDBQT format. AutoDock-Vina software was used to perform molecular docking. Finally, PyMol and LigPlot + V.2.2 software were used to visualize the docking results and establish the docking interaction pattern.

3. Results

3.1. Acquisition of the Active Components and Targets of XPJYD

After screening with the set standards of OB ≥30% and DL ≥0.18, 33 potentially active ingredients were retrieved from TCMSP and TCMID, among which 7 were potential active ingredients of Hyacinth chrysoides, 11 were potential active ingredients of Panax quinquefolium, 4 were potential active ingredients of Acorus tatarinowii, and 15 were potential active ingredients of turmeric. Ginsenoside rh2 and its metabolites can reduce the activity duration of forced swimming test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST) in mice and improve the depression-like behavior induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), showing the highest antidepressant effect at 30 mg/kg [42]. Kaempferol alleviated hippocampal neuron injury in CUMS depression model rats by inhibiting autophagy and oxidative stress [43]. Quercetin alleviates LPS-induced depression-like behavior and learning and memory impairment in rats by regulating BDNF-related imbalance of Copine 6 and TREM1/2 expression in the hippocampus [44]. Naringenin improved depressive behavior and the learning and memory ability of rats with CUMS depression [45].

The corresponding target proteins of the active components were obtained by using TCMSP and SwissTargetPrediction, and the SwissTargetPrediction results were obtained according to a probability value above 0.5. Finally, 213 target proteins corresponding to 18 potentially active ingredients were acquired. The specific information of OB and DL values of 18 components is shown in Table 1.

3.2. Construction of the Drug-Component-Target-Disease Network

After screening with relevance score greater than 0.2 in GeneCard and score greater than 0.2 in DisGeNET, a total of 942 depression-related targets were retrieved from the GeneCard, OMIM, and DisGeNET databases. After the intersection of drug targets and disease targets, 42 drug-disease intersection targets were obtained, namely, the targets of XPJYD involved in the treatment of depression. Cytoscape3.7.1 software was used to construct the drug-component-target-disease network, and the results are shown in Figure 2. The figure shows that an active ingredient in XPJYD can correspond to multiple targets, and a target can also correspond to different active ingredients. The same disease may correspond to different targets, and different targets may correspond to different active components of XPJYD. These results indicated that the antidepressant mechanism of XPJYD has multicomponent and multitarget characteristics. The components with a degree value greater than 20 in the network topology analysis were quercetin (degree = 58), kaempferol (degree = 52), luteolin (degree = 26), and beta sitosterol (degree = 28).

3.3. PPI Network Analysis

The overlapping target genes were imported into the STRING database with medium confidence set to 0.4 to obtain a PPI network for the targets. The PPI network results were saved in TSV text format and imported into Cytoscape3.7.1 software for network topology analysis to obtain the top 10 hub genes. The results of the network topology analysis are shown in Figure 3. The PPI network contains 42 nodes with 207 edges, in which the circular nodes represent the target proteins, each edge represents the interaction relationship between the target protein and another protein, and the thickness of the edge represents the strength of the interaction force. The top 10 targets obtained on cytoHubba are AKT1, VEGFA, MAPK8, FOS, ESR1, NR3C1, IL6, HIF1A, NOS3, and AR. These targets play an important role in the PPI network, suggesting that they are important targets in the treatment of depression by XPJYD. There are three subtypes of AKT (AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3), and AKT1 is the most important subtype, which plays an important role in depression [46]. The study showed that AKT protein activity was significantly reduced in the brain tissues of suicidal patients with major depression [47]. Akt may enhance the efficacy of antidepressant drugs by enhancing the function of hippocampal stem cells [48]. AKT1 gene polymorphism was associated with treatment response in depressed patients [49]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important regulatory role in inducing endothelial cell proliferation, promoting cell migration, inhibiting cell apoptosis, and inducing vascular permeability [50]. As a multifunctional angiogenic factor, it plays an important role in the treatment of depression [51]. Previous studies found that the expression levels of VEGFA in rats with chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression were significantly lower than those in the blank group [52]. A relevant meta-analysis showed that the concentrations of inflammatory factors such as IL-6 and TNF were higher than normal in patients with depression [53]. Estrogen receptors are divided into nuclear receptors and membrane receptors. Nuclear receptors include estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ), while the main membrane receptor of estrogen is the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) [54]. It was found that the RS9340799 polymorphism of the ER gene may influence the development and outcome of depression [55]. ERβ agonists were also found to reverse depression-like behavior in ovariectomized rats [56]. The GPER agonist G1 alleviated the depressive behavior of depressed rats by increasing GPER in the hippocampus [57]. Androgen receptor (AR) may influence the development of major depressive disorder [58]. The study suggests that AR deficiency may accelerate the development of depression-like behavior in chronically mildly stressed mice [59]. The mechanism may be to regulate the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) by altering the expression of miR-204-5p [60], thereby affecting the depression-like behavior of CMS mice.

3.4. Analysis of Molecular Docking Results

Quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and beta sitosterol were used for molecular docking with the top 10 hub genes. The molecular docking results are presented in the form of a heat map (Figure 4). A binding energy (affinity) < −7.0 kcal·mol⁻¹ indicates good binding activity. Lower binding energy indicates a better docking efficiency. The molecular docking results showed that the binding energies of beta sitosterol with AR, FOS, AKT1, VEGFA, NR3C1, and NOS3 were less than −7.0 kcal·mol⁻¹, indicating a good docking effect. Kaempferol, luteolin, and quercetin have a good docking effect with AR genes.

Diagrams of the interaction structures of the interaction between the active ingredient and the hub genes with good binding energy were drawn. The diagrams are shown in Figure 5 and include 3 different representations designated A, B, and C. Representation A shows the binding sites of small molecules on the respective proteins. Representation B shows the detailed interactions between the small molecule compounds and the key residues on the respective proteins to show whether the small molecules and proteins interact at specific spatial locations. Representation C is a two-dimensional schematic for observing the hydrogen bond and hydrophobic action caused by small molecules and protein residues. The active ingredients such as beta sitosterol, kaempferol, quercetin, and luteolin form hydrogen bonds with AR, respectively. The results showed that beta sitosterol formed hydrogen bonds with FOS, VEGFA, NR3C1, and NOS3 genes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

Figure 5

Schematic diagram of molecular docking results in less than −7.0 kcal·mol⁻¹. (A) Overall map of binding sites of small molecules to proteins. (B) Detailed 3D diagrams. The small molecules are represented in yellow STICKS models. (C) Two-dimensional graphs of docking results. (a) Beta-sitosterol and AR, (b) beta sitosterol and FOS, (c) beta sitosterol and AKT1, (d) beta sitosterol and H1F1A, (e) beta sitosterol and ESR1, (f) beta sitosterol and VEGFA, (g) beta sitosterol and NR3C1, (h) beta sitosterol and NOS3, (i) kaempferol and AR, (j) quercetin and AR, (k) luteolin and AR.

3.5. GO Enrichment Analysis of the Overlapping Targets

GO enrichment analysis mainly involves three aspects: cell composition, molecular function, and biological process. As shown in Figure 6, the biological functions of the targets were analyzed using the Metscape database. The overlapping targets are mainly distributed in cell components such as postsynapse, receptor complex, and nuclear speck. and are involved in molecular functions such as steroid binding, hormone binding, and protein kinase binding. The results indicated that the antidepression mechanism of XPJYD mainly involves biological processes such as apoptotic signaling pathway, cellular response to lipid, inflammatory response, neuron death, response to reactive oxygen species, and others.

3.6. KEGG Analysis

We used the KOBAS database to analyze the KEGG pathways of the overlapping targets. A total of 198 pathways were enriched, of which the 13 pathways associated with depression are shown in Figure 7. The results showed that XPJYD may achieve antidepressant effects through the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, the relaxin signaling pathway, the MAPK signaling pathway, the endocrine resistance, the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, the HIF-1 signaling pathway, the dopaminergic synapse, the estrogen signaling pathway, the Focal adhesion, the cAMP signaling pathway, the TNF signaling pathway, the Ras signaling pathway, the Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and so on.

4. Discussion

The network pharmacology results showed that, with conditions of OB ≥30% and DL ≥0.18, 14 main active components of XPJYD were identified, and these components were predicted to target 45 potential depression-related proteins. Four important active components of XPJYF were identified from the drug-component-target-disease network, namely, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, and beta sitosterol. Quercetin, which can improve the level of monoamine transmitters in the brain and regulate the activity of the HPA axis, plays an important role in the treatment of depression [61]. Luteolin may play an antidepressant role by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis [62]. Kaempferol, which has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, may exert its antidepressant effects by increasing the Akt/β-catenin cascade in the prefrontal cortex [63]. In addition, kaempferol reduced the concentrations of inflammatory mediators IL-1β and TNFα in the prefrontal cortex of depressed mice, especially at a dose of 20 mg/kg [64]. Beta-sitosterol shortened the immobility time of depressed mice in forced swimming experiments and regulated the levels of NE, 5-HT and the metabolite 5-HIAA in the brains of mice. Its antidepressant effect was similar to that of the positive control, 30 mg/kg fluoxetine [65]. Relevant literature has reported that these active ingredients are significantly associated with depression, suggesting that XPJYD may have an antidepressant effect through these active ingredients.

PPI network analysis showed that VEGFA, EGFR, CASP3, IL6, ESR1, and other targets have important implications in the treatment of depression with XPJYD. Studies have shown that AKT1, VEGFA, ESR1, IL6, and AR play an important role in the treatment of depression [47–49, 53, 55, 59, 60]. An experimental study showed that XPJYD reduced the serum and hippocampal levels of IL-6, TNFα, and other inflammatory factors in depression model rats and improved their learning and memory behaviors [66]. The molecular docking results showed that beta sitosterol had good docking results beta sitosterol with AR, FOS, AKT1, VEGFA, NR3C1, and NOS3 genes and formed hydrogen bonds with FOS, VEGFA, NR3C1, and NOS3 genes, suggesting that beta sitosterol may be the main active ingredient of XPJYD involved in its antidepressant effect.

GO function analysis shows that XPJYD is involved in biological processes that can achieve antidepressant effects, such as apoptotic signaling pathway, cellular response to lipid, inflammatory response, neuron death, response to reactive oxygen species, and others. KEGG pathway analysis showed that XPJYD mainly regulates 13 pathways such as PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and estrogen signaling pathway to treat depression. The PI3k-Akt pathway, a classic antiapoptotic and prosurvival pathway, is widely found in various cells and has biological functions that include regulating cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and autophagy [67]. In nerve cells, the PI3K-Akt pathway not only regulates the proliferation and differentiation of nerve cells and induces the autophagy of nerve cells but also participates in regulating blood flow in the brain and promoting the survival of neurons, which is closely related to the occurrence and development of depression [68, 69]. Studies have shown that the occurrence of depression is associated with key targets in the PI3K-Akt pathway, which is also one of the pathways in which many antidepressants exert important effects. Venlafaxine is a nonclassical antidepressant that inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitters 5-HT and NA. Venlafaxine can affect the PI3K-Akt pathway to inhibit the apoptosis of hippocampal neurons and improve the behavior of depressed rats [70]. A study has found that XPJYD inhibited the expression levels of PI3K, Akt, and P-Akt, thereby regulating the PI3K-Akt pathway, protecting the vascular endothelium of CUMS-depressed rats, and improving depression symptoms in rats [71]. XPJYD may regulate cerebral blood flow and promote neuronal survival through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to treat depression, as shown in Figure 8. Studies have shown that XPJYD improved the serum VEGFA concentration, regulated the PI3K/Akt/eNOS-specific pathway, regulated cerebral cortex blood flow, and improved depression symptoms in rats with chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression [50].

The estrogen signaling pathway plays an important role in the treatment of depression. Some reports suggest that estrogen replacement therapy has antidepressant effects in both clinical and animal studies [72, 73]. Studies have shown that estrogen can increase the 5-HT content in serum by inhibiting the degradation of monoamine oxidase and promoting an increase in tryptophan hydroxylase levels [74, 75]. Estrogen not only regulates gene transcription but also binds to estrogen receptors on cell membranes to activate the PI3K signaling pathway [76]. XPJYD, which may have activity similar to that of estrogen, could increase the 5-HT content in the brain by estrogen receptors to affect the PI3K signaling pathway. Literature studies have found that the occurrence, development, and treatment of depression are related to relaxin signaling pathway [77], MAPK signaling pathway [78], endocrine resistance [79], AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications [80], HIF-1 signaling pathway [81], dopaminergic synapse [82], focal adhesion [83], cAMP signaling pathway [84], TNF signaling pathway [85], Ras signaling pathway [86], and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction [87]. Thus, we infer that the antidepressant mechanism of XPJYD is realized through the regulation of the above 13 pathways, which remained to be further validated. In addition, pathway enrichment analysis showed that some tumor-related pathways may be related to the antidepressant mechanism of XPJYD. In later research stages, we will further explore related pathways.

Preliminary experimental results showed that XPJYD may increase the content of 5-HT and DA in the brain, improve cerebral blood flow, and inhibit the inflammatory response and HPA axis hyperactivity. The network pharmacological results showed that XPJYD may regulate 13 pathways such as the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and estrogen signaling pathway to treat depression. Most network pharmacology studies are based on virtual screening of databases, while TCM compounds can only show a therapeutic role on the basis of in vivo processes such as oral absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Due to the limitations of network pharmacology, this study needs further experimental verification.

5. Conclusion

In summary, network pharmacological analysis revealed characteristics of the mechanism of action by which XPJYD treats depression, which involves multiple components, multiple targets, and multiple pathways. XPJYD is an important modulator of AKT1, VEGFA, ESR1, IL6, and AR through active ingredients such as beta sitosterol. XPJYD achieves antidepressant effects by regulating 13 pathways, including the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and estrogen signaling pathway. Although these 13 pathways have been shown to be strongly associated with depression, some pathways have not yet been shown to be regulated by XPJYD. Therefore, these pathways provide experimental research directions for the further study of XPJYD in the treatment of depression.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and supplementary information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhen-Yun Han and Rong-Juan Guo, as corresponding authors with equal contributions,conceived and designed the research. Chang Ze performed the research and wrote the paper. He Lijuan performed the experiments and revised the manuscript. Tian Dangfeng, Gao Qiang, Ling Jingfeng, and Wang Yuchun analyzed the data and drew figures. Ze Chang and Li-Juan He are equal contributors.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1710103), the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation (NO30973706), the General Project of Beijing Natural Science Foundation (NO7202120), and the Prevention and Control Research of Major Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (2017YFC1307701).

Supplementary Materials

Figure 6 data: GO enrichment analysis data for the overlapping targets needed to draw Figure 6. Figure 7 data: KEGG pathway enrichment data for the overlapping targets needed to draw Figure 7. (Supplementary Materials)

References

F. Biedermann and W. W. Fleischhacker, “Psychotic disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-11,” CNS Spectrums, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 349–354, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Huang, Y. Wang, H. Wang et al., “Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study,” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 211–224, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Phillips, J. X. Zhang, Q. C. Shi et al., “Prevalence, treatment, and associated disability of mental disorders in four provinces in China during 2001-05: an epidemiological survey,” Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9680, pp. 2041–2053, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dean and M. Keshavan, “The neurobiology of depression: an integrated view,” Asian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 27, pp. 101–111, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Malhi and J. J. Mann, “Depression,” Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10161, pp. 2299–2312, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Peng, J. S. Tian, X. X. Gao, Y. Z. Zhou, and X. M. Qin, “Research on the pathological mechanism and drug treatment mechanism of depression,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 514–523, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Villas Boas, R. Boerngen de Lacerda, M. M. Paes et al., “Molecular aspects of depression: a review from neurobiology to treatment,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 851, pp. 99–121, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Golden, D. J. Christoffel, M. Heshmati et al., “Epigenetic regulation of RAC1 induces synaptic remodeling in stress disorders and depression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 337–344, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, Y. Ni, F. Guo, Z. Sun, A. Ahmed, and R. Zhao, “Differential expression of hypothalamic fear- and stress-related genes in broiler chickens showing short or long tonic immobility,” Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 47, pp. 65–72, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Blier, “Neurobiology of depression and mechanism of action of depression treatments,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 3, p. e319, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Murrough, C. G. Abdallah, and S. J. Mathew, “Targeting glutamate signalling in depression: progress and prospects,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 472–486, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, J. S. Tian, H. Liu, and X. M. Qin, “Progress of new antidepressant drugs development,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Q. Mao and Z. Huang, “Research progress on therapeutic mechanism of depression treated by traditional Chinese medicine,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 877–880, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. S. Wang, C. Y. Shen, and J. G. Jiang, “Antidepressant active ingredients from herbs and nutraceuticals used in TCM: pharmacological mechanisms and prospects for drug discovery,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 150, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. X. Ng, N. Venkatanarayanan, and C. Y. Ho, “Clinical use of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in depression: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 210, pp. 211–221, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dong, Z. Gao, H. Rong, M. Jin, and X. Zhang, “β-asarone reverses chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression-like behavior and promotes hippocampal neurogenesis in rats,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 5634–5649, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Butterweck, “Mechanism of action of st John???s wort in depression,” CNS Drugs, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 539–562, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Wang and R. J. Guo, “The effect of xingpijieyu decoction on depressive behavior and serum 5-HT as well as corticosteroneof depression rats from chronic stress,” World Chinese Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 1633–1635+1639, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Y. Wang, R. J. Guo, and X. C. Zhu, “Effect of Xingpi Jieyu Decoction on learning-memory behavior and inflammatory factors level in depression rats,” Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 33, pp. 503–506, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gardner and R. G. Boles, “Mitochondrial energy depletion in depression with somatization,” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 127–129, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hroudová, Z. Fišar, E. Kitzlerová, M. Zvěřová, and J. Raboch, “Mitochondrial respiration in blood platelets of depressive patients,” Mitochondrion, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 795–800, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. W. Shi, R. J. Guo, Z. W. Zhao et al., “Effects of Xingpi Jieyu Fang on behavior and mitochondria ultrastructure of hippocampus and skeletal muscle in depressed rats,” Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 40, pp. 284–289, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, R. J. Guo, Z. H. Zhao et al., “Clinical effect of Xingpi Jieyu Formula on mild to moderate depression of liver depression and spleen deficiency pattern,” Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 83–91, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, M. A. Lawson, R. Dantzer, and K. W. Kelley, “LPS-induced indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is regulated in an interferon-gamma-independent manner by a JNK signaling pathway in primary murine microglia,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. O'Connor, C. André, Y. Wang et al., “Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediate the upregulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and the induction of depressive-like behavior in mice in response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 4200–4209, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yu, Based on Intestinal Microecological Imbalance to Explore the Effect Mechanism of Xingpijieyu Decoction on Depression with Liver Depression and Spleen Deficiency, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Chaoyang, China, 2020.
H. Li, L. Zhao, B. Zhang et al., “A network pharmacology approach to determine active compounds and action mechanisms of ge-gen-qin-lian decoction for treatment of type 2 diabetes,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 495840, 12 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, “Network target: a starting point for traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 36, no. 15, pp. 2017–2020, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Li and B. Zhang, “Traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology: theory, methodology and application,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 110–120, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Ru, P. Li, J. N. Wang et al., “TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Xue, Z. Fang, M. X. Zhang, Z. H. Yi, C. P. Wen, and T. L. Shi, “TCMID: traditional Chinese medicine integrative database for herb molecular mechanism analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. D1, pp. D1089–D1095, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xu, W. X. Zhang, C. Huang et al., “A novel chemometric method for the prediction of human oral bioavailability,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 6964–6982, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Tao, X. Xu, X. Wang et al., “Network pharmacology-based prediction of the active ingredients and potential targets of Chinese herbal Radix Curcumae formula for application to cardiovascular disease,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Gfeller, A. Grosdidier, M. Wirth, A. Daina, O. Michielin, and V. Zoete, “SwissTargetPrediction: a web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, pp. W32–W38, 2014, Web Server issue.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rebhan, V. Chalifa-Caspi, J. Prilusky, and D. Lancet, “GeneCards: a novel functional genomics compendium with automated data mining and query reformulation support,” Bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 656–664, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Stelzer, N. Rosen, I. Plaschkes et al., “The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses,” Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, vol. 54, pp. 1.30.31–31.30.33, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Smoot, K. Ono, J. Ruscheinski, P. L. Wang, and T. Ideker, “Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 431-432, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Szklarczyk, J. H. Morris, H. Cook et al., “The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. D1, pp. D362–D368, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Chin, S. H. Chen, H. H. Wu, C. W. Ho, M. T. Ko, and C. Y. Lin, “cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome,” Bmc Systems Biology, vol. 8, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Xie, X. Mao, J. Huang et al., “KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, Web Server issue, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Trott and A. J. Olson, “AutoDock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 455–461, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. X. Chen, Z. Qi, Z. J. Shao et al., “Study on antidepressant activity of pseudo-ginsenoside HQ on depression-like behavior in mice,” Molecules, vol. 24, 5 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, R. Zhang, B. Li et al., “Protective effects of kaempferol on autophagy-and oxidative stress-mediated injury of hippocampal neuron in CUMS-induced depression model rats,” Chinese Journal of Immunology, vol. 35, pp. 146–150+155, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Fang, H. R. Li, X. X. Chen et al., “Quercetin alleviates LPS-induced depression-like behavior in rats via regulating BDNF-related imbalance of copine 6 and TREM1/2 in the Hippocampus and PFC,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 10, Article ID 1544, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tayyab, S. Farheen, P. M. M. Mariyath, N. Khanam, M. M. Hossain, and M. H. Shahi, “Antidepressant and neuroprotective effects of naringenin via sonic hedgehog-GLI1 cell signaling pathway in a rat model of chronic unpredictable mild stress,” Neuromolecular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 250–261, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yang, N. Sun, Y. Ren et al., “Association between AKT1 gene polymorphisms and depressive symptoms in the Chinese Han population with major depressive disorder,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Meyer and J. A. Morris, “Immunohistochemical analysis of Disc1 expression in the developing and adult hippocampus,” Gene Expression Patterns, vol. 8, no. 7-8, pp. 494–501, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Karege, N. Perroud, S. Burkhardt et al., “Alteration in kinase activity but not in protein levels of protein kinase B and glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta in ventral prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide victims,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 240–245, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Losenkov, N. M. Vyalova, G. G. Simutkin, N. A. Bokhan, and S. A. Ivanova, “An association of AKT1 gene polymorphism with antidepressant treatment response,” World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 239–242, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Khayati, L. Perez-Cano, K. Maouche et al., “EMMPRIN/CD147 is a novel coreceptor of VEGFR-2 mediating its activation by VEGF,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 9766–9780, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Greene, M. Banasr, B. Lee, J. Warner-Schmidt, and R. S. Duman, “Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling is required for the behavioral actions of antidepressant treatment: pharmacological and cellular characterization,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2459–2468, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Yao, Q. J. Yuan et al., “Effects of Xingpi Jiyu granule on serum IL-8 and liver MDA, mtDNA and ATP levels in CUMS depressive model rats,” Global Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 497–501, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Dowlati, N. Herrmann, W. Swardfager et al., “A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 446–457, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Prossnitz and M. Barton, “The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER in health and disease,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 715–726, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Feng, J. Lin, Q. W. Guo et al., “Longitudinal interactions of estrogen receptor alpha gene rs9340799 with social-environmental factors on depression in adolescents after Wenchuan earthquake,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 45, pp. 305–310, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Estrada, V. Ghisays, E. T. Nguyen, J. L. Caldwell, J. Streicher, and M. B. Solomon, “Estrogen signaling in the medial amygdala decreases emotional stress responses and obesity in ovariectomized rats,” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 98, pp. 33–44, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Prossnitz and J. B. Arterburn, “International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. XCVII. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor and its pharmacologic modulators,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 505–540, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Sankar and E. Hampson, “Testosterone levels and androgen receptor gene polymorphism predict specific symptoms of depression in young men,” Gender Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 232–243, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Selakovic, J. Joksimovic, N. Jovicic et al., “The impact of hippocampal sex hormones receptors in modulation of depressive-like behavior following chronic anabolic androgenic steroids and exercise protocols in rats,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 19, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Hung, Y. L. Huang, C. Chang, and H. Y. Kang, “Deficiency in androgen receptor aggravates the depressive-like behaviors in chronic mild stress model of depression,” Cells, vol. 8, 9 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Samad, A. Saleem, F. Yasmin, and M. A. Shehzad, “Quercetin protects against stress-induced anxiety- and depression-like behavior and improves memory in male mice,” Physiological Research, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 795–808, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ishisaka, K. Kakefuda, M. Yamauchi et al., “Luteolin shows an antidepressant-like effect via suppressing endoplasmic reticulum stress,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1481–1486, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Gao, W. Wang, Y. Peng, and Z. Deng, “Antidepressive effects of kaempferol mediated by reduction of oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines and up-regulation of AKT/beta-catenin cascade,” Metabolic Brain Disease, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 485–494, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Silva Dos Santos, J. P. Goncalves Cirino, P. de Oliveira Carvalho, and M. M. Ortega, “The pharmacological action of kaempferol in central nervous system diseases: a review,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, Article ID 565700, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, L. Zheng, L. Qi et al., “Structural features and potent antidepressant effects of total sterols and beta-sitosterol extracted from sargassum horneri,” Marine Drugs, vol. 14, 7 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ma, D. Y. Gao, Y. Yu et al., “Effects of chronic stress on rats’ spleen energy metabolism and cellular immune function damage and intervention mechanism of Xingpi Jieyu Decoction,” Global Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 321–327, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Song, G. Ouyang, and S. Bao, “The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Krenning, M. J. A. van Luyn, and M. C. Harmsen, “Endothelial progenitor cell-based neovascularization: implications for therapy,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 180–189, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Navarro, C. Gasto, F. Lomena et al., “Prognostic value of frontal functional neuroimaging in late-onset severe major depression,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 184, pp. 306–311, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Huang, Y. S. Mao, C. Li, H. Wang, and J. L. Ji, “Venlafaxine inhibits apoptosis of hippocampal neurons by up-regulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor in a rat depression model,” Pharmazie, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 909–916, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Y. Gao, The VEGF/PI3K/Akt/eNOS Pathway Was Used to Explore the Mechanism of Vascular Endothelial Injury and the Protective Mechanism of Xingpijieyu Decoction in Depressed Rats with CUMS, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 2019.
J. W. Studd, “A guide to the treatment of depression in women by estrogens,” Climacteric, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 637–642, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kiss, A. M. Delattre, S. I. Pereira et al., “17 beta-estradiol replacement in young, adult and middle-aged female ovariectomized rats promotes improvement of spatial reference memory and an antidepressant effect and alters monoamines and BDNF levels in memory- and depression-related brain areas,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Smith, J. A. Henderson, C. W. Abell, and C. L. Bethea, “Effects of ovarian steroids and raloxifene on proteins that synthesize, transport, and degrade serotonin in the raphe region of macaques,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2035–2045, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. McEwen, S. E. Alves, K. Bulloch, and N. G. Weiland, “Ovarian steroids and the brain: implications for cognition and aging,” Neurology, vol. 48, no. 5 Suppl 7, pp. S8–S15, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. de Oliveira, L. M. de Oliveira, L. P. de Oliveira et al., “Activation of PI3K/Akt pathway mediated by estrogen receptors accounts for estrone-induced vascular activation of cGMP signaling,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 110, pp. 42–48, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. T. Hosken, S. W. Sutton, C. M. Smith, and A. L. Gundlach, “Relaxin-3 receptor (Rxfp3) gene knockout mice display reduced running wheel activity: implications for role of relaxin-3/RXFP3 signalling in sustained arousal,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 278, pp. 167–175, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nho, V. K. Ramanan, E. Horgusluoglu et al., “Comprehensive gene- and pathway-based analysis of depressive symptoms in older adults,” Journal of Alzheimers Disease, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1197–1206, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Kim, K. S. Na, A. M. Myint, and B. E. Leonard, “The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in neuroinflammation, neurogenesis and the neuroendocrine system in major depression,” Progess in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 64, pp. 277–284, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Franklin, E. S. Wohleb, Y. Zhang, M. Fogaca, B. Hare, and R. S. Duman, “Persistent increase in microglial RAGE contributes to chronic stress-induced priming of depressive-like behavior,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Li, M. Zhao, X. Cheng et al., “FG-4592 improves depressive-like behaviors through HIF-1-Mediated neurogenesis and synapse plasticity in rats,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 664–675, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. W. Dunlop and C. B. Nemeroff, “The role of dopamine in the pathophysiology of depression,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 327–337, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mehta, M. Rex-Haffner, H. B. Sondergaard, A. Pinborg, E. B. Binder, and V. G. Frokjaer, “Genome-wide gene expression in a pharmacological hormonal transition model and its relation to depressive symptoms,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Fujita, E. M. Richards, M. J. Niciu et al., “cAMP signaling in brain is decreased in unmedicated depressed patients and increased by treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 754–759, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yao, J. C. Zhang, C. Dong et al., “Effects of amycenone on serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10, and depression-like behavior in mice after lipopolysaccharide administration,” Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, vol. 136, pp. 7–12, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Martins-de-Souza, G. Maccarrone, M. Ising et al., “Blood mononuclear cell proteome suggests integrin and Ras signaling as critical pathways for antidepressant treatment response,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. e15–17, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, P. Fan, S. Zhang, Y. Wang, and D. Liu, “Prioritization and comprehensive analysis of genes related to major depressive disorder,” Molecular Genetics ans Genomic Medicine, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e659, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ze Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

525

Downloads

840

Citations